“The order of a torus link can be understood as a rational number”Alexander Multivariate Polynomial of a General Torus LinkCan the HOMFLY polynomial be obtained from the Kauffman Polynomial for torus knots?Crossing number and Torus linksTorus link and knotsWhat is a good reference for learning about induced norms?How do I find subsequent work done on a paper?Unlinking the toroidified Hopf link, overhand knot, in $mathbb R^4$?Are there special terms for (non-)bijective isometries?Are the borromean rings a torus link?Involution of the 3 and 4-holed torus and its effects on some knots and links

Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank

What prevents the use of a multi-segment ILS for non-straight approaches?

Why electric field inside a cavity of a non-conducting sphere not zero?

Creature in Shazam mid-credits scene?

Where did Heinlein say "Once you get to Earth orbit, you're halfway to anywhere in the Solar System"?

Is there a working SACD iso player for Ubuntu?

Is it improper etiquette to ask your opponent what his/her rating is before the game?

A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?

What is the evidence for the "tyranny of the majority problem" in a direct democracy context?

When were female captains banned from Starfleet?

Why did the HMS Bounty go back to a time when whales are already rare?

How to indicate a cut out for a product window

In Qur'an 7:161, why is "say the word of humility" translated in various ways?

Is there a single word describing earning money through any means?

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

Aragorn's "guise" in the Orthanc Stone

Creepy dinosaur pc game identification

Are the IPv6 address space and IPv4 address space completely disjoint?

When a Cleric spontaneously casts a Cure Light Wounds spell, will a Pearl of Power recover the original spell or Cure Light Wounds?

How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?

Closed-form expression for certain product

What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?

The IT department bottlenecks progress. How should I handle this?

Store Credit Card Information in Password Manager?



“The order of a torus link can be understood as a rational number”


Alexander Multivariate Polynomial of a General Torus LinkCan the HOMFLY polynomial be obtained from the Kauffman Polynomial for torus knots?Crossing number and Torus linksTorus link and knotsWhat is a good reference for learning about induced norms?How do I find subsequent work done on a paper?Unlinking the toroidified Hopf link, overhand knot, in $mathbb R^4$?Are there special terms for (non-)bijective isometries?Are the borromean rings a torus link?Involution of the 3 and 4-holed torus and its effects on some knots and links













1












$begingroup$


The order of a torus link consists of a pair of integers $(m,n)$, with at least one of them nonzero, and it is such that if the two integers are not coprime, i.e. of the form $(km, kn)$, the link forms $k$ interlinked copies of the $(m,n)$ knot.



Because of this, I see a clear correspondence between these orders and the rational numbers $mathbb Q$ (possibly supplemented with a point at infinity, if required?), which also consist of pairs of integers with equivalences between pairs that are multiples of each other.



Is there any nice reference that formalizes this correspondence, or which uses it explicitly? The more 'textbook-y' (which is to say, the more suitable for use as a reference for this fact in a separate context), the better.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    The order of a torus link consists of a pair of integers $(m,n)$, with at least one of them nonzero, and it is such that if the two integers are not coprime, i.e. of the form $(km, kn)$, the link forms $k$ interlinked copies of the $(m,n)$ knot.



    Because of this, I see a clear correspondence between these orders and the rational numbers $mathbb Q$ (possibly supplemented with a point at infinity, if required?), which also consist of pairs of integers with equivalences between pairs that are multiples of each other.



    Is there any nice reference that formalizes this correspondence, or which uses it explicitly? The more 'textbook-y' (which is to say, the more suitable for use as a reference for this fact in a separate context), the better.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      The order of a torus link consists of a pair of integers $(m,n)$, with at least one of them nonzero, and it is such that if the two integers are not coprime, i.e. of the form $(km, kn)$, the link forms $k$ interlinked copies of the $(m,n)$ knot.



      Because of this, I see a clear correspondence between these orders and the rational numbers $mathbb Q$ (possibly supplemented with a point at infinity, if required?), which also consist of pairs of integers with equivalences between pairs that are multiples of each other.



      Is there any nice reference that formalizes this correspondence, or which uses it explicitly? The more 'textbook-y' (which is to say, the more suitable for use as a reference for this fact in a separate context), the better.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      The order of a torus link consists of a pair of integers $(m,n)$, with at least one of them nonzero, and it is such that if the two integers are not coprime, i.e. of the form $(km, kn)$, the link forms $k$ interlinked copies of the $(m,n)$ knot.



      Because of this, I see a clear correspondence between these orders and the rational numbers $mathbb Q$ (possibly supplemented with a point at infinity, if required?), which also consist of pairs of integers with equivalences between pairs that are multiples of each other.



      Is there any nice reference that formalizes this correspondence, or which uses it explicitly? The more 'textbook-y' (which is to say, the more suitable for use as a reference for this fact in a separate context), the better.







      reference-request rational-numbers knot-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 15 at 18:18









      E.P.E.P.

      1,5401125




      1,5401125




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          A torus link is any link that is isotopic into the standard unknotted torus in $S^3$ (the Clifford torus, if you like). So, the problem of torus link classification can start with the question of what are the possible links in $T^2$ itself, with all the isotopies restricted to the torus.



          Take a look at the section "Knots in the torus," starting on page 17 of Rolfsen's Knots and Links. A first step of link classification can be knot classification, i.e., the classification of simple closed curves in $T^2$. There are two main types: separating (equivalently, nullhomotopic or bounds-a-disk) and non-separating. The separating ones are just unknots, so let's exclude them. The non-separating curves are in one-to-one correspondence with non-divisible elements of $H_1(T^2)$, and if you choose a basis for $H_1(T^2)$ you get the pair-of-integers representation $(a,b)$ with $a,b$ coprime. Conceptually, the argument is that in the universal cover, the loop lifts to a path between integer points, and by a homotopy you can pull the line tight and it has rational slope.



          For links on a torus, you can use intersection numbers to see that all the components have to be parallel (meaning they all have the same slope). There is a standard construction to represent an arbitrary element of $H_1$ as a collection of simple closed curves, and in $T^2$ this element is unique up to isotopy. For $(ka,kb)in H_1(T^2)$ with $a,b$ coprime and $kgeq 1$ (which encompasses every non-zero element of the homology group), the construction gives $k$ parallel copies of the $(a,b)$ knot in $T^2$.



          Calegari's book on foliations says a little at the beginning about the relation between homotopy and isotopy in a surface: https://math.uchicago.edu/~dannyc/books/foliations/foliations.html






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3149632%2fthe-order-of-a-torus-link-can-be-understood-as-a-rational-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            A torus link is any link that is isotopic into the standard unknotted torus in $S^3$ (the Clifford torus, if you like). So, the problem of torus link classification can start with the question of what are the possible links in $T^2$ itself, with all the isotopies restricted to the torus.



            Take a look at the section "Knots in the torus," starting on page 17 of Rolfsen's Knots and Links. A first step of link classification can be knot classification, i.e., the classification of simple closed curves in $T^2$. There are two main types: separating (equivalently, nullhomotopic or bounds-a-disk) and non-separating. The separating ones are just unknots, so let's exclude them. The non-separating curves are in one-to-one correspondence with non-divisible elements of $H_1(T^2)$, and if you choose a basis for $H_1(T^2)$ you get the pair-of-integers representation $(a,b)$ with $a,b$ coprime. Conceptually, the argument is that in the universal cover, the loop lifts to a path between integer points, and by a homotopy you can pull the line tight and it has rational slope.



            For links on a torus, you can use intersection numbers to see that all the components have to be parallel (meaning they all have the same slope). There is a standard construction to represent an arbitrary element of $H_1$ as a collection of simple closed curves, and in $T^2$ this element is unique up to isotopy. For $(ka,kb)in H_1(T^2)$ with $a,b$ coprime and $kgeq 1$ (which encompasses every non-zero element of the homology group), the construction gives $k$ parallel copies of the $(a,b)$ knot in $T^2$.



            Calegari's book on foliations says a little at the beginning about the relation between homotopy and isotopy in a surface: https://math.uchicago.edu/~dannyc/books/foliations/foliations.html






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              A torus link is any link that is isotopic into the standard unknotted torus in $S^3$ (the Clifford torus, if you like). So, the problem of torus link classification can start with the question of what are the possible links in $T^2$ itself, with all the isotopies restricted to the torus.



              Take a look at the section "Knots in the torus," starting on page 17 of Rolfsen's Knots and Links. A first step of link classification can be knot classification, i.e., the classification of simple closed curves in $T^2$. There are two main types: separating (equivalently, nullhomotopic or bounds-a-disk) and non-separating. The separating ones are just unknots, so let's exclude them. The non-separating curves are in one-to-one correspondence with non-divisible elements of $H_1(T^2)$, and if you choose a basis for $H_1(T^2)$ you get the pair-of-integers representation $(a,b)$ with $a,b$ coprime. Conceptually, the argument is that in the universal cover, the loop lifts to a path between integer points, and by a homotopy you can pull the line tight and it has rational slope.



              For links on a torus, you can use intersection numbers to see that all the components have to be parallel (meaning they all have the same slope). There is a standard construction to represent an arbitrary element of $H_1$ as a collection of simple closed curves, and in $T^2$ this element is unique up to isotopy. For $(ka,kb)in H_1(T^2)$ with $a,b$ coprime and $kgeq 1$ (which encompasses every non-zero element of the homology group), the construction gives $k$ parallel copies of the $(a,b)$ knot in $T^2$.



              Calegari's book on foliations says a little at the beginning about the relation between homotopy and isotopy in a surface: https://math.uchicago.edu/~dannyc/books/foliations/foliations.html






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                A torus link is any link that is isotopic into the standard unknotted torus in $S^3$ (the Clifford torus, if you like). So, the problem of torus link classification can start with the question of what are the possible links in $T^2$ itself, with all the isotopies restricted to the torus.



                Take a look at the section "Knots in the torus," starting on page 17 of Rolfsen's Knots and Links. A first step of link classification can be knot classification, i.e., the classification of simple closed curves in $T^2$. There are two main types: separating (equivalently, nullhomotopic or bounds-a-disk) and non-separating. The separating ones are just unknots, so let's exclude them. The non-separating curves are in one-to-one correspondence with non-divisible elements of $H_1(T^2)$, and if you choose a basis for $H_1(T^2)$ you get the pair-of-integers representation $(a,b)$ with $a,b$ coprime. Conceptually, the argument is that in the universal cover, the loop lifts to a path between integer points, and by a homotopy you can pull the line tight and it has rational slope.



                For links on a torus, you can use intersection numbers to see that all the components have to be parallel (meaning they all have the same slope). There is a standard construction to represent an arbitrary element of $H_1$ as a collection of simple closed curves, and in $T^2$ this element is unique up to isotopy. For $(ka,kb)in H_1(T^2)$ with $a,b$ coprime and $kgeq 1$ (which encompasses every non-zero element of the homology group), the construction gives $k$ parallel copies of the $(a,b)$ knot in $T^2$.



                Calegari's book on foliations says a little at the beginning about the relation between homotopy and isotopy in a surface: https://math.uchicago.edu/~dannyc/books/foliations/foliations.html






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                A torus link is any link that is isotopic into the standard unknotted torus in $S^3$ (the Clifford torus, if you like). So, the problem of torus link classification can start with the question of what are the possible links in $T^2$ itself, with all the isotopies restricted to the torus.



                Take a look at the section "Knots in the torus," starting on page 17 of Rolfsen's Knots and Links. A first step of link classification can be knot classification, i.e., the classification of simple closed curves in $T^2$. There are two main types: separating (equivalently, nullhomotopic or bounds-a-disk) and non-separating. The separating ones are just unknots, so let's exclude them. The non-separating curves are in one-to-one correspondence with non-divisible elements of $H_1(T^2)$, and if you choose a basis for $H_1(T^2)$ you get the pair-of-integers representation $(a,b)$ with $a,b$ coprime. Conceptually, the argument is that in the universal cover, the loop lifts to a path between integer points, and by a homotopy you can pull the line tight and it has rational slope.



                For links on a torus, you can use intersection numbers to see that all the components have to be parallel (meaning they all have the same slope). There is a standard construction to represent an arbitrary element of $H_1$ as a collection of simple closed curves, and in $T^2$ this element is unique up to isotopy. For $(ka,kb)in H_1(T^2)$ with $a,b$ coprime and $kgeq 1$ (which encompasses every non-zero element of the homology group), the construction gives $k$ parallel copies of the $(a,b)$ knot in $T^2$.



                Calegari's book on foliations says a little at the beginning about the relation between homotopy and isotopy in a surface: https://math.uchicago.edu/~dannyc/books/foliations/foliations.html







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 16 at 20:22









                Kyle MillerKyle Miller

                9,690930




                9,690930



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3149632%2fthe-order-of-a-torus-link-can-be-understood-as-a-rational-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye