Normal approximation of MLE of Poisson distribution and confidence intervalConfidence interval for Poisson distribution coefficientConfidence interval of the parameter of $exp$ and normal distribution from MLE?Determine the asymptotic distribution of $bar X_n$, properly centered and $sqrt n$ scaledConfidence interval; exponential distribution (normal or student approximation?)MLE and unbiased estimator of $PX_i=1$ given poisson distributionMLE of Poisson distribution with new observationconfidence interval when both $mu$ and $sigma^2$ are unknownMLE, Confidence Interval, and Asymptotic DistributionsConfidence interval for mean of non-normal distribution based on a small sampleIs Confidence Interval taken on one Random Sample or A Sampling Distribution

Which one is correct as adjective “protruding” or “protruded”?

What are the purposes of autoencoders?

Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?

Offered money to buy a house, seller is asking for more to cover gap between their listing and mortgage owed

Loading commands from file

Creature in Shazam mid-credits scene?

Are the IPv6 address space and IPv4 address space completely disjoint?

How can we generalize the fact of finite dimensional vector space to an infinte dimensional case?

Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?

why `nmap 192.168.1.97` returns less services than `nmap 127.0.0.1`?

Should I stop contributing to retirement accounts?

Lowest total scrabble score

Is there a single word describing earning money through any means?

Non-trope happy ending?

What is Cash Advance APR?

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name

Is it improper etiquette to ask your opponent what his/her rating is before the game?

Creepy dinosaur pc game identification

How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?

Why Shazam when there is already Superman?

Removing files under particular conditions (number of files, file age)

250 Floor Tower

How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?

WiFi Thermostat, No C Terminal on Furnace



Normal approximation of MLE of Poisson distribution and confidence interval


Confidence interval for Poisson distribution coefficientConfidence interval of the parameter of $exp$ and normal distribution from MLE?Determine the asymptotic distribution of $bar X_n$, properly centered and $sqrt n$ scaledConfidence interval; exponential distribution (normal or student approximation?)MLE and unbiased estimator of $PX_i=1$ given poisson distributionMLE of Poisson distribution with new observationconfidence interval when both $mu$ and $sigma^2$ are unknownMLE, Confidence Interval, and Asymptotic DistributionsConfidence interval for mean of non-normal distribution based on a small sampleIs Confidence Interval taken on one Random Sample or A Sampling Distribution













0












$begingroup$


Let $(X_1,ldots,X_n)$ denote a random sample from a Poisson distribution with parameter $lambda$.



Maximum Likelihood Estimate of $lambda$ is given by



$hatlambda = barX = frac1n sumlimits_i=1^n X_i$



a) Show that $fracbarX-musqrtlambda/nsim N(0,1)$ approx.



b) Using this normal approximation find the theoretical confidence interval with the $1-alpha/2$ quantile from the $N(0,1)$ distribution.




Thoughts: I'm quite stuck on problem a). I don't quite se om the MLE which is equal the the sample mean is relevant here but I am probably (most definitely) missing something. My only idea is to use CLT in some way since



$$fracbarX-musigma/sqrtn=fracbarX-musqrtlambda/n$$



as the variance of Poisson is just $lambda$. But from here I don't know what to do.... Can someone help me?



And for problem b) I have 0 ideas...










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    The result in part a) should be that $fracsqrtn(overline X-lambda)sqrtlambdastackrelasim N(0,1)$, which follows from Lindeberg-Lévy CLT. Using this in part b), you can get a confidence interval for $lambda$ from $overline X-z_alpha/2sqrtfracoverline Xn<lambda<overline X+z_alpha/2sqrt fracoverline Xn$ or consider a variance stabilising transform to find the C.I.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Mar 14 at 19:36
















0












$begingroup$


Let $(X_1,ldots,X_n)$ denote a random sample from a Poisson distribution with parameter $lambda$.



Maximum Likelihood Estimate of $lambda$ is given by



$hatlambda = barX = frac1n sumlimits_i=1^n X_i$



a) Show that $fracbarX-musqrtlambda/nsim N(0,1)$ approx.



b) Using this normal approximation find the theoretical confidence interval with the $1-alpha/2$ quantile from the $N(0,1)$ distribution.




Thoughts: I'm quite stuck on problem a). I don't quite se om the MLE which is equal the the sample mean is relevant here but I am probably (most definitely) missing something. My only idea is to use CLT in some way since



$$fracbarX-musigma/sqrtn=fracbarX-musqrtlambda/n$$



as the variance of Poisson is just $lambda$. But from here I don't know what to do.... Can someone help me?



And for problem b) I have 0 ideas...










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    The result in part a) should be that $fracsqrtn(overline X-lambda)sqrtlambdastackrelasim N(0,1)$, which follows from Lindeberg-Lévy CLT. Using this in part b), you can get a confidence interval for $lambda$ from $overline X-z_alpha/2sqrtfracoverline Xn<lambda<overline X+z_alpha/2sqrt fracoverline Xn$ or consider a variance stabilising transform to find the C.I.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Mar 14 at 19:36














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $(X_1,ldots,X_n)$ denote a random sample from a Poisson distribution with parameter $lambda$.



Maximum Likelihood Estimate of $lambda$ is given by



$hatlambda = barX = frac1n sumlimits_i=1^n X_i$



a) Show that $fracbarX-musqrtlambda/nsim N(0,1)$ approx.



b) Using this normal approximation find the theoretical confidence interval with the $1-alpha/2$ quantile from the $N(0,1)$ distribution.




Thoughts: I'm quite stuck on problem a). I don't quite se om the MLE which is equal the the sample mean is relevant here but I am probably (most definitely) missing something. My only idea is to use CLT in some way since



$$fracbarX-musigma/sqrtn=fracbarX-musqrtlambda/n$$



as the variance of Poisson is just $lambda$. But from here I don't know what to do.... Can someone help me?



And for problem b) I have 0 ideas...










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $(X_1,ldots,X_n)$ denote a random sample from a Poisson distribution with parameter $lambda$.



Maximum Likelihood Estimate of $lambda$ is given by



$hatlambda = barX = frac1n sumlimits_i=1^n X_i$



a) Show that $fracbarX-musqrtlambda/nsim N(0,1)$ approx.



b) Using this normal approximation find the theoretical confidence interval with the $1-alpha/2$ quantile from the $N(0,1)$ distribution.




Thoughts: I'm quite stuck on problem a). I don't quite se om the MLE which is equal the the sample mean is relevant here but I am probably (most definitely) missing something. My only idea is to use CLT in some way since



$$fracbarX-musigma/sqrtn=fracbarX-musqrtlambda/n$$



as the variance of Poisson is just $lambda$. But from here I don't know what to do.... Can someone help me?



And for problem b) I have 0 ideas...







statistics poisson-distribution central-limit-theorem confidence-interval






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 15 at 17:52









StubbornAtom

6,29831339




6,29831339










asked Mar 14 at 18:31









CruZCruZ

638




638











  • $begingroup$
    The result in part a) should be that $fracsqrtn(overline X-lambda)sqrtlambdastackrelasim N(0,1)$, which follows from Lindeberg-Lévy CLT. Using this in part b), you can get a confidence interval for $lambda$ from $overline X-z_alpha/2sqrtfracoverline Xn<lambda<overline X+z_alpha/2sqrt fracoverline Xn$ or consider a variance stabilising transform to find the C.I.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Mar 14 at 19:36

















  • $begingroup$
    The result in part a) should be that $fracsqrtn(overline X-lambda)sqrtlambdastackrelasim N(0,1)$, which follows from Lindeberg-Lévy CLT. Using this in part b), you can get a confidence interval for $lambda$ from $overline X-z_alpha/2sqrtfracoverline Xn<lambda<overline X+z_alpha/2sqrt fracoverline Xn$ or consider a variance stabilising transform to find the C.I.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Mar 14 at 19:36
















$begingroup$
The result in part a) should be that $fracsqrtn(overline X-lambda)sqrtlambdastackrelasim N(0,1)$, which follows from Lindeberg-Lévy CLT. Using this in part b), you can get a confidence interval for $lambda$ from $overline X-z_alpha/2sqrtfracoverline Xn<lambda<overline X+z_alpha/2sqrt fracoverline Xn$ or consider a variance stabilising transform to find the C.I.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Mar 14 at 19:36





$begingroup$
The result in part a) should be that $fracsqrtn(overline X-lambda)sqrtlambdastackrelasim N(0,1)$, which follows from Lindeberg-Lévy CLT. Using this in part b), you can get a confidence interval for $lambda$ from $overline X-z_alpha/2sqrtfracoverline Xn<lambda<overline X+z_alpha/2sqrt fracoverline Xn$ or consider a variance stabilising transform to find the C.I.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Mar 14 at 19:36











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

You have an answer in the comments, so just slightly formalizing it. For (a) you have $n$ i.i.d Poisson random variables, thus a finite second moment, hence by the CLT
$$
sqrtnfrac(barX - mathbbEX)sqrt Var(X) xrightarrowD N(0,1),
$$

in your case $mathbbEX = Var(X) = lambda$. Thus for any finite $n$,
$$
sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda approx N(0,1).
$$

For (b), using (a) you know that
$$
mathbbPleft(z_a/2 le sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda le z_1-a/2 right) approx 1 - a
$$

re-arranging the inequality you have
$$
mathbbPleft( barX - z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n le lambda le barX + z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n right) approx 1 - a,
$$

replace the $lambda$ with its estimator $barX$ in $sqrtlambda/n$ and you have the CI.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148353%2fnormal-approximation-of-mle-of-poisson-distribution-and-confidence-interval%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    You have an answer in the comments, so just slightly formalizing it. For (a) you have $n$ i.i.d Poisson random variables, thus a finite second moment, hence by the CLT
    $$
    sqrtnfrac(barX - mathbbEX)sqrt Var(X) xrightarrowD N(0,1),
    $$

    in your case $mathbbEX = Var(X) = lambda$. Thus for any finite $n$,
    $$
    sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda approx N(0,1).
    $$

    For (b), using (a) you know that
    $$
    mathbbPleft(z_a/2 le sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda le z_1-a/2 right) approx 1 - a
    $$

    re-arranging the inequality you have
    $$
    mathbbPleft( barX - z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n le lambda le barX + z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n right) approx 1 - a,
    $$

    replace the $lambda$ with its estimator $barX$ in $sqrtlambda/n$ and you have the CI.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      You have an answer in the comments, so just slightly formalizing it. For (a) you have $n$ i.i.d Poisson random variables, thus a finite second moment, hence by the CLT
      $$
      sqrtnfrac(barX - mathbbEX)sqrt Var(X) xrightarrowD N(0,1),
      $$

      in your case $mathbbEX = Var(X) = lambda$. Thus for any finite $n$,
      $$
      sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda approx N(0,1).
      $$

      For (b), using (a) you know that
      $$
      mathbbPleft(z_a/2 le sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda le z_1-a/2 right) approx 1 - a
      $$

      re-arranging the inequality you have
      $$
      mathbbPleft( barX - z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n le lambda le barX + z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n right) approx 1 - a,
      $$

      replace the $lambda$ with its estimator $barX$ in $sqrtlambda/n$ and you have the CI.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        You have an answer in the comments, so just slightly formalizing it. For (a) you have $n$ i.i.d Poisson random variables, thus a finite second moment, hence by the CLT
        $$
        sqrtnfrac(barX - mathbbEX)sqrt Var(X) xrightarrowD N(0,1),
        $$

        in your case $mathbbEX = Var(X) = lambda$. Thus for any finite $n$,
        $$
        sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda approx N(0,1).
        $$

        For (b), using (a) you know that
        $$
        mathbbPleft(z_a/2 le sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda le z_1-a/2 right) approx 1 - a
        $$

        re-arranging the inequality you have
        $$
        mathbbPleft( barX - z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n le lambda le barX + z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n right) approx 1 - a,
        $$

        replace the $lambda$ with its estimator $barX$ in $sqrtlambda/n$ and you have the CI.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        You have an answer in the comments, so just slightly formalizing it. For (a) you have $n$ i.i.d Poisson random variables, thus a finite second moment, hence by the CLT
        $$
        sqrtnfrac(barX - mathbbEX)sqrt Var(X) xrightarrowD N(0,1),
        $$

        in your case $mathbbEX = Var(X) = lambda$. Thus for any finite $n$,
        $$
        sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda approx N(0,1).
        $$

        For (b), using (a) you know that
        $$
        mathbbPleft(z_a/2 le sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda le z_1-a/2 right) approx 1 - a
        $$

        re-arranging the inequality you have
        $$
        mathbbPleft( barX - z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n le lambda le barX + z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n right) approx 1 - a,
        $$

        replace the $lambda$ with its estimator $barX$ in $sqrtlambda/n$ and you have the CI.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 15 at 19:22









        V. VancakV. Vancak

        11.4k3926




        11.4k3926



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148353%2fnormal-approximation-of-mle-of-poisson-distribution-and-confidence-interval%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer