Normal approximation of MLE of Poisson distribution and confidence intervalConfidence interval for Poisson distribution coefficientConfidence interval of the parameter of $exp$ and normal distribution from MLE?Determine the asymptotic distribution of $bar X_n$, properly centered and $sqrt n$ scaledConfidence interval; exponential distribution (normal or student approximation?)MLE and unbiased estimator of $PX_i=1$ given poisson distributionMLE of Poisson distribution with new observationconfidence interval when both $mu$ and $sigma^2$ are unknownMLE, Confidence Interval, and Asymptotic DistributionsConfidence interval for mean of non-normal distribution based on a small sampleIs Confidence Interval taken on one Random Sample or A Sampling Distribution
Which one is correct as adjective “protruding” or “protruded”?
What are the purposes of autoencoders?
Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?
Offered money to buy a house, seller is asking for more to cover gap between their listing and mortgage owed
Loading commands from file
Creature in Shazam mid-credits scene?
Are the IPv6 address space and IPv4 address space completely disjoint?
How can we generalize the fact of finite dimensional vector space to an infinte dimensional case?
Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?
why `nmap 192.168.1.97` returns less services than `nmap 127.0.0.1`?
Should I stop contributing to retirement accounts?
Lowest total scrabble score
Is there a single word describing earning money through any means?
Non-trope happy ending?
What is Cash Advance APR?
Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name
Is it improper etiquette to ask your opponent what his/her rating is before the game?
Creepy dinosaur pc game identification
How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?
Why Shazam when there is already Superman?
Removing files under particular conditions (number of files, file age)
250 Floor Tower
How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?
WiFi Thermostat, No C Terminal on Furnace
Normal approximation of MLE of Poisson distribution and confidence interval
Confidence interval for Poisson distribution coefficientConfidence interval of the parameter of $exp$ and normal distribution from MLE?Determine the asymptotic distribution of $bar X_n$, properly centered and $sqrt n$ scaledConfidence interval; exponential distribution (normal or student approximation?)MLE and unbiased estimator of $PX_i=1$ given poisson distributionMLE of Poisson distribution with new observationconfidence interval when both $mu$ and $sigma^2$ are unknownMLE, Confidence Interval, and Asymptotic DistributionsConfidence interval for mean of non-normal distribution based on a small sampleIs Confidence Interval taken on one Random Sample or A Sampling Distribution
$begingroup$
Let $(X_1,ldots,X_n)$ denote a random sample from a Poisson distribution with parameter $lambda$.
Maximum Likelihood Estimate of $lambda$ is given by
$hatlambda = barX = frac1n sumlimits_i=1^n X_i$
a) Show that $fracbarX-musqrtlambda/nsim N(0,1)$ approx.
b) Using this normal approximation find the theoretical confidence interval with the $1-alpha/2$ quantile from the $N(0,1)$ distribution.
Thoughts: I'm quite stuck on problem a). I don't quite se om the MLE which is equal the the sample mean is relevant here but I am probably (most definitely) missing something. My only idea is to use CLT in some way since
$$fracbarX-musigma/sqrtn=fracbarX-musqrtlambda/n$$
as the variance of Poisson is just $lambda$. But from here I don't know what to do.... Can someone help me?
And for problem b) I have 0 ideas...
statistics poisson-distribution central-limit-theorem confidence-interval
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(X_1,ldots,X_n)$ denote a random sample from a Poisson distribution with parameter $lambda$.
Maximum Likelihood Estimate of $lambda$ is given by
$hatlambda = barX = frac1n sumlimits_i=1^n X_i$
a) Show that $fracbarX-musqrtlambda/nsim N(0,1)$ approx.
b) Using this normal approximation find the theoretical confidence interval with the $1-alpha/2$ quantile from the $N(0,1)$ distribution.
Thoughts: I'm quite stuck on problem a). I don't quite se om the MLE which is equal the the sample mean is relevant here but I am probably (most definitely) missing something. My only idea is to use CLT in some way since
$$fracbarX-musigma/sqrtn=fracbarX-musqrtlambda/n$$
as the variance of Poisson is just $lambda$. But from here I don't know what to do.... Can someone help me?
And for problem b) I have 0 ideas...
statistics poisson-distribution central-limit-theorem confidence-interval
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The result in part a) should be that $fracsqrtn(overline X-lambda)sqrtlambdastackrelasim N(0,1)$, which follows from Lindeberg-Lévy CLT. Using this in part b), you can get a confidence interval for $lambda$ from $overline X-z_alpha/2sqrtfracoverline Xn<lambda<overline X+z_alpha/2sqrt fracoverline Xn$ or consider a variance stabilising transform to find the C.I.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Mar 14 at 19:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(X_1,ldots,X_n)$ denote a random sample from a Poisson distribution with parameter $lambda$.
Maximum Likelihood Estimate of $lambda$ is given by
$hatlambda = barX = frac1n sumlimits_i=1^n X_i$
a) Show that $fracbarX-musqrtlambda/nsim N(0,1)$ approx.
b) Using this normal approximation find the theoretical confidence interval with the $1-alpha/2$ quantile from the $N(0,1)$ distribution.
Thoughts: I'm quite stuck on problem a). I don't quite se om the MLE which is equal the the sample mean is relevant here but I am probably (most definitely) missing something. My only idea is to use CLT in some way since
$$fracbarX-musigma/sqrtn=fracbarX-musqrtlambda/n$$
as the variance of Poisson is just $lambda$. But from here I don't know what to do.... Can someone help me?
And for problem b) I have 0 ideas...
statistics poisson-distribution central-limit-theorem confidence-interval
$endgroup$
Let $(X_1,ldots,X_n)$ denote a random sample from a Poisson distribution with parameter $lambda$.
Maximum Likelihood Estimate of $lambda$ is given by
$hatlambda = barX = frac1n sumlimits_i=1^n X_i$
a) Show that $fracbarX-musqrtlambda/nsim N(0,1)$ approx.
b) Using this normal approximation find the theoretical confidence interval with the $1-alpha/2$ quantile from the $N(0,1)$ distribution.
Thoughts: I'm quite stuck on problem a). I don't quite se om the MLE which is equal the the sample mean is relevant here but I am probably (most definitely) missing something. My only idea is to use CLT in some way since
$$fracbarX-musigma/sqrtn=fracbarX-musqrtlambda/n$$
as the variance of Poisson is just $lambda$. But from here I don't know what to do.... Can someone help me?
And for problem b) I have 0 ideas...
statistics poisson-distribution central-limit-theorem confidence-interval
statistics poisson-distribution central-limit-theorem confidence-interval
edited Mar 15 at 17:52
StubbornAtom
6,29831339
6,29831339
asked Mar 14 at 18:31
CruZCruZ
638
638
$begingroup$
The result in part a) should be that $fracsqrtn(overline X-lambda)sqrtlambdastackrelasim N(0,1)$, which follows from Lindeberg-Lévy CLT. Using this in part b), you can get a confidence interval for $lambda$ from $overline X-z_alpha/2sqrtfracoverline Xn<lambda<overline X+z_alpha/2sqrt fracoverline Xn$ or consider a variance stabilising transform to find the C.I.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Mar 14 at 19:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The result in part a) should be that $fracsqrtn(overline X-lambda)sqrtlambdastackrelasim N(0,1)$, which follows from Lindeberg-Lévy CLT. Using this in part b), you can get a confidence interval for $lambda$ from $overline X-z_alpha/2sqrtfracoverline Xn<lambda<overline X+z_alpha/2sqrt fracoverline Xn$ or consider a variance stabilising transform to find the C.I.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Mar 14 at 19:36
$begingroup$
The result in part a) should be that $fracsqrtn(overline X-lambda)sqrtlambdastackrelasim N(0,1)$, which follows from Lindeberg-Lévy CLT. Using this in part b), you can get a confidence interval for $lambda$ from $overline X-z_alpha/2sqrtfracoverline Xn<lambda<overline X+z_alpha/2sqrt fracoverline Xn$ or consider a variance stabilising transform to find the C.I.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Mar 14 at 19:36
$begingroup$
The result in part a) should be that $fracsqrtn(overline X-lambda)sqrtlambdastackrelasim N(0,1)$, which follows from Lindeberg-Lévy CLT. Using this in part b), you can get a confidence interval for $lambda$ from $overline X-z_alpha/2sqrtfracoverline Xn<lambda<overline X+z_alpha/2sqrt fracoverline Xn$ or consider a variance stabilising transform to find the C.I.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Mar 14 at 19:36
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You have an answer in the comments, so just slightly formalizing it. For (a) you have $n$ i.i.d Poisson random variables, thus a finite second moment, hence by the CLT
$$
sqrtnfrac(barX - mathbbEX)sqrt Var(X) xrightarrowD N(0,1),
$$
in your case $mathbbEX = Var(X) = lambda$. Thus for any finite $n$,
$$
sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda approx N(0,1).
$$
For (b), using (a) you know that
$$
mathbbPleft(z_a/2 le sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda le z_1-a/2 right) approx 1 - a
$$
re-arranging the inequality you have
$$
mathbbPleft( barX - z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n le lambda le barX + z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n right) approx 1 - a,
$$
replace the $lambda$ with its estimator $barX$ in $sqrtlambda/n$ and you have the CI.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148353%2fnormal-approximation-of-mle-of-poisson-distribution-and-confidence-interval%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You have an answer in the comments, so just slightly formalizing it. For (a) you have $n$ i.i.d Poisson random variables, thus a finite second moment, hence by the CLT
$$
sqrtnfrac(barX - mathbbEX)sqrt Var(X) xrightarrowD N(0,1),
$$
in your case $mathbbEX = Var(X) = lambda$. Thus for any finite $n$,
$$
sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda approx N(0,1).
$$
For (b), using (a) you know that
$$
mathbbPleft(z_a/2 le sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda le z_1-a/2 right) approx 1 - a
$$
re-arranging the inequality you have
$$
mathbbPleft( barX - z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n le lambda le barX + z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n right) approx 1 - a,
$$
replace the $lambda$ with its estimator $barX$ in $sqrtlambda/n$ and you have the CI.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You have an answer in the comments, so just slightly formalizing it. For (a) you have $n$ i.i.d Poisson random variables, thus a finite second moment, hence by the CLT
$$
sqrtnfrac(barX - mathbbEX)sqrt Var(X) xrightarrowD N(0,1),
$$
in your case $mathbbEX = Var(X) = lambda$. Thus for any finite $n$,
$$
sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda approx N(0,1).
$$
For (b), using (a) you know that
$$
mathbbPleft(z_a/2 le sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda le z_1-a/2 right) approx 1 - a
$$
re-arranging the inequality you have
$$
mathbbPleft( barX - z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n le lambda le barX + z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n right) approx 1 - a,
$$
replace the $lambda$ with its estimator $barX$ in $sqrtlambda/n$ and you have the CI.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You have an answer in the comments, so just slightly formalizing it. For (a) you have $n$ i.i.d Poisson random variables, thus a finite second moment, hence by the CLT
$$
sqrtnfrac(barX - mathbbEX)sqrt Var(X) xrightarrowD N(0,1),
$$
in your case $mathbbEX = Var(X) = lambda$. Thus for any finite $n$,
$$
sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda approx N(0,1).
$$
For (b), using (a) you know that
$$
mathbbPleft(z_a/2 le sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda le z_1-a/2 right) approx 1 - a
$$
re-arranging the inequality you have
$$
mathbbPleft( barX - z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n le lambda le barX + z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n right) approx 1 - a,
$$
replace the $lambda$ with its estimator $barX$ in $sqrtlambda/n$ and you have the CI.
$endgroup$
You have an answer in the comments, so just slightly formalizing it. For (a) you have $n$ i.i.d Poisson random variables, thus a finite second moment, hence by the CLT
$$
sqrtnfrac(barX - mathbbEX)sqrt Var(X) xrightarrowD N(0,1),
$$
in your case $mathbbEX = Var(X) = lambda$. Thus for any finite $n$,
$$
sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda approx N(0,1).
$$
For (b), using (a) you know that
$$
mathbbPleft(z_a/2 le sqrtnfrac(barX - lambda )sqrt lambda le z_1-a/2 right) approx 1 - a
$$
re-arranging the inequality you have
$$
mathbbPleft( barX - z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n le lambda le barX + z_1-a/2sqrtlambda/n right) approx 1 - a,
$$
replace the $lambda$ with its estimator $barX$ in $sqrtlambda/n$ and you have the CI.
answered Mar 15 at 19:22
V. VancakV. Vancak
11.4k3926
11.4k3926
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148353%2fnormal-approximation-of-mle-of-poisson-distribution-and-confidence-interval%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The result in part a) should be that $fracsqrtn(overline X-lambda)sqrtlambdastackrelasim N(0,1)$, which follows from Lindeberg-Lévy CLT. Using this in part b), you can get a confidence interval for $lambda$ from $overline X-z_alpha/2sqrtfracoverline Xn<lambda<overline X+z_alpha/2sqrt fracoverline Xn$ or consider a variance stabilising transform to find the C.I.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Mar 14 at 19:36