Fibonacci elegance sought for $F_f (n) + F_f(n)-1$Solving Fibonaccis Term Using Golden Ratio ConverganceFibonacci nth termNeed formula for sequence related to Lucas/Fibonacci numbersFibonacci numbers and golden ratio: $Phi = lim sqrt[n]F_n$How is the Binet's formula for Fibonacci reversed in order to find the index for a given Fibonacci number?Fibonacci-related sumHow does one arrive at a certain expression for the Fibonacci Zeta function?Solve for n in golden ratio fibonacci equationWhat is the connection and the difference between the Golden Ratio and Fibonacci Sequence?Powers of the golden ratio
Start making guitar arrangements
Where does the bonus feat in the cleric starting package come from?
Which one is correct as adjective “protruding” or “protruded”?
How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?
What are the purposes of autoencoders?
copy and scale one figure (wheel)
Travelling outside the UK without a passport
250 Floor Tower
GraphicsGrid with a Label for each Column and Row
WiFi Thermostat, No C Terminal on Furnace
Why did the HMS Bounty go back to a time when whales are already rare?
How to indicate a cut out for a product window
Is it safe to use olive oil to clean the ear wax?
On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?
How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?
How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character
Not using 's' for he/she/it
Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?
What prevents the use of a multi-segment ILS for non-straight approaches?
How to bake one texture for one mesh with multiple textures blender 2.8
Is there a name for this algorithm to calculate the concentration of a mixture of two solutions containing the same solute?
What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?
If a character has darkvision, can they see through an area of nonmagical darkness filled with lightly obscuring gas?
Is there a working SACD iso player for Ubuntu?
Fibonacci elegance sought for $F_f (n) + F_f(n)-1$
Solving Fibonaccis Term Using Golden Ratio ConverganceFibonacci nth termNeed formula for sequence related to Lucas/Fibonacci numbersFibonacci numbers and golden ratio: $Phi = lim sqrt[n]F_n$How is the Binet's formula for Fibonacci reversed in order to find the index for a given Fibonacci number?Fibonacci-related sumHow does one arrive at a certain expression for the Fibonacci Zeta function?Solve for n in golden ratio fibonacci equationWhat is the connection and the difference between the Golden Ratio and Fibonacci Sequence?Powers of the golden ratio
$begingroup$
Updated on Friday 15th March 2019 at 5 pm in the light of comments received over the last 24 hours.
The original question was; given the well known variation of Binet's Formula:
$$F_n = fracphi^n - (-phi)^-nsqrt5$$
Derive an elegant expression, should one exist, for;
$$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1$$
Of course,
$$phi=frac1+sqrt52$$
Wolfgang Kais has pointed out that this is going to run into technical issues with raising negative numbers to the power of $log(n)$.
Consequently, initially at least, I've been looking instead at
$$F_f(n) + F_f(n)-1$$
where the function $f$ is sufficiently well behaved to not run into such issues.
In this case,
$$ (sqrt5)(F_f(n) + F_f(n)-1)=phi^f(n)-(-phi)^-f(n)+ phi^f(n)-1-(-phi)^-(f(n)-1)$$
Using the two equivalent facts that
$$1-phi=- frac1phi :or: phi=1+frac1phi$$
I proceeded as follows;
$$ (sqrt5)(F_f(n) + F_f(n)-1)=phi^f(n)-big(-frac1phibig)^f(n)+ phi^f(n) times phi^-1-big(-frac1phibig)^(f(n)-1)$$
$$ =phi^f(n)-(1-phi)^f(n)+ fracphi^f(n)phi-big(-frac1phibig)^f(n) times big(-frac1phibig)^-1$$
$$ =phi^f(n)big(1+frac1phibig)-(1-phi)^f(n)-(1-phi)^f(n) times (-phi)$$
$$ =phi times phi^f(n) - (1-phi) times (1-phi)^f(n)$$
Wolfgang Kais suggested immediately starting with the Fibonacci recurrence relation
$$F_m=F_m-1+F_m-2$$
from which I deduce that
$$F_f(n)+F_f(n)-1=F_f(n)+1$$
Now, applying the variation on Binet's Formula,
$$F_f(n)+1 = fracphi^f(n)+1 - (-phi)^-(f(n)+1)sqrt5$$
$$(sqrt5)(F_f(n)+1) = phi times phi^f(n) - big(-frac1phibig)^f(n)+1$$
$$ = phi times phi^f(n) - (1-phi)^f(n)+1$$
$$ =phi times phi^f(n) - (1-phi) times (1-phi)^f(n)$$
which is the same result as obtained previously which, if nothing else, shows that the variation on Binet's formula satisfies the Fibonacci Recurrence relation.
I'm curious to know if
$$ F_f(n)+1 = fracphi times phi^f(n)sqrt5 - frac(1-phi) times (1-phi)^f(n)sqrt5$$
is of any use, and is it the best that can be done ?
Possibly I've exhausted what can usefully be done with this question, as I can't see the point of introducing the $log(n)$ function, given the technical hurdles it immediately throws up.
However, any further thoughts are most welcome.
The question originally came from a friend yesterday.
The earlier ask is here : how can i place then values = F(logn)+F(logn-1) in golden ratio Fibonacci series?lognflogn-1-in-golden-ratio-fibonacci-series
elementary-number-theory fibonacci-numbers golden-ratio
$endgroup$
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Updated on Friday 15th March 2019 at 5 pm in the light of comments received over the last 24 hours.
The original question was; given the well known variation of Binet's Formula:
$$F_n = fracphi^n - (-phi)^-nsqrt5$$
Derive an elegant expression, should one exist, for;
$$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1$$
Of course,
$$phi=frac1+sqrt52$$
Wolfgang Kais has pointed out that this is going to run into technical issues with raising negative numbers to the power of $log(n)$.
Consequently, initially at least, I've been looking instead at
$$F_f(n) + F_f(n)-1$$
where the function $f$ is sufficiently well behaved to not run into such issues.
In this case,
$$ (sqrt5)(F_f(n) + F_f(n)-1)=phi^f(n)-(-phi)^-f(n)+ phi^f(n)-1-(-phi)^-(f(n)-1)$$
Using the two equivalent facts that
$$1-phi=- frac1phi :or: phi=1+frac1phi$$
I proceeded as follows;
$$ (sqrt5)(F_f(n) + F_f(n)-1)=phi^f(n)-big(-frac1phibig)^f(n)+ phi^f(n) times phi^-1-big(-frac1phibig)^(f(n)-1)$$
$$ =phi^f(n)-(1-phi)^f(n)+ fracphi^f(n)phi-big(-frac1phibig)^f(n) times big(-frac1phibig)^-1$$
$$ =phi^f(n)big(1+frac1phibig)-(1-phi)^f(n)-(1-phi)^f(n) times (-phi)$$
$$ =phi times phi^f(n) - (1-phi) times (1-phi)^f(n)$$
Wolfgang Kais suggested immediately starting with the Fibonacci recurrence relation
$$F_m=F_m-1+F_m-2$$
from which I deduce that
$$F_f(n)+F_f(n)-1=F_f(n)+1$$
Now, applying the variation on Binet's Formula,
$$F_f(n)+1 = fracphi^f(n)+1 - (-phi)^-(f(n)+1)sqrt5$$
$$(sqrt5)(F_f(n)+1) = phi times phi^f(n) - big(-frac1phibig)^f(n)+1$$
$$ = phi times phi^f(n) - (1-phi)^f(n)+1$$
$$ =phi times phi^f(n) - (1-phi) times (1-phi)^f(n)$$
which is the same result as obtained previously which, if nothing else, shows that the variation on Binet's formula satisfies the Fibonacci Recurrence relation.
I'm curious to know if
$$ F_f(n)+1 = fracphi times phi^f(n)sqrt5 - frac(1-phi) times (1-phi)^f(n)sqrt5$$
is of any use, and is it the best that can be done ?
Possibly I've exhausted what can usefully be done with this question, as I can't see the point of introducing the $log(n)$ function, given the technical hurdles it immediately throws up.
However, any further thoughts are most welcome.
The question originally came from a friend yesterday.
The earlier ask is here : how can i place then values = F(logn)+F(logn-1) in golden ratio Fibonacci series?lognflogn-1-in-golden-ratio-fibonacci-series
elementary-number-theory fibonacci-numbers golden-ratio
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Note the same basic question was asked about $2$ hours earlier at how can i place then values = F(logn)+F(logn-1) in golden ratio Fibonacci series?. I appreciate you leaving a comment on the other question about you asking it here, but you should also mention that somewhere in this new question. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Mar 14 at 22:28
2
$begingroup$
As you can't take a negative number to a non-integer power, $log(n)$ will have to be an integer, and so $F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = F_log(n)+1$.
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang Kais
Mar 15 at 0:28
1
$begingroup$
@Wolfgang Kais : Of course ! And if I use that in the Binet formula I can get to $$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi times phi^log (n)-(1-phi) times (1- phi)^log(n)sqrt5$$ which is so similar to the expression I mention in my question that I think I have a single minus sign error and so have $phi^2$ instead of $(1 - phi)$. I'll try to reconcile the two methods tomorrow. Thanks !
$endgroup$
– Martin Hansen
Mar 15 at 1:21
1
$begingroup$
You can also try and use the identity $$x^log a=a^log x.$$ Unfortunately that requires careful interpretation of complex powers unless $a$ and $x$ are both positive real numbers. It does give you a simple estimate for the sum.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 15 at 8:16
1
$begingroup$
@MartinHansen: $1-phi$ is also negative. How will you define $(-1)^log 2$?
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang Kais
Mar 15 at 8:56
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Updated on Friday 15th March 2019 at 5 pm in the light of comments received over the last 24 hours.
The original question was; given the well known variation of Binet's Formula:
$$F_n = fracphi^n - (-phi)^-nsqrt5$$
Derive an elegant expression, should one exist, for;
$$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1$$
Of course,
$$phi=frac1+sqrt52$$
Wolfgang Kais has pointed out that this is going to run into technical issues with raising negative numbers to the power of $log(n)$.
Consequently, initially at least, I've been looking instead at
$$F_f(n) + F_f(n)-1$$
where the function $f$ is sufficiently well behaved to not run into such issues.
In this case,
$$ (sqrt5)(F_f(n) + F_f(n)-1)=phi^f(n)-(-phi)^-f(n)+ phi^f(n)-1-(-phi)^-(f(n)-1)$$
Using the two equivalent facts that
$$1-phi=- frac1phi :or: phi=1+frac1phi$$
I proceeded as follows;
$$ (sqrt5)(F_f(n) + F_f(n)-1)=phi^f(n)-big(-frac1phibig)^f(n)+ phi^f(n) times phi^-1-big(-frac1phibig)^(f(n)-1)$$
$$ =phi^f(n)-(1-phi)^f(n)+ fracphi^f(n)phi-big(-frac1phibig)^f(n) times big(-frac1phibig)^-1$$
$$ =phi^f(n)big(1+frac1phibig)-(1-phi)^f(n)-(1-phi)^f(n) times (-phi)$$
$$ =phi times phi^f(n) - (1-phi) times (1-phi)^f(n)$$
Wolfgang Kais suggested immediately starting with the Fibonacci recurrence relation
$$F_m=F_m-1+F_m-2$$
from which I deduce that
$$F_f(n)+F_f(n)-1=F_f(n)+1$$
Now, applying the variation on Binet's Formula,
$$F_f(n)+1 = fracphi^f(n)+1 - (-phi)^-(f(n)+1)sqrt5$$
$$(sqrt5)(F_f(n)+1) = phi times phi^f(n) - big(-frac1phibig)^f(n)+1$$
$$ = phi times phi^f(n) - (1-phi)^f(n)+1$$
$$ =phi times phi^f(n) - (1-phi) times (1-phi)^f(n)$$
which is the same result as obtained previously which, if nothing else, shows that the variation on Binet's formula satisfies the Fibonacci Recurrence relation.
I'm curious to know if
$$ F_f(n)+1 = fracphi times phi^f(n)sqrt5 - frac(1-phi) times (1-phi)^f(n)sqrt5$$
is of any use, and is it the best that can be done ?
Possibly I've exhausted what can usefully be done with this question, as I can't see the point of introducing the $log(n)$ function, given the technical hurdles it immediately throws up.
However, any further thoughts are most welcome.
The question originally came from a friend yesterday.
The earlier ask is here : how can i place then values = F(logn)+F(logn-1) in golden ratio Fibonacci series?lognflogn-1-in-golden-ratio-fibonacci-series
elementary-number-theory fibonacci-numbers golden-ratio
$endgroup$
Updated on Friday 15th March 2019 at 5 pm in the light of comments received over the last 24 hours.
The original question was; given the well known variation of Binet's Formula:
$$F_n = fracphi^n - (-phi)^-nsqrt5$$
Derive an elegant expression, should one exist, for;
$$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1$$
Of course,
$$phi=frac1+sqrt52$$
Wolfgang Kais has pointed out that this is going to run into technical issues with raising negative numbers to the power of $log(n)$.
Consequently, initially at least, I've been looking instead at
$$F_f(n) + F_f(n)-1$$
where the function $f$ is sufficiently well behaved to not run into such issues.
In this case,
$$ (sqrt5)(F_f(n) + F_f(n)-1)=phi^f(n)-(-phi)^-f(n)+ phi^f(n)-1-(-phi)^-(f(n)-1)$$
Using the two equivalent facts that
$$1-phi=- frac1phi :or: phi=1+frac1phi$$
I proceeded as follows;
$$ (sqrt5)(F_f(n) + F_f(n)-1)=phi^f(n)-big(-frac1phibig)^f(n)+ phi^f(n) times phi^-1-big(-frac1phibig)^(f(n)-1)$$
$$ =phi^f(n)-(1-phi)^f(n)+ fracphi^f(n)phi-big(-frac1phibig)^f(n) times big(-frac1phibig)^-1$$
$$ =phi^f(n)big(1+frac1phibig)-(1-phi)^f(n)-(1-phi)^f(n) times (-phi)$$
$$ =phi times phi^f(n) - (1-phi) times (1-phi)^f(n)$$
Wolfgang Kais suggested immediately starting with the Fibonacci recurrence relation
$$F_m=F_m-1+F_m-2$$
from which I deduce that
$$F_f(n)+F_f(n)-1=F_f(n)+1$$
Now, applying the variation on Binet's Formula,
$$F_f(n)+1 = fracphi^f(n)+1 - (-phi)^-(f(n)+1)sqrt5$$
$$(sqrt5)(F_f(n)+1) = phi times phi^f(n) - big(-frac1phibig)^f(n)+1$$
$$ = phi times phi^f(n) - (1-phi)^f(n)+1$$
$$ =phi times phi^f(n) - (1-phi) times (1-phi)^f(n)$$
which is the same result as obtained previously which, if nothing else, shows that the variation on Binet's formula satisfies the Fibonacci Recurrence relation.
I'm curious to know if
$$ F_f(n)+1 = fracphi times phi^f(n)sqrt5 - frac(1-phi) times (1-phi)^f(n)sqrt5$$
is of any use, and is it the best that can be done ?
Possibly I've exhausted what can usefully be done with this question, as I can't see the point of introducing the $log(n)$ function, given the technical hurdles it immediately throws up.
However, any further thoughts are most welcome.
The question originally came from a friend yesterday.
The earlier ask is here : how can i place then values = F(logn)+F(logn-1) in golden ratio Fibonacci series?lognflogn-1-in-golden-ratio-fibonacci-series
elementary-number-theory fibonacci-numbers golden-ratio
elementary-number-theory fibonacci-numbers golden-ratio
edited Mar 15 at 17:22
Martin Hansen
asked Mar 14 at 22:19
Martin HansenMartin Hansen
720114
720114
1
$begingroup$
Note the same basic question was asked about $2$ hours earlier at how can i place then values = F(logn)+F(logn-1) in golden ratio Fibonacci series?. I appreciate you leaving a comment on the other question about you asking it here, but you should also mention that somewhere in this new question. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Mar 14 at 22:28
2
$begingroup$
As you can't take a negative number to a non-integer power, $log(n)$ will have to be an integer, and so $F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = F_log(n)+1$.
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang Kais
Mar 15 at 0:28
1
$begingroup$
@Wolfgang Kais : Of course ! And if I use that in the Binet formula I can get to $$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi times phi^log (n)-(1-phi) times (1- phi)^log(n)sqrt5$$ which is so similar to the expression I mention in my question that I think I have a single minus sign error and so have $phi^2$ instead of $(1 - phi)$. I'll try to reconcile the two methods tomorrow. Thanks !
$endgroup$
– Martin Hansen
Mar 15 at 1:21
1
$begingroup$
You can also try and use the identity $$x^log a=a^log x.$$ Unfortunately that requires careful interpretation of complex powers unless $a$ and $x$ are both positive real numbers. It does give you a simple estimate for the sum.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 15 at 8:16
1
$begingroup$
@MartinHansen: $1-phi$ is also negative. How will you define $(-1)^log 2$?
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang Kais
Mar 15 at 8:56
|
show 5 more comments
1
$begingroup$
Note the same basic question was asked about $2$ hours earlier at how can i place then values = F(logn)+F(logn-1) in golden ratio Fibonacci series?. I appreciate you leaving a comment on the other question about you asking it here, but you should also mention that somewhere in this new question. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Mar 14 at 22:28
2
$begingroup$
As you can't take a negative number to a non-integer power, $log(n)$ will have to be an integer, and so $F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = F_log(n)+1$.
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang Kais
Mar 15 at 0:28
1
$begingroup$
@Wolfgang Kais : Of course ! And if I use that in the Binet formula I can get to $$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi times phi^log (n)-(1-phi) times (1- phi)^log(n)sqrt5$$ which is so similar to the expression I mention in my question that I think I have a single minus sign error and so have $phi^2$ instead of $(1 - phi)$. I'll try to reconcile the two methods tomorrow. Thanks !
$endgroup$
– Martin Hansen
Mar 15 at 1:21
1
$begingroup$
You can also try and use the identity $$x^log a=a^log x.$$ Unfortunately that requires careful interpretation of complex powers unless $a$ and $x$ are both positive real numbers. It does give you a simple estimate for the sum.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 15 at 8:16
1
$begingroup$
@MartinHansen: $1-phi$ is also negative. How will you define $(-1)^log 2$?
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang Kais
Mar 15 at 8:56
1
1
$begingroup$
Note the same basic question was asked about $2$ hours earlier at how can i place then values = F(logn)+F(logn-1) in golden ratio Fibonacci series?. I appreciate you leaving a comment on the other question about you asking it here, but you should also mention that somewhere in this new question. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Mar 14 at 22:28
$begingroup$
Note the same basic question was asked about $2$ hours earlier at how can i place then values = F(logn)+F(logn-1) in golden ratio Fibonacci series?. I appreciate you leaving a comment on the other question about you asking it here, but you should also mention that somewhere in this new question. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Mar 14 at 22:28
2
2
$begingroup$
As you can't take a negative number to a non-integer power, $log(n)$ will have to be an integer, and so $F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = F_log(n)+1$.
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang Kais
Mar 15 at 0:28
$begingroup$
As you can't take a negative number to a non-integer power, $log(n)$ will have to be an integer, and so $F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = F_log(n)+1$.
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang Kais
Mar 15 at 0:28
1
1
$begingroup$
@Wolfgang Kais : Of course ! And if I use that in the Binet formula I can get to $$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi times phi^log (n)-(1-phi) times (1- phi)^log(n)sqrt5$$ which is so similar to the expression I mention in my question that I think I have a single minus sign error and so have $phi^2$ instead of $(1 - phi)$. I'll try to reconcile the two methods tomorrow. Thanks !
$endgroup$
– Martin Hansen
Mar 15 at 1:21
$begingroup$
@Wolfgang Kais : Of course ! And if I use that in the Binet formula I can get to $$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi times phi^log (n)-(1-phi) times (1- phi)^log(n)sqrt5$$ which is so similar to the expression I mention in my question that I think I have a single minus sign error and so have $phi^2$ instead of $(1 - phi)$. I'll try to reconcile the two methods tomorrow. Thanks !
$endgroup$
– Martin Hansen
Mar 15 at 1:21
1
1
$begingroup$
You can also try and use the identity $$x^log a=a^log x.$$ Unfortunately that requires careful interpretation of complex powers unless $a$ and $x$ are both positive real numbers. It does give you a simple estimate for the sum.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 15 at 8:16
$begingroup$
You can also try and use the identity $$x^log a=a^log x.$$ Unfortunately that requires careful interpretation of complex powers unless $a$ and $x$ are both positive real numbers. It does give you a simple estimate for the sum.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 15 at 8:16
1
1
$begingroup$
@MartinHansen: $1-phi$ is also negative. How will you define $(-1)^log 2$?
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang Kais
Mar 15 at 8:56
$begingroup$
@MartinHansen: $1-phi$ is also negative. How will you define $(-1)^log 2$?
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang Kais
Mar 15 at 8:56
|
show 5 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
@MartinHansen
Sorry i cant comment as i have reputation less than 50
$$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi^logn-(-phi)^-log(n)sqrt5+frac phi^log(n)-1-(-phi)^-(log(n)-1)sqrt5$$
$$log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi^log(n)+(phi)^(log(n)-1)sqrt5+frac phi^-log(n)+(phi)^-(log(n)-1)sqrt5$$
as in asymptotic time complexity we tends to ignore constants
$$log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = phi^log(n)+(phi)^(log(n)-1)+phi^-log(n)+(phi)^-(log(n)-1)$$
How can i proceed further from here
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148590%2ffibonacci-elegance-sought-for-f-f-n-f-fn-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
@MartinHansen
Sorry i cant comment as i have reputation less than 50
$$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi^logn-(-phi)^-log(n)sqrt5+frac phi^log(n)-1-(-phi)^-(log(n)-1)sqrt5$$
$$log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi^log(n)+(phi)^(log(n)-1)sqrt5+frac phi^-log(n)+(phi)^-(log(n)-1)sqrt5$$
as in asymptotic time complexity we tends to ignore constants
$$log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = phi^log(n)+(phi)^(log(n)-1)+phi^-log(n)+(phi)^-(log(n)-1)$$
How can i proceed further from here
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@MartinHansen
Sorry i cant comment as i have reputation less than 50
$$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi^logn-(-phi)^-log(n)sqrt5+frac phi^log(n)-1-(-phi)^-(log(n)-1)sqrt5$$
$$log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi^log(n)+(phi)^(log(n)-1)sqrt5+frac phi^-log(n)+(phi)^-(log(n)-1)sqrt5$$
as in asymptotic time complexity we tends to ignore constants
$$log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = phi^log(n)+(phi)^(log(n)-1)+phi^-log(n)+(phi)^-(log(n)-1)$$
How can i proceed further from here
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@MartinHansen
Sorry i cant comment as i have reputation less than 50
$$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi^logn-(-phi)^-log(n)sqrt5+frac phi^log(n)-1-(-phi)^-(log(n)-1)sqrt5$$
$$log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi^log(n)+(phi)^(log(n)-1)sqrt5+frac phi^-log(n)+(phi)^-(log(n)-1)sqrt5$$
as in asymptotic time complexity we tends to ignore constants
$$log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = phi^log(n)+(phi)^(log(n)-1)+phi^-log(n)+(phi)^-(log(n)-1)$$
How can i proceed further from here
New contributor
$endgroup$
@MartinHansen
Sorry i cant comment as i have reputation less than 50
$$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi^logn-(-phi)^-log(n)sqrt5+frac phi^log(n)-1-(-phi)^-(log(n)-1)sqrt5$$
$$log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi^log(n)+(phi)^(log(n)-1)sqrt5+frac phi^-log(n)+(phi)^-(log(n)-1)sqrt5$$
as in asymptotic time complexity we tends to ignore constants
$$log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = phi^log(n)+(phi)^(log(n)-1)+phi^-log(n)+(phi)^-(log(n)-1)$$
How can i proceed further from here
New contributor
New contributor
answered Mar 18 at 12:06
S.OhanzeeS.Ohanzee
116
116
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3148590%2ffibonacci-elegance-sought-for-f-f-n-f-fn-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Note the same basic question was asked about $2$ hours earlier at how can i place then values = F(logn)+F(logn-1) in golden ratio Fibonacci series?. I appreciate you leaving a comment on the other question about you asking it here, but you should also mention that somewhere in this new question. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– John Omielan
Mar 14 at 22:28
2
$begingroup$
As you can't take a negative number to a non-integer power, $log(n)$ will have to be an integer, and so $F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = F_log(n)+1$.
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang Kais
Mar 15 at 0:28
1
$begingroup$
@Wolfgang Kais : Of course ! And if I use that in the Binet formula I can get to $$F_log (n) + F_log(n)-1 = frac phi times phi^log (n)-(1-phi) times (1- phi)^log(n)sqrt5$$ which is so similar to the expression I mention in my question that I think I have a single minus sign error and so have $phi^2$ instead of $(1 - phi)$. I'll try to reconcile the two methods tomorrow. Thanks !
$endgroup$
– Martin Hansen
Mar 15 at 1:21
1
$begingroup$
You can also try and use the identity $$x^log a=a^log x.$$ Unfortunately that requires careful interpretation of complex powers unless $a$ and $x$ are both positive real numbers. It does give you a simple estimate for the sum.
$endgroup$
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Mar 15 at 8:16
1
$begingroup$
@MartinHansen: $1-phi$ is also negative. How will you define $(-1)^log 2$?
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang Kais
Mar 15 at 8:56