Express each of these sentences in terms of Q(x, y), quantifiers, and logical connectives [closed]Express each of these sentences in terms of $Q(x, y)$, quantifiers, and logical connectives,Difference between these two logical expressionHow to express the following statement with Quantifiers and PredicatesNested Quantifiers (And vs Implies)Nested Quantifiers Implications or Logical And?Use quantifiers to express each of these statementsQuestions dealing with nested quantifiersHow to use quantifiers to express these statementsWriting english statement into predicate logic using quantifiers.Conversion of English statement to Logic Expression Using quantifiers

Biological Blimps: Propulsion

Does a 'pending' US visa application constitute a denial?

Should I outline or discovery write my stories?

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

"Spoil" vs "Ruin"

Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?

What should you do if you miss a job interview (deliberately)?

GraphicsGrid with a Label for each Column and Row

Creepy dinosaur pc game identification

Not using 's' for he/she/it

Is it safe to use olive oil to clean the ear wax?

Problem with TransformedDistribution

Did Swami Prabhupada reject Advaita?

How to implement a feedback to keep the DC gain at zero for this conceptual passive filter?

2.8 Why are collections grayed out? How can I open them?

Is there any references on the tensor product of presentable (1-)categories?

If infinitesimal transformations commute why dont the generators of the Lorentz group commute?

If a character has darkvision, can they see through an area of nonmagical darkness filled with lightly obscuring gas?

What prevents the use of a multi-segment ILS for non-straight approaches?

What is the evidence for the "tyranny of the majority problem" in a direct democracy context?

Removing files under particular conditions (number of files, file age)

Yosemite Fire Rings - What to Expect?

On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?

Count the occurrence of each unique word in the file



Express each of these sentences in terms of Q(x, y), quantifiers, and logical connectives [closed]


Express each of these sentences in terms of $Q(x, y)$, quantifiers, and logical connectives,Difference between these two logical expressionHow to express the following statement with Quantifiers and PredicatesNested Quantifiers (And vs Implies)Nested Quantifiers Implications or Logical And?Use quantifiers to express each of these statementsQuestions dealing with nested quantifiersHow to use quantifiers to express these statementsWriting english statement into predicate logic using quantifiers.Conversion of English statement to Logic Expression Using quantifiers













0












$begingroup$


Let Q(x, y) be the statement “student x has been a contestant
on quiz show y.” Express each of these sentences
in terms of Q(x, y), quantifiers, and logical connectives,
where the domain for x consists of all students at your
school and for y consists of all quiz shows on television.



a) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
on a television quiz show.



b) No student at your school has ever been a contestant
on a television quiz show.



c) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
on Jeopardy and on Wheel of Fortune.



d) Every television quiz show has had a student from
your school as a contestant.



e) At least two students from your school have been contestants
on Jeopardy.



(Reference: Discrete Mathematics (7th Edition) Kenneth H. Rosen, Exercise-1.5 Question No.-8)



I am not able to solve this question. What the approach to solve this question? Please Explain










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel Mar 17 at 2:18


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let Q(x, y) be the statement “student x has been a contestant
    on quiz show y.” Express each of these sentences
    in terms of Q(x, y), quantifiers, and logical connectives,
    where the domain for x consists of all students at your
    school and for y consists of all quiz shows on television.



    a) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
    on a television quiz show.



    b) No student at your school has ever been a contestant
    on a television quiz show.



    c) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
    on Jeopardy and on Wheel of Fortune.



    d) Every television quiz show has had a student from
    your school as a contestant.



    e) At least two students from your school have been contestants
    on Jeopardy.



    (Reference: Discrete Mathematics (7th Edition) Kenneth H. Rosen, Exercise-1.5 Question No.-8)



    I am not able to solve this question. What the approach to solve this question? Please Explain










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$



    closed as off-topic by Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel Mar 17 at 2:18


    This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


    • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel
    If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let Q(x, y) be the statement “student x has been a contestant
      on quiz show y.” Express each of these sentences
      in terms of Q(x, y), quantifiers, and logical connectives,
      where the domain for x consists of all students at your
      school and for y consists of all quiz shows on television.



      a) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
      on a television quiz show.



      b) No student at your school has ever been a contestant
      on a television quiz show.



      c) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
      on Jeopardy and on Wheel of Fortune.



      d) Every television quiz show has had a student from
      your school as a contestant.



      e) At least two students from your school have been contestants
      on Jeopardy.



      (Reference: Discrete Mathematics (7th Edition) Kenneth H. Rosen, Exercise-1.5 Question No.-8)



      I am not able to solve this question. What the approach to solve this question? Please Explain










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let Q(x, y) be the statement “student x has been a contestant
      on quiz show y.” Express each of these sentences
      in terms of Q(x, y), quantifiers, and logical connectives,
      where the domain for x consists of all students at your
      school and for y consists of all quiz shows on television.



      a) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
      on a television quiz show.



      b) No student at your school has ever been a contestant
      on a television quiz show.



      c) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
      on Jeopardy and on Wheel of Fortune.



      d) Every television quiz show has had a student from
      your school as a contestant.



      e) At least two students from your school have been contestants
      on Jeopardy.



      (Reference: Discrete Mathematics (7th Edition) Kenneth H. Rosen, Exercise-1.5 Question No.-8)



      I am not able to solve this question. What the approach to solve this question? Please Explain







      logic predicate-logic quantifiers logic-translation






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 15 at 16:57









      Taroccoesbrocco

      5,64271840




      5,64271840










      asked Mar 3 at 5:31









      Sumit RanjanSumit Ranjan

      368




      368




      closed as off-topic by Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel Mar 17 at 2:18


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel
      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







      closed as off-topic by Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel Mar 17 at 2:18


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel
      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          I hope that you are clear with the quantifiers and their use. I will show in this answer how to use them together with the logical connectives in order solve the problem.



          a) Given statement is: "There is a student in your school who has been a contestant in a television quiz show". First, identify the set. Clearly it is the set of students in the school. Name that set $S$. What does the statement say? It says "there is a student", which in terms of quantifiers means $exists x in S$. What property does this $x$ hold? It has contested in a television quiz show. So, for us, $y = $ television quiz show. Now, we combine all this information in a single logic statement involving quantifiers:-



          $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



          b) Given statement is: "No student at your school has ever been a contestant on a television quiz show". This can also be said as, "Given any student in your school, the student has not been on a television quiz show". So, the quantifier being used is $forall$. What property does every student hold? It is that the student has not participated in television quiz show. If $Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has participated in the show, then $neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has not participated. Hence, the given statement in form of logical connectives is



          $$forall x in S left( neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



          c) This goes same as a) with two television shows thereby making the logical statement as:



          $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( x, textWheel of Fortune right) right)$$



          d) Given statement: "Every television show has had a student from your school as a contestant." Here, two sets are involved: The set of all television shows, say $T$, and second, the set of all students of your school, say $S$. Now, first we pick "any" television show, i.e., $forall t in T$. What property does this $t$ hold? It holds that one student from your school, i.e., $exists s in S$ has participated in it, i.e., $Q left( s, t right)$ holds true. Hence, the given statement in terms of quantifiers is given as



          $$forall t in T left( exists s in S left( Q left( s, t right) right) right)$$



          e) Given statement is: "At least two students have been contestants on Jeopardy". Since the statement says, there are "at least two" students, we use the quantifier $exists x in S$ and $exists y in S$ with an additional property that $x neq y$ (so that at least two holds in general). The property that both the students hold is that for both of them $Q left( x, textJeopardy right)$ and $Q left( y, textJeopardy right)$ holds true. So, in terms of quantifiers, we write:



          $$exists x in S wedge exists y in S left( x neq y wedge Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( y, textJeopardy right) right)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



















            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            I hope that you are clear with the quantifiers and their use. I will show in this answer how to use them together with the logical connectives in order solve the problem.



            a) Given statement is: "There is a student in your school who has been a contestant in a television quiz show". First, identify the set. Clearly it is the set of students in the school. Name that set $S$. What does the statement say? It says "there is a student", which in terms of quantifiers means $exists x in S$. What property does this $x$ hold? It has contested in a television quiz show. So, for us, $y = $ television quiz show. Now, we combine all this information in a single logic statement involving quantifiers:-



            $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



            b) Given statement is: "No student at your school has ever been a contestant on a television quiz show". This can also be said as, "Given any student in your school, the student has not been on a television quiz show". So, the quantifier being used is $forall$. What property does every student hold? It is that the student has not participated in television quiz show. If $Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has participated in the show, then $neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has not participated. Hence, the given statement in form of logical connectives is



            $$forall x in S left( neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



            c) This goes same as a) with two television shows thereby making the logical statement as:



            $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( x, textWheel of Fortune right) right)$$



            d) Given statement: "Every television show has had a student from your school as a contestant." Here, two sets are involved: The set of all television shows, say $T$, and second, the set of all students of your school, say $S$. Now, first we pick "any" television show, i.e., $forall t in T$. What property does this $t$ hold? It holds that one student from your school, i.e., $exists s in S$ has participated in it, i.e., $Q left( s, t right)$ holds true. Hence, the given statement in terms of quantifiers is given as



            $$forall t in T left( exists s in S left( Q left( s, t right) right) right)$$



            e) Given statement is: "At least two students have been contestants on Jeopardy". Since the statement says, there are "at least two" students, we use the quantifier $exists x in S$ and $exists y in S$ with an additional property that $x neq y$ (so that at least two holds in general). The property that both the students hold is that for both of them $Q left( x, textJeopardy right)$ and $Q left( y, textJeopardy right)$ holds true. So, in terms of quantifiers, we write:



            $$exists x in S wedge exists y in S left( x neq y wedge Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( y, textJeopardy right) right)$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              I hope that you are clear with the quantifiers and their use. I will show in this answer how to use them together with the logical connectives in order solve the problem.



              a) Given statement is: "There is a student in your school who has been a contestant in a television quiz show". First, identify the set. Clearly it is the set of students in the school. Name that set $S$. What does the statement say? It says "there is a student", which in terms of quantifiers means $exists x in S$. What property does this $x$ hold? It has contested in a television quiz show. So, for us, $y = $ television quiz show. Now, we combine all this information in a single logic statement involving quantifiers:-



              $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



              b) Given statement is: "No student at your school has ever been a contestant on a television quiz show". This can also be said as, "Given any student in your school, the student has not been on a television quiz show". So, the quantifier being used is $forall$. What property does every student hold? It is that the student has not participated in television quiz show. If $Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has participated in the show, then $neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has not participated. Hence, the given statement in form of logical connectives is



              $$forall x in S left( neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



              c) This goes same as a) with two television shows thereby making the logical statement as:



              $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( x, textWheel of Fortune right) right)$$



              d) Given statement: "Every television show has had a student from your school as a contestant." Here, two sets are involved: The set of all television shows, say $T$, and second, the set of all students of your school, say $S$. Now, first we pick "any" television show, i.e., $forall t in T$. What property does this $t$ hold? It holds that one student from your school, i.e., $exists s in S$ has participated in it, i.e., $Q left( s, t right)$ holds true. Hence, the given statement in terms of quantifiers is given as



              $$forall t in T left( exists s in S left( Q left( s, t right) right) right)$$



              e) Given statement is: "At least two students have been contestants on Jeopardy". Since the statement says, there are "at least two" students, we use the quantifier $exists x in S$ and $exists y in S$ with an additional property that $x neq y$ (so that at least two holds in general). The property that both the students hold is that for both of them $Q left( x, textJeopardy right)$ and $Q left( y, textJeopardy right)$ holds true. So, in terms of quantifiers, we write:



              $$exists x in S wedge exists y in S left( x neq y wedge Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( y, textJeopardy right) right)$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                I hope that you are clear with the quantifiers and their use. I will show in this answer how to use them together with the logical connectives in order solve the problem.



                a) Given statement is: "There is a student in your school who has been a contestant in a television quiz show". First, identify the set. Clearly it is the set of students in the school. Name that set $S$. What does the statement say? It says "there is a student", which in terms of quantifiers means $exists x in S$. What property does this $x$ hold? It has contested in a television quiz show. So, for us, $y = $ television quiz show. Now, we combine all this information in a single logic statement involving quantifiers:-



                $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



                b) Given statement is: "No student at your school has ever been a contestant on a television quiz show". This can also be said as, "Given any student in your school, the student has not been on a television quiz show". So, the quantifier being used is $forall$. What property does every student hold? It is that the student has not participated in television quiz show. If $Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has participated in the show, then $neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has not participated. Hence, the given statement in form of logical connectives is



                $$forall x in S left( neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



                c) This goes same as a) with two television shows thereby making the logical statement as:



                $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( x, textWheel of Fortune right) right)$$



                d) Given statement: "Every television show has had a student from your school as a contestant." Here, two sets are involved: The set of all television shows, say $T$, and second, the set of all students of your school, say $S$. Now, first we pick "any" television show, i.e., $forall t in T$. What property does this $t$ hold? It holds that one student from your school, i.e., $exists s in S$ has participated in it, i.e., $Q left( s, t right)$ holds true. Hence, the given statement in terms of quantifiers is given as



                $$forall t in T left( exists s in S left( Q left( s, t right) right) right)$$



                e) Given statement is: "At least two students have been contestants on Jeopardy". Since the statement says, there are "at least two" students, we use the quantifier $exists x in S$ and $exists y in S$ with an additional property that $x neq y$ (so that at least two holds in general). The property that both the students hold is that for both of them $Q left( x, textJeopardy right)$ and $Q left( y, textJeopardy right)$ holds true. So, in terms of quantifiers, we write:



                $$exists x in S wedge exists y in S left( x neq y wedge Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( y, textJeopardy right) right)$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I hope that you are clear with the quantifiers and their use. I will show in this answer how to use them together with the logical connectives in order solve the problem.



                a) Given statement is: "There is a student in your school who has been a contestant in a television quiz show". First, identify the set. Clearly it is the set of students in the school. Name that set $S$. What does the statement say? It says "there is a student", which in terms of quantifiers means $exists x in S$. What property does this $x$ hold? It has contested in a television quiz show. So, for us, $y = $ television quiz show. Now, we combine all this information in a single logic statement involving quantifiers:-



                $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



                b) Given statement is: "No student at your school has ever been a contestant on a television quiz show". This can also be said as, "Given any student in your school, the student has not been on a television quiz show". So, the quantifier being used is $forall$. What property does every student hold? It is that the student has not participated in television quiz show. If $Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has participated in the show, then $neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has not participated. Hence, the given statement in form of logical connectives is



                $$forall x in S left( neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



                c) This goes same as a) with two television shows thereby making the logical statement as:



                $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( x, textWheel of Fortune right) right)$$



                d) Given statement: "Every television show has had a student from your school as a contestant." Here, two sets are involved: The set of all television shows, say $T$, and second, the set of all students of your school, say $S$. Now, first we pick "any" television show, i.e., $forall t in T$. What property does this $t$ hold? It holds that one student from your school, i.e., $exists s in S$ has participated in it, i.e., $Q left( s, t right)$ holds true. Hence, the given statement in terms of quantifiers is given as



                $$forall t in T left( exists s in S left( Q left( s, t right) right) right)$$



                e) Given statement is: "At least two students have been contestants on Jeopardy". Since the statement says, there are "at least two" students, we use the quantifier $exists x in S$ and $exists y in S$ with an additional property that $x neq y$ (so that at least two holds in general). The property that both the students hold is that for both of them $Q left( x, textJeopardy right)$ and $Q left( y, textJeopardy right)$ holds true. So, in terms of quantifiers, we write:



                $$exists x in S wedge exists y in S left( x neq y wedge Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( y, textJeopardy right) right)$$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 3 at 5:47









                Aniruddha DeshmukhAniruddha Deshmukh

                1,156419




                1,156419













                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer