Express each of these sentences in terms of Q(x, y), quantifiers, and logical connectives [closed]Express each of these sentences in terms of $Q(x, y)$, quantifiers, and logical connectives,Difference between these two logical expressionHow to express the following statement with Quantifiers and PredicatesNested Quantifiers (And vs Implies)Nested Quantifiers Implications or Logical And?Use quantifiers to express each of these statementsQuestions dealing with nested quantifiersHow to use quantifiers to express these statementsWriting english statement into predicate logic using quantifiers.Conversion of English statement to Logic Expression Using quantifiers

Biological Blimps: Propulsion

Does a 'pending' US visa application constitute a denial?

Should I outline or discovery write my stories?

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

"Spoil" vs "Ruin"

Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?

What should you do if you miss a job interview (deliberately)?

GraphicsGrid with a Label for each Column and Row

Creepy dinosaur pc game identification

Not using 's' for he/she/it

Is it safe to use olive oil to clean the ear wax?

Problem with TransformedDistribution

Did Swami Prabhupada reject Advaita?

How to implement a feedback to keep the DC gain at zero for this conceptual passive filter?

2.8 Why are collections grayed out? How can I open them?

Is there any references on the tensor product of presentable (1-)categories?

If infinitesimal transformations commute why dont the generators of the Lorentz group commute?

If a character has darkvision, can they see through an area of nonmagical darkness filled with lightly obscuring gas?

What prevents the use of a multi-segment ILS for non-straight approaches?

What is the evidence for the "tyranny of the majority problem" in a direct democracy context?

Removing files under particular conditions (number of files, file age)

Yosemite Fire Rings - What to Expect?

On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?

Count the occurrence of each unique word in the file



Express each of these sentences in terms of Q(x, y), quantifiers, and logical connectives [closed]


Express each of these sentences in terms of $Q(x, y)$, quantifiers, and logical connectives,Difference between these two logical expressionHow to express the following statement with Quantifiers and PredicatesNested Quantifiers (And vs Implies)Nested Quantifiers Implications or Logical And?Use quantifiers to express each of these statementsQuestions dealing with nested quantifiersHow to use quantifiers to express these statementsWriting english statement into predicate logic using quantifiers.Conversion of English statement to Logic Expression Using quantifiers













0












$begingroup$


Let Q(x, y) be the statement “student x has been a contestant
on quiz show y.” Express each of these sentences
in terms of Q(x, y), quantifiers, and logical connectives,
where the domain for x consists of all students at your
school and for y consists of all quiz shows on television.



a) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
on a television quiz show.



b) No student at your school has ever been a contestant
on a television quiz show.



c) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
on Jeopardy and on Wheel of Fortune.



d) Every television quiz show has had a student from
your school as a contestant.



e) At least two students from your school have been contestants
on Jeopardy.



(Reference: Discrete Mathematics (7th Edition) Kenneth H. Rosen, Exercise-1.5 Question No.-8)



I am not able to solve this question. What the approach to solve this question? Please Explain










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel Mar 17 at 2:18


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let Q(x, y) be the statement “student x has been a contestant
    on quiz show y.” Express each of these sentences
    in terms of Q(x, y), quantifiers, and logical connectives,
    where the domain for x consists of all students at your
    school and for y consists of all quiz shows on television.



    a) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
    on a television quiz show.



    b) No student at your school has ever been a contestant
    on a television quiz show.



    c) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
    on Jeopardy and on Wheel of Fortune.



    d) Every television quiz show has had a student from
    your school as a contestant.



    e) At least two students from your school have been contestants
    on Jeopardy.



    (Reference: Discrete Mathematics (7th Edition) Kenneth H. Rosen, Exercise-1.5 Question No.-8)



    I am not able to solve this question. What the approach to solve this question? Please Explain










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$



    closed as off-topic by Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel Mar 17 at 2:18


    This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


    • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel
    If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let Q(x, y) be the statement “student x has been a contestant
      on quiz show y.” Express each of these sentences
      in terms of Q(x, y), quantifiers, and logical connectives,
      where the domain for x consists of all students at your
      school and for y consists of all quiz shows on television.



      a) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
      on a television quiz show.



      b) No student at your school has ever been a contestant
      on a television quiz show.



      c) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
      on Jeopardy and on Wheel of Fortune.



      d) Every television quiz show has had a student from
      your school as a contestant.



      e) At least two students from your school have been contestants
      on Jeopardy.



      (Reference: Discrete Mathematics (7th Edition) Kenneth H. Rosen, Exercise-1.5 Question No.-8)



      I am not able to solve this question. What the approach to solve this question? Please Explain










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let Q(x, y) be the statement “student x has been a contestant
      on quiz show y.” Express each of these sentences
      in terms of Q(x, y), quantifiers, and logical connectives,
      where the domain for x consists of all students at your
      school and for y consists of all quiz shows on television.



      a) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
      on a television quiz show.



      b) No student at your school has ever been a contestant
      on a television quiz show.



      c) There is a student at your school who has been a contestant
      on Jeopardy and on Wheel of Fortune.



      d) Every television quiz show has had a student from
      your school as a contestant.



      e) At least two students from your school have been contestants
      on Jeopardy.



      (Reference: Discrete Mathematics (7th Edition) Kenneth H. Rosen, Exercise-1.5 Question No.-8)



      I am not able to solve this question. What the approach to solve this question? Please Explain







      logic predicate-logic quantifiers logic-translation






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 15 at 16:57









      Taroccoesbrocco

      5,64271840




      5,64271840










      asked Mar 3 at 5:31









      Sumit RanjanSumit Ranjan

      368




      368




      closed as off-topic by Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel Mar 17 at 2:18


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel
      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







      closed as off-topic by Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel Mar 17 at 2:18


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Vinyl_cape_jawa, Shaun, José Carlos Santos, Parcly Taxel
      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          I hope that you are clear with the quantifiers and their use. I will show in this answer how to use them together with the logical connectives in order solve the problem.



          a) Given statement is: "There is a student in your school who has been a contestant in a television quiz show". First, identify the set. Clearly it is the set of students in the school. Name that set $S$. What does the statement say? It says "there is a student", which in terms of quantifiers means $exists x in S$. What property does this $x$ hold? It has contested in a television quiz show. So, for us, $y = $ television quiz show. Now, we combine all this information in a single logic statement involving quantifiers:-



          $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



          b) Given statement is: "No student at your school has ever been a contestant on a television quiz show". This can also be said as, "Given any student in your school, the student has not been on a television quiz show". So, the quantifier being used is $forall$. What property does every student hold? It is that the student has not participated in television quiz show. If $Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has participated in the show, then $neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has not participated. Hence, the given statement in form of logical connectives is



          $$forall x in S left( neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



          c) This goes same as a) with two television shows thereby making the logical statement as:



          $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( x, textWheel of Fortune right) right)$$



          d) Given statement: "Every television show has had a student from your school as a contestant." Here, two sets are involved: The set of all television shows, say $T$, and second, the set of all students of your school, say $S$. Now, first we pick "any" television show, i.e., $forall t in T$. What property does this $t$ hold? It holds that one student from your school, i.e., $exists s in S$ has participated in it, i.e., $Q left( s, t right)$ holds true. Hence, the given statement in terms of quantifiers is given as



          $$forall t in T left( exists s in S left( Q left( s, t right) right) right)$$



          e) Given statement is: "At least two students have been contestants on Jeopardy". Since the statement says, there are "at least two" students, we use the quantifier $exists x in S$ and $exists y in S$ with an additional property that $x neq y$ (so that at least two holds in general). The property that both the students hold is that for both of them $Q left( x, textJeopardy right)$ and $Q left( y, textJeopardy right)$ holds true. So, in terms of quantifiers, we write:



          $$exists x in S wedge exists y in S left( x neq y wedge Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( y, textJeopardy right) right)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



















            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            I hope that you are clear with the quantifiers and their use. I will show in this answer how to use them together with the logical connectives in order solve the problem.



            a) Given statement is: "There is a student in your school who has been a contestant in a television quiz show". First, identify the set. Clearly it is the set of students in the school. Name that set $S$. What does the statement say? It says "there is a student", which in terms of quantifiers means $exists x in S$. What property does this $x$ hold? It has contested in a television quiz show. So, for us, $y = $ television quiz show. Now, we combine all this information in a single logic statement involving quantifiers:-



            $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



            b) Given statement is: "No student at your school has ever been a contestant on a television quiz show". This can also be said as, "Given any student in your school, the student has not been on a television quiz show". So, the quantifier being used is $forall$. What property does every student hold? It is that the student has not participated in television quiz show. If $Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has participated in the show, then $neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has not participated. Hence, the given statement in form of logical connectives is



            $$forall x in S left( neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



            c) This goes same as a) with two television shows thereby making the logical statement as:



            $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( x, textWheel of Fortune right) right)$$



            d) Given statement: "Every television show has had a student from your school as a contestant." Here, two sets are involved: The set of all television shows, say $T$, and second, the set of all students of your school, say $S$. Now, first we pick "any" television show, i.e., $forall t in T$. What property does this $t$ hold? It holds that one student from your school, i.e., $exists s in S$ has participated in it, i.e., $Q left( s, t right)$ holds true. Hence, the given statement in terms of quantifiers is given as



            $$forall t in T left( exists s in S left( Q left( s, t right) right) right)$$



            e) Given statement is: "At least two students have been contestants on Jeopardy". Since the statement says, there are "at least two" students, we use the quantifier $exists x in S$ and $exists y in S$ with an additional property that $x neq y$ (so that at least two holds in general). The property that both the students hold is that for both of them $Q left( x, textJeopardy right)$ and $Q left( y, textJeopardy right)$ holds true. So, in terms of quantifiers, we write:



            $$exists x in S wedge exists y in S left( x neq y wedge Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( y, textJeopardy right) right)$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              I hope that you are clear with the quantifiers and their use. I will show in this answer how to use them together with the logical connectives in order solve the problem.



              a) Given statement is: "There is a student in your school who has been a contestant in a television quiz show". First, identify the set. Clearly it is the set of students in the school. Name that set $S$. What does the statement say? It says "there is a student", which in terms of quantifiers means $exists x in S$. What property does this $x$ hold? It has contested in a television quiz show. So, for us, $y = $ television quiz show. Now, we combine all this information in a single logic statement involving quantifiers:-



              $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



              b) Given statement is: "No student at your school has ever been a contestant on a television quiz show". This can also be said as, "Given any student in your school, the student has not been on a television quiz show". So, the quantifier being used is $forall$. What property does every student hold? It is that the student has not participated in television quiz show. If $Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has participated in the show, then $neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has not participated. Hence, the given statement in form of logical connectives is



              $$forall x in S left( neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



              c) This goes same as a) with two television shows thereby making the logical statement as:



              $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( x, textWheel of Fortune right) right)$$



              d) Given statement: "Every television show has had a student from your school as a contestant." Here, two sets are involved: The set of all television shows, say $T$, and second, the set of all students of your school, say $S$. Now, first we pick "any" television show, i.e., $forall t in T$. What property does this $t$ hold? It holds that one student from your school, i.e., $exists s in S$ has participated in it, i.e., $Q left( s, t right)$ holds true. Hence, the given statement in terms of quantifiers is given as



              $$forall t in T left( exists s in S left( Q left( s, t right) right) right)$$



              e) Given statement is: "At least two students have been contestants on Jeopardy". Since the statement says, there are "at least two" students, we use the quantifier $exists x in S$ and $exists y in S$ with an additional property that $x neq y$ (so that at least two holds in general). The property that both the students hold is that for both of them $Q left( x, textJeopardy right)$ and $Q left( y, textJeopardy right)$ holds true. So, in terms of quantifiers, we write:



              $$exists x in S wedge exists y in S left( x neq y wedge Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( y, textJeopardy right) right)$$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                I hope that you are clear with the quantifiers and their use. I will show in this answer how to use them together with the logical connectives in order solve the problem.



                a) Given statement is: "There is a student in your school who has been a contestant in a television quiz show". First, identify the set. Clearly it is the set of students in the school. Name that set $S$. What does the statement say? It says "there is a student", which in terms of quantifiers means $exists x in S$. What property does this $x$ hold? It has contested in a television quiz show. So, for us, $y = $ television quiz show. Now, we combine all this information in a single logic statement involving quantifiers:-



                $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



                b) Given statement is: "No student at your school has ever been a contestant on a television quiz show". This can also be said as, "Given any student in your school, the student has not been on a television quiz show". So, the quantifier being used is $forall$. What property does every student hold? It is that the student has not participated in television quiz show. If $Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has participated in the show, then $neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has not participated. Hence, the given statement in form of logical connectives is



                $$forall x in S left( neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



                c) This goes same as a) with two television shows thereby making the logical statement as:



                $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( x, textWheel of Fortune right) right)$$



                d) Given statement: "Every television show has had a student from your school as a contestant." Here, two sets are involved: The set of all television shows, say $T$, and second, the set of all students of your school, say $S$. Now, first we pick "any" television show, i.e., $forall t in T$. What property does this $t$ hold? It holds that one student from your school, i.e., $exists s in S$ has participated in it, i.e., $Q left( s, t right)$ holds true. Hence, the given statement in terms of quantifiers is given as



                $$forall t in T left( exists s in S left( Q left( s, t right) right) right)$$



                e) Given statement is: "At least two students have been contestants on Jeopardy". Since the statement says, there are "at least two" students, we use the quantifier $exists x in S$ and $exists y in S$ with an additional property that $x neq y$ (so that at least two holds in general). The property that both the students hold is that for both of them $Q left( x, textJeopardy right)$ and $Q left( y, textJeopardy right)$ holds true. So, in terms of quantifiers, we write:



                $$exists x in S wedge exists y in S left( x neq y wedge Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( y, textJeopardy right) right)$$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I hope that you are clear with the quantifiers and their use. I will show in this answer how to use them together with the logical connectives in order solve the problem.



                a) Given statement is: "There is a student in your school who has been a contestant in a television quiz show". First, identify the set. Clearly it is the set of students in the school. Name that set $S$. What does the statement say? It says "there is a student", which in terms of quantifiers means $exists x in S$. What property does this $x$ hold? It has contested in a television quiz show. So, for us, $y = $ television quiz show. Now, we combine all this information in a single logic statement involving quantifiers:-



                $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



                b) Given statement is: "No student at your school has ever been a contestant on a television quiz show". This can also be said as, "Given any student in your school, the student has not been on a television quiz show". So, the quantifier being used is $forall$. What property does every student hold? It is that the student has not participated in television quiz show. If $Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has participated in the show, then $neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right)$ means that $x$ has not participated. Hence, the given statement in form of logical connectives is



                $$forall x in S left( neg Q left( x, text television quiz show right) right)$$



                c) This goes same as a) with two television shows thereby making the logical statement as:



                $$exists x in S left( Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( x, textWheel of Fortune right) right)$$



                d) Given statement: "Every television show has had a student from your school as a contestant." Here, two sets are involved: The set of all television shows, say $T$, and second, the set of all students of your school, say $S$. Now, first we pick "any" television show, i.e., $forall t in T$. What property does this $t$ hold? It holds that one student from your school, i.e., $exists s in S$ has participated in it, i.e., $Q left( s, t right)$ holds true. Hence, the given statement in terms of quantifiers is given as



                $$forall t in T left( exists s in S left( Q left( s, t right) right) right)$$



                e) Given statement is: "At least two students have been contestants on Jeopardy". Since the statement says, there are "at least two" students, we use the quantifier $exists x in S$ and $exists y in S$ with an additional property that $x neq y$ (so that at least two holds in general). The property that both the students hold is that for both of them $Q left( x, textJeopardy right)$ and $Q left( y, textJeopardy right)$ holds true. So, in terms of quantifiers, we write:



                $$exists x in S wedge exists y in S left( x neq y wedge Q left( x, textJeopardy right) wedge Q left( y, textJeopardy right) right)$$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 3 at 5:47









                Aniruddha DeshmukhAniruddha Deshmukh

                1,156419




                1,156419













                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

                    Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

                    Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers