Find the Image $2x-3y=0$ given matrix transformationFind matrix of linear transformation relative to new basesFind the image under $T$ Linear Transformation - Linear Algebrafind the standard matrix for the composition of reflection and rotationFind the matrix of a linear transformationHow do I determine the transformation matrix T of the coordinate transformation from the base E to the base B?Effect of simple linear transformationMatrix associated to a linear transformation given eigenvaluesFinding Matrix representation of linear transformation from rectangular matrix/imageFinding the standard matrix of the transformation, is it unique?Why do you use the inverse matrix to find the image of a curve in the plane?

Should I outline or discovery write my stories?

WiFi Thermostat, No C Terminal on Furnace

Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?

Is it possible to put a rectangle as background in the author section?

Aragorn's "guise" in the Orthanc Stone

Why Shazam when there is already Superman?

Is it improper etiquette to ask your opponent what his/her rating is before the game?

When were female captains banned from Starfleet?

GraphicsGrid with a Label for each Column and Row

What should you do if you miss a job interview (deliberately)?

Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?

What if a revenant (monster) gains fire resistance?

Why should universal income be universal?

Closed-form expression for certain product

why `nmap 192.168.1.97` returns less services than `nmap 127.0.0.1`?

How much character growth crosses the line into breaking the character

Is the U.S. Code copyrighted by the Government?

Non-trope happy ending?

Are the IPv6 address space and IPv4 address space completely disjoint?

Should I stop contributing to retirement accounts?

Does a 'pending' US visa application constitute a denial?

Delivering sarcasm

Is there a name for this algorithm to calculate the concentration of a mixture of two solutions containing the same solute?

Offered money to buy a house, seller is asking for more to cover gap between their listing and mortgage owed



Find the Image $2x-3y=0$ given matrix transformation


Find matrix of linear transformation relative to new basesFind the image under $T$ Linear Transformation - Linear Algebrafind the standard matrix for the composition of reflection and rotationFind the matrix of a linear transformationHow do I determine the transformation matrix T of the coordinate transformation from the base E to the base B?Effect of simple linear transformationMatrix associated to a linear transformation given eigenvaluesFinding Matrix representation of linear transformation from rectangular matrix/imageFinding the standard matrix of the transformation, is it unique?Why do you use the inverse matrix to find the image of a curve in the plane?













2












$begingroup$


Be $M$ the linear transformation represented by matrix $T$:



$$T =
left[ beginmatrix
5 & 2 \
4 & 1 \
endmatrixright ]
$$



Mark the correct answer which show the image by $M$ of the line $2x-3y = 0$



(A) $19x - 8y = 0$



(B) $19x - 14y = 0$ (answer)



(C) $19x -15y = 0$



(D) $15x-14y = 0$



(E) $4x - 5y = 0$



Any hints?



My first attempt was related the tranformation the each coordanaties from line r: 2x-3y = 0 with matrix T.



r as a vector: $vecr = left[beginmatrix 2\-3endmatrixright]$



$vecz = T . vecr = left[beginmatrix 4\-5endmatrixright]$ (wrong)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Be $M$ the linear transformation represented by matrix $T$:



    $$T =
    left[ beginmatrix
    5 & 2 \
    4 & 1 \
    endmatrixright ]
    $$



    Mark the correct answer which show the image by $M$ of the line $2x-3y = 0$



    (A) $19x - 8y = 0$



    (B) $19x - 14y = 0$ (answer)



    (C) $19x -15y = 0$



    (D) $15x-14y = 0$



    (E) $4x - 5y = 0$



    Any hints?



    My first attempt was related the tranformation the each coordanaties from line r: 2x-3y = 0 with matrix T.



    r as a vector: $vecr = left[beginmatrix 2\-3endmatrixright]$



    $vecz = T . vecr = left[beginmatrix 4\-5endmatrixright]$ (wrong)










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Be $M$ the linear transformation represented by matrix $T$:



      $$T =
      left[ beginmatrix
      5 & 2 \
      4 & 1 \
      endmatrixright ]
      $$



      Mark the correct answer which show the image by $M$ of the line $2x-3y = 0$



      (A) $19x - 8y = 0$



      (B) $19x - 14y = 0$ (answer)



      (C) $19x -15y = 0$



      (D) $15x-14y = 0$



      (E) $4x - 5y = 0$



      Any hints?



      My first attempt was related the tranformation the each coordanaties from line r: 2x-3y = 0 with matrix T.



      r as a vector: $vecr = left[beginmatrix 2\-3endmatrixright]$



      $vecz = T . vecr = left[beginmatrix 4\-5endmatrixright]$ (wrong)










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Be $M$ the linear transformation represented by matrix $T$:



      $$T =
      left[ beginmatrix
      5 & 2 \
      4 & 1 \
      endmatrixright ]
      $$



      Mark the correct answer which show the image by $M$ of the line $2x-3y = 0$



      (A) $19x - 8y = 0$



      (B) $19x - 14y = 0$ (answer)



      (C) $19x -15y = 0$



      (D) $15x-14y = 0$



      (E) $4x - 5y = 0$



      Any hints?



      My first attempt was related the tranformation the each coordanaties from line r: 2x-3y = 0 with matrix T.



      r as a vector: $vecr = left[beginmatrix 2\-3endmatrixright]$



      $vecz = T . vecr = left[beginmatrix 4\-5endmatrixright]$ (wrong)







      linear-transformations






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 15 at 17:40









      miguel747miguel747

      13711




      13711




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The line $2x-3y=0$ defines a subspace. The vector $r$ that you used is orthogonal to this line.



          The correct point of view is to look at the line as set of all $(x,y)inmathbb R^2$ such that $(x,y)=(x, frac23x)$ since $y=frac23x$. So it suffices to check where $T$ sends, say $(3,2)$ (which is on the line). Thus, computing
          $beginpmatrix 5& 2\ 4& 1endpmatrix beginbmatrix 3\ 2endbmatrix$
          should give the answer.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            misunderstand with some concepts but got that point. Thank you anyway
            $endgroup$
            – miguel747
            Mar 15 at 17:57










          • $begingroup$
            You should at least accept this as an answer then.
            $endgroup$
            – chhro
            Mar 15 at 18:08


















          3












          $begingroup$

          The simplest way to obtain the image of the given line



          $$2x-3y = 0$$



          is to obtain images of its $2$ points - why don't select the natural points $A=[0,0], B=[3,2]$?



          Computing their images we obtain



          $$left( beginmatrix
          5 & 2 \
          4 & 1 \
          endmatrixright )cdot
          left( beginmatrix
          0 \
          0 \
          endmatrixright ) = colorred
          left( beginmatrix
          0\
          0 \
          endmatrixright ),quadleft( beginmatrix
          5 & 2 \
          4 & 1 \
          endmatrixright )cdot
          left( beginmatrix
          3 \
          2 \
          endmatrixright ) = colorred
          left( beginmatrix
          19\
          14 \
          endmatrixright ),$$



          Now we write the equation of the line passing through resulting points $colorred(0, 0)$ and $colorred(19, 14)$, obtaining the correct result



          $$colorred14x-19y=0,$$



          which is similar to your incorrect result (B).



          enter image description here






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            1












            $begingroup$

            It might help to think of the problem this way: If you’ve been given some equations that describe the relationship between the pairs of variables $(x,y)$ and $(x',y')$, how might you express the equation $2x-3y=0$ in terms of $x'$ and $y'$? One way is to solve those first equations for $x$ and $y$, then substitute into $2x-3y$ and simplify. In this case, you’re given that $$beginbmatrixx'\y'endbmatrix = T beginbmatrixx\yendbmatrix,tag1$$ so solving for $x$ and $y$ is a simple matter of computing $T^-1$.



            You could also work directly with vectors and matrices. The equation of the line can be written as $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrix beginbmatrixx\yendbmatrix = 0tag2$$ (verify this). Substituting from (1) for $[x,y]^T$, this becomes $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrixT^-1beginbmatrixx'\y'endbmatrix = 0tag3,$$ so the coefficients of the transformed equation are the elements of the row vector $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrix beginbmatrix5&2\4&1endbmatrix^-1.$$ I trust that you’re able to compute the value of this expression at this stage of your studies.



            Incidentally, the vector $[2,-3]^T$ is orthogonal (normal) to the line. Equation (3) shows that such normal vectors transform differently than do vectors that represent points: If the point transformation is given by $mathbf v' = Mmathbf v$, then a normal vector $mathbf n$ transforms as $mathbf n' = M^-Tmathbf n$. (The $-T$ superscript means “inverse transpose.”)






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              But $T$ might not be invertible everytime.
              $endgroup$
              – chhro
              Mar 15 at 22:05










            • $begingroup$
              @chhro That’s no different from not being able to solve for $x$ and $y$ in the first paragraph. In that case, you have to use another method. Happily, $T^-1$ exists in the specific instance. It wasn’t my intent to provide a comprehensive answer replete with obfuscating details. One could quibble that the given line might not pass through the origin, in which case the method in your answer doesn’t quite apply.
              $endgroup$
              – amd
              Mar 15 at 23:15











            • $begingroup$
              Very interesting approach @amd . Ty for take your time to add more details and rich information. :)
              $endgroup$
              – miguel747
              Mar 16 at 1:55










            • $begingroup$
              I'm sure my argument works even if the given line is not a subspace since it is independent of the given linear transformation $T$. It's essentially the idea in MarianD's answer.
              $endgroup$
              – chhro
              Mar 19 at 20:43










            • $begingroup$
              @chhro You’re tacitly taking advantage of the fact that $T(0)=0$. When the line isn’t a subspace, it does not suffice to check where $T$ sends a single point on the line.
              $endgroup$
              – amd
              Mar 19 at 20:47



















            0












            $begingroup$

            STEP 1. Realize that $《x, y》: 2x + 3y = 0$ is a subspace.



            STEP 2. find the basis for the subspace. It is $(1, 2/3)$.



            STEP 3. Do matrix multiplication.



            $$left[ beginmatrix
            5 & 2 \
            4 & 1 \
            endmatrixright ]
            left[ beginmatrix
            1 \
            2/3 \
            endmatrixright ] =
            left[ beginmatrix
            19/3\
            14/3 \
            endmatrixright ]$$



            STEP 4. Translate back into equation form.



            $$P_1 = alpha left[ beginmatrix
            19/3 \
            4/3 \
            endmatrixright ]$$
            and $$P_2 = beta left[ beginmatrix
            19/3 \
            4/3 \
            endmatrixright ]$$
            . Plug these two points (interpreting the top entries as x coordinate and bottom entries as y-coordinate). Use the point-slope equation $$y = fracy_2-y_1x_2 - x_1x$$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              y2 is the y-coordinate of P2. x2 is the x-coordinate of P2. y1 is the y-coordinate of P1. x1 is the x-coordinate of P1.
              $endgroup$
              – Tomislav Ostojich
              Mar 16 at 2:01










            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3149589%2ffind-the-image-2x-3y-0-given-matrix-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes








            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            The line $2x-3y=0$ defines a subspace. The vector $r$ that you used is orthogonal to this line.



            The correct point of view is to look at the line as set of all $(x,y)inmathbb R^2$ such that $(x,y)=(x, frac23x)$ since $y=frac23x$. So it suffices to check where $T$ sends, say $(3,2)$ (which is on the line). Thus, computing
            $beginpmatrix 5& 2\ 4& 1endpmatrix beginbmatrix 3\ 2endbmatrix$
            should give the answer.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              misunderstand with some concepts but got that point. Thank you anyway
              $endgroup$
              – miguel747
              Mar 15 at 17:57










            • $begingroup$
              You should at least accept this as an answer then.
              $endgroup$
              – chhro
              Mar 15 at 18:08















            1












            $begingroup$

            The line $2x-3y=0$ defines a subspace. The vector $r$ that you used is orthogonal to this line.



            The correct point of view is to look at the line as set of all $(x,y)inmathbb R^2$ such that $(x,y)=(x, frac23x)$ since $y=frac23x$. So it suffices to check where $T$ sends, say $(3,2)$ (which is on the line). Thus, computing
            $beginpmatrix 5& 2\ 4& 1endpmatrix beginbmatrix 3\ 2endbmatrix$
            should give the answer.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              misunderstand with some concepts but got that point. Thank you anyway
              $endgroup$
              – miguel747
              Mar 15 at 17:57










            • $begingroup$
              You should at least accept this as an answer then.
              $endgroup$
              – chhro
              Mar 15 at 18:08













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            The line $2x-3y=0$ defines a subspace. The vector $r$ that you used is orthogonal to this line.



            The correct point of view is to look at the line as set of all $(x,y)inmathbb R^2$ such that $(x,y)=(x, frac23x)$ since $y=frac23x$. So it suffices to check where $T$ sends, say $(3,2)$ (which is on the line). Thus, computing
            $beginpmatrix 5& 2\ 4& 1endpmatrix beginbmatrix 3\ 2endbmatrix$
            should give the answer.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The line $2x-3y=0$ defines a subspace. The vector $r$ that you used is orthogonal to this line.



            The correct point of view is to look at the line as set of all $(x,y)inmathbb R^2$ such that $(x,y)=(x, frac23x)$ since $y=frac23x$. So it suffices to check where $T$ sends, say $(3,2)$ (which is on the line). Thus, computing
            $beginpmatrix 5& 2\ 4& 1endpmatrix beginbmatrix 3\ 2endbmatrix$
            should give the answer.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Mar 15 at 17:48









            chhrochhro

            1,434311




            1,434311











            • $begingroup$
              misunderstand with some concepts but got that point. Thank you anyway
              $endgroup$
              – miguel747
              Mar 15 at 17:57










            • $begingroup$
              You should at least accept this as an answer then.
              $endgroup$
              – chhro
              Mar 15 at 18:08
















            • $begingroup$
              misunderstand with some concepts but got that point. Thank you anyway
              $endgroup$
              – miguel747
              Mar 15 at 17:57










            • $begingroup$
              You should at least accept this as an answer then.
              $endgroup$
              – chhro
              Mar 15 at 18:08















            $begingroup$
            misunderstand with some concepts but got that point. Thank you anyway
            $endgroup$
            – miguel747
            Mar 15 at 17:57




            $begingroup$
            misunderstand with some concepts but got that point. Thank you anyway
            $endgroup$
            – miguel747
            Mar 15 at 17:57












            $begingroup$
            You should at least accept this as an answer then.
            $endgroup$
            – chhro
            Mar 15 at 18:08




            $begingroup$
            You should at least accept this as an answer then.
            $endgroup$
            – chhro
            Mar 15 at 18:08











            3












            $begingroup$

            The simplest way to obtain the image of the given line



            $$2x-3y = 0$$



            is to obtain images of its $2$ points - why don't select the natural points $A=[0,0], B=[3,2]$?



            Computing their images we obtain



            $$left( beginmatrix
            5 & 2 \
            4 & 1 \
            endmatrixright )cdot
            left( beginmatrix
            0 \
            0 \
            endmatrixright ) = colorred
            left( beginmatrix
            0\
            0 \
            endmatrixright ),quadleft( beginmatrix
            5 & 2 \
            4 & 1 \
            endmatrixright )cdot
            left( beginmatrix
            3 \
            2 \
            endmatrixright ) = colorred
            left( beginmatrix
            19\
            14 \
            endmatrixright ),$$



            Now we write the equation of the line passing through resulting points $colorred(0, 0)$ and $colorred(19, 14)$, obtaining the correct result



            $$colorred14x-19y=0,$$



            which is similar to your incorrect result (B).



            enter image description here






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              3












              $begingroup$

              The simplest way to obtain the image of the given line



              $$2x-3y = 0$$



              is to obtain images of its $2$ points - why don't select the natural points $A=[0,0], B=[3,2]$?



              Computing their images we obtain



              $$left( beginmatrix
              5 & 2 \
              4 & 1 \
              endmatrixright )cdot
              left( beginmatrix
              0 \
              0 \
              endmatrixright ) = colorred
              left( beginmatrix
              0\
              0 \
              endmatrixright ),quadleft( beginmatrix
              5 & 2 \
              4 & 1 \
              endmatrixright )cdot
              left( beginmatrix
              3 \
              2 \
              endmatrixright ) = colorred
              left( beginmatrix
              19\
              14 \
              endmatrixright ),$$



              Now we write the equation of the line passing through resulting points $colorred(0, 0)$ and $colorred(19, 14)$, obtaining the correct result



              $$colorred14x-19y=0,$$



              which is similar to your incorrect result (B).



              enter image description here






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                The simplest way to obtain the image of the given line



                $$2x-3y = 0$$



                is to obtain images of its $2$ points - why don't select the natural points $A=[0,0], B=[3,2]$?



                Computing their images we obtain



                $$left( beginmatrix
                5 & 2 \
                4 & 1 \
                endmatrixright )cdot
                left( beginmatrix
                0 \
                0 \
                endmatrixright ) = colorred
                left( beginmatrix
                0\
                0 \
                endmatrixright ),quadleft( beginmatrix
                5 & 2 \
                4 & 1 \
                endmatrixright )cdot
                left( beginmatrix
                3 \
                2 \
                endmatrixright ) = colorred
                left( beginmatrix
                19\
                14 \
                endmatrixright ),$$



                Now we write the equation of the line passing through resulting points $colorred(0, 0)$ and $colorred(19, 14)$, obtaining the correct result



                $$colorred14x-19y=0,$$



                which is similar to your incorrect result (B).



                enter image description here






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                The simplest way to obtain the image of the given line



                $$2x-3y = 0$$



                is to obtain images of its $2$ points - why don't select the natural points $A=[0,0], B=[3,2]$?



                Computing their images we obtain



                $$left( beginmatrix
                5 & 2 \
                4 & 1 \
                endmatrixright )cdot
                left( beginmatrix
                0 \
                0 \
                endmatrixright ) = colorred
                left( beginmatrix
                0\
                0 \
                endmatrixright ),quadleft( beginmatrix
                5 & 2 \
                4 & 1 \
                endmatrixright )cdot
                left( beginmatrix
                3 \
                2 \
                endmatrixright ) = colorred
                left( beginmatrix
                19\
                14 \
                endmatrixright ),$$



                Now we write the equation of the line passing through resulting points $colorred(0, 0)$ and $colorred(19, 14)$, obtaining the correct result



                $$colorred14x-19y=0,$$



                which is similar to your incorrect result (B).



                enter image description here







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Mar 16 at 2:44

























                answered Mar 16 at 2:04









                MarianDMarianD

                1,5311616




                1,5311616





















                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    It might help to think of the problem this way: If you’ve been given some equations that describe the relationship between the pairs of variables $(x,y)$ and $(x',y')$, how might you express the equation $2x-3y=0$ in terms of $x'$ and $y'$? One way is to solve those first equations for $x$ and $y$, then substitute into $2x-3y$ and simplify. In this case, you’re given that $$beginbmatrixx'\y'endbmatrix = T beginbmatrixx\yendbmatrix,tag1$$ so solving for $x$ and $y$ is a simple matter of computing $T^-1$.



                    You could also work directly with vectors and matrices. The equation of the line can be written as $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrix beginbmatrixx\yendbmatrix = 0tag2$$ (verify this). Substituting from (1) for $[x,y]^T$, this becomes $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrixT^-1beginbmatrixx'\y'endbmatrix = 0tag3,$$ so the coefficients of the transformed equation are the elements of the row vector $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrix beginbmatrix5&2\4&1endbmatrix^-1.$$ I trust that you’re able to compute the value of this expression at this stage of your studies.



                    Incidentally, the vector $[2,-3]^T$ is orthogonal (normal) to the line. Equation (3) shows that such normal vectors transform differently than do vectors that represent points: If the point transformation is given by $mathbf v' = Mmathbf v$, then a normal vector $mathbf n$ transforms as $mathbf n' = M^-Tmathbf n$. (The $-T$ superscript means “inverse transpose.”)






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      But $T$ might not be invertible everytime.
                      $endgroup$
                      – chhro
                      Mar 15 at 22:05










                    • $begingroup$
                      @chhro That’s no different from not being able to solve for $x$ and $y$ in the first paragraph. In that case, you have to use another method. Happily, $T^-1$ exists in the specific instance. It wasn’t my intent to provide a comprehensive answer replete with obfuscating details. One could quibble that the given line might not pass through the origin, in which case the method in your answer doesn’t quite apply.
                      $endgroup$
                      – amd
                      Mar 15 at 23:15











                    • $begingroup$
                      Very interesting approach @amd . Ty for take your time to add more details and rich information. :)
                      $endgroup$
                      – miguel747
                      Mar 16 at 1:55










                    • $begingroup$
                      I'm sure my argument works even if the given line is not a subspace since it is independent of the given linear transformation $T$. It's essentially the idea in MarianD's answer.
                      $endgroup$
                      – chhro
                      Mar 19 at 20:43










                    • $begingroup$
                      @chhro You’re tacitly taking advantage of the fact that $T(0)=0$. When the line isn’t a subspace, it does not suffice to check where $T$ sends a single point on the line.
                      $endgroup$
                      – amd
                      Mar 19 at 20:47
















                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    It might help to think of the problem this way: If you’ve been given some equations that describe the relationship between the pairs of variables $(x,y)$ and $(x',y')$, how might you express the equation $2x-3y=0$ in terms of $x'$ and $y'$? One way is to solve those first equations for $x$ and $y$, then substitute into $2x-3y$ and simplify. In this case, you’re given that $$beginbmatrixx'\y'endbmatrix = T beginbmatrixx\yendbmatrix,tag1$$ so solving for $x$ and $y$ is a simple matter of computing $T^-1$.



                    You could also work directly with vectors and matrices. The equation of the line can be written as $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrix beginbmatrixx\yendbmatrix = 0tag2$$ (verify this). Substituting from (1) for $[x,y]^T$, this becomes $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrixT^-1beginbmatrixx'\y'endbmatrix = 0tag3,$$ so the coefficients of the transformed equation are the elements of the row vector $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrix beginbmatrix5&2\4&1endbmatrix^-1.$$ I trust that you’re able to compute the value of this expression at this stage of your studies.



                    Incidentally, the vector $[2,-3]^T$ is orthogonal (normal) to the line. Equation (3) shows that such normal vectors transform differently than do vectors that represent points: If the point transformation is given by $mathbf v' = Mmathbf v$, then a normal vector $mathbf n$ transforms as $mathbf n' = M^-Tmathbf n$. (The $-T$ superscript means “inverse transpose.”)






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$












                    • $begingroup$
                      But $T$ might not be invertible everytime.
                      $endgroup$
                      – chhro
                      Mar 15 at 22:05










                    • $begingroup$
                      @chhro That’s no different from not being able to solve for $x$ and $y$ in the first paragraph. In that case, you have to use another method. Happily, $T^-1$ exists in the specific instance. It wasn’t my intent to provide a comprehensive answer replete with obfuscating details. One could quibble that the given line might not pass through the origin, in which case the method in your answer doesn’t quite apply.
                      $endgroup$
                      – amd
                      Mar 15 at 23:15











                    • $begingroup$
                      Very interesting approach @amd . Ty for take your time to add more details and rich information. :)
                      $endgroup$
                      – miguel747
                      Mar 16 at 1:55










                    • $begingroup$
                      I'm sure my argument works even if the given line is not a subspace since it is independent of the given linear transformation $T$. It's essentially the idea in MarianD's answer.
                      $endgroup$
                      – chhro
                      Mar 19 at 20:43










                    • $begingroup$
                      @chhro You’re tacitly taking advantage of the fact that $T(0)=0$. When the line isn’t a subspace, it does not suffice to check where $T$ sends a single point on the line.
                      $endgroup$
                      – amd
                      Mar 19 at 20:47














                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    It might help to think of the problem this way: If you’ve been given some equations that describe the relationship between the pairs of variables $(x,y)$ and $(x',y')$, how might you express the equation $2x-3y=0$ in terms of $x'$ and $y'$? One way is to solve those first equations for $x$ and $y$, then substitute into $2x-3y$ and simplify. In this case, you’re given that $$beginbmatrixx'\y'endbmatrix = T beginbmatrixx\yendbmatrix,tag1$$ so solving for $x$ and $y$ is a simple matter of computing $T^-1$.



                    You could also work directly with vectors and matrices. The equation of the line can be written as $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrix beginbmatrixx\yendbmatrix = 0tag2$$ (verify this). Substituting from (1) for $[x,y]^T$, this becomes $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrixT^-1beginbmatrixx'\y'endbmatrix = 0tag3,$$ so the coefficients of the transformed equation are the elements of the row vector $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrix beginbmatrix5&2\4&1endbmatrix^-1.$$ I trust that you’re able to compute the value of this expression at this stage of your studies.



                    Incidentally, the vector $[2,-3]^T$ is orthogonal (normal) to the line. Equation (3) shows that such normal vectors transform differently than do vectors that represent points: If the point transformation is given by $mathbf v' = Mmathbf v$, then a normal vector $mathbf n$ transforms as $mathbf n' = M^-Tmathbf n$. (The $-T$ superscript means “inverse transpose.”)






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    It might help to think of the problem this way: If you’ve been given some equations that describe the relationship between the pairs of variables $(x,y)$ and $(x',y')$, how might you express the equation $2x-3y=0$ in terms of $x'$ and $y'$? One way is to solve those first equations for $x$ and $y$, then substitute into $2x-3y$ and simplify. In this case, you’re given that $$beginbmatrixx'\y'endbmatrix = T beginbmatrixx\yendbmatrix,tag1$$ so solving for $x$ and $y$ is a simple matter of computing $T^-1$.



                    You could also work directly with vectors and matrices. The equation of the line can be written as $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrix beginbmatrixx\yendbmatrix = 0tag2$$ (verify this). Substituting from (1) for $[x,y]^T$, this becomes $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrixT^-1beginbmatrixx'\y'endbmatrix = 0tag3,$$ so the coefficients of the transformed equation are the elements of the row vector $$beginbmatrix2&-3endbmatrix beginbmatrix5&2\4&1endbmatrix^-1.$$ I trust that you’re able to compute the value of this expression at this stage of your studies.



                    Incidentally, the vector $[2,-3]^T$ is orthogonal (normal) to the line. Equation (3) shows that such normal vectors transform differently than do vectors that represent points: If the point transformation is given by $mathbf v' = Mmathbf v$, then a normal vector $mathbf n$ transforms as $mathbf n' = M^-Tmathbf n$. (The $-T$ superscript means “inverse transpose.”)







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Mar 15 at 19:53









                    amdamd

                    31.1k21051




                    31.1k21051











                    • $begingroup$
                      But $T$ might not be invertible everytime.
                      $endgroup$
                      – chhro
                      Mar 15 at 22:05










                    • $begingroup$
                      @chhro That’s no different from not being able to solve for $x$ and $y$ in the first paragraph. In that case, you have to use another method. Happily, $T^-1$ exists in the specific instance. It wasn’t my intent to provide a comprehensive answer replete with obfuscating details. One could quibble that the given line might not pass through the origin, in which case the method in your answer doesn’t quite apply.
                      $endgroup$
                      – amd
                      Mar 15 at 23:15











                    • $begingroup$
                      Very interesting approach @amd . Ty for take your time to add more details and rich information. :)
                      $endgroup$
                      – miguel747
                      Mar 16 at 1:55










                    • $begingroup$
                      I'm sure my argument works even if the given line is not a subspace since it is independent of the given linear transformation $T$. It's essentially the idea in MarianD's answer.
                      $endgroup$
                      – chhro
                      Mar 19 at 20:43










                    • $begingroup$
                      @chhro You’re tacitly taking advantage of the fact that $T(0)=0$. When the line isn’t a subspace, it does not suffice to check where $T$ sends a single point on the line.
                      $endgroup$
                      – amd
                      Mar 19 at 20:47

















                    • $begingroup$
                      But $T$ might not be invertible everytime.
                      $endgroup$
                      – chhro
                      Mar 15 at 22:05










                    • $begingroup$
                      @chhro That’s no different from not being able to solve for $x$ and $y$ in the first paragraph. In that case, you have to use another method. Happily, $T^-1$ exists in the specific instance. It wasn’t my intent to provide a comprehensive answer replete with obfuscating details. One could quibble that the given line might not pass through the origin, in which case the method in your answer doesn’t quite apply.
                      $endgroup$
                      – amd
                      Mar 15 at 23:15











                    • $begingroup$
                      Very interesting approach @amd . Ty for take your time to add more details and rich information. :)
                      $endgroup$
                      – miguel747
                      Mar 16 at 1:55










                    • $begingroup$
                      I'm sure my argument works even if the given line is not a subspace since it is independent of the given linear transformation $T$. It's essentially the idea in MarianD's answer.
                      $endgroup$
                      – chhro
                      Mar 19 at 20:43










                    • $begingroup$
                      @chhro You’re tacitly taking advantage of the fact that $T(0)=0$. When the line isn’t a subspace, it does not suffice to check where $T$ sends a single point on the line.
                      $endgroup$
                      – amd
                      Mar 19 at 20:47
















                    $begingroup$
                    But $T$ might not be invertible everytime.
                    $endgroup$
                    – chhro
                    Mar 15 at 22:05




                    $begingroup$
                    But $T$ might not be invertible everytime.
                    $endgroup$
                    – chhro
                    Mar 15 at 22:05












                    $begingroup$
                    @chhro That’s no different from not being able to solve for $x$ and $y$ in the first paragraph. In that case, you have to use another method. Happily, $T^-1$ exists in the specific instance. It wasn’t my intent to provide a comprehensive answer replete with obfuscating details. One could quibble that the given line might not pass through the origin, in which case the method in your answer doesn’t quite apply.
                    $endgroup$
                    – amd
                    Mar 15 at 23:15





                    $begingroup$
                    @chhro That’s no different from not being able to solve for $x$ and $y$ in the first paragraph. In that case, you have to use another method. Happily, $T^-1$ exists in the specific instance. It wasn’t my intent to provide a comprehensive answer replete with obfuscating details. One could quibble that the given line might not pass through the origin, in which case the method in your answer doesn’t quite apply.
                    $endgroup$
                    – amd
                    Mar 15 at 23:15













                    $begingroup$
                    Very interesting approach @amd . Ty for take your time to add more details and rich information. :)
                    $endgroup$
                    – miguel747
                    Mar 16 at 1:55




                    $begingroup$
                    Very interesting approach @amd . Ty for take your time to add more details and rich information. :)
                    $endgroup$
                    – miguel747
                    Mar 16 at 1:55












                    $begingroup$
                    I'm sure my argument works even if the given line is not a subspace since it is independent of the given linear transformation $T$. It's essentially the idea in MarianD's answer.
                    $endgroup$
                    – chhro
                    Mar 19 at 20:43




                    $begingroup$
                    I'm sure my argument works even if the given line is not a subspace since it is independent of the given linear transformation $T$. It's essentially the idea in MarianD's answer.
                    $endgroup$
                    – chhro
                    Mar 19 at 20:43












                    $begingroup$
                    @chhro You’re tacitly taking advantage of the fact that $T(0)=0$. When the line isn’t a subspace, it does not suffice to check where $T$ sends a single point on the line.
                    $endgroup$
                    – amd
                    Mar 19 at 20:47





                    $begingroup$
                    @chhro You’re tacitly taking advantage of the fact that $T(0)=0$. When the line isn’t a subspace, it does not suffice to check where $T$ sends a single point on the line.
                    $endgroup$
                    – amd
                    Mar 19 at 20:47












                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    STEP 1. Realize that $《x, y》: 2x + 3y = 0$ is a subspace.



                    STEP 2. find the basis for the subspace. It is $(1, 2/3)$.



                    STEP 3. Do matrix multiplication.



                    $$left[ beginmatrix
                    5 & 2 \
                    4 & 1 \
                    endmatrixright ]
                    left[ beginmatrix
                    1 \
                    2/3 \
                    endmatrixright ] =
                    left[ beginmatrix
                    19/3\
                    14/3 \
                    endmatrixright ]$$



                    STEP 4. Translate back into equation form.



                    $$P_1 = alpha left[ beginmatrix
                    19/3 \
                    4/3 \
                    endmatrixright ]$$
                    and $$P_2 = beta left[ beginmatrix
                    19/3 \
                    4/3 \
                    endmatrixright ]$$
                    . Plug these two points (interpreting the top entries as x coordinate and bottom entries as y-coordinate). Use the point-slope equation $$y = fracy_2-y_1x_2 - x_1x$$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      y2 is the y-coordinate of P2. x2 is the x-coordinate of P2. y1 is the y-coordinate of P1. x1 is the x-coordinate of P1.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tomislav Ostojich
                      Mar 16 at 2:01















                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    STEP 1. Realize that $《x, y》: 2x + 3y = 0$ is a subspace.



                    STEP 2. find the basis for the subspace. It is $(1, 2/3)$.



                    STEP 3. Do matrix multiplication.



                    $$left[ beginmatrix
                    5 & 2 \
                    4 & 1 \
                    endmatrixright ]
                    left[ beginmatrix
                    1 \
                    2/3 \
                    endmatrixright ] =
                    left[ beginmatrix
                    19/3\
                    14/3 \
                    endmatrixright ]$$



                    STEP 4. Translate back into equation form.



                    $$P_1 = alpha left[ beginmatrix
                    19/3 \
                    4/3 \
                    endmatrixright ]$$
                    and $$P_2 = beta left[ beginmatrix
                    19/3 \
                    4/3 \
                    endmatrixright ]$$
                    . Plug these two points (interpreting the top entries as x coordinate and bottom entries as y-coordinate). Use the point-slope equation $$y = fracy_2-y_1x_2 - x_1x$$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      y2 is the y-coordinate of P2. x2 is the x-coordinate of P2. y1 is the y-coordinate of P1. x1 is the x-coordinate of P1.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tomislav Ostojich
                      Mar 16 at 2:01













                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    STEP 1. Realize that $《x, y》: 2x + 3y = 0$ is a subspace.



                    STEP 2. find the basis for the subspace. It is $(1, 2/3)$.



                    STEP 3. Do matrix multiplication.



                    $$left[ beginmatrix
                    5 & 2 \
                    4 & 1 \
                    endmatrixright ]
                    left[ beginmatrix
                    1 \
                    2/3 \
                    endmatrixright ] =
                    left[ beginmatrix
                    19/3\
                    14/3 \
                    endmatrixright ]$$



                    STEP 4. Translate back into equation form.



                    $$P_1 = alpha left[ beginmatrix
                    19/3 \
                    4/3 \
                    endmatrixright ]$$
                    and $$P_2 = beta left[ beginmatrix
                    19/3 \
                    4/3 \
                    endmatrixright ]$$
                    . Plug these two points (interpreting the top entries as x coordinate and bottom entries as y-coordinate). Use the point-slope equation $$y = fracy_2-y_1x_2 - x_1x$$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    STEP 1. Realize that $《x, y》: 2x + 3y = 0$ is a subspace.



                    STEP 2. find the basis for the subspace. It is $(1, 2/3)$.



                    STEP 3. Do matrix multiplication.



                    $$left[ beginmatrix
                    5 & 2 \
                    4 & 1 \
                    endmatrixright ]
                    left[ beginmatrix
                    1 \
                    2/3 \
                    endmatrixright ] =
                    left[ beginmatrix
                    19/3\
                    14/3 \
                    endmatrixright ]$$



                    STEP 4. Translate back into equation form.



                    $$P_1 = alpha left[ beginmatrix
                    19/3 \
                    4/3 \
                    endmatrixright ]$$
                    and $$P_2 = beta left[ beginmatrix
                    19/3 \
                    4/3 \
                    endmatrixright ]$$
                    . Plug these two points (interpreting the top entries as x coordinate and bottom entries as y-coordinate). Use the point-slope equation $$y = fracy_2-y_1x_2 - x_1x$$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Mar 16 at 2:01

























                    answered Mar 16 at 1:00









                    Tomislav OstojichTomislav Ostojich

                    761718




                    761718







                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      y2 is the y-coordinate of P2. x2 is the x-coordinate of P2. y1 is the y-coordinate of P1. x1 is the x-coordinate of P1.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tomislav Ostojich
                      Mar 16 at 2:01












                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      y2 is the y-coordinate of P2. x2 is the x-coordinate of P2. y1 is the y-coordinate of P1. x1 is the x-coordinate of P1.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tomislav Ostojich
                      Mar 16 at 2:01







                    1




                    1




                    $begingroup$
                    y2 is the y-coordinate of P2. x2 is the x-coordinate of P2. y1 is the y-coordinate of P1. x1 is the x-coordinate of P1.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Tomislav Ostojich
                    Mar 16 at 2:01




                    $begingroup$
                    y2 is the y-coordinate of P2. x2 is the x-coordinate of P2. y1 is the y-coordinate of P1. x1 is the x-coordinate of P1.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Tomislav Ostojich
                    Mar 16 at 2:01

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3149589%2ffind-the-image-2x-3y-0-given-matrix-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye