Is it true that if inclusion of a boundary component is a homotopy equivalence then the manifold deformation retracts onto it?Is it possible for a closed manifold to deformation retract onto a proper subset of itself?Homotopy equivalence iff both spaces are deformation retractshomotopy type of the manifold minus the boundaryIs it possible for a closed manifold to deformation retract onto a proper subset of itself?Homework: The Klein bottle retracts onto a loop.Show that $X$ deformation retracts to any point in the segment $[0,1]times lbrace 0 rbrace$, but not to any other point.Does the homotopy equivalence of a space with its subspace imply deformation retract?How to show if $A subset V subset X$ and $V$ deformation retracts onto $A$, then $H_n(X,A) simeq H_n(X,V)$.Examples for a contractible pair that induce a non-surjective fundamental groups homomorphism.Does there exist a compact manifold with boundary $M$ that is contractible but does not (strong) deformation retract onto a point?If $Sigma$ is a homotopy sphere, then $Sigma#(-Sigma)$ bounds a contractible manifold.
Can anyone tell me why this program fails?
Is it true that real estate prices mainly go up?
Employee lack of ownership
I need to drive a 7/16" nut but am unsure how to use the socket I bought for my screwdriver
Is it normal that my co-workers at a fitness company criticize my food choices?
Science-fiction short story where space navy wanted hospital ships and settlers had guns mounted everywhere
How to answer questions about my characters?
Schematic conventions for different supply rails
Did CPM support custom hardware using device drivers?
Replacing Windows 7 security updates with anti-virus?
Is a lawful good "antagonist" effective?
Identifying the interval from A♭ to D♯
Happy pi day, everyone!
Using "wallow" verb with object
Do I need life insurance if I can cover my own funeral costs?
Can elves maintain concentration in a trance?
Russian cases: A few examples, I'm really confused
Sword in the Stone story where the sword was held in place by electromagnets
Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?
Welcoming 2019 Pi day: How to draw the letter π?
Does splitting a potentially monolithic application into several smaller ones help prevent bugs?
Why does Deadpool say "You're welcome, Canada," after shooting Ryan Reynolds in the end credits?
Why would a flight no longer considered airworthy be redirected like this?
Where is the 1/8 CR apprentice in Volo's Guide to Monsters?
Is it true that if inclusion of a boundary component is a homotopy equivalence then the manifold deformation retracts onto it?
Is it possible for a closed manifold to deformation retract onto a proper subset of itself?Homotopy equivalence iff both spaces are deformation retractshomotopy type of the manifold minus the boundaryIs it possible for a closed manifold to deformation retract onto a proper subset of itself?Homework: The Klein bottle retracts onto a loop.Show that $X$ deformation retracts to any point in the segment $[0,1]times lbrace 0 rbrace$, but not to any other point.Does the homotopy equivalence of a space with its subspace imply deformation retract?How to show if $A subset V subset X$ and $V$ deformation retracts onto $A$, then $H_n(X,A) simeq H_n(X,V)$.Examples for a contractible pair that induce a non-surjective fundamental groups homomorphism.Does there exist a compact manifold with boundary $M$ that is contractible but does not (strong) deformation retract onto a point?If $Sigma$ is a homotopy sphere, then $Sigma#(-Sigma)$ bounds a contractible manifold.
$begingroup$
In topological spaces, if $Asubset X$ and the inclusion is a homotopy equivalence, that doesn't imply that $X$ deformation retracts onto $A$. For example take one of those examples of a contractible space that doesn't deformation retract to a point.
Even in manifolds, a closed manifold doesn't deformation retract to any proper subset, one can show that with homology as done here by Olivier Bégassat.
So my question is: in the case of a manifold with boundary $(M,partial M)$, with $Nsubset partial M$ a boundary component such that $Nhookrightarrow M$ is a homotopy equivalence, is it true that $M$ deformation retracts onto $N$?
Feel free to assume more hypothesis if needed.
general-topology geometry differential-geometry algebraic-topology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In topological spaces, if $Asubset X$ and the inclusion is a homotopy equivalence, that doesn't imply that $X$ deformation retracts onto $A$. For example take one of those examples of a contractible space that doesn't deformation retract to a point.
Even in manifolds, a closed manifold doesn't deformation retract to any proper subset, one can show that with homology as done here by Olivier Bégassat.
So my question is: in the case of a manifold with boundary $(M,partial M)$, with $Nsubset partial M$ a boundary component such that $Nhookrightarrow M$ is a homotopy equivalence, is it true that $M$ deformation retracts onto $N$?
Feel free to assume more hypothesis if needed.
general-topology geometry differential-geometry algebraic-topology
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
If everything in question is simply connected and of high enough dimension than it is even isomorphic to a cylinder by poincare duality and the h-cobordism theorem. I guess the S-cobordism theorem is a good place to look for counterexamples for non-simply connected things.
$endgroup$
– ThorbenK
Mar 11 at 12:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In topological spaces, if $Asubset X$ and the inclusion is a homotopy equivalence, that doesn't imply that $X$ deformation retracts onto $A$. For example take one of those examples of a contractible space that doesn't deformation retract to a point.
Even in manifolds, a closed manifold doesn't deformation retract to any proper subset, one can show that with homology as done here by Olivier Bégassat.
So my question is: in the case of a manifold with boundary $(M,partial M)$, with $Nsubset partial M$ a boundary component such that $Nhookrightarrow M$ is a homotopy equivalence, is it true that $M$ deformation retracts onto $N$?
Feel free to assume more hypothesis if needed.
general-topology geometry differential-geometry algebraic-topology
$endgroup$
In topological spaces, if $Asubset X$ and the inclusion is a homotopy equivalence, that doesn't imply that $X$ deformation retracts onto $A$. For example take one of those examples of a contractible space that doesn't deformation retract to a point.
Even in manifolds, a closed manifold doesn't deformation retract to any proper subset, one can show that with homology as done here by Olivier Bégassat.
So my question is: in the case of a manifold with boundary $(M,partial M)$, with $Nsubset partial M$ a boundary component such that $Nhookrightarrow M$ is a homotopy equivalence, is it true that $M$ deformation retracts onto $N$?
Feel free to assume more hypothesis if needed.
general-topology geometry differential-geometry algebraic-topology
general-topology geometry differential-geometry algebraic-topology
edited 2 days ago
giulio
asked Mar 11 at 8:55
giuliogiulio
473413
473413
1
$begingroup$
If everything in question is simply connected and of high enough dimension than it is even isomorphic to a cylinder by poincare duality and the h-cobordism theorem. I guess the S-cobordism theorem is a good place to look for counterexamples for non-simply connected things.
$endgroup$
– ThorbenK
Mar 11 at 12:42
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
If everything in question is simply connected and of high enough dimension than it is even isomorphic to a cylinder by poincare duality and the h-cobordism theorem. I guess the S-cobordism theorem is a good place to look for counterexamples for non-simply connected things.
$endgroup$
– ThorbenK
Mar 11 at 12:42
1
1
$begingroup$
If everything in question is simply connected and of high enough dimension than it is even isomorphic to a cylinder by poincare duality and the h-cobordism theorem. I guess the S-cobordism theorem is a good place to look for counterexamples for non-simply connected things.
$endgroup$
– ThorbenK
Mar 11 at 12:42
$begingroup$
If everything in question is simply connected and of high enough dimension than it is even isomorphic to a cylinder by poincare duality and the h-cobordism theorem. I guess the S-cobordism theorem is a good place to look for counterexamples for non-simply connected things.
$endgroup$
– ThorbenK
Mar 11 at 12:42
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, you get a deformation retract. More formally...
Suppose $M$ is a topological manifold, $Nsubseteq partial M subseteq M$ is a component of $partial M$ and that the inclusion $Nrightarrow M$ is a homotopy equivalence. Then $M$ deformation retracts to $N$.
Here's the idea of the proof:
From Hatcher Algebraic Topology, Corollary 0.20 (pg. 16 in my copy), it's enough to show that $(M,N)$ has the homotopy extension property.
Now, boundary components in topological manifolds are known to have collar neighborhoods (see Morton Brown, "Locally flat imbeddings of topological manifolds", Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 75 (1962), p. 331-341.) This is more well-known in the smooth category, where it is also much easier to prove.
So, some closed neighborhood of $N$ in $M$ is of the form $Ntimes [0,1] = Ntimes I$, where we are identifying $N$ with $Ntimes 0subseteq M$..
Now suppose $f:Mrightarrow X$ is a continuous function (where $X$ is any topological space). Suppose $F:Ntimes Irightarrow X$ has the property that $F(n,1) = f(n)$. We wish to find a continuous function $G:Mtimes Irightarrow X$ satisfying two conditions. First, for any $nin N$, $tin I$, that $G(n,t) = F(n,t)$. Second, for any $min M$, $G(m,1) = f(m)$.
To that end, set $G(m,t) = begincases f(m) & mnotin Ntimes [0,1]\ F(n, maxs,t) & m=(n,s)in Ntimes [0,1].endcases$
To check the first condition, note that $nin Ncong Ntimes 0$ means the corresonding $s$ is $s= 0$. Since $tin[0,1]$, $maxs,t = max0,t= t$, so $G(n,t) = F(n,t).$
To check the second condition, we have $G(m,t) = f(m)$ if $mnotin Ntimes [0,1]$, regardless of the value of $t$. On the other hand, if $m = (n,s)in Ntimes [0,1]$, then because we are taking $t=1$, we have $maxs,t = t$. So $G(m,1) = F(m,1) = f(m)$.
Finally, we must verify that $G$ is actually a continuous function. Since $f,F,$ and $max$ are all continuous, we see that $G$ is a continuous funciton ... as long as it is a function. That is, we still need to verify that $G$ is well defined at the "transition" points where $s = 1$.
But, if $min Ntimes [0,1]$ is of the form $m = (n,1)$, then $s=1$, so $maxs,t = s=1$, so $G(m) = F(n, maxs,t) = F(n,1) = f(n).$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1 for pointing out that you just need to verify the homotopy extension property.
$endgroup$
– William
Mar 11 at 17:35
$begingroup$
For the existence of collar neighborhoods of the boundary, an easier proof is also in Hatcher: proposition 3.42, p. 253. He proves this for compact manifolds but observes that the same proof works for paracompact manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Moishe: Thanks for the reference! I had originally written this answer with $M$ a smooth manifold and realized the argument could generalize if topological manifolds with boundary had collars. I googled it, and that Annals paper came up. But it's nice to have a textbook reference!
$endgroup$
– Jason DeVito
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3143459%2fis-it-true-that-if-inclusion-of-a-boundary-component-is-a-homotopy-equivalence-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, you get a deformation retract. More formally...
Suppose $M$ is a topological manifold, $Nsubseteq partial M subseteq M$ is a component of $partial M$ and that the inclusion $Nrightarrow M$ is a homotopy equivalence. Then $M$ deformation retracts to $N$.
Here's the idea of the proof:
From Hatcher Algebraic Topology, Corollary 0.20 (pg. 16 in my copy), it's enough to show that $(M,N)$ has the homotopy extension property.
Now, boundary components in topological manifolds are known to have collar neighborhoods (see Morton Brown, "Locally flat imbeddings of topological manifolds", Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 75 (1962), p. 331-341.) This is more well-known in the smooth category, where it is also much easier to prove.
So, some closed neighborhood of $N$ in $M$ is of the form $Ntimes [0,1] = Ntimes I$, where we are identifying $N$ with $Ntimes 0subseteq M$..
Now suppose $f:Mrightarrow X$ is a continuous function (where $X$ is any topological space). Suppose $F:Ntimes Irightarrow X$ has the property that $F(n,1) = f(n)$. We wish to find a continuous function $G:Mtimes Irightarrow X$ satisfying two conditions. First, for any $nin N$, $tin I$, that $G(n,t) = F(n,t)$. Second, for any $min M$, $G(m,1) = f(m)$.
To that end, set $G(m,t) = begincases f(m) & mnotin Ntimes [0,1]\ F(n, maxs,t) & m=(n,s)in Ntimes [0,1].endcases$
To check the first condition, note that $nin Ncong Ntimes 0$ means the corresonding $s$ is $s= 0$. Since $tin[0,1]$, $maxs,t = max0,t= t$, so $G(n,t) = F(n,t).$
To check the second condition, we have $G(m,t) = f(m)$ if $mnotin Ntimes [0,1]$, regardless of the value of $t$. On the other hand, if $m = (n,s)in Ntimes [0,1]$, then because we are taking $t=1$, we have $maxs,t = t$. So $G(m,1) = F(m,1) = f(m)$.
Finally, we must verify that $G$ is actually a continuous function. Since $f,F,$ and $max$ are all continuous, we see that $G$ is a continuous funciton ... as long as it is a function. That is, we still need to verify that $G$ is well defined at the "transition" points where $s = 1$.
But, if $min Ntimes [0,1]$ is of the form $m = (n,1)$, then $s=1$, so $maxs,t = s=1$, so $G(m) = F(n, maxs,t) = F(n,1) = f(n).$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1 for pointing out that you just need to verify the homotopy extension property.
$endgroup$
– William
Mar 11 at 17:35
$begingroup$
For the existence of collar neighborhoods of the boundary, an easier proof is also in Hatcher: proposition 3.42, p. 253. He proves this for compact manifolds but observes that the same proof works for paracompact manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Moishe: Thanks for the reference! I had originally written this answer with $M$ a smooth manifold and realized the argument could generalize if topological manifolds with boundary had collars. I googled it, and that Annals paper came up. But it's nice to have a textbook reference!
$endgroup$
– Jason DeVito
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, you get a deformation retract. More formally...
Suppose $M$ is a topological manifold, $Nsubseteq partial M subseteq M$ is a component of $partial M$ and that the inclusion $Nrightarrow M$ is a homotopy equivalence. Then $M$ deformation retracts to $N$.
Here's the idea of the proof:
From Hatcher Algebraic Topology, Corollary 0.20 (pg. 16 in my copy), it's enough to show that $(M,N)$ has the homotopy extension property.
Now, boundary components in topological manifolds are known to have collar neighborhoods (see Morton Brown, "Locally flat imbeddings of topological manifolds", Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 75 (1962), p. 331-341.) This is more well-known in the smooth category, where it is also much easier to prove.
So, some closed neighborhood of $N$ in $M$ is of the form $Ntimes [0,1] = Ntimes I$, where we are identifying $N$ with $Ntimes 0subseteq M$..
Now suppose $f:Mrightarrow X$ is a continuous function (where $X$ is any topological space). Suppose $F:Ntimes Irightarrow X$ has the property that $F(n,1) = f(n)$. We wish to find a continuous function $G:Mtimes Irightarrow X$ satisfying two conditions. First, for any $nin N$, $tin I$, that $G(n,t) = F(n,t)$. Second, for any $min M$, $G(m,1) = f(m)$.
To that end, set $G(m,t) = begincases f(m) & mnotin Ntimes [0,1]\ F(n, maxs,t) & m=(n,s)in Ntimes [0,1].endcases$
To check the first condition, note that $nin Ncong Ntimes 0$ means the corresonding $s$ is $s= 0$. Since $tin[0,1]$, $maxs,t = max0,t= t$, so $G(n,t) = F(n,t).$
To check the second condition, we have $G(m,t) = f(m)$ if $mnotin Ntimes [0,1]$, regardless of the value of $t$. On the other hand, if $m = (n,s)in Ntimes [0,1]$, then because we are taking $t=1$, we have $maxs,t = t$. So $G(m,1) = F(m,1) = f(m)$.
Finally, we must verify that $G$ is actually a continuous function. Since $f,F,$ and $max$ are all continuous, we see that $G$ is a continuous funciton ... as long as it is a function. That is, we still need to verify that $G$ is well defined at the "transition" points where $s = 1$.
But, if $min Ntimes [0,1]$ is of the form $m = (n,1)$, then $s=1$, so $maxs,t = s=1$, so $G(m) = F(n, maxs,t) = F(n,1) = f(n).$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
+1 for pointing out that you just need to verify the homotopy extension property.
$endgroup$
– William
Mar 11 at 17:35
$begingroup$
For the existence of collar neighborhoods of the boundary, an easier proof is also in Hatcher: proposition 3.42, p. 253. He proves this for compact manifolds but observes that the same proof works for paracompact manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Moishe: Thanks for the reference! I had originally written this answer with $M$ a smooth manifold and realized the argument could generalize if topological manifolds with boundary had collars. I googled it, and that Annals paper came up. But it's nice to have a textbook reference!
$endgroup$
– Jason DeVito
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, you get a deformation retract. More formally...
Suppose $M$ is a topological manifold, $Nsubseteq partial M subseteq M$ is a component of $partial M$ and that the inclusion $Nrightarrow M$ is a homotopy equivalence. Then $M$ deformation retracts to $N$.
Here's the idea of the proof:
From Hatcher Algebraic Topology, Corollary 0.20 (pg. 16 in my copy), it's enough to show that $(M,N)$ has the homotopy extension property.
Now, boundary components in topological manifolds are known to have collar neighborhoods (see Morton Brown, "Locally flat imbeddings of topological manifolds", Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 75 (1962), p. 331-341.) This is more well-known in the smooth category, where it is also much easier to prove.
So, some closed neighborhood of $N$ in $M$ is of the form $Ntimes [0,1] = Ntimes I$, where we are identifying $N$ with $Ntimes 0subseteq M$..
Now suppose $f:Mrightarrow X$ is a continuous function (where $X$ is any topological space). Suppose $F:Ntimes Irightarrow X$ has the property that $F(n,1) = f(n)$. We wish to find a continuous function $G:Mtimes Irightarrow X$ satisfying two conditions. First, for any $nin N$, $tin I$, that $G(n,t) = F(n,t)$. Second, for any $min M$, $G(m,1) = f(m)$.
To that end, set $G(m,t) = begincases f(m) & mnotin Ntimes [0,1]\ F(n, maxs,t) & m=(n,s)in Ntimes [0,1].endcases$
To check the first condition, note that $nin Ncong Ntimes 0$ means the corresonding $s$ is $s= 0$. Since $tin[0,1]$, $maxs,t = max0,t= t$, so $G(n,t) = F(n,t).$
To check the second condition, we have $G(m,t) = f(m)$ if $mnotin Ntimes [0,1]$, regardless of the value of $t$. On the other hand, if $m = (n,s)in Ntimes [0,1]$, then because we are taking $t=1$, we have $maxs,t = t$. So $G(m,1) = F(m,1) = f(m)$.
Finally, we must verify that $G$ is actually a continuous function. Since $f,F,$ and $max$ are all continuous, we see that $G$ is a continuous funciton ... as long as it is a function. That is, we still need to verify that $G$ is well defined at the "transition" points where $s = 1$.
But, if $min Ntimes [0,1]$ is of the form $m = (n,1)$, then $s=1$, so $maxs,t = s=1$, so $G(m) = F(n, maxs,t) = F(n,1) = f(n).$
$endgroup$
Yes, you get a deformation retract. More formally...
Suppose $M$ is a topological manifold, $Nsubseteq partial M subseteq M$ is a component of $partial M$ and that the inclusion $Nrightarrow M$ is a homotopy equivalence. Then $M$ deformation retracts to $N$.
Here's the idea of the proof:
From Hatcher Algebraic Topology, Corollary 0.20 (pg. 16 in my copy), it's enough to show that $(M,N)$ has the homotopy extension property.
Now, boundary components in topological manifolds are known to have collar neighborhoods (see Morton Brown, "Locally flat imbeddings of topological manifolds", Annals of Mathematics, Vol. 75 (1962), p. 331-341.) This is more well-known in the smooth category, where it is also much easier to prove.
So, some closed neighborhood of $N$ in $M$ is of the form $Ntimes [0,1] = Ntimes I$, where we are identifying $N$ with $Ntimes 0subseteq M$..
Now suppose $f:Mrightarrow X$ is a continuous function (where $X$ is any topological space). Suppose $F:Ntimes Irightarrow X$ has the property that $F(n,1) = f(n)$. We wish to find a continuous function $G:Mtimes Irightarrow X$ satisfying two conditions. First, for any $nin N$, $tin I$, that $G(n,t) = F(n,t)$. Second, for any $min M$, $G(m,1) = f(m)$.
To that end, set $G(m,t) = begincases f(m) & mnotin Ntimes [0,1]\ F(n, maxs,t) & m=(n,s)in Ntimes [0,1].endcases$
To check the first condition, note that $nin Ncong Ntimes 0$ means the corresonding $s$ is $s= 0$. Since $tin[0,1]$, $maxs,t = max0,t= t$, so $G(n,t) = F(n,t).$
To check the second condition, we have $G(m,t) = f(m)$ if $mnotin Ntimes [0,1]$, regardless of the value of $t$. On the other hand, if $m = (n,s)in Ntimes [0,1]$, then because we are taking $t=1$, we have $maxs,t = t$. So $G(m,1) = F(m,1) = f(m)$.
Finally, we must verify that $G$ is actually a continuous function. Since $f,F,$ and $max$ are all continuous, we see that $G$ is a continuous funciton ... as long as it is a function. That is, we still need to verify that $G$ is well defined at the "transition" points where $s = 1$.
But, if $min Ntimes [0,1]$ is of the form $m = (n,1)$, then $s=1$, so $maxs,t = s=1$, so $G(m) = F(n, maxs,t) = F(n,1) = f(n).$
edited 2 days ago
answered Mar 11 at 17:29
Jason DeVitoJason DeVito
31.2k475136
31.2k475136
$begingroup$
+1 for pointing out that you just need to verify the homotopy extension property.
$endgroup$
– William
Mar 11 at 17:35
$begingroup$
For the existence of collar neighborhoods of the boundary, an easier proof is also in Hatcher: proposition 3.42, p. 253. He proves this for compact manifolds but observes that the same proof works for paracompact manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Moishe: Thanks for the reference! I had originally written this answer with $M$ a smooth manifold and realized the argument could generalize if topological manifolds with boundary had collars. I googled it, and that Annals paper came up. But it's nice to have a textbook reference!
$endgroup$
– Jason DeVito
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
+1 for pointing out that you just need to verify the homotopy extension property.
$endgroup$
– William
Mar 11 at 17:35
$begingroup$
For the existence of collar neighborhoods of the boundary, an easier proof is also in Hatcher: proposition 3.42, p. 253. He proves this for compact manifolds but observes that the same proof works for paracompact manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Moishe: Thanks for the reference! I had originally written this answer with $M$ a smooth manifold and realized the argument could generalize if topological manifolds with boundary had collars. I googled it, and that Annals paper came up. But it's nice to have a textbook reference!
$endgroup$
– Jason DeVito
yesterday
$begingroup$
+1 for pointing out that you just need to verify the homotopy extension property.
$endgroup$
– William
Mar 11 at 17:35
$begingroup$
+1 for pointing out that you just need to verify the homotopy extension property.
$endgroup$
– William
Mar 11 at 17:35
$begingroup$
For the existence of collar neighborhoods of the boundary, an easier proof is also in Hatcher: proposition 3.42, p. 253. He proves this for compact manifolds but observes that the same proof works for paracompact manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
For the existence of collar neighborhoods of the boundary, an easier proof is also in Hatcher: proposition 3.42, p. 253. He proves this for compact manifolds but observes that the same proof works for paracompact manifolds.
$endgroup$
– Moishe Kohan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Moishe: Thanks for the reference! I had originally written this answer with $M$ a smooth manifold and realized the argument could generalize if topological manifolds with boundary had collars. I googled it, and that Annals paper came up. But it's nice to have a textbook reference!
$endgroup$
– Jason DeVito
yesterday
$begingroup$
Moishe: Thanks for the reference! I had originally written this answer with $M$ a smooth manifold and realized the argument could generalize if topological manifolds with boundary had collars. I googled it, and that Annals paper came up. But it's nice to have a textbook reference!
$endgroup$
– Jason DeVito
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3143459%2fis-it-true-that-if-inclusion-of-a-boundary-component-is-a-homotopy-equivalence-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
If everything in question is simply connected and of high enough dimension than it is even isomorphic to a cylinder by poincare duality and the h-cobordism theorem. I guess the S-cobordism theorem is a good place to look for counterexamples for non-simply connected things.
$endgroup$
– ThorbenK
Mar 11 at 12:42