Does injectivity of dual imply injectivity of pullback by a surjective submersion?When is the pullback of a linear injection a surjection on dual space?Does monotonicity imply surjectivity?Projection of fiber bundle is a submersionDetailed proof (submersion) : show that the differential is surjectiveWhy do we need to suppose finite dimension to prove dual of linear map $L$ is injective $Rightarrow$ $L$ is surjective?Pullback of diffrential forms in surjective submersionsDescribe $f$ in terms of the tensor products of $alpha^i$ and $alpha^j$. Is this inner product? What are its coefficients?Derivations of bases of $A_k(V)$ and $L_k(V)$: what's the difference?Matrix-based proof of transformation rule for a wedge product of covectors by wedge product of covectorsWhy is $e^it$ a submersion, and what is the relationship between the derivative $dot h(t)$ and the differential $h_*,t$?

Know when to turn notes upside-down(eighth notes, sixteen notes, etc.)

Good allowance savings plan?

Current sense amp + op-amp buffer + ADC: Measuring down to 0 with single supply

Running a subshell from the middle of the current command

Does the statement `int val = (++i > ++j) ? ++i : ++j;` invoke undefined behavior?

Why are there 40 737 Max planes in flight when they have been grounded as not airworthy?

Life insurance that covers only simultaneous/dual deaths

How to simplify this time periods definition interface?

Calculus II Professor will not accept my correct integral evaluation that uses a different method, should I bring this up further?

Is it possible to upcast ritual spells?

How to answer questions about my characters?

Identifying the interval from A♭ to D♯

What is this large pipe coming out of my roof?

What is the greatest age difference between a married couple in Tanach?

Science-fiction short story where space navy wanted hospital ships and settlers had guns mounted everywhere

Is a lawful good "antagonist" effective?

Is it true that real estate prices mainly go up?

Importance of differentiation

Can elves maintain concentration in a trance?

Make a transparent 448*448 image

It's a yearly task, alright

Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?

Why do Australian milk farmers need to protest supermarkets' milk price?

Why doesn't the EU now just force the UK to choose between referendum and no-deal?



Does injectivity of dual imply injectivity of pullback by a surjective submersion?


When is the pullback of a linear injection a surjection on dual space?Does monotonicity imply surjectivity?Projection of fiber bundle is a submersionDetailed proof (submersion) : show that the differential is surjectiveWhy do we need to suppose finite dimension to prove dual of linear map $L$ is injective $Rightarrow$ $L$ is surjective?Pullback of diffrential forms in surjective submersionsDescribe $f$ in terms of the tensor products of $alpha^i$ and $alpha^j$. Is this inner product? What are its coefficients?Derivations of bases of $A_k(V)$ and $L_k(V)$: what's the difference?Matrix-based proof of transformation rule for a wedge product of covectors by wedge product of covectorsWhy is $e^it$ a submersion, and what is the relationship between the derivative $dot h(t)$ and the differential $h_*,t$?













2












$begingroup$


My book is An Introduction to Manifolds by Loring W. Tu.



Does Problem 18.8 below follow from an earlier exercise?



Problem 18.8 (Pullback by a surjective submersion)



enter image description here



Problem 10.5a (Injectivity of the dual map)



enter image description here



My thought is that just as we have a dual for k-covectors:



enter image description here



enter image description here



So do we have a dual for k-forms, although that might be what this exercise is trying to prove.



One reason I think Problem 10.5a doesn't apply is that that $pi$ is a submersion is used to prove $pi^*$ is injective (see below), while Problem 10.5a does not seem to say anything explicitly about submersions. Either that or the proof below is just a proof that is alternative, direct and doesn't rely on category theory.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    My book is An Introduction to Manifolds by Loring W. Tu.



    Does Problem 18.8 below follow from an earlier exercise?



    Problem 18.8 (Pullback by a surjective submersion)



    enter image description here



    Problem 10.5a (Injectivity of the dual map)



    enter image description here



    My thought is that just as we have a dual for k-covectors:



    enter image description here



    enter image description here



    So do we have a dual for k-forms, although that might be what this exercise is trying to prove.



    One reason I think Problem 10.5a doesn't apply is that that $pi$ is a submersion is used to prove $pi^*$ is injective (see below), while Problem 10.5a does not seem to say anything explicitly about submersions. Either that or the proof below is just a proof that is alternative, direct and doesn't rely on category theory.



    enter image description here










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      My book is An Introduction to Manifolds by Loring W. Tu.



      Does Problem 18.8 below follow from an earlier exercise?



      Problem 18.8 (Pullback by a surjective submersion)



      enter image description here



      Problem 10.5a (Injectivity of the dual map)



      enter image description here



      My thought is that just as we have a dual for k-covectors:



      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      So do we have a dual for k-forms, although that might be what this exercise is trying to prove.



      One reason I think Problem 10.5a doesn't apply is that that $pi$ is a submersion is used to prove $pi^*$ is injective (see below), while Problem 10.5a does not seem to say anything explicitly about submersions. Either that or the proof below is just a proof that is alternative, direct and doesn't rely on category theory.



      enter image description here










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      My book is An Introduction to Manifolds by Loring W. Tu.



      Does Problem 18.8 below follow from an earlier exercise?



      Problem 18.8 (Pullback by a surjective submersion)



      enter image description here



      Problem 10.5a (Injectivity of the dual map)



      enter image description here



      My thought is that just as we have a dual for k-covectors:



      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      So do we have a dual for k-forms, although that might be what this exercise is trying to prove.



      One reason I think Problem 10.5a doesn't apply is that that $pi$ is a submersion is used to prove $pi^*$ is injective (see below), while Problem 10.5a does not seem to say anything explicitly about submersions. Either that or the proof below is just a proof that is alternative, direct and doesn't rely on category theory.



      enter image description here







      linear-algebra abstract-algebra differential-geometry category-theory differential-forms






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 11 at 11:32







      Selene Auckland

















      asked Mar 4 at 6:08









      Selene AucklandSelene Auckland

      6911




      6911




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Problem 18.8 can be proven in the following way (where I hope to not miss anything important hiding under the surface; let me know if you find issues in the proof!).



          You should first note that the pullback map $pi^*$ is the dual map to the map $pi$. Now, a general fact from linear algebra is that for any linear map $f$, $$ftext injective Longleftrightarrow f^*text surjective,\ ftext surjective Longleftrightarrow f^*text injective. $$ So in your case, if $pi$ is surjective, $pi^*$ is an injective homomorphism of vector spaces and you are left showing that it respects the algebra structure on $Omega^*(M)$, i.e. that everything fits well with the differential. I think that you will need the property of being a submersion in that. Try to proceed with what I wrote, if you can't, I will work out a solution and put it here.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I didn't realise that you put problem 10.5a, sorry. I do indeed agree that this suffices provided that you know that $pi^*$ is a morphism of algebras not only of vector spaces. If you know that already, you should be fine proving problem 10.5a.
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 4 at 10:49







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            That’s what I meant, yes
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 5 at 5:26






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @SeleneAuckland If this answered your question, please consider accepting the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 6 at 7:44






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thanks! Wait, I just realized a potential flaw. $pi$ is not necessarily a linear map right?
            $endgroup$
            – Selene Auckland
            Mar 7 at 9:35







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Selene: You are correct that $pi$ is not necessarily linear. In fact,$tildeM$ and $M$ need not be vector spaces, so "linearity" is meaningless! On the other hand, saying $pi$ is a submersion means that $pi_ast: T_p tildeMrightarrow T_pi(p) M$ is a surjective linear map. So, apply what James said, except using $pi_ast$ instead of $pi$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jason DeVito
            Mar 11 at 15:58










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3134509%2fdoes-injectivity-of-dual-imply-injectivity-of-pullback-by-a-surjective-submersio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          Problem 18.8 can be proven in the following way (where I hope to not miss anything important hiding under the surface; let me know if you find issues in the proof!).



          You should first note that the pullback map $pi^*$ is the dual map to the map $pi$. Now, a general fact from linear algebra is that for any linear map $f$, $$ftext injective Longleftrightarrow f^*text surjective,\ ftext surjective Longleftrightarrow f^*text injective. $$ So in your case, if $pi$ is surjective, $pi^*$ is an injective homomorphism of vector spaces and you are left showing that it respects the algebra structure on $Omega^*(M)$, i.e. that everything fits well with the differential. I think that you will need the property of being a submersion in that. Try to proceed with what I wrote, if you can't, I will work out a solution and put it here.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I didn't realise that you put problem 10.5a, sorry. I do indeed agree that this suffices provided that you know that $pi^*$ is a morphism of algebras not only of vector spaces. If you know that already, you should be fine proving problem 10.5a.
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 4 at 10:49







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            That’s what I meant, yes
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 5 at 5:26






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @SeleneAuckland If this answered your question, please consider accepting the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 6 at 7:44






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thanks! Wait, I just realized a potential flaw. $pi$ is not necessarily a linear map right?
            $endgroup$
            – Selene Auckland
            Mar 7 at 9:35







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Selene: You are correct that $pi$ is not necessarily linear. In fact,$tildeM$ and $M$ need not be vector spaces, so "linearity" is meaningless! On the other hand, saying $pi$ is a submersion means that $pi_ast: T_p tildeMrightarrow T_pi(p) M$ is a surjective linear map. So, apply what James said, except using $pi_ast$ instead of $pi$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jason DeVito
            Mar 11 at 15:58















          2












          $begingroup$

          Problem 18.8 can be proven in the following way (where I hope to not miss anything important hiding under the surface; let me know if you find issues in the proof!).



          You should first note that the pullback map $pi^*$ is the dual map to the map $pi$. Now, a general fact from linear algebra is that for any linear map $f$, $$ftext injective Longleftrightarrow f^*text surjective,\ ftext surjective Longleftrightarrow f^*text injective. $$ So in your case, if $pi$ is surjective, $pi^*$ is an injective homomorphism of vector spaces and you are left showing that it respects the algebra structure on $Omega^*(M)$, i.e. that everything fits well with the differential. I think that you will need the property of being a submersion in that. Try to proceed with what I wrote, if you can't, I will work out a solution and put it here.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I didn't realise that you put problem 10.5a, sorry. I do indeed agree that this suffices provided that you know that $pi^*$ is a morphism of algebras not only of vector spaces. If you know that already, you should be fine proving problem 10.5a.
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 4 at 10:49







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            That’s what I meant, yes
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 5 at 5:26






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @SeleneAuckland If this answered your question, please consider accepting the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 6 at 7:44






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thanks! Wait, I just realized a potential flaw. $pi$ is not necessarily a linear map right?
            $endgroup$
            – Selene Auckland
            Mar 7 at 9:35







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Selene: You are correct that $pi$ is not necessarily linear. In fact,$tildeM$ and $M$ need not be vector spaces, so "linearity" is meaningless! On the other hand, saying $pi$ is a submersion means that $pi_ast: T_p tildeMrightarrow T_pi(p) M$ is a surjective linear map. So, apply what James said, except using $pi_ast$ instead of $pi$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jason DeVito
            Mar 11 at 15:58













          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Problem 18.8 can be proven in the following way (where I hope to not miss anything important hiding under the surface; let me know if you find issues in the proof!).



          You should first note that the pullback map $pi^*$ is the dual map to the map $pi$. Now, a general fact from linear algebra is that for any linear map $f$, $$ftext injective Longleftrightarrow f^*text surjective,\ ftext surjective Longleftrightarrow f^*text injective. $$ So in your case, if $pi$ is surjective, $pi^*$ is an injective homomorphism of vector spaces and you are left showing that it respects the algebra structure on $Omega^*(M)$, i.e. that everything fits well with the differential. I think that you will need the property of being a submersion in that. Try to proceed with what I wrote, if you can't, I will work out a solution and put it here.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Problem 18.8 can be proven in the following way (where I hope to not miss anything important hiding under the surface; let me know if you find issues in the proof!).



          You should first note that the pullback map $pi^*$ is the dual map to the map $pi$. Now, a general fact from linear algebra is that for any linear map $f$, $$ftext injective Longleftrightarrow f^*text surjective,\ ftext surjective Longleftrightarrow f^*text injective. $$ So in your case, if $pi$ is surjective, $pi^*$ is an injective homomorphism of vector spaces and you are left showing that it respects the algebra structure on $Omega^*(M)$, i.e. that everything fits well with the differential. I think that you will need the property of being a submersion in that. Try to proceed with what I wrote, if you can't, I will work out a solution and put it here.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 4 at 9:03









          JamesJames

          1




          1







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I didn't realise that you put problem 10.5a, sorry. I do indeed agree that this suffices provided that you know that $pi^*$ is a morphism of algebras not only of vector spaces. If you know that already, you should be fine proving problem 10.5a.
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 4 at 10:49







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            That’s what I meant, yes
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 5 at 5:26






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @SeleneAuckland If this answered your question, please consider accepting the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 6 at 7:44






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thanks! Wait, I just realized a potential flaw. $pi$ is not necessarily a linear map right?
            $endgroup$
            – Selene Auckland
            Mar 7 at 9:35







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Selene: You are correct that $pi$ is not necessarily linear. In fact,$tildeM$ and $M$ need not be vector spaces, so "linearity" is meaningless! On the other hand, saying $pi$ is a submersion means that $pi_ast: T_p tildeMrightarrow T_pi(p) M$ is a surjective linear map. So, apply what James said, except using $pi_ast$ instead of $pi$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jason DeVito
            Mar 11 at 15:58












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I didn't realise that you put problem 10.5a, sorry. I do indeed agree that this suffices provided that you know that $pi^*$ is a morphism of algebras not only of vector spaces. If you know that already, you should be fine proving problem 10.5a.
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 4 at 10:49







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            That’s what I meant, yes
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 5 at 5:26






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @SeleneAuckland If this answered your question, please consider accepting the answer.
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 6 at 7:44






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thanks! Wait, I just realized a potential flaw. $pi$ is not necessarily a linear map right?
            $endgroup$
            – Selene Auckland
            Mar 7 at 9:35







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Selene: You are correct that $pi$ is not necessarily linear. In fact,$tildeM$ and $M$ need not be vector spaces, so "linearity" is meaningless! On the other hand, saying $pi$ is a submersion means that $pi_ast: T_p tildeMrightarrow T_pi(p) M$ is a surjective linear map. So, apply what James said, except using $pi_ast$ instead of $pi$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jason DeVito
            Mar 11 at 15:58







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          I didn't realise that you put problem 10.5a, sorry. I do indeed agree that this suffices provided that you know that $pi^*$ is a morphism of algebras not only of vector spaces. If you know that already, you should be fine proving problem 10.5a.
          $endgroup$
          – James
          Mar 4 at 10:49





          $begingroup$
          I didn't realise that you put problem 10.5a, sorry. I do indeed agree that this suffices provided that you know that $pi^*$ is a morphism of algebras not only of vector spaces. If you know that already, you should be fine proving problem 10.5a.
          $endgroup$
          – James
          Mar 4 at 10:49





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          That’s what I meant, yes
          $endgroup$
          – James
          Mar 5 at 5:26




          $begingroup$
          That’s what I meant, yes
          $endgroup$
          – James
          Mar 5 at 5:26




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @SeleneAuckland If this answered your question, please consider accepting the answer.
          $endgroup$
          – James
          Mar 6 at 7:44




          $begingroup$
          @SeleneAuckland If this answered your question, please consider accepting the answer.
          $endgroup$
          – James
          Mar 6 at 7:44




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Thanks! Wait, I just realized a potential flaw. $pi$ is not necessarily a linear map right?
          $endgroup$
          – Selene Auckland
          Mar 7 at 9:35





          $begingroup$
          Thanks! Wait, I just realized a potential flaw. $pi$ is not necessarily a linear map right?
          $endgroup$
          – Selene Auckland
          Mar 7 at 9:35





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @Selene: You are correct that $pi$ is not necessarily linear. In fact,$tildeM$ and $M$ need not be vector spaces, so "linearity" is meaningless! On the other hand, saying $pi$ is a submersion means that $pi_ast: T_p tildeMrightarrow T_pi(p) M$ is a surjective linear map. So, apply what James said, except using $pi_ast$ instead of $pi$.
          $endgroup$
          – Jason DeVito
          Mar 11 at 15:58




          $begingroup$
          @Selene: You are correct that $pi$ is not necessarily linear. In fact,$tildeM$ and $M$ need not be vector spaces, so "linearity" is meaningless! On the other hand, saying $pi$ is a submersion means that $pi_ast: T_p tildeMrightarrow T_pi(p) M$ is a surjective linear map. So, apply what James said, except using $pi_ast$ instead of $pi$.
          $endgroup$
          – Jason DeVito
          Mar 11 at 15:58

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3134509%2fdoes-injectivity-of-dual-imply-injectivity-of-pullback-by-a-surjective-submersio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye