How to compute if a multivector inverse exists in Clifford Algebra The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCalculating the inverse of a multivectorInverse of a general nonfactorizable multivectorHow do I evaluate the Clifford product in dimensions greater than 3?Clifford Algebra Multiplication IntuitionInverse of a general nonfactorizable multivectorFinding an element in a Clifford algebra that satisfy some specific commutation and anti-commutation relationGeneralizing the dot product to multivectorsWhat happens to Clifford algebra structure and periodicity when the field is weird?Is the reverse really an anti-automorphism of a a Clifford algebra?Transformation of metric tensor under clifford algebra?How to perform wedge productOn the algebraic formulation of the Clifford algebra

Reference request: Grassmannian and Plucker coordinates in type B, C, D

Necessary condition on homology group for a set to be contractible

Do I need to write [sic] when a number is less than 10 but isn't written out?

How to write a definition with variants?

Flying from Cape Town to England and return to another province

Is it possible to use a NPN BJT as switch, from single power source?

Are police here, aren't itthey?

Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?

Which one is the true statement?

Dominated convergence theorem - what sequence?

Why specifically branches as firewood on the Altar?

How to edit “Name” property in GCI output?

Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

Can we say or write : "No, it'sn't"?

Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?

0-rank tensor vs vector in 1D

Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?

If the heap is zero-initialized for security, then why is the stack merely uninitialized?

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"

Do they change the text of the seder in Israel?

Why do airplanes bank sharply to the right after air-to-air refueling?

Yu-Gi-Oh cards in Python 3



How to compute if a multivector inverse exists in Clifford Algebra



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCalculating the inverse of a multivectorInverse of a general nonfactorizable multivectorHow do I evaluate the Clifford product in dimensions greater than 3?Clifford Algebra Multiplication IntuitionInverse of a general nonfactorizable multivectorFinding an element in a Clifford algebra that satisfy some specific commutation and anti-commutation relationGeneralizing the dot product to multivectorsWhat happens to Clifford algebra structure and periodicity when the field is weird?Is the reverse really an anti-automorphism of a a Clifford algebra?Transformation of metric tensor under clifford algebra?How to perform wedge productOn the algebraic formulation of the Clifford algebra










1












$begingroup$


Suppose we have a 4 dimension positive signature clifford algebra. In Calculating the inverse of a multivector and Inverse of a general nonfactorizable multivector, the inverse of a multivector is presented as a solution when vectors/bivectors are present



$B^-1 = fracB^daggerB B^dagger$



but the above is not true for any multivector. For example, how to know if



$(1+e_1234)^-1$



exists and how to compute it?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    Suppose we have a 4 dimension positive signature clifford algebra. In Calculating the inverse of a multivector and Inverse of a general nonfactorizable multivector, the inverse of a multivector is presented as a solution when vectors/bivectors are present



    $B^-1 = fracB^daggerB B^dagger$



    but the above is not true for any multivector. For example, how to know if



    $(1+e_1234)^-1$



    exists and how to compute it?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Suppose we have a 4 dimension positive signature clifford algebra. In Calculating the inverse of a multivector and Inverse of a general nonfactorizable multivector, the inverse of a multivector is presented as a solution when vectors/bivectors are present



      $B^-1 = fracB^daggerB B^dagger$



      but the above is not true for any multivector. For example, how to know if



      $(1+e_1234)^-1$



      exists and how to compute it?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Suppose we have a 4 dimension positive signature clifford algebra. In Calculating the inverse of a multivector and Inverse of a general nonfactorizable multivector, the inverse of a multivector is presented as a solution when vectors/bivectors are present



      $B^-1 = fracB^daggerB B^dagger$



      but the above is not true for any multivector. For example, how to know if



      $(1+e_1234)^-1$



      exists and how to compute it?







      clifford-algebras geometric-algebras






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 19 at 13:10









      paco gilpaco gil

      82




      82




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Naively speaking, the existence of inverses will depend on the signature $(p,q)$ of the quadratic space $mathbbR^p,q=(mathbbR^p+q,g)$, in which for an orthonormal basis $e_i_i=1^n=p+q$ and $v=sum v^ie_i$ we have
          $$g(v,v)=(v^1)^2+(v^2)^2+cdots+(v^p)^2-(v^p+1)^2-cdots-(v^p+q)^2.$$



          For your example, notice that if $(e_1234)^2=-1$, then
          $$(1+e_1234)frac12(1-e_1234)=1,$$
          which means that $(1+e_1234)^-1=frac12(1-e_1234)$.



          Now, if $(e_1234)^2=1$, then there is no inverse for $(1+e_1234)$, which is due to the fact that $xoverlinex=0$. More specifically, one can derive conditions for which there are inverses for the cases where $p+q=nleq 5$. The discovery of new faster methods for higher dimensions, which do not depend on the signature is a problem still under development as of today. As an example, we could cite this.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154032%2fhow-to-compute-if-a-multivector-inverse-exists-in-clifford-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Naively speaking, the existence of inverses will depend on the signature $(p,q)$ of the quadratic space $mathbbR^p,q=(mathbbR^p+q,g)$, in which for an orthonormal basis $e_i_i=1^n=p+q$ and $v=sum v^ie_i$ we have
            $$g(v,v)=(v^1)^2+(v^2)^2+cdots+(v^p)^2-(v^p+1)^2-cdots-(v^p+q)^2.$$



            For your example, notice that if $(e_1234)^2=-1$, then
            $$(1+e_1234)frac12(1-e_1234)=1,$$
            which means that $(1+e_1234)^-1=frac12(1-e_1234)$.



            Now, if $(e_1234)^2=1$, then there is no inverse for $(1+e_1234)$, which is due to the fact that $xoverlinex=0$. More specifically, one can derive conditions for which there are inverses for the cases where $p+q=nleq 5$. The discovery of new faster methods for higher dimensions, which do not depend on the signature is a problem still under development as of today. As an example, we could cite this.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              Naively speaking, the existence of inverses will depend on the signature $(p,q)$ of the quadratic space $mathbbR^p,q=(mathbbR^p+q,g)$, in which for an orthonormal basis $e_i_i=1^n=p+q$ and $v=sum v^ie_i$ we have
              $$g(v,v)=(v^1)^2+(v^2)^2+cdots+(v^p)^2-(v^p+1)^2-cdots-(v^p+q)^2.$$



              For your example, notice that if $(e_1234)^2=-1$, then
              $$(1+e_1234)frac12(1-e_1234)=1,$$
              which means that $(1+e_1234)^-1=frac12(1-e_1234)$.



              Now, if $(e_1234)^2=1$, then there is no inverse for $(1+e_1234)$, which is due to the fact that $xoverlinex=0$. More specifically, one can derive conditions for which there are inverses for the cases where $p+q=nleq 5$. The discovery of new faster methods for higher dimensions, which do not depend on the signature is a problem still under development as of today. As an example, we could cite this.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Naively speaking, the existence of inverses will depend on the signature $(p,q)$ of the quadratic space $mathbbR^p,q=(mathbbR^p+q,g)$, in which for an orthonormal basis $e_i_i=1^n=p+q$ and $v=sum v^ie_i$ we have
                $$g(v,v)=(v^1)^2+(v^2)^2+cdots+(v^p)^2-(v^p+1)^2-cdots-(v^p+q)^2.$$



                For your example, notice that if $(e_1234)^2=-1$, then
                $$(1+e_1234)frac12(1-e_1234)=1,$$
                which means that $(1+e_1234)^-1=frac12(1-e_1234)$.



                Now, if $(e_1234)^2=1$, then there is no inverse for $(1+e_1234)$, which is due to the fact that $xoverlinex=0$. More specifically, one can derive conditions for which there are inverses for the cases where $p+q=nleq 5$. The discovery of new faster methods for higher dimensions, which do not depend on the signature is a problem still under development as of today. As an example, we could cite this.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Naively speaking, the existence of inverses will depend on the signature $(p,q)$ of the quadratic space $mathbbR^p,q=(mathbbR^p+q,g)$, in which for an orthonormal basis $e_i_i=1^n=p+q$ and $v=sum v^ie_i$ we have
                $$g(v,v)=(v^1)^2+(v^2)^2+cdots+(v^p)^2-(v^p+1)^2-cdots-(v^p+q)^2.$$



                For your example, notice that if $(e_1234)^2=-1$, then
                $$(1+e_1234)frac12(1-e_1234)=1,$$
                which means that $(1+e_1234)^-1=frac12(1-e_1234)$.



                Now, if $(e_1234)^2=1$, then there is no inverse for $(1+e_1234)$, which is due to the fact that $xoverlinex=0$. More specifically, one can derive conditions for which there are inverses for the cases where $p+q=nleq 5$. The discovery of new faster methods for higher dimensions, which do not depend on the signature is a problem still under development as of today. As an example, we could cite this.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Mar 20 at 17:39

























                answered Mar 20 at 16:33









                Aquerman KuczmendaAquerman Kuczmenda

                1065




                1065



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154032%2fhow-to-compute-if-a-multivector-inverse-exists-in-clifford-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye