A question on the proof of Rigidity Lemma in birational geometry The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat are normal schemes intuitively?dimension of image of proper closed set under a morphism.Ensuring I have a closed pointintersection dimension theorem for any smooth varietyProof of rigidity lemmaStandard proof that the set of sigularities is closedDimension of Fibers of a Morphism “Proof” Contradicts Later TheoremSome problems related to unirational varietiesWhy is the composition of Hartshorne-smooth morphisms H-smooth? - a question on irreducible componentsHartshorne II-3.22(b)

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?

Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?

Is wanting to ask what to write an indication that you need to change your story?

Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?

Running a General Election and the European Elections together

Do I need to write [sic] when a number is less than 10 but isn't written out?

Calculator final project in Python

A Man With a Stainless Steel Endoskeleton (like The Terminator) Fighting Cloaked Aliens Only He Can See

0-rank tensor vs vector in 1D

Is it possible to use a NPN BJT as switch, from single power source?

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

The exact meaning of 'Mom made me a sandwich'

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

The past simple of "gaslight" – "gaslighted" or "gaslit"?

Does increasing your ability score affect your main stat?

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

How many extra stops do monopods offer for tele photographs?

Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?

How to invert MapIndexed on a ragged structure? How to construct a tree from rules?

Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)

How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?

Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis



A question on the proof of Rigidity Lemma in birational geometry



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat are normal schemes intuitively?dimension of image of proper closed set under a morphism.Ensuring I have a closed pointintersection dimension theorem for any smooth varietyProof of rigidity lemmaStandard proof that the set of sigularities is closedDimension of Fibers of a Morphism “Proof” Contradicts Later TheoremSome problems related to unirational varietiesWhy is the composition of Hartshorne-smooth morphisms H-smooth? - a question on irreducible componentsHartshorne II-3.22(b)










2












$begingroup$


I am reading the book, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, by J$acutemathrm a$nos Koll$acutemathrm a$r et al..




(Rigidity Lemma) Let $Y$ be an irreducible variety and $f:Yto Z$ a proper surjective morphism. Assume that every fiber of $f$ is connected and of dimension $n$. Let $g:Yto X$ be a morphism such that $g(f^-1(z_0))$ is a point for some $z_0in Z$. Then $g(f^-1(z))$ is a point for any $zin Z$.



Proof. Set $W=im(ftimes g)subset Ztimes X$. We obtain proper morphisms $f:Yto Wto Z$, where $h:Yto W$ and $p:Wto Z$. $p^-1(z)=h(f^-1(z))$ and $dim p^-1(z_0)=0$. By the upper semi-continuity of fiber dimensions, there is an open subset $z_0in Usubset Z$ such that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$. Thus $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ over $p^-1(U)$, hence $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. For any $win W$, $h^-1(w)subset f^-1(p(w))$, $dim h^-1(w)geqslant n$ and $dim f^-1(p(w))=n$. Therefore $h^-1(w)$ is a union of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$, and so $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is finite. It is a single point since $f^-1(p(w))$ is connected. Q.E.D.




I have no idea on the claim that $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is a finite set. Maybe I should use the density of $p^-1(U)$ in $W$ ?



My try:



If $p^-1(p(w))$ is infinite, since $p^-1(U)$ is dense in $W$, one has $p^-1(p(w))cap p^-1(U)neqemptyset$, equivalently , $p(w)cap Uneqemptyset$. Hence there exists some $zin U$ such that $p(w)=z$. Note that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$, impossible (since $w$ is arbitrary).



So could anyone give me some hints? Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    I am reading the book, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, by J$acutemathrm a$nos Koll$acutemathrm a$r et al..




    (Rigidity Lemma) Let $Y$ be an irreducible variety and $f:Yto Z$ a proper surjective morphism. Assume that every fiber of $f$ is connected and of dimension $n$. Let $g:Yto X$ be a morphism such that $g(f^-1(z_0))$ is a point for some $z_0in Z$. Then $g(f^-1(z))$ is a point for any $zin Z$.



    Proof. Set $W=im(ftimes g)subset Ztimes X$. We obtain proper morphisms $f:Yto Wto Z$, where $h:Yto W$ and $p:Wto Z$. $p^-1(z)=h(f^-1(z))$ and $dim p^-1(z_0)=0$. By the upper semi-continuity of fiber dimensions, there is an open subset $z_0in Usubset Z$ such that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$. Thus $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ over $p^-1(U)$, hence $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. For any $win W$, $h^-1(w)subset f^-1(p(w))$, $dim h^-1(w)geqslant n$ and $dim f^-1(p(w))=n$. Therefore $h^-1(w)$ is a union of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$, and so $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is finite. It is a single point since $f^-1(p(w))$ is connected. Q.E.D.




    I have no idea on the claim that $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is a finite set. Maybe I should use the density of $p^-1(U)$ in $W$ ?



    My try:



    If $p^-1(p(w))$ is infinite, since $p^-1(U)$ is dense in $W$, one has $p^-1(p(w))cap p^-1(U)neqemptyset$, equivalently , $p(w)cap Uneqemptyset$. Hence there exists some $zin U$ such that $p(w)=z$. Note that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$, impossible (since $w$ is arbitrary).



    So could anyone give me some hints? Thanks!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I am reading the book, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, by J$acutemathrm a$nos Koll$acutemathrm a$r et al..




      (Rigidity Lemma) Let $Y$ be an irreducible variety and $f:Yto Z$ a proper surjective morphism. Assume that every fiber of $f$ is connected and of dimension $n$. Let $g:Yto X$ be a morphism such that $g(f^-1(z_0))$ is a point for some $z_0in Z$. Then $g(f^-1(z))$ is a point for any $zin Z$.



      Proof. Set $W=im(ftimes g)subset Ztimes X$. We obtain proper morphisms $f:Yto Wto Z$, where $h:Yto W$ and $p:Wto Z$. $p^-1(z)=h(f^-1(z))$ and $dim p^-1(z_0)=0$. By the upper semi-continuity of fiber dimensions, there is an open subset $z_0in Usubset Z$ such that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$. Thus $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ over $p^-1(U)$, hence $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. For any $win W$, $h^-1(w)subset f^-1(p(w))$, $dim h^-1(w)geqslant n$ and $dim f^-1(p(w))=n$. Therefore $h^-1(w)$ is a union of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$, and so $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is finite. It is a single point since $f^-1(p(w))$ is connected. Q.E.D.




      I have no idea on the claim that $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is a finite set. Maybe I should use the density of $p^-1(U)$ in $W$ ?



      My try:



      If $p^-1(p(w))$ is infinite, since $p^-1(U)$ is dense in $W$, one has $p^-1(p(w))cap p^-1(U)neqemptyset$, equivalently , $p(w)cap Uneqemptyset$. Hence there exists some $zin U$ such that $p(w)=z$. Note that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$, impossible (since $w$ is arbitrary).



      So could anyone give me some hints? Thanks!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am reading the book, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, by J$acutemathrm a$nos Koll$acutemathrm a$r et al..




      (Rigidity Lemma) Let $Y$ be an irreducible variety and $f:Yto Z$ a proper surjective morphism. Assume that every fiber of $f$ is connected and of dimension $n$. Let $g:Yto X$ be a morphism such that $g(f^-1(z_0))$ is a point for some $z_0in Z$. Then $g(f^-1(z))$ is a point for any $zin Z$.



      Proof. Set $W=im(ftimes g)subset Ztimes X$. We obtain proper morphisms $f:Yto Wto Z$, where $h:Yto W$ and $p:Wto Z$. $p^-1(z)=h(f^-1(z))$ and $dim p^-1(z_0)=0$. By the upper semi-continuity of fiber dimensions, there is an open subset $z_0in Usubset Z$ such that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$. Thus $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ over $p^-1(U)$, hence $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. For any $win W$, $h^-1(w)subset f^-1(p(w))$, $dim h^-1(w)geqslant n$ and $dim f^-1(p(w))=n$. Therefore $h^-1(w)$ is a union of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$, and so $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is finite. It is a single point since $f^-1(p(w))$ is connected. Q.E.D.




      I have no idea on the claim that $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is a finite set. Maybe I should use the density of $p^-1(U)$ in $W$ ?



      My try:



      If $p^-1(p(w))$ is infinite, since $p^-1(U)$ is dense in $W$, one has $p^-1(p(w))cap p^-1(U)neqemptyset$, equivalently , $p(w)cap Uneqemptyset$. Hence there exists some $zin U$ such that $p(w)=z$. Note that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$, impossible (since $w$ is arbitrary).



      So could anyone give me some hints? Thanks!







      algebraic-geometry schemes birational-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 19 at 17:45









      Stefano

      2,223931




      2,223931










      asked Mar 19 at 13:15









      Jiabin DuJiabin Du

      301111




      301111




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I will assume that you are fine with the fact that $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. Then, set theoretically, we can check $h^-1(w) subset f^-1(p(w))$ for any $w in W$. By assumption, $f$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere; thus, by the inclusion, we deduce that $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere. Now, as $f$ is proper, then so is $h$. Therefore, $h^-1(w)$ is a proper subvariety of $f^-1(p(w))$ of the same dimension. It follows that it is the union of some of the irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$.



          Now, notice that $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$. Then, $p^-1(p(w))$ has dimension 0. Indeed, if it had bigger dimension, $f^-1(p(w))$ would have dimension at least $n+1$, as $h$ has fiber dimension $n$. Since $f$ is a proper morphism, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a proper variety over the residue field of the point $p(w)$. In particular, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a variety of finite type. This implies that it has finitely many irreducible components.



          Now, we know that $p^-1(p(w))$ is a collection of points. Since $h$ is proper and has fiber dimension $n$, for every point $w_i$ in $p^-1(p(w))$, the fiber $h^-1(w_i)$ provides a positive finite number of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$ (they are finite since $h$ is proper, we have at least 1 since we are working in the image of the morphism, but they may be more). Thus, since $f^-1(p(w))$ has finitely many irreducible components, $p^-1(p(w))$ needs to be finite.



          From the identity $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$, then follows the identity $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Dear Stefano, thank you! Actually, I don't understand that "Since $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, it follows that $p^-1(p(w))$ is finite" . My question is : (a) By a set $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, you mean it is a proper as a variety over a field $k$? (b) Why is $p^-1(p(w))$ finite? Could you explain these more precisely?
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @JiabinDu I updated the answer to address your questions.
            $endgroup$
            – Stefano
            Mar 20 at 3:27










          • $begingroup$
            Got it. You're right. Thanks again!
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 4:00












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154038%2fa-question-on-the-proof-of-rigidity-lemma-in-birational-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          I will assume that you are fine with the fact that $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. Then, set theoretically, we can check $h^-1(w) subset f^-1(p(w))$ for any $w in W$. By assumption, $f$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere; thus, by the inclusion, we deduce that $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere. Now, as $f$ is proper, then so is $h$. Therefore, $h^-1(w)$ is a proper subvariety of $f^-1(p(w))$ of the same dimension. It follows that it is the union of some of the irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$.



          Now, notice that $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$. Then, $p^-1(p(w))$ has dimension 0. Indeed, if it had bigger dimension, $f^-1(p(w))$ would have dimension at least $n+1$, as $h$ has fiber dimension $n$. Since $f$ is a proper morphism, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a proper variety over the residue field of the point $p(w)$. In particular, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a variety of finite type. This implies that it has finitely many irreducible components.



          Now, we know that $p^-1(p(w))$ is a collection of points. Since $h$ is proper and has fiber dimension $n$, for every point $w_i$ in $p^-1(p(w))$, the fiber $h^-1(w_i)$ provides a positive finite number of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$ (they are finite since $h$ is proper, we have at least 1 since we are working in the image of the morphism, but they may be more). Thus, since $f^-1(p(w))$ has finitely many irreducible components, $p^-1(p(w))$ needs to be finite.



          From the identity $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$, then follows the identity $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Dear Stefano, thank you! Actually, I don't understand that "Since $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, it follows that $p^-1(p(w))$ is finite" . My question is : (a) By a set $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, you mean it is a proper as a variety over a field $k$? (b) Why is $p^-1(p(w))$ finite? Could you explain these more precisely?
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @JiabinDu I updated the answer to address your questions.
            $endgroup$
            – Stefano
            Mar 20 at 3:27










          • $begingroup$
            Got it. You're right. Thanks again!
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 4:00
















          1












          $begingroup$

          I will assume that you are fine with the fact that $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. Then, set theoretically, we can check $h^-1(w) subset f^-1(p(w))$ for any $w in W$. By assumption, $f$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere; thus, by the inclusion, we deduce that $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere. Now, as $f$ is proper, then so is $h$. Therefore, $h^-1(w)$ is a proper subvariety of $f^-1(p(w))$ of the same dimension. It follows that it is the union of some of the irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$.



          Now, notice that $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$. Then, $p^-1(p(w))$ has dimension 0. Indeed, if it had bigger dimension, $f^-1(p(w))$ would have dimension at least $n+1$, as $h$ has fiber dimension $n$. Since $f$ is a proper morphism, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a proper variety over the residue field of the point $p(w)$. In particular, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a variety of finite type. This implies that it has finitely many irreducible components.



          Now, we know that $p^-1(p(w))$ is a collection of points. Since $h$ is proper and has fiber dimension $n$, for every point $w_i$ in $p^-1(p(w))$, the fiber $h^-1(w_i)$ provides a positive finite number of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$ (they are finite since $h$ is proper, we have at least 1 since we are working in the image of the morphism, but they may be more). Thus, since $f^-1(p(w))$ has finitely many irreducible components, $p^-1(p(w))$ needs to be finite.



          From the identity $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$, then follows the identity $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Dear Stefano, thank you! Actually, I don't understand that "Since $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, it follows that $p^-1(p(w))$ is finite" . My question is : (a) By a set $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, you mean it is a proper as a variety over a field $k$? (b) Why is $p^-1(p(w))$ finite? Could you explain these more precisely?
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @JiabinDu I updated the answer to address your questions.
            $endgroup$
            – Stefano
            Mar 20 at 3:27










          • $begingroup$
            Got it. You're right. Thanks again!
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 4:00














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          I will assume that you are fine with the fact that $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. Then, set theoretically, we can check $h^-1(w) subset f^-1(p(w))$ for any $w in W$. By assumption, $f$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere; thus, by the inclusion, we deduce that $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere. Now, as $f$ is proper, then so is $h$. Therefore, $h^-1(w)$ is a proper subvariety of $f^-1(p(w))$ of the same dimension. It follows that it is the union of some of the irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$.



          Now, notice that $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$. Then, $p^-1(p(w))$ has dimension 0. Indeed, if it had bigger dimension, $f^-1(p(w))$ would have dimension at least $n+1$, as $h$ has fiber dimension $n$. Since $f$ is a proper morphism, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a proper variety over the residue field of the point $p(w)$. In particular, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a variety of finite type. This implies that it has finitely many irreducible components.



          Now, we know that $p^-1(p(w))$ is a collection of points. Since $h$ is proper and has fiber dimension $n$, for every point $w_i$ in $p^-1(p(w))$, the fiber $h^-1(w_i)$ provides a positive finite number of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$ (they are finite since $h$ is proper, we have at least 1 since we are working in the image of the morphism, but they may be more). Thus, since $f^-1(p(w))$ has finitely many irreducible components, $p^-1(p(w))$ needs to be finite.



          From the identity $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$, then follows the identity $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          I will assume that you are fine with the fact that $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. Then, set theoretically, we can check $h^-1(w) subset f^-1(p(w))$ for any $w in W$. By assumption, $f$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere; thus, by the inclusion, we deduce that $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere. Now, as $f$ is proper, then so is $h$. Therefore, $h^-1(w)$ is a proper subvariety of $f^-1(p(w))$ of the same dimension. It follows that it is the union of some of the irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$.



          Now, notice that $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$. Then, $p^-1(p(w))$ has dimension 0. Indeed, if it had bigger dimension, $f^-1(p(w))$ would have dimension at least $n+1$, as $h$ has fiber dimension $n$. Since $f$ is a proper morphism, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a proper variety over the residue field of the point $p(w)$. In particular, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a variety of finite type. This implies that it has finitely many irreducible components.



          Now, we know that $p^-1(p(w))$ is a collection of points. Since $h$ is proper and has fiber dimension $n$, for every point $w_i$ in $p^-1(p(w))$, the fiber $h^-1(w_i)$ provides a positive finite number of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$ (they are finite since $h$ is proper, we have at least 1 since we are working in the image of the morphism, but they may be more). Thus, since $f^-1(p(w))$ has finitely many irreducible components, $p^-1(p(w))$ needs to be finite.



          From the identity $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$, then follows the identity $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 20 at 3:27

























          answered Mar 19 at 17:15









          StefanoStefano

          2,223931




          2,223931











          • $begingroup$
            Dear Stefano, thank you! Actually, I don't understand that "Since $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, it follows that $p^-1(p(w))$ is finite" . My question is : (a) By a set $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, you mean it is a proper as a variety over a field $k$? (b) Why is $p^-1(p(w))$ finite? Could you explain these more precisely?
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @JiabinDu I updated the answer to address your questions.
            $endgroup$
            – Stefano
            Mar 20 at 3:27










          • $begingroup$
            Got it. You're right. Thanks again!
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 4:00

















          • $begingroup$
            Dear Stefano, thank you! Actually, I don't understand that "Since $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, it follows that $p^-1(p(w))$ is finite" . My question is : (a) By a set $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, you mean it is a proper as a variety over a field $k$? (b) Why is $p^-1(p(w))$ finite? Could you explain these more precisely?
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @JiabinDu I updated the answer to address your questions.
            $endgroup$
            – Stefano
            Mar 20 at 3:27










          • $begingroup$
            Got it. You're right. Thanks again!
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 4:00
















          $begingroup$
          Dear Stefano, thank you! Actually, I don't understand that "Since $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, it follows that $p^-1(p(w))$ is finite" . My question is : (a) By a set $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, you mean it is a proper as a variety over a field $k$? (b) Why is $p^-1(p(w))$ finite? Could you explain these more precisely?
          $endgroup$
          – Jiabin Du
          Mar 20 at 0:28




          $begingroup$
          Dear Stefano, thank you! Actually, I don't understand that "Since $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, it follows that $p^-1(p(w))$ is finite" . My question is : (a) By a set $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, you mean it is a proper as a variety over a field $k$? (b) Why is $p^-1(p(w))$ finite? Could you explain these more precisely?
          $endgroup$
          – Jiabin Du
          Mar 20 at 0:28












          $begingroup$
          @JiabinDu I updated the answer to address your questions.
          $endgroup$
          – Stefano
          Mar 20 at 3:27




          $begingroup$
          @JiabinDu I updated the answer to address your questions.
          $endgroup$
          – Stefano
          Mar 20 at 3:27












          $begingroup$
          Got it. You're right. Thanks again!
          $endgroup$
          – Jiabin Du
          Mar 20 at 4:00





          $begingroup$
          Got it. You're right. Thanks again!
          $endgroup$
          – Jiabin Du
          Mar 20 at 4:00


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154038%2fa-question-on-the-proof-of-rigidity-lemma-in-birational-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          ZQhnrRXGjcxETchRiyT T2yAUVosArYbUr4V p U
          A,B NP H xc62f9pS LFBZ8s4U,iR9bV8FRKuNQsRTAw hCwH9QXaxUyPcAKm mQLz lP4dTOANma6UkU SVekXU3K2BR,d7t9

          Popular posts from this blog

          Football at the 1986 Brunei Merdeka Games Contents Teams Group stage Knockout stage References Navigation menu"Brunei Merdeka Games 1986".

          Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

          Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee