A question on the proof of Rigidity Lemma in birational geometry The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat are normal schemes intuitively?dimension of image of proper closed set under a morphism.Ensuring I have a closed pointintersection dimension theorem for any smooth varietyProof of rigidity lemmaStandard proof that the set of sigularities is closedDimension of Fibers of a Morphism “Proof” Contradicts Later TheoremSome problems related to unirational varietiesWhy is the composition of Hartshorne-smooth morphisms H-smooth? - a question on irreducible componentsHartshorne II-3.22(b)

Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?

Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?

Is wanting to ask what to write an indication that you need to change your story?

Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?

Running a General Election and the European Elections together

Do I need to write [sic] when a number is less than 10 but isn't written out?

Calculator final project in Python

A Man With a Stainless Steel Endoskeleton (like The Terminator) Fighting Cloaked Aliens Only He Can See

0-rank tensor vs vector in 1D

Is it possible to use a NPN BJT as switch, from single power source?

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?

The exact meaning of 'Mom made me a sandwich'

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

The past simple of "gaslight" – "gaslighted" or "gaslit"?

Does increasing your ability score affect your main stat?

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

How many extra stops do monopods offer for tele photographs?

Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?

How to invert MapIndexed on a ragged structure? How to construct a tree from rules?

Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)

How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?

Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis



A question on the proof of Rigidity Lemma in birational geometry



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat are normal schemes intuitively?dimension of image of proper closed set under a morphism.Ensuring I have a closed pointintersection dimension theorem for any smooth varietyProof of rigidity lemmaStandard proof that the set of sigularities is closedDimension of Fibers of a Morphism “Proof” Contradicts Later TheoremSome problems related to unirational varietiesWhy is the composition of Hartshorne-smooth morphisms H-smooth? - a question on irreducible componentsHartshorne II-3.22(b)










2












$begingroup$


I am reading the book, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, by J$acutemathrm a$nos Koll$acutemathrm a$r et al..




(Rigidity Lemma) Let $Y$ be an irreducible variety and $f:Yto Z$ a proper surjective morphism. Assume that every fiber of $f$ is connected and of dimension $n$. Let $g:Yto X$ be a morphism such that $g(f^-1(z_0))$ is a point for some $z_0in Z$. Then $g(f^-1(z))$ is a point for any $zin Z$.



Proof. Set $W=im(ftimes g)subset Ztimes X$. We obtain proper morphisms $f:Yto Wto Z$, where $h:Yto W$ and $p:Wto Z$. $p^-1(z)=h(f^-1(z))$ and $dim p^-1(z_0)=0$. By the upper semi-continuity of fiber dimensions, there is an open subset $z_0in Usubset Z$ such that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$. Thus $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ over $p^-1(U)$, hence $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. For any $win W$, $h^-1(w)subset f^-1(p(w))$, $dim h^-1(w)geqslant n$ and $dim f^-1(p(w))=n$. Therefore $h^-1(w)$ is a union of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$, and so $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is finite. It is a single point since $f^-1(p(w))$ is connected. Q.E.D.




I have no idea on the claim that $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is a finite set. Maybe I should use the density of $p^-1(U)$ in $W$ ?



My try:



If $p^-1(p(w))$ is infinite, since $p^-1(U)$ is dense in $W$, one has $p^-1(p(w))cap p^-1(U)neqemptyset$, equivalently , $p(w)cap Uneqemptyset$. Hence there exists some $zin U$ such that $p(w)=z$. Note that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$, impossible (since $w$ is arbitrary).



So could anyone give me some hints? Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    I am reading the book, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, by J$acutemathrm a$nos Koll$acutemathrm a$r et al..




    (Rigidity Lemma) Let $Y$ be an irreducible variety and $f:Yto Z$ a proper surjective morphism. Assume that every fiber of $f$ is connected and of dimension $n$. Let $g:Yto X$ be a morphism such that $g(f^-1(z_0))$ is a point for some $z_0in Z$. Then $g(f^-1(z))$ is a point for any $zin Z$.



    Proof. Set $W=im(ftimes g)subset Ztimes X$. We obtain proper morphisms $f:Yto Wto Z$, where $h:Yto W$ and $p:Wto Z$. $p^-1(z)=h(f^-1(z))$ and $dim p^-1(z_0)=0$. By the upper semi-continuity of fiber dimensions, there is an open subset $z_0in Usubset Z$ such that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$. Thus $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ over $p^-1(U)$, hence $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. For any $win W$, $h^-1(w)subset f^-1(p(w))$, $dim h^-1(w)geqslant n$ and $dim f^-1(p(w))=n$. Therefore $h^-1(w)$ is a union of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$, and so $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is finite. It is a single point since $f^-1(p(w))$ is connected. Q.E.D.




    I have no idea on the claim that $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is a finite set. Maybe I should use the density of $p^-1(U)$ in $W$ ?



    My try:



    If $p^-1(p(w))$ is infinite, since $p^-1(U)$ is dense in $W$, one has $p^-1(p(w))cap p^-1(U)neqemptyset$, equivalently , $p(w)cap Uneqemptyset$. Hence there exists some $zin U$ such that $p(w)=z$. Note that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$, impossible (since $w$ is arbitrary).



    So could anyone give me some hints? Thanks!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I am reading the book, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, by J$acutemathrm a$nos Koll$acutemathrm a$r et al..




      (Rigidity Lemma) Let $Y$ be an irreducible variety and $f:Yto Z$ a proper surjective morphism. Assume that every fiber of $f$ is connected and of dimension $n$. Let $g:Yto X$ be a morphism such that $g(f^-1(z_0))$ is a point for some $z_0in Z$. Then $g(f^-1(z))$ is a point for any $zin Z$.



      Proof. Set $W=im(ftimes g)subset Ztimes X$. We obtain proper morphisms $f:Yto Wto Z$, where $h:Yto W$ and $p:Wto Z$. $p^-1(z)=h(f^-1(z))$ and $dim p^-1(z_0)=0$. By the upper semi-continuity of fiber dimensions, there is an open subset $z_0in Usubset Z$ such that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$. Thus $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ over $p^-1(U)$, hence $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. For any $win W$, $h^-1(w)subset f^-1(p(w))$, $dim h^-1(w)geqslant n$ and $dim f^-1(p(w))=n$. Therefore $h^-1(w)$ is a union of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$, and so $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is finite. It is a single point since $f^-1(p(w))$ is connected. Q.E.D.




      I have no idea on the claim that $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is a finite set. Maybe I should use the density of $p^-1(U)$ in $W$ ?



      My try:



      If $p^-1(p(w))$ is infinite, since $p^-1(U)$ is dense in $W$, one has $p^-1(p(w))cap p^-1(U)neqemptyset$, equivalently , $p(w)cap Uneqemptyset$. Hence there exists some $zin U$ such that $p(w)=z$. Note that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$, impossible (since $w$ is arbitrary).



      So could anyone give me some hints? Thanks!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am reading the book, Birational Geometry of Algebraic Varieties, by J$acutemathrm a$nos Koll$acutemathrm a$r et al..




      (Rigidity Lemma) Let $Y$ be an irreducible variety and $f:Yto Z$ a proper surjective morphism. Assume that every fiber of $f$ is connected and of dimension $n$. Let $g:Yto X$ be a morphism such that $g(f^-1(z_0))$ is a point for some $z_0in Z$. Then $g(f^-1(z))$ is a point for any $zin Z$.



      Proof. Set $W=im(ftimes g)subset Ztimes X$. We obtain proper morphisms $f:Yto Wto Z$, where $h:Yto W$ and $p:Wto Z$. $p^-1(z)=h(f^-1(z))$ and $dim p^-1(z_0)=0$. By the upper semi-continuity of fiber dimensions, there is an open subset $z_0in Usubset Z$ such that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$. Thus $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ over $p^-1(U)$, hence $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. For any $win W$, $h^-1(w)subset f^-1(p(w))$, $dim h^-1(w)geqslant n$ and $dim f^-1(p(w))=n$. Therefore $h^-1(w)$ is a union of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$, and so $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is finite. It is a single point since $f^-1(p(w))$ is connected. Q.E.D.




      I have no idea on the claim that $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$ is a finite set. Maybe I should use the density of $p^-1(U)$ in $W$ ?



      My try:



      If $p^-1(p(w))$ is infinite, since $p^-1(U)$ is dense in $W$, one has $p^-1(p(w))cap p^-1(U)neqemptyset$, equivalently , $p(w)cap Uneqemptyset$. Hence there exists some $zin U$ such that $p(w)=z$. Note that $dim p^-1(z)=0$ for any $zin U$, impossible (since $w$ is arbitrary).



      So could anyone give me some hints? Thanks!







      algebraic-geometry schemes birational-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 19 at 17:45









      Stefano

      2,223931




      2,223931










      asked Mar 19 at 13:15









      Jiabin DuJiabin Du

      301111




      301111




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I will assume that you are fine with the fact that $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. Then, set theoretically, we can check $h^-1(w) subset f^-1(p(w))$ for any $w in W$. By assumption, $f$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere; thus, by the inclusion, we deduce that $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere. Now, as $f$ is proper, then so is $h$. Therefore, $h^-1(w)$ is a proper subvariety of $f^-1(p(w))$ of the same dimension. It follows that it is the union of some of the irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$.



          Now, notice that $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$. Then, $p^-1(p(w))$ has dimension 0. Indeed, if it had bigger dimension, $f^-1(p(w))$ would have dimension at least $n+1$, as $h$ has fiber dimension $n$. Since $f$ is a proper morphism, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a proper variety over the residue field of the point $p(w)$. In particular, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a variety of finite type. This implies that it has finitely many irreducible components.



          Now, we know that $p^-1(p(w))$ is a collection of points. Since $h$ is proper and has fiber dimension $n$, for every point $w_i$ in $p^-1(p(w))$, the fiber $h^-1(w_i)$ provides a positive finite number of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$ (they are finite since $h$ is proper, we have at least 1 since we are working in the image of the morphism, but they may be more). Thus, since $f^-1(p(w))$ has finitely many irreducible components, $p^-1(p(w))$ needs to be finite.



          From the identity $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$, then follows the identity $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Dear Stefano, thank you! Actually, I don't understand that "Since $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, it follows that $p^-1(p(w))$ is finite" . My question is : (a) By a set $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, you mean it is a proper as a variety over a field $k$? (b) Why is $p^-1(p(w))$ finite? Could you explain these more precisely?
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @JiabinDu I updated the answer to address your questions.
            $endgroup$
            – Stefano
            Mar 20 at 3:27










          • $begingroup$
            Got it. You're right. Thanks again!
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 4:00












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154038%2fa-question-on-the-proof-of-rigidity-lemma-in-birational-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          I will assume that you are fine with the fact that $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. Then, set theoretically, we can check $h^-1(w) subset f^-1(p(w))$ for any $w in W$. By assumption, $f$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere; thus, by the inclusion, we deduce that $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere. Now, as $f$ is proper, then so is $h$. Therefore, $h^-1(w)$ is a proper subvariety of $f^-1(p(w))$ of the same dimension. It follows that it is the union of some of the irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$.



          Now, notice that $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$. Then, $p^-1(p(w))$ has dimension 0. Indeed, if it had bigger dimension, $f^-1(p(w))$ would have dimension at least $n+1$, as $h$ has fiber dimension $n$. Since $f$ is a proper morphism, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a proper variety over the residue field of the point $p(w)$. In particular, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a variety of finite type. This implies that it has finitely many irreducible components.



          Now, we know that $p^-1(p(w))$ is a collection of points. Since $h$ is proper and has fiber dimension $n$, for every point $w_i$ in $p^-1(p(w))$, the fiber $h^-1(w_i)$ provides a positive finite number of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$ (they are finite since $h$ is proper, we have at least 1 since we are working in the image of the morphism, but they may be more). Thus, since $f^-1(p(w))$ has finitely many irreducible components, $p^-1(p(w))$ needs to be finite.



          From the identity $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$, then follows the identity $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Dear Stefano, thank you! Actually, I don't understand that "Since $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, it follows that $p^-1(p(w))$ is finite" . My question is : (a) By a set $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, you mean it is a proper as a variety over a field $k$? (b) Why is $p^-1(p(w))$ finite? Could you explain these more precisely?
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @JiabinDu I updated the answer to address your questions.
            $endgroup$
            – Stefano
            Mar 20 at 3:27










          • $begingroup$
            Got it. You're right. Thanks again!
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 4:00
















          1












          $begingroup$

          I will assume that you are fine with the fact that $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. Then, set theoretically, we can check $h^-1(w) subset f^-1(p(w))$ for any $w in W$. By assumption, $f$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere; thus, by the inclusion, we deduce that $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere. Now, as $f$ is proper, then so is $h$. Therefore, $h^-1(w)$ is a proper subvariety of $f^-1(p(w))$ of the same dimension. It follows that it is the union of some of the irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$.



          Now, notice that $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$. Then, $p^-1(p(w))$ has dimension 0. Indeed, if it had bigger dimension, $f^-1(p(w))$ would have dimension at least $n+1$, as $h$ has fiber dimension $n$. Since $f$ is a proper morphism, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a proper variety over the residue field of the point $p(w)$. In particular, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a variety of finite type. This implies that it has finitely many irreducible components.



          Now, we know that $p^-1(p(w))$ is a collection of points. Since $h$ is proper and has fiber dimension $n$, for every point $w_i$ in $p^-1(p(w))$, the fiber $h^-1(w_i)$ provides a positive finite number of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$ (they are finite since $h$ is proper, we have at least 1 since we are working in the image of the morphism, but they may be more). Thus, since $f^-1(p(w))$ has finitely many irreducible components, $p^-1(p(w))$ needs to be finite.



          From the identity $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$, then follows the identity $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Dear Stefano, thank you! Actually, I don't understand that "Since $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, it follows that $p^-1(p(w))$ is finite" . My question is : (a) By a set $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, you mean it is a proper as a variety over a field $k$? (b) Why is $p^-1(p(w))$ finite? Could you explain these more precisely?
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @JiabinDu I updated the answer to address your questions.
            $endgroup$
            – Stefano
            Mar 20 at 3:27










          • $begingroup$
            Got it. You're right. Thanks again!
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 4:00














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          I will assume that you are fine with the fact that $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. Then, set theoretically, we can check $h^-1(w) subset f^-1(p(w))$ for any $w in W$. By assumption, $f$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere; thus, by the inclusion, we deduce that $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere. Now, as $f$ is proper, then so is $h$. Therefore, $h^-1(w)$ is a proper subvariety of $f^-1(p(w))$ of the same dimension. It follows that it is the union of some of the irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$.



          Now, notice that $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$. Then, $p^-1(p(w))$ has dimension 0. Indeed, if it had bigger dimension, $f^-1(p(w))$ would have dimension at least $n+1$, as $h$ has fiber dimension $n$. Since $f$ is a proper morphism, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a proper variety over the residue field of the point $p(w)$. In particular, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a variety of finite type. This implies that it has finitely many irreducible components.



          Now, we know that $p^-1(p(w))$ is a collection of points. Since $h$ is proper and has fiber dimension $n$, for every point $w_i$ in $p^-1(p(w))$, the fiber $h^-1(w_i)$ provides a positive finite number of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$ (they are finite since $h$ is proper, we have at least 1 since we are working in the image of the morphism, but they may be more). Thus, since $f^-1(p(w))$ has finitely many irreducible components, $p^-1(p(w))$ needs to be finite.



          From the identity $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$, then follows the identity $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          I will assume that you are fine with the fact that $h$ has fiber dimension at least $n$ everywhere. Then, set theoretically, we can check $h^-1(w) subset f^-1(p(w))$ for any $w in W$. By assumption, $f$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere; thus, by the inclusion, we deduce that $h$ has fiber dimension $n$ everywhere. Now, as $f$ is proper, then so is $h$. Therefore, $h^-1(w)$ is a proper subvariety of $f^-1(p(w))$ of the same dimension. It follows that it is the union of some of the irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$.



          Now, notice that $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$. Then, $p^-1(p(w))$ has dimension 0. Indeed, if it had bigger dimension, $f^-1(p(w))$ would have dimension at least $n+1$, as $h$ has fiber dimension $n$. Since $f$ is a proper morphism, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a proper variety over the residue field of the point $p(w)$. In particular, $f^-1(p(w))$ is a variety of finite type. This implies that it has finitely many irreducible components.



          Now, we know that $p^-1(p(w))$ is a collection of points. Since $h$ is proper and has fiber dimension $n$, for every point $w_i$ in $p^-1(p(w))$, the fiber $h^-1(w_i)$ provides a positive finite number of irreducible components of $f^-1(p(w))$ (they are finite since $h$ is proper, we have at least 1 since we are working in the image of the morphism, but they may be more). Thus, since $f^-1(p(w))$ has finitely many irreducible components, $p^-1(p(w))$ needs to be finite.



          From the identity $f^-1(p(w))=h^-1(p^-1(p(w))$, then follows the identity $h(f^-1(p(w)))=p^-1(p(w))$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 20 at 3:27

























          answered Mar 19 at 17:15









          StefanoStefano

          2,223931




          2,223931











          • $begingroup$
            Dear Stefano, thank you! Actually, I don't understand that "Since $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, it follows that $p^-1(p(w))$ is finite" . My question is : (a) By a set $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, you mean it is a proper as a variety over a field $k$? (b) Why is $p^-1(p(w))$ finite? Could you explain these more precisely?
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @JiabinDu I updated the answer to address your questions.
            $endgroup$
            – Stefano
            Mar 20 at 3:27










          • $begingroup$
            Got it. You're right. Thanks again!
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 4:00

















          • $begingroup$
            Dear Stefano, thank you! Actually, I don't understand that "Since $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, it follows that $p^-1(p(w))$ is finite" . My question is : (a) By a set $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, you mean it is a proper as a variety over a field $k$? (b) Why is $p^-1(p(w))$ finite? Could you explain these more precisely?
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 0:28










          • $begingroup$
            @JiabinDu I updated the answer to address your questions.
            $endgroup$
            – Stefano
            Mar 20 at 3:27










          • $begingroup$
            Got it. You're right. Thanks again!
            $endgroup$
            – Jiabin Du
            Mar 20 at 4:00
















          $begingroup$
          Dear Stefano, thank you! Actually, I don't understand that "Since $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, it follows that $p^-1(p(w))$ is finite" . My question is : (a) By a set $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, you mean it is a proper as a variety over a field $k$? (b) Why is $p^-1(p(w))$ finite? Could you explain these more precisely?
          $endgroup$
          – Jiabin Du
          Mar 20 at 0:28




          $begingroup$
          Dear Stefano, thank you! Actually, I don't understand that "Since $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, it follows that $p^-1(p(w))$ is finite" . My question is : (a) By a set $f^-1(p(w))$ is proper, you mean it is a proper as a variety over a field $k$? (b) Why is $p^-1(p(w))$ finite? Could you explain these more precisely?
          $endgroup$
          – Jiabin Du
          Mar 20 at 0:28












          $begingroup$
          @JiabinDu I updated the answer to address your questions.
          $endgroup$
          – Stefano
          Mar 20 at 3:27




          $begingroup$
          @JiabinDu I updated the answer to address your questions.
          $endgroup$
          – Stefano
          Mar 20 at 3:27












          $begingroup$
          Got it. You're right. Thanks again!
          $endgroup$
          – Jiabin Du
          Mar 20 at 4:00





          $begingroup$
          Got it. You're right. Thanks again!
          $endgroup$
          – Jiabin Du
          Mar 20 at 4:00


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3154038%2fa-question-on-the-proof-of-rigidity-lemma-in-birational-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer