Proposed 'exact' solution for the Asian OptionStandard deviation of the mean through bootstrap resampling of dependent samplesPut-on-call option confusionWhich Option is more expensive?American Put option problemAdjusting payoff diagram for call optionTrinomial tree option modelHow to price forward starting European call optionPencil and paper example of fitting normal distribution to data with MCMCMATLAB option pricing using the Black-Scholes transformation to Heat EquationCalculation of an European option

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

Arrow those variables!

Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?

Paid for article while in US on F-1 visa?

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

LaTeX: Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands?

Perform and show arithmetic with LuaLaTeX

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

Was any UN Security Council vote triple-vetoed?

Theorems that impeded progress

meaning of に in 本当に?

Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

Codimension of non-flat locus

NMaximize is not converging to a solution

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

Intersection point of 2 lines defined by 2 points each

Definite integral giving negative value as a result?

A case of the sniffles

Which country benefited the most from UN Security Council vetoes?

Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?



Proposed 'exact' solution for the Asian Option


Standard deviation of the mean through bootstrap resampling of dependent samplesPut-on-call option confusionWhich Option is more expensive?American Put option problemAdjusting payoff diagram for call optionTrinomial tree option modelHow to price forward starting European call optionPencil and paper example of fitting normal distribution to data with MCMCMATLAB option pricing using the Black-Scholes transformation to Heat EquationCalculation of an European option













0












$begingroup$


https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Moawia_Alghalith/publication/331075967_Exact_Pricing_of_the_Arithmetic_Asian_Options_A_Simple_Formula/links/5c704a07a6fdcc47159419a0/Exact-Pricing-of-the-Arithmetic-Asian-Options-A-Simple-Formula.pdf?origin=publication_detail



I'm trying to verify the accuracy of my Monte Carlo method for pricing mean options. I came across this paper that supposedly gives an 'exact' solution for the arithmetic mean option (asian). It's a relatively short paper but is it reliable?



I can't seem to reproduce the results shown in the paper and it is a simple calculation (or so I thought).



Please look at this extract from the paper (pg. 3):



Extract



I tried to put this into MATLAB but I don't get the 0.498 mention...instead I get 0.5004. Does this paper make a mistake? When I compare this solution to my Monte Carlo the error doesn't seem to get smaller as it should (by LLN etc.).



Sorry for the long post but i'm losing my mind trying to replicate what the paper has done. Any pointers in the right direction?



Thanks,



HP










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Moawia_Alghalith/publication/331075967_Exact_Pricing_of_the_Arithmetic_Asian_Options_A_Simple_Formula/links/5c704a07a6fdcc47159419a0/Exact-Pricing-of-the-Arithmetic-Asian-Options-A-Simple-Formula.pdf?origin=publication_detail



    I'm trying to verify the accuracy of my Monte Carlo method for pricing mean options. I came across this paper that supposedly gives an 'exact' solution for the arithmetic mean option (asian). It's a relatively short paper but is it reliable?



    I can't seem to reproduce the results shown in the paper and it is a simple calculation (or so I thought).



    Please look at this extract from the paper (pg. 3):



    Extract



    I tried to put this into MATLAB but I don't get the 0.498 mention...instead I get 0.5004. Does this paper make a mistake? When I compare this solution to my Monte Carlo the error doesn't seem to get smaller as it should (by LLN etc.).



    Sorry for the long post but i'm losing my mind trying to replicate what the paper has done. Any pointers in the right direction?



    Thanks,



    HP










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Moawia_Alghalith/publication/331075967_Exact_Pricing_of_the_Arithmetic_Asian_Options_A_Simple_Formula/links/5c704a07a6fdcc47159419a0/Exact-Pricing-of-the-Arithmetic-Asian-Options-A-Simple-Formula.pdf?origin=publication_detail



      I'm trying to verify the accuracy of my Monte Carlo method for pricing mean options. I came across this paper that supposedly gives an 'exact' solution for the arithmetic mean option (asian). It's a relatively short paper but is it reliable?



      I can't seem to reproduce the results shown in the paper and it is a simple calculation (or so I thought).



      Please look at this extract from the paper (pg. 3):



      Extract



      I tried to put this into MATLAB but I don't get the 0.498 mention...instead I get 0.5004. Does this paper make a mistake? When I compare this solution to my Monte Carlo the error doesn't seem to get smaller as it should (by LLN etc.).



      Sorry for the long post but i'm losing my mind trying to replicate what the paper has done. Any pointers in the right direction?



      Thanks,



      HP










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Moawia_Alghalith/publication/331075967_Exact_Pricing_of_the_Arithmetic_Asian_Options_A_Simple_Formula/links/5c704a07a6fdcc47159419a0/Exact-Pricing-of-the-Arithmetic-Asian-Options-A-Simple-Formula.pdf?origin=publication_detail



      I'm trying to verify the accuracy of my Monte Carlo method for pricing mean options. I came across this paper that supposedly gives an 'exact' solution for the arithmetic mean option (asian). It's a relatively short paper but is it reliable?



      I can't seem to reproduce the results shown in the paper and it is a simple calculation (or so I thought).



      Please look at this extract from the paper (pg. 3):



      Extract



      I tried to put this into MATLAB but I don't get the 0.498 mention...instead I get 0.5004. Does this paper make a mistake? When I compare this solution to my Monte Carlo the error doesn't seem to get smaller as it should (by LLN etc.).



      Sorry for the long post but i'm losing my mind trying to replicate what the paper has done. Any pointers in the right direction?



      Thanks,



      HP







      matlab finance monte-carlo






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 21 at 19:59









      Henry P.Henry P.

      107




      107




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I'm not an expert on option pricing, but the mathematics in the paper is simple and I didn't spot any obvious errors in the manipulations. You are quite right about the calculation: the answer should be $.5004$ as you've found. However, that might easily be a typo or the author copying the wrong result when typing up without noticing.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157320%2fproposed-exact-solution-for-the-asian-option%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            I'm not an expert on option pricing, but the mathematics in the paper is simple and I didn't spot any obvious errors in the manipulations. You are quite right about the calculation: the answer should be $.5004$ as you've found. However, that might easily be a typo or the author copying the wrong result when typing up without noticing.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              I'm not an expert on option pricing, but the mathematics in the paper is simple and I didn't spot any obvious errors in the manipulations. You are quite right about the calculation: the answer should be $.5004$ as you've found. However, that might easily be a typo or the author copying the wrong result when typing up without noticing.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                I'm not an expert on option pricing, but the mathematics in the paper is simple and I didn't spot any obvious errors in the manipulations. You are quite right about the calculation: the answer should be $.5004$ as you've found. However, that might easily be a typo or the author copying the wrong result when typing up without noticing.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I'm not an expert on option pricing, but the mathematics in the paper is simple and I didn't spot any obvious errors in the manipulations. You are quite right about the calculation: the answer should be $.5004$ as you've found. However, that might easily be a typo or the author copying the wrong result when typing up without noticing.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 21 at 20:53









                postmortespostmortes

                2,28031422




                2,28031422



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157320%2fproposed-exact-solution-for-the-asian-option%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye