Proposed 'exact' solution for the Asian OptionStandard deviation of the mean through bootstrap resampling of dependent samplesPut-on-call option confusionWhich Option is more expensive?American Put option problemAdjusting payoff diagram for call optionTrinomial tree option modelHow to price forward starting European call optionPencil and paper example of fitting normal distribution to data with MCMCMATLAB option pricing using the Black-Scholes transformation to Heat EquationCalculation of an European option
Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?
Arrow those variables!
Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?
Paid for article while in US on F-1 visa?
Can I make popcorn with any corn?
Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)
Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?
LaTeX: Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands?
Perform and show arithmetic with LuaLaTeX
Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?
Was any UN Security Council vote triple-vetoed?
Theorems that impeded progress
meaning of に in 本当に?
Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?
Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?
Codimension of non-flat locus
NMaximize is not converging to a solution
What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?
Intersection point of 2 lines defined by 2 points each
Definite integral giving negative value as a result?
A case of the sniffles
Which country benefited the most from UN Security Council vetoes?
Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?
What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?
Proposed 'exact' solution for the Asian Option
Standard deviation of the mean through bootstrap resampling of dependent samplesPut-on-call option confusionWhich Option is more expensive?American Put option problemAdjusting payoff diagram for call optionTrinomial tree option modelHow to price forward starting European call optionPencil and paper example of fitting normal distribution to data with MCMCMATLAB option pricing using the Black-Scholes transformation to Heat EquationCalculation of an European option
$begingroup$
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Moawia_Alghalith/publication/331075967_Exact_Pricing_of_the_Arithmetic_Asian_Options_A_Simple_Formula/links/5c704a07a6fdcc47159419a0/Exact-Pricing-of-the-Arithmetic-Asian-Options-A-Simple-Formula.pdf?origin=publication_detail
I'm trying to verify the accuracy of my Monte Carlo method for pricing mean options. I came across this paper that supposedly gives an 'exact' solution for the arithmetic mean option (asian). It's a relatively short paper but is it reliable?
I can't seem to reproduce the results shown in the paper and it is a simple calculation (or so I thought).
Please look at this extract from the paper (pg. 3):
Extract
I tried to put this into MATLAB but I don't get the 0.498 mention...instead I get 0.5004. Does this paper make a mistake? When I compare this solution to my Monte Carlo the error doesn't seem to get smaller as it should (by LLN etc.).
Sorry for the long post but i'm losing my mind trying to replicate what the paper has done. Any pointers in the right direction?
Thanks,
HP
matlab finance monte-carlo
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Moawia_Alghalith/publication/331075967_Exact_Pricing_of_the_Arithmetic_Asian_Options_A_Simple_Formula/links/5c704a07a6fdcc47159419a0/Exact-Pricing-of-the-Arithmetic-Asian-Options-A-Simple-Formula.pdf?origin=publication_detail
I'm trying to verify the accuracy of my Monte Carlo method for pricing mean options. I came across this paper that supposedly gives an 'exact' solution for the arithmetic mean option (asian). It's a relatively short paper but is it reliable?
I can't seem to reproduce the results shown in the paper and it is a simple calculation (or so I thought).
Please look at this extract from the paper (pg. 3):
Extract
I tried to put this into MATLAB but I don't get the 0.498 mention...instead I get 0.5004. Does this paper make a mistake? When I compare this solution to my Monte Carlo the error doesn't seem to get smaller as it should (by LLN etc.).
Sorry for the long post but i'm losing my mind trying to replicate what the paper has done. Any pointers in the right direction?
Thanks,
HP
matlab finance monte-carlo
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Moawia_Alghalith/publication/331075967_Exact_Pricing_of_the_Arithmetic_Asian_Options_A_Simple_Formula/links/5c704a07a6fdcc47159419a0/Exact-Pricing-of-the-Arithmetic-Asian-Options-A-Simple-Formula.pdf?origin=publication_detail
I'm trying to verify the accuracy of my Monte Carlo method for pricing mean options. I came across this paper that supposedly gives an 'exact' solution for the arithmetic mean option (asian). It's a relatively short paper but is it reliable?
I can't seem to reproduce the results shown in the paper and it is a simple calculation (or so I thought).
Please look at this extract from the paper (pg. 3):
Extract
I tried to put this into MATLAB but I don't get the 0.498 mention...instead I get 0.5004. Does this paper make a mistake? When I compare this solution to my Monte Carlo the error doesn't seem to get smaller as it should (by LLN etc.).
Sorry for the long post but i'm losing my mind trying to replicate what the paper has done. Any pointers in the right direction?
Thanks,
HP
matlab finance monte-carlo
$endgroup$
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Moawia_Alghalith/publication/331075967_Exact_Pricing_of_the_Arithmetic_Asian_Options_A_Simple_Formula/links/5c704a07a6fdcc47159419a0/Exact-Pricing-of-the-Arithmetic-Asian-Options-A-Simple-Formula.pdf?origin=publication_detail
I'm trying to verify the accuracy of my Monte Carlo method for pricing mean options. I came across this paper that supposedly gives an 'exact' solution for the arithmetic mean option (asian). It's a relatively short paper but is it reliable?
I can't seem to reproduce the results shown in the paper and it is a simple calculation (or so I thought).
Please look at this extract from the paper (pg. 3):
Extract
I tried to put this into MATLAB but I don't get the 0.498 mention...instead I get 0.5004. Does this paper make a mistake? When I compare this solution to my Monte Carlo the error doesn't seem to get smaller as it should (by LLN etc.).
Sorry for the long post but i'm losing my mind trying to replicate what the paper has done. Any pointers in the right direction?
Thanks,
HP
matlab finance monte-carlo
matlab finance monte-carlo
asked Mar 21 at 19:59
Henry P.Henry P.
107
107
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm not an expert on option pricing, but the mathematics in the paper is simple and I didn't spot any obvious errors in the manipulations. You are quite right about the calculation: the answer should be $.5004$ as you've found. However, that might easily be a typo or the author copying the wrong result when typing up without noticing.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157320%2fproposed-exact-solution-for-the-asian-option%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm not an expert on option pricing, but the mathematics in the paper is simple and I didn't spot any obvious errors in the manipulations. You are quite right about the calculation: the answer should be $.5004$ as you've found. However, that might easily be a typo or the author copying the wrong result when typing up without noticing.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm not an expert on option pricing, but the mathematics in the paper is simple and I didn't spot any obvious errors in the manipulations. You are quite right about the calculation: the answer should be $.5004$ as you've found. However, that might easily be a typo or the author copying the wrong result when typing up without noticing.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm not an expert on option pricing, but the mathematics in the paper is simple and I didn't spot any obvious errors in the manipulations. You are quite right about the calculation: the answer should be $.5004$ as you've found. However, that might easily be a typo or the author copying the wrong result when typing up without noticing.
$endgroup$
I'm not an expert on option pricing, but the mathematics in the paper is simple and I didn't spot any obvious errors in the manipulations. You are quite right about the calculation: the answer should be $.5004$ as you've found. However, that might easily be a typo or the author copying the wrong result when typing up without noticing.
answered Mar 21 at 20:53
postmortespostmortes
2,28031422
2,28031422
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157320%2fproposed-exact-solution-for-the-asian-option%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown