Finding an upper bound on composite $C^1$ functionsConstructing sequence of functionsUpper bound on the inverse of a Grammian matrixLeast Upper Bound Property Implies Greatest Lower Bound PropertyVector Euclidean norm upper bound by his coordinates average.a problem using upper boundsCan n-th derivative of Schwartz function go to $infty$ as $ntoinfty$?Mathematical Analysis by Walter Rudin, Theorem 1.11: Upper/Lower Bounds and Supremum/Infimum.Motivation to define a norm for matrix whereas it's not bounded.Real Analysis - upper and lower boundsQuestion about the range of a norm preserving extension.
Why is Minecraft giving an OpenGL error?
Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?
strTok function (thread safe, supports empty tokens, doesn't change string)
Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?
What's the output of a record needle playing an out-of-speed record
Arrow those variables!
Paid for article while in US on F-1 visa?
Alternative to sending password over mail?
Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?
Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)
Has there ever been an airliner design involving reducing generator load by installing solar panels?
What are these boxed doors outside store fronts in New York?
Rock identification in KY
Perform and show arithmetic with LuaLaTeX
Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?
tikz convert color string to hex value
Fully-Firstable Anagram Sets
I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months
Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free
Does detail obscure or enhance action?
Could an aircraft fly or hover using only jets of compressed air?
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?
Malcev's paper "On a class of homogeneous spaces" in English
Finding an upper bound on composite $C^1$ functions
Constructing sequence of functionsUpper bound on the inverse of a Grammian matrixLeast Upper Bound Property Implies Greatest Lower Bound PropertyVector Euclidean norm upper bound by his coordinates average.a problem using upper boundsCan n-th derivative of Schwartz function go to $infty$ as $ntoinfty$?Mathematical Analysis by Walter Rudin, Theorem 1.11: Upper/Lower Bounds and Supremum/Infimum.Motivation to define a norm for matrix whereas it's not bounded.Real Analysis - upper and lower boundsQuestion about the range of a norm preserving extension.
$begingroup$
The conditions for the problem I am currently tackling is as follows:
Let $T, M > 0$. Define :
$X_T := $
where $||u||_T = ^textsup_t in (0,T) [|u(t)| +|u'(t)|]$ is the norm of $C^1 ([0,T])$
Suppose that $f : mathbbR rightarrow mathbbR$ belongs to $C^1 (mathbbR)$ and that $f(0) = 0$.
For $a in mathbbR$ and $u in C^1 ([0,T])$ define:
$psi(u)(t) = a + int^t_0 f(u(s)) textds$
Small note, not sure if this is relevant, but I have previously shown that $X_T$ as defined above is a complete metric space under the above norm.
The question for this problem is as follows:
Find $M,T > 0$ (or a suitable condition on $M,T > 0$) such that $psi$ defines a map from $X_T$ to itself.
I have found a minimum value $M$ must take in terms of $a, T,$ and $u$ for a given $u in X_T$ but I can't extend this to a general value that works for all $u$.
I would like to be able to find an upper bound for $^textsup_t in (0,T) |f(u(t))|$ over all $u in X_T$ but does such a bound exist? I know there is such a bound for each $u$ individually, but I don't think our conditions on $f$ are strict enough that $f$ is bounded on $mathbbR$. We would need $f$ to be bounded on $mathbbR$ for this to work right?
Can anyone confirm that my hunch is correct, and if so suggest a different approach I might take? Thank you.
functional-analysis functions norm normed-spaces upper-lower-bounds
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The conditions for the problem I am currently tackling is as follows:
Let $T, M > 0$. Define :
$X_T := $
where $||u||_T = ^textsup_t in (0,T) [|u(t)| +|u'(t)|]$ is the norm of $C^1 ([0,T])$
Suppose that $f : mathbbR rightarrow mathbbR$ belongs to $C^1 (mathbbR)$ and that $f(0) = 0$.
For $a in mathbbR$ and $u in C^1 ([0,T])$ define:
$psi(u)(t) = a + int^t_0 f(u(s)) textds$
Small note, not sure if this is relevant, but I have previously shown that $X_T$ as defined above is a complete metric space under the above norm.
The question for this problem is as follows:
Find $M,T > 0$ (or a suitable condition on $M,T > 0$) such that $psi$ defines a map from $X_T$ to itself.
I have found a minimum value $M$ must take in terms of $a, T,$ and $u$ for a given $u in X_T$ but I can't extend this to a general value that works for all $u$.
I would like to be able to find an upper bound for $^textsup_t in (0,T) |f(u(t))|$ over all $u in X_T$ but does such a bound exist? I know there is such a bound for each $u$ individually, but I don't think our conditions on $f$ are strict enough that $f$ is bounded on $mathbbR$. We would need $f$ to be bounded on $mathbbR$ for this to work right?
Can anyone confirm that my hunch is correct, and if so suggest a different approach I might take? Thank you.
functional-analysis functions norm normed-spaces upper-lower-bounds
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ah, I feel foolish now. The key is probably the fact that the norm of $u$ is always less than or equal to $2M$. I'm working on it now...
$endgroup$
– David Hughes
Mar 7 at 16:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The conditions for the problem I am currently tackling is as follows:
Let $T, M > 0$. Define :
$X_T := $
where $||u||_T = ^textsup_t in (0,T) [|u(t)| +|u'(t)|]$ is the norm of $C^1 ([0,T])$
Suppose that $f : mathbbR rightarrow mathbbR$ belongs to $C^1 (mathbbR)$ and that $f(0) = 0$.
For $a in mathbbR$ and $u in C^1 ([0,T])$ define:
$psi(u)(t) = a + int^t_0 f(u(s)) textds$
Small note, not sure if this is relevant, but I have previously shown that $X_T$ as defined above is a complete metric space under the above norm.
The question for this problem is as follows:
Find $M,T > 0$ (or a suitable condition on $M,T > 0$) such that $psi$ defines a map from $X_T$ to itself.
I have found a minimum value $M$ must take in terms of $a, T,$ and $u$ for a given $u in X_T$ but I can't extend this to a general value that works for all $u$.
I would like to be able to find an upper bound for $^textsup_t in (0,T) |f(u(t))|$ over all $u in X_T$ but does such a bound exist? I know there is such a bound for each $u$ individually, but I don't think our conditions on $f$ are strict enough that $f$ is bounded on $mathbbR$. We would need $f$ to be bounded on $mathbbR$ for this to work right?
Can anyone confirm that my hunch is correct, and if so suggest a different approach I might take? Thank you.
functional-analysis functions norm normed-spaces upper-lower-bounds
$endgroup$
The conditions for the problem I am currently tackling is as follows:
Let $T, M > 0$. Define :
$X_T := $
where $||u||_T = ^textsup_t in (0,T) [|u(t)| +|u'(t)|]$ is the norm of $C^1 ([0,T])$
Suppose that $f : mathbbR rightarrow mathbbR$ belongs to $C^1 (mathbbR)$ and that $f(0) = 0$.
For $a in mathbbR$ and $u in C^1 ([0,T])$ define:
$psi(u)(t) = a + int^t_0 f(u(s)) textds$
Small note, not sure if this is relevant, but I have previously shown that $X_T$ as defined above is a complete metric space under the above norm.
The question for this problem is as follows:
Find $M,T > 0$ (or a suitable condition on $M,T > 0$) such that $psi$ defines a map from $X_T$ to itself.
I have found a minimum value $M$ must take in terms of $a, T,$ and $u$ for a given $u in X_T$ but I can't extend this to a general value that works for all $u$.
I would like to be able to find an upper bound for $^textsup_t in (0,T) |f(u(t))|$ over all $u in X_T$ but does such a bound exist? I know there is such a bound for each $u$ individually, but I don't think our conditions on $f$ are strict enough that $f$ is bounded on $mathbbR$. We would need $f$ to be bounded on $mathbbR$ for this to work right?
Can anyone confirm that my hunch is correct, and if so suggest a different approach I might take? Thank you.
functional-analysis functions norm normed-spaces upper-lower-bounds
functional-analysis functions norm normed-spaces upper-lower-bounds
asked Mar 7 at 16:43
David HughesDavid Hughes
1607
1607
$begingroup$
Ah, I feel foolish now. The key is probably the fact that the norm of $u$ is always less than or equal to $2M$. I'm working on it now...
$endgroup$
– David Hughes
Mar 7 at 16:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Ah, I feel foolish now. The key is probably the fact that the norm of $u$ is always less than or equal to $2M$. I'm working on it now...
$endgroup$
– David Hughes
Mar 7 at 16:48
$begingroup$
Ah, I feel foolish now. The key is probably the fact that the norm of $u$ is always less than or equal to $2M$. I'm working on it now...
$endgroup$
– David Hughes
Mar 7 at 16:48
$begingroup$
Ah, I feel foolish now. The key is probably the fact that the norm of $u$ is always less than or equal to $2M$. I'm working on it now...
$endgroup$
– David Hughes
Mar 7 at 16:48
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It turns out that my professor made a mistake in setting this question. It does not necessarily have a solution unless we are given a bound $|f| leq 1$ on some $(−2M,2M)$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3139065%2ffinding-an-upper-bound-on-composite-c1-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It turns out that my professor made a mistake in setting this question. It does not necessarily have a solution unless we are given a bound $|f| leq 1$ on some $(−2M,2M)$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It turns out that my professor made a mistake in setting this question. It does not necessarily have a solution unless we are given a bound $|f| leq 1$ on some $(−2M,2M)$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It turns out that my professor made a mistake in setting this question. It does not necessarily have a solution unless we are given a bound $|f| leq 1$ on some $(−2M,2M)$
$endgroup$
It turns out that my professor made a mistake in setting this question. It does not necessarily have a solution unless we are given a bound $|f| leq 1$ on some $(−2M,2M)$
answered Mar 21 at 18:42
David HughesDavid Hughes
1607
1607
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3139065%2ffinding-an-upper-bound-on-composite-c1-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Ah, I feel foolish now. The key is probably the fact that the norm of $u$ is always less than or equal to $2M$. I'm working on it now...
$endgroup$
– David Hughes
Mar 7 at 16:48