Theorems & Proof Corrections [discrete mathematics]Prove if $n^2$ is even, then $n^2$ is divisible by 4Proof by cases and contradiction. Is this valid?Is this a valid proof? Discrete MathematicsDiscrete Mathematics: Prove Expression Is EvenDiscrete Math (Proof Techniques)Does the following work as a proof for the intermediate value theorum?Confusion proof by contradiction when starting from conclusionThe “assumption” in proof by inductionIndirect Proof [discrete mathematics]Big-$O$ verification [discrete mathematics]

How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

Doing something right before you need it - expression for this?

A case of the sniffles

What does the "remote control" for a QF-4 look like?

High voltage LED indicator 40-1000 VDC without additional power supply

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

Paid for article while in US on F-1 visa?

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

Can a vampire attack twice with their claws using Multiattack?

Character reincarnated...as a snail

When a company launches a new product do they "come out" with a new product or do they "come up" with a new product?

Codimension of non-flat locus

How to determine what difficulty is right for the game?

Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?

LaTeX: Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands?

Was any UN Security Council vote triple-vetoed?

NMaximize is not converging to a solution

Which country benefited the most from UN Security Council vetoes?

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free

Roll the carpet



Theorems & Proof Corrections [discrete mathematics]


Prove if $n^2$ is even, then $n^2$ is divisible by 4Proof by cases and contradiction. Is this valid?Is this a valid proof? Discrete MathematicsDiscrete Mathematics: Prove Expression Is EvenDiscrete Math (Proof Techniques)Does the following work as a proof for the intermediate value theorum?Confusion proof by contradiction when starting from conclusionThe “assumption” in proof by inductionIndirect Proof [discrete mathematics]Big-$O$ verification [discrete mathematics]













0












$begingroup$


So I've recently started a new chapter in my discrete mathematics course on proof methods. I have come across this problem in my textbook but I'm having a very hard time understanding where to start and what to look for. In all honesty, all the proofs for the theorems look correct to me.




Each of the following theorems is either valid or invalid, but the
proof given is incorrect even if the theorem is valid. Explain briefly
what mistake was made in each case:




  1. Theorem: Let $f$, $g$ and $h$ be three functions from $mathbfN$ into $mathbfR^+$. If $f in O(g)$ and $g in O(h)$,
    then $f in O(h)$.



    Proof: Consider three unspecified functions $f$, $g$ and $h$ $mathbfN$ into $mathbfR^+$. Assume that $f in O(g)$ and $g in O(h)$. Since $f in O(g)$, there is a real number $c$ and a positive
    integer $n_0$ such that for every $n ge n_0$, $f(n) le cg(n)$.
    Similarly, for every $n ge n_0$, $g(n) le ch(n)$. Therefore, for
    every $n ge n_0$, $f(n) le cg(n) le c(ch(n)) = c^2 h(n)$. Hence
    $f in O(h)$ using the constants $c^2$ and $n_0$.




  2. Theorem: If $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0$, then $n ge 2$.



    Proof: When $n ge 2$, we know that $n^2 ge 4$, so $n^2 + n ge 6$, and therefore $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0$.




  3. Theorem: No matter how we choose an integer $n$, the value $n^3 + n$ will be even.



    Proof: We use a proof by contradiction. Assume that the theorem is false. That is, $n^3 + n$ is odd. This is not true, as
    we can see by choosing $n = 2$ ($2^3 + 2 = 10$, which is even). So
    we have found a contradiction, which means the theorem is true.





Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What is $O(g)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Shore
    Mar 21 at 18:41







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For Theorem 2, check out what happens when $n = -100.$ You'll see (I think) that this is a counterexample to the theorem. What happens when you apply the supposed proof to this counterexample? Does that help you see why it's not actually a proof?
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Shore
    Mar 21 at 18:44










  • $begingroup$
    For the second theorem, you're only proving that every $ngeq 2$ satisfies $n^2+n-6geq 0$ but not in the other direction...
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 21 at 18:46










  • $begingroup$
    For the third theorem, the assumption to be disproved should be $n^3+n$ isn't always even instead of '$n^3+n$ is odd'...
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 21 at 18:48
















0












$begingroup$


So I've recently started a new chapter in my discrete mathematics course on proof methods. I have come across this problem in my textbook but I'm having a very hard time understanding where to start and what to look for. In all honesty, all the proofs for the theorems look correct to me.




Each of the following theorems is either valid or invalid, but the
proof given is incorrect even if the theorem is valid. Explain briefly
what mistake was made in each case:




  1. Theorem: Let $f$, $g$ and $h$ be three functions from $mathbfN$ into $mathbfR^+$. If $f in O(g)$ and $g in O(h)$,
    then $f in O(h)$.



    Proof: Consider three unspecified functions $f$, $g$ and $h$ $mathbfN$ into $mathbfR^+$. Assume that $f in O(g)$ and $g in O(h)$. Since $f in O(g)$, there is a real number $c$ and a positive
    integer $n_0$ such that for every $n ge n_0$, $f(n) le cg(n)$.
    Similarly, for every $n ge n_0$, $g(n) le ch(n)$. Therefore, for
    every $n ge n_0$, $f(n) le cg(n) le c(ch(n)) = c^2 h(n)$. Hence
    $f in O(h)$ using the constants $c^2$ and $n_0$.




  2. Theorem: If $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0$, then $n ge 2$.



    Proof: When $n ge 2$, we know that $n^2 ge 4$, so $n^2 + n ge 6$, and therefore $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0$.




  3. Theorem: No matter how we choose an integer $n$, the value $n^3 + n$ will be even.



    Proof: We use a proof by contradiction. Assume that the theorem is false. That is, $n^3 + n$ is odd. This is not true, as
    we can see by choosing $n = 2$ ($2^3 + 2 = 10$, which is even). So
    we have found a contradiction, which means the theorem is true.





Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What is $O(g)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Shore
    Mar 21 at 18:41







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For Theorem 2, check out what happens when $n = -100.$ You'll see (I think) that this is a counterexample to the theorem. What happens when you apply the supposed proof to this counterexample? Does that help you see why it's not actually a proof?
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Shore
    Mar 21 at 18:44










  • $begingroup$
    For the second theorem, you're only proving that every $ngeq 2$ satisfies $n^2+n-6geq 0$ but not in the other direction...
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 21 at 18:46










  • $begingroup$
    For the third theorem, the assumption to be disproved should be $n^3+n$ isn't always even instead of '$n^3+n$ is odd'...
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 21 at 18:48














0












0








0





$begingroup$


So I've recently started a new chapter in my discrete mathematics course on proof methods. I have come across this problem in my textbook but I'm having a very hard time understanding where to start and what to look for. In all honesty, all the proofs for the theorems look correct to me.




Each of the following theorems is either valid or invalid, but the
proof given is incorrect even if the theorem is valid. Explain briefly
what mistake was made in each case:




  1. Theorem: Let $f$, $g$ and $h$ be three functions from $mathbfN$ into $mathbfR^+$. If $f in O(g)$ and $g in O(h)$,
    then $f in O(h)$.



    Proof: Consider three unspecified functions $f$, $g$ and $h$ $mathbfN$ into $mathbfR^+$. Assume that $f in O(g)$ and $g in O(h)$. Since $f in O(g)$, there is a real number $c$ and a positive
    integer $n_0$ such that for every $n ge n_0$, $f(n) le cg(n)$.
    Similarly, for every $n ge n_0$, $g(n) le ch(n)$. Therefore, for
    every $n ge n_0$, $f(n) le cg(n) le c(ch(n)) = c^2 h(n)$. Hence
    $f in O(h)$ using the constants $c^2$ and $n_0$.




  2. Theorem: If $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0$, then $n ge 2$.



    Proof: When $n ge 2$, we know that $n^2 ge 4$, so $n^2 + n ge 6$, and therefore $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0$.




  3. Theorem: No matter how we choose an integer $n$, the value $n^3 + n$ will be even.



    Proof: We use a proof by contradiction. Assume that the theorem is false. That is, $n^3 + n$ is odd. This is not true, as
    we can see by choosing $n = 2$ ($2^3 + 2 = 10$, which is even). So
    we have found a contradiction, which means the theorem is true.





Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




So I've recently started a new chapter in my discrete mathematics course on proof methods. I have come across this problem in my textbook but I'm having a very hard time understanding where to start and what to look for. In all honesty, all the proofs for the theorems look correct to me.




Each of the following theorems is either valid or invalid, but the
proof given is incorrect even if the theorem is valid. Explain briefly
what mistake was made in each case:




  1. Theorem: Let $f$, $g$ and $h$ be three functions from $mathbfN$ into $mathbfR^+$. If $f in O(g)$ and $g in O(h)$,
    then $f in O(h)$.



    Proof: Consider three unspecified functions $f$, $g$ and $h$ $mathbfN$ into $mathbfR^+$. Assume that $f in O(g)$ and $g in O(h)$. Since $f in O(g)$, there is a real number $c$ and a positive
    integer $n_0$ such that for every $n ge n_0$, $f(n) le cg(n)$.
    Similarly, for every $n ge n_0$, $g(n) le ch(n)$. Therefore, for
    every $n ge n_0$, $f(n) le cg(n) le c(ch(n)) = c^2 h(n)$. Hence
    $f in O(h)$ using the constants $c^2$ and $n_0$.




  2. Theorem: If $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0$, then $n ge 2$.



    Proof: When $n ge 2$, we know that $n^2 ge 4$, so $n^2 + n ge 6$, and therefore $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0$.




  3. Theorem: No matter how we choose an integer $n$, the value $n^3 + n$ will be even.



    Proof: We use a proof by contradiction. Assume that the theorem is false. That is, $n^3 + n$ is odd. This is not true, as
    we can see by choosing $n = 2$ ($2^3 + 2 = 10$, which is even). So
    we have found a contradiction, which means the theorem is true.





Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!







discrete-mathematics proof-verification proof-writing proof-explanation recreational-mathematics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 21 at 18:43







Joe Biden

















asked Mar 21 at 18:33









Joe BidenJoe Biden

65




65











  • $begingroup$
    What is $O(g)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Shore
    Mar 21 at 18:41







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For Theorem 2, check out what happens when $n = -100.$ You'll see (I think) that this is a counterexample to the theorem. What happens when you apply the supposed proof to this counterexample? Does that help you see why it's not actually a proof?
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Shore
    Mar 21 at 18:44










  • $begingroup$
    For the second theorem, you're only proving that every $ngeq 2$ satisfies $n^2+n-6geq 0$ but not in the other direction...
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 21 at 18:46










  • $begingroup$
    For the third theorem, the assumption to be disproved should be $n^3+n$ isn't always even instead of '$n^3+n$ is odd'...
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 21 at 18:48

















  • $begingroup$
    What is $O(g)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Shore
    Mar 21 at 18:41







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    For Theorem 2, check out what happens when $n = -100.$ You'll see (I think) that this is a counterexample to the theorem. What happens when you apply the supposed proof to this counterexample? Does that help you see why it's not actually a proof?
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Shore
    Mar 21 at 18:44










  • $begingroup$
    For the second theorem, you're only proving that every $ngeq 2$ satisfies $n^2+n-6geq 0$ but not in the other direction...
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 21 at 18:46










  • $begingroup$
    For the third theorem, the assumption to be disproved should be $n^3+n$ isn't always even instead of '$n^3+n$ is odd'...
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 21 at 18:48
















$begingroup$
What is $O(g)$?
$endgroup$
– Robert Shore
Mar 21 at 18:41





$begingroup$
What is $O(g)$?
$endgroup$
– Robert Shore
Mar 21 at 18:41





1




1




$begingroup$
For Theorem 2, check out what happens when $n = -100.$ You'll see (I think) that this is a counterexample to the theorem. What happens when you apply the supposed proof to this counterexample? Does that help you see why it's not actually a proof?
$endgroup$
– Robert Shore
Mar 21 at 18:44




$begingroup$
For Theorem 2, check out what happens when $n = -100.$ You'll see (I think) that this is a counterexample to the theorem. What happens when you apply the supposed proof to this counterexample? Does that help you see why it's not actually a proof?
$endgroup$
– Robert Shore
Mar 21 at 18:44












$begingroup$
For the second theorem, you're only proving that every $ngeq 2$ satisfies $n^2+n-6geq 0$ but not in the other direction...
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
Mar 21 at 18:46




$begingroup$
For the second theorem, you're only proving that every $ngeq 2$ satisfies $n^2+n-6geq 0$ but not in the other direction...
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
Mar 21 at 18:46












$begingroup$
For the third theorem, the assumption to be disproved should be $n^3+n$ isn't always even instead of '$n^3+n$ is odd'...
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
Mar 21 at 18:48





$begingroup$
For the third theorem, the assumption to be disproved should be $n^3+n$ isn't always even instead of '$n^3+n$ is odd'...
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
Mar 21 at 18:48











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Apply the proof of theorem 1 to the particular functions $f(n) = 2, g(n) = n, h(n) = frac n^216$. Find the best $n_0$ and $c$ to show $f in O(g)$, and then check that against the final line of the proof.



For 2, the theorem is $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0 implies n ge 2$. That is, from $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0$, you can prove that $n ge 2$. Is that what their "proof" does?



For 3, here is a very similar proof:



Theorem for all $n$, $n$ is odd.



Proof: Suppose not, then $n$ is even, but that is false, because when $n = 1$, $n$ is not even. A contradiction, so the theorem is true.



Can you spot the error in this version?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157210%2ftheorems-proof-corrections-discrete-mathematics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Apply the proof of theorem 1 to the particular functions $f(n) = 2, g(n) = n, h(n) = frac n^216$. Find the best $n_0$ and $c$ to show $f in O(g)$, and then check that against the final line of the proof.



    For 2, the theorem is $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0 implies n ge 2$. That is, from $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0$, you can prove that $n ge 2$. Is that what their "proof" does?



    For 3, here is a very similar proof:



    Theorem for all $n$, $n$ is odd.



    Proof: Suppose not, then $n$ is even, but that is false, because when $n = 1$, $n$ is not even. A contradiction, so the theorem is true.



    Can you spot the error in this version?






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      Apply the proof of theorem 1 to the particular functions $f(n) = 2, g(n) = n, h(n) = frac n^216$. Find the best $n_0$ and $c$ to show $f in O(g)$, and then check that against the final line of the proof.



      For 2, the theorem is $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0 implies n ge 2$. That is, from $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0$, you can prove that $n ge 2$. Is that what their "proof" does?



      For 3, here is a very similar proof:



      Theorem for all $n$, $n$ is odd.



      Proof: Suppose not, then $n$ is even, but that is false, because when $n = 1$, $n$ is not even. A contradiction, so the theorem is true.



      Can you spot the error in this version?






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Apply the proof of theorem 1 to the particular functions $f(n) = 2, g(n) = n, h(n) = frac n^216$. Find the best $n_0$ and $c$ to show $f in O(g)$, and then check that against the final line of the proof.



        For 2, the theorem is $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0 implies n ge 2$. That is, from $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0$, you can prove that $n ge 2$. Is that what their "proof" does?



        For 3, here is a very similar proof:



        Theorem for all $n$, $n$ is odd.



        Proof: Suppose not, then $n$ is even, but that is false, because when $n = 1$, $n$ is not even. A contradiction, so the theorem is true.



        Can you spot the error in this version?






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Apply the proof of theorem 1 to the particular functions $f(n) = 2, g(n) = n, h(n) = frac n^216$. Find the best $n_0$ and $c$ to show $f in O(g)$, and then check that against the final line of the proof.



        For 2, the theorem is $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0 implies n ge 2$. That is, from $n^2 + n - 6 ge 0$, you can prove that $n ge 2$. Is that what their "proof" does?



        For 3, here is a very similar proof:



        Theorem for all $n$, $n$ is odd.



        Proof: Suppose not, then $n$ is even, but that is false, because when $n = 1$, $n$ is not even. A contradiction, so the theorem is true.



        Can you spot the error in this version?







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 22 at 2:27









        Paul SinclairPaul Sinclair

        20.7k21543




        20.7k21543



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157210%2ftheorems-proof-corrections-discrete-mathematics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

            Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

            Urgehal History Discography Band members References External links Navigation menu"Mediateket: Urgehal""Interview with Enzifer of Urgehal, 2007""Urgehal - Interview"Urgehal"Urgehal Frontman Trondr Nefas Dies at 35"Urgehal9042691cb161873230(data)0000 0001 0669 4224no2016126817ee6ccef6-e558-44b6-b059-dbbb5b913b24145036459145036459