Cyclotomic polynomial identity proof with primes.Cyclotomic Polynomial of a PrimeProperties of cyclotomic polynomialIdentity Involving Cyclotomic PolynomialsA cyclotomic polynomial whose index has a large prime divisor cannot be too sparsecyclotomic polynomial $Phi_2n(x)$Finding the $18$th cyclotomic polynomial $phi_18(X))$.Product of cyclotomic polynomialsCoefficients of $pq$-th cyclotomic polynomial for distinct primes $pq$Several identities regarding cyclotomic polynomials.

Arrow those variables!

How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

NMaximize is not converging to a solution

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

Client team has low performances and low technical skills: we always fix their work and now they stop collaborate with us. How to solve?

Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?

How do I draw and define two right triangles next to each other?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

How to draw a waving flag in TikZ

Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

Why is 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there's 300k+ births a month?

How do I gain back my faith in my PhD degree?

Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)

Does an object always see its latest internal state irrespective of thread?

Why is consensus so controversial in Britain?

LWC SFDX source push error TypeError: LWC1009: decl.moveTo is not a function

Can you really stack all of this on an Opportunity Attack?

What's the output of a record needle playing an out-of-speed record

Alternative to sending password over mail?

High voltage LED indicator 40-1000 VDC without additional power supply

How to format long polynomial?



Cyclotomic polynomial identity proof with primes.


Cyclotomic Polynomial of a PrimeProperties of cyclotomic polynomialIdentity Involving Cyclotomic PolynomialsA cyclotomic polynomial whose index has a large prime divisor cannot be too sparsecyclotomic polynomial $Phi_2n(x)$Finding the $18$th cyclotomic polynomial $phi_18(X))$.Product of cyclotomic polynomialsCoefficients of $pq$-th cyclotomic polynomial for distinct primes $pq$Several identities regarding cyclotomic polynomials.













1












$begingroup$



If p is prime, show that $Phi_p(x^p^k-1)=Phi_p^k(x)$.




Here is my attempt:



$x^p^k-1=prod_p^kPhi_d(x)=prod_i=1^kPhi_p^i(x)=Phi_p^k(x)(Phi_pPhi_p^2cdots Phi_p^k-1)=(x^p^k-1)^p-1=(x^p^k-1-1)Phi_p(x^p^k-1)$



But how do I show that $x^p^k-1-1=Phi_pPhi_p^2cdots Phi_p^k-1$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    In this product you omitted a factor $Phi_1(x)$. In fact, $x^p^k-1=Phi_1(x)Phi_p(x)Phi_p^2(x)cdotsPhi_p^k(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Mar 21 at 20:52











  • $begingroup$
    @LordSharktheUnknown Oops, that is totally my bad. Then it is just by definition (?) that they are equal (of course when I include the factor $Phi_1$...!)
    $endgroup$
    – numericalorange
    Mar 21 at 20:56











  • $begingroup$
    What is your definition of $Phi_n(x)$? My definition is that it is the minimal polynomial of a primitive $n$th root of unity. By standard Galois theory, one can show the roots of $Phi_n(x)$ are precisely all of the primitive $n$th roots, and therefore $x^n-1$ is $prod_dmid nPhi_d(x)$ since both are monic and have the exact same set of (distinct) roots.
    $endgroup$
    – arctic tern
    Mar 22 at 16:21
















1












$begingroup$



If p is prime, show that $Phi_p(x^p^k-1)=Phi_p^k(x)$.




Here is my attempt:



$x^p^k-1=prod_p^kPhi_d(x)=prod_i=1^kPhi_p^i(x)=Phi_p^k(x)(Phi_pPhi_p^2cdots Phi_p^k-1)=(x^p^k-1)^p-1=(x^p^k-1-1)Phi_p(x^p^k-1)$



But how do I show that $x^p^k-1-1=Phi_pPhi_p^2cdots Phi_p^k-1$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    In this product you omitted a factor $Phi_1(x)$. In fact, $x^p^k-1=Phi_1(x)Phi_p(x)Phi_p^2(x)cdotsPhi_p^k(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Mar 21 at 20:52











  • $begingroup$
    @LordSharktheUnknown Oops, that is totally my bad. Then it is just by definition (?) that they are equal (of course when I include the factor $Phi_1$...!)
    $endgroup$
    – numericalorange
    Mar 21 at 20:56











  • $begingroup$
    What is your definition of $Phi_n(x)$? My definition is that it is the minimal polynomial of a primitive $n$th root of unity. By standard Galois theory, one can show the roots of $Phi_n(x)$ are precisely all of the primitive $n$th roots, and therefore $x^n-1$ is $prod_dmid nPhi_d(x)$ since both are monic and have the exact same set of (distinct) roots.
    $endgroup$
    – arctic tern
    Mar 22 at 16:21














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$



If p is prime, show that $Phi_p(x^p^k-1)=Phi_p^k(x)$.




Here is my attempt:



$x^p^k-1=prod_p^kPhi_d(x)=prod_i=1^kPhi_p^i(x)=Phi_p^k(x)(Phi_pPhi_p^2cdots Phi_p^k-1)=(x^p^k-1)^p-1=(x^p^k-1-1)Phi_p(x^p^k-1)$



But how do I show that $x^p^k-1-1=Phi_pPhi_p^2cdots Phi_p^k-1$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$





If p is prime, show that $Phi_p(x^p^k-1)=Phi_p^k(x)$.




Here is my attempt:



$x^p^k-1=prod_p^kPhi_d(x)=prod_i=1^kPhi_p^i(x)=Phi_p^k(x)(Phi_pPhi_p^2cdots Phi_p^k-1)=(x^p^k-1)^p-1=(x^p^k-1-1)Phi_p(x^p^k-1)$



But how do I show that $x^p^k-1-1=Phi_pPhi_p^2cdots Phi_p^k-1$?







prime-numbers proof-explanation cyclotomic-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 21 at 20:09









numericalorangenumericalorange

1,879313




1,879313











  • $begingroup$
    In this product you omitted a factor $Phi_1(x)$. In fact, $x^p^k-1=Phi_1(x)Phi_p(x)Phi_p^2(x)cdotsPhi_p^k(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Mar 21 at 20:52











  • $begingroup$
    @LordSharktheUnknown Oops, that is totally my bad. Then it is just by definition (?) that they are equal (of course when I include the factor $Phi_1$...!)
    $endgroup$
    – numericalorange
    Mar 21 at 20:56











  • $begingroup$
    What is your definition of $Phi_n(x)$? My definition is that it is the minimal polynomial of a primitive $n$th root of unity. By standard Galois theory, one can show the roots of $Phi_n(x)$ are precisely all of the primitive $n$th roots, and therefore $x^n-1$ is $prod_dmid nPhi_d(x)$ since both are monic and have the exact same set of (distinct) roots.
    $endgroup$
    – arctic tern
    Mar 22 at 16:21

















  • $begingroup$
    In this product you omitted a factor $Phi_1(x)$. In fact, $x^p^k-1=Phi_1(x)Phi_p(x)Phi_p^2(x)cdotsPhi_p^k(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Mar 21 at 20:52











  • $begingroup$
    @LordSharktheUnknown Oops, that is totally my bad. Then it is just by definition (?) that they are equal (of course when I include the factor $Phi_1$...!)
    $endgroup$
    – numericalorange
    Mar 21 at 20:56











  • $begingroup$
    What is your definition of $Phi_n(x)$? My definition is that it is the minimal polynomial of a primitive $n$th root of unity. By standard Galois theory, one can show the roots of $Phi_n(x)$ are precisely all of the primitive $n$th roots, and therefore $x^n-1$ is $prod_dmid nPhi_d(x)$ since both are monic and have the exact same set of (distinct) roots.
    $endgroup$
    – arctic tern
    Mar 22 at 16:21
















$begingroup$
In this product you omitted a factor $Phi_1(x)$. In fact, $x^p^k-1=Phi_1(x)Phi_p(x)Phi_p^2(x)cdotsPhi_p^k(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Mar 21 at 20:52





$begingroup$
In this product you omitted a factor $Phi_1(x)$. In fact, $x^p^k-1=Phi_1(x)Phi_p(x)Phi_p^2(x)cdotsPhi_p^k(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Mar 21 at 20:52













$begingroup$
@LordSharktheUnknown Oops, that is totally my bad. Then it is just by definition (?) that they are equal (of course when I include the factor $Phi_1$...!)
$endgroup$
– numericalorange
Mar 21 at 20:56





$begingroup$
@LordSharktheUnknown Oops, that is totally my bad. Then it is just by definition (?) that they are equal (of course when I include the factor $Phi_1$...!)
$endgroup$
– numericalorange
Mar 21 at 20:56













$begingroup$
What is your definition of $Phi_n(x)$? My definition is that it is the minimal polynomial of a primitive $n$th root of unity. By standard Galois theory, one can show the roots of $Phi_n(x)$ are precisely all of the primitive $n$th roots, and therefore $x^n-1$ is $prod_dmid nPhi_d(x)$ since both are monic and have the exact same set of (distinct) roots.
$endgroup$
– arctic tern
Mar 22 at 16:21





$begingroup$
What is your definition of $Phi_n(x)$? My definition is that it is the minimal polynomial of a primitive $n$th root of unity. By standard Galois theory, one can show the roots of $Phi_n(x)$ are precisely all of the primitive $n$th roots, and therefore $x^n-1$ is $prod_dmid nPhi_d(x)$ since both are monic and have the exact same set of (distinct) roots.
$endgroup$
– arctic tern
Mar 22 at 16:21











0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157332%2fcyclotomic-polynomial-identity-proof-with-primes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157332%2fcyclotomic-polynomial-identity-proof-with-primes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye