Is this subset of $M_4(mathbb R)$ connected?Are matrices which yield a given characteristic polynomial and have specified structure connected?Is the set of real matrices diagonalizable in $M_n(mathbb C)$ dense in the set of block like companion matrices?Are matrices which yield a given characteristic polynomial and have specified structure connected?When are almost block companion matrices which yield a given characteristic polynomial connected?Does this subset of $GL_n(mathbb R)$ have two connected components or more?How many connected components does this subset of $GL_n(mathbb R)$ have?Is this subset of $GL_5(mathbb R)$ under Vandermonde-like parametrization of square matrices path-connected?Does this subset of $GL_2(mathbb R)$ under Vandermonde-like parametrization have precisely two path-connected components?Is $A in E: A text has distinct eigenvalues$ dense in $E = A in M_n(mathbb R): max_i textRe(lambda_i(A))=0$?Are matrices diagonalizable dense in a specific parametrization of $M_5(mathbb R)$?Charaterize the boundary of the set $A in star: max_i textRe(lambda_i(A)) < 0$ where $star$ is some structure on $M_5(mathbb R)$

Codimension of non-flat locus

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

Modeling an IP Address

strTok function (thread safe, supports empty tokens, doesn't change string)

Alternative to sending password over mail?

What does the "remote control" for a QF-4 look like?

Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)

Intersection point of 2 lines defined by 2 points each

Can a(n) = n/n+1 be written recursively?

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

Does detail obscure or enhance action?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

What's that red-plus icon near a text?

dbcc cleantable batch size explanation

tikz convert color string to hex value

Character reincarnated...as a snail

Why is 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there's 300k+ births a month?

A case of the sniffles

Paid for article while in US on F-1 visa?

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

How to format long polynomial?



Is this subset of $M_4(mathbb R)$ connected?


Are matrices which yield a given characteristic polynomial and have specified structure connected?Is the set of real matrices diagonalizable in $M_n(mathbb C)$ dense in the set of block like companion matrices?Are matrices which yield a given characteristic polynomial and have specified structure connected?When are almost block companion matrices which yield a given characteristic polynomial connected?Does this subset of $GL_n(mathbb R)$ have two connected components or more?How many connected components does this subset of $GL_n(mathbb R)$ have?Is this subset of $GL_5(mathbb R)$ under Vandermonde-like parametrization of square matrices path-connected?Does this subset of $GL_2(mathbb R)$ under Vandermonde-like parametrization have precisely two path-connected components?Is $A in E: A text has distinct eigenvalues$ dense in $E = A in M_n(mathbb R): max_i textRe(lambda_i(A))=0$?Are matrices diagonalizable dense in a specific parametrization of $M_5(mathbb R)$?Charaterize the boundary of the set $A in star: max_i textRe(lambda_i(A)) < 0$ where $star$ is some structure on $M_5(mathbb R)$













5












$begingroup$


Let us consider an affine structure $star$ of $M_4(mathbb R)$ which has following form
beginalign*
beginpmatrix
0 & * & 0 & * \
1 & * & 0 & * \
0 & * & 0 & * \
0 & * & 1 & *
endpmatrix,
endalign*

where $*$ can assume any real number. It is also clear for any monic $4^th$ degree real polynomial, we can at least find one realization in $star$ since the upper left block and lower right block can be considered as in companion form. We further concern this set
beginalign*
mathcal E = A in star: max_i left( lambda_i(A) right) < 0 .
endalign*

In other words, all elements in $mathcal E$ has above defined structure and all eigenvalues on the left open half plane. I am trying to determine whether the set $mathcal E$ is connected.




My first try was to determine for a fixed monic polynomial, whether all realizations in $star$ is connected. If this is true, for any $A_1, A_2 in mathcal E$, we may first connect them to a companion form in $star$ (by making the $32$ entry to be $1$ and other entries in the second column to be $0$) without changing the eigenvalues, and then the companion forms are connected as a consequence of property of polynomials. But as the question I asked a while ago, this is only true if it has at least one real eigenvalue.



I strongly believe the set is connected. The question is related but I am not sure it is that related. Because the condition there is much more strict. I was asking to connect all realizations in $star$ yielding the same characteristic equation without changing its eigenvalues. Here we allow this to vary inside $mathcal E$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    Let us consider an affine structure $star$ of $M_4(mathbb R)$ which has following form
    beginalign*
    beginpmatrix
    0 & * & 0 & * \
    1 & * & 0 & * \
    0 & * & 0 & * \
    0 & * & 1 & *
    endpmatrix,
    endalign*

    where $*$ can assume any real number. It is also clear for any monic $4^th$ degree real polynomial, we can at least find one realization in $star$ since the upper left block and lower right block can be considered as in companion form. We further concern this set
    beginalign*
    mathcal E = A in star: max_i left( lambda_i(A) right) < 0 .
    endalign*

    In other words, all elements in $mathcal E$ has above defined structure and all eigenvalues on the left open half plane. I am trying to determine whether the set $mathcal E$ is connected.




    My first try was to determine for a fixed monic polynomial, whether all realizations in $star$ is connected. If this is true, for any $A_1, A_2 in mathcal E$, we may first connect them to a companion form in $star$ (by making the $32$ entry to be $1$ and other entries in the second column to be $0$) without changing the eigenvalues, and then the companion forms are connected as a consequence of property of polynomials. But as the question I asked a while ago, this is only true if it has at least one real eigenvalue.



    I strongly believe the set is connected. The question is related but I am not sure it is that related. Because the condition there is much more strict. I was asking to connect all realizations in $star$ yielding the same characteristic equation without changing its eigenvalues. Here we allow this to vary inside $mathcal E$.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5


      0



      $begingroup$


      Let us consider an affine structure $star$ of $M_4(mathbb R)$ which has following form
      beginalign*
      beginpmatrix
      0 & * & 0 & * \
      1 & * & 0 & * \
      0 & * & 0 & * \
      0 & * & 1 & *
      endpmatrix,
      endalign*

      where $*$ can assume any real number. It is also clear for any monic $4^th$ degree real polynomial, we can at least find one realization in $star$ since the upper left block and lower right block can be considered as in companion form. We further concern this set
      beginalign*
      mathcal E = A in star: max_i left( lambda_i(A) right) < 0 .
      endalign*

      In other words, all elements in $mathcal E$ has above defined structure and all eigenvalues on the left open half plane. I am trying to determine whether the set $mathcal E$ is connected.




      My first try was to determine for a fixed monic polynomial, whether all realizations in $star$ is connected. If this is true, for any $A_1, A_2 in mathcal E$, we may first connect them to a companion form in $star$ (by making the $32$ entry to be $1$ and other entries in the second column to be $0$) without changing the eigenvalues, and then the companion forms are connected as a consequence of property of polynomials. But as the question I asked a while ago, this is only true if it has at least one real eigenvalue.



      I strongly believe the set is connected. The question is related but I am not sure it is that related. Because the condition there is much more strict. I was asking to connect all realizations in $star$ yielding the same characteristic equation without changing its eigenvalues. Here we allow this to vary inside $mathcal E$.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let us consider an affine structure $star$ of $M_4(mathbb R)$ which has following form
      beginalign*
      beginpmatrix
      0 & * & 0 & * \
      1 & * & 0 & * \
      0 & * & 0 & * \
      0 & * & 1 & *
      endpmatrix,
      endalign*

      where $*$ can assume any real number. It is also clear for any monic $4^th$ degree real polynomial, we can at least find one realization in $star$ since the upper left block and lower right block can be considered as in companion form. We further concern this set
      beginalign*
      mathcal E = A in star: max_i left( lambda_i(A) right) < 0 .
      endalign*

      In other words, all elements in $mathcal E$ has above defined structure and all eigenvalues on the left open half plane. I am trying to determine whether the set $mathcal E$ is connected.




      My first try was to determine for a fixed monic polynomial, whether all realizations in $star$ is connected. If this is true, for any $A_1, A_2 in mathcal E$, we may first connect them to a companion form in $star$ (by making the $32$ entry to be $1$ and other entries in the second column to be $0$) without changing the eigenvalues, and then the companion forms are connected as a consequence of property of polynomials. But as the question I asked a while ago, this is only true if it has at least one real eigenvalue.



      I strongly believe the set is connected. The question is related but I am not sure it is that related. Because the condition there is much more strict. I was asking to connect all realizations in $star$ yielding the same characteristic equation without changing its eigenvalues. Here we allow this to vary inside $mathcal E$.







      linear-algebra general-topology path-connected






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Feb 12 at 6:52







      MyCindy2012

















      asked Feb 12 at 6:05









      MyCindy2012MyCindy2012

      12911




      12911




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4





          +50







          $begingroup$

          One may prove the set is connected by stability analysis of matrices. In following, I will concern the transpose of $star$ and this does not change the connectedness.



          Note $star approx mathbb R^2 times 4$. Putting $A= pmatrix0 & 1 & 0 & 0\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0$ and $B = pmatrix0 & 0 \ 1 & 0 \0 & 0 \ 0 & 1$, the set $mathcal E$ can be identified by a subset $mathcal F subset mathbb R^2 times 4$ with $mathcal F = X subset mathbb R^2 times 4: A-BX text is stable$.(see definition of stable matrix.) Now by Lyapunov matrix theory, $X in mathcal F$ if and only if there exists some positive definite matrix $P > 0$, such that $(A-BX) P + P(A-BX)^T < 0$ ($< 0$ means negative definite.) A change of variable $Y=XP$ yields
          beginalign
          labeleq:1
          tag$dagger$
          AP + PA^T - BY - Y^TB^T < 0.
          endalign

          Observe the solution set $(P, Y)$ of $dagger$ is a convex set and thus connected. So $mathcal F$ is a continuous image under the map $(P, Y) mapsto YP^-1$.



          This method does not reveal too much of set structure which I think should be very nice. Hope someone can give a more transparent argument.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3109731%2fis-this-subset-of-m-4-mathbb-r-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4





            +50







            $begingroup$

            One may prove the set is connected by stability analysis of matrices. In following, I will concern the transpose of $star$ and this does not change the connectedness.



            Note $star approx mathbb R^2 times 4$. Putting $A= pmatrix0 & 1 & 0 & 0\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0$ and $B = pmatrix0 & 0 \ 1 & 0 \0 & 0 \ 0 & 1$, the set $mathcal E$ can be identified by a subset $mathcal F subset mathbb R^2 times 4$ with $mathcal F = X subset mathbb R^2 times 4: A-BX text is stable$.(see definition of stable matrix.) Now by Lyapunov matrix theory, $X in mathcal F$ if and only if there exists some positive definite matrix $P > 0$, such that $(A-BX) P + P(A-BX)^T < 0$ ($< 0$ means negative definite.) A change of variable $Y=XP$ yields
            beginalign
            labeleq:1
            tag$dagger$
            AP + PA^T - BY - Y^TB^T < 0.
            endalign

            Observe the solution set $(P, Y)$ of $dagger$ is a convex set and thus connected. So $mathcal F$ is a continuous image under the map $(P, Y) mapsto YP^-1$.



            This method does not reveal too much of set structure which I think should be very nice. Hope someone can give a more transparent argument.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              4





              +50







              $begingroup$

              One may prove the set is connected by stability analysis of matrices. In following, I will concern the transpose of $star$ and this does not change the connectedness.



              Note $star approx mathbb R^2 times 4$. Putting $A= pmatrix0 & 1 & 0 & 0\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0$ and $B = pmatrix0 & 0 \ 1 & 0 \0 & 0 \ 0 & 1$, the set $mathcal E$ can be identified by a subset $mathcal F subset mathbb R^2 times 4$ with $mathcal F = X subset mathbb R^2 times 4: A-BX text is stable$.(see definition of stable matrix.) Now by Lyapunov matrix theory, $X in mathcal F$ if and only if there exists some positive definite matrix $P > 0$, such that $(A-BX) P + P(A-BX)^T < 0$ ($< 0$ means negative definite.) A change of variable $Y=XP$ yields
              beginalign
              labeleq:1
              tag$dagger$
              AP + PA^T - BY - Y^TB^T < 0.
              endalign

              Observe the solution set $(P, Y)$ of $dagger$ is a convex set and thus connected. So $mathcal F$ is a continuous image under the map $(P, Y) mapsto YP^-1$.



              This method does not reveal too much of set structure which I think should be very nice. Hope someone can give a more transparent argument.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                4





                +50







                4





                +50



                4




                +50



                $begingroup$

                One may prove the set is connected by stability analysis of matrices. In following, I will concern the transpose of $star$ and this does not change the connectedness.



                Note $star approx mathbb R^2 times 4$. Putting $A= pmatrix0 & 1 & 0 & 0\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0$ and $B = pmatrix0 & 0 \ 1 & 0 \0 & 0 \ 0 & 1$, the set $mathcal E$ can be identified by a subset $mathcal F subset mathbb R^2 times 4$ with $mathcal F = X subset mathbb R^2 times 4: A-BX text is stable$.(see definition of stable matrix.) Now by Lyapunov matrix theory, $X in mathcal F$ if and only if there exists some positive definite matrix $P > 0$, such that $(A-BX) P + P(A-BX)^T < 0$ ($< 0$ means negative definite.) A change of variable $Y=XP$ yields
                beginalign
                labeleq:1
                tag$dagger$
                AP + PA^T - BY - Y^TB^T < 0.
                endalign

                Observe the solution set $(P, Y)$ of $dagger$ is a convex set and thus connected. So $mathcal F$ is a continuous image under the map $(P, Y) mapsto YP^-1$.



                This method does not reveal too much of set structure which I think should be very nice. Hope someone can give a more transparent argument.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                One may prove the set is connected by stability analysis of matrices. In following, I will concern the transpose of $star$ and this does not change the connectedness.



                Note $star approx mathbb R^2 times 4$. Putting $A= pmatrix0 & 1 & 0 & 0\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0$ and $B = pmatrix0 & 0 \ 1 & 0 \0 & 0 \ 0 & 1$, the set $mathcal E$ can be identified by a subset $mathcal F subset mathbb R^2 times 4$ with $mathcal F = X subset mathbb R^2 times 4: A-BX text is stable$.(see definition of stable matrix.) Now by Lyapunov matrix theory, $X in mathcal F$ if and only if there exists some positive definite matrix $P > 0$, such that $(A-BX) P + P(A-BX)^T < 0$ ($< 0$ means negative definite.) A change of variable $Y=XP$ yields
                beginalign
                labeleq:1
                tag$dagger$
                AP + PA^T - BY - Y^TB^T < 0.
                endalign

                Observe the solution set $(P, Y)$ of $dagger$ is a convex set and thus connected. So $mathcal F$ is a continuous image under the map $(P, Y) mapsto YP^-1$.



                This method does not reveal too much of set structure which I think should be very nice. Hope someone can give a more transparent argument.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Mar 21 at 16:55

























                answered Feb 14 at 17:39









                user1101010user1101010

                9011830




                9011830



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3109731%2fis-this-subset-of-m-4-mathbb-r-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye