logical propositions $left [ left ( prightarrow -q right ) wedge left ( -rvee q right )wedge rright ]rightarrow -p$ [on hold]Logic Question : $C rightarrow(Bwedge A) = F , Alongleftrightarrow(Bwedge C) = T$ Find $Brightarrow (neg C) $proving logical equivalence $(P leftrightarrow Q) equiv (P wedge Q) vee (neg P wedge neg Q)$Showthat $mathrm p leftrightarrow mathrm q$ and $(mathrm pwedge mathrm q) vee (neg mathrm p wedge neg mathrm q)$ are logically equivalentPropositional Logic Help: $(neg p wedge (p vee q)) rightarrow q $ is a tautologyShow equivalence of statement $left(Prightarrow Qright) wedge left(Qrightarrow Rright)$ to …Logical Reasoning $(neg p vee neg q) wedge (r vee q) wedge (r implies s) implies neg(p wedge neg s)$How do you determine an interpretation and a model for $left((x wedge y) rightarrow (x vee y)right)$?Is the set $tau := leftvee, wedge, 0right$ adequate? Prove your answerlogical propositions $left ( left ( pRightarrow q right )Leftrightarrow p right )iff p wedge q$propositional logic $left [ left ( prightarrow q right )wedge left ( rrightarrow s right ) right ]$

Who is our nearest neighbor

Is a lawful good "antagonist" effective?

Does anyone draw a parallel between Haman selling himself to Mordechai and Esav selling the birthright to Yaakov?

Can you reject a postdoc offer after the PI has paid a large sum for flights/accommodation for your visit?

If the Captain's screens are out, does he switch seats with the co-pilot?

How can I discourage/prevent PCs from using door choke-points?

Can infringement of a trademark be pursued for using a company's name in a sentence?

My adviser wants to be the first author

What is the dot in “1.2.4."

Playing ONE triplet (not three)

Identifying the interval from A♭ to D♯

How does Dispel Magic work against Stoneskin?

Is having access to past exams cheating and, if yes, could it be proven just by a good grade?

What is the blue range indicating on this manifold pressure gauge?

When two POV characters meet

Draw arrow on sides of triangle

What is the definition of "Natural Selection"?

Question about partial fractions with irreducible quadratic factors

If Invisibility ends because the original caster casts a non-concentration spell, does Invisibility also end on other targets of the original casting?

US to Europe trip with Montreal layover - is 52 minutes enough?

Sword in the Stone story where the sword was held in place by electromagnets

Extension of Splitting Fields over An Arbitrary Field

"However" used in a conditional clause?

Is "history" a male-biased word ("his+story")?



logical propositions $left [ left ( prightarrow -q right ) wedge left ( -rvee q right )wedge rright ]rightarrow -p$ [on hold]


Logic Question : $C rightarrow(Bwedge A) = F , Alongleftrightarrow(Bwedge C) = T$ Find $Brightarrow (neg C) $proving logical equivalence $(P leftrightarrow Q) equiv (P wedge Q) vee (neg P wedge neg Q)$Showthat $mathrm p leftrightarrow mathrm q$ and $(mathrm pwedge mathrm q) vee (neg mathrm p wedge neg mathrm q)$ are logically equivalentPropositional Logic Help: $(neg p wedge (p vee q)) rightarrow q $ is a tautologyShow equivalence of statement $left(Prightarrow Qright) wedge left(Qrightarrow Rright)$ to …Logical Reasoning $(neg p vee neg q) wedge (r vee q) wedge (r implies s) implies neg(p wedge neg s)$How do you determine an interpretation and a model for $left((x wedge y) rightarrow (x vee y)right)$?Is the set $tau := leftvee, wedge, 0right$ adequate? Prove your answerlogical propositions $left ( left ( pRightarrow q right )Leftrightarrow p right )iff p wedge q$propositional logic $left [ left ( prightarrow q right )wedge left ( rrightarrow s right ) right ]$













-1












$begingroup$


I need help in this exercise because I got stuck and could not get to the solution, someone could give me a clue how to continue or finish it, please(without using truth table)



$$left [ left ( prightarrow -q right ) wedge left ( -rvee q right )wedge rright ]rightarrow -p$$



this is what i have










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 21:17











  • $begingroup$
    yes, i have that in my development :D
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:24










  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ is equivalent to $q rightarrow -p$ and $(-r lor q)$ is equivalent to $r rightarrow q$ If you piece these together $r$ and use Modus Ponens twice, you should have what you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Massé
    Mar 10 at 21:26










  • $begingroup$
    Bernard Massé if i cuold put you a vote up i would do it, but i cant so thanks you.
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 22:03















-1












$begingroup$


I need help in this exercise because I got stuck and could not get to the solution, someone could give me a clue how to continue or finish it, please(without using truth table)



$$left [ left ( prightarrow -q right ) wedge left ( -rvee q right )wedge rright ]rightarrow -p$$



this is what i have










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 21:17











  • $begingroup$
    yes, i have that in my development :D
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:24










  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ is equivalent to $q rightarrow -p$ and $(-r lor q)$ is equivalent to $r rightarrow q$ If you piece these together $r$ and use Modus Ponens twice, you should have what you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Massé
    Mar 10 at 21:26










  • $begingroup$
    Bernard Massé if i cuold put you a vote up i would do it, but i cant so thanks you.
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 22:03













-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


I need help in this exercise because I got stuck and could not get to the solution, someone could give me a clue how to continue or finish it, please(without using truth table)



$$left [ left ( prightarrow -q right ) wedge left ( -rvee q right )wedge rright ]rightarrow -p$$



this is what i have










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I need help in this exercise because I got stuck and could not get to the solution, someone could give me a clue how to continue or finish it, please(without using truth table)



$$left [ left ( prightarrow -q right ) wedge left ( -rvee q right )wedge rright ]rightarrow -p$$



this is what i have







logic boolean-algebra






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Graham Kemp

86.7k43579




86.7k43579






New contributor




lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Mar 10 at 21:03









lucaslucas

63




63




New contributor




lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 21:17











  • $begingroup$
    yes, i have that in my development :D
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:24










  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ is equivalent to $q rightarrow -p$ and $(-r lor q)$ is equivalent to $r rightarrow q$ If you piece these together $r$ and use Modus Ponens twice, you should have what you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Massé
    Mar 10 at 21:26










  • $begingroup$
    Bernard Massé if i cuold put you a vote up i would do it, but i cant so thanks you.
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 22:03
















  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 21:17











  • $begingroup$
    yes, i have that in my development :D
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:24










  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ is equivalent to $q rightarrow -p$ and $(-r lor q)$ is equivalent to $r rightarrow q$ If you piece these together $r$ and use Modus Ponens twice, you should have what you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Massé
    Mar 10 at 21:26










  • $begingroup$
    Bernard Massé if i cuold put you a vote up i would do it, but i cant so thanks you.
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 22:03















$begingroup$
$p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 10 at 21:17





$begingroup$
$p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 10 at 21:17













$begingroup$
yes, i have that in my development :D
$endgroup$
– lucas
Mar 10 at 21:24




$begingroup$
yes, i have that in my development :D
$endgroup$
– lucas
Mar 10 at 21:24












$begingroup$
$p rightarrow -q$ is equivalent to $q rightarrow -p$ and $(-r lor q)$ is equivalent to $r rightarrow q$ If you piece these together $r$ and use Modus Ponens twice, you should have what you want.
$endgroup$
– Bernard Massé
Mar 10 at 21:26




$begingroup$
$p rightarrow -q$ is equivalent to $q rightarrow -p$ and $(-r lor q)$ is equivalent to $r rightarrow q$ If you piece these together $r$ and use Modus Ponens twice, you should have what you want.
$endgroup$
– Bernard Massé
Mar 10 at 21:26












$begingroup$
Bernard Massé if i cuold put you a vote up i would do it, but i cant so thanks you.
$endgroup$
– lucas
Mar 10 at 22:03




$begingroup$
Bernard Massé if i cuold put you a vote up i would do it, but i cant so thanks you.
$endgroup$
– lucas
Mar 10 at 22:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

$p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$



$-p lor -q$ and $q land r$ means $-p$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    i dont understand why −p∨−q and q∧r means −p ? :C
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    Because $-q land q$ is a contradiction so we have $-p land q$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 22:09

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

$p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$



$-p lor -q$ and $q land r$ means $-p$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    i dont understand why −p∨−q and q∧r means −p ? :C
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    Because $-q land q$ is a contradiction so we have $-p land q$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 22:09















0












$begingroup$

$p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$



$-p lor -q$ and $q land r$ means $-p$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    i dont understand why −p∨−q and q∧r means −p ? :C
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    Because $-q land q$ is a contradiction so we have $-p land q$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 22:09













0












0








0





$begingroup$

$p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$



$-p lor -q$ and $q land r$ means $-p$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



$p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$



$-p lor -q$ and $q land r$ means $-p$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 10 at 21:24









J. W. TannerJ. W. Tanner

3,2301320




3,2301320











  • $begingroup$
    i dont understand why −p∨−q and q∧r means −p ? :C
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    Because $-q land q$ is a contradiction so we have $-p land q$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 22:09
















  • $begingroup$
    i dont understand why −p∨−q and q∧r means −p ? :C
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    Because $-q land q$ is a contradiction so we have $-p land q$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 22:09















$begingroup$
i dont understand why −p∨−q and q∧r means −p ? :C
$endgroup$
– lucas
Mar 10 at 21:31




$begingroup$
i dont understand why −p∨−q and q∧r means −p ? :C
$endgroup$
– lucas
Mar 10 at 21:31












$begingroup$
Because $-q land q$ is a contradiction so we have $-p land q$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 10 at 22:09




$begingroup$
Because $-q land q$ is a contradiction so we have $-p land q$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 10 at 22:09



Popular posts from this blog

Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers