logical propositions $left [ left ( prightarrow -q right ) wedge left ( -rvee q right )wedge rright ]rightarrow -p$ [on hold]Logic Question : $C rightarrow(Bwedge A) = F , Alongleftrightarrow(Bwedge C) = T$ Find $Brightarrow (neg C) $proving logical equivalence $(P leftrightarrow Q) equiv (P wedge Q) vee (neg P wedge neg Q)$Showthat $mathrm p leftrightarrow mathrm q$ and $(mathrm pwedge mathrm q) vee (neg mathrm p wedge neg mathrm q)$ are logically equivalentPropositional Logic Help: $(neg p wedge (p vee q)) rightarrow q $ is a tautologyShow equivalence of statement $left(Prightarrow Qright) wedge left(Qrightarrow Rright)$ to …Logical Reasoning $(neg p vee neg q) wedge (r vee q) wedge (r implies s) implies neg(p wedge neg s)$How do you determine an interpretation and a model for $left((x wedge y) rightarrow (x vee y)right)$?Is the set $tau := leftvee, wedge, 0right$ adequate? Prove your answerlogical propositions $left ( left ( pRightarrow q right )Leftrightarrow p right )iff p wedge q$propositional logic $left [ left ( prightarrow q right )wedge left ( rrightarrow s right ) right ]$

Who is our nearest neighbor

Is a lawful good "antagonist" effective?

Does anyone draw a parallel between Haman selling himself to Mordechai and Esav selling the birthright to Yaakov?

Can you reject a postdoc offer after the PI has paid a large sum for flights/accommodation for your visit?

If the Captain's screens are out, does he switch seats with the co-pilot?

How can I discourage/prevent PCs from using door choke-points?

Can infringement of a trademark be pursued for using a company's name in a sentence?

My adviser wants to be the first author

What is the dot in “1.2.4."

Playing ONE triplet (not three)

Identifying the interval from A♭ to D♯

How does Dispel Magic work against Stoneskin?

Is having access to past exams cheating and, if yes, could it be proven just by a good grade?

What is the blue range indicating on this manifold pressure gauge?

When two POV characters meet

Draw arrow on sides of triangle

What is the definition of "Natural Selection"?

Question about partial fractions with irreducible quadratic factors

If Invisibility ends because the original caster casts a non-concentration spell, does Invisibility also end on other targets of the original casting?

US to Europe trip with Montreal layover - is 52 minutes enough?

Sword in the Stone story where the sword was held in place by electromagnets

Extension of Splitting Fields over An Arbitrary Field

"However" used in a conditional clause?

Is "history" a male-biased word ("his+story")?



logical propositions $left [ left ( prightarrow -q right ) wedge left ( -rvee q right )wedge rright ]rightarrow -p$ [on hold]


Logic Question : $C rightarrow(Bwedge A) = F , Alongleftrightarrow(Bwedge C) = T$ Find $Brightarrow (neg C) $proving logical equivalence $(P leftrightarrow Q) equiv (P wedge Q) vee (neg P wedge neg Q)$Showthat $mathrm p leftrightarrow mathrm q$ and $(mathrm pwedge mathrm q) vee (neg mathrm p wedge neg mathrm q)$ are logically equivalentPropositional Logic Help: $(neg p wedge (p vee q)) rightarrow q $ is a tautologyShow equivalence of statement $left(Prightarrow Qright) wedge left(Qrightarrow Rright)$ to …Logical Reasoning $(neg p vee neg q) wedge (r vee q) wedge (r implies s) implies neg(p wedge neg s)$How do you determine an interpretation and a model for $left((x wedge y) rightarrow (x vee y)right)$?Is the set $tau := leftvee, wedge, 0right$ adequate? Prove your answerlogical propositions $left ( left ( pRightarrow q right )Leftrightarrow p right )iff p wedge q$propositional logic $left [ left ( prightarrow q right )wedge left ( rrightarrow s right ) right ]$













-1












$begingroup$


I need help in this exercise because I got stuck and could not get to the solution, someone could give me a clue how to continue or finish it, please(without using truth table)



$$left [ left ( prightarrow -q right ) wedge left ( -rvee q right )wedge rright ]rightarrow -p$$



this is what i have










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 21:17











  • $begingroup$
    yes, i have that in my development :D
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:24










  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ is equivalent to $q rightarrow -p$ and $(-r lor q)$ is equivalent to $r rightarrow q$ If you piece these together $r$ and use Modus Ponens twice, you should have what you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Massé
    Mar 10 at 21:26










  • $begingroup$
    Bernard Massé if i cuold put you a vote up i would do it, but i cant so thanks you.
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 22:03















-1












$begingroup$


I need help in this exercise because I got stuck and could not get to the solution, someone could give me a clue how to continue or finish it, please(without using truth table)



$$left [ left ( prightarrow -q right ) wedge left ( -rvee q right )wedge rright ]rightarrow -p$$



this is what i have










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$



put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.















  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 21:17











  • $begingroup$
    yes, i have that in my development :D
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:24










  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ is equivalent to $q rightarrow -p$ and $(-r lor q)$ is equivalent to $r rightarrow q$ If you piece these together $r$ and use Modus Ponens twice, you should have what you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Massé
    Mar 10 at 21:26










  • $begingroup$
    Bernard Massé if i cuold put you a vote up i would do it, but i cant so thanks you.
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 22:03













-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


I need help in this exercise because I got stuck and could not get to the solution, someone could give me a clue how to continue or finish it, please(without using truth table)



$$left [ left ( prightarrow -q right ) wedge left ( -rvee q right )wedge rright ]rightarrow -p$$



this is what i have










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I need help in this exercise because I got stuck and could not get to the solution, someone could give me a clue how to continue or finish it, please(without using truth table)



$$left [ left ( prightarrow -q right ) wedge left ( -rvee q right )wedge rright ]rightarrow -p$$



this is what i have







logic boolean-algebra






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Graham Kemp

86.7k43579




86.7k43579






New contributor




lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Mar 10 at 21:03









lucaslucas

63




63




New contributor




lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






lucas is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







put on hold as off-topic by Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Carl Mummert, Jyrki Lahtonen, Cesareo, Gibbs, Parcly Taxel
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 21:17











  • $begingroup$
    yes, i have that in my development :D
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:24










  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ is equivalent to $q rightarrow -p$ and $(-r lor q)$ is equivalent to $r rightarrow q$ If you piece these together $r$ and use Modus Ponens twice, you should have what you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Massé
    Mar 10 at 21:26










  • $begingroup$
    Bernard Massé if i cuold put you a vote up i would do it, but i cant so thanks you.
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 22:03
















  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 21:17











  • $begingroup$
    yes, i have that in my development :D
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:24










  • $begingroup$
    $p rightarrow -q$ is equivalent to $q rightarrow -p$ and $(-r lor q)$ is equivalent to $r rightarrow q$ If you piece these together $r$ and use Modus Ponens twice, you should have what you want.
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Massé
    Mar 10 at 21:26










  • $begingroup$
    Bernard Massé if i cuold put you a vote up i would do it, but i cant so thanks you.
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 22:03















$begingroup$
$p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 10 at 21:17





$begingroup$
$p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 10 at 21:17













$begingroup$
yes, i have that in my development :D
$endgroup$
– lucas
Mar 10 at 21:24




$begingroup$
yes, i have that in my development :D
$endgroup$
– lucas
Mar 10 at 21:24












$begingroup$
$p rightarrow -q$ is equivalent to $q rightarrow -p$ and $(-r lor q)$ is equivalent to $r rightarrow q$ If you piece these together $r$ and use Modus Ponens twice, you should have what you want.
$endgroup$
– Bernard Massé
Mar 10 at 21:26




$begingroup$
$p rightarrow -q$ is equivalent to $q rightarrow -p$ and $(-r lor q)$ is equivalent to $r rightarrow q$ If you piece these together $r$ and use Modus Ponens twice, you should have what you want.
$endgroup$
– Bernard Massé
Mar 10 at 21:26












$begingroup$
Bernard Massé if i cuold put you a vote up i would do it, but i cant so thanks you.
$endgroup$
– lucas
Mar 10 at 22:03




$begingroup$
Bernard Massé if i cuold put you a vote up i would do it, but i cant so thanks you.
$endgroup$
– lucas
Mar 10 at 22:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

$p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$



$-p lor -q$ and $q land r$ means $-p$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    i dont understand why −p∨−q and q∧r means −p ? :C
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    Because $-q land q$ is a contradiction so we have $-p land q$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 22:09

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

$p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$



$-p lor -q$ and $q land r$ means $-p$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    i dont understand why −p∨−q and q∧r means −p ? :C
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    Because $-q land q$ is a contradiction so we have $-p land q$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 22:09















0












$begingroup$

$p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$



$-p lor -q$ and $q land r$ means $-p$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    i dont understand why −p∨−q and q∧r means −p ? :C
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    Because $-q land q$ is a contradiction so we have $-p land q$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 22:09













0












0








0





$begingroup$

$p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$



$-p lor -q$ and $q land r$ means $-p$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



$p rightarrow -q$ means $-p lor -q$ and $(-r lor q) land r$ means $q land r$



$-p lor -q$ and $q land r$ means $-p$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 10 at 21:24









J. W. TannerJ. W. Tanner

3,2301320




3,2301320











  • $begingroup$
    i dont understand why −p∨−q and q∧r means −p ? :C
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    Because $-q land q$ is a contradiction so we have $-p land q$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 22:09
















  • $begingroup$
    i dont understand why −p∨−q and q∧r means −p ? :C
    $endgroup$
    – lucas
    Mar 10 at 21:31










  • $begingroup$
    Because $-q land q$ is a contradiction so we have $-p land q$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Mar 10 at 22:09















$begingroup$
i dont understand why −p∨−q and q∧r means −p ? :C
$endgroup$
– lucas
Mar 10 at 21:31




$begingroup$
i dont understand why −p∨−q and q∧r means −p ? :C
$endgroup$
– lucas
Mar 10 at 21:31












$begingroup$
Because $-q land q$ is a contradiction so we have $-p land q$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 10 at 22:09




$begingroup$
Because $-q land q$ is a contradiction so we have $-p land q$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Mar 10 at 22:09



Popular posts from this blog

Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

John Burke, 9th Earl of Clanricarde References Navigation menuA General and heraldic dictionary of the peerage and baronetage of the British EmpireLeigh Rayment's Peerage Pages

Football at the 1986 Brunei Merdeka Games Contents Teams Group stage Knockout stage References Navigation menu"Brunei Merdeka Games 1986".