Bipartite graph $G=(A,B)$ with $delta(A)=3n/2$ and no $C_4$ has a matching which saturate each vertex in $A$.Show that a finite regular bipartite graph has a perfect matchingShowing a bipartite graph has a perfect matching.bipartite graph has perfect matchingEdge and vertex connectivity of bipartite graphMatching in a bipartite graphMatching in bipartite graphProof bipartite graph matchingIf graph G is bipartite with largest vertex degree $Delta$(G) , then $chi'(G)$ = $Delta$(G)Maximum matching for bipartite graphHow would we prove that the following bipartite graph has a perfect matching?
what does the apostrophe mean in this notation?
How do anti-virus programs start at Windows boot?
Time travel short story where dinosaur doesn't taste like chicken
Why would a jet engine that runs at temps excess of 2000°C burn when it crashes?
Deleting missing values from a dataset
Decoding assembly instructions in a Game Boy disassembler
Playing ONE triplet (not three)
Coworker uses her breast-pump everywhere in the office
Is "history" a male-biased word ("his+story")?
What Happens when Passenger Refuses to Fly Boeing 737 Max?
Is going from continuous data to categorical always wrong?
Time dilation for a moving electronic clock
Question about partial fractions with irreducible quadratic factors
What to do when during a meeting client people start to fight (even physically) with each others?
This equation is outside the page, how to modify it
Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?
Making a sword in the stone, in a medieval world without magic
Examples of odd-dimensional manifolds that do not admit contact structure
What happens with multiple copies of Humility and Glorious Anthem on the battlefield?
Does splitting a potentially monolithic application into several smaller ones help prevent bugs?
What is the blue range indicating on this manifold pressure gauge?
How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?
Potentiometer like component
Who is our nearest neighbor
Bipartite graph $G=(A,B)$ with $delta(A)=3n/2$ and no $C_4$ has a matching which saturate each vertex in $A$.
Show that a finite regular bipartite graph has a perfect matchingShowing a bipartite graph has a perfect matching.bipartite graph has perfect matchingEdge and vertex connectivity of bipartite graphMatching in a bipartite graphMatching in bipartite graphProof bipartite graph matchingIf graph G is bipartite with largest vertex degree $Delta$(G) , then $chi'(G)$ = $Delta$(G)Maximum matching for bipartite graphHow would we prove that the following bipartite graph has a perfect matching?
$begingroup$
Say $G$ is a bipartite graph with bipartition $(A,B)$ and $G$ is $C_4$-free. Prove that if every vertex in $A$ has degree at least $frac32 n$ and $|A|leq n^2$, then $G$ has a matching which uses every vertex in $A$.
My proof:
Use the Hall marriage theorem. Take any $Xsubseteq A$ and let $|X|=k$. Also let $Y=N(X)$ and $|Y|=l$. Let us prove that $lgeq k$. Assume that $l<k$.
Let $Y^*$ be a set of all unordered pairs $y_i,y_j$, $ine j$ of elements in $Y$, and connect a pair $y_i,y_j$ with $xin X$ iff both $y_i$ and $y_j$ are adjacent with $x$ in $G$. Then the degree of each pair in this new bipartite graph $G^*$ (on vertex set $X cup Y^*$) is at most $1$ (since there is no $C_4$ in $G$) and the degree of each $xin X$ is at least $displaystyle3nover 2choose 2$. So we have $$kcdot 3nover 2choose 2leq lchoose 2 .$$
Since we assume $l<k$ we have $$3nover 2choose 2< k-1over 2$$ so $$3n(3n-2)over 4 < k-1 .$$ Since $kleq n^2$ we have $$3n(3n-2) leq 4n^2-8$$so
$$5n^2leq 6n-8$$ which is obviously not true.
Edit: After Darij's confirmation that the proof is correct, I'm will award any solution with better bound than $delta (G)=nsqrt2$ (instead of $3n/2$).
combinatorics discrete-mathematics proof-verification graph-theory
$endgroup$
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from Maria Mazur ending ending at 2019-03-17 18:50:50Z">in 4 days.
Looking for an answer drawing from credible and/or official sources.
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Say $G$ is a bipartite graph with bipartition $(A,B)$ and $G$ is $C_4$-free. Prove that if every vertex in $A$ has degree at least $frac32 n$ and $|A|leq n^2$, then $G$ has a matching which uses every vertex in $A$.
My proof:
Use the Hall marriage theorem. Take any $Xsubseteq A$ and let $|X|=k$. Also let $Y=N(X)$ and $|Y|=l$. Let us prove that $lgeq k$. Assume that $l<k$.
Let $Y^*$ be a set of all unordered pairs $y_i,y_j$, $ine j$ of elements in $Y$, and connect a pair $y_i,y_j$ with $xin X$ iff both $y_i$ and $y_j$ are adjacent with $x$ in $G$. Then the degree of each pair in this new bipartite graph $G^*$ (on vertex set $X cup Y^*$) is at most $1$ (since there is no $C_4$ in $G$) and the degree of each $xin X$ is at least $displaystyle3nover 2choose 2$. So we have $$kcdot 3nover 2choose 2leq lchoose 2 .$$
Since we assume $l<k$ we have $$3nover 2choose 2< k-1over 2$$ so $$3n(3n-2)over 4 < k-1 .$$ Since $kleq n^2$ we have $$3n(3n-2) leq 4n^2-8$$so
$$5n^2leq 6n-8$$ which is obviously not true.
Edit: After Darij's confirmation that the proof is correct, I'm will award any solution with better bound than $delta (G)=nsqrt2$ (instead of $3n/2$).
combinatorics discrete-mathematics proof-verification graph-theory
$endgroup$
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from Maria Mazur ending ending at 2019-03-17 18:50:50Z">in 4 days.
Looking for an answer drawing from credible and/or official sources.
$begingroup$
How exactly do you prove this for $n$ instead of $3n/2$ ? I don't get the inequalities to product a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
We are talking now about $delta = 3n/2$ or $n$?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I am talking about $n$.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yes, I see. My bad. Anyway, is the rest correct?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The rest is correct. You may want to compute the optimal bound for your proof to work; I'm pretty sure it falls closer to $n$ than to $3n/2$.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Say $G$ is a bipartite graph with bipartition $(A,B)$ and $G$ is $C_4$-free. Prove that if every vertex in $A$ has degree at least $frac32 n$ and $|A|leq n^2$, then $G$ has a matching which uses every vertex in $A$.
My proof:
Use the Hall marriage theorem. Take any $Xsubseteq A$ and let $|X|=k$. Also let $Y=N(X)$ and $|Y|=l$. Let us prove that $lgeq k$. Assume that $l<k$.
Let $Y^*$ be a set of all unordered pairs $y_i,y_j$, $ine j$ of elements in $Y$, and connect a pair $y_i,y_j$ with $xin X$ iff both $y_i$ and $y_j$ are adjacent with $x$ in $G$. Then the degree of each pair in this new bipartite graph $G^*$ (on vertex set $X cup Y^*$) is at most $1$ (since there is no $C_4$ in $G$) and the degree of each $xin X$ is at least $displaystyle3nover 2choose 2$. So we have $$kcdot 3nover 2choose 2leq lchoose 2 .$$
Since we assume $l<k$ we have $$3nover 2choose 2< k-1over 2$$ so $$3n(3n-2)over 4 < k-1 .$$ Since $kleq n^2$ we have $$3n(3n-2) leq 4n^2-8$$so
$$5n^2leq 6n-8$$ which is obviously not true.
Edit: After Darij's confirmation that the proof is correct, I'm will award any solution with better bound than $delta (G)=nsqrt2$ (instead of $3n/2$).
combinatorics discrete-mathematics proof-verification graph-theory
$endgroup$
Say $G$ is a bipartite graph with bipartition $(A,B)$ and $G$ is $C_4$-free. Prove that if every vertex in $A$ has degree at least $frac32 n$ and $|A|leq n^2$, then $G$ has a matching which uses every vertex in $A$.
My proof:
Use the Hall marriage theorem. Take any $Xsubseteq A$ and let $|X|=k$. Also let $Y=N(X)$ and $|Y|=l$. Let us prove that $lgeq k$. Assume that $l<k$.
Let $Y^*$ be a set of all unordered pairs $y_i,y_j$, $ine j$ of elements in $Y$, and connect a pair $y_i,y_j$ with $xin X$ iff both $y_i$ and $y_j$ are adjacent with $x$ in $G$. Then the degree of each pair in this new bipartite graph $G^*$ (on vertex set $X cup Y^*$) is at most $1$ (since there is no $C_4$ in $G$) and the degree of each $xin X$ is at least $displaystyle3nover 2choose 2$. So we have $$kcdot 3nover 2choose 2leq lchoose 2 .$$
Since we assume $l<k$ we have $$3nover 2choose 2< k-1over 2$$ so $$3n(3n-2)over 4 < k-1 .$$ Since $kleq n^2$ we have $$3n(3n-2) leq 4n^2-8$$so
$$5n^2leq 6n-8$$ which is obviously not true.
Edit: After Darij's confirmation that the proof is correct, I'm will award any solution with better bound than $delta (G)=nsqrt2$ (instead of $3n/2$).
combinatorics discrete-mathematics proof-verification graph-theory
combinatorics discrete-mathematics proof-verification graph-theory
edited 12 hours ago
Maria Mazur
asked May 25 '18 at 15:10
Maria MazurMaria Mazur
46.7k1260120
46.7k1260120
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from Maria Mazur ending ending at 2019-03-17 18:50:50Z">in 4 days.
Looking for an answer drawing from credible and/or official sources.
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from Maria Mazur ending ending at 2019-03-17 18:50:50Z">in 4 days.
Looking for an answer drawing from credible and/or official sources.
$begingroup$
How exactly do you prove this for $n$ instead of $3n/2$ ? I don't get the inequalities to product a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
We are talking now about $delta = 3n/2$ or $n$?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I am talking about $n$.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yes, I see. My bad. Anyway, is the rest correct?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The rest is correct. You may want to compute the optimal bound for your proof to work; I'm pretty sure it falls closer to $n$ than to $3n/2$.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
How exactly do you prove this for $n$ instead of $3n/2$ ? I don't get the inequalities to product a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
We are talking now about $delta = 3n/2$ or $n$?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I am talking about $n$.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yes, I see. My bad. Anyway, is the rest correct?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The rest is correct. You may want to compute the optimal bound for your proof to work; I'm pretty sure it falls closer to $n$ than to $3n/2$.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
How exactly do you prove this for $n$ instead of $3n/2$ ? I don't get the inequalities to product a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
How exactly do you prove this for $n$ instead of $3n/2$ ? I don't get the inequalities to product a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
We are talking now about $delta = 3n/2$ or $n$?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
We are talking now about $delta = 3n/2$ or $n$?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I am talking about $n$.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I am talking about $n$.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yes, I see. My bad. Anyway, is the rest correct?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yes, I see. My bad. Anyway, is the rest correct?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The rest is correct. You may want to compute the optimal bound for your proof to work; I'm pretty sure it falls closer to $n$ than to $3n/2$.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The rest is correct. You may want to compute the optimal bound for your proof to work; I'm pretty sure it falls closer to $n$ than to $3n/2$.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
|
show 2 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2795765%2fbipartite-graph-g-a-b-with-deltaa-3n-2-and-no-c-4-has-a-matching-whic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2795765%2fbipartite-graph-g-a-b-with-deltaa-3n-2-and-no-c-4-has-a-matching-whic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
How exactly do you prove this for $n$ instead of $3n/2$ ? I don't get the inequalities to product a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
We are talking now about $delta = 3n/2$ or $n$?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I am talking about $n$.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yes, I see. My bad. Anyway, is the rest correct?
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
The rest is correct. You may want to compute the optimal bound for your proof to work; I'm pretty sure it falls closer to $n$ than to $3n/2$.
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
2 days ago