Evaluate $lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1$?How do I evaluate $lim_h to infty e^h(1-s)$?A Gamma limit $lim_nrightarrow+inftysum_k=1^n left( Gammabigl(fracknbigr)right)^-k=frace^gammae^gamma-1$Evaluate the following limit of finite sumdividing expressions with limitsEuler Limit with -1 to infinity?Formal way to evaluate this limitEvaluate $lim_x to -infty ln(-x^3+x)$Limit of composite functionWhy does the following not show $zeta(0) = -frac12$?limit of Integral of product of convergent functions
How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?
What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?
Define, (actually define) the "stability" and "energy" of a compound
Opacity of an object in 2.8
Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats
Look at your watch and tell me what time is it. vs Look at your watch and tell me what time it is
Are there verbs that are neither telic, or atelic?
Is it possible to upcast ritual spells?
What is the rarity of this homebrew magic staff?
How to change two letters closest to a string and one letter immediately after a string using notepad++
Sailing the cryptic seas
How to read the value of this capacitor?
How to simplify this time periods definition interface?
How to use of "the" before known matrices
Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?
What approach do we need to follow for projects without a test environment?
What options are left, if Britain cannot decide?
Charles Hockett - 'F' article?
Unexpected result from ArcLength
How could a scammer know the apps on my phone / iTunes account?
How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?
How Could an Airship Be Repaired Mid-Flight
Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work
How to create the Curved texte?
Evaluate $lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1$?
How do I evaluate $lim_h to infty e^h(1-s)$?A Gamma limit $lim_nrightarrow+inftysum_k=1^n left( Gammabigl(fracknbigr)right)^-k=frace^gammae^gamma-1$Evaluate the following limit of finite sumdividing expressions with limitsEuler Limit with -1 to infinity?Formal way to evaluate this limitEvaluate $lim_x to -infty ln(-x^3+x)$Limit of composite functionWhy does the following not show $zeta(0) = -frac12$?limit of Integral of product of convergent functions
$begingroup$
Evaluate $lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1?$
I have two solutions for this problem and both of them look valid to me, even though one of them is incorrect.
Firstly, I know that $(2x+1)$ is an odd number, so the limit will be positive infinity when $x$ takes an even number, and limit will be negative infinity when $x$ takes an odd number. Therefore, the limit does not exist.
On the other hand, if I perform some mathematical operations on the function:
$$lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1=lim_xto inftybigl((-3)^2bigr)^xcdot(-3)=lim_xto infty9^xcdot(-3)=-9^infty=-infty$$
Where am I making a mistake on my second attempt?
calculus limits
$endgroup$
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
Evaluate $lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1?$
I have two solutions for this problem and both of them look valid to me, even though one of them is incorrect.
Firstly, I know that $(2x+1)$ is an odd number, so the limit will be positive infinity when $x$ takes an even number, and limit will be negative infinity when $x$ takes an odd number. Therefore, the limit does not exist.
On the other hand, if I perform some mathematical operations on the function:
$$lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1=lim_xto inftybigl((-3)^2bigr)^xcdot(-3)=lim_xto infty9^xcdot(-3)=-9^infty=-infty$$
Where am I making a mistake on my second attempt?
calculus limits
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:21
$begingroup$
There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:22
1
$begingroup$
$x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 11 at 19:28
1
$begingroup$
"There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 11 at 19:40
1
$begingroup$
You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^2x$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Liu
Mar 11 at 20:03
|
show 7 more comments
$begingroup$
Evaluate $lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1?$
I have two solutions for this problem and both of them look valid to me, even though one of them is incorrect.
Firstly, I know that $(2x+1)$ is an odd number, so the limit will be positive infinity when $x$ takes an even number, and limit will be negative infinity when $x$ takes an odd number. Therefore, the limit does not exist.
On the other hand, if I perform some mathematical operations on the function:
$$lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1=lim_xto inftybigl((-3)^2bigr)^xcdot(-3)=lim_xto infty9^xcdot(-3)=-9^infty=-infty$$
Where am I making a mistake on my second attempt?
calculus limits
$endgroup$
Evaluate $lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1?$
I have two solutions for this problem and both of them look valid to me, even though one of them is incorrect.
Firstly, I know that $(2x+1)$ is an odd number, so the limit will be positive infinity when $x$ takes an even number, and limit will be negative infinity when $x$ takes an odd number. Therefore, the limit does not exist.
On the other hand, if I perform some mathematical operations on the function:
$$lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1=lim_xto inftybigl((-3)^2bigr)^xcdot(-3)=lim_xto infty9^xcdot(-3)=-9^infty=-infty$$
Where am I making a mistake on my second attempt?
calculus limits
calculus limits
edited Mar 11 at 20:07
Eldar Rahimli
asked Mar 11 at 19:19
Eldar RahimliEldar Rahimli
35110
35110
2
$begingroup$
Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:21
$begingroup$
There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:22
1
$begingroup$
$x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 11 at 19:28
1
$begingroup$
"There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 11 at 19:40
1
$begingroup$
You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^2x$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Liu
Mar 11 at 20:03
|
show 7 more comments
2
$begingroup$
Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:21
$begingroup$
There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:22
1
$begingroup$
$x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 11 at 19:28
1
$begingroup$
"There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 11 at 19:40
1
$begingroup$
You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^2x$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Liu
Mar 11 at 20:03
2
2
$begingroup$
Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:21
$begingroup$
Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:21
$begingroup$
There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:22
$begingroup$
There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:22
1
1
$begingroup$
$x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 11 at 19:28
$begingroup$
$x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 11 at 19:28
1
1
$begingroup$
"There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 11 at 19:40
$begingroup$
"There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 11 at 19:40
1
1
$begingroup$
You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^2x$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Liu
Mar 11 at 20:03
$begingroup$
You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^2x$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Liu
Mar 11 at 20:03
|
show 7 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.
So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^2x+1$ is strictly negative.
If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32
$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144110%2fevaluate-lim-x-to-infty-32x1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.
So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^2x+1$ is strictly negative.
If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32
$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.
So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^2x+1$ is strictly negative.
If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32
$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.
So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^2x+1$ is strictly negative.
If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.
$endgroup$
A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.
So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^2x+1$ is strictly negative.
If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.
edited Mar 11 at 19:35
answered Mar 11 at 19:24
ArthurArthur
118k7117200
118k7117200
$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32
$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32
$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36
$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32
$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32
$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36
$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144110%2fevaluate-lim-x-to-infty-32x1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:21
$begingroup$
There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:22
1
$begingroup$
$x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 11 at 19:28
1
$begingroup$
"There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 11 at 19:40
1
$begingroup$
You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^2x$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Liu
Mar 11 at 20:03