Evaluate $lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1$?How do I evaluate $lim_h to infty e^h(1-s)$?A Gamma limit $lim_nrightarrow+inftysum_k=1^n left( Gammabigl(fracknbigr)right)^-k=frace^gammae^gamma-1$Evaluate the following limit of finite sumdividing expressions with limitsEuler Limit with -1 to infinity?Formal way to evaluate this limitEvaluate $lim_x to -infty ln(-x^3+x)$Limit of composite functionWhy does the following not show $zeta(0) = -frac12$?limit of Integral of product of convergent functions

How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?

What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?

Define, (actually define) the "stability" and "energy" of a compound

Opacity of an object in 2.8

Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats

Look at your watch and tell me what time is it. vs Look at your watch and tell me what time it is

Are there verbs that are neither telic, or atelic?

Is it possible to upcast ritual spells?

What is the rarity of this homebrew magic staff?

How to change two letters closest to a string and one letter immediately after a string using notepad++

Sailing the cryptic seas

How to read the value of this capacitor?

How to simplify this time periods definition interface?

How to use of "the" before known matrices

Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?

What approach do we need to follow for projects without a test environment?

What options are left, if Britain cannot decide?

Charles Hockett - 'F' article?

Unexpected result from ArcLength

How could a scammer know the apps on my phone / iTunes account?

How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?

How Could an Airship Be Repaired Mid-Flight

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

How to create the Curved texte?



Evaluate $lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1$?


How do I evaluate $lim_h to infty e^h(1-s)$?A Gamma limit $lim_nrightarrow+inftysum_k=1^n left( Gammabigl(fracknbigr)right)^-k=frace^gammae^gamma-1$Evaluate the following limit of finite sumdividing expressions with limitsEuler Limit with -1 to infinity?Formal way to evaluate this limitEvaluate $lim_x to -infty ln(-x^3+x)$Limit of composite functionWhy does the following not show $zeta(0) = -frac12$?limit of Integral of product of convergent functions













0












$begingroup$



Evaluate $lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1?$




I have two solutions for this problem and both of them look valid to me, even though one of them is incorrect.



Firstly, I know that $(2x+1)$ is an odd number, so the limit will be positive infinity when $x$ takes an even number, and limit will be negative infinity when $x$ takes an odd number. Therefore, the limit does not exist.



On the other hand, if I perform some mathematical operations on the function:



$$lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1=lim_xto inftybigl((-3)^2bigr)^xcdot(-3)=lim_xto infty9^xcdot(-3)=-9^infty=-infty$$



Where am I making a mistake on my second attempt?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 11 at 19:21










  • $begingroup$
    There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – Eldar Rahimli
    Mar 11 at 19:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
    $endgroup$
    – Cardioid_Ass_22
    Mar 11 at 19:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Mar 11 at 19:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^2x$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
    $endgroup$
    – Matthew Liu
    Mar 11 at 20:03















0












$begingroup$



Evaluate $lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1?$




I have two solutions for this problem and both of them look valid to me, even though one of them is incorrect.



Firstly, I know that $(2x+1)$ is an odd number, so the limit will be positive infinity when $x$ takes an even number, and limit will be negative infinity when $x$ takes an odd number. Therefore, the limit does not exist.



On the other hand, if I perform some mathematical operations on the function:



$$lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1=lim_xto inftybigl((-3)^2bigr)^xcdot(-3)=lim_xto infty9^xcdot(-3)=-9^infty=-infty$$



Where am I making a mistake on my second attempt?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 11 at 19:21










  • $begingroup$
    There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – Eldar Rahimli
    Mar 11 at 19:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
    $endgroup$
    – Cardioid_Ass_22
    Mar 11 at 19:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Mar 11 at 19:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^2x$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
    $endgroup$
    – Matthew Liu
    Mar 11 at 20:03













0












0








0





$begingroup$



Evaluate $lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1?$




I have two solutions for this problem and both of them look valid to me, even though one of them is incorrect.



Firstly, I know that $(2x+1)$ is an odd number, so the limit will be positive infinity when $x$ takes an even number, and limit will be negative infinity when $x$ takes an odd number. Therefore, the limit does not exist.



On the other hand, if I perform some mathematical operations on the function:



$$lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1=lim_xto inftybigl((-3)^2bigr)^xcdot(-3)=lim_xto infty9^xcdot(-3)=-9^infty=-infty$$



Where am I making a mistake on my second attempt?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Evaluate $lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1?$




I have two solutions for this problem and both of them look valid to me, even though one of them is incorrect.



Firstly, I know that $(2x+1)$ is an odd number, so the limit will be positive infinity when $x$ takes an even number, and limit will be negative infinity when $x$ takes an odd number. Therefore, the limit does not exist.



On the other hand, if I perform some mathematical operations on the function:



$$lim_xto infty(-3)^2x+1=lim_xto inftybigl((-3)^2bigr)^xcdot(-3)=lim_xto infty9^xcdot(-3)=-9^infty=-infty$$



Where am I making a mistake on my second attempt?







calculus limits






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 11 at 20:07







Eldar Rahimli

















asked Mar 11 at 19:19









Eldar RahimliEldar Rahimli

35110




35110







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 11 at 19:21










  • $begingroup$
    There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – Eldar Rahimli
    Mar 11 at 19:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
    $endgroup$
    – Cardioid_Ass_22
    Mar 11 at 19:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Mar 11 at 19:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^2x$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
    $endgroup$
    – Matthew Liu
    Mar 11 at 20:03












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 11 at 19:21










  • $begingroup$
    There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
    $endgroup$
    – Eldar Rahimli
    Mar 11 at 19:22






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
    $endgroup$
    – Cardioid_Ass_22
    Mar 11 at 19:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Mar 11 at 19:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^2x$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
    $endgroup$
    – Matthew Liu
    Mar 11 at 20:03







2




2




$begingroup$
Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:21




$begingroup$
Does $x$ go over the integers or the real numbers here?
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:21












$begingroup$
There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:22




$begingroup$
There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers.
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:22




1




1




$begingroup$
$x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 11 at 19:28




$begingroup$
$x$ being even or odd doesn't matter- as long as $x$ is an integer, $2x+1$ will always be an odd integer (regardless of the parity of $x$ itself)
$endgroup$
– Cardioid_Ass_22
Mar 11 at 19:28




1




1




$begingroup$
"There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 11 at 19:40




$begingroup$
"There isn't any additional information provided. So, I'm assuming it is real numbers. " Limit doesn't exist for real numbers. If $2x+1$ is an even integer the value is positive and if $2x+1$ is odd integer it is negative. If $2x + 1 = frac nm$ where $m$ is even it is not defined. It is not defined if $2x + 1$ is irrational.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 11 at 19:40




1




1




$begingroup$
You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^2x$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Liu
Mar 11 at 20:03




$begingroup$
You cannot perform nonsense mathematical manipulations if you have no idea what you are doing. $-3^2x$ is most definitely NOT $9^x$ for many real values of x.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Liu
Mar 11 at 20:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.



So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^2x+1$ is strictly negative.



If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
    $endgroup$
    – Eldar Rahimli
    Mar 11 at 19:32










  • $begingroup$
    @EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 11 at 19:36










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144110%2fevaluate-lim-x-to-infty-32x1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.



So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^2x+1$ is strictly negative.



If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
    $endgroup$
    – Eldar Rahimli
    Mar 11 at 19:32










  • $begingroup$
    @EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 11 at 19:36















3












$begingroup$

A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.



So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^2x+1$ is strictly negative.



If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
    $endgroup$
    – Eldar Rahimli
    Mar 11 at 19:32










  • $begingroup$
    @EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 11 at 19:36













3












3








3





$begingroup$

A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.



So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^2x+1$ is strictly negative.



If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



A negative number raised to an odd number is always negative, so "change between negative and positive" is wrong.



So assuming $x$ goes over the integers, the limit is $-infty$ as the exponent $2x+1$ is always odd. Yes, $(-3)^x$ alternates between positive and negative, but $(-3)^2x+1$ is strictly negative.



If $x$ goes over the reals, then before you can evaluate the limit you have to decide what something like $(-3)^pi$ means.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 11 at 19:35

























answered Mar 11 at 19:24









ArthurArthur

118k7117200




118k7117200











  • $begingroup$
    I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
    $endgroup$
    – Eldar Rahimli
    Mar 11 at 19:32










  • $begingroup$
    @EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 11 at 19:36
















  • $begingroup$
    I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
    $endgroup$
    – Eldar Rahimli
    Mar 11 at 19:32










  • $begingroup$
    @EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    Mar 11 at 19:36















$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32




$begingroup$
I've edited the question and clarified what I meant by "change between negative and positive". So, can we say that the problem should have stated $xin Z$ to be solvable?
$endgroup$
– Eldar Rahimli
Mar 11 at 19:32












$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36




$begingroup$
@EldarRahimli Yes, I think it really should have done that.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Mar 11 at 19:36

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144110%2fevaluate-lim-x-to-infty-32x1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?

Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576