Cauchy's Integral formula from Conway's bookCauchy integral formula for convex setscauchy theorem over cycles homologous to zeroCauchy's theorem for integral homotopic closed curve in $GsubsetmathbbC^n$.Winding numbers are continuous: The proof was too easyComplex analysis cycleWhat would be a counterexample to Cauchy's integral formula or Cauchy's theorem?Calculating $int_gammaf$ in $G = < 1$Proof of residue thereomProve that $F_m$ is continuous.Line integral with Mobius transformation
Could the Saturn V actually have launched astronauts around Venus?
How to terminate ping <dest> &
Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work
Why is the President allowed to veto a cancellation of emergency powers?
A sequence that has integer values for prime indexes only:
Did Ender ever learn that he killed Stilson and/or Bonzo?
Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?
How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?
how to write formula in word in latex
Who is flying the vertibirds?
Gravity magic - How does it work?
What did Alexander Pope mean by "Expletives their feeble Aid do join"?
How Could an Airship Be Repaired Mid-Flight
Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?
Bach's Toccata and Fugue in D minor breaks the "no parallel octaves" rule?
Look at your watch and tell me what time is it. vs Look at your watch and tell me what time it is
What approach do we need to follow for projects without a test environment?
In a future war, an old lady is trying to raise a boy but one of the weapons has made everyone deaf
The difference between「N分で」and「後N分で」
What exactly is this small puffer fish doing and how did it manage to accomplish such a feat?
Have researchers managed to "reverse time"? If so, what does that mean for physics?
How to make healing in an exploration game interesting
Min function accepting varying number of arguments in C++17
Error in Twin Prime Conjecture
Cauchy's Integral formula from Conway's book
Cauchy integral formula for convex setscauchy theorem over cycles homologous to zeroCauchy's theorem for integral homotopic closed curve in $GsubsetmathbbC^n$.Winding numbers are continuous: The proof was too easyComplex analysis cycleWhat would be a counterexample to Cauchy's integral formula or Cauchy's theorem?Calculating $int_gammaf$ in $G = z : 0 < $Proof of residue thereomProve that $F_m$ is continuous.Line integral with Mobius transformation
$begingroup$
Lemma 5.1. Let $gamma$ be a rectifiable curve and suppose $varphi$ is a function defined and continuous on $gamma$. For
each $mgeq 1$ let $F_m(z)=int
limits_gammavarphi(w)(w-z)^-mdw$ for $znotin gamma$.
Then each $F_m$ is analytic on $mathbbC-gamma$ and
$F_m'(z)=mF_m+1(z)$.
Theorem 5.6. Cauchy's Integral Formula. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If
$gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such
that $n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win
mathbbC-G$, then for $ain G-gamma$ $$f(a)sum
limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi
iint limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)z-adz.$$
Theorem 5.8. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If $gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are
closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such that
$n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win mathbbC-G$,
then for $ain G-gamma$ and $kgeq 1$ $$f^(k)(a)sum
limits_j=1^mn(gamma_j;a)=k!sum limits_j=1^mdfrac12pi
iint limits_gamma_jdfracf(z)(z-a)^k+1dz.$$
Proof: This follows immediately by differentiating both sides of the formula in Theorem 5.6 and applying Lemma 5.1
I have tried to prove Theorem 5.8 in the following way: let's do it for $k=1$. Then:
$$LHS=f'(a)sum
limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)+f(a)sum
limits_k=1^m[n(gamma_k;a)]'$$
$$RHS=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi i int limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)(z-a)^2dz$$
Note that in the RHS I've used Lemma 5.1.
Let's use Lemma 5.1 to the second sum in LHS and we get that $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Note that $n(gamma_k;a)$ means the winding number of $gamma_k$ around $a$.
How to show that the last integral is zero, i.e. $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=0$?
Would be very grateful for any help!
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lemma 5.1. Let $gamma$ be a rectifiable curve and suppose $varphi$ is a function defined and continuous on $gamma$. For
each $mgeq 1$ let $F_m(z)=int
limits_gammavarphi(w)(w-z)^-mdw$ for $znotin gamma$.
Then each $F_m$ is analytic on $mathbbC-gamma$ and
$F_m'(z)=mF_m+1(z)$.
Theorem 5.6. Cauchy's Integral Formula. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If
$gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such
that $n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win
mathbbC-G$, then for $ain G-gamma$ $$f(a)sum
limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi
iint limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)z-adz.$$
Theorem 5.8. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If $gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are
closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such that
$n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win mathbbC-G$,
then for $ain G-gamma$ and $kgeq 1$ $$f^(k)(a)sum
limits_j=1^mn(gamma_j;a)=k!sum limits_j=1^mdfrac12pi
iint limits_gamma_jdfracf(z)(z-a)^k+1dz.$$
Proof: This follows immediately by differentiating both sides of the formula in Theorem 5.6 and applying Lemma 5.1
I have tried to prove Theorem 5.8 in the following way: let's do it for $k=1$. Then:
$$LHS=f'(a)sum
limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)+f(a)sum
limits_k=1^m[n(gamma_k;a)]'$$
$$RHS=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi i int limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)(z-a)^2dz$$
Note that in the RHS I've used Lemma 5.1.
Let's use Lemma 5.1 to the second sum in LHS and we get that $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Note that $n(gamma_k;a)$ means the winding number of $gamma_k$ around $a$.
How to show that the last integral is zero, i.e. $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=0$?
Would be very grateful for any help!
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lemma 5.1. Let $gamma$ be a rectifiable curve and suppose $varphi$ is a function defined and continuous on $gamma$. For
each $mgeq 1$ let $F_m(z)=int
limits_gammavarphi(w)(w-z)^-mdw$ for $znotin gamma$.
Then each $F_m$ is analytic on $mathbbC-gamma$ and
$F_m'(z)=mF_m+1(z)$.
Theorem 5.6. Cauchy's Integral Formula. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If
$gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such
that $n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win
mathbbC-G$, then for $ain G-gamma$ $$f(a)sum
limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi
iint limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)z-adz.$$
Theorem 5.8. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If $gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are
closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such that
$n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win mathbbC-G$,
then for $ain G-gamma$ and $kgeq 1$ $$f^(k)(a)sum
limits_j=1^mn(gamma_j;a)=k!sum limits_j=1^mdfrac12pi
iint limits_gamma_jdfracf(z)(z-a)^k+1dz.$$
Proof: This follows immediately by differentiating both sides of the formula in Theorem 5.6 and applying Lemma 5.1
I have tried to prove Theorem 5.8 in the following way: let's do it for $k=1$. Then:
$$LHS=f'(a)sum
limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)+f(a)sum
limits_k=1^m[n(gamma_k;a)]'$$
$$RHS=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi i int limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)(z-a)^2dz$$
Note that in the RHS I've used Lemma 5.1.
Let's use Lemma 5.1 to the second sum in LHS and we get that $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Note that $n(gamma_k;a)$ means the winding number of $gamma_k$ around $a$.
How to show that the last integral is zero, i.e. $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=0$?
Would be very grateful for any help!
complex-analysis
$endgroup$
Lemma 5.1. Let $gamma$ be a rectifiable curve and suppose $varphi$ is a function defined and continuous on $gamma$. For
each $mgeq 1$ let $F_m(z)=int
limits_gammavarphi(w)(w-z)^-mdw$ for $znotin gamma$.
Then each $F_m$ is analytic on $mathbbC-gamma$ and
$F_m'(z)=mF_m+1(z)$.
Theorem 5.6. Cauchy's Integral Formula. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If
$gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such
that $n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win
mathbbC-G$, then for $ain G-gamma$ $$f(a)sum
limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi
iint limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)z-adz.$$
Theorem 5.8. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If $gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are
closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such that
$n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win mathbbC-G$,
then for $ain G-gamma$ and $kgeq 1$ $$f^(k)(a)sum
limits_j=1^mn(gamma_j;a)=k!sum limits_j=1^mdfrac12pi
iint limits_gamma_jdfracf(z)(z-a)^k+1dz.$$
Proof: This follows immediately by differentiating both sides of the formula in Theorem 5.6 and applying Lemma 5.1
I have tried to prove Theorem 5.8 in the following way: let's do it for $k=1$. Then:
$$LHS=f'(a)sum
limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)+f(a)sum
limits_k=1^m[n(gamma_k;a)]'$$
$$RHS=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi i int limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)(z-a)^2dz$$
Note that in the RHS I've used Lemma 5.1.
Let's use Lemma 5.1 to the second sum in LHS and we get that $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Note that $n(gamma_k;a)$ means the winding number of $gamma_k$ around $a$.
How to show that the last integral is zero, i.e. $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=0$?
Would be very grateful for any help!
complex-analysis
complex-analysis
asked Mar 11 at 20:54
ZFRZFR
5,26831440
5,26831440
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is locally constant (since it is a continuous integer valued function) and hence $fracd dan(gamma_k,a)=0forall a$. Alternatively or more analytically u can say $n'(gamma_k,a)=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Now on $mathbb C-a$ the function $frac1(z-a)^2$ has a primitive namely $-frac1z-a$ and hence since $gamma_k$ is a closed curve in $mathbb C-a$ the fundamental theorem of calculus says $intlimits_ gamma_kfrac1(z-a)^2dz=0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I know that $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is a continuous function and takes integer values. But how it follows that its derivative with respect to $a$ is zero? Could you give more details to this part, please?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Mar 11 at 21:47
$begingroup$
yes so since it is a continuous function, on an open connected set containing $a$ say a small ball, it is constant (since a cont function from a connected set to $mathbb Z$ is constant). If a function is constant on a nbhd of $a$ then the derivative at $a$ is $0$
$endgroup$
– Soumik Ghosh
Mar 11 at 21:51
$begingroup$
image of connected set under continuous mapping is connected but since we are on the integers hence its constant, right?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Mar 11 at 21:57
$begingroup$
yep.. thats it.
$endgroup$
– Soumik Ghosh
Mar 11 at 21:58
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144233%2fcauchys-integral-formula-from-conways-book%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is locally constant (since it is a continuous integer valued function) and hence $fracd dan(gamma_k,a)=0forall a$. Alternatively or more analytically u can say $n'(gamma_k,a)=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Now on $mathbb C-a$ the function $frac1(z-a)^2$ has a primitive namely $-frac1z-a$ and hence since $gamma_k$ is a closed curve in $mathbb C-a$ the fundamental theorem of calculus says $intlimits_ gamma_kfrac1(z-a)^2dz=0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I know that $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is a continuous function and takes integer values. But how it follows that its derivative with respect to $a$ is zero? Could you give more details to this part, please?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Mar 11 at 21:47
$begingroup$
yes so since it is a continuous function, on an open connected set containing $a$ say a small ball, it is constant (since a cont function from a connected set to $mathbb Z$ is constant). If a function is constant on a nbhd of $a$ then the derivative at $a$ is $0$
$endgroup$
– Soumik Ghosh
Mar 11 at 21:51
$begingroup$
image of connected set under continuous mapping is connected but since we are on the integers hence its constant, right?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Mar 11 at 21:57
$begingroup$
yep.. thats it.
$endgroup$
– Soumik Ghosh
Mar 11 at 21:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is locally constant (since it is a continuous integer valued function) and hence $fracd dan(gamma_k,a)=0forall a$. Alternatively or more analytically u can say $n'(gamma_k,a)=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Now on $mathbb C-a$ the function $frac1(z-a)^2$ has a primitive namely $-frac1z-a$ and hence since $gamma_k$ is a closed curve in $mathbb C-a$ the fundamental theorem of calculus says $intlimits_ gamma_kfrac1(z-a)^2dz=0$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I know that $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is a continuous function and takes integer values. But how it follows that its derivative with respect to $a$ is zero? Could you give more details to this part, please?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Mar 11 at 21:47
$begingroup$
yes so since it is a continuous function, on an open connected set containing $a$ say a small ball, it is constant (since a cont function from a connected set to $mathbb Z$ is constant). If a function is constant on a nbhd of $a$ then the derivative at $a$ is $0$
$endgroup$
– Soumik Ghosh
Mar 11 at 21:51
$begingroup$
image of connected set under continuous mapping is connected but since we are on the integers hence its constant, right?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Mar 11 at 21:57
$begingroup$
yep.. thats it.
$endgroup$
– Soumik Ghosh
Mar 11 at 21:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is locally constant (since it is a continuous integer valued function) and hence $fracd dan(gamma_k,a)=0forall a$. Alternatively or more analytically u can say $n'(gamma_k,a)=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Now on $mathbb C-a$ the function $frac1(z-a)^2$ has a primitive namely $-frac1z-a$ and hence since $gamma_k$ is a closed curve in $mathbb C-a$ the fundamental theorem of calculus says $intlimits_ gamma_kfrac1(z-a)^2dz=0$.
$endgroup$
$n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is locally constant (since it is a continuous integer valued function) and hence $fracd dan(gamma_k,a)=0forall a$. Alternatively or more analytically u can say $n'(gamma_k,a)=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Now on $mathbb C-a$ the function $frac1(z-a)^2$ has a primitive namely $-frac1z-a$ and hence since $gamma_k$ is a closed curve in $mathbb C-a$ the fundamental theorem of calculus says $intlimits_ gamma_kfrac1(z-a)^2dz=0$.
edited Mar 11 at 21:42
answered Mar 11 at 21:35
Soumik GhoshSoumik Ghosh
715111
715111
$begingroup$
I know that $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is a continuous function and takes integer values. But how it follows that its derivative with respect to $a$ is zero? Could you give more details to this part, please?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Mar 11 at 21:47
$begingroup$
yes so since it is a continuous function, on an open connected set containing $a$ say a small ball, it is constant (since a cont function from a connected set to $mathbb Z$ is constant). If a function is constant on a nbhd of $a$ then the derivative at $a$ is $0$
$endgroup$
– Soumik Ghosh
Mar 11 at 21:51
$begingroup$
image of connected set under continuous mapping is connected but since we are on the integers hence its constant, right?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Mar 11 at 21:57
$begingroup$
yep.. thats it.
$endgroup$
– Soumik Ghosh
Mar 11 at 21:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know that $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is a continuous function and takes integer values. But how it follows that its derivative with respect to $a$ is zero? Could you give more details to this part, please?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Mar 11 at 21:47
$begingroup$
yes so since it is a continuous function, on an open connected set containing $a$ say a small ball, it is constant (since a cont function from a connected set to $mathbb Z$ is constant). If a function is constant on a nbhd of $a$ then the derivative at $a$ is $0$
$endgroup$
– Soumik Ghosh
Mar 11 at 21:51
$begingroup$
image of connected set under continuous mapping is connected but since we are on the integers hence its constant, right?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Mar 11 at 21:57
$begingroup$
yep.. thats it.
$endgroup$
– Soumik Ghosh
Mar 11 at 21:58
$begingroup$
I know that $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is a continuous function and takes integer values. But how it follows that its derivative with respect to $a$ is zero? Could you give more details to this part, please?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Mar 11 at 21:47
$begingroup$
I know that $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is a continuous function and takes integer values. But how it follows that its derivative with respect to $a$ is zero? Could you give more details to this part, please?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Mar 11 at 21:47
$begingroup$
yes so since it is a continuous function, on an open connected set containing $a$ say a small ball, it is constant (since a cont function from a connected set to $mathbb Z$ is constant). If a function is constant on a nbhd of $a$ then the derivative at $a$ is $0$
$endgroup$
– Soumik Ghosh
Mar 11 at 21:51
$begingroup$
yes so since it is a continuous function, on an open connected set containing $a$ say a small ball, it is constant (since a cont function from a connected set to $mathbb Z$ is constant). If a function is constant on a nbhd of $a$ then the derivative at $a$ is $0$
$endgroup$
– Soumik Ghosh
Mar 11 at 21:51
$begingroup$
image of connected set under continuous mapping is connected but since we are on the integers hence its constant, right?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Mar 11 at 21:57
$begingroup$
image of connected set under continuous mapping is connected but since we are on the integers hence its constant, right?
$endgroup$
– ZFR
Mar 11 at 21:57
$begingroup$
yep.. thats it.
$endgroup$
– Soumik Ghosh
Mar 11 at 21:58
$begingroup$
yep.. thats it.
$endgroup$
– Soumik Ghosh
Mar 11 at 21:58
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144233%2fcauchys-integral-formula-from-conways-book%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown