Cauchy's Integral formula from Conway's bookCauchy integral formula for convex setscauchy theorem over cycles homologous to zeroCauchy's theorem for integral homotopic closed curve in $GsubsetmathbbC^n$.Winding numbers are continuous: The proof was too easyComplex analysis cycleWhat would be a counterexample to Cauchy's integral formula or Cauchy's theorem?Calculating $int_gammaf$ in $G = < 1$Proof of residue thereomProve that $F_m$ is continuous.Line integral with Mobius transformation

Could the Saturn V actually have launched astronauts around Venus?

How to terminate ping <dest> &

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

Why is the President allowed to veto a cancellation of emergency powers?

A sequence that has integer values for prime indexes only:

Did Ender ever learn that he killed Stilson and/or Bonzo?

Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?

How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?

how to write formula in word in latex

Who is flying the vertibirds?

Gravity magic - How does it work?

What did Alexander Pope mean by "Expletives their feeble Aid do join"?

How Could an Airship Be Repaired Mid-Flight

Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?

Bach's Toccata and Fugue in D minor breaks the "no parallel octaves" rule?

Look at your watch and tell me what time is it. vs Look at your watch and tell me what time it is

What approach do we need to follow for projects without a test environment?

In a future war, an old lady is trying to raise a boy but one of the weapons has made everyone deaf

The difference between「N分で」and「後N分で」

What exactly is this small puffer fish doing and how did it manage to accomplish such a feat?

Have researchers managed to "reverse time"? If so, what does that mean for physics?

How to make healing in an exploration game interesting

Min function accepting varying number of arguments in C++17

Error in Twin Prime Conjecture



Cauchy's Integral formula from Conway's book


Cauchy integral formula for convex setscauchy theorem over cycles homologous to zeroCauchy's theorem for integral homotopic closed curve in $GsubsetmathbbC^n$.Winding numbers are continuous: The proof was too easyComplex analysis cycleWhat would be a counterexample to Cauchy's integral formula or Cauchy's theorem?Calculating $int_gammaf$ in $G = z : 0 < $Proof of residue thereomProve that $F_m$ is continuous.Line integral with Mobius transformation













1












$begingroup$



Lemma 5.1. Let $gamma$ be a rectifiable curve and suppose $varphi$ is a function defined and continuous on $gamma$. For
each $mgeq 1$ let $F_m(z)=int
limits_gammavarphi(w)(w-z)^-mdw$
for $znotin gamma$.
Then each $F_m$ is analytic on $mathbbC-gamma$ and
$F_m'(z)=mF_m+1(z)$.



Theorem 5.6. Cauchy's Integral Formula. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If
$gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such
that $n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win
mathbbC-G$
, then for $ain G-gamma$ $$f(a)sum
limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi
iint limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)z-adz.$$



Theorem 5.8. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If $gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are
closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such that
$n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win mathbbC-G$,
then for $ain G-gamma$ and $kgeq 1$ $$f^(k)(a)sum
limits_j=1^mn(gamma_j;a)=k!sum limits_j=1^mdfrac12pi
iint limits_gamma_jdfracf(z)(z-a)^k+1dz.$$



Proof: This follows immediately by differentiating both sides of the formula in Theorem 5.6 and applying Lemma 5.1




I have tried to prove Theorem 5.8 in the following way: let's do it for $k=1$. Then:



$$LHS=f'(a)sum
limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)+f(a)sum
limits_k=1^m[n(gamma_k;a)]'$$



$$RHS=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi i int limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)(z-a)^2dz$$



Note that in the RHS I've used Lemma 5.1.
Let's use Lemma 5.1 to the second sum in LHS and we get that $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Note that $n(gamma_k;a)$ means the winding number of $gamma_k$ around $a$.



How to show that the last integral is zero, i.e. $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=0$?



Would be very grateful for any help!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$



    Lemma 5.1. Let $gamma$ be a rectifiable curve and suppose $varphi$ is a function defined and continuous on $gamma$. For
    each $mgeq 1$ let $F_m(z)=int
    limits_gammavarphi(w)(w-z)^-mdw$
    for $znotin gamma$.
    Then each $F_m$ is analytic on $mathbbC-gamma$ and
    $F_m'(z)=mF_m+1(z)$.



    Theorem 5.6. Cauchy's Integral Formula. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If
    $gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such
    that $n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win
    mathbbC-G$
    , then for $ain G-gamma$ $$f(a)sum
    limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi
    iint limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)z-adz.$$



    Theorem 5.8. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If $gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are
    closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such that
    $n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win mathbbC-G$,
    then for $ain G-gamma$ and $kgeq 1$ $$f^(k)(a)sum
    limits_j=1^mn(gamma_j;a)=k!sum limits_j=1^mdfrac12pi
    iint limits_gamma_jdfracf(z)(z-a)^k+1dz.$$



    Proof: This follows immediately by differentiating both sides of the formula in Theorem 5.6 and applying Lemma 5.1




    I have tried to prove Theorem 5.8 in the following way: let's do it for $k=1$. Then:



    $$LHS=f'(a)sum
    limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)+f(a)sum
    limits_k=1^m[n(gamma_k;a)]'$$



    $$RHS=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi i int limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)(z-a)^2dz$$



    Note that in the RHS I've used Lemma 5.1.
    Let's use Lemma 5.1 to the second sum in LHS and we get that $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Note that $n(gamma_k;a)$ means the winding number of $gamma_k$ around $a$.



    How to show that the last integral is zero, i.e. $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=0$?



    Would be very grateful for any help!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1


      0



      $begingroup$



      Lemma 5.1. Let $gamma$ be a rectifiable curve and suppose $varphi$ is a function defined and continuous on $gamma$. For
      each $mgeq 1$ let $F_m(z)=int
      limits_gammavarphi(w)(w-z)^-mdw$
      for $znotin gamma$.
      Then each $F_m$ is analytic on $mathbbC-gamma$ and
      $F_m'(z)=mF_m+1(z)$.



      Theorem 5.6. Cauchy's Integral Formula. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If
      $gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such
      that $n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win
      mathbbC-G$
      , then for $ain G-gamma$ $$f(a)sum
      limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi
      iint limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)z-adz.$$



      Theorem 5.8. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If $gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are
      closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such that
      $n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win mathbbC-G$,
      then for $ain G-gamma$ and $kgeq 1$ $$f^(k)(a)sum
      limits_j=1^mn(gamma_j;a)=k!sum limits_j=1^mdfrac12pi
      iint limits_gamma_jdfracf(z)(z-a)^k+1dz.$$



      Proof: This follows immediately by differentiating both sides of the formula in Theorem 5.6 and applying Lemma 5.1




      I have tried to prove Theorem 5.8 in the following way: let's do it for $k=1$. Then:



      $$LHS=f'(a)sum
      limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)+f(a)sum
      limits_k=1^m[n(gamma_k;a)]'$$



      $$RHS=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi i int limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)(z-a)^2dz$$



      Note that in the RHS I've used Lemma 5.1.
      Let's use Lemma 5.1 to the second sum in LHS and we get that $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Note that $n(gamma_k;a)$ means the winding number of $gamma_k$ around $a$.



      How to show that the last integral is zero, i.e. $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=0$?



      Would be very grateful for any help!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      Lemma 5.1. Let $gamma$ be a rectifiable curve and suppose $varphi$ is a function defined and continuous on $gamma$. For
      each $mgeq 1$ let $F_m(z)=int
      limits_gammavarphi(w)(w-z)^-mdw$
      for $znotin gamma$.
      Then each $F_m$ is analytic on $mathbbC-gamma$ and
      $F_m'(z)=mF_m+1(z)$.



      Theorem 5.6. Cauchy's Integral Formula. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If
      $gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such
      that $n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win
      mathbbC-G$
      , then for $ain G-gamma$ $$f(a)sum
      limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi
      iint limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)z-adz.$$



      Theorem 5.8. Let $G$ be an open subset of the plane and $f:Gto mathbbC$ an analytic function. If $gamma_1,dots,gamma_m$ are
      closed rectifiable curves in $G$ such that
      $n(gamma_1;w)+dots+n(gamma_m;w)=0$ for all $win mathbbC-G$,
      then for $ain G-gamma$ and $kgeq 1$ $$f^(k)(a)sum
      limits_j=1^mn(gamma_j;a)=k!sum limits_j=1^mdfrac12pi
      iint limits_gamma_jdfracf(z)(z-a)^k+1dz.$$



      Proof: This follows immediately by differentiating both sides of the formula in Theorem 5.6 and applying Lemma 5.1




      I have tried to prove Theorem 5.8 in the following way: let's do it for $k=1$. Then:



      $$LHS=f'(a)sum
      limits_k=1^mn(gamma_k;a)+f(a)sum
      limits_k=1^m[n(gamma_k;a)]'$$



      $$RHS=sum limits_k=1^mdfrac12pi i int limits_gamma_kdfracf(z)(z-a)^2dz$$



      Note that in the RHS I've used Lemma 5.1.
      Let's use Lemma 5.1 to the second sum in LHS and we get that $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Note that $n(gamma_k;a)$ means the winding number of $gamma_k$ around $a$.



      How to show that the last integral is zero, i.e. $[n(gamma_k;a)]'=0$?



      Would be very grateful for any help!







      complex-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 11 at 20:54









      ZFRZFR

      5,26831440




      5,26831440




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is locally constant (since it is a continuous integer valued function) and hence $fracd dan(gamma_k,a)=0forall a$. Alternatively or more analytically u can say $n'(gamma_k,a)=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Now on $mathbb C-a$ the function $frac1(z-a)^2$ has a primitive namely $-frac1z-a$ and hence since $gamma_k$ is a closed curve in $mathbb C-a$ the fundamental theorem of calculus says $intlimits_ gamma_kfrac1(z-a)^2dz=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I know that $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is a continuous function and takes integer values. But how it follows that its derivative with respect to $a$ is zero? Could you give more details to this part, please?
            $endgroup$
            – ZFR
            Mar 11 at 21:47










          • $begingroup$
            yes so since it is a continuous function, on an open connected set containing $a$ say a small ball, it is constant (since a cont function from a connected set to $mathbb Z$ is constant). If a function is constant on a nbhd of $a$ then the derivative at $a$ is $0$
            $endgroup$
            – Soumik Ghosh
            Mar 11 at 21:51











          • $begingroup$
            image of connected set under continuous mapping is connected but since we are on the integers hence its constant, right?
            $endgroup$
            – ZFR
            Mar 11 at 21:57










          • $begingroup$
            yep.. thats it.
            $endgroup$
            – Soumik Ghosh
            Mar 11 at 21:58










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144233%2fcauchys-integral-formula-from-conways-book%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is locally constant (since it is a continuous integer valued function) and hence $fracd dan(gamma_k,a)=0forall a$. Alternatively or more analytically u can say $n'(gamma_k,a)=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Now on $mathbb C-a$ the function $frac1(z-a)^2$ has a primitive namely $-frac1z-a$ and hence since $gamma_k$ is a closed curve in $mathbb C-a$ the fundamental theorem of calculus says $intlimits_ gamma_kfrac1(z-a)^2dz=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I know that $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is a continuous function and takes integer values. But how it follows that its derivative with respect to $a$ is zero? Could you give more details to this part, please?
            $endgroup$
            – ZFR
            Mar 11 at 21:47










          • $begingroup$
            yes so since it is a continuous function, on an open connected set containing $a$ say a small ball, it is constant (since a cont function from a connected set to $mathbb Z$ is constant). If a function is constant on a nbhd of $a$ then the derivative at $a$ is $0$
            $endgroup$
            – Soumik Ghosh
            Mar 11 at 21:51











          • $begingroup$
            image of connected set under continuous mapping is connected but since we are on the integers hence its constant, right?
            $endgroup$
            – ZFR
            Mar 11 at 21:57










          • $begingroup$
            yep.. thats it.
            $endgroup$
            – Soumik Ghosh
            Mar 11 at 21:58















          3












          $begingroup$

          $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is locally constant (since it is a continuous integer valued function) and hence $fracd dan(gamma_k,a)=0forall a$. Alternatively or more analytically u can say $n'(gamma_k,a)=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Now on $mathbb C-a$ the function $frac1(z-a)^2$ has a primitive namely $-frac1z-a$ and hence since $gamma_k$ is a closed curve in $mathbb C-a$ the fundamental theorem of calculus says $intlimits_ gamma_kfrac1(z-a)^2dz=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I know that $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is a continuous function and takes integer values. But how it follows that its derivative with respect to $a$ is zero? Could you give more details to this part, please?
            $endgroup$
            – ZFR
            Mar 11 at 21:47










          • $begingroup$
            yes so since it is a continuous function, on an open connected set containing $a$ say a small ball, it is constant (since a cont function from a connected set to $mathbb Z$ is constant). If a function is constant on a nbhd of $a$ then the derivative at $a$ is $0$
            $endgroup$
            – Soumik Ghosh
            Mar 11 at 21:51











          • $begingroup$
            image of connected set under continuous mapping is connected but since we are on the integers hence its constant, right?
            $endgroup$
            – ZFR
            Mar 11 at 21:57










          • $begingroup$
            yep.. thats it.
            $endgroup$
            – Soumik Ghosh
            Mar 11 at 21:58













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is locally constant (since it is a continuous integer valued function) and hence $fracd dan(gamma_k,a)=0forall a$. Alternatively or more analytically u can say $n'(gamma_k,a)=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Now on $mathbb C-a$ the function $frac1(z-a)^2$ has a primitive namely $-frac1z-a$ and hence since $gamma_k$ is a closed curve in $mathbb C-a$ the fundamental theorem of calculus says $intlimits_ gamma_kfrac1(z-a)^2dz=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is locally constant (since it is a continuous integer valued function) and hence $fracd dan(gamma_k,a)=0forall a$. Alternatively or more analytically u can say $n'(gamma_k,a)=int limits_gamma_kdfracdz(z-a)^2$. Now on $mathbb C-a$ the function $frac1(z-a)^2$ has a primitive namely $-frac1z-a$ and hence since $gamma_k$ is a closed curve in $mathbb C-a$ the fundamental theorem of calculus says $intlimits_ gamma_kfrac1(z-a)^2dz=0$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 11 at 21:42

























          answered Mar 11 at 21:35









          Soumik GhoshSoumik Ghosh

          715111




          715111











          • $begingroup$
            I know that $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is a continuous function and takes integer values. But how it follows that its derivative with respect to $a$ is zero? Could you give more details to this part, please?
            $endgroup$
            – ZFR
            Mar 11 at 21:47










          • $begingroup$
            yes so since it is a continuous function, on an open connected set containing $a$ say a small ball, it is constant (since a cont function from a connected set to $mathbb Z$ is constant). If a function is constant on a nbhd of $a$ then the derivative at $a$ is $0$
            $endgroup$
            – Soumik Ghosh
            Mar 11 at 21:51











          • $begingroup$
            image of connected set under continuous mapping is connected but since we are on the integers hence its constant, right?
            $endgroup$
            – ZFR
            Mar 11 at 21:57










          • $begingroup$
            yep.. thats it.
            $endgroup$
            – Soumik Ghosh
            Mar 11 at 21:58
















          • $begingroup$
            I know that $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is a continuous function and takes integer values. But how it follows that its derivative with respect to $a$ is zero? Could you give more details to this part, please?
            $endgroup$
            – ZFR
            Mar 11 at 21:47










          • $begingroup$
            yes so since it is a continuous function, on an open connected set containing $a$ say a small ball, it is constant (since a cont function from a connected set to $mathbb Z$ is constant). If a function is constant on a nbhd of $a$ then the derivative at $a$ is $0$
            $endgroup$
            – Soumik Ghosh
            Mar 11 at 21:51











          • $begingroup$
            image of connected set under continuous mapping is connected but since we are on the integers hence its constant, right?
            $endgroup$
            – ZFR
            Mar 11 at 21:57










          • $begingroup$
            yep.. thats it.
            $endgroup$
            – Soumik Ghosh
            Mar 11 at 21:58















          $begingroup$
          I know that $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is a continuous function and takes integer values. But how it follows that its derivative with respect to $a$ is zero? Could you give more details to this part, please?
          $endgroup$
          – ZFR
          Mar 11 at 21:47




          $begingroup$
          I know that $n(gamma_k,a)$ as a function of $a$ is a continuous function and takes integer values. But how it follows that its derivative with respect to $a$ is zero? Could you give more details to this part, please?
          $endgroup$
          – ZFR
          Mar 11 at 21:47












          $begingroup$
          yes so since it is a continuous function, on an open connected set containing $a$ say a small ball, it is constant (since a cont function from a connected set to $mathbb Z$ is constant). If a function is constant on a nbhd of $a$ then the derivative at $a$ is $0$
          $endgroup$
          – Soumik Ghosh
          Mar 11 at 21:51





          $begingroup$
          yes so since it is a continuous function, on an open connected set containing $a$ say a small ball, it is constant (since a cont function from a connected set to $mathbb Z$ is constant). If a function is constant on a nbhd of $a$ then the derivative at $a$ is $0$
          $endgroup$
          – Soumik Ghosh
          Mar 11 at 21:51













          $begingroup$
          image of connected set under continuous mapping is connected but since we are on the integers hence its constant, right?
          $endgroup$
          – ZFR
          Mar 11 at 21:57




          $begingroup$
          image of connected set under continuous mapping is connected but since we are on the integers hence its constant, right?
          $endgroup$
          – ZFR
          Mar 11 at 21:57












          $begingroup$
          yep.. thats it.
          $endgroup$
          – Soumik Ghosh
          Mar 11 at 21:58




          $begingroup$
          yep.. thats it.
          $endgroup$
          – Soumik Ghosh
          Mar 11 at 21:58

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144233%2fcauchys-integral-formula-from-conways-book%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye