Matching in a bipartite graphbipartite graph matchingbipartite graph matching exerciseMatching in $n$ by $b$ bipartite graphProof bipartite graph matchingComplete matching in bipartite graphMaximum matching for bipartite graphHow would we prove that the following bipartite graph has a perfect matching?Proofs involving a $d$-regular bipartite graphGraph Theory - MatchingBipartite graph $G=(A,B)$ with $delta(A)=3n/2$ and no $C_4$ has a matching which saturate each vertex in $A$.

Could the Saturn V actually have launched astronauts around Venus?

What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?

What did Alexander Pope mean by "Expletives their feeble Aid do join"?

Instead of Universal Basic Income, why not Universal Basic NEEDS?

The difference between「N分で」and「後N分で」

Have researchers managed to "reverse time"? If so, what does that mean for physics?

How do anti-virus programs start at Windows boot?

My Graph Theory Students

compactness of a set where am I going wrong

Dice rolling probability game

What options are left, if Britain cannot decide?

A sequence that has integer values for prime indexes only:

What is a^b and (a&b)<<1?

What's the meaning of “spike” in the context of “adrenaline spike”?

A Cautionary Suggestion

Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?

Gantt Chart like rectangles with log scale

Does Mathematica reuse previous computations?

If I can solve Sudoku can I solve Travelling Salesman Problem(TSP)? If yes, how?

Are there verbs that are neither telic, or atelic?

Is this a real picture of Jordan Peterson in New Zealand with a fan wearing a shirt that says "I'm a Proud Islamaphobe"?

Do I need to be arrogant to get ahead?

Can I use USB data pins as power source

Why is the President allowed to veto a cancellation of emergency powers?



Matching in a bipartite graph


bipartite graph matchingbipartite graph matching exerciseMatching in $n$ by $b$ bipartite graphProof bipartite graph matchingComplete matching in bipartite graphMaximum matching for bipartite graphHow would we prove that the following bipartite graph has a perfect matching?Proofs involving a $d$-regular bipartite graphGraph Theory - MatchingBipartite graph $G=(A,B)$ with $delta(A)=3n/2$ and no $C_4$ has a matching which saturate each vertex in $A$.













2












$begingroup$


Suppose that $G$ is a bipartite graph with bipartition $(A,B)$ and $G$ is $C_4$-free. Prove that if every vertex in $A$ has degree at least $frac32 x$ and $|A|leq x^2$, then $G$ has a matching which uses every vertex in $A$.



Would I have to use Hall's Theorem in some way because there is matching or Tuttes?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Suppose that $G$ is a bipartite graph with bipartition $(A,B)$ and $G$ is $C_4$-free. Prove that if every vertex in $A$ has degree at least $frac32 x$ and $|A|leq x^2$, then $G$ has a matching which uses every vertex in $A$.



    Would I have to use Hall's Theorem in some way because there is matching or Tuttes?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2


      0



      $begingroup$


      Suppose that $G$ is a bipartite graph with bipartition $(A,B)$ and $G$ is $C_4$-free. Prove that if every vertex in $A$ has degree at least $frac32 x$ and $|A|leq x^2$, then $G$ has a matching which uses every vertex in $A$.



      Would I have to use Hall's Theorem in some way because there is matching or Tuttes?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Suppose that $G$ is a bipartite graph with bipartition $(A,B)$ and $G$ is $C_4$-free. Prove that if every vertex in $A$ has degree at least $frac32 x$ and $|A|leq x^2$, then $G$ has a matching which uses every vertex in $A$.



      Would I have to use Hall's Theorem in some way because there is matching or Tuttes?







      graph-theory matching-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 21 '18 at 21:17









      Maria Mazur

      47k1260120




      47k1260120










      asked May 2 '15 at 1:55









      LindseyLindsey

      978




      978




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Assume the statement is not true and let $M$ be a maximum matching, $v$ an unmatched vertex of $A$.
          Note that the requirement that $G$ is $C_4$-free means, that two vertices cannot have 2 common neighbours.
          Let $t=lceilfrac32xrceil$.



          $v$ has at least $t$ neighbours in $B$ that are all matched by $M$, call them $b_1,ldots,b_t$
          and let $a_1,ldots,a_t$ be the vertices of $A$ such that $a_ib_i$ is an edge of $M$.
          Each of the $a_i$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours in $B$ that must be different from all $b_i$
          and each of them must be matched by $M$ (why?).



          So $a_1$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours different from the $b_i$, call this set $A_1$.



          $a_2$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours different from the $b_i$, and it can only have one neighbour in common
          with $a_1$, so there is a set $A_2$ of size at least $t-2$ this is disjoint from both the $b_i$ and $A_1$.



          Continuing this way (make a nice induction argument if you like), we find
          $t+(t-1)+ldots+1$ different elements of $B$, all matched by $M$, so $A$ also must have at least
          this number of elements.



          Since $t+(t-1)+ldots+1=fract(t+1)2geqfracfrac94x^22>x^2$ we found a contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Why must each be matched by M?
            $endgroup$
            – Lindsey
            May 4 '15 at 18:54










          • $begingroup$
            If $a_i$ would have a neighbor $c$ that is not matched by $M$, then $vb_ia_ic$ is an $M$-augmenting path, contradicting the maximality of $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – Leen Droogendijk
            May 5 '15 at 6:14










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1261410%2fmatching-in-a-bipartite-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          Assume the statement is not true and let $M$ be a maximum matching, $v$ an unmatched vertex of $A$.
          Note that the requirement that $G$ is $C_4$-free means, that two vertices cannot have 2 common neighbours.
          Let $t=lceilfrac32xrceil$.



          $v$ has at least $t$ neighbours in $B$ that are all matched by $M$, call them $b_1,ldots,b_t$
          and let $a_1,ldots,a_t$ be the vertices of $A$ such that $a_ib_i$ is an edge of $M$.
          Each of the $a_i$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours in $B$ that must be different from all $b_i$
          and each of them must be matched by $M$ (why?).



          So $a_1$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours different from the $b_i$, call this set $A_1$.



          $a_2$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours different from the $b_i$, and it can only have one neighbour in common
          with $a_1$, so there is a set $A_2$ of size at least $t-2$ this is disjoint from both the $b_i$ and $A_1$.



          Continuing this way (make a nice induction argument if you like), we find
          $t+(t-1)+ldots+1$ different elements of $B$, all matched by $M$, so $A$ also must have at least
          this number of elements.



          Since $t+(t-1)+ldots+1=fract(t+1)2geqfracfrac94x^22>x^2$ we found a contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Why must each be matched by M?
            $endgroup$
            – Lindsey
            May 4 '15 at 18:54










          • $begingroup$
            If $a_i$ would have a neighbor $c$ that is not matched by $M$, then $vb_ia_ic$ is an $M$-augmenting path, contradicting the maximality of $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – Leen Droogendijk
            May 5 '15 at 6:14















          0












          $begingroup$

          Assume the statement is not true and let $M$ be a maximum matching, $v$ an unmatched vertex of $A$.
          Note that the requirement that $G$ is $C_4$-free means, that two vertices cannot have 2 common neighbours.
          Let $t=lceilfrac32xrceil$.



          $v$ has at least $t$ neighbours in $B$ that are all matched by $M$, call them $b_1,ldots,b_t$
          and let $a_1,ldots,a_t$ be the vertices of $A$ such that $a_ib_i$ is an edge of $M$.
          Each of the $a_i$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours in $B$ that must be different from all $b_i$
          and each of them must be matched by $M$ (why?).



          So $a_1$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours different from the $b_i$, call this set $A_1$.



          $a_2$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours different from the $b_i$, and it can only have one neighbour in common
          with $a_1$, so there is a set $A_2$ of size at least $t-2$ this is disjoint from both the $b_i$ and $A_1$.



          Continuing this way (make a nice induction argument if you like), we find
          $t+(t-1)+ldots+1$ different elements of $B$, all matched by $M$, so $A$ also must have at least
          this number of elements.



          Since $t+(t-1)+ldots+1=fract(t+1)2geqfracfrac94x^22>x^2$ we found a contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Why must each be matched by M?
            $endgroup$
            – Lindsey
            May 4 '15 at 18:54










          • $begingroup$
            If $a_i$ would have a neighbor $c$ that is not matched by $M$, then $vb_ia_ic$ is an $M$-augmenting path, contradicting the maximality of $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – Leen Droogendijk
            May 5 '15 at 6:14













          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Assume the statement is not true and let $M$ be a maximum matching, $v$ an unmatched vertex of $A$.
          Note that the requirement that $G$ is $C_4$-free means, that two vertices cannot have 2 common neighbours.
          Let $t=lceilfrac32xrceil$.



          $v$ has at least $t$ neighbours in $B$ that are all matched by $M$, call them $b_1,ldots,b_t$
          and let $a_1,ldots,a_t$ be the vertices of $A$ such that $a_ib_i$ is an edge of $M$.
          Each of the $a_i$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours in $B$ that must be different from all $b_i$
          and each of them must be matched by $M$ (why?).



          So $a_1$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours different from the $b_i$, call this set $A_1$.



          $a_2$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours different from the $b_i$, and it can only have one neighbour in common
          with $a_1$, so there is a set $A_2$ of size at least $t-2$ this is disjoint from both the $b_i$ and $A_1$.



          Continuing this way (make a nice induction argument if you like), we find
          $t+(t-1)+ldots+1$ different elements of $B$, all matched by $M$, so $A$ also must have at least
          this number of elements.



          Since $t+(t-1)+ldots+1=fract(t+1)2geqfracfrac94x^22>x^2$ we found a contradiction.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Assume the statement is not true and let $M$ be a maximum matching, $v$ an unmatched vertex of $A$.
          Note that the requirement that $G$ is $C_4$-free means, that two vertices cannot have 2 common neighbours.
          Let $t=lceilfrac32xrceil$.



          $v$ has at least $t$ neighbours in $B$ that are all matched by $M$, call them $b_1,ldots,b_t$
          and let $a_1,ldots,a_t$ be the vertices of $A$ such that $a_ib_i$ is an edge of $M$.
          Each of the $a_i$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours in $B$ that must be different from all $b_i$
          and each of them must be matched by $M$ (why?).



          So $a_1$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours different from the $b_i$, call this set $A_1$.



          $a_2$ has at least $t-1$ neighbours different from the $b_i$, and it can only have one neighbour in common
          with $a_1$, so there is a set $A_2$ of size at least $t-2$ this is disjoint from both the $b_i$ and $A_1$.



          Continuing this way (make a nice induction argument if you like), we find
          $t+(t-1)+ldots+1$ different elements of $B$, all matched by $M$, so $A$ also must have at least
          this number of elements.



          Since $t+(t-1)+ldots+1=fract(t+1)2geqfracfrac94x^22>x^2$ we found a contradiction.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered May 3 '15 at 9:17









          Leen DroogendijkLeen Droogendijk

          6,1551716




          6,1551716











          • $begingroup$
            Why must each be matched by M?
            $endgroup$
            – Lindsey
            May 4 '15 at 18:54










          • $begingroup$
            If $a_i$ would have a neighbor $c$ that is not matched by $M$, then $vb_ia_ic$ is an $M$-augmenting path, contradicting the maximality of $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – Leen Droogendijk
            May 5 '15 at 6:14
















          • $begingroup$
            Why must each be matched by M?
            $endgroup$
            – Lindsey
            May 4 '15 at 18:54










          • $begingroup$
            If $a_i$ would have a neighbor $c$ that is not matched by $M$, then $vb_ia_ic$ is an $M$-augmenting path, contradicting the maximality of $M$.
            $endgroup$
            – Leen Droogendijk
            May 5 '15 at 6:14















          $begingroup$
          Why must each be matched by M?
          $endgroup$
          – Lindsey
          May 4 '15 at 18:54




          $begingroup$
          Why must each be matched by M?
          $endgroup$
          – Lindsey
          May 4 '15 at 18:54












          $begingroup$
          If $a_i$ would have a neighbor $c$ that is not matched by $M$, then $vb_ia_ic$ is an $M$-augmenting path, contradicting the maximality of $M$.
          $endgroup$
          – Leen Droogendijk
          May 5 '15 at 6:14




          $begingroup$
          If $a_i$ would have a neighbor $c$ that is not matched by $M$, then $vb_ia_ic$ is an $M$-augmenting path, contradicting the maximality of $M$.
          $endgroup$
          – Leen Droogendijk
          May 5 '15 at 6:14

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1261410%2fmatching-in-a-bipartite-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

          Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

          Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers