Separating variables in a PDE with multiple constantsHow to solve this PDE?Solving one dimensonal PDESolving the Laplace equation in terms of exponential of hyperbolic trigonometric functionsPDE with periodic boundary conditionsSolving a PDE through separation of variablesPDE using separation of variablesUsing Laplace Transforms to solve a PDETextbook Example Solving Heat Conduction PDE Using Separation of VariablesProblem with satisfying Boundary conditions for 1D heat PDESolving PDE using separation of variables (Heat diffusion)

What exactly is this small puffer fish doing and how did it manage to accomplish such a feat?

Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?

What should tie a collection of short-stories together?

How can I track script which gives me "command not found" right after the login?

What has been your most complicated TikZ drawing?

What do Xenomorphs eat in the Alien series?

Are ETF trackers fundamentally better than individual stocks?

How to use deus ex machina safely?

Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats

How to deal with a cynical class?

What's the meaning of “spike” in the context of “adrenaline spike”?

How to write cleanly even if my character uses expletive language?

Brexit - No Deal Rejection

Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?

Can a druid choose the size of its wild shape beast?

Why one should not leave fingerprints on bulbs and plugs?

Do these spellcasting foci from Xanathar's Guide to Everything have to be held in a hand?

How to deal with taxi scam when on vacation?

Why does Bach not break the rules here?

Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?

How to terminate ping <dest> &

Does someone need to be connected to my network to sniff HTTP requests?

The difference between「N分で」and「後N分で」

How could a scammer know the apps on my phone / iTunes account?



Separating variables in a PDE with multiple constants


How to solve this PDE?Solving one dimensonal PDESolving the Laplace equation in terms of exponential of hyperbolic trigonometric functionsPDE with periodic boundary conditionsSolving a PDE through separation of variablesPDE using separation of variablesUsing Laplace Transforms to solve a PDETextbook Example Solving Heat Conduction PDE Using Separation of VariablesProblem with satisfying Boundary conditions for 1D heat PDESolving PDE using separation of variables (Heat diffusion)













0












$begingroup$


My question is:



How do you use separation of variables on a PDE that has more than one constant in it?



All the examples I can find in my book/online only have one constant in it, like $$ fracpartial upartial t=kfracpartial^2
upartial x^2+kfracpartial^2 upartial y^2$$



Which then means only one of the resultant ODEs has $k$ in it. If there is more than one constant, what do you do? Still use separation of variables? My attempt is below the question.



The problem I am working on is:




Solve



$displaystyle fracpartial upartial t=k_1fracpartial^2
upartial x^2+k_2fracpartial^2 upartial y^2$



on a rectangle $(0 lt x lt L, 0 lt y lt H)$ subject to



$displaystyle u(0,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,0,t)=0$



$displaystyle u(0,y,0)=alpha(x,y)$



$displaystyle u(L,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,H,t)=0$




What I have done so far:



Let $u(x,t)=X(x)Y(y)T(t)$. Then using separation of variables we have:



(1) $displaystyle fracd Td t=-lambda(k_1+k_2)T, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$



(2) $displaystyle fracd^2Xdx^2=-mu frac(k_1+k_2)Xk_1, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$



(3) $displaystyle fracd^2Ydy^2=-(lambda - mu) frac(k_1+k_2)Yk_2, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What if you now solve these ODE's? The first gives an exponential, the second and third gives sines and cosines. That gives you $T,X$ and $Y$. And then check if $XYT$ is a solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Wagemaker
    Mar 11 at 20:56















0












$begingroup$


My question is:



How do you use separation of variables on a PDE that has more than one constant in it?



All the examples I can find in my book/online only have one constant in it, like $$ fracpartial upartial t=kfracpartial^2
upartial x^2+kfracpartial^2 upartial y^2$$



Which then means only one of the resultant ODEs has $k$ in it. If there is more than one constant, what do you do? Still use separation of variables? My attempt is below the question.



The problem I am working on is:




Solve



$displaystyle fracpartial upartial t=k_1fracpartial^2
upartial x^2+k_2fracpartial^2 upartial y^2$



on a rectangle $(0 lt x lt L, 0 lt y lt H)$ subject to



$displaystyle u(0,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,0,t)=0$



$displaystyle u(0,y,0)=alpha(x,y)$



$displaystyle u(L,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,H,t)=0$




What I have done so far:



Let $u(x,t)=X(x)Y(y)T(t)$. Then using separation of variables we have:



(1) $displaystyle fracd Td t=-lambda(k_1+k_2)T, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$



(2) $displaystyle fracd^2Xdx^2=-mu frac(k_1+k_2)Xk_1, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$



(3) $displaystyle fracd^2Ydy^2=-(lambda - mu) frac(k_1+k_2)Yk_2, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What if you now solve these ODE's? The first gives an exponential, the second and third gives sines and cosines. That gives you $T,X$ and $Y$. And then check if $XYT$ is a solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Wagemaker
    Mar 11 at 20:56













0












0








0





$begingroup$


My question is:



How do you use separation of variables on a PDE that has more than one constant in it?



All the examples I can find in my book/online only have one constant in it, like $$ fracpartial upartial t=kfracpartial^2
upartial x^2+kfracpartial^2 upartial y^2$$



Which then means only one of the resultant ODEs has $k$ in it. If there is more than one constant, what do you do? Still use separation of variables? My attempt is below the question.



The problem I am working on is:




Solve



$displaystyle fracpartial upartial t=k_1fracpartial^2
upartial x^2+k_2fracpartial^2 upartial y^2$



on a rectangle $(0 lt x lt L, 0 lt y lt H)$ subject to



$displaystyle u(0,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,0,t)=0$



$displaystyle u(0,y,0)=alpha(x,y)$



$displaystyle u(L,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,H,t)=0$




What I have done so far:



Let $u(x,t)=X(x)Y(y)T(t)$. Then using separation of variables we have:



(1) $displaystyle fracd Td t=-lambda(k_1+k_2)T, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$



(2) $displaystyle fracd^2Xdx^2=-mu frac(k_1+k_2)Xk_1, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$



(3) $displaystyle fracd^2Ydy^2=-(lambda - mu) frac(k_1+k_2)Yk_2, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




My question is:



How do you use separation of variables on a PDE that has more than one constant in it?



All the examples I can find in my book/online only have one constant in it, like $$ fracpartial upartial t=kfracpartial^2
upartial x^2+kfracpartial^2 upartial y^2$$



Which then means only one of the resultant ODEs has $k$ in it. If there is more than one constant, what do you do? Still use separation of variables? My attempt is below the question.



The problem I am working on is:




Solve



$displaystyle fracpartial upartial t=k_1fracpartial^2
upartial x^2+k_2fracpartial^2 upartial y^2$



on a rectangle $(0 lt x lt L, 0 lt y lt H)$ subject to



$displaystyle u(0,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,0,t)=0$



$displaystyle u(0,y,0)=alpha(x,y)$



$displaystyle u(L,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,H,t)=0$




What I have done so far:



Let $u(x,t)=X(x)Y(y)T(t)$. Then using separation of variables we have:



(1) $displaystyle fracd Td t=-lambda(k_1+k_2)T, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$



(2) $displaystyle fracd^2Xdx^2=-mu frac(k_1+k_2)Xk_1, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$



(3) $displaystyle fracd^2Ydy^2=-(lambda - mu) frac(k_1+k_2)Yk_2, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$







pde boundary-value-problem heat-equation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 12 at 6:02









Dylan

13.9k31127




13.9k31127










asked Mar 11 at 20:13









LovesPeanutButterLovesPeanutButter

836




836







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What if you now solve these ODE's? The first gives an exponential, the second and third gives sines and cosines. That gives you $T,X$ and $Y$. And then check if $XYT$ is a solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Wagemaker
    Mar 11 at 20:56












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What if you now solve these ODE's? The first gives an exponential, the second and third gives sines and cosines. That gives you $T,X$ and $Y$. And then check if $XYT$ is a solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Wagemaker
    Mar 11 at 20:56







1




1




$begingroup$
What if you now solve these ODE's? The first gives an exponential, the second and third gives sines and cosines. That gives you $T,X$ and $Y$. And then check if $XYT$ is a solution?
$endgroup$
– Jens Wagemaker
Mar 11 at 20:56




$begingroup$
What if you now solve these ODE's? The first gives an exponential, the second and third gives sines and cosines. That gives you $T,X$ and $Y$. And then check if $XYT$ is a solution?
$endgroup$
– Jens Wagemaker
Mar 11 at 20:56










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

You could also change the order of the assignment of variables. In
$$
fracT'(t)T(t)=k_1fracX''(x)X(x)+k_2fracY''(y)Y(y)
$$

all terms must be constants, so that you can set $fracX''(x)X(x)=-λ$, $fracY''(y)Y(y)=-μ$ and thus in consequence $fracT'(t)T(t)=-(k_1λ+k_2μ)$. I think the expressions for the constants in this form are less complex.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So using this method, the three ODEs to solve become: (1) $displaystyle X''+lambda X=0, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$ (2) $displaystyle Y''+mu Y=0, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$ (3) $displaystyle T'+(k_1 lambda +k_2 mu)T=0, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – LovesPeanutButter
    Mar 11 at 21:48







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes up to the last condition. The IC for $T$ is the Fourier coefficient corresponding to $(λ,μ)$ in the expansion of the initial function $α$ in the eigenbasis.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 11 at 23:22










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144180%2fseparating-variables-in-a-pde-with-multiple-constants%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

You could also change the order of the assignment of variables. In
$$
fracT'(t)T(t)=k_1fracX''(x)X(x)+k_2fracY''(y)Y(y)
$$

all terms must be constants, so that you can set $fracX''(x)X(x)=-λ$, $fracY''(y)Y(y)=-μ$ and thus in consequence $fracT'(t)T(t)=-(k_1λ+k_2μ)$. I think the expressions for the constants in this form are less complex.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So using this method, the three ODEs to solve become: (1) $displaystyle X''+lambda X=0, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$ (2) $displaystyle Y''+mu Y=0, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$ (3) $displaystyle T'+(k_1 lambda +k_2 mu)T=0, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – LovesPeanutButter
    Mar 11 at 21:48







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes up to the last condition. The IC for $T$ is the Fourier coefficient corresponding to $(λ,μ)$ in the expansion of the initial function $α$ in the eigenbasis.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 11 at 23:22















2












$begingroup$

You could also change the order of the assignment of variables. In
$$
fracT'(t)T(t)=k_1fracX''(x)X(x)+k_2fracY''(y)Y(y)
$$

all terms must be constants, so that you can set $fracX''(x)X(x)=-λ$, $fracY''(y)Y(y)=-μ$ and thus in consequence $fracT'(t)T(t)=-(k_1λ+k_2μ)$. I think the expressions for the constants in this form are less complex.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So using this method, the three ODEs to solve become: (1) $displaystyle X''+lambda X=0, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$ (2) $displaystyle Y''+mu Y=0, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$ (3) $displaystyle T'+(k_1 lambda +k_2 mu)T=0, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – LovesPeanutButter
    Mar 11 at 21:48







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes up to the last condition. The IC for $T$ is the Fourier coefficient corresponding to $(λ,μ)$ in the expansion of the initial function $α$ in the eigenbasis.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 11 at 23:22













2












2








2





$begingroup$

You could also change the order of the assignment of variables. In
$$
fracT'(t)T(t)=k_1fracX''(x)X(x)+k_2fracY''(y)Y(y)
$$

all terms must be constants, so that you can set $fracX''(x)X(x)=-λ$, $fracY''(y)Y(y)=-μ$ and thus in consequence $fracT'(t)T(t)=-(k_1λ+k_2μ)$. I think the expressions for the constants in this form are less complex.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



You could also change the order of the assignment of variables. In
$$
fracT'(t)T(t)=k_1fracX''(x)X(x)+k_2fracY''(y)Y(y)
$$

all terms must be constants, so that you can set $fracX''(x)X(x)=-λ$, $fracY''(y)Y(y)=-μ$ and thus in consequence $fracT'(t)T(t)=-(k_1λ+k_2μ)$. I think the expressions for the constants in this form are less complex.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 11 at 21:08









LutzLLutzL

59.6k42057




59.6k42057











  • $begingroup$
    So using this method, the three ODEs to solve become: (1) $displaystyle X''+lambda X=0, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$ (2) $displaystyle Y''+mu Y=0, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$ (3) $displaystyle T'+(k_1 lambda +k_2 mu)T=0, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – LovesPeanutButter
    Mar 11 at 21:48







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes up to the last condition. The IC for $T$ is the Fourier coefficient corresponding to $(λ,μ)$ in the expansion of the initial function $α$ in the eigenbasis.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 11 at 23:22
















  • $begingroup$
    So using this method, the three ODEs to solve become: (1) $displaystyle X''+lambda X=0, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$ (2) $displaystyle Y''+mu Y=0, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$ (3) $displaystyle T'+(k_1 lambda +k_2 mu)T=0, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – LovesPeanutButter
    Mar 11 at 21:48







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes up to the last condition. The IC for $T$ is the Fourier coefficient corresponding to $(λ,μ)$ in the expansion of the initial function $α$ in the eigenbasis.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 11 at 23:22















$begingroup$
So using this method, the three ODEs to solve become: (1) $displaystyle X''+lambda X=0, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$ (2) $displaystyle Y''+mu Y=0, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$ (3) $displaystyle T'+(k_1 lambda +k_2 mu)T=0, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$ ?
$endgroup$
– LovesPeanutButter
Mar 11 at 21:48





$begingroup$
So using this method, the three ODEs to solve become: (1) $displaystyle X''+lambda X=0, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$ (2) $displaystyle Y''+mu Y=0, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$ (3) $displaystyle T'+(k_1 lambda +k_2 mu)T=0, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$ ?
$endgroup$
– LovesPeanutButter
Mar 11 at 21:48





1




1




$begingroup$
Yes up to the last condition. The IC for $T$ is the Fourier coefficient corresponding to $(λ,μ)$ in the expansion of the initial function $α$ in the eigenbasis.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Mar 11 at 23:22




$begingroup$
Yes up to the last condition. The IC for $T$ is the Fourier coefficient corresponding to $(λ,μ)$ in the expansion of the initial function $α$ in the eigenbasis.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Mar 11 at 23:22

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144180%2fseparating-variables-in-a-pde-with-multiple-constants%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers