Separating variables in a PDE with multiple constantsHow to solve this PDE?Solving one dimensonal PDESolving the Laplace equation in terms of exponential of hyperbolic trigonometric functionsPDE with periodic boundary conditionsSolving a PDE through separation of variablesPDE using separation of variablesUsing Laplace Transforms to solve a PDETextbook Example Solving Heat Conduction PDE Using Separation of VariablesProblem with satisfying Boundary conditions for 1D heat PDESolving PDE using separation of variables (Heat diffusion)

What exactly is this small puffer fish doing and how did it manage to accomplish such a feat?

Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?

What should tie a collection of short-stories together?

How can I track script which gives me "command not found" right after the login?

What has been your most complicated TikZ drawing?

What do Xenomorphs eat in the Alien series?

Are ETF trackers fundamentally better than individual stocks?

How to use deus ex machina safely?

Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats

How to deal with a cynical class?

What's the meaning of “spike” in the context of “adrenaline spike”?

How to write cleanly even if my character uses expletive language?

Brexit - No Deal Rejection

Should we release the security issues we found in our product as CVE or we can just update those on weekly release notes?

Can a druid choose the size of its wild shape beast?

Why one should not leave fingerprints on bulbs and plugs?

Do these spellcasting foci from Xanathar's Guide to Everything have to be held in a hand?

How to deal with taxi scam when on vacation?

Why does Bach not break the rules here?

Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?

How to terminate ping <dest> &

Does someone need to be connected to my network to sniff HTTP requests?

The difference between「N分で」and「後N分で」

How could a scammer know the apps on my phone / iTunes account?



Separating variables in a PDE with multiple constants


How to solve this PDE?Solving one dimensonal PDESolving the Laplace equation in terms of exponential of hyperbolic trigonometric functionsPDE with periodic boundary conditionsSolving a PDE through separation of variablesPDE using separation of variablesUsing Laplace Transforms to solve a PDETextbook Example Solving Heat Conduction PDE Using Separation of VariablesProblem with satisfying Boundary conditions for 1D heat PDESolving PDE using separation of variables (Heat diffusion)













0












$begingroup$


My question is:



How do you use separation of variables on a PDE that has more than one constant in it?



All the examples I can find in my book/online only have one constant in it, like $$ fracpartial upartial t=kfracpartial^2
upartial x^2+kfracpartial^2 upartial y^2$$



Which then means only one of the resultant ODEs has $k$ in it. If there is more than one constant, what do you do? Still use separation of variables? My attempt is below the question.



The problem I am working on is:




Solve



$displaystyle fracpartial upartial t=k_1fracpartial^2
upartial x^2+k_2fracpartial^2 upartial y^2$



on a rectangle $(0 lt x lt L, 0 lt y lt H)$ subject to



$displaystyle u(0,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,0,t)=0$



$displaystyle u(0,y,0)=alpha(x,y)$



$displaystyle u(L,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,H,t)=0$




What I have done so far:



Let $u(x,t)=X(x)Y(y)T(t)$. Then using separation of variables we have:



(1) $displaystyle fracd Td t=-lambda(k_1+k_2)T, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$



(2) $displaystyle fracd^2Xdx^2=-mu frac(k_1+k_2)Xk_1, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$



(3) $displaystyle fracd^2Ydy^2=-(lambda - mu) frac(k_1+k_2)Yk_2, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What if you now solve these ODE's? The first gives an exponential, the second and third gives sines and cosines. That gives you $T,X$ and $Y$. And then check if $XYT$ is a solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Wagemaker
    Mar 11 at 20:56















0












$begingroup$


My question is:



How do you use separation of variables on a PDE that has more than one constant in it?



All the examples I can find in my book/online only have one constant in it, like $$ fracpartial upartial t=kfracpartial^2
upartial x^2+kfracpartial^2 upartial y^2$$



Which then means only one of the resultant ODEs has $k$ in it. If there is more than one constant, what do you do? Still use separation of variables? My attempt is below the question.



The problem I am working on is:




Solve



$displaystyle fracpartial upartial t=k_1fracpartial^2
upartial x^2+k_2fracpartial^2 upartial y^2$



on a rectangle $(0 lt x lt L, 0 lt y lt H)$ subject to



$displaystyle u(0,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,0,t)=0$



$displaystyle u(0,y,0)=alpha(x,y)$



$displaystyle u(L,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,H,t)=0$




What I have done so far:



Let $u(x,t)=X(x)Y(y)T(t)$. Then using separation of variables we have:



(1) $displaystyle fracd Td t=-lambda(k_1+k_2)T, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$



(2) $displaystyle fracd^2Xdx^2=-mu frac(k_1+k_2)Xk_1, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$



(3) $displaystyle fracd^2Ydy^2=-(lambda - mu) frac(k_1+k_2)Yk_2, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What if you now solve these ODE's? The first gives an exponential, the second and third gives sines and cosines. That gives you $T,X$ and $Y$. And then check if $XYT$ is a solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Wagemaker
    Mar 11 at 20:56













0












0








0





$begingroup$


My question is:



How do you use separation of variables on a PDE that has more than one constant in it?



All the examples I can find in my book/online only have one constant in it, like $$ fracpartial upartial t=kfracpartial^2
upartial x^2+kfracpartial^2 upartial y^2$$



Which then means only one of the resultant ODEs has $k$ in it. If there is more than one constant, what do you do? Still use separation of variables? My attempt is below the question.



The problem I am working on is:




Solve



$displaystyle fracpartial upartial t=k_1fracpartial^2
upartial x^2+k_2fracpartial^2 upartial y^2$



on a rectangle $(0 lt x lt L, 0 lt y lt H)$ subject to



$displaystyle u(0,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,0,t)=0$



$displaystyle u(0,y,0)=alpha(x,y)$



$displaystyle u(L,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,H,t)=0$




What I have done so far:



Let $u(x,t)=X(x)Y(y)T(t)$. Then using separation of variables we have:



(1) $displaystyle fracd Td t=-lambda(k_1+k_2)T, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$



(2) $displaystyle fracd^2Xdx^2=-mu frac(k_1+k_2)Xk_1, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$



(3) $displaystyle fracd^2Ydy^2=-(lambda - mu) frac(k_1+k_2)Yk_2, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




My question is:



How do you use separation of variables on a PDE that has more than one constant in it?



All the examples I can find in my book/online only have one constant in it, like $$ fracpartial upartial t=kfracpartial^2
upartial x^2+kfracpartial^2 upartial y^2$$



Which then means only one of the resultant ODEs has $k$ in it. If there is more than one constant, what do you do? Still use separation of variables? My attempt is below the question.



The problem I am working on is:




Solve



$displaystyle fracpartial upartial t=k_1fracpartial^2
upartial x^2+k_2fracpartial^2 upartial y^2$



on a rectangle $(0 lt x lt L, 0 lt y lt H)$ subject to



$displaystyle u(0,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,0,t)=0$



$displaystyle u(0,y,0)=alpha(x,y)$



$displaystyle u(L,y,t)=0, fracpartial upartial y(x,H,t)=0$




What I have done so far:



Let $u(x,t)=X(x)Y(y)T(t)$. Then using separation of variables we have:



(1) $displaystyle fracd Td t=-lambda(k_1+k_2)T, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$



(2) $displaystyle fracd^2Xdx^2=-mu frac(k_1+k_2)Xk_1, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$



(3) $displaystyle fracd^2Ydy^2=-(lambda - mu) frac(k_1+k_2)Yk_2, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$







pde boundary-value-problem heat-equation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 12 at 6:02









Dylan

13.9k31127




13.9k31127










asked Mar 11 at 20:13









LovesPeanutButterLovesPeanutButter

836




836







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What if you now solve these ODE's? The first gives an exponential, the second and third gives sines and cosines. That gives you $T,X$ and $Y$. And then check if $XYT$ is a solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Wagemaker
    Mar 11 at 20:56












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What if you now solve these ODE's? The first gives an exponential, the second and third gives sines and cosines. That gives you $T,X$ and $Y$. And then check if $XYT$ is a solution?
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Wagemaker
    Mar 11 at 20:56







1




1




$begingroup$
What if you now solve these ODE's? The first gives an exponential, the second and third gives sines and cosines. That gives you $T,X$ and $Y$. And then check if $XYT$ is a solution?
$endgroup$
– Jens Wagemaker
Mar 11 at 20:56




$begingroup$
What if you now solve these ODE's? The first gives an exponential, the second and third gives sines and cosines. That gives you $T,X$ and $Y$. And then check if $XYT$ is a solution?
$endgroup$
– Jens Wagemaker
Mar 11 at 20:56










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

You could also change the order of the assignment of variables. In
$$
fracT'(t)T(t)=k_1fracX''(x)X(x)+k_2fracY''(y)Y(y)
$$

all terms must be constants, so that you can set $fracX''(x)X(x)=-λ$, $fracY''(y)Y(y)=-μ$ and thus in consequence $fracT'(t)T(t)=-(k_1λ+k_2μ)$. I think the expressions for the constants in this form are less complex.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So using this method, the three ODEs to solve become: (1) $displaystyle X''+lambda X=0, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$ (2) $displaystyle Y''+mu Y=0, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$ (3) $displaystyle T'+(k_1 lambda +k_2 mu)T=0, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – LovesPeanutButter
    Mar 11 at 21:48







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes up to the last condition. The IC for $T$ is the Fourier coefficient corresponding to $(λ,μ)$ in the expansion of the initial function $α$ in the eigenbasis.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 11 at 23:22










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144180%2fseparating-variables-in-a-pde-with-multiple-constants%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

You could also change the order of the assignment of variables. In
$$
fracT'(t)T(t)=k_1fracX''(x)X(x)+k_2fracY''(y)Y(y)
$$

all terms must be constants, so that you can set $fracX''(x)X(x)=-λ$, $fracY''(y)Y(y)=-μ$ and thus in consequence $fracT'(t)T(t)=-(k_1λ+k_2μ)$. I think the expressions for the constants in this form are less complex.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So using this method, the three ODEs to solve become: (1) $displaystyle X''+lambda X=0, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$ (2) $displaystyle Y''+mu Y=0, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$ (3) $displaystyle T'+(k_1 lambda +k_2 mu)T=0, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – LovesPeanutButter
    Mar 11 at 21:48







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes up to the last condition. The IC for $T$ is the Fourier coefficient corresponding to $(λ,μ)$ in the expansion of the initial function $α$ in the eigenbasis.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 11 at 23:22















2












$begingroup$

You could also change the order of the assignment of variables. In
$$
fracT'(t)T(t)=k_1fracX''(x)X(x)+k_2fracY''(y)Y(y)
$$

all terms must be constants, so that you can set $fracX''(x)X(x)=-λ$, $fracY''(y)Y(y)=-μ$ and thus in consequence $fracT'(t)T(t)=-(k_1λ+k_2μ)$. I think the expressions for the constants in this form are less complex.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So using this method, the three ODEs to solve become: (1) $displaystyle X''+lambda X=0, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$ (2) $displaystyle Y''+mu Y=0, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$ (3) $displaystyle T'+(k_1 lambda +k_2 mu)T=0, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – LovesPeanutButter
    Mar 11 at 21:48







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes up to the last condition. The IC for $T$ is the Fourier coefficient corresponding to $(λ,μ)$ in the expansion of the initial function $α$ in the eigenbasis.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 11 at 23:22













2












2








2





$begingroup$

You could also change the order of the assignment of variables. In
$$
fracT'(t)T(t)=k_1fracX''(x)X(x)+k_2fracY''(y)Y(y)
$$

all terms must be constants, so that you can set $fracX''(x)X(x)=-λ$, $fracY''(y)Y(y)=-μ$ and thus in consequence $fracT'(t)T(t)=-(k_1λ+k_2μ)$. I think the expressions for the constants in this form are less complex.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



You could also change the order of the assignment of variables. In
$$
fracT'(t)T(t)=k_1fracX''(x)X(x)+k_2fracY''(y)Y(y)
$$

all terms must be constants, so that you can set $fracX''(x)X(x)=-λ$, $fracY''(y)Y(y)=-μ$ and thus in consequence $fracT'(t)T(t)=-(k_1λ+k_2μ)$. I think the expressions for the constants in this form are less complex.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 11 at 21:08









LutzLLutzL

59.6k42057




59.6k42057











  • $begingroup$
    So using this method, the three ODEs to solve become: (1) $displaystyle X''+lambda X=0, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$ (2) $displaystyle Y''+mu Y=0, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$ (3) $displaystyle T'+(k_1 lambda +k_2 mu)T=0, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – LovesPeanutButter
    Mar 11 at 21:48







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes up to the last condition. The IC for $T$ is the Fourier coefficient corresponding to $(λ,μ)$ in the expansion of the initial function $α$ in the eigenbasis.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 11 at 23:22
















  • $begingroup$
    So using this method, the three ODEs to solve become: (1) $displaystyle X''+lambda X=0, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$ (2) $displaystyle Y''+mu Y=0, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$ (3) $displaystyle T'+(k_1 lambda +k_2 mu)T=0, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – LovesPeanutButter
    Mar 11 at 21:48







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes up to the last condition. The IC for $T$ is the Fourier coefficient corresponding to $(λ,μ)$ in the expansion of the initial function $α$ in the eigenbasis.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 11 at 23:22















$begingroup$
So using this method, the three ODEs to solve become: (1) $displaystyle X''+lambda X=0, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$ (2) $displaystyle Y''+mu Y=0, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$ (3) $displaystyle T'+(k_1 lambda +k_2 mu)T=0, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$ ?
$endgroup$
– LovesPeanutButter
Mar 11 at 21:48





$begingroup$
So using this method, the three ODEs to solve become: (1) $displaystyle X''+lambda X=0, text BCs: X(0)=0, X(L)=0$ (2) $displaystyle Y''+mu Y=0, text BCs: Y'(0)=0, Y'(H)=0$ (3) $displaystyle T'+(k_1 lambda +k_2 mu)T=0, text IC: T(0)=alpha(x,y)$ ?
$endgroup$
– LovesPeanutButter
Mar 11 at 21:48





1




1




$begingroup$
Yes up to the last condition. The IC for $T$ is the Fourier coefficient corresponding to $(λ,μ)$ in the expansion of the initial function $α$ in the eigenbasis.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Mar 11 at 23:22




$begingroup$
Yes up to the last condition. The IC for $T$ is the Fourier coefficient corresponding to $(λ,μ)$ in the expansion of the initial function $α$ in the eigenbasis.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Mar 11 at 23:22

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144180%2fseparating-variables-in-a-pde-with-multiple-constants%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye