Can the functions from reals to complex numbers be treated as functions from complex numbers to complex numbers?Is this out-of-context theorem true?Question regarding assumptions in Morera's theorem and conditions for existence of antiderivative.Showing a complex function defined as an integral is holomorphicGeometric interpretation of complex path integralHolomorphic function definition. Am I missing something very obvious?Help to prove this is an equivalence relationHow can I prove this $int_gammaf=-int_-gammaf$Is this complex analysis proof rigorous?Can we prove that $overlinez^2$ has no antiderivative without using Morera's Theorem?$lim_rtoinftyint_c-ir^c+irz^-lambda(log(z))^-1dz$

At what distance can a bugbear, holding a reach weapon, with Polearm Mastery, get their Opportunity Attack?

How can I ensure my trip to the UK will not have to be cancelled because of Brexit?

How to secure an aircraft at a transient parking space?

List elements digit difference sort

How many characters using PHB rules does it take to be able to have access to any PHB spell at the start of an adventuring day?

Does "Until when" sound natural for native speakers?

weren't playing vs didn't play

How can I get players to stop ignoring or overlooking the plot hooks I'm giving them?

Reversed Sudoku

What wound would be of little consequence to a biped but terrible for a quadruped?

What's the "normal" opposite of flautando?

Why would one plane in this picture not have gear down yet?

Why does liquid water form when we exhale on a mirror?

What are some noteworthy "mic-drop" moments in math?

Virginia employer terminated employee and wants signing bonus returned

What was the Kree's motivation in Captain Marvel?

Recommendation letter by significant other if you worked with them professionally?

When traveling to Europe from North America, do I need to purchase a different power strip?

Could you please stop shuffling the deck and play already?

In the quantum hamiltonian, why does kinetic energy turn into an operator while potential doesn't?

finite abelian groups tensor product.

'The literal of type int is out of range' con número enteros pequeños (2 dígitos)

Are there historical instances of the capital of a colonising country being temporarily or permanently shifted to one of its colonies?

Is "history" a male-biased word ("his+story")?



Can the functions from reals to complex numbers be treated as functions from complex numbers to complex numbers?


Is this out-of-context theorem true?Question regarding assumptions in Morera's theorem and conditions for existence of antiderivative.Showing a complex function defined as an integral is holomorphicGeometric interpretation of complex path integralHolomorphic function definition. Am I missing something very obvious?Help to prove this is an equivalence relationHow can I prove this $int_gammaf=-int_-gammaf$Is this complex analysis proof rigorous?Can we prove that $overlinez^2$ has no antiderivative without using Morera's Theorem?$lim_rtoinftyint_c-ir^c+irz^-lambda(log(z))^-1dz$













0












$begingroup$


I have recently started to learn complex analysis. This question popped into my head when I was reading the path integrals. Since we have to consider the derivative of path parametrization in the definition of path integral, and this parameterization has as its domain a closed real interval.



Writing it out, if the path $gamma(t): [a,b] rightarrow mathbbC$ is given by $gamma(t) = x(t) + i y(t)$, then why do we define its derivative w.r.t. $t$ as $x'(t) + iy'(t)$? Is it a consequence of treating it as a function from $mathbbC text to mathbbC$? I don't think that's true because it means it is precomposed with projection function $p(z) = Re(z)$, which isn't holomorphic. So is it so just by definition?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It's just like the derivative of a function $f:mathbbRtomathbbR^2$
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    But why do we have it like this? Is it just by definition? I ask this because being holomorphic and being differentiable in the multi-real sense are not the same thing. So this seems like an arbitrary thing to do: to throw in this thing in complex integrals and holomorphic functions.
    $endgroup$
    – student
    2 days ago
















0












$begingroup$


I have recently started to learn complex analysis. This question popped into my head when I was reading the path integrals. Since we have to consider the derivative of path parametrization in the definition of path integral, and this parameterization has as its domain a closed real interval.



Writing it out, if the path $gamma(t): [a,b] rightarrow mathbbC$ is given by $gamma(t) = x(t) + i y(t)$, then why do we define its derivative w.r.t. $t$ as $x'(t) + iy'(t)$? Is it a consequence of treating it as a function from $mathbbC text to mathbbC$? I don't think that's true because it means it is precomposed with projection function $p(z) = Re(z)$, which isn't holomorphic. So is it so just by definition?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It's just like the derivative of a function $f:mathbbRtomathbbR^2$
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    But why do we have it like this? Is it just by definition? I ask this because being holomorphic and being differentiable in the multi-real sense are not the same thing. So this seems like an arbitrary thing to do: to throw in this thing in complex integrals and holomorphic functions.
    $endgroup$
    – student
    2 days ago














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I have recently started to learn complex analysis. This question popped into my head when I was reading the path integrals. Since we have to consider the derivative of path parametrization in the definition of path integral, and this parameterization has as its domain a closed real interval.



Writing it out, if the path $gamma(t): [a,b] rightarrow mathbbC$ is given by $gamma(t) = x(t) + i y(t)$, then why do we define its derivative w.r.t. $t$ as $x'(t) + iy'(t)$? Is it a consequence of treating it as a function from $mathbbC text to mathbbC$? I don't think that's true because it means it is precomposed with projection function $p(z) = Re(z)$, which isn't holomorphic. So is it so just by definition?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have recently started to learn complex analysis. This question popped into my head when I was reading the path integrals. Since we have to consider the derivative of path parametrization in the definition of path integral, and this parameterization has as its domain a closed real interval.



Writing it out, if the path $gamma(t): [a,b] rightarrow mathbbC$ is given by $gamma(t) = x(t) + i y(t)$, then why do we define its derivative w.r.t. $t$ as $x'(t) + iy'(t)$? Is it a consequence of treating it as a function from $mathbbC text to mathbbC$? I don't think that's true because it means it is precomposed with projection function $p(z) = Re(z)$, which isn't holomorphic. So is it so just by definition?







complex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









studentstudent

497




497







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It's just like the derivative of a function $f:mathbbRtomathbbR^2$
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    But why do we have it like this? Is it just by definition? I ask this because being holomorphic and being differentiable in the multi-real sense are not the same thing. So this seems like an arbitrary thing to do: to throw in this thing in complex integrals and holomorphic functions.
    $endgroup$
    – student
    2 days ago













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It's just like the derivative of a function $f:mathbbRtomathbbR^2$
    $endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    But why do we have it like this? Is it just by definition? I ask this because being holomorphic and being differentiable in the multi-real sense are not the same thing. So this seems like an arbitrary thing to do: to throw in this thing in complex integrals and holomorphic functions.
    $endgroup$
    – student
    2 days ago








2




2




$begingroup$
It's just like the derivative of a function $f:mathbbRtomathbbR^2$
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
2 days ago





$begingroup$
It's just like the derivative of a function $f:mathbbRtomathbbR^2$
$endgroup$
– saulspatz
2 days ago













$begingroup$
But why do we have it like this? Is it just by definition? I ask this because being holomorphic and being differentiable in the multi-real sense are not the same thing. So this seems like an arbitrary thing to do: to throw in this thing in complex integrals and holomorphic functions.
$endgroup$
– student
2 days ago





$begingroup$
But why do we have it like this? Is it just by definition? I ask this because being holomorphic and being differentiable in the multi-real sense are not the same thing. So this seems like an arbitrary thing to do: to throw in this thing in complex integrals and holomorphic functions.
$endgroup$
– student
2 days ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

If $gamma(t) = x(t)+iy(t),$ then $$gamma(t+h)-gamma(t)over h = x(t+h-x(t)over h+iy(t+h)-y(t)over h$$ so taking limits gives $$gamma'(t)=x'(t)+iy'(t)$$



On the path $gamma,$ we are just looking at a function of a real variable, so holomorphy doesn't enter into it. Of course, when you start talking about the properties of the integral, you have to have holomorphy to get all the powerful theorems of complex variables.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3141552%2fcan-the-functions-from-reals-to-complex-numbers-be-treated-as-functions-from-com%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    If $gamma(t) = x(t)+iy(t),$ then $$gamma(t+h)-gamma(t)over h = x(t+h-x(t)over h+iy(t+h)-y(t)over h$$ so taking limits gives $$gamma'(t)=x'(t)+iy'(t)$$



    On the path $gamma,$ we are just looking at a function of a real variable, so holomorphy doesn't enter into it. Of course, when you start talking about the properties of the integral, you have to have holomorphy to get all the powerful theorems of complex variables.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      If $gamma(t) = x(t)+iy(t),$ then $$gamma(t+h)-gamma(t)over h = x(t+h-x(t)over h+iy(t+h)-y(t)over h$$ so taking limits gives $$gamma'(t)=x'(t)+iy'(t)$$



      On the path $gamma,$ we are just looking at a function of a real variable, so holomorphy doesn't enter into it. Of course, when you start talking about the properties of the integral, you have to have holomorphy to get all the powerful theorems of complex variables.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        If $gamma(t) = x(t)+iy(t),$ then $$gamma(t+h)-gamma(t)over h = x(t+h-x(t)over h+iy(t+h)-y(t)over h$$ so taking limits gives $$gamma'(t)=x'(t)+iy'(t)$$



        On the path $gamma,$ we are just looking at a function of a real variable, so holomorphy doesn't enter into it. Of course, when you start talking about the properties of the integral, you have to have holomorphy to get all the powerful theorems of complex variables.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        If $gamma(t) = x(t)+iy(t),$ then $$gamma(t+h)-gamma(t)over h = x(t+h-x(t)over h+iy(t+h)-y(t)over h$$ so taking limits gives $$gamma'(t)=x'(t)+iy'(t)$$



        On the path $gamma,$ we are just looking at a function of a real variable, so holomorphy doesn't enter into it. Of course, when you start talking about the properties of the integral, you have to have holomorphy to get all the powerful theorems of complex variables.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago

























        answered 2 days ago









        saulspatzsaulspatz

        17.2k31435




        17.2k31435



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3141552%2fcan-the-functions-from-reals-to-complex-numbers-be-treated-as-functions-from-com%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

            Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?

            Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576