Why is this integral $0$ when $x > t$?Fourier transform of cosine with square rootIntuitive reason for why many complex integrals vanish when the path is “blown-up”?A contour integral for Fourier transformCarry out integral by using Cauchy's theoremHow many poles have to be inside the contour?Is this Complex Integration correct?Using contour integration to solve this integralContour Integration to evaluate real Integral when there is no singularityIntegral of rational function - which contour to use?Why do we consider an infinite semicircular contour for the integral $int_-infty^inftyf(x) dx$Evaluating $int_-infty^inftyfrac1-acosh(alpha x)(cosh(alpha x)-a)^2cos(beta x),dx$

weren't playing vs didn't play

'The literal of type int is out of range' con número enteros pequeños (2 dígitos)

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god exists

Contract Factories

In the late 1940’s to early 1950’s what technology was available that could melt a LOT of ice?

Does a warlock using the Darkness/Devil's Sight combo still have advantage on ranged attacks against a target outside the Darkness?

Plausibility of Mushroom Buildings

Warn me when the equation number is pushed to the next line

Should I tell my boss the work he did was worthless

Could you please stop shuffling the deck and play already?

Declaring and defining template, and specialising them

Conservation of Mass and Energy

How can I get players to stop ignoring or overlooking the plot hooks I'm giving them?

What Happens when Passenger Refuses to Fly Boeing 737 Max?

Was Luke Skywalker the leader of the Rebel forces on Hoth?

What are the threaded holes in Manfrotto camera brackets?

Single word request: Harming the benefactor

How do I express some one as a black person?

Vocabulary for giving just numbers, not a full answer

Am I not good enough for you?

Is it "Vierergruppe" or "Viergruppe", or is there a distinction?

Bash script should only kill those instances of another script's that it has launched

They call me Inspector Morse

Does the nature of the Apocalypse in The Umbrella Academy change from the first to the last episode?



Why is this integral $0$ when $x > t$?


Fourier transform of cosine with square rootIntuitive reason for why many complex integrals vanish when the path is “blown-up”?A contour integral for Fourier transformCarry out integral by using Cauchy's theoremHow many poles have to be inside the contour?Is this Complex Integration correct?Using contour integration to solve this integralContour Integration to evaluate real Integral when there is no singularityIntegral of rational function - which contour to use?Why do we consider an infinite semicircular contour for the integral $int_-infty^inftyf(x) dx$Evaluating $int_-infty^inftyfrac1-acosh(alpha x)(cosh(alpha x)-a)^2cos(beta x),dx$













0












$begingroup$


Consider the integral



$$
I equiv int_-infty^infty dp frac1sqrtp^2 + m^2 sin(t sqrtp^2 + m^2 ) e^i p x.
$$

It appears to me that when $x > 0$ and $x > t$ the above integral is $0$. First, rewrite it as
$$
I = fraci2 int_-infty^infty dp frac1sqrtp^2 + m^2 (e^-itsqrtp^2 + m^2 - e^itsqrtp^2 + m^2) e^i p x.
$$



Now consider deforming the $p$ integral on the complex plane. If $p$ has a large positive imaginary part, then the integrand goes to zero as long as $x > t$. Because the integrand has no poles, this allows us to close the contour with a semi circle in the upper half plane. Because there are no poles, this integral is then $0$.



I am not asking for a rigorous proof of why $I = 0$ when $x > t$ using complex analysis, because I think the proof I sketched above is right. What does confuse me is that, from its definition, nothing special appears to happen to $I$ when $x$ goes from being less than $t$ to being greater than $t$. What am I looking for is a satisfying explanation for why the value of this integral changes dramatically in the $x > t$ and the $x < t$ cases, just by using the properties of the $p$ integral along the real axis.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I'm guessing this has to do with the fact that $mathcalF[sin(x)/x]$ is a box function.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Are you assuming $tge0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, $x>0$ and $t > 0$
    $endgroup$
    – user1379857
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @user1379857, in that case it would suffice to say $xgt tgt0$ (but $|x|gt|t|$ might be better).
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    2 days ago















0












$begingroup$


Consider the integral



$$
I equiv int_-infty^infty dp frac1sqrtp^2 + m^2 sin(t sqrtp^2 + m^2 ) e^i p x.
$$

It appears to me that when $x > 0$ and $x > t$ the above integral is $0$. First, rewrite it as
$$
I = fraci2 int_-infty^infty dp frac1sqrtp^2 + m^2 (e^-itsqrtp^2 + m^2 - e^itsqrtp^2 + m^2) e^i p x.
$$



Now consider deforming the $p$ integral on the complex plane. If $p$ has a large positive imaginary part, then the integrand goes to zero as long as $x > t$. Because the integrand has no poles, this allows us to close the contour with a semi circle in the upper half plane. Because there are no poles, this integral is then $0$.



I am not asking for a rigorous proof of why $I = 0$ when $x > t$ using complex analysis, because I think the proof I sketched above is right. What does confuse me is that, from its definition, nothing special appears to happen to $I$ when $x$ goes from being less than $t$ to being greater than $t$. What am I looking for is a satisfying explanation for why the value of this integral changes dramatically in the $x > t$ and the $x < t$ cases, just by using the properties of the $p$ integral along the real axis.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I'm guessing this has to do with the fact that $mathcalF[sin(x)/x]$ is a box function.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Are you assuming $tge0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, $x>0$ and $t > 0$
    $endgroup$
    – user1379857
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @user1379857, in that case it would suffice to say $xgt tgt0$ (but $|x|gt|t|$ might be better).
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    2 days ago













0












0








0





$begingroup$


Consider the integral



$$
I equiv int_-infty^infty dp frac1sqrtp^2 + m^2 sin(t sqrtp^2 + m^2 ) e^i p x.
$$

It appears to me that when $x > 0$ and $x > t$ the above integral is $0$. First, rewrite it as
$$
I = fraci2 int_-infty^infty dp frac1sqrtp^2 + m^2 (e^-itsqrtp^2 + m^2 - e^itsqrtp^2 + m^2) e^i p x.
$$



Now consider deforming the $p$ integral on the complex plane. If $p$ has a large positive imaginary part, then the integrand goes to zero as long as $x > t$. Because the integrand has no poles, this allows us to close the contour with a semi circle in the upper half plane. Because there are no poles, this integral is then $0$.



I am not asking for a rigorous proof of why $I = 0$ when $x > t$ using complex analysis, because I think the proof I sketched above is right. What does confuse me is that, from its definition, nothing special appears to happen to $I$ when $x$ goes from being less than $t$ to being greater than $t$. What am I looking for is a satisfying explanation for why the value of this integral changes dramatically in the $x > t$ and the $x < t$ cases, just by using the properties of the $p$ integral along the real axis.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Consider the integral



$$
I equiv int_-infty^infty dp frac1sqrtp^2 + m^2 sin(t sqrtp^2 + m^2 ) e^i p x.
$$

It appears to me that when $x > 0$ and $x > t$ the above integral is $0$. First, rewrite it as
$$
I = fraci2 int_-infty^infty dp frac1sqrtp^2 + m^2 (e^-itsqrtp^2 + m^2 - e^itsqrtp^2 + m^2) e^i p x.
$$



Now consider deforming the $p$ integral on the complex plane. If $p$ has a large positive imaginary part, then the integrand goes to zero as long as $x > t$. Because the integrand has no poles, this allows us to close the contour with a semi circle in the upper half plane. Because there are no poles, this integral is then $0$.



I am not asking for a rigorous proof of why $I = 0$ when $x > t$ using complex analysis, because I think the proof I sketched above is right. What does confuse me is that, from its definition, nothing special appears to happen to $I$ when $x$ goes from being less than $t$ to being greater than $t$. What am I looking for is a satisfying explanation for why the value of this integral changes dramatically in the $x > t$ and the $x < t$ cases, just by using the properties of the $p$ integral along the real axis.







integration complex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









user1379857user1379857

1786




1786











  • $begingroup$
    I'm guessing this has to do with the fact that $mathcalF[sin(x)/x]$ is a box function.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Are you assuming $tge0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, $x>0$ and $t > 0$
    $endgroup$
    – user1379857
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @user1379857, in that case it would suffice to say $xgt tgt0$ (but $|x|gt|t|$ might be better).
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    I'm guessing this has to do with the fact that $mathcalF[sin(x)/x]$ is a box function.
    $endgroup$
    – eyeballfrog
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Are you assuming $tge0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, $x>0$ and $t > 0$
    $endgroup$
    – user1379857
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @user1379857, in that case it would suffice to say $xgt tgt0$ (but $|x|gt|t|$ might be better).
    $endgroup$
    – Barry Cipra
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
I'm guessing this has to do with the fact that $mathcalF[sin(x)/x]$ is a box function.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
2 days ago





$begingroup$
I'm guessing this has to do with the fact that $mathcalF[sin(x)/x]$ is a box function.
$endgroup$
– eyeballfrog
2 days ago













$begingroup$
Are you assuming $tge0$?
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Are you assuming $tge0$?
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
2 days ago












$begingroup$
Yes, $x>0$ and $t > 0$
$endgroup$
– user1379857
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Yes, $x>0$ and $t > 0$
$endgroup$
– user1379857
2 days ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@user1379857, in that case it would suffice to say $xgt tgt0$ (but $|x|gt|t|$ might be better).
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
2 days ago




$begingroup$
@user1379857, in that case it would suffice to say $xgt tgt0$ (but $|x|gt|t|$ might be better).
$endgroup$
– Barry Cipra
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

First, let's use the symmetry of the integrand to remove the complex exponential
beginmultline
I = 2int_0^infty fracsinleft(tsqrtp^2+m^2right)sqrtp^2+m^2cosleft(xpright)dp \ = int_0^infty fracsinleft(xp+tsqrtp^2+m^2right)sqrtp^2+m^2dp+int_0^infty fracsinleft(tsqrtp^2+m^2- xpright)sqrtp^2+m^2dp \
=int_-infty^inftyfracsin(xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2)sqrtp^2+m^2dp
endmultline

Now, let's look at the argument of that sine function. If $|x| > |t|$, then it's a monotonic function. We can make a simple substitution $u = xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2$, and doing the algebra gives
$$
I = int_-infty^inftyfracsin(u)sqrtu^2+m^2(x^2-t^2) = 0,
$$

since the integrand is odd.



On the other hand, if $|t| > |x|$, the argument of the sine function is not monotonic. It achieves a minimum at $p_0 = -mx/sqrtt^2-x^2$ with value $u_0 = msqrtt^2-x^2$. So we have to split the integral at $p_0$, then do the substitution $u = xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2$. The algebra ends up being the same as before, but because of the different limits of integration, you get
$$
I = 2int_msqrtt^2-x^2^infty fracsin(u)sqrtu^2-m^2(t^2-x^2) = pi J_0left(msqrtt^2-x^2right)
$$

where $J_0$ is a Bessel function.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    If we define the Fourier transform of a function 𝑓 and its inverse as
    $$mathcal F(f)(omega)=int_mathbb Rf(x)e^-jomega xdx ,,,text and ,,, f(x)=frac 1 2piint_mathbb R mathcal F(f)(omega)e^jxomegadomega$$



    Then, what you're looking for the inverse Fourier transform of $$g(omega)=frac2pisqrtomega^2 + m^2 sin(t sqrtomega^2 + m^2 )$$



    It turns out that function has a compact support, more precisely its support is $[-|t|, |t|]$. Indeed, according to this question, the inverse Fourier transform of $g$ is
    $$f(x)= left{beginarraycc
    CJ_0left(msqrtt^2-x^2right) & text if 0 < |x| < |t| \
    0 & text if |t| < |x| < +infty
    endarrayright.$$

    Where $C$ is a constant and $J_0$ is the first Bessel function of the first kind.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3141698%2fwhy-is-this-integral-0-when-x-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      First, let's use the symmetry of the integrand to remove the complex exponential
      beginmultline
      I = 2int_0^infty fracsinleft(tsqrtp^2+m^2right)sqrtp^2+m^2cosleft(xpright)dp \ = int_0^infty fracsinleft(xp+tsqrtp^2+m^2right)sqrtp^2+m^2dp+int_0^infty fracsinleft(tsqrtp^2+m^2- xpright)sqrtp^2+m^2dp \
      =int_-infty^inftyfracsin(xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2)sqrtp^2+m^2dp
      endmultline

      Now, let's look at the argument of that sine function. If $|x| > |t|$, then it's a monotonic function. We can make a simple substitution $u = xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2$, and doing the algebra gives
      $$
      I = int_-infty^inftyfracsin(u)sqrtu^2+m^2(x^2-t^2) = 0,
      $$

      since the integrand is odd.



      On the other hand, if $|t| > |x|$, the argument of the sine function is not monotonic. It achieves a minimum at $p_0 = -mx/sqrtt^2-x^2$ with value $u_0 = msqrtt^2-x^2$. So we have to split the integral at $p_0$, then do the substitution $u = xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2$. The algebra ends up being the same as before, but because of the different limits of integration, you get
      $$
      I = 2int_msqrtt^2-x^2^infty fracsin(u)sqrtu^2-m^2(t^2-x^2) = pi J_0left(msqrtt^2-x^2right)
      $$

      where $J_0$ is a Bessel function.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        1












        $begingroup$

        First, let's use the symmetry of the integrand to remove the complex exponential
        beginmultline
        I = 2int_0^infty fracsinleft(tsqrtp^2+m^2right)sqrtp^2+m^2cosleft(xpright)dp \ = int_0^infty fracsinleft(xp+tsqrtp^2+m^2right)sqrtp^2+m^2dp+int_0^infty fracsinleft(tsqrtp^2+m^2- xpright)sqrtp^2+m^2dp \
        =int_-infty^inftyfracsin(xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2)sqrtp^2+m^2dp
        endmultline

        Now, let's look at the argument of that sine function. If $|x| > |t|$, then it's a monotonic function. We can make a simple substitution $u = xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2$, and doing the algebra gives
        $$
        I = int_-infty^inftyfracsin(u)sqrtu^2+m^2(x^2-t^2) = 0,
        $$

        since the integrand is odd.



        On the other hand, if $|t| > |x|$, the argument of the sine function is not monotonic. It achieves a minimum at $p_0 = -mx/sqrtt^2-x^2$ with value $u_0 = msqrtt^2-x^2$. So we have to split the integral at $p_0$, then do the substitution $u = xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2$. The algebra ends up being the same as before, but because of the different limits of integration, you get
        $$
        I = 2int_msqrtt^2-x^2^infty fracsin(u)sqrtu^2-m^2(t^2-x^2) = pi J_0left(msqrtt^2-x^2right)
        $$

        where $J_0$ is a Bessel function.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          First, let's use the symmetry of the integrand to remove the complex exponential
          beginmultline
          I = 2int_0^infty fracsinleft(tsqrtp^2+m^2right)sqrtp^2+m^2cosleft(xpright)dp \ = int_0^infty fracsinleft(xp+tsqrtp^2+m^2right)sqrtp^2+m^2dp+int_0^infty fracsinleft(tsqrtp^2+m^2- xpright)sqrtp^2+m^2dp \
          =int_-infty^inftyfracsin(xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2)sqrtp^2+m^2dp
          endmultline

          Now, let's look at the argument of that sine function. If $|x| > |t|$, then it's a monotonic function. We can make a simple substitution $u = xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2$, and doing the algebra gives
          $$
          I = int_-infty^inftyfracsin(u)sqrtu^2+m^2(x^2-t^2) = 0,
          $$

          since the integrand is odd.



          On the other hand, if $|t| > |x|$, the argument of the sine function is not monotonic. It achieves a minimum at $p_0 = -mx/sqrtt^2-x^2$ with value $u_0 = msqrtt^2-x^2$. So we have to split the integral at $p_0$, then do the substitution $u = xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2$. The algebra ends up being the same as before, but because of the different limits of integration, you get
          $$
          I = 2int_msqrtt^2-x^2^infty fracsin(u)sqrtu^2-m^2(t^2-x^2) = pi J_0left(msqrtt^2-x^2right)
          $$

          where $J_0$ is a Bessel function.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          First, let's use the symmetry of the integrand to remove the complex exponential
          beginmultline
          I = 2int_0^infty fracsinleft(tsqrtp^2+m^2right)sqrtp^2+m^2cosleft(xpright)dp \ = int_0^infty fracsinleft(xp+tsqrtp^2+m^2right)sqrtp^2+m^2dp+int_0^infty fracsinleft(tsqrtp^2+m^2- xpright)sqrtp^2+m^2dp \
          =int_-infty^inftyfracsin(xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2)sqrtp^2+m^2dp
          endmultline

          Now, let's look at the argument of that sine function. If $|x| > |t|$, then it's a monotonic function. We can make a simple substitution $u = xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2$, and doing the algebra gives
          $$
          I = int_-infty^inftyfracsin(u)sqrtu^2+m^2(x^2-t^2) = 0,
          $$

          since the integrand is odd.



          On the other hand, if $|t| > |x|$, the argument of the sine function is not monotonic. It achieves a minimum at $p_0 = -mx/sqrtt^2-x^2$ with value $u_0 = msqrtt^2-x^2$. So we have to split the integral at $p_0$, then do the substitution $u = xp + tsqrtp^2+m^2$. The algebra ends up being the same as before, but because of the different limits of integration, you get
          $$
          I = 2int_msqrtt^2-x^2^infty fracsin(u)sqrtu^2-m^2(t^2-x^2) = pi J_0left(msqrtt^2-x^2right)
          $$

          where $J_0$ is a Bessel function.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          eyeballfrogeyeballfrog

          6,416629




          6,416629





















              1












              $begingroup$

              If we define the Fourier transform of a function 𝑓 and its inverse as
              $$mathcal F(f)(omega)=int_mathbb Rf(x)e^-jomega xdx ,,,text and ,,, f(x)=frac 1 2piint_mathbb R mathcal F(f)(omega)e^jxomegadomega$$



              Then, what you're looking for the inverse Fourier transform of $$g(omega)=frac2pisqrtomega^2 + m^2 sin(t sqrtomega^2 + m^2 )$$



              It turns out that function has a compact support, more precisely its support is $[-|t|, |t|]$. Indeed, according to this question, the inverse Fourier transform of $g$ is
              $$f(x)= left{beginarraycc
              CJ_0left(msqrtt^2-x^2right) & text if 0 < |x| < |t| \
              0 & text if |t| < |x| < +infty
              endarrayright.$$

              Where $C$ is a constant and $J_0$ is the first Bessel function of the first kind.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                If we define the Fourier transform of a function 𝑓 and its inverse as
                $$mathcal F(f)(omega)=int_mathbb Rf(x)e^-jomega xdx ,,,text and ,,, f(x)=frac 1 2piint_mathbb R mathcal F(f)(omega)e^jxomegadomega$$



                Then, what you're looking for the inverse Fourier transform of $$g(omega)=frac2pisqrtomega^2 + m^2 sin(t sqrtomega^2 + m^2 )$$



                It turns out that function has a compact support, more precisely its support is $[-|t|, |t|]$. Indeed, according to this question, the inverse Fourier transform of $g$ is
                $$f(x)= left{beginarraycc
                CJ_0left(msqrtt^2-x^2right) & text if 0 < |x| < |t| \
                0 & text if |t| < |x| < +infty
                endarrayright.$$

                Where $C$ is a constant and $J_0$ is the first Bessel function of the first kind.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  If we define the Fourier transform of a function 𝑓 and its inverse as
                  $$mathcal F(f)(omega)=int_mathbb Rf(x)e^-jomega xdx ,,,text and ,,, f(x)=frac 1 2piint_mathbb R mathcal F(f)(omega)e^jxomegadomega$$



                  Then, what you're looking for the inverse Fourier transform of $$g(omega)=frac2pisqrtomega^2 + m^2 sin(t sqrtomega^2 + m^2 )$$



                  It turns out that function has a compact support, more precisely its support is $[-|t|, |t|]$. Indeed, according to this question, the inverse Fourier transform of $g$ is
                  $$f(x)= left{beginarraycc
                  CJ_0left(msqrtt^2-x^2right) & text if 0 < |x| < |t| \
                  0 & text if |t| < |x| < +infty
                  endarrayright.$$

                  Where $C$ is a constant and $J_0$ is the first Bessel function of the first kind.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  If we define the Fourier transform of a function 𝑓 and its inverse as
                  $$mathcal F(f)(omega)=int_mathbb Rf(x)e^-jomega xdx ,,,text and ,,, f(x)=frac 1 2piint_mathbb R mathcal F(f)(omega)e^jxomegadomega$$



                  Then, what you're looking for the inverse Fourier transform of $$g(omega)=frac2pisqrtomega^2 + m^2 sin(t sqrtomega^2 + m^2 )$$



                  It turns out that function has a compact support, more precisely its support is $[-|t|, |t|]$. Indeed, according to this question, the inverse Fourier transform of $g$ is
                  $$f(x)= left{beginarraycc
                  CJ_0left(msqrtt^2-x^2right) & text if 0 < |x| < |t| \
                  0 & text if |t| < |x| < +infty
                  endarrayright.$$

                  Where $C$ is a constant and $J_0$ is the first Bessel function of the first kind.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  Stefan LafonStefan Lafon

                  2,92519




                  2,92519



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3141698%2fwhy-is-this-integral-0-when-x-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                      random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                      Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye