A functional equation defined on the real axis.Easy functional equationFunctional equation: $R(1/x)/x^2 = R(x) $Solving functional equation 1Functional Equation and totally multiplicative functionsFunctional equation extended solutionFunctional equation in $a,x,y$Mean Value theorem functional equationFunctional equation : $f(xf(y))=yf(x)$quadratic functional equation?Functional equation on $mathbbR^+$

Do I really need to have a scientific explanation for my premise?

Why does the negative sign arise in this thermodynamic relation?

What is the magic ball of every day?

How to draw cubes in a 3 dimensional plane

Do items de-spawn in Diablo?

Could you please stop shuffling the deck and play already?

Examples of a statistic that is not independent of sample's distribution?

Plausibility of Mushroom Buildings

Why is computing ridge regression with a Cholesky decomposition much quicker than using SVD?

Is it "Vierergruppe" or "Viergruppe", or is there a distinction?

What are actual Tesla M60 models used by AWS?

When traveling to Europe from North America, do I need to purchase a different power strip?

Is it necessary to separate DC power cables and data cables?

Bash script should only kill those instances of another script's that it has launched

Makefile strange variable substitution

Virginia employer terminated employee and wants signing bonus returned

Conservation of Mass and Energy

Is "conspicuously missing" or "conspicuously" the subject of this sentence?

Are there historical instances of the capital of a colonising country being temporarily or permanently shifted to one of its colonies?

Can one live in the U.S. and not use a credit card?

Why would one plane in this picture not have gear down yet?

weren't playing vs didn't play

Definition of Statistic

How to detect if C code (which needs 'extern C') is compiled in C++



A functional equation defined on the real axis.


Easy functional equationFunctional equation: $R(1/x)/x^2 = R(x) $Solving functional equation 1Functional Equation and totally multiplicative functionsFunctional equation extended solutionFunctional equation in $a,x,y$Mean Value theorem functional equationFunctional equation : $f(xf(y))=yf(x)$quadratic functional equation?Functional equation on $mathbbR^+$













2












$begingroup$


$$
f: mathbbR to mathbbRqquad fracf(x+y)x+y = fracf(x)-f(y)x-y, qquad forall x,yin mathbbR, left|xright| neq left|yright|
$$



Can I prove anything interesting about this function? I need to find it.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from furfur ending ending at 2019-03-15 15:41:32Z">in 4 days.


This question has not received enough attention.











  • 4




    $begingroup$
    $f(x)=ax^2$ is also a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Mar 6 at 8:26






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And thus so is $f(x) = ax^2+bx$. Indeed, any linear combination of solutions is again a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Greg Martin
    Mar 6 at 8:35















2












$begingroup$


$$
f: mathbbR to mathbbRqquad fracf(x+y)x+y = fracf(x)-f(y)x-y, qquad forall x,yin mathbbR, left|xright| neq left|yright|
$$



Can I prove anything interesting about this function? I need to find it.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from furfur ending ending at 2019-03-15 15:41:32Z">in 4 days.


This question has not received enough attention.











  • 4




    $begingroup$
    $f(x)=ax^2$ is also a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Mar 6 at 8:26






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And thus so is $f(x) = ax^2+bx$. Indeed, any linear combination of solutions is again a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Greg Martin
    Mar 6 at 8:35













2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


$$
f: mathbbR to mathbbRqquad fracf(x+y)x+y = fracf(x)-f(y)x-y, qquad forall x,yin mathbbR, left|xright| neq left|yright|
$$



Can I prove anything interesting about this function? I need to find it.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




$$
f: mathbbR to mathbbRqquad fracf(x+y)x+y = fracf(x)-f(y)x-y, qquad forall x,yin mathbbR, left|xright| neq left|yright|
$$



Can I prove anything interesting about this function? I need to find it.







functions functional-equations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 8 at 15:40







furfur

















asked Mar 6 at 8:20









furfurfurfur

509




509






This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from furfur ending ending at 2019-03-15 15:41:32Z">in 4 days.


This question has not received enough attention.








This question has an open bounty worth +50
reputation from furfur ending ending at 2019-03-15 15:41:32Z">in 4 days.


This question has not received enough attention.









  • 4




    $begingroup$
    $f(x)=ax^2$ is also a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Mar 6 at 8:26






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And thus so is $f(x) = ax^2+bx$. Indeed, any linear combination of solutions is again a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Greg Martin
    Mar 6 at 8:35












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    $f(x)=ax^2$ is also a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Mar 6 at 8:26






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    And thus so is $f(x) = ax^2+bx$. Indeed, any linear combination of solutions is again a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – Greg Martin
    Mar 6 at 8:35







4




4




$begingroup$
$f(x)=ax^2$ is also a solution.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 6 at 8:26




$begingroup$
$f(x)=ax^2$ is also a solution.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 6 at 8:26




2




2




$begingroup$
And thus so is $f(x) = ax^2+bx$. Indeed, any linear combination of solutions is again a solution.
$endgroup$
– Greg Martin
Mar 6 at 8:35




$begingroup$
And thus so is $f(x) = ax^2+bx$. Indeed, any linear combination of solutions is again a solution.
$endgroup$
– Greg Martin
Mar 6 at 8:35










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

See Aczél or Schwaiger, where there is a misprint: $h(x_1,ldots,x_n)$ should read as $$h(x_1+ldots+x_n).$$
In the first paper it is shown that $f$ is a solution of the functions equation in question iff $f(x)=ax^2+bx$ for all $x$ with arbitrary constants $a,b$. The second reference gives certain generalisations.



Edit The results mentioned concerns different equations.
The somehow simpler one $fracf(x)-f(y)x-y=g(x+y)$ for $xnot=y$ and certain generalisations.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    As it stands this is a link-only answer, and the second article seems to be behind a paywall. Also, both seem to cover a broader class of functions. Including at least a summary of the relevant results seems appropriate.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Mar 6 at 12:05











  • $begingroup$
    This doesn’t solve my problem though.. in that link answer he makes x=-y to prove function h is odd. I can’t do x=-y in my problem, as the denominator cannot be 0.
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    Mar 6 at 13:18










  • $begingroup$
    First you should rewrite the equation by multiplying both sides with $(x+y)(x-y)$. The resulting equation holds true also if $x=y$ or $x=-y$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Schwaiger
    Mar 6 at 17:35










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. That’s true. But in my case the function “h” (the one in the solution by Aczel) is equal to f(x+y)/(x+y) which is not defined for x=-y. So I can’t have an h(0). This is means h is defined on R*. So I can’t prove h is odd.
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    Mar 6 at 18:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @JensSchwaiger you should delete this "answer"
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3137257%2fa-functional-equation-defined-on-the-real-axis%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

See Aczél or Schwaiger, where there is a misprint: $h(x_1,ldots,x_n)$ should read as $$h(x_1+ldots+x_n).$$
In the first paper it is shown that $f$ is a solution of the functions equation in question iff $f(x)=ax^2+bx$ for all $x$ with arbitrary constants $a,b$. The second reference gives certain generalisations.



Edit The results mentioned concerns different equations.
The somehow simpler one $fracf(x)-f(y)x-y=g(x+y)$ for $xnot=y$ and certain generalisations.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    As it stands this is a link-only answer, and the second article seems to be behind a paywall. Also, both seem to cover a broader class of functions. Including at least a summary of the relevant results seems appropriate.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Mar 6 at 12:05











  • $begingroup$
    This doesn’t solve my problem though.. in that link answer he makes x=-y to prove function h is odd. I can’t do x=-y in my problem, as the denominator cannot be 0.
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    Mar 6 at 13:18










  • $begingroup$
    First you should rewrite the equation by multiplying both sides with $(x+y)(x-y)$. The resulting equation holds true also if $x=y$ or $x=-y$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Schwaiger
    Mar 6 at 17:35










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. That’s true. But in my case the function “h” (the one in the solution by Aczel) is equal to f(x+y)/(x+y) which is not defined for x=-y. So I can’t have an h(0). This is means h is defined on R*. So I can’t prove h is odd.
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    Mar 6 at 18:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @JensSchwaiger you should delete this "answer"
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago















0












$begingroup$

See Aczél or Schwaiger, where there is a misprint: $h(x_1,ldots,x_n)$ should read as $$h(x_1+ldots+x_n).$$
In the first paper it is shown that $f$ is a solution of the functions equation in question iff $f(x)=ax^2+bx$ for all $x$ with arbitrary constants $a,b$. The second reference gives certain generalisations.



Edit The results mentioned concerns different equations.
The somehow simpler one $fracf(x)-f(y)x-y=g(x+y)$ for $xnot=y$ and certain generalisations.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    As it stands this is a link-only answer, and the second article seems to be behind a paywall. Also, both seem to cover a broader class of functions. Including at least a summary of the relevant results seems appropriate.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Mar 6 at 12:05











  • $begingroup$
    This doesn’t solve my problem though.. in that link answer he makes x=-y to prove function h is odd. I can’t do x=-y in my problem, as the denominator cannot be 0.
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    Mar 6 at 13:18










  • $begingroup$
    First you should rewrite the equation by multiplying both sides with $(x+y)(x-y)$. The resulting equation holds true also if $x=y$ or $x=-y$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Schwaiger
    Mar 6 at 17:35










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. That’s true. But in my case the function “h” (the one in the solution by Aczel) is equal to f(x+y)/(x+y) which is not defined for x=-y. So I can’t have an h(0). This is means h is defined on R*. So I can’t prove h is odd.
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    Mar 6 at 18:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @JensSchwaiger you should delete this "answer"
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago













0












0








0





$begingroup$

See Aczél or Schwaiger, where there is a misprint: $h(x_1,ldots,x_n)$ should read as $$h(x_1+ldots+x_n).$$
In the first paper it is shown that $f$ is a solution of the functions equation in question iff $f(x)=ax^2+bx$ for all $x$ with arbitrary constants $a,b$. The second reference gives certain generalisations.



Edit The results mentioned concerns different equations.
The somehow simpler one $fracf(x)-f(y)x-y=g(x+y)$ for $xnot=y$ and certain generalisations.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



See Aczél or Schwaiger, where there is a misprint: $h(x_1,ldots,x_n)$ should read as $$h(x_1+ldots+x_n).$$
In the first paper it is shown that $f$ is a solution of the functions equation in question iff $f(x)=ax^2+bx$ for all $x$ with arbitrary constants $a,b$. The second reference gives certain generalisations.



Edit The results mentioned concerns different equations.
The somehow simpler one $fracf(x)-f(y)x-y=g(x+y)$ for $xnot=y$ and certain generalisations.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered Mar 6 at 11:26









Jens SchwaigerJens Schwaiger

1,631138




1,631138











  • $begingroup$
    As it stands this is a link-only answer, and the second article seems to be behind a paywall. Also, both seem to cover a broader class of functions. Including at least a summary of the relevant results seems appropriate.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Mar 6 at 12:05











  • $begingroup$
    This doesn’t solve my problem though.. in that link answer he makes x=-y to prove function h is odd. I can’t do x=-y in my problem, as the denominator cannot be 0.
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    Mar 6 at 13:18










  • $begingroup$
    First you should rewrite the equation by multiplying both sides with $(x+y)(x-y)$. The resulting equation holds true also if $x=y$ or $x=-y$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Schwaiger
    Mar 6 at 17:35










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. That’s true. But in my case the function “h” (the one in the solution by Aczel) is equal to f(x+y)/(x+y) which is not defined for x=-y. So I can’t have an h(0). This is means h is defined on R*. So I can’t prove h is odd.
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    Mar 6 at 18:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @JensSchwaiger you should delete this "answer"
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    As it stands this is a link-only answer, and the second article seems to be behind a paywall. Also, both seem to cover a broader class of functions. Including at least a summary of the relevant results seems appropriate.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Mar 6 at 12:05











  • $begingroup$
    This doesn’t solve my problem though.. in that link answer he makes x=-y to prove function h is odd. I can’t do x=-y in my problem, as the denominator cannot be 0.
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    Mar 6 at 13:18










  • $begingroup$
    First you should rewrite the equation by multiplying both sides with $(x+y)(x-y)$. The resulting equation holds true also if $x=y$ or $x=-y$.
    $endgroup$
    – Jens Schwaiger
    Mar 6 at 17:35










  • $begingroup$
    Yes. That’s true. But in my case the function “h” (the one in the solution by Aczel) is equal to f(x+y)/(x+y) which is not defined for x=-y. So I can’t have an h(0). This is means h is defined on R*. So I can’t prove h is odd.
    $endgroup$
    – furfur
    Mar 6 at 18:20






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @JensSchwaiger you should delete this "answer"
    $endgroup$
    – mathworker21
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
As it stands this is a link-only answer, and the second article seems to be behind a paywall. Also, both seem to cover a broader class of functions. Including at least a summary of the relevant results seems appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Mar 6 at 12:05





$begingroup$
As it stands this is a link-only answer, and the second article seems to be behind a paywall. Also, both seem to cover a broader class of functions. Including at least a summary of the relevant results seems appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Mar 6 at 12:05













$begingroup$
This doesn’t solve my problem though.. in that link answer he makes x=-y to prove function h is odd. I can’t do x=-y in my problem, as the denominator cannot be 0.
$endgroup$
– furfur
Mar 6 at 13:18




$begingroup$
This doesn’t solve my problem though.. in that link answer he makes x=-y to prove function h is odd. I can’t do x=-y in my problem, as the denominator cannot be 0.
$endgroup$
– furfur
Mar 6 at 13:18












$begingroup$
First you should rewrite the equation by multiplying both sides with $(x+y)(x-y)$. The resulting equation holds true also if $x=y$ or $x=-y$.
$endgroup$
– Jens Schwaiger
Mar 6 at 17:35




$begingroup$
First you should rewrite the equation by multiplying both sides with $(x+y)(x-y)$. The resulting equation holds true also if $x=y$ or $x=-y$.
$endgroup$
– Jens Schwaiger
Mar 6 at 17:35












$begingroup$
Yes. That’s true. But in my case the function “h” (the one in the solution by Aczel) is equal to f(x+y)/(x+y) which is not defined for x=-y. So I can’t have an h(0). This is means h is defined on R*. So I can’t prove h is odd.
$endgroup$
– furfur
Mar 6 at 18:20




$begingroup$
Yes. That’s true. But in my case the function “h” (the one in the solution by Aczel) is equal to f(x+y)/(x+y) which is not defined for x=-y. So I can’t have an h(0). This is means h is defined on R*. So I can’t prove h is odd.
$endgroup$
– furfur
Mar 6 at 18:20




2




2




$begingroup$
@JensSchwaiger you should delete this "answer"
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
2 days ago




$begingroup$
@JensSchwaiger you should delete this "answer"
$endgroup$
– mathworker21
2 days ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3137257%2fa-functional-equation-defined-on-the-real-axis%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye