Confused by Hatchers proof of Corollary 2.24Where is the inclusion map being used in the proof of Corollary 2.24 from Hatcher's AT?Expressing $mathbbR$ as the quotient of a disjoint union of unit intervalsSimultaneous CW ApproximationHelp Understanding/Completing Proof of Prop 3.18/3.19 in Hatcher's Algebraic TopologyCW complex is contractible if union of contractible subcomplexes with contractible intersectionGiven a group $G$, the existence of a space such that $pi_1(X)simeq G$.If p is a covering map of a connected space, does p evenly cover the whole space?Mayer-Vietoris sequence from Eilenberg–Steenrod axiomsIdea behind the proof of Whitehead's Theorem and Compression Lemmaunderstanding proof of excision theoremproof of excision theorem: commutativity of a diagram

Why does Captain Marvel assume the people on this planet know this?

Bash script should only kill those instances of another script's that it has launched

Do I really need to have a scientific explanation for my premise?

Was Luke Skywalker the leader of the Rebel forces on Hoth?

Doesn't allowing a user mode program to access kernel space memory and execute the IN and OUT instructions defeat the purpose of having CPU modes?

Of what use is Arcane Recovery to an Elf Wizard?

An alternative proof of an application of Hahn-Banach

'The literal of type int is out of range' con número enteros pequeños (2 dígitos)

How can I ensure my trip to the UK will not have to be cancelled because of Brexit?

Conservation of Mass and Energy

List elements digit difference sort

What are the threaded holes in Manfrotto camera brackets?

Why does liquid water form when we exhale on a mirror?

Reversed Sudoku

Does this video of collapsing warehouse shelves show a real incident?

Can I pump my MTB tire to max (55 psi / 380 kPa) without the tube inside bursting?

Virginia employer terminated employee and wants signing bonus returned

Accountant/ lawyer will not return my call

What are some noteworthy "mic-drop" moments in math?

Accepted offer letter, position changed

Does the nature of the Apocalypse in The Umbrella Academy change from the first to the last episode?

What are actual Tesla M60 models used by AWS?

How to write ı (i without dot) character in pgf-pie

Are tamper resistant receptacles really safer?



Confused by Hatchers proof of Corollary 2.24


Where is the inclusion map being used in the proof of Corollary 2.24 from Hatcher's AT?Expressing $mathbbR$ as the quotient of a disjoint union of unit intervalsSimultaneous CW ApproximationHelp Understanding/Completing Proof of Prop 3.18/3.19 in Hatcher's Algebraic TopologyCW complex is contractible if union of contractible subcomplexes with contractible intersectionGiven a group $G$, the existence of a space such that $pi_1(X)simeq G$.If p is a covering map of a connected space, does p evenly cover the whole space?Mayer-Vietoris sequence from Eilenberg–Steenrod axiomsIdea behind the proof of Whitehead's Theorem and Compression Lemmaunderstanding proof of excision theoremproof of excision theorem: commutativity of a diagram













0












$begingroup$


Corollary 2.24 says: If the CW complex $X$ is the union of subcomplexes $A$ and $B$, then the inclusion $(B,A cap B) rightarrow (X,A)$ induces isomorphisms $H_n(B,A cap B) rightarrow H_n(X,A)$ for all $n$.



Hatcher then gives a very brief proof that I don't comprehend:



Since the $CW$ pairs are good, Proposition 2.22 allows us to pass to the quotient spaces $B/A cap B$ and $X/A$ which are homeomorphic, assuming we are not in the trivial case $A cap B = emptyset$.




Can someone please elaborate on this proof? In particular, why are those two spaces homeomorphic and how exactly do we apply proposition 2.22 here?











share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    Corollary 2.24 says: If the CW complex $X$ is the union of subcomplexes $A$ and $B$, then the inclusion $(B,A cap B) rightarrow (X,A)$ induces isomorphisms $H_n(B,A cap B) rightarrow H_n(X,A)$ for all $n$.



    Hatcher then gives a very brief proof that I don't comprehend:



    Since the $CW$ pairs are good, Proposition 2.22 allows us to pass to the quotient spaces $B/A cap B$ and $X/A$ which are homeomorphic, assuming we are not in the trivial case $A cap B = emptyset$.




    Can someone please elaborate on this proof? In particular, why are those two spaces homeomorphic and how exactly do we apply proposition 2.22 here?











    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Corollary 2.24 says: If the CW complex $X$ is the union of subcomplexes $A$ and $B$, then the inclusion $(B,A cap B) rightarrow (X,A)$ induces isomorphisms $H_n(B,A cap B) rightarrow H_n(X,A)$ for all $n$.



      Hatcher then gives a very brief proof that I don't comprehend:



      Since the $CW$ pairs are good, Proposition 2.22 allows us to pass to the quotient spaces $B/A cap B$ and $X/A$ which are homeomorphic, assuming we are not in the trivial case $A cap B = emptyset$.




      Can someone please elaborate on this proof? In particular, why are those two spaces homeomorphic and how exactly do we apply proposition 2.22 here?











      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Corollary 2.24 says: If the CW complex $X$ is the union of subcomplexes $A$ and $B$, then the inclusion $(B,A cap B) rightarrow (X,A)$ induces isomorphisms $H_n(B,A cap B) rightarrow H_n(X,A)$ for all $n$.



      Hatcher then gives a very brief proof that I don't comprehend:



      Since the $CW$ pairs are good, Proposition 2.22 allows us to pass to the quotient spaces $B/A cap B$ and $X/A$ which are homeomorphic, assuming we are not in the trivial case $A cap B = emptyset$.




      Can someone please elaborate on this proof? In particular, why are those two spaces homeomorphic and how exactly do we apply proposition 2.22 here?








      algebraic-topology






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked May 7 '17 at 18:52









      TuoTuoTuoTuo

      1,781516




      1,781516




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          The inclusion $B to X$ induces a map $B/(A cap B) to X/A$, and its inverse is induced by the map $X to B/(A cap B)$ that is the identity on $B - A$ and that sends $A$ to $A cap B$.



          You may then apply the proposition which states that for a good pair $(X,A)$, $H_n(X,A) = tilde H_n(X/A)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2270361%2fconfused-by-hatchers-proof-of-corollary-2-24%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            The inclusion $B to X$ induces a map $B/(A cap B) to X/A$, and its inverse is induced by the map $X to B/(A cap B)$ that is the identity on $B - A$ and that sends $A$ to $A cap B$.



            You may then apply the proposition which states that for a good pair $(X,A)$, $H_n(X,A) = tilde H_n(X/A)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              The inclusion $B to X$ induces a map $B/(A cap B) to X/A$, and its inverse is induced by the map $X to B/(A cap B)$ that is the identity on $B - A$ and that sends $A$ to $A cap B$.



              You may then apply the proposition which states that for a good pair $(X,A)$, $H_n(X,A) = tilde H_n(X/A)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                The inclusion $B to X$ induces a map $B/(A cap B) to X/A$, and its inverse is induced by the map $X to B/(A cap B)$ that is the identity on $B - A$ and that sends $A$ to $A cap B$.



                You may then apply the proposition which states that for a good pair $(X,A)$, $H_n(X,A) = tilde H_n(X/A)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                The inclusion $B to X$ induces a map $B/(A cap B) to X/A$, and its inverse is induced by the map $X to B/(A cap B)$ that is the identity on $B - A$ and that sends $A$ to $A cap B$.



                You may then apply the proposition which states that for a good pair $(X,A)$, $H_n(X,A) = tilde H_n(X/A)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 2 days ago









                Wolfgang

                4,31943377




                4,31943377










                answered May 7 '17 at 19:00









                Alex ProvostAlex Provost

                15.5k22350




                15.5k22350



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2270361%2fconfused-by-hatchers-proof-of-corollary-2-24%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye