Integral over complex conjugate domainDifferences between Cauchy integral theorem and fundamental theorem for integral calculus over a cycleComputing complex integralSimple complex line integral over a rectangleCauchy integral theorem: Is analyticity enough? Do we need a simply connected domain?Proving a version of Cauchy's theoremComplex Calculus question relating to Moreras theorem.Morera Theorem And Cauchy's Integral TheoremIntegral of a complex function over contourIntegral of a complex function over contour (continued)When would I use Cauchy's Integral Formula over Residue

Hotkey (or other quick way) to insert a keyframe for only one component of a vector-valued property?

Why the color red for the Republican Party

weren't playing vs didn't play

Definition of Statistic

Are tamper resistant receptacles really safer?

An alternative proof of an application of Hahn-Banach

how to copy/paste a formula in Excel absolutely?

How can I ensure my trip to the UK will not have to be cancelled because of Brexit?

Does the nature of the Apocalypse in The Umbrella Academy change from the first to the last episode?

Virginia employer terminated employee and wants signing bonus returned

What are actual Tesla M60 models used by AWS?

How can The Temple of Elementary Evil reliably protect itself against kinetic bombardment?

PTIJ: Should I kill my computer after installing software?

'The literal of type int is out of range' con número enteros pequeños (2 dígitos)

Does this video of collapsing warehouse shelves show a real incident?

Intuition behind counterexample of Euler's sum of powers conjecture

How is the wildcard * interpreted as a command?

Contract Factories

Is it possible to avoid unpacking when merging Association?

What's the "normal" opposite of flautando?

Was Luke Skywalker the leader of the Rebel forces on Hoth?

Do f-stop and exposure time perfectly cancel?

How to draw cubes in a 3 dimensional plane

Are all players supposed to be able to see each others' character sheets?



Integral over complex conjugate domain


Differences between Cauchy integral theorem and fundamental theorem for integral calculus over a cycleComputing complex integralSimple complex line integral over a rectangleCauchy integral theorem: Is analyticity enough? Do we need a simply connected domain?Proving a version of Cauchy's theoremComplex Calculus question relating to Moreras theorem.Morera Theorem And Cauchy's Integral TheoremIntegral of a complex function over contourIntegral of a complex function over contour (continued)When would I use Cauchy's Integral Formula over Residue













0












$begingroup$


So I know that $e^ikz,~zinmathbbC$ is analytic, so without any poles we have



$$int_gamma e^ikzdz=0$$
for any path $gamma$. But what if the integration is taken over the conjugate domain, like
$$int_gamma e^ikzdbarz?$$
Is it simple to come up with a residue theorem for this, or does one have to re-engineer Cauchy's theorem for every specific case?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    0












    $begingroup$


    So I know that $e^ikz,~zinmathbbC$ is analytic, so without any poles we have



    $$int_gamma e^ikzdz=0$$
    for any path $gamma$. But what if the integration is taken over the conjugate domain, like
    $$int_gamma e^ikzdbarz?$$
    Is it simple to come up with a residue theorem for this, or does one have to re-engineer Cauchy's theorem for every specific case?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      So I know that $e^ikz,~zinmathbbC$ is analytic, so without any poles we have



      $$int_gamma e^ikzdz=0$$
      for any path $gamma$. But what if the integration is taken over the conjugate domain, like
      $$int_gamma e^ikzdbarz?$$
      Is it simple to come up with a residue theorem for this, or does one have to re-engineer Cauchy's theorem for every specific case?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      So I know that $e^ikz,~zinmathbbC$ is analytic, so without any poles we have



      $$int_gamma e^ikzdz=0$$
      for any path $gamma$. But what if the integration is taken over the conjugate domain, like
      $$int_gamma e^ikzdbarz?$$
      Is it simple to come up with a residue theorem for this, or does one have to re-engineer Cauchy's theorem for every specific case?







      complex-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Feb 8 at 21:17









      levitopherlevitopher

      1,1161226




      1,1161226




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Applying the conjugate there is essentially equivalent to applying it to the function; if $I(gamma) = int_gammaf(z),doverlinez$, then $overlineI(gamma) = int_gammaoverlinef(z),dz$.



          And the problem with that? It's strongly path-dependent. Unlike holomorphic functions, conjugate-holomorphic functions aren't exact forms. Let $f(x+iy)=g(x,y)+ih(x,y)$ and parametrize the closed loop $gamma$ enclosing a region $R$ by $Z(t)=X(t)+iY(t)$ for $t$ from $a$ to $b$. We get
          beginalign*I(gamma) &= int_a^b left(g(X(t),Y(t))+ih(X(t),Y(t)right)cdot (X'(t)-iY'(t)),dt\
          &= int_a^b g(X,Y)X'(t) + h(X,Y)Y'(t) + ih(X,Y)X'(t)-ig(X,Y)Y'(t),dt\
          &= int_gamma(g+ih)(X,Y),dx + (h-ig)(X,Y),dy\
          I(gamma) &= iint_R fracpartial (h-ig)partial x - fracpartial (g+ih)partial y,dx,dy\
          &= iint_R -if'(x+iy) - if'(x+iy),dx,dyendalign*

          (We abbreviate $g(X(t),Y(t))$ by $g(X,Y)$. These are all real double integrals and line integrals, although we allow complex-valued functions to simplify things a bit. The step from a line integral to an area integral was an application of Green's theorem.)



          So then, the integral $int_gamma f(z),doverlinez$ is the area integral of $-2if'$ over the region enclosed. It's not something that we can focus on a few points to handle - we have to deal with the whole region. And that's for a function that doesn't have any singularities in there.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3105612%2fintegral-over-complex-conjugate-domain%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            Applying the conjugate there is essentially equivalent to applying it to the function; if $I(gamma) = int_gammaf(z),doverlinez$, then $overlineI(gamma) = int_gammaoverlinef(z),dz$.



            And the problem with that? It's strongly path-dependent. Unlike holomorphic functions, conjugate-holomorphic functions aren't exact forms. Let $f(x+iy)=g(x,y)+ih(x,y)$ and parametrize the closed loop $gamma$ enclosing a region $R$ by $Z(t)=X(t)+iY(t)$ for $t$ from $a$ to $b$. We get
            beginalign*I(gamma) &= int_a^b left(g(X(t),Y(t))+ih(X(t),Y(t)right)cdot (X'(t)-iY'(t)),dt\
            &= int_a^b g(X,Y)X'(t) + h(X,Y)Y'(t) + ih(X,Y)X'(t)-ig(X,Y)Y'(t),dt\
            &= int_gamma(g+ih)(X,Y),dx + (h-ig)(X,Y),dy\
            I(gamma) &= iint_R fracpartial (h-ig)partial x - fracpartial (g+ih)partial y,dx,dy\
            &= iint_R -if'(x+iy) - if'(x+iy),dx,dyendalign*

            (We abbreviate $g(X(t),Y(t))$ by $g(X,Y)$. These are all real double integrals and line integrals, although we allow complex-valued functions to simplify things a bit. The step from a line integral to an area integral was an application of Green's theorem.)



            So then, the integral $int_gamma f(z),doverlinez$ is the area integral of $-2if'$ over the region enclosed. It's not something that we can focus on a few points to handle - we have to deal with the whole region. And that's for a function that doesn't have any singularities in there.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              Applying the conjugate there is essentially equivalent to applying it to the function; if $I(gamma) = int_gammaf(z),doverlinez$, then $overlineI(gamma) = int_gammaoverlinef(z),dz$.



              And the problem with that? It's strongly path-dependent. Unlike holomorphic functions, conjugate-holomorphic functions aren't exact forms. Let $f(x+iy)=g(x,y)+ih(x,y)$ and parametrize the closed loop $gamma$ enclosing a region $R$ by $Z(t)=X(t)+iY(t)$ for $t$ from $a$ to $b$. We get
              beginalign*I(gamma) &= int_a^b left(g(X(t),Y(t))+ih(X(t),Y(t)right)cdot (X'(t)-iY'(t)),dt\
              &= int_a^b g(X,Y)X'(t) + h(X,Y)Y'(t) + ih(X,Y)X'(t)-ig(X,Y)Y'(t),dt\
              &= int_gamma(g+ih)(X,Y),dx + (h-ig)(X,Y),dy\
              I(gamma) &= iint_R fracpartial (h-ig)partial x - fracpartial (g+ih)partial y,dx,dy\
              &= iint_R -if'(x+iy) - if'(x+iy),dx,dyendalign*

              (We abbreviate $g(X(t),Y(t))$ by $g(X,Y)$. These are all real double integrals and line integrals, although we allow complex-valued functions to simplify things a bit. The step from a line integral to an area integral was an application of Green's theorem.)



              So then, the integral $int_gamma f(z),doverlinez$ is the area integral of $-2if'$ over the region enclosed. It's not something that we can focus on a few points to handle - we have to deal with the whole region. And that's for a function that doesn't have any singularities in there.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Applying the conjugate there is essentially equivalent to applying it to the function; if $I(gamma) = int_gammaf(z),doverlinez$, then $overlineI(gamma) = int_gammaoverlinef(z),dz$.



                And the problem with that? It's strongly path-dependent. Unlike holomorphic functions, conjugate-holomorphic functions aren't exact forms. Let $f(x+iy)=g(x,y)+ih(x,y)$ and parametrize the closed loop $gamma$ enclosing a region $R$ by $Z(t)=X(t)+iY(t)$ for $t$ from $a$ to $b$. We get
                beginalign*I(gamma) &= int_a^b left(g(X(t),Y(t))+ih(X(t),Y(t)right)cdot (X'(t)-iY'(t)),dt\
                &= int_a^b g(X,Y)X'(t) + h(X,Y)Y'(t) + ih(X,Y)X'(t)-ig(X,Y)Y'(t),dt\
                &= int_gamma(g+ih)(X,Y),dx + (h-ig)(X,Y),dy\
                I(gamma) &= iint_R fracpartial (h-ig)partial x - fracpartial (g+ih)partial y,dx,dy\
                &= iint_R -if'(x+iy) - if'(x+iy),dx,dyendalign*

                (We abbreviate $g(X(t),Y(t))$ by $g(X,Y)$. These are all real double integrals and line integrals, although we allow complex-valued functions to simplify things a bit. The step from a line integral to an area integral was an application of Green's theorem.)



                So then, the integral $int_gamma f(z),doverlinez$ is the area integral of $-2if'$ over the region enclosed. It's not something that we can focus on a few points to handle - we have to deal with the whole region. And that's for a function that doesn't have any singularities in there.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Applying the conjugate there is essentially equivalent to applying it to the function; if $I(gamma) = int_gammaf(z),doverlinez$, then $overlineI(gamma) = int_gammaoverlinef(z),dz$.



                And the problem with that? It's strongly path-dependent. Unlike holomorphic functions, conjugate-holomorphic functions aren't exact forms. Let $f(x+iy)=g(x,y)+ih(x,y)$ and parametrize the closed loop $gamma$ enclosing a region $R$ by $Z(t)=X(t)+iY(t)$ for $t$ from $a$ to $b$. We get
                beginalign*I(gamma) &= int_a^b left(g(X(t),Y(t))+ih(X(t),Y(t)right)cdot (X'(t)-iY'(t)),dt\
                &= int_a^b g(X,Y)X'(t) + h(X,Y)Y'(t) + ih(X,Y)X'(t)-ig(X,Y)Y'(t),dt\
                &= int_gamma(g+ih)(X,Y),dx + (h-ig)(X,Y),dy\
                I(gamma) &= iint_R fracpartial (h-ig)partial x - fracpartial (g+ih)partial y,dx,dy\
                &= iint_R -if'(x+iy) - if'(x+iy),dx,dyendalign*

                (We abbreviate $g(X(t),Y(t))$ by $g(X,Y)$. These are all real double integrals and line integrals, although we allow complex-valued functions to simplify things a bit. The step from a line integral to an area integral was an application of Green's theorem.)



                So then, the integral $int_gamma f(z),doverlinez$ is the area integral of $-2if'$ over the region enclosed. It's not something that we can focus on a few points to handle - we have to deal with the whole region. And that's for a function that doesn't have any singularities in there.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 2 days ago

























                answered Feb 8 at 21:53









                jmerryjmerry

                13.4k1628




                13.4k1628



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3105612%2fintegral-over-complex-conjugate-domain%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

                    John Burke, 9th Earl of Clanricarde References Navigation menuA General and heraldic dictionary of the peerage and baronetage of the British EmpireLeigh Rayment's Peerage Pages

                    Football at the 1986 Brunei Merdeka Games Contents Teams Group stage Knockout stage References Navigation menu"Brunei Merdeka Games 1986".