Sufficient conditions for the Hardy-Littlewood Maximal function $M(f)$ being continuousHardy-Littlewood maximal function weak type estimateNorm of Hardy-Littlewood maximal operatorexample of maximal operator that is integrableA basic question regarding Lebesgue's density theoremHow to compare the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function for balls and cubes?A stronger form of the weak $(1,1)$ inequality for the Hardy-Littlewood maximal functionHardy-Littlewood maximal function for Dirac measure on the torusSome questions on the Hardy Littlewood Maximal FunctionHardy Littlewood maximal function $|h(x)|<|h^*(x)|$ for almost every xWhy does the lower bound on the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function make it non-integrable?

Examples of a statistic that is not independent of sample's distribution?

Distinction between apt-cache and dpkg -l

Virginia employer terminated employee and wants signing bonus returned

Are babies of evil humanoid species inherently evil?

Was Luke Skywalker the leader of the Rebel forces on Hoth?

How many characters using PHB rules does it take to be able to have access to any PHB spell at the start of an adventuring day?

How to write ı (i without dot) character in pgf-pie

Why does liquid water form when we exhale on a mirror?

How can I get players to stop ignoring or overlooking the plot hooks I'm giving them?

When traveling to Europe from North America, do I need to purchase a different power strip?

'The literal of type int is out of range' con número enteros pequeños (2 dígitos)

How to draw cubes in a 3 dimensional plane

Is "history" a male-biased word ("his+story")?

How can The Temple of Elementary Evil reliably protect itself against kinetic bombardment?

Motivation for Zeta Function of an Algebraic Variety

Find longest word in a string: are any of these algorithms good?

Good for you! in Russian

What Happens when Passenger Refuses to Fly Boeing 737 Max?

Does this video of collapsing warehouse shelves show a real incident?

What are some noteworthy "mic-drop" moments in math?

Error during using callback start_page_number in lualatex

Are tamper resistant receptacles really safer?

Shifting between bemols (flats) and diesis (sharps)in the key signature

Why would one plane in this picture not have gear down yet?



Sufficient conditions for the Hardy-Littlewood Maximal function $M(f)$ being continuous


Hardy-Littlewood maximal function weak type estimateNorm of Hardy-Littlewood maximal operatorexample of maximal operator that is integrableA basic question regarding Lebesgue's density theoremHow to compare the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function for balls and cubes?A stronger form of the weak $(1,1)$ inequality for the Hardy-Littlewood maximal functionHardy-Littlewood maximal function for Dirac measure on the torusSome questions on the Hardy Littlewood Maximal FunctionHardy Littlewood maximal function $|h(x)|<|h^*(x)|$ for almost every xWhy does the lower bound on the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function make it non-integrable?













6












$begingroup$


There are four common versions of Hardy-Littlewood Maximal operator $M(f)$: centered/uncentered + ball/cube.
I noticed that the continuity of $M(f)$ depends on the version. For example, let $f$ be the characteristic function of the interval $[0,1]$. Then the centered version of $M(f)$ is not continuous while the uncentered version is continuous. (ball and cube are the same in 1-dim). My question is: for each version of $M(f)$, under what conditions for $f$ is $M(f)$ continuous?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    6












    $begingroup$


    There are four common versions of Hardy-Littlewood Maximal operator $M(f)$: centered/uncentered + ball/cube.
    I noticed that the continuity of $M(f)$ depends on the version. For example, let $f$ be the characteristic function of the interval $[0,1]$. Then the centered version of $M(f)$ is not continuous while the uncentered version is continuous. (ball and cube are the same in 1-dim). My question is: for each version of $M(f)$, under what conditions for $f$ is $M(f)$ continuous?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      6












      6








      6


      2



      $begingroup$


      There are four common versions of Hardy-Littlewood Maximal operator $M(f)$: centered/uncentered + ball/cube.
      I noticed that the continuity of $M(f)$ depends on the version. For example, let $f$ be the characteristic function of the interval $[0,1]$. Then the centered version of $M(f)$ is not continuous while the uncentered version is continuous. (ball and cube are the same in 1-dim). My question is: for each version of $M(f)$, under what conditions for $f$ is $M(f)$ continuous?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      There are four common versions of Hardy-Littlewood Maximal operator $M(f)$: centered/uncentered + ball/cube.
      I noticed that the continuity of $M(f)$ depends on the version. For example, let $f$ be the characteristic function of the interval $[0,1]$. Then the centered version of $M(f)$ is not continuous while the uncentered version is continuous. (ball and cube are the same in 1-dim). My question is: for each version of $M(f)$, under what conditions for $f$ is $M(f)$ continuous?







      optimization lebesgue-integral lebesgue-measure






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Aug 11 '15 at 2:10









      Moya

      3,9761926




      3,9761926










      asked Aug 10 '15 at 23:57









      ZTDZTD

      1639




      1639




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Here is a partial answer:



          Let $Mf(x)=sup_r>0frac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy$ be the (centered) Hardy Littlewood Maximal Function.




          Proposition: Let $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$. Then $Mf$ is lower semicontinuous, and in particular, measurable.




          Proof: Lower semicontinuity means $E(t)=x: Mf(x)>t$ is open for all $tin mathbbR$. Let $xin E(t)$. Then $Mf(x)>t$, so there is an $r>0$ such that $Mf(x)geqfrac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$. If we choose $s>r$ small enough, then $$Mf(x)geqfrac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>frac1lambda(B(x,s))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$$Then, for $z$ such that $|z-x|+r<s$, we will have $B(x,r)subset B(z,s)$, so $$Mf(z)geqfrac1lambda(B(z,s))int_B(z,r)|f(y)|dy>frac1lambda(B(x,s))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$$ Thus $zin E(t)$, and the set of $z$ is open, so $E(t)$ is open.



          Note: This is much easier to prove for the uncentered Hardy Littlewood Function.



          Now, we are reduced to showing when $Mf$ is upper semicontinuous, since if a function is lower and upper semicontinuous somewhere, it is continuous. Searching hasn't gotten me much in terms of if and only if, but there is this result:




          Proposition: If $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$ is continuous at some point $x$, then $Mf$ is also continuous at $x$.




          The proof is found in this article: Lemma 7.3. A slightly different requirement is the following:




          Proposition: If $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$ is upper semicontinuous at $x$ and $f(x)leq Mf(x)$, then $Mf$ is continuous at $x$.




          The proof is in this paper (Lemma 3.4). Although $chi_[0,1]$ is upper semicontinuous everywhere, $Mchi_[0,1]$ is not continuous at $0$ or $1$. The theorem holds because $$chi_[0,1](0)=1>Mchi_[0,1](0)=frac12$$This provides a counterexample showing that we need the second condition.



          Hope this helps as a partial answer!






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            In the uncentered case, if $Qni x$ is any cube (which we can assume open) such that $1/|Q|int_Q |f(y)|dy>a$ then every point inside $Q$ will have $f^ast(y)>a$, and hence $Q$ is a nbhd of $x$ contained in $f^ast>a$.
            $endgroup$
            – Pedro Tamaroff
            Nov 5 '15 at 3:13


















          0












          $begingroup$

          In Folland's Real Analysis : Modern Techniques and Their Applications, it is proved that $A_rf(x)$ is jointly continuous in $r$ and $x$. Hence, because the preimage of any open set is open under $A_rf$ and that you can write $Hf^-1(a,infty)=cup_r>0 (A_r|f|)^-1(a,infty)$, you have that $Hf$ is lower semicontinuous. Same applies to prove upper semicontinuity.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1392563%2fsufficient-conditions-for-the-hardy-littlewood-maximal-function-mf-being-con%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            Here is a partial answer:



            Let $Mf(x)=sup_r>0frac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy$ be the (centered) Hardy Littlewood Maximal Function.




            Proposition: Let $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$. Then $Mf$ is lower semicontinuous, and in particular, measurable.




            Proof: Lower semicontinuity means $E(t)=x: Mf(x)>t$ is open for all $tin mathbbR$. Let $xin E(t)$. Then $Mf(x)>t$, so there is an $r>0$ such that $Mf(x)geqfrac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$. If we choose $s>r$ small enough, then $$Mf(x)geqfrac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>frac1lambda(B(x,s))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$$Then, for $z$ such that $|z-x|+r<s$, we will have $B(x,r)subset B(z,s)$, so $$Mf(z)geqfrac1lambda(B(z,s))int_B(z,r)|f(y)|dy>frac1lambda(B(x,s))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$$ Thus $zin E(t)$, and the set of $z$ is open, so $E(t)$ is open.



            Note: This is much easier to prove for the uncentered Hardy Littlewood Function.



            Now, we are reduced to showing when $Mf$ is upper semicontinuous, since if a function is lower and upper semicontinuous somewhere, it is continuous. Searching hasn't gotten me much in terms of if and only if, but there is this result:




            Proposition: If $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$ is continuous at some point $x$, then $Mf$ is also continuous at $x$.




            The proof is found in this article: Lemma 7.3. A slightly different requirement is the following:




            Proposition: If $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$ is upper semicontinuous at $x$ and $f(x)leq Mf(x)$, then $Mf$ is continuous at $x$.




            The proof is in this paper (Lemma 3.4). Although $chi_[0,1]$ is upper semicontinuous everywhere, $Mchi_[0,1]$ is not continuous at $0$ or $1$. The theorem holds because $$chi_[0,1](0)=1>Mchi_[0,1](0)=frac12$$This provides a counterexample showing that we need the second condition.



            Hope this helps as a partial answer!






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              In the uncentered case, if $Qni x$ is any cube (which we can assume open) such that $1/|Q|int_Q |f(y)|dy>a$ then every point inside $Q$ will have $f^ast(y)>a$, and hence $Q$ is a nbhd of $x$ contained in $f^ast>a$.
              $endgroup$
              – Pedro Tamaroff
              Nov 5 '15 at 3:13















            4












            $begingroup$

            Here is a partial answer:



            Let $Mf(x)=sup_r>0frac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy$ be the (centered) Hardy Littlewood Maximal Function.




            Proposition: Let $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$. Then $Mf$ is lower semicontinuous, and in particular, measurable.




            Proof: Lower semicontinuity means $E(t)=x: Mf(x)>t$ is open for all $tin mathbbR$. Let $xin E(t)$. Then $Mf(x)>t$, so there is an $r>0$ such that $Mf(x)geqfrac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$. If we choose $s>r$ small enough, then $$Mf(x)geqfrac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>frac1lambda(B(x,s))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$$Then, for $z$ such that $|z-x|+r<s$, we will have $B(x,r)subset B(z,s)$, so $$Mf(z)geqfrac1lambda(B(z,s))int_B(z,r)|f(y)|dy>frac1lambda(B(x,s))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$$ Thus $zin E(t)$, and the set of $z$ is open, so $E(t)$ is open.



            Note: This is much easier to prove for the uncentered Hardy Littlewood Function.



            Now, we are reduced to showing when $Mf$ is upper semicontinuous, since if a function is lower and upper semicontinuous somewhere, it is continuous. Searching hasn't gotten me much in terms of if and only if, but there is this result:




            Proposition: If $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$ is continuous at some point $x$, then $Mf$ is also continuous at $x$.




            The proof is found in this article: Lemma 7.3. A slightly different requirement is the following:




            Proposition: If $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$ is upper semicontinuous at $x$ and $f(x)leq Mf(x)$, then $Mf$ is continuous at $x$.




            The proof is in this paper (Lemma 3.4). Although $chi_[0,1]$ is upper semicontinuous everywhere, $Mchi_[0,1]$ is not continuous at $0$ or $1$. The theorem holds because $$chi_[0,1](0)=1>Mchi_[0,1](0)=frac12$$This provides a counterexample showing that we need the second condition.



            Hope this helps as a partial answer!






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              In the uncentered case, if $Qni x$ is any cube (which we can assume open) such that $1/|Q|int_Q |f(y)|dy>a$ then every point inside $Q$ will have $f^ast(y)>a$, and hence $Q$ is a nbhd of $x$ contained in $f^ast>a$.
              $endgroup$
              – Pedro Tamaroff
              Nov 5 '15 at 3:13













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Here is a partial answer:



            Let $Mf(x)=sup_r>0frac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy$ be the (centered) Hardy Littlewood Maximal Function.




            Proposition: Let $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$. Then $Mf$ is lower semicontinuous, and in particular, measurable.




            Proof: Lower semicontinuity means $E(t)=x: Mf(x)>t$ is open for all $tin mathbbR$. Let $xin E(t)$. Then $Mf(x)>t$, so there is an $r>0$ such that $Mf(x)geqfrac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$. If we choose $s>r$ small enough, then $$Mf(x)geqfrac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>frac1lambda(B(x,s))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$$Then, for $z$ such that $|z-x|+r<s$, we will have $B(x,r)subset B(z,s)$, so $$Mf(z)geqfrac1lambda(B(z,s))int_B(z,r)|f(y)|dy>frac1lambda(B(x,s))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$$ Thus $zin E(t)$, and the set of $z$ is open, so $E(t)$ is open.



            Note: This is much easier to prove for the uncentered Hardy Littlewood Function.



            Now, we are reduced to showing when $Mf$ is upper semicontinuous, since if a function is lower and upper semicontinuous somewhere, it is continuous. Searching hasn't gotten me much in terms of if and only if, but there is this result:




            Proposition: If $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$ is continuous at some point $x$, then $Mf$ is also continuous at $x$.




            The proof is found in this article: Lemma 7.3. A slightly different requirement is the following:




            Proposition: If $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$ is upper semicontinuous at $x$ and $f(x)leq Mf(x)$, then $Mf$ is continuous at $x$.




            The proof is in this paper (Lemma 3.4). Although $chi_[0,1]$ is upper semicontinuous everywhere, $Mchi_[0,1]$ is not continuous at $0$ or $1$. The theorem holds because $$chi_[0,1](0)=1>Mchi_[0,1](0)=frac12$$This provides a counterexample showing that we need the second condition.



            Hope this helps as a partial answer!






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Here is a partial answer:



            Let $Mf(x)=sup_r>0frac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy$ be the (centered) Hardy Littlewood Maximal Function.




            Proposition: Let $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$. Then $Mf$ is lower semicontinuous, and in particular, measurable.




            Proof: Lower semicontinuity means $E(t)=x: Mf(x)>t$ is open for all $tin mathbbR$. Let $xin E(t)$. Then $Mf(x)>t$, so there is an $r>0$ such that $Mf(x)geqfrac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$. If we choose $s>r$ small enough, then $$Mf(x)geqfrac1lambda(B(x,r))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>frac1lambda(B(x,s))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$$Then, for $z$ such that $|z-x|+r<s$, we will have $B(x,r)subset B(z,s)$, so $$Mf(z)geqfrac1lambda(B(z,s))int_B(z,r)|f(y)|dy>frac1lambda(B(x,s))int_B(x,r)|f(y)|dy>t$$ Thus $zin E(t)$, and the set of $z$ is open, so $E(t)$ is open.



            Note: This is much easier to prove for the uncentered Hardy Littlewood Function.



            Now, we are reduced to showing when $Mf$ is upper semicontinuous, since if a function is lower and upper semicontinuous somewhere, it is continuous. Searching hasn't gotten me much in terms of if and only if, but there is this result:




            Proposition: If $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$ is continuous at some point $x$, then $Mf$ is also continuous at $x$.




            The proof is found in this article: Lemma 7.3. A slightly different requirement is the following:




            Proposition: If $fin L^1_loc(mathbbR^n)$ is upper semicontinuous at $x$ and $f(x)leq Mf(x)$, then $Mf$ is continuous at $x$.




            The proof is in this paper (Lemma 3.4). Although $chi_[0,1]$ is upper semicontinuous everywhere, $Mchi_[0,1]$ is not continuous at $0$ or $1$. The theorem holds because $$chi_[0,1](0)=1>Mchi_[0,1](0)=frac12$$This provides a counterexample showing that we need the second condition.



            Hope this helps as a partial answer!







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 1 '17 at 10:58

























            answered Aug 11 '15 at 2:07









            MoyaMoya

            3,9761926




            3,9761926











            • $begingroup$
              In the uncentered case, if $Qni x$ is any cube (which we can assume open) such that $1/|Q|int_Q |f(y)|dy>a$ then every point inside $Q$ will have $f^ast(y)>a$, and hence $Q$ is a nbhd of $x$ contained in $f^ast>a$.
              $endgroup$
              – Pedro Tamaroff
              Nov 5 '15 at 3:13
















            • $begingroup$
              In the uncentered case, if $Qni x$ is any cube (which we can assume open) such that $1/|Q|int_Q |f(y)|dy>a$ then every point inside $Q$ will have $f^ast(y)>a$, and hence $Q$ is a nbhd of $x$ contained in $f^ast>a$.
              $endgroup$
              – Pedro Tamaroff
              Nov 5 '15 at 3:13















            $begingroup$
            In the uncentered case, if $Qni x$ is any cube (which we can assume open) such that $1/|Q|int_Q |f(y)|dy>a$ then every point inside $Q$ will have $f^ast(y)>a$, and hence $Q$ is a nbhd of $x$ contained in $f^ast>a$.
            $endgroup$
            – Pedro Tamaroff
            Nov 5 '15 at 3:13




            $begingroup$
            In the uncentered case, if $Qni x$ is any cube (which we can assume open) such that $1/|Q|int_Q |f(y)|dy>a$ then every point inside $Q$ will have $f^ast(y)>a$, and hence $Q$ is a nbhd of $x$ contained in $f^ast>a$.
            $endgroup$
            – Pedro Tamaroff
            Nov 5 '15 at 3:13











            0












            $begingroup$

            In Folland's Real Analysis : Modern Techniques and Their Applications, it is proved that $A_rf(x)$ is jointly continuous in $r$ and $x$. Hence, because the preimage of any open set is open under $A_rf$ and that you can write $Hf^-1(a,infty)=cup_r>0 (A_r|f|)^-1(a,infty)$, you have that $Hf$ is lower semicontinuous. Same applies to prove upper semicontinuity.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              In Folland's Real Analysis : Modern Techniques and Their Applications, it is proved that $A_rf(x)$ is jointly continuous in $r$ and $x$. Hence, because the preimage of any open set is open under $A_rf$ and that you can write $Hf^-1(a,infty)=cup_r>0 (A_r|f|)^-1(a,infty)$, you have that $Hf$ is lower semicontinuous. Same applies to prove upper semicontinuity.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                In Folland's Real Analysis : Modern Techniques and Their Applications, it is proved that $A_rf(x)$ is jointly continuous in $r$ and $x$. Hence, because the preimage of any open set is open under $A_rf$ and that you can write $Hf^-1(a,infty)=cup_r>0 (A_r|f|)^-1(a,infty)$, you have that $Hf$ is lower semicontinuous. Same applies to prove upper semicontinuity.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                In Folland's Real Analysis : Modern Techniques and Their Applications, it is proved that $A_rf(x)$ is jointly continuous in $r$ and $x$. Hence, because the preimage of any open set is open under $A_rf$ and that you can write $Hf^-1(a,infty)=cup_r>0 (A_r|f|)^-1(a,infty)$, you have that $Hf$ is lower semicontinuous. Same applies to prove upper semicontinuity.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 2 days ago

























                answered 2 days ago









                MalikMalik

                24510




                24510



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1392563%2fsufficient-conditions-for-the-hardy-littlewood-maximal-function-mf-being-con%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer