Correct Formulation of a map between two measurable spacesMeasurable functions with values in Banach spacesOn integration, measurability, almost everywhere conceptComposition of 2 Lebesgue measurable functions is not lebesgue measurable: Are these two functions Borel Measurable?Shorter proof of measurability of the set where two measurable functions differCounterexample on product of measurable spacesMeasurability of function on incomplete measurable spaces.universal property of measurable spacesFolland Real Analysis Exercise 1.2.3Trouble understanding the proof of disintegration of measure by TaoContinuous map between $L^p$ spaces
Is it necessary to separate DC power cables and data cables?
Shifting between bemols (flats) and diesis (sharps)in the key signature
Find longest word in a string: are any of these algorithms good?
Are all players supposed to be able to see each others' character sheets?
Virginia employer terminated employee and wants signing bonus returned
Accountant/ lawyer will not return my call
Bash script should only kill those instances of another script's that it has launched
Filtering SOQL results with optional conditionals
Reverse string, can I make it faster?
Intuition behind counterexample of Euler's sum of powers conjecture
Why does the negative sign arise in this thermodynamic relation?
Could you please stop shuffling the deck and play already?
How can The Temple of Elementary Evil reliably protect itself against kinetic bombardment?
How to secure an aircraft at a transient parking space?
Single word request: Harming the benefactor
Recommendation letter by significant other if you worked with them professionally?
How do I express some one as a black person?
Database Backup for data and log files
Can I pump my MTB tire to max (55 psi / 380 kPa) without the tube inside bursting?
Are tamper resistant receptacles really safer?
Motivation for Zeta Function of an Algebraic Variety
How is the wildcard * interpreted as a command?
How to write ı (i without dot) character in pgf-pie
Accepted offer letter, position changed
Correct Formulation of a map between two measurable spaces
Measurable functions with values in Banach spacesOn integration, measurability, almost everywhere conceptComposition of 2 Lebesgue measurable functions is not lebesgue measurable: Are these two functions Borel Measurable?Shorter proof of measurability of the set where two measurable functions differCounterexample on product of measurable spacesMeasurability of function on incomplete measurable spaces.universal property of measurable spacesFolland Real Analysis Exercise 1.2.3Trouble understanding the proof of disintegration of measure by TaoContinuous map between $L^p$ spaces
$begingroup$
Let $pi: (X,mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ be a measurable map i.e. $pi^-1(E) in mathcalM$ for all $E in mathcalN$. I want to define a map from $L^infty(Y,eta)$ to $L^infty(X,nu)$. The natural thing to do is the following:
Define a map $tildepi:L^infty(Y,eta) to L^infty(X,nu)$ by $$tildepi(f)=fcircpi,f in L^infty(Y,eta)$$
Recall that
$$|f|_infty=infleft{alpha ge 0: muleft(f(x)$$
Claim-1: $tildepi(f)$ is measurable.
Proof: Let's assume that $tildepi(f)$ is real-valued, without any loss of generality. Observe that $tildepi(f)^-1([a,infty))=pi^-1left(f^-1([a,infty)right)$. Since $f$ is a measurable, $f^-1([a,infty)) in mathcalN$. Since $pi$ is a measurable map, $$tildepi(f)^-1left([a,infty)right)=pi^-1left(f^-1([a,infty))right) in mathcalM$$
Claim-2: $tildepi(f) in L^infty(X,nu)$
Proof: Observe that for a.e $x in X$ , we have $|f(pi(x))| le |f|_infty < infty$.
At this point of time, I need one assumption that $pi_*(nu)=eta$. I don't see how else to move forward without this assumption.
Let $E_alpha=f(pi(x))$. Let $F_alpha=f(y)$. Then, $E_alphasubseteqpi^-1left(F_alpharight)$. For $alpha > |f|_infty$, observe that $eta(F_alpha)=0$. Since $pi^-1(F_alpha) in mathcalN$, we have that $nu(pi^-1(F_alpha))=0$ and hence $nu(E_alpha)=0$. Thus, $|tildepi(f)|_infty le |f|_infty< infty$.
Please let me know if there is something wrong with this proof. Thanks for the help!!
analysis measure-theory lp-spaces measurable-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $pi: (X,mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ be a measurable map i.e. $pi^-1(E) in mathcalM$ for all $E in mathcalN$. I want to define a map from $L^infty(Y,eta)$ to $L^infty(X,nu)$. The natural thing to do is the following:
Define a map $tildepi:L^infty(Y,eta) to L^infty(X,nu)$ by $$tildepi(f)=fcircpi,f in L^infty(Y,eta)$$
Recall that
$$|f|_infty=infleft{alpha ge 0: muleft(f(x)$$
Claim-1: $tildepi(f)$ is measurable.
Proof: Let's assume that $tildepi(f)$ is real-valued, without any loss of generality. Observe that $tildepi(f)^-1([a,infty))=pi^-1left(f^-1([a,infty)right)$. Since $f$ is a measurable, $f^-1([a,infty)) in mathcalN$. Since $pi$ is a measurable map, $$tildepi(f)^-1left([a,infty)right)=pi^-1left(f^-1([a,infty))right) in mathcalM$$
Claim-2: $tildepi(f) in L^infty(X,nu)$
Proof: Observe that for a.e $x in X$ , we have $|f(pi(x))| le |f|_infty < infty$.
At this point of time, I need one assumption that $pi_*(nu)=eta$. I don't see how else to move forward without this assumption.
Let $E_alpha=f(pi(x))$. Let $F_alpha=f(y)$. Then, $E_alphasubseteqpi^-1left(F_alpharight)$. For $alpha > |f|_infty$, observe that $eta(F_alpha)=0$. Since $pi^-1(F_alpha) in mathcalN$, we have that $nu(pi^-1(F_alpha))=0$ and hence $nu(E_alpha)=0$. Thus, $|tildepi(f)|_infty le |f|_infty< infty$.
Please let me know if there is something wrong with this proof. Thanks for the help!!
analysis measure-theory lp-spaces measurable-functions
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $pi: (X,mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ be a measurable map i.e. $pi^-1(E) in mathcalM$ for all $E in mathcalN$. I want to define a map from $L^infty(Y,eta)$ to $L^infty(X,nu)$. The natural thing to do is the following:
Define a map $tildepi:L^infty(Y,eta) to L^infty(X,nu)$ by $$tildepi(f)=fcircpi,f in L^infty(Y,eta)$$
Recall that
$$|f|_infty=infleft{alpha ge 0: muleft(f(x)$$
Claim-1: $tildepi(f)$ is measurable.
Proof: Let's assume that $tildepi(f)$ is real-valued, without any loss of generality. Observe that $tildepi(f)^-1([a,infty))=pi^-1left(f^-1([a,infty)right)$. Since $f$ is a measurable, $f^-1([a,infty)) in mathcalN$. Since $pi$ is a measurable map, $$tildepi(f)^-1left([a,infty)right)=pi^-1left(f^-1([a,infty))right) in mathcalM$$
Claim-2: $tildepi(f) in L^infty(X,nu)$
Proof: Observe that for a.e $x in X$ , we have $|f(pi(x))| le |f|_infty < infty$.
At this point of time, I need one assumption that $pi_*(nu)=eta$. I don't see how else to move forward without this assumption.
Let $E_alpha=f(pi(x))$. Let $F_alpha=f(y)$. Then, $E_alphasubseteqpi^-1left(F_alpharight)$. For $alpha > |f|_infty$, observe that $eta(F_alpha)=0$. Since $pi^-1(F_alpha) in mathcalN$, we have that $nu(pi^-1(F_alpha))=0$ and hence $nu(E_alpha)=0$. Thus, $|tildepi(f)|_infty le |f|_infty< infty$.
Please let me know if there is something wrong with this proof. Thanks for the help!!
analysis measure-theory lp-spaces measurable-functions
$endgroup$
Let $pi: (X,mathcalM,nu) to (Y,mathcalN,eta)$ be a measurable map i.e. $pi^-1(E) in mathcalM$ for all $E in mathcalN$. I want to define a map from $L^infty(Y,eta)$ to $L^infty(X,nu)$. The natural thing to do is the following:
Define a map $tildepi:L^infty(Y,eta) to L^infty(X,nu)$ by $$tildepi(f)=fcircpi,f in L^infty(Y,eta)$$
Recall that
$$|f|_infty=infleft{alpha ge 0: muleft(f(x)$$
Claim-1: $tildepi(f)$ is measurable.
Proof: Let's assume that $tildepi(f)$ is real-valued, without any loss of generality. Observe that $tildepi(f)^-1([a,infty))=pi^-1left(f^-1([a,infty)right)$. Since $f$ is a measurable, $f^-1([a,infty)) in mathcalN$. Since $pi$ is a measurable map, $$tildepi(f)^-1left([a,infty)right)=pi^-1left(f^-1([a,infty))right) in mathcalM$$
Claim-2: $tildepi(f) in L^infty(X,nu)$
Proof: Observe that for a.e $x in X$ , we have $|f(pi(x))| le |f|_infty < infty$.
At this point of time, I need one assumption that $pi_*(nu)=eta$. I don't see how else to move forward without this assumption.
Let $E_alpha=f(pi(x))$. Let $F_alpha=f(y)$. Then, $E_alphasubseteqpi^-1left(F_alpharight)$. For $alpha > |f|_infty$, observe that $eta(F_alpha)=0$. Since $pi^-1(F_alpha) in mathcalN$, we have that $nu(pi^-1(F_alpha))=0$ and hence $nu(E_alpha)=0$. Thus, $|tildepi(f)|_infty le |f|_infty< infty$.
Please let me know if there is something wrong with this proof. Thanks for the help!!
analysis measure-theory lp-spaces measurable-functions
analysis measure-theory lp-spaces measurable-functions
asked 2 days ago
tattwamasi amrutamtattwamasi amrutam
8,25721643
8,25721643
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The function $tilde pi $ is not well defined function unless you make an extra assumption on $pi$. You need the condition $nu (pi ^-1(E))=0$ whenever $E in mathcal N$ and $eta(E)=0$. You don't need the stronger assumption that $eta =nu circ pi^-1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3141717%2fcorrect-formulation-of-a-map-between-two-measurable-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The function $tilde pi $ is not well defined function unless you make an extra assumption on $pi$. You need the condition $nu (pi ^-1(E))=0$ whenever $E in mathcal N$ and $eta(E)=0$. You don't need the stronger assumption that $eta =nu circ pi^-1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The function $tilde pi $ is not well defined function unless you make an extra assumption on $pi$. You need the condition $nu (pi ^-1(E))=0$ whenever $E in mathcal N$ and $eta(E)=0$. You don't need the stronger assumption that $eta =nu circ pi^-1$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The function $tilde pi $ is not well defined function unless you make an extra assumption on $pi$. You need the condition $nu (pi ^-1(E))=0$ whenever $E in mathcal N$ and $eta(E)=0$. You don't need the stronger assumption that $eta =nu circ pi^-1$.
$endgroup$
The function $tilde pi $ is not well defined function unless you make an extra assumption on $pi$. You need the condition $nu (pi ^-1(E))=0$ whenever $E in mathcal N$ and $eta(E)=0$. You don't need the stronger assumption that $eta =nu circ pi^-1$.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
66.3k52867
66.3k52867
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3141717%2fcorrect-formulation-of-a-map-between-two-measurable-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown