Matrix product and eigen values Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Eigenvalues of product of a matrix and a diagonal matrixEigenvalues of product of a matrix and a diagonal matrixRelation between trace and Ky Fan normsymmetric normalized Graph Laplacian and symmetric normalized Adjacency matrix eigenvaluesWeighted undirected graphs, complex Laplacian, complex eigenvalues & spectral cluseringWhat is the multiplicity of the largest eigenvalue of a graph?What's the relationship between the rank and eigenvalues of symmetric positive semidefinite matrix (real domain)?Laplacian spectrum of directed network (digraph) and its complementMaximizing the smallest positive eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrix via SDPIs the off-diagonal part of a covariance matrix, $M = Sigma -operatorname diag(Sigma)$ studied?Why are we interested in finding the spectrum of products of graphs?

Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages

Why does Python start at index -1 when indexing a list from the end?

Models of set theory where not every set can be linearly ordered

Super Attribute Position on Product Page Magento 1

Should I call the interviewer directly, if HR aren't responding?

What is this single-engine low-wing propeller plane?

Antler Helmet: Can it work?

Single word antonym of "flightless"

iPhone Wallpaper?

When is phishing education going too far?

What is the musical term for a note that continously plays through a melody?

Why is black pepper both grey and black?

How to recreate this effect in Photoshop?

How to motivate offshore teams and trust them to deliver?

How does a Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death feature work with Touch-range spells delivered by familiars?

Proof involving the spectral radius and the Jordan canonical form

Sorting numerically

Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

Why was the term "discrete" used in discrete logarithm?

How can I fade player character when he goes inside or outside of the area?

How can players work together to take actions that are otherwise impossible?

Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?

If a contract sometimes uses the wrong name, is it still valid?



Matrix product and eigen values



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Eigenvalues of product of a matrix and a diagonal matrixEigenvalues of product of a matrix and a diagonal matrixRelation between trace and Ky Fan normsymmetric normalized Graph Laplacian and symmetric normalized Adjacency matrix eigenvaluesWeighted undirected graphs, complex Laplacian, complex eigenvalues & spectral cluseringWhat is the multiplicity of the largest eigenvalue of a graph?What's the relationship between the rank and eigenvalues of symmetric positive semidefinite matrix (real domain)?Laplacian spectrum of directed network (digraph) and its complementMaximizing the smallest positive eigenvalue of the Laplacian matrix via SDPIs the off-diagonal part of a covariance matrix, $M = Sigma -operatorname diag(Sigma)$ studied?Why are we interested in finding the spectrum of products of graphs?










1












$begingroup$


Is there any relationship between eigenvalues(or spectrum) of graph Laplacian matrix and the eigenvalues of the product of a real symmetric matrix and the Laplacian matrix?



My problem at hand is as follows :



Let A=L*B.



What is the relationship between spectrum (or eigenvalues) of L with the spectrum of A?



L is Laplacian of an undirected graph, hence real symmetric and singular.
B is a real symmetric matrix.



I want to show that if I increase the magnitude of eigenvalues of L, the eigenvalues of A will also increase. However, all I could find was a trace inequality relationship, and inequality doesn't necessarily lead to any conclusion.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    If you count geometric multiplicities, eigenvalues may disappear. Does that count as "increasing"? For example if $$ L_1 = beginbmatrix0&0\0&0endbmatrix qquad L_2 = beginbmatrix1&-1\-1&1endbmatrix qquad B=beginbmatrix-1 &0 \ 0 & 1endbmatrix$$ then going from $L_1$ to $L_2$ changes the eigenvalues from $0$ and $0$ to $0$ and $2$, certainly as good an increase as we can hope for given that the $L$s are always singular. But the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ are $0$ and $0$ whereas $L_2B$ only has a single $0$. Is that an increase?
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 11:17











  • $begingroup$
    The topmost question in the "Related" list looks pretty relevant, though it is more picky about the choice for $B$.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 11:26










  • $begingroup$
    @HenningMakholm Thank you for the comment. Regarding your first question, I could not understand the difference between the two in "eigenvalues of L1B are 0 and 0 whereas L2B only has a single 0". And were you trying to give a counterexample for the statement? If B is an identity matrix, then L2B would have eigenvalues 0 and 2. I am looking for an analytical proof which says that by increasing eigenvalue of one matrix, the eigenvalue of the product is also increased. I am getting that trend in my case while using the values, but an analytical proof is what I am after.
    $endgroup$
    – Abhiram V P
    Mar 26 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    I am asking you whether this counts as a counterexample for you, since $L_1B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $2$ and $L_2B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $1$ and no other eigenvalues. One of the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ goes from being $0$ to not being there at all! Do you consider that to be an "increase" or not?
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 12:41










  • $begingroup$
    (And I don't understand why you say "If $B$ is an identity matrix", since I have explicitly specified what $B$ in my example is -- and that is not the identity matrix").
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 12:44















1












$begingroup$


Is there any relationship between eigenvalues(or spectrum) of graph Laplacian matrix and the eigenvalues of the product of a real symmetric matrix and the Laplacian matrix?



My problem at hand is as follows :



Let A=L*B.



What is the relationship between spectrum (or eigenvalues) of L with the spectrum of A?



L is Laplacian of an undirected graph, hence real symmetric and singular.
B is a real symmetric matrix.



I want to show that if I increase the magnitude of eigenvalues of L, the eigenvalues of A will also increase. However, all I could find was a trace inequality relationship, and inequality doesn't necessarily lead to any conclusion.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    If you count geometric multiplicities, eigenvalues may disappear. Does that count as "increasing"? For example if $$ L_1 = beginbmatrix0&0\0&0endbmatrix qquad L_2 = beginbmatrix1&-1\-1&1endbmatrix qquad B=beginbmatrix-1 &0 \ 0 & 1endbmatrix$$ then going from $L_1$ to $L_2$ changes the eigenvalues from $0$ and $0$ to $0$ and $2$, certainly as good an increase as we can hope for given that the $L$s are always singular. But the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ are $0$ and $0$ whereas $L_2B$ only has a single $0$. Is that an increase?
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 11:17











  • $begingroup$
    The topmost question in the "Related" list looks pretty relevant, though it is more picky about the choice for $B$.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 11:26










  • $begingroup$
    @HenningMakholm Thank you for the comment. Regarding your first question, I could not understand the difference between the two in "eigenvalues of L1B are 0 and 0 whereas L2B only has a single 0". And were you trying to give a counterexample for the statement? If B is an identity matrix, then L2B would have eigenvalues 0 and 2. I am looking for an analytical proof which says that by increasing eigenvalue of one matrix, the eigenvalue of the product is also increased. I am getting that trend in my case while using the values, but an analytical proof is what I am after.
    $endgroup$
    – Abhiram V P
    Mar 26 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    I am asking you whether this counts as a counterexample for you, since $L_1B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $2$ and $L_2B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $1$ and no other eigenvalues. One of the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ goes from being $0$ to not being there at all! Do you consider that to be an "increase" or not?
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 12:41










  • $begingroup$
    (And I don't understand why you say "If $B$ is an identity matrix", since I have explicitly specified what $B$ in my example is -- and that is not the identity matrix").
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 12:44













1












1








1


0



$begingroup$


Is there any relationship between eigenvalues(or spectrum) of graph Laplacian matrix and the eigenvalues of the product of a real symmetric matrix and the Laplacian matrix?



My problem at hand is as follows :



Let A=L*B.



What is the relationship between spectrum (or eigenvalues) of L with the spectrum of A?



L is Laplacian of an undirected graph, hence real symmetric and singular.
B is a real symmetric matrix.



I want to show that if I increase the magnitude of eigenvalues of L, the eigenvalues of A will also increase. However, all I could find was a trace inequality relationship, and inequality doesn't necessarily lead to any conclusion.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Is there any relationship between eigenvalues(or spectrum) of graph Laplacian matrix and the eigenvalues of the product of a real symmetric matrix and the Laplacian matrix?



My problem at hand is as follows :



Let A=L*B.



What is the relationship between spectrum (or eigenvalues) of L with the spectrum of A?



L is Laplacian of an undirected graph, hence real symmetric and singular.
B is a real symmetric matrix.



I want to show that if I increase the magnitude of eigenvalues of L, the eigenvalues of A will also increase. However, all I could find was a trace inequality relationship, and inequality doesn't necessarily lead to any conclusion.







matrices graph-theory eigenvalues-eigenvectors trace graph-laplacian






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 26 at 10:37









Abhiram V PAbhiram V P

255




255











  • $begingroup$
    If you count geometric multiplicities, eigenvalues may disappear. Does that count as "increasing"? For example if $$ L_1 = beginbmatrix0&0\0&0endbmatrix qquad L_2 = beginbmatrix1&-1\-1&1endbmatrix qquad B=beginbmatrix-1 &0 \ 0 & 1endbmatrix$$ then going from $L_1$ to $L_2$ changes the eigenvalues from $0$ and $0$ to $0$ and $2$, certainly as good an increase as we can hope for given that the $L$s are always singular. But the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ are $0$ and $0$ whereas $L_2B$ only has a single $0$. Is that an increase?
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 11:17











  • $begingroup$
    The topmost question in the "Related" list looks pretty relevant, though it is more picky about the choice for $B$.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 11:26










  • $begingroup$
    @HenningMakholm Thank you for the comment. Regarding your first question, I could not understand the difference between the two in "eigenvalues of L1B are 0 and 0 whereas L2B only has a single 0". And were you trying to give a counterexample for the statement? If B is an identity matrix, then L2B would have eigenvalues 0 and 2. I am looking for an analytical proof which says that by increasing eigenvalue of one matrix, the eigenvalue of the product is also increased. I am getting that trend in my case while using the values, but an analytical proof is what I am after.
    $endgroup$
    – Abhiram V P
    Mar 26 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    I am asking you whether this counts as a counterexample for you, since $L_1B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $2$ and $L_2B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $1$ and no other eigenvalues. One of the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ goes from being $0$ to not being there at all! Do you consider that to be an "increase" or not?
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 12:41










  • $begingroup$
    (And I don't understand why you say "If $B$ is an identity matrix", since I have explicitly specified what $B$ in my example is -- and that is not the identity matrix").
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 12:44
















  • $begingroup$
    If you count geometric multiplicities, eigenvalues may disappear. Does that count as "increasing"? For example if $$ L_1 = beginbmatrix0&0\0&0endbmatrix qquad L_2 = beginbmatrix1&-1\-1&1endbmatrix qquad B=beginbmatrix-1 &0 \ 0 & 1endbmatrix$$ then going from $L_1$ to $L_2$ changes the eigenvalues from $0$ and $0$ to $0$ and $2$, certainly as good an increase as we can hope for given that the $L$s are always singular. But the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ are $0$ and $0$ whereas $L_2B$ only has a single $0$. Is that an increase?
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 11:17











  • $begingroup$
    The topmost question in the "Related" list looks pretty relevant, though it is more picky about the choice for $B$.
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 11:26










  • $begingroup$
    @HenningMakholm Thank you for the comment. Regarding your first question, I could not understand the difference between the two in "eigenvalues of L1B are 0 and 0 whereas L2B only has a single 0". And were you trying to give a counterexample for the statement? If B is an identity matrix, then L2B would have eigenvalues 0 and 2. I am looking for an analytical proof which says that by increasing eigenvalue of one matrix, the eigenvalue of the product is also increased. I am getting that trend in my case while using the values, but an analytical proof is what I am after.
    $endgroup$
    – Abhiram V P
    Mar 26 at 12:38










  • $begingroup$
    I am asking you whether this counts as a counterexample for you, since $L_1B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $2$ and $L_2B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $1$ and no other eigenvalues. One of the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ goes from being $0$ to not being there at all! Do you consider that to be an "increase" or not?
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 12:41










  • $begingroup$
    (And I don't understand why you say "If $B$ is an identity matrix", since I have explicitly specified what $B$ in my example is -- and that is not the identity matrix").
    $endgroup$
    – Henning Makholm
    Mar 26 at 12:44















$begingroup$
If you count geometric multiplicities, eigenvalues may disappear. Does that count as "increasing"? For example if $$ L_1 = beginbmatrix0&0\0&0endbmatrix qquad L_2 = beginbmatrix1&-1\-1&1endbmatrix qquad B=beginbmatrix-1 &0 \ 0 & 1endbmatrix$$ then going from $L_1$ to $L_2$ changes the eigenvalues from $0$ and $0$ to $0$ and $2$, certainly as good an increase as we can hope for given that the $L$s are always singular. But the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ are $0$ and $0$ whereas $L_2B$ only has a single $0$. Is that an increase?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:17





$begingroup$
If you count geometric multiplicities, eigenvalues may disappear. Does that count as "increasing"? For example if $$ L_1 = beginbmatrix0&0\0&0endbmatrix qquad L_2 = beginbmatrix1&-1\-1&1endbmatrix qquad B=beginbmatrix-1 &0 \ 0 & 1endbmatrix$$ then going from $L_1$ to $L_2$ changes the eigenvalues from $0$ and $0$ to $0$ and $2$, certainly as good an increase as we can hope for given that the $L$s are always singular. But the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ are $0$ and $0$ whereas $L_2B$ only has a single $0$. Is that an increase?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:17













$begingroup$
The topmost question in the "Related" list looks pretty relevant, though it is more picky about the choice for $B$.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:26




$begingroup$
The topmost question in the "Related" list looks pretty relevant, though it is more picky about the choice for $B$.
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 11:26












$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for the comment. Regarding your first question, I could not understand the difference between the two in "eigenvalues of L1B are 0 and 0 whereas L2B only has a single 0". And were you trying to give a counterexample for the statement? If B is an identity matrix, then L2B would have eigenvalues 0 and 2. I am looking for an analytical proof which says that by increasing eigenvalue of one matrix, the eigenvalue of the product is also increased. I am getting that trend in my case while using the values, but an analytical proof is what I am after.
$endgroup$
– Abhiram V P
Mar 26 at 12:38




$begingroup$
@HenningMakholm Thank you for the comment. Regarding your first question, I could not understand the difference between the two in "eigenvalues of L1B are 0 and 0 whereas L2B only has a single 0". And were you trying to give a counterexample for the statement? If B is an identity matrix, then L2B would have eigenvalues 0 and 2. I am looking for an analytical proof which says that by increasing eigenvalue of one matrix, the eigenvalue of the product is also increased. I am getting that trend in my case while using the values, but an analytical proof is what I am after.
$endgroup$
– Abhiram V P
Mar 26 at 12:38












$begingroup$
I am asking you whether this counts as a counterexample for you, since $L_1B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $2$ and $L_2B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $1$ and no other eigenvalues. One of the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ goes from being $0$ to not being there at all! Do you consider that to be an "increase" or not?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:41




$begingroup$
I am asking you whether this counts as a counterexample for you, since $L_1B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $2$ and $L_2B$ has the eigenvalue $0$ with geometric multiplicity $1$ and no other eigenvalues. One of the eigenvalues of $L_1B$ goes from being $0$ to not being there at all! Do you consider that to be an "increase" or not?
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:41












$begingroup$
(And I don't understand why you say "If $B$ is an identity matrix", since I have explicitly specified what $B$ in my example is -- and that is not the identity matrix").
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:44




$begingroup$
(And I don't understand why you say "If $B$ is an identity matrix", since I have explicitly specified what $B$ in my example is -- and that is not the identity matrix").
$endgroup$
– Henning Makholm
Mar 26 at 12:44










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163012%2fmatrix-product-and-eigen-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163012%2fmatrix-product-and-eigen-values%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye