Using Ito's Lemma to compute the process followed by a functionApplying Geometric Brownian Motion itself into Ito's LemmaIto's Lemma and Geometric Brownian Motion With JumpsHow to compute the quadratic variation of a compound poisson process?Requirements for Ito's LemmaIto Formula for Stochastic IntegralUsing Ito's lemma to find a SDEFollowing a derivation using Ito's lemmaDistribution of stochastic process and Ito's lemmaUsing Multivariate Ito's Lemma on function of Ito integralIto's Lemma for a Brownian motion

How can a jailer prevent the Forge Cleric's Artisan's Blessing from being used?

Resetting two CD4017 counters simultaneously, only one resets

Stereotypical names

Freedom of speech and where it applies

How do I repair my stair bannister?

How can I raise concerns with a new DM about XP splitting?

Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?

Why isn't KTEX's runway designation 10/28 instead of 9/27?

Why does this part of the Space Shuttle launch pad seem to be floating in air?

What is the term when two people sing in harmony, but they aren't singing the same notes?

Can I rely on these GitHub repository files?

Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?

Why are all the doors on Ferenginar (the Ferengi home world) far shorter than the average Ferengi?

How to prevent YouTube from showing already watched videos?

A workplace installs custom certificates on personal devices, can this be used to decrypt HTTPS traffic?

I2C signal and power over long range (10meter cable)

How can I successfully establish a nationwide combat training program for a large country?

Invariance of results when scaling explanatory variables in logistic regression, is there a proof?

Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?

Pronouncing Homer as in modern Greek

What (else) happened July 1st 1858 in London?

Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?

Are taller landing gear bad for aircraft, particulary large airliners?

Simulating a probability of 1 of 2^N with less than N random bits



Using Ito's Lemma to compute the process followed by a function


Applying Geometric Brownian Motion itself into Ito's LemmaIto's Lemma and Geometric Brownian Motion With JumpsHow to compute the quadratic variation of a compound poisson process?Requirements for Ito's LemmaIto Formula for Stochastic IntegralUsing Ito's lemma to find a SDEFollowing a derivation using Ito's lemmaDistribution of stochastic process and Ito's lemmaUsing Multivariate Ito's Lemma on function of Ito integralIto's Lemma for a Brownian motion













-1












$begingroup$


I have the following process $$dS_t = mu S_t dt + sigma S_t dz_t $$ and the function $$f(S) = S^2$$ where



$$fracpartial fpartial t = 0, fracpartial fpartial S = 2S, fracpartial^2 fpartial S^2 = 2, df = 2SdS + frac122 cdot dSdS$$



I have that using Ito's Lemma: $$df_t = 2S_t(mu S_td_t + sigma S_tdz_t) + frac122cdot sigma S_tdz_t cdot sigma S_tdz_t = (2 mu S_t^2 + sigma^2 S_t^2)dt + 2 sigma S_t^2dz_t$$ or $$df_t = (2 mu + sigma^2)f_t dt + 2sigma f_tdz_t. $$ Can someone explain how this works for this specific example for me? I realise that $$ df = left( fracpartial fpartial t + mu fracpartial fpartial s + frac12sigma^2 fracpartial^2fpartial S^2 right) dt + sigma fracpartial fpartial sdz_t $$ but i cant understand how $$ df = 2SdS + frac122 cdot dSdS$$ was obtained from that expression? Also, i don't understand how the larger first expression for $df_t$ was constructed? Any help would be great, thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Which version of Ito's lemma do you know? Without this information, it's not possible to give a reasoable answer to your question. Moreover, it would be good to know where exactly you are stuck when applying Itô's lemma. Currently you just wrote up the equations which you are supposed to end up with (... at least as far as I understand) but you do not give your own thoughts/computations.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Mar 17 at 7:05
















-1












$begingroup$


I have the following process $$dS_t = mu S_t dt + sigma S_t dz_t $$ and the function $$f(S) = S^2$$ where



$$fracpartial fpartial t = 0, fracpartial fpartial S = 2S, fracpartial^2 fpartial S^2 = 2, df = 2SdS + frac122 cdot dSdS$$



I have that using Ito's Lemma: $$df_t = 2S_t(mu S_td_t + sigma S_tdz_t) + frac122cdot sigma S_tdz_t cdot sigma S_tdz_t = (2 mu S_t^2 + sigma^2 S_t^2)dt + 2 sigma S_t^2dz_t$$ or $$df_t = (2 mu + sigma^2)f_t dt + 2sigma f_tdz_t. $$ Can someone explain how this works for this specific example for me? I realise that $$ df = left( fracpartial fpartial t + mu fracpartial fpartial s + frac12sigma^2 fracpartial^2fpartial S^2 right) dt + sigma fracpartial fpartial sdz_t $$ but i cant understand how $$ df = 2SdS + frac122 cdot dSdS$$ was obtained from that expression? Also, i don't understand how the larger first expression for $df_t$ was constructed? Any help would be great, thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Which version of Ito's lemma do you know? Without this information, it's not possible to give a reasoable answer to your question. Moreover, it would be good to know where exactly you are stuck when applying Itô's lemma. Currently you just wrote up the equations which you are supposed to end up with (... at least as far as I understand) but you do not give your own thoughts/computations.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Mar 17 at 7:05














-1












-1








-1


1



$begingroup$


I have the following process $$dS_t = mu S_t dt + sigma S_t dz_t $$ and the function $$f(S) = S^2$$ where



$$fracpartial fpartial t = 0, fracpartial fpartial S = 2S, fracpartial^2 fpartial S^2 = 2, df = 2SdS + frac122 cdot dSdS$$



I have that using Ito's Lemma: $$df_t = 2S_t(mu S_td_t + sigma S_tdz_t) + frac122cdot sigma S_tdz_t cdot sigma S_tdz_t = (2 mu S_t^2 + sigma^2 S_t^2)dt + 2 sigma S_t^2dz_t$$ or $$df_t = (2 mu + sigma^2)f_t dt + 2sigma f_tdz_t. $$ Can someone explain how this works for this specific example for me? I realise that $$ df = left( fracpartial fpartial t + mu fracpartial fpartial s + frac12sigma^2 fracpartial^2fpartial S^2 right) dt + sigma fracpartial fpartial sdz_t $$ but i cant understand how $$ df = 2SdS + frac122 cdot dSdS$$ was obtained from that expression? Also, i don't understand how the larger first expression for $df_t$ was constructed? Any help would be great, thanks!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have the following process $$dS_t = mu S_t dt + sigma S_t dz_t $$ and the function $$f(S) = S^2$$ where



$$fracpartial fpartial t = 0, fracpartial fpartial S = 2S, fracpartial^2 fpartial S^2 = 2, df = 2SdS + frac122 cdot dSdS$$



I have that using Ito's Lemma: $$df_t = 2S_t(mu S_td_t + sigma S_tdz_t) + frac122cdot sigma S_tdz_t cdot sigma S_tdz_t = (2 mu S_t^2 + sigma^2 S_t^2)dt + 2 sigma S_t^2dz_t$$ or $$df_t = (2 mu + sigma^2)f_t dt + 2sigma f_tdz_t. $$ Can someone explain how this works for this specific example for me? I realise that $$ df = left( fracpartial fpartial t + mu fracpartial fpartial s + frac12sigma^2 fracpartial^2fpartial S^2 right) dt + sigma fracpartial fpartial sdz_t $$ but i cant understand how $$ df = 2SdS + frac122 cdot dSdS$$ was obtained from that expression? Also, i don't understand how the larger first expression for $df_t$ was constructed? Any help would be great, thanks!







pde stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus stochastic-analysis stochastic-pde






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 16 at 21:29









HallaoHallao

12




12











  • $begingroup$
    Which version of Ito's lemma do you know? Without this information, it's not possible to give a reasoable answer to your question. Moreover, it would be good to know where exactly you are stuck when applying Itô's lemma. Currently you just wrote up the equations which you are supposed to end up with (... at least as far as I understand) but you do not give your own thoughts/computations.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Mar 17 at 7:05

















  • $begingroup$
    Which version of Ito's lemma do you know? Without this information, it's not possible to give a reasoable answer to your question. Moreover, it would be good to know where exactly you are stuck when applying Itô's lemma. Currently you just wrote up the equations which you are supposed to end up with (... at least as far as I understand) but you do not give your own thoughts/computations.
    $endgroup$
    – saz
    Mar 17 at 7:05
















$begingroup$
Which version of Ito's lemma do you know? Without this information, it's not possible to give a reasoable answer to your question. Moreover, it would be good to know where exactly you are stuck when applying Itô's lemma. Currently you just wrote up the equations which you are supposed to end up with (... at least as far as I understand) but you do not give your own thoughts/computations.
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 17 at 7:05





$begingroup$
Which version of Ito's lemma do you know? Without this information, it's not possible to give a reasoable answer to your question. Moreover, it would be good to know where exactly you are stuck when applying Itô's lemma. Currently you just wrote up the equations which you are supposed to end up with (... at least as far as I understand) but you do not give your own thoughts/computations.
$endgroup$
– saz
Mar 17 at 7:05











0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150876%2fusing-itos-lemma-to-compute-the-process-followed-by-a-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150876%2fusing-itos-lemma-to-compute-the-process-followed-by-a-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye