CEP for (distributive) lattices and groups?CEP for Abelian groups and latticesLattices are congruence-distributiveCEP for Abelian groups and latticesEvery group and ring is congruence-permutable , but not necessarily congruence-distributiveProof that the lattice of fully invariant congruences is a sublattice of the lattice of all congruences$mathbfN_5$ as a congruence latticeSemilattices are congruence-semi-distributivePrime ideal theorem for modular lattices?If a variety of algebras V has the CEP then $HS(K) = SH(K), K subseteq V$Jónsson's lemma : A variety generated by finitely many finite lattices has finitely many subvarieties.Is there any duality for distributive lattices?
Can I create an upright 7-foot × 5-foot wall with the Minor Illusion spell?
Are taller landing gear bad for aircraft, particulary large airliners?
The One-Electron Universe postulate is true - what simple change can I make to change the whole universe?
Would it be legal for a US State to ban exports of a natural resource?
What does 사자 in this picture means?
Giant Toughroad SLR 2 for 200 miles in two days, will it make it?
Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?
Lightning Web Component - do I need to track changes for every single input field in a form
Why are on-board computers allowed to change controls without notifying the pilots?
Can the harmonic series explain the origin of the major scale?
Is there an wasy way to program in Tikz something like the one in the image?
A workplace installs custom certificates on personal devices, can this be used to decrypt HTTPS traffic?
Can I rely on these GitHub repository files?
Partial sums of primes
I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?
Meta programming: Declare a new struct on the fly
What do you call the infoboxes with text and sometimes images on the side of a page we find in textbooks?
Word describing multiple paths to the same abstract outcome
Can the electrostatic force be infinite in magnitude?
What will be the benefits of Brexit?
Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?
How to check participants in at events?
What does the "3am" section means in manpages?
Identify a stage play about a VR experience in which participants are encouraged to simulate performing horrific activities
CEP for (distributive) lattices and groups?
CEP for Abelian groups and latticesLattices are congruence-distributiveCEP for Abelian groups and latticesEvery group and ring is congruence-permutable , but not necessarily congruence-distributiveProof that the lattice of fully invariant congruences is a sublattice of the lattice of all congruences$mathbfN_5$ as a congruence latticeSemilattices are congruence-semi-distributivePrime ideal theorem for modular lattices?If a variety of algebras V has the CEP then $HS(K) = SH(K), K subseteq V$Jónsson's lemma : A variety generated by finitely many finite lattices has finitely many subvarieties.Is there any duality for distributive lattices?
$begingroup$
An algebra $A$ has the congruence extension property (CEP) if for every $Ble A$ and $thetainoperatornameCon(B)$ there is a $varphiinoperatornameCon(A)$ such that $theta =varphicap(Btimes B)$. A class $K$ of algebras has the CEP if every algebra in the class has the CEP.
- Does the class of all lattices has CEP?
- Does the class of all groups has CEP?
- Does the class of all distributive lattices has CEP?
group-theory lattice-orders universal-algebra congruence-relations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An algebra $A$ has the congruence extension property (CEP) if for every $Ble A$ and $thetainoperatornameCon(B)$ there is a $varphiinoperatornameCon(A)$ such that $theta =varphicap(Btimes B)$. A class $K$ of algebras has the CEP if every algebra in the class has the CEP.
- Does the class of all lattices has CEP?
- Does the class of all groups has CEP?
- Does the class of all distributive lattices has CEP?
group-theory lattice-orders universal-algebra congruence-relations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What is the definition of $operatornameCon(A)$?
$endgroup$
– Santana Afton
Mar 17 at 0:30
$begingroup$
Since in groups congruences correspond to normal subgroups, what you are asking for groups would be that given a group $G$, and a subgroup $H$, if $Ntriangleleft H$ then there exists $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H=N$. It is now easy to see that this does not hold, for example by taking $G=A_5$ which is simple, but all of whose proper subgroups that are not of prime order are not simple.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:36
$begingroup$
@SantanaAfton: A congruence on $A$ is an equivalence relation on $A$ which, when viewed as a subset of $Atimes A$, is also a subalgebra of $Atimes A$ (with the induced structure); they are the objects that play the role of normal subgroups for groups and ideals for rings, to define quotients. $mathrmCon(A)$ is the collection of all congruences on $A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:38
$begingroup$
related (possibly duplicate) question: link
$endgroup$
– Eran
Mar 18 at 18:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An algebra $A$ has the congruence extension property (CEP) if for every $Ble A$ and $thetainoperatornameCon(B)$ there is a $varphiinoperatornameCon(A)$ such that $theta =varphicap(Btimes B)$. A class $K$ of algebras has the CEP if every algebra in the class has the CEP.
- Does the class of all lattices has CEP?
- Does the class of all groups has CEP?
- Does the class of all distributive lattices has CEP?
group-theory lattice-orders universal-algebra congruence-relations
$endgroup$
An algebra $A$ has the congruence extension property (CEP) if for every $Ble A$ and $thetainoperatornameCon(B)$ there is a $varphiinoperatornameCon(A)$ such that $theta =varphicap(Btimes B)$. A class $K$ of algebras has the CEP if every algebra in the class has the CEP.
- Does the class of all lattices has CEP?
- Does the class of all groups has CEP?
- Does the class of all distributive lattices has CEP?
group-theory lattice-orders universal-algebra congruence-relations
group-theory lattice-orders universal-algebra congruence-relations
edited Mar 17 at 0:33
Santana Afton
2,9932629
2,9932629
asked Mar 17 at 0:05
ljubinaaljubinaa
274
274
$begingroup$
What is the definition of $operatornameCon(A)$?
$endgroup$
– Santana Afton
Mar 17 at 0:30
$begingroup$
Since in groups congruences correspond to normal subgroups, what you are asking for groups would be that given a group $G$, and a subgroup $H$, if $Ntriangleleft H$ then there exists $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H=N$. It is now easy to see that this does not hold, for example by taking $G=A_5$ which is simple, but all of whose proper subgroups that are not of prime order are not simple.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:36
$begingroup$
@SantanaAfton: A congruence on $A$ is an equivalence relation on $A$ which, when viewed as a subset of $Atimes A$, is also a subalgebra of $Atimes A$ (with the induced structure); they are the objects that play the role of normal subgroups for groups and ideals for rings, to define quotients. $mathrmCon(A)$ is the collection of all congruences on $A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:38
$begingroup$
related (possibly duplicate) question: link
$endgroup$
– Eran
Mar 18 at 18:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What is the definition of $operatornameCon(A)$?
$endgroup$
– Santana Afton
Mar 17 at 0:30
$begingroup$
Since in groups congruences correspond to normal subgroups, what you are asking for groups would be that given a group $G$, and a subgroup $H$, if $Ntriangleleft H$ then there exists $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H=N$. It is now easy to see that this does not hold, for example by taking $G=A_5$ which is simple, but all of whose proper subgroups that are not of prime order are not simple.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:36
$begingroup$
@SantanaAfton: A congruence on $A$ is an equivalence relation on $A$ which, when viewed as a subset of $Atimes A$, is also a subalgebra of $Atimes A$ (with the induced structure); they are the objects that play the role of normal subgroups for groups and ideals for rings, to define quotients. $mathrmCon(A)$ is the collection of all congruences on $A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:38
$begingroup$
related (possibly duplicate) question: link
$endgroup$
– Eran
Mar 18 at 18:24
$begingroup$
What is the definition of $operatornameCon(A)$?
$endgroup$
– Santana Afton
Mar 17 at 0:30
$begingroup$
What is the definition of $operatornameCon(A)$?
$endgroup$
– Santana Afton
Mar 17 at 0:30
$begingroup$
Since in groups congruences correspond to normal subgroups, what you are asking for groups would be that given a group $G$, and a subgroup $H$, if $Ntriangleleft H$ then there exists $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H=N$. It is now easy to see that this does not hold, for example by taking $G=A_5$ which is simple, but all of whose proper subgroups that are not of prime order are not simple.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:36
$begingroup$
Since in groups congruences correspond to normal subgroups, what you are asking for groups would be that given a group $G$, and a subgroup $H$, if $Ntriangleleft H$ then there exists $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H=N$. It is now easy to see that this does not hold, for example by taking $G=A_5$ which is simple, but all of whose proper subgroups that are not of prime order are not simple.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:36
$begingroup$
@SantanaAfton: A congruence on $A$ is an equivalence relation on $A$ which, when viewed as a subset of $Atimes A$, is also a subalgebra of $Atimes A$ (with the induced structure); they are the objects that play the role of normal subgroups for groups and ideals for rings, to define quotients. $mathrmCon(A)$ is the collection of all congruences on $A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:38
$begingroup$
@SantanaAfton: A congruence on $A$ is an equivalence relation on $A$ which, when viewed as a subset of $Atimes A$, is also a subalgebra of $Atimes A$ (with the induced structure); they are the objects that play the role of normal subgroups for groups and ideals for rings, to define quotients. $mathrmCon(A)$ is the collection of all congruences on $A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:38
$begingroup$
related (possibly duplicate) question: link
$endgroup$
– Eran
Mar 18 at 18:24
$begingroup$
related (possibly duplicate) question: link
$endgroup$
– Eran
Mar 18 at 18:24
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The variety of all groups does not have the property. Congruences correspond to normal subgroups, so you are essentially asking whether if $Hleq G$, and $Ntriangleleft H$, does there always exist an $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H= N$. This does not hold; for example, if $G=A_5$, $H=A_4$, and $N$ is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup of $A_4$, then you cannot find any appropriate $M$.
The variety of all latices does not have the property either. Let $L$ be the nondistributive lattice $M_3$, with elements $0$, $1$, $x$, $y$, and $z$ (where the join of any distinct elements of $x,y,z$ is $1$, and the meet is $0$). Let $M$ be the sublattice $0,x,1$. Then let $Phi$ be the congruence in $M$ that identifies $0$ and $x$.
Let $Psi$ be a congruence on $L$ that identifies $0$ and $x$. Then it must identify $0vee y=y$ with $xvee y=1$; similarly, it must identify $0vee z = z$ with $xvee z = 1$. Thus, $y$, $z$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $zwedge 1 = z$ must be identified with $zwedge y = 0$, so all of $0$, $z$, $y$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $x$ is identified with $1$ as well, so that $Phi$ is a proper subcongruence of $Psi|_M$. Thus, $M_3$ does not have the congruence extension property.
In fact, I believe (but don’t have access to my textbooks right now) that the Congruence Extension Property precisely characterizes the distributive lattices among all latices (see for instance the opening line of this paper ) which would give an affirmative answer to your final question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150999%2fcep-for-distributive-lattices-and-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The variety of all groups does not have the property. Congruences correspond to normal subgroups, so you are essentially asking whether if $Hleq G$, and $Ntriangleleft H$, does there always exist an $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H= N$. This does not hold; for example, if $G=A_5$, $H=A_4$, and $N$ is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup of $A_4$, then you cannot find any appropriate $M$.
The variety of all latices does not have the property either. Let $L$ be the nondistributive lattice $M_3$, with elements $0$, $1$, $x$, $y$, and $z$ (where the join of any distinct elements of $x,y,z$ is $1$, and the meet is $0$). Let $M$ be the sublattice $0,x,1$. Then let $Phi$ be the congruence in $M$ that identifies $0$ and $x$.
Let $Psi$ be a congruence on $L$ that identifies $0$ and $x$. Then it must identify $0vee y=y$ with $xvee y=1$; similarly, it must identify $0vee z = z$ with $xvee z = 1$. Thus, $y$, $z$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $zwedge 1 = z$ must be identified with $zwedge y = 0$, so all of $0$, $z$, $y$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $x$ is identified with $1$ as well, so that $Phi$ is a proper subcongruence of $Psi|_M$. Thus, $M_3$ does not have the congruence extension property.
In fact, I believe (but don’t have access to my textbooks right now) that the Congruence Extension Property precisely characterizes the distributive lattices among all latices (see for instance the opening line of this paper ) which would give an affirmative answer to your final question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The variety of all groups does not have the property. Congruences correspond to normal subgroups, so you are essentially asking whether if $Hleq G$, and $Ntriangleleft H$, does there always exist an $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H= N$. This does not hold; for example, if $G=A_5$, $H=A_4$, and $N$ is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup of $A_4$, then you cannot find any appropriate $M$.
The variety of all latices does not have the property either. Let $L$ be the nondistributive lattice $M_3$, with elements $0$, $1$, $x$, $y$, and $z$ (where the join of any distinct elements of $x,y,z$ is $1$, and the meet is $0$). Let $M$ be the sublattice $0,x,1$. Then let $Phi$ be the congruence in $M$ that identifies $0$ and $x$.
Let $Psi$ be a congruence on $L$ that identifies $0$ and $x$. Then it must identify $0vee y=y$ with $xvee y=1$; similarly, it must identify $0vee z = z$ with $xvee z = 1$. Thus, $y$, $z$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $zwedge 1 = z$ must be identified with $zwedge y = 0$, so all of $0$, $z$, $y$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $x$ is identified with $1$ as well, so that $Phi$ is a proper subcongruence of $Psi|_M$. Thus, $M_3$ does not have the congruence extension property.
In fact, I believe (but don’t have access to my textbooks right now) that the Congruence Extension Property precisely characterizes the distributive lattices among all latices (see for instance the opening line of this paper ) which would give an affirmative answer to your final question.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The variety of all groups does not have the property. Congruences correspond to normal subgroups, so you are essentially asking whether if $Hleq G$, and $Ntriangleleft H$, does there always exist an $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H= N$. This does not hold; for example, if $G=A_5$, $H=A_4$, and $N$ is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup of $A_4$, then you cannot find any appropriate $M$.
The variety of all latices does not have the property either. Let $L$ be the nondistributive lattice $M_3$, with elements $0$, $1$, $x$, $y$, and $z$ (where the join of any distinct elements of $x,y,z$ is $1$, and the meet is $0$). Let $M$ be the sublattice $0,x,1$. Then let $Phi$ be the congruence in $M$ that identifies $0$ and $x$.
Let $Psi$ be a congruence on $L$ that identifies $0$ and $x$. Then it must identify $0vee y=y$ with $xvee y=1$; similarly, it must identify $0vee z = z$ with $xvee z = 1$. Thus, $y$, $z$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $zwedge 1 = z$ must be identified with $zwedge y = 0$, so all of $0$, $z$, $y$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $x$ is identified with $1$ as well, so that $Phi$ is a proper subcongruence of $Psi|_M$. Thus, $M_3$ does not have the congruence extension property.
In fact, I believe (but don’t have access to my textbooks right now) that the Congruence Extension Property precisely characterizes the distributive lattices among all latices (see for instance the opening line of this paper ) which would give an affirmative answer to your final question.
$endgroup$
The variety of all groups does not have the property. Congruences correspond to normal subgroups, so you are essentially asking whether if $Hleq G$, and $Ntriangleleft H$, does there always exist an $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H= N$. This does not hold; for example, if $G=A_5$, $H=A_4$, and $N$ is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup of $A_4$, then you cannot find any appropriate $M$.
The variety of all latices does not have the property either. Let $L$ be the nondistributive lattice $M_3$, with elements $0$, $1$, $x$, $y$, and $z$ (where the join of any distinct elements of $x,y,z$ is $1$, and the meet is $0$). Let $M$ be the sublattice $0,x,1$. Then let $Phi$ be the congruence in $M$ that identifies $0$ and $x$.
Let $Psi$ be a congruence on $L$ that identifies $0$ and $x$. Then it must identify $0vee y=y$ with $xvee y=1$; similarly, it must identify $0vee z = z$ with $xvee z = 1$. Thus, $y$, $z$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $zwedge 1 = z$ must be identified with $zwedge y = 0$, so all of $0$, $z$, $y$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $x$ is identified with $1$ as well, so that $Phi$ is a proper subcongruence of $Psi|_M$. Thus, $M_3$ does not have the congruence extension property.
In fact, I believe (but don’t have access to my textbooks right now) that the Congruence Extension Property precisely characterizes the distributive lattices among all latices (see for instance the opening line of this paper ) which would give an affirmative answer to your final question.
edited Mar 17 at 7:27
answered Mar 17 at 1:39
Arturo MagidinArturo Magidin
265k34590920
265k34590920
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150999%2fcep-for-distributive-lattices-and-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
What is the definition of $operatornameCon(A)$?
$endgroup$
– Santana Afton
Mar 17 at 0:30
$begingroup$
Since in groups congruences correspond to normal subgroups, what you are asking for groups would be that given a group $G$, and a subgroup $H$, if $Ntriangleleft H$ then there exists $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H=N$. It is now easy to see that this does not hold, for example by taking $G=A_5$ which is simple, but all of whose proper subgroups that are not of prime order are not simple.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:36
$begingroup$
@SantanaAfton: A congruence on $A$ is an equivalence relation on $A$ which, when viewed as a subset of $Atimes A$, is also a subalgebra of $Atimes A$ (with the induced structure); they are the objects that play the role of normal subgroups for groups and ideals for rings, to define quotients. $mathrmCon(A)$ is the collection of all congruences on $A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:38
$begingroup$
related (possibly duplicate) question: link
$endgroup$
– Eran
Mar 18 at 18:24