CEP for (distributive) lattices and groups?CEP for Abelian groups and latticesLattices are congruence-distributiveCEP for Abelian groups and latticesEvery group and ring is congruence-permutable , but not necessarily congruence-distributiveProof that the lattice of fully invariant congruences is a sublattice of the lattice of all congruences$mathbfN_5$ as a congruence latticeSemilattices are congruence-semi-distributivePrime ideal theorem for modular lattices?If a variety of algebras V has the CEP then $HS(K) = SH(K), K subseteq V$Jónsson's lemma : A variety generated by finitely many finite lattices has finitely many subvarieties.Is there any duality for distributive lattices?

Can I create an upright 7-foot × 5-foot wall with the Minor Illusion spell?

Are taller landing gear bad for aircraft, particulary large airliners?

The One-Electron Universe postulate is true - what simple change can I make to change the whole universe?

Would it be legal for a US State to ban exports of a natural resource?

What does 사자 in this picture means?

Giant Toughroad SLR 2 for 200 miles in two days, will it make it?

Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?

Lightning Web Component - do I need to track changes for every single input field in a form

Why are on-board computers allowed to change controls without notifying the pilots?

Can the harmonic series explain the origin of the major scale?

Is there an wasy way to program in Tikz something like the one in the image?

A workplace installs custom certificates on personal devices, can this be used to decrypt HTTPS traffic?

Can I rely on these GitHub repository files?

Partial sums of primes

I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?

Meta programming: Declare a new struct on the fly

What do you call the infoboxes with text and sometimes images on the side of a page we find in textbooks?

Word describing multiple paths to the same abstract outcome

Can the electrostatic force be infinite in magnitude?

What will be the benefits of Brexit?

Can I use my Chinese passport to enter China after I acquired another citizenship?

How to check participants in at events?

What does the "3am" section means in manpages?

Identify a stage play about a VR experience in which participants are encouraged to simulate performing horrific activities



CEP for (distributive) lattices and groups?


CEP for Abelian groups and latticesLattices are congruence-distributiveCEP for Abelian groups and latticesEvery group and ring is congruence-permutable , but not necessarily congruence-distributiveProof that the lattice of fully invariant congruences is a sublattice of the lattice of all congruences$mathbfN_5$ as a congruence latticeSemilattices are congruence-semi-distributivePrime ideal theorem for modular lattices?If a variety of algebras V has the CEP then $HS(K) = SH(K), K subseteq V$Jónsson's lemma : A variety generated by finitely many finite lattices has finitely many subvarieties.Is there any duality for distributive lattices?













1












$begingroup$


An algebra $A$ has the congruence extension property (CEP) if for every $Ble A$ and $thetainoperatornameCon(B)$ there is a $varphiinoperatornameCon(A)$ such that $theta =varphicap(Btimes B)$. A class $K$ of algebras has the CEP if every algebra in the class has the CEP.



  • Does the class of all lattices has CEP?

  • Does the class of all groups has CEP?

  • Does the class of all distributive lattices has CEP?









share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What is the definition of $operatornameCon(A)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Santana Afton
    Mar 17 at 0:30










  • $begingroup$
    Since in groups congruences correspond to normal subgroups, what you are asking for groups would be that given a group $G$, and a subgroup $H$, if $Ntriangleleft H$ then there exists $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H=N$. It is now easy to see that this does not hold, for example by taking $G=A_5$ which is simple, but all of whose proper subgroups that are not of prime order are not simple.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Mar 17 at 0:36










  • $begingroup$
    @SantanaAfton: A congruence on $A$ is an equivalence relation on $A$ which, when viewed as a subset of $Atimes A$, is also a subalgebra of $Atimes A$ (with the induced structure); they are the objects that play the role of normal subgroups for groups and ideals for rings, to define quotients. $mathrmCon(A)$ is the collection of all congruences on $A$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Mar 17 at 0:38










  • $begingroup$
    related (possibly duplicate) question: link
    $endgroup$
    – Eran
    Mar 18 at 18:24















1












$begingroup$


An algebra $A$ has the congruence extension property (CEP) if for every $Ble A$ and $thetainoperatornameCon(B)$ there is a $varphiinoperatornameCon(A)$ such that $theta =varphicap(Btimes B)$. A class $K$ of algebras has the CEP if every algebra in the class has the CEP.



  • Does the class of all lattices has CEP?

  • Does the class of all groups has CEP?

  • Does the class of all distributive lattices has CEP?









share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What is the definition of $operatornameCon(A)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Santana Afton
    Mar 17 at 0:30










  • $begingroup$
    Since in groups congruences correspond to normal subgroups, what you are asking for groups would be that given a group $G$, and a subgroup $H$, if $Ntriangleleft H$ then there exists $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H=N$. It is now easy to see that this does not hold, for example by taking $G=A_5$ which is simple, but all of whose proper subgroups that are not of prime order are not simple.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Mar 17 at 0:36










  • $begingroup$
    @SantanaAfton: A congruence on $A$ is an equivalence relation on $A$ which, when viewed as a subset of $Atimes A$, is also a subalgebra of $Atimes A$ (with the induced structure); they are the objects that play the role of normal subgroups for groups and ideals for rings, to define quotients. $mathrmCon(A)$ is the collection of all congruences on $A$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Mar 17 at 0:38










  • $begingroup$
    related (possibly duplicate) question: link
    $endgroup$
    – Eran
    Mar 18 at 18:24













1












1








1





$begingroup$


An algebra $A$ has the congruence extension property (CEP) if for every $Ble A$ and $thetainoperatornameCon(B)$ there is a $varphiinoperatornameCon(A)$ such that $theta =varphicap(Btimes B)$. A class $K$ of algebras has the CEP if every algebra in the class has the CEP.



  • Does the class of all lattices has CEP?

  • Does the class of all groups has CEP?

  • Does the class of all distributive lattices has CEP?









share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




An algebra $A$ has the congruence extension property (CEP) if for every $Ble A$ and $thetainoperatornameCon(B)$ there is a $varphiinoperatornameCon(A)$ such that $theta =varphicap(Btimes B)$. A class $K$ of algebras has the CEP if every algebra in the class has the CEP.



  • Does the class of all lattices has CEP?

  • Does the class of all groups has CEP?

  • Does the class of all distributive lattices has CEP?






group-theory lattice-orders universal-algebra congruence-relations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 17 at 0:33









Santana Afton

2,9932629




2,9932629










asked Mar 17 at 0:05









ljubinaaljubinaa

274




274











  • $begingroup$
    What is the definition of $operatornameCon(A)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Santana Afton
    Mar 17 at 0:30










  • $begingroup$
    Since in groups congruences correspond to normal subgroups, what you are asking for groups would be that given a group $G$, and a subgroup $H$, if $Ntriangleleft H$ then there exists $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H=N$. It is now easy to see that this does not hold, for example by taking $G=A_5$ which is simple, but all of whose proper subgroups that are not of prime order are not simple.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Mar 17 at 0:36










  • $begingroup$
    @SantanaAfton: A congruence on $A$ is an equivalence relation on $A$ which, when viewed as a subset of $Atimes A$, is also a subalgebra of $Atimes A$ (with the induced structure); they are the objects that play the role of normal subgroups for groups and ideals for rings, to define quotients. $mathrmCon(A)$ is the collection of all congruences on $A$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Mar 17 at 0:38










  • $begingroup$
    related (possibly duplicate) question: link
    $endgroup$
    – Eran
    Mar 18 at 18:24
















  • $begingroup$
    What is the definition of $operatornameCon(A)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Santana Afton
    Mar 17 at 0:30










  • $begingroup$
    Since in groups congruences correspond to normal subgroups, what you are asking for groups would be that given a group $G$, and a subgroup $H$, if $Ntriangleleft H$ then there exists $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H=N$. It is now easy to see that this does not hold, for example by taking $G=A_5$ which is simple, but all of whose proper subgroups that are not of prime order are not simple.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Mar 17 at 0:36










  • $begingroup$
    @SantanaAfton: A congruence on $A$ is an equivalence relation on $A$ which, when viewed as a subset of $Atimes A$, is also a subalgebra of $Atimes A$ (with the induced structure); they are the objects that play the role of normal subgroups for groups and ideals for rings, to define quotients. $mathrmCon(A)$ is the collection of all congruences on $A$.
    $endgroup$
    – Arturo Magidin
    Mar 17 at 0:38










  • $begingroup$
    related (possibly duplicate) question: link
    $endgroup$
    – Eran
    Mar 18 at 18:24















$begingroup$
What is the definition of $operatornameCon(A)$?
$endgroup$
– Santana Afton
Mar 17 at 0:30




$begingroup$
What is the definition of $operatornameCon(A)$?
$endgroup$
– Santana Afton
Mar 17 at 0:30












$begingroup$
Since in groups congruences correspond to normal subgroups, what you are asking for groups would be that given a group $G$, and a subgroup $H$, if $Ntriangleleft H$ then there exists $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H=N$. It is now easy to see that this does not hold, for example by taking $G=A_5$ which is simple, but all of whose proper subgroups that are not of prime order are not simple.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:36




$begingroup$
Since in groups congruences correspond to normal subgroups, what you are asking for groups would be that given a group $G$, and a subgroup $H$, if $Ntriangleleft H$ then there exists $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H=N$. It is now easy to see that this does not hold, for example by taking $G=A_5$ which is simple, but all of whose proper subgroups that are not of prime order are not simple.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:36












$begingroup$
@SantanaAfton: A congruence on $A$ is an equivalence relation on $A$ which, when viewed as a subset of $Atimes A$, is also a subalgebra of $Atimes A$ (with the induced structure); they are the objects that play the role of normal subgroups for groups and ideals for rings, to define quotients. $mathrmCon(A)$ is the collection of all congruences on $A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:38




$begingroup$
@SantanaAfton: A congruence on $A$ is an equivalence relation on $A$ which, when viewed as a subset of $Atimes A$, is also a subalgebra of $Atimes A$ (with the induced structure); they are the objects that play the role of normal subgroups for groups and ideals for rings, to define quotients. $mathrmCon(A)$ is the collection of all congruences on $A$.
$endgroup$
– Arturo Magidin
Mar 17 at 0:38












$begingroup$
related (possibly duplicate) question: link
$endgroup$
– Eran
Mar 18 at 18:24




$begingroup$
related (possibly duplicate) question: link
$endgroup$
– Eran
Mar 18 at 18:24










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

The variety of all groups does not have the property. Congruences correspond to normal subgroups, so you are essentially asking whether if $Hleq G$, and $Ntriangleleft H$, does there always exist an $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H= N$. This does not hold; for example, if $G=A_5$, $H=A_4$, and $N$ is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup of $A_4$, then you cannot find any appropriate $M$.



The variety of all latices does not have the property either. Let $L$ be the nondistributive lattice $M_3$, with elements $0$, $1$, $x$, $y$, and $z$ (where the join of any distinct elements of $x,y,z$ is $1$, and the meet is $0$). Let $M$ be the sublattice $0,x,1$. Then let $Phi$ be the congruence in $M$ that identifies $0$ and $x$.



Let $Psi$ be a congruence on $L$ that identifies $0$ and $x$. Then it must identify $0vee y=y$ with $xvee y=1$; similarly, it must identify $0vee z = z$ with $xvee z = 1$. Thus, $y$, $z$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $zwedge 1 = z$ must be identified with $zwedge y = 0$, so all of $0$, $z$, $y$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $x$ is identified with $1$ as well, so that $Phi$ is a proper subcongruence of $Psi|_M$. Thus, $M_3$ does not have the congruence extension property.



In fact, I believe (but don’t have access to my textbooks right now) that the Congruence Extension Property precisely characterizes the distributive lattices among all latices (see for instance the opening line of this paper ) which would give an affirmative answer to your final question.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150999%2fcep-for-distributive-lattices-and-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    The variety of all groups does not have the property. Congruences correspond to normal subgroups, so you are essentially asking whether if $Hleq G$, and $Ntriangleleft H$, does there always exist an $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H= N$. This does not hold; for example, if $G=A_5$, $H=A_4$, and $N$ is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup of $A_4$, then you cannot find any appropriate $M$.



    The variety of all latices does not have the property either. Let $L$ be the nondistributive lattice $M_3$, with elements $0$, $1$, $x$, $y$, and $z$ (where the join of any distinct elements of $x,y,z$ is $1$, and the meet is $0$). Let $M$ be the sublattice $0,x,1$. Then let $Phi$ be the congruence in $M$ that identifies $0$ and $x$.



    Let $Psi$ be a congruence on $L$ that identifies $0$ and $x$. Then it must identify $0vee y=y$ with $xvee y=1$; similarly, it must identify $0vee z = z$ with $xvee z = 1$. Thus, $y$, $z$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $zwedge 1 = z$ must be identified with $zwedge y = 0$, so all of $0$, $z$, $y$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $x$ is identified with $1$ as well, so that $Phi$ is a proper subcongruence of $Psi|_M$. Thus, $M_3$ does not have the congruence extension property.



    In fact, I believe (but don’t have access to my textbooks right now) that the Congruence Extension Property precisely characterizes the distributive lattices among all latices (see for instance the opening line of this paper ) which would give an affirmative answer to your final question.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      3












      $begingroup$

      The variety of all groups does not have the property. Congruences correspond to normal subgroups, so you are essentially asking whether if $Hleq G$, and $Ntriangleleft H$, does there always exist an $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H= N$. This does not hold; for example, if $G=A_5$, $H=A_4$, and $N$ is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup of $A_4$, then you cannot find any appropriate $M$.



      The variety of all latices does not have the property either. Let $L$ be the nondistributive lattice $M_3$, with elements $0$, $1$, $x$, $y$, and $z$ (where the join of any distinct elements of $x,y,z$ is $1$, and the meet is $0$). Let $M$ be the sublattice $0,x,1$. Then let $Phi$ be the congruence in $M$ that identifies $0$ and $x$.



      Let $Psi$ be a congruence on $L$ that identifies $0$ and $x$. Then it must identify $0vee y=y$ with $xvee y=1$; similarly, it must identify $0vee z = z$ with $xvee z = 1$. Thus, $y$, $z$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $zwedge 1 = z$ must be identified with $zwedge y = 0$, so all of $0$, $z$, $y$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $x$ is identified with $1$ as well, so that $Phi$ is a proper subcongruence of $Psi|_M$. Thus, $M_3$ does not have the congruence extension property.



      In fact, I believe (but don’t have access to my textbooks right now) that the Congruence Extension Property precisely characterizes the distributive lattices among all latices (see for instance the opening line of this paper ) which would give an affirmative answer to your final question.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        The variety of all groups does not have the property. Congruences correspond to normal subgroups, so you are essentially asking whether if $Hleq G$, and $Ntriangleleft H$, does there always exist an $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H= N$. This does not hold; for example, if $G=A_5$, $H=A_4$, and $N$ is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup of $A_4$, then you cannot find any appropriate $M$.



        The variety of all latices does not have the property either. Let $L$ be the nondistributive lattice $M_3$, with elements $0$, $1$, $x$, $y$, and $z$ (where the join of any distinct elements of $x,y,z$ is $1$, and the meet is $0$). Let $M$ be the sublattice $0,x,1$. Then let $Phi$ be the congruence in $M$ that identifies $0$ and $x$.



        Let $Psi$ be a congruence on $L$ that identifies $0$ and $x$. Then it must identify $0vee y=y$ with $xvee y=1$; similarly, it must identify $0vee z = z$ with $xvee z = 1$. Thus, $y$, $z$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $zwedge 1 = z$ must be identified with $zwedge y = 0$, so all of $0$, $z$, $y$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $x$ is identified with $1$ as well, so that $Phi$ is a proper subcongruence of $Psi|_M$. Thus, $M_3$ does not have the congruence extension property.



        In fact, I believe (but don’t have access to my textbooks right now) that the Congruence Extension Property precisely characterizes the distributive lattices among all latices (see for instance the opening line of this paper ) which would give an affirmative answer to your final question.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The variety of all groups does not have the property. Congruences correspond to normal subgroups, so you are essentially asking whether if $Hleq G$, and $Ntriangleleft H$, does there always exist an $Mtriangleleft G$ such that $Mcap H= N$. This does not hold; for example, if $G=A_5$, $H=A_4$, and $N$ is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup of $A_4$, then you cannot find any appropriate $M$.



        The variety of all latices does not have the property either. Let $L$ be the nondistributive lattice $M_3$, with elements $0$, $1$, $x$, $y$, and $z$ (where the join of any distinct elements of $x,y,z$ is $1$, and the meet is $0$). Let $M$ be the sublattice $0,x,1$. Then let $Phi$ be the congruence in $M$ that identifies $0$ and $x$.



        Let $Psi$ be a congruence on $L$ that identifies $0$ and $x$. Then it must identify $0vee y=y$ with $xvee y=1$; similarly, it must identify $0vee z = z$ with $xvee z = 1$. Thus, $y$, $z$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $zwedge 1 = z$ must be identified with $zwedge y = 0$, so all of $0$, $z$, $y$, and $1$ are identified in $Psi$. That means that $x$ is identified with $1$ as well, so that $Phi$ is a proper subcongruence of $Psi|_M$. Thus, $M_3$ does not have the congruence extension property.



        In fact, I believe (but don’t have access to my textbooks right now) that the Congruence Extension Property precisely characterizes the distributive lattices among all latices (see for instance the opening line of this paper ) which would give an affirmative answer to your final question.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 17 at 7:27

























        answered Mar 17 at 1:39









        Arturo MagidinArturo Magidin

        265k34590920




        265k34590920



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150999%2fcep-for-distributive-lattices-and-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye