Big-$O$ verification [discrete mathematics]Sets problem with upper boundsDiscrete Math - Logic - Implication ProblemLimit inferior and superior proof questionsDiscrete Mathematics - LogicExtend an acyclic relation to an orderingNon-homogenous linear recurrence relation reasonable TRIAL solution?Proof by Cases [discrete mathematics]Direct proof of Universal Set [discrete mathematics]Draw a pentagon with any 2 angle sums being less than $216^o$Indirect Proof [discrete mathematics]

Why does this part of the Space Shuttle launch pad seem to be floating in air?

Simulating a probability of 1 of 2^N with less than N random bits

Is a naturally all "male" species possible?

What to do when my ideas aren't chosen, when I strongly disagree with the chosen solution?

Would it be legal for a US State to ban exports of a natural resource?

Simple image editor tool to draw a simple box/rectangle in an existing image

How to check participants in at events?

Can the harmonic series explain the origin of the major scale?

Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?

word describing multiple paths to the same abstract outcome

Giant Toughroad SLR 2 for 200 miles in two days, will it make it?

Identify a stage play about a VR experience in which participants are encouraged to simulate performing horrific activities

Greatest common substring

How do ultrasonic sensors differentiate between transmitted and received signals?

node command while defining a coordinate in TikZ

How to prevent YouTube from showing already watched videos?

Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th century?

How to deal with or prevent idle in the test team?

Is infinity mathematically observable?

Pronouncing Homer as in modern Greek

Reply ‘no position’ while the job posting is still there (‘HiWi’ position in Germany)

What will be the benefits of Brexit?

Are taller landing gear bad for aircraft, particulary large airliners?

Is it legal to discriminate due to the medicine used to treat a medical condition?



Big-$O$ verification [discrete mathematics]


Sets problem with upper boundsDiscrete Math - Logic - Implication ProblemLimit inferior and superior proof questionsDiscrete Mathematics - LogicExtend an acyclic relation to an orderingNon-homogenous linear recurrence relation reasonable TRIAL solution?Proof by Cases [discrete mathematics]Direct proof of Universal Set [discrete mathematics]Draw a pentagon with any 2 angle sums being less than $216^o$Indirect Proof [discrete mathematics]













-1












$begingroup$


I've come across challenge proof question in my discrete mathematics textbook that I'm trying to solve for practice but unfortunately it does not have a solution. Any help with a reasonable explanation or solution so that I can understand where to start and verify my work would be greatly appreciated:




Suppose that $f$, $g$ and $h$ are all functions from $mathbfN$ into
$mathbfR^+$. Prove that if $f + g notin O(h)$, then either $f
> notin O(h)$
, or $g notin O(h)$ (or both).



Recall that $f in O(h)$ if and only if $exists c in mathbfR^+,
> exists n_0 in mathbfN, forall n in mathbfN, n ge n_0
> implies f(n) le ch(n)$
. We define $f + g$ to be the function such
that $(f + g)(n) = f(n) + g(n)$ for every element $n$ of $mathbfN$.




Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    -1












    $begingroup$


    I've come across challenge proof question in my discrete mathematics textbook that I'm trying to solve for practice but unfortunately it does not have a solution. Any help with a reasonable explanation or solution so that I can understand where to start and verify my work would be greatly appreciated:




    Suppose that $f$, $g$ and $h$ are all functions from $mathbfN$ into
    $mathbfR^+$. Prove that if $f + g notin O(h)$, then either $f
    > notin O(h)$
    , or $g notin O(h)$ (or both).



    Recall that $f in O(h)$ if and only if $exists c in mathbfR^+,
    > exists n_0 in mathbfN, forall n in mathbfN, n ge n_0
    > implies f(n) le ch(n)$
    . We define $f + g$ to be the function such
    that $(f + g)(n) = f(n) + g(n)$ for every element $n$ of $mathbfN$.




    Thank you!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      -1












      -1








      -1





      $begingroup$


      I've come across challenge proof question in my discrete mathematics textbook that I'm trying to solve for practice but unfortunately it does not have a solution. Any help with a reasonable explanation or solution so that I can understand where to start and verify my work would be greatly appreciated:




      Suppose that $f$, $g$ and $h$ are all functions from $mathbfN$ into
      $mathbfR^+$. Prove that if $f + g notin O(h)$, then either $f
      > notin O(h)$
      , or $g notin O(h)$ (or both).



      Recall that $f in O(h)$ if and only if $exists c in mathbfR^+,
      > exists n_0 in mathbfN, forall n in mathbfN, n ge n_0
      > implies f(n) le ch(n)$
      . We define $f + g$ to be the function such
      that $(f + g)(n) = f(n) + g(n)$ for every element $n$ of $mathbfN$.




      Thank you!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I've come across challenge proof question in my discrete mathematics textbook that I'm trying to solve for practice but unfortunately it does not have a solution. Any help with a reasonable explanation or solution so that I can understand where to start and verify my work would be greatly appreciated:




      Suppose that $f$, $g$ and $h$ are all functions from $mathbfN$ into
      $mathbfR^+$. Prove that if $f + g notin O(h)$, then either $f
      > notin O(h)$
      , or $g notin O(h)$ (or both).



      Recall that $f in O(h)$ if and only if $exists c in mathbfR^+,
      > exists n_0 in mathbfN, forall n in mathbfN, n ge n_0
      > implies f(n) le ch(n)$
      . We define $f + g$ to be the function such
      that $(f + g)(n) = f(n) + g(n)$ for every element $n$ of $mathbfN$.




      Thank you!







      discrete-mathematics proof-verification proof-writing proof-explanation recreational-mathematics






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 16 at 20:44









      Joe BidenJoe Biden

      25




      25




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          $f+g notin O(h)$
          means that,
          for any $c > 0$,
          there is a value of $x$
          such that
          $f(x)+g(x) > ch(x)$.



          $f in O(h)$
          means that,
          for all large enough $x$,
          there is a $c > 0$
          such that
          $f(x) < ch(x)$
          and similarly for $g$.



          If both
          $f in O(h)$ and
          $g in O(h)$
          there are
          $c_f$ and $c_g$
          such that,
          for all large enough $x$,
          $f(x) < c_fh(x)$
          and
          $g(x) < c_gh(x)$.



          Therefore,
          for all large enough $x$,
          $f(x)+g(x)
          lt (c_f+c_g)h(x)$
          ,
          so that
          $f+g in O(h)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150825%2fbig-o-verification-discrete-mathematics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            $f+g notin O(h)$
            means that,
            for any $c > 0$,
            there is a value of $x$
            such that
            $f(x)+g(x) > ch(x)$.



            $f in O(h)$
            means that,
            for all large enough $x$,
            there is a $c > 0$
            such that
            $f(x) < ch(x)$
            and similarly for $g$.



            If both
            $f in O(h)$ and
            $g in O(h)$
            there are
            $c_f$ and $c_g$
            such that,
            for all large enough $x$,
            $f(x) < c_fh(x)$
            and
            $g(x) < c_gh(x)$.



            Therefore,
            for all large enough $x$,
            $f(x)+g(x)
            lt (c_f+c_g)h(x)$
            ,
            so that
            $f+g in O(h)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              $f+g notin O(h)$
              means that,
              for any $c > 0$,
              there is a value of $x$
              such that
              $f(x)+g(x) > ch(x)$.



              $f in O(h)$
              means that,
              for all large enough $x$,
              there is a $c > 0$
              such that
              $f(x) < ch(x)$
              and similarly for $g$.



              If both
              $f in O(h)$ and
              $g in O(h)$
              there are
              $c_f$ and $c_g$
              such that,
              for all large enough $x$,
              $f(x) < c_fh(x)$
              and
              $g(x) < c_gh(x)$.



              Therefore,
              for all large enough $x$,
              $f(x)+g(x)
              lt (c_f+c_g)h(x)$
              ,
              so that
              $f+g in O(h)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                $f+g notin O(h)$
                means that,
                for any $c > 0$,
                there is a value of $x$
                such that
                $f(x)+g(x) > ch(x)$.



                $f in O(h)$
                means that,
                for all large enough $x$,
                there is a $c > 0$
                such that
                $f(x) < ch(x)$
                and similarly for $g$.



                If both
                $f in O(h)$ and
                $g in O(h)$
                there are
                $c_f$ and $c_g$
                such that,
                for all large enough $x$,
                $f(x) < c_fh(x)$
                and
                $g(x) < c_gh(x)$.



                Therefore,
                for all large enough $x$,
                $f(x)+g(x)
                lt (c_f+c_g)h(x)$
                ,
                so that
                $f+g in O(h)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                $f+g notin O(h)$
                means that,
                for any $c > 0$,
                there is a value of $x$
                such that
                $f(x)+g(x) > ch(x)$.



                $f in O(h)$
                means that,
                for all large enough $x$,
                there is a $c > 0$
                such that
                $f(x) < ch(x)$
                and similarly for $g$.



                If both
                $f in O(h)$ and
                $g in O(h)$
                there are
                $c_f$ and $c_g$
                such that,
                for all large enough $x$,
                $f(x) < c_fh(x)$
                and
                $g(x) < c_gh(x)$.



                Therefore,
                for all large enough $x$,
                $f(x)+g(x)
                lt (c_f+c_g)h(x)$
                ,
                so that
                $f+g in O(h)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 16 at 21:13









                marty cohenmarty cohen

                74.6k549129




                74.6k549129



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150825%2fbig-o-verification-discrete-mathematics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

                    John Burke, 9th Earl of Clanricarde References Navigation menuA General and heraldic dictionary of the peerage and baronetage of the British EmpireLeigh Rayment's Peerage Pages

                    Football at the 1986 Brunei Merdeka Games Contents Teams Group stage Knockout stage References Navigation menu"Brunei Merdeka Games 1986".