Big-$O$ verification [discrete mathematics]Sets problem with upper boundsDiscrete Math - Logic - Implication ProblemLimit inferior and superior proof questionsDiscrete Mathematics - LogicExtend an acyclic relation to an orderingNon-homogenous linear recurrence relation reasonable TRIAL solution?Proof by Cases [discrete mathematics]Direct proof of Universal Set [discrete mathematics]Draw a pentagon with any 2 angle sums being less than $216^o$Indirect Proof [discrete mathematics]

Why does this part of the Space Shuttle launch pad seem to be floating in air?

Simulating a probability of 1 of 2^N with less than N random bits

Is a naturally all "male" species possible?

What to do when my ideas aren't chosen, when I strongly disagree with the chosen solution?

Would it be legal for a US State to ban exports of a natural resource?

Simple image editor tool to draw a simple box/rectangle in an existing image

How to check participants in at events?

Can the harmonic series explain the origin of the major scale?

Is there a good way to store credentials outside of a password manager?

word describing multiple paths to the same abstract outcome

Giant Toughroad SLR 2 for 200 miles in two days, will it make it?

Identify a stage play about a VR experience in which participants are encouraged to simulate performing horrific activities

Greatest common substring

How do ultrasonic sensors differentiate between transmitted and received signals?

node command while defining a coordinate in TikZ

How to prevent YouTube from showing already watched videos?

Could solar power be utilized and substitute coal in the 19th century?

How to deal with or prevent idle in the test team?

Is infinity mathematically observable?

Pronouncing Homer as in modern Greek

Reply ‘no position’ while the job posting is still there (‘HiWi’ position in Germany)

What will be the benefits of Brexit?

Are taller landing gear bad for aircraft, particulary large airliners?

Is it legal to discriminate due to the medicine used to treat a medical condition?



Big-$O$ verification [discrete mathematics]


Sets problem with upper boundsDiscrete Math - Logic - Implication ProblemLimit inferior and superior proof questionsDiscrete Mathematics - LogicExtend an acyclic relation to an orderingNon-homogenous linear recurrence relation reasonable TRIAL solution?Proof by Cases [discrete mathematics]Direct proof of Universal Set [discrete mathematics]Draw a pentagon with any 2 angle sums being less than $216^o$Indirect Proof [discrete mathematics]













-1












$begingroup$


I've come across challenge proof question in my discrete mathematics textbook that I'm trying to solve for practice but unfortunately it does not have a solution. Any help with a reasonable explanation or solution so that I can understand where to start and verify my work would be greatly appreciated:




Suppose that $f$, $g$ and $h$ are all functions from $mathbfN$ into
$mathbfR^+$. Prove that if $f + g notin O(h)$, then either $f
> notin O(h)$
, or $g notin O(h)$ (or both).



Recall that $f in O(h)$ if and only if $exists c in mathbfR^+,
> exists n_0 in mathbfN, forall n in mathbfN, n ge n_0
> implies f(n) le ch(n)$
. We define $f + g$ to be the function such
that $(f + g)(n) = f(n) + g(n)$ for every element $n$ of $mathbfN$.




Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    -1












    $begingroup$


    I've come across challenge proof question in my discrete mathematics textbook that I'm trying to solve for practice but unfortunately it does not have a solution. Any help with a reasonable explanation or solution so that I can understand where to start and verify my work would be greatly appreciated:




    Suppose that $f$, $g$ and $h$ are all functions from $mathbfN$ into
    $mathbfR^+$. Prove that if $f + g notin O(h)$, then either $f
    > notin O(h)$
    , or $g notin O(h)$ (or both).



    Recall that $f in O(h)$ if and only if $exists c in mathbfR^+,
    > exists n_0 in mathbfN, forall n in mathbfN, n ge n_0
    > implies f(n) le ch(n)$
    . We define $f + g$ to be the function such
    that $(f + g)(n) = f(n) + g(n)$ for every element $n$ of $mathbfN$.




    Thank you!










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      -1












      -1








      -1





      $begingroup$


      I've come across challenge proof question in my discrete mathematics textbook that I'm trying to solve for practice but unfortunately it does not have a solution. Any help with a reasonable explanation or solution so that I can understand where to start and verify my work would be greatly appreciated:




      Suppose that $f$, $g$ and $h$ are all functions from $mathbfN$ into
      $mathbfR^+$. Prove that if $f + g notin O(h)$, then either $f
      > notin O(h)$
      , or $g notin O(h)$ (or both).



      Recall that $f in O(h)$ if and only if $exists c in mathbfR^+,
      > exists n_0 in mathbfN, forall n in mathbfN, n ge n_0
      > implies f(n) le ch(n)$
      . We define $f + g$ to be the function such
      that $(f + g)(n) = f(n) + g(n)$ for every element $n$ of $mathbfN$.




      Thank you!










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I've come across challenge proof question in my discrete mathematics textbook that I'm trying to solve for practice but unfortunately it does not have a solution. Any help with a reasonable explanation or solution so that I can understand where to start and verify my work would be greatly appreciated:




      Suppose that $f$, $g$ and $h$ are all functions from $mathbfN$ into
      $mathbfR^+$. Prove that if $f + g notin O(h)$, then either $f
      > notin O(h)$
      , or $g notin O(h)$ (or both).



      Recall that $f in O(h)$ if and only if $exists c in mathbfR^+,
      > exists n_0 in mathbfN, forall n in mathbfN, n ge n_0
      > implies f(n) le ch(n)$
      . We define $f + g$ to be the function such
      that $(f + g)(n) = f(n) + g(n)$ for every element $n$ of $mathbfN$.




      Thank you!







      discrete-mathematics proof-verification proof-writing proof-explanation recreational-mathematics






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 16 at 20:44









      Joe BidenJoe Biden

      25




      25




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          $f+g notin O(h)$
          means that,
          for any $c > 0$,
          there is a value of $x$
          such that
          $f(x)+g(x) > ch(x)$.



          $f in O(h)$
          means that,
          for all large enough $x$,
          there is a $c > 0$
          such that
          $f(x) < ch(x)$
          and similarly for $g$.



          If both
          $f in O(h)$ and
          $g in O(h)$
          there are
          $c_f$ and $c_g$
          such that,
          for all large enough $x$,
          $f(x) < c_fh(x)$
          and
          $g(x) < c_gh(x)$.



          Therefore,
          for all large enough $x$,
          $f(x)+g(x)
          lt (c_f+c_g)h(x)$
          ,
          so that
          $f+g in O(h)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150825%2fbig-o-verification-discrete-mathematics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            $f+g notin O(h)$
            means that,
            for any $c > 0$,
            there is a value of $x$
            such that
            $f(x)+g(x) > ch(x)$.



            $f in O(h)$
            means that,
            for all large enough $x$,
            there is a $c > 0$
            such that
            $f(x) < ch(x)$
            and similarly for $g$.



            If both
            $f in O(h)$ and
            $g in O(h)$
            there are
            $c_f$ and $c_g$
            such that,
            for all large enough $x$,
            $f(x) < c_fh(x)$
            and
            $g(x) < c_gh(x)$.



            Therefore,
            for all large enough $x$,
            $f(x)+g(x)
            lt (c_f+c_g)h(x)$
            ,
            so that
            $f+g in O(h)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              $f+g notin O(h)$
              means that,
              for any $c > 0$,
              there is a value of $x$
              such that
              $f(x)+g(x) > ch(x)$.



              $f in O(h)$
              means that,
              for all large enough $x$,
              there is a $c > 0$
              such that
              $f(x) < ch(x)$
              and similarly for $g$.



              If both
              $f in O(h)$ and
              $g in O(h)$
              there are
              $c_f$ and $c_g$
              such that,
              for all large enough $x$,
              $f(x) < c_fh(x)$
              and
              $g(x) < c_gh(x)$.



              Therefore,
              for all large enough $x$,
              $f(x)+g(x)
              lt (c_f+c_g)h(x)$
              ,
              so that
              $f+g in O(h)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                $f+g notin O(h)$
                means that,
                for any $c > 0$,
                there is a value of $x$
                such that
                $f(x)+g(x) > ch(x)$.



                $f in O(h)$
                means that,
                for all large enough $x$,
                there is a $c > 0$
                such that
                $f(x) < ch(x)$
                and similarly for $g$.



                If both
                $f in O(h)$ and
                $g in O(h)$
                there are
                $c_f$ and $c_g$
                such that,
                for all large enough $x$,
                $f(x) < c_fh(x)$
                and
                $g(x) < c_gh(x)$.



                Therefore,
                for all large enough $x$,
                $f(x)+g(x)
                lt (c_f+c_g)h(x)$
                ,
                so that
                $f+g in O(h)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                $f+g notin O(h)$
                means that,
                for any $c > 0$,
                there is a value of $x$
                such that
                $f(x)+g(x) > ch(x)$.



                $f in O(h)$
                means that,
                for all large enough $x$,
                there is a $c > 0$
                such that
                $f(x) < ch(x)$
                and similarly for $g$.



                If both
                $f in O(h)$ and
                $g in O(h)$
                there are
                $c_f$ and $c_g$
                such that,
                for all large enough $x$,
                $f(x) < c_fh(x)$
                and
                $g(x) < c_gh(x)$.



                Therefore,
                for all large enough $x$,
                $f(x)+g(x)
                lt (c_f+c_g)h(x)$
                ,
                so that
                $f+g in O(h)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 16 at 21:13









                marty cohenmarty cohen

                74.6k549129




                74.6k549129



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150825%2fbig-o-verification-discrete-mathematics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

                    Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

                    Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers