Relative Entropy and the Wasserstein distanceWasserstein distance from a Dirac measureThe Wasserstein distance on $mathbbR$Wasserstein distances metrize weak convergenceUnderstanding information entropyCompleteness of Wasserstein spaceAn intriguing duality gap for Wasserstein distance for Gaussian distributionsWasserstein Distance with TranslationsWasserstein distance between hyperplane and cubeWasserstein attains its infimumWasserstein distance of two flat triangles

Is exact Kanji stroke length important?

What was required to accept "troll"?

Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?

Teaching indefinite integrals that require special-casing

A known event to a history junkie

Stereotypical names

In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales were already rare?

Meta programming: Declare a new struct on the fly

Simple recursive Sudoku solver

Partial sums of primes

Why isn't KTEX's runway designation 10/28 instead of 9/27?

The One-Electron Universe postulate is true - what simple change can I make to change the whole universe?

Is a naturally all "male" species possible?

Perfect riffle shuffles

What do you call the infoboxes with text and sometimes images on the side of a page we find in textbooks?

Are taller landing gear bad for aircraft, particulary large airliners?

How to deal with or prevent idle in the test team?

Organic chemistry Iodoform Reaction

Greatest common substring

What will be the benefits of Brexit?

How do ultrasonic sensors differentiate between transmitted and received signals?

"lassen" in meaning "sich fassen"

Are Warlocks Arcane or Divine?

Adding empty element to declared container without declaring type of element



Relative Entropy and the Wasserstein distance


Wasserstein distance from a Dirac measureThe Wasserstein distance on $mathbbR$Wasserstein distances metrize weak convergenceUnderstanding information entropyCompleteness of Wasserstein spaceAn intriguing duality gap for Wasserstein distance for Gaussian distributionsWasserstein Distance with TranslationsWasserstein distance between hyperplane and cubeWasserstein attains its infimumWasserstein distance of two flat triangles













2












$begingroup$


Can anyone give an informative example of two distributions which have a low Wasserstein distance but high relative entropy (or the other way around)? I find the Wasserstein defined (for some $p$) as



$$ W_p(mu,nu)=(inf_piinPi(mu,nu)int d^p(x,y)pi(dx,dy))^1/p $$



an intuitive, reasonable way to calculate the distance (or displacement) between two probability measures. However im struggling to see what relative entropy really tells us. I have seen from Sanov's theorem that it can be used to control the exponential rate of decay of the probability of a rare event, however I still haven't got an intuitive feel for how it works and would really appreciate a concrete example so I can compare it against the Wasserstein. I have heard that relative entropy controls the fluctuation of one distribution w.r.t another however haven't yet quite understood what this means.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Can anyone give an informative example of two distributions which have a low Wasserstein distance but high relative entropy (or the other way around)? I find the Wasserstein defined (for some $p$) as



    $$ W_p(mu,nu)=(inf_piinPi(mu,nu)int d^p(x,y)pi(dx,dy))^1/p $$



    an intuitive, reasonable way to calculate the distance (or displacement) between two probability measures. However im struggling to see what relative entropy really tells us. I have seen from Sanov's theorem that it can be used to control the exponential rate of decay of the probability of a rare event, however I still haven't got an intuitive feel for how it works and would really appreciate a concrete example so I can compare it against the Wasserstein. I have heard that relative entropy controls the fluctuation of one distribution w.r.t another however haven't yet quite understood what this means.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Can anyone give an informative example of two distributions which have a low Wasserstein distance but high relative entropy (or the other way around)? I find the Wasserstein defined (for some $p$) as



      $$ W_p(mu,nu)=(inf_piinPi(mu,nu)int d^p(x,y)pi(dx,dy))^1/p $$



      an intuitive, reasonable way to calculate the distance (or displacement) between two probability measures. However im struggling to see what relative entropy really tells us. I have seen from Sanov's theorem that it can be used to control the exponential rate of decay of the probability of a rare event, however I still haven't got an intuitive feel for how it works and would really appreciate a concrete example so I can compare it against the Wasserstein. I have heard that relative entropy controls the fluctuation of one distribution w.r.t another however haven't yet quite understood what this means.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Can anyone give an informative example of two distributions which have a low Wasserstein distance but high relative entropy (or the other way around)? I find the Wasserstein defined (for some $p$) as



      $$ W_p(mu,nu)=(inf_piinPi(mu,nu)int d^p(x,y)pi(dx,dy))^1/p $$



      an intuitive, reasonable way to calculate the distance (or displacement) between two probability measures. However im struggling to see what relative entropy really tells us. I have seen from Sanov's theorem that it can be used to control the exponential rate of decay of the probability of a rare event, however I still haven't got an intuitive feel for how it works and would really appreciate a concrete example so I can compare it against the Wasserstein. I have heard that relative entropy controls the fluctuation of one distribution w.r.t another however haven't yet quite understood what this means.







      probability-theory measure-theory concentration-of-measure optimal-transport






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 16 at 21:49









      MontyMonty

      36113




      36113




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          For an example, look at the point masses $delta_0$ and $delta_h$ supported at $0$ and $h$, respectively. The Wasserstein distance between these is $O(h)$, which is small if $h$ is small. But for $hne0$ the relative entropy is infinitely large, as the two measures are mutually singular.



          For an example the other way around, let $f$ be the density of a $U[0,N]$ rv, and let $g(x)=(1-epsilon)f(x)$ for $xin[0,N/2]$ and $g(x)=(1+epsilon)f(x)$ otherwise. The Wasserstein distance is something like $O(Nepsilon)$ (because we have to transfer like $epsilon$ of the mass over distance $N/2$, but the relative entropy is something like $O(epsilon)$ because $log f(x)/g(x) = O(epsilon)$. By proper choice of $epsilon$, we can make the Wasserstein distance big but the relative entropy small.



          The intuitive picture I have in mind, is that when one looks at the superimposed graphs of the densities of the two measures (pretending that they have densities) is that the the relative entropy measures how much they differ in a vertical sense only, but the Wasserstein metric allows for sideways nudgings of the two graphs.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150894%2frelative-entropy-and-the-wasserstein-distance%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            For an example, look at the point masses $delta_0$ and $delta_h$ supported at $0$ and $h$, respectively. The Wasserstein distance between these is $O(h)$, which is small if $h$ is small. But for $hne0$ the relative entropy is infinitely large, as the two measures are mutually singular.



            For an example the other way around, let $f$ be the density of a $U[0,N]$ rv, and let $g(x)=(1-epsilon)f(x)$ for $xin[0,N/2]$ and $g(x)=(1+epsilon)f(x)$ otherwise. The Wasserstein distance is something like $O(Nepsilon)$ (because we have to transfer like $epsilon$ of the mass over distance $N/2$, but the relative entropy is something like $O(epsilon)$ because $log f(x)/g(x) = O(epsilon)$. By proper choice of $epsilon$, we can make the Wasserstein distance big but the relative entropy small.



            The intuitive picture I have in mind, is that when one looks at the superimposed graphs of the densities of the two measures (pretending that they have densities) is that the the relative entropy measures how much they differ in a vertical sense only, but the Wasserstein metric allows for sideways nudgings of the two graphs.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              For an example, look at the point masses $delta_0$ and $delta_h$ supported at $0$ and $h$, respectively. The Wasserstein distance between these is $O(h)$, which is small if $h$ is small. But for $hne0$ the relative entropy is infinitely large, as the two measures are mutually singular.



              For an example the other way around, let $f$ be the density of a $U[0,N]$ rv, and let $g(x)=(1-epsilon)f(x)$ for $xin[0,N/2]$ and $g(x)=(1+epsilon)f(x)$ otherwise. The Wasserstein distance is something like $O(Nepsilon)$ (because we have to transfer like $epsilon$ of the mass over distance $N/2$, but the relative entropy is something like $O(epsilon)$ because $log f(x)/g(x) = O(epsilon)$. By proper choice of $epsilon$, we can make the Wasserstein distance big but the relative entropy small.



              The intuitive picture I have in mind, is that when one looks at the superimposed graphs of the densities of the two measures (pretending that they have densities) is that the the relative entropy measures how much they differ in a vertical sense only, but the Wasserstein metric allows for sideways nudgings of the two graphs.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                For an example, look at the point masses $delta_0$ and $delta_h$ supported at $0$ and $h$, respectively. The Wasserstein distance between these is $O(h)$, which is small if $h$ is small. But for $hne0$ the relative entropy is infinitely large, as the two measures are mutually singular.



                For an example the other way around, let $f$ be the density of a $U[0,N]$ rv, and let $g(x)=(1-epsilon)f(x)$ for $xin[0,N/2]$ and $g(x)=(1+epsilon)f(x)$ otherwise. The Wasserstein distance is something like $O(Nepsilon)$ (because we have to transfer like $epsilon$ of the mass over distance $N/2$, but the relative entropy is something like $O(epsilon)$ because $log f(x)/g(x) = O(epsilon)$. By proper choice of $epsilon$, we can make the Wasserstein distance big but the relative entropy small.



                The intuitive picture I have in mind, is that when one looks at the superimposed graphs of the densities of the two measures (pretending that they have densities) is that the the relative entropy measures how much they differ in a vertical sense only, but the Wasserstein metric allows for sideways nudgings of the two graphs.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                For an example, look at the point masses $delta_0$ and $delta_h$ supported at $0$ and $h$, respectively. The Wasserstein distance between these is $O(h)$, which is small if $h$ is small. But for $hne0$ the relative entropy is infinitely large, as the two measures are mutually singular.



                For an example the other way around, let $f$ be the density of a $U[0,N]$ rv, and let $g(x)=(1-epsilon)f(x)$ for $xin[0,N/2]$ and $g(x)=(1+epsilon)f(x)$ otherwise. The Wasserstein distance is something like $O(Nepsilon)$ (because we have to transfer like $epsilon$ of the mass over distance $N/2$, but the relative entropy is something like $O(epsilon)$ because $log f(x)/g(x) = O(epsilon)$. By proper choice of $epsilon$, we can make the Wasserstein distance big but the relative entropy small.



                The intuitive picture I have in mind, is that when one looks at the superimposed graphs of the densities of the two measures (pretending that they have densities) is that the the relative entropy measures how much they differ in a vertical sense only, but the Wasserstein metric allows for sideways nudgings of the two graphs.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Mar 17 at 0:37









                Ankitp

                21029




                21029










                answered Mar 16 at 22:17









                kimchi loverkimchi lover

                11.5k31229




                11.5k31229



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3150894%2frelative-entropy-and-the-wasserstein-distance%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                    random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                    Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye