Positive scalar curvature in dimension 4Does the curvature determine the metric?why positive scalar curvature manifoldsCorollary to Preissman's theoremWhen can a manifold be curvature free?Positive Ricci curvature vs sectional curvatureTrying to Understand Scalar Curvature – Send Help!Does the proof of Yamabe problem gives a method for finding metric of constant scalar curvature?Does positive Yamabe invariant imply every metric in that conformal class has positive scalar curvature?Positive scalar curvature metric on $S^4$Compact totally geodesic submanifolds in manifold with positive sectional curvature

In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales were already rare?

Can I rely on these GitHub repository files?

Visiting the UK as unmarried couple

Is exact Kanji stroke length important?

The One-Electron Universe postulate is true - what simple change can I make to change the whole universe?

Blender - show edges angles “direction”

What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?

Can I create an upright 7-foot × 5-foot wall with the Minor Illusion spell?

How can a jailer prevent the Forge Cleric's Artisan's Blessing from being used?

Superhero words!

Can the harmonic series explain the origin of the major scale?

What should I use for Mishna study?

How to prevent YouTube from showing already watched videos?

A known event to a history junkie

Indicating multiple different modes of speech (fantasy language or telepathy)

Can the electrostatic force be infinite in magnitude?

How can I raise concerns with a new DM about XP splitting?

Perfect riffle shuffles

Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?

Can a malicious addon access internet history and such in chrome/firefox?

Is it okay / does it make sense for another player to join a running game of Munchkin?

"lassen" in meaning "sich fassen"

node command while defining a coordinate in TikZ

Can a Bard use an arcane focus?



Positive scalar curvature in dimension 4


Does the curvature determine the metric?why positive scalar curvature manifoldsCorollary to Preissman's theoremWhen can a manifold be curvature free?Positive Ricci curvature vs sectional curvatureTrying to Understand Scalar Curvature – Send Help!Does the proof of Yamabe problem gives a method for finding metric of constant scalar curvature?Does positive Yamabe invariant imply every metric in that conformal class has positive scalar curvature?Positive scalar curvature metric on $S^4$Compact totally geodesic submanifolds in manifold with positive sectional curvature













5












$begingroup$


Let $M^n$ be a compact simply connected spin manifold.



Gromov, Lawson, and Stolz proved that if $ngeq 5$, then $M$ admits a metric of positive scalar curvature iff $alpha(M)=0$.



Question: What happens in dimension 4?



  1. Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have a metric of positive scalar curvature and $alpha(M)neq 0$?

  2. Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have $alpha(M)=0$ but no metric of positive scalar curvature?

  3. What are necessary and/or sufficient conditions for a compact simply connected spin 4-manifold to have a metric with positive scalar curvature?









share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    Let $M^n$ be a compact simply connected spin manifold.



    Gromov, Lawson, and Stolz proved that if $ngeq 5$, then $M$ admits a metric of positive scalar curvature iff $alpha(M)=0$.



    Question: What happens in dimension 4?



    1. Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have a metric of positive scalar curvature and $alpha(M)neq 0$?

    2. Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have $alpha(M)=0$ but no metric of positive scalar curvature?

    3. What are necessary and/or sufficient conditions for a compact simply connected spin 4-manifold to have a metric with positive scalar curvature?









    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5


      2



      $begingroup$


      Let $M^n$ be a compact simply connected spin manifold.



      Gromov, Lawson, and Stolz proved that if $ngeq 5$, then $M$ admits a metric of positive scalar curvature iff $alpha(M)=0$.



      Question: What happens in dimension 4?



      1. Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have a metric of positive scalar curvature and $alpha(M)neq 0$?

      2. Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have $alpha(M)=0$ but no metric of positive scalar curvature?

      3. What are necessary and/or sufficient conditions for a compact simply connected spin 4-manifold to have a metric with positive scalar curvature?









      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $M^n$ be a compact simply connected spin manifold.



      Gromov, Lawson, and Stolz proved that if $ngeq 5$, then $M$ admits a metric of positive scalar curvature iff $alpha(M)=0$.



      Question: What happens in dimension 4?



      1. Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have a metric of positive scalar curvature and $alpha(M)neq 0$?

      2. Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have $alpha(M)=0$ but no metric of positive scalar curvature?

      3. What are necessary and/or sufficient conditions for a compact simply connected spin 4-manifold to have a metric with positive scalar curvature?






      differential-geometry riemannian-geometry 4-manifolds






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 21 '18 at 11:41









      Michael Albanese

      64.2k1599313




      64.2k1599313










      asked Mar 21 '18 at 4:05









      rpfrpf

      1,110513




      1,110513




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          1. Lichnerowicz proved that if $M$ is a closed spin manifold which admits a positive scalar curvature metric, then $hatA(M) = 0$. In dimensions $4k$, $alpha(M) = 2hatA(M)$, so it follows that $alpha(M) = 0$. In fact, Hitchin proved that $alpha(M) = 0$, regardless of dimension.



          2. In dimension four, $hatA(M) = -frac124p_1(M) = -frac18tau(M)$, so $alpha(M) = 0$ if and only if $tau(M) = 0$. If $M$ is a simply connected, closed, spin four-manifold with signature zero, then by Freedman's classification, there is an integer $k geq 0$ such that $M$ is homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, the connected sum of $k$ copies of $S^2times S^2$; note, the connected sum of zero copies of $S^2times S^2$ is defined to be $S^4$. If $M$ is diffeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, then $M$ admits positive scalar curvature metrics. Said another way, the topological manifolds $k(S^2times S^2)$ all admit positive scalar curvature for their standard smooth structure.



            A closed four-manifold can potentially admit a countably infinite number of smooth structures, and the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric depends on which smooth structure you choose. So it is possible that for some choice of $k$ and some choice of smooth structure on $k(S^2times S^2)$, there does not admit a positive scalar curvature metric. Such examples exist. In Hirzebruch Surfaces: Degenerations,
            Related Braid Monodromy, Galois Covers
            , Teichner constructs examples of simply connected general-type complex surfaces which are spin and have signature zero; see Theorem $5.8$. These are homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$ for some $k$, but general type surfaces do not admit positive scalar curvature metrics.



          3. In dimension four, unlike in other dimensions, there are gauge theoretic obstructions to the existence of positive scalar curvature metrics. In particular, on a closed smooth four-manifold with $b^+ geq 2$, the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric implies that all of its Seiberg-Witten invariants vanish. This is a necessary condition, but it is not sufficient. Note that these invariants are usually too complicated to calculate, except in ideal situations such as when the four-manifold in question is the underlying four-manifold of a Kähler surface.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2701251%2fpositive-scalar-curvature-in-dimension-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            1. Lichnerowicz proved that if $M$ is a closed spin manifold which admits a positive scalar curvature metric, then $hatA(M) = 0$. In dimensions $4k$, $alpha(M) = 2hatA(M)$, so it follows that $alpha(M) = 0$. In fact, Hitchin proved that $alpha(M) = 0$, regardless of dimension.



            2. In dimension four, $hatA(M) = -frac124p_1(M) = -frac18tau(M)$, so $alpha(M) = 0$ if and only if $tau(M) = 0$. If $M$ is a simply connected, closed, spin four-manifold with signature zero, then by Freedman's classification, there is an integer $k geq 0$ such that $M$ is homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, the connected sum of $k$ copies of $S^2times S^2$; note, the connected sum of zero copies of $S^2times S^2$ is defined to be $S^4$. If $M$ is diffeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, then $M$ admits positive scalar curvature metrics. Said another way, the topological manifolds $k(S^2times S^2)$ all admit positive scalar curvature for their standard smooth structure.



              A closed four-manifold can potentially admit a countably infinite number of smooth structures, and the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric depends on which smooth structure you choose. So it is possible that for some choice of $k$ and some choice of smooth structure on $k(S^2times S^2)$, there does not admit a positive scalar curvature metric. Such examples exist. In Hirzebruch Surfaces: Degenerations,
              Related Braid Monodromy, Galois Covers
              , Teichner constructs examples of simply connected general-type complex surfaces which are spin and have signature zero; see Theorem $5.8$. These are homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$ for some $k$, but general type surfaces do not admit positive scalar curvature metrics.



            3. In dimension four, unlike in other dimensions, there are gauge theoretic obstructions to the existence of positive scalar curvature metrics. In particular, on a closed smooth four-manifold with $b^+ geq 2$, the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric implies that all of its Seiberg-Witten invariants vanish. This is a necessary condition, but it is not sufficient. Note that these invariants are usually too complicated to calculate, except in ideal situations such as when the four-manifold in question is the underlying four-manifold of a Kähler surface.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              5












              $begingroup$

              1. Lichnerowicz proved that if $M$ is a closed spin manifold which admits a positive scalar curvature metric, then $hatA(M) = 0$. In dimensions $4k$, $alpha(M) = 2hatA(M)$, so it follows that $alpha(M) = 0$. In fact, Hitchin proved that $alpha(M) = 0$, regardless of dimension.



              2. In dimension four, $hatA(M) = -frac124p_1(M) = -frac18tau(M)$, so $alpha(M) = 0$ if and only if $tau(M) = 0$. If $M$ is a simply connected, closed, spin four-manifold with signature zero, then by Freedman's classification, there is an integer $k geq 0$ such that $M$ is homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, the connected sum of $k$ copies of $S^2times S^2$; note, the connected sum of zero copies of $S^2times S^2$ is defined to be $S^4$. If $M$ is diffeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, then $M$ admits positive scalar curvature metrics. Said another way, the topological manifolds $k(S^2times S^2)$ all admit positive scalar curvature for their standard smooth structure.



                A closed four-manifold can potentially admit a countably infinite number of smooth structures, and the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric depends on which smooth structure you choose. So it is possible that for some choice of $k$ and some choice of smooth structure on $k(S^2times S^2)$, there does not admit a positive scalar curvature metric. Such examples exist. In Hirzebruch Surfaces: Degenerations,
                Related Braid Monodromy, Galois Covers
                , Teichner constructs examples of simply connected general-type complex surfaces which are spin and have signature zero; see Theorem $5.8$. These are homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$ for some $k$, but general type surfaces do not admit positive scalar curvature metrics.



              3. In dimension four, unlike in other dimensions, there are gauge theoretic obstructions to the existence of positive scalar curvature metrics. In particular, on a closed smooth four-manifold with $b^+ geq 2$, the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric implies that all of its Seiberg-Witten invariants vanish. This is a necessary condition, but it is not sufficient. Note that these invariants are usually too complicated to calculate, except in ideal situations such as when the four-manifold in question is the underlying four-manifold of a Kähler surface.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                5












                5








                5





                $begingroup$

                1. Lichnerowicz proved that if $M$ is a closed spin manifold which admits a positive scalar curvature metric, then $hatA(M) = 0$. In dimensions $4k$, $alpha(M) = 2hatA(M)$, so it follows that $alpha(M) = 0$. In fact, Hitchin proved that $alpha(M) = 0$, regardless of dimension.



                2. In dimension four, $hatA(M) = -frac124p_1(M) = -frac18tau(M)$, so $alpha(M) = 0$ if and only if $tau(M) = 0$. If $M$ is a simply connected, closed, spin four-manifold with signature zero, then by Freedman's classification, there is an integer $k geq 0$ such that $M$ is homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, the connected sum of $k$ copies of $S^2times S^2$; note, the connected sum of zero copies of $S^2times S^2$ is defined to be $S^4$. If $M$ is diffeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, then $M$ admits positive scalar curvature metrics. Said another way, the topological manifolds $k(S^2times S^2)$ all admit positive scalar curvature for their standard smooth structure.



                  A closed four-manifold can potentially admit a countably infinite number of smooth structures, and the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric depends on which smooth structure you choose. So it is possible that for some choice of $k$ and some choice of smooth structure on $k(S^2times S^2)$, there does not admit a positive scalar curvature metric. Such examples exist. In Hirzebruch Surfaces: Degenerations,
                  Related Braid Monodromy, Galois Covers
                  , Teichner constructs examples of simply connected general-type complex surfaces which are spin and have signature zero; see Theorem $5.8$. These are homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$ for some $k$, but general type surfaces do not admit positive scalar curvature metrics.



                3. In dimension four, unlike in other dimensions, there are gauge theoretic obstructions to the existence of positive scalar curvature metrics. In particular, on a closed smooth four-manifold with $b^+ geq 2$, the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric implies that all of its Seiberg-Witten invariants vanish. This is a necessary condition, but it is not sufficient. Note that these invariants are usually too complicated to calculate, except in ideal situations such as when the four-manifold in question is the underlying four-manifold of a Kähler surface.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                1. Lichnerowicz proved that if $M$ is a closed spin manifold which admits a positive scalar curvature metric, then $hatA(M) = 0$. In dimensions $4k$, $alpha(M) = 2hatA(M)$, so it follows that $alpha(M) = 0$. In fact, Hitchin proved that $alpha(M) = 0$, regardless of dimension.



                2. In dimension four, $hatA(M) = -frac124p_1(M) = -frac18tau(M)$, so $alpha(M) = 0$ if and only if $tau(M) = 0$. If $M$ is a simply connected, closed, spin four-manifold with signature zero, then by Freedman's classification, there is an integer $k geq 0$ such that $M$ is homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, the connected sum of $k$ copies of $S^2times S^2$; note, the connected sum of zero copies of $S^2times S^2$ is defined to be $S^4$. If $M$ is diffeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, then $M$ admits positive scalar curvature metrics. Said another way, the topological manifolds $k(S^2times S^2)$ all admit positive scalar curvature for their standard smooth structure.



                  A closed four-manifold can potentially admit a countably infinite number of smooth structures, and the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric depends on which smooth structure you choose. So it is possible that for some choice of $k$ and some choice of smooth structure on $k(S^2times S^2)$, there does not admit a positive scalar curvature metric. Such examples exist. In Hirzebruch Surfaces: Degenerations,
                  Related Braid Monodromy, Galois Covers
                  , Teichner constructs examples of simply connected general-type complex surfaces which are spin and have signature zero; see Theorem $5.8$. These are homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$ for some $k$, but general type surfaces do not admit positive scalar curvature metrics.



                3. In dimension four, unlike in other dimensions, there are gauge theoretic obstructions to the existence of positive scalar curvature metrics. In particular, on a closed smooth four-manifold with $b^+ geq 2$, the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric implies that all of its Seiberg-Witten invariants vanish. This is a necessary condition, but it is not sufficient. Note that these invariants are usually too complicated to calculate, except in ideal situations such as when the four-manifold in question is the underlying four-manifold of a Kähler surface.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Mar 16 at 21:08

























                answered Mar 21 '18 at 11:33









                Michael AlbaneseMichael Albanese

                64.2k1599313




                64.2k1599313



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2701251%2fpositive-scalar-curvature-in-dimension-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

                    Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

                    Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers