Positive scalar curvature in dimension 4Does the curvature determine the metric?why positive scalar curvature manifoldsCorollary to Preissman's theoremWhen can a manifold be curvature free?Positive Ricci curvature vs sectional curvatureTrying to Understand Scalar Curvature – Send Help!Does the proof of Yamabe problem gives a method for finding metric of constant scalar curvature?Does positive Yamabe invariant imply every metric in that conformal class has positive scalar curvature?Positive scalar curvature metric on $S^4$Compact totally geodesic submanifolds in manifold with positive sectional curvature
In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales were already rare?
Can I rely on these GitHub repository files?
Visiting the UK as unmarried couple
Is exact Kanji stroke length important?
The One-Electron Universe postulate is true - what simple change can I make to change the whole universe?
Blender - show edges angles “direction”
What is the opposite of 'gravitas'?
Can I create an upright 7-foot × 5-foot wall with the Minor Illusion spell?
How can a jailer prevent the Forge Cleric's Artisan's Blessing from being used?
Superhero words!
Can the harmonic series explain the origin of the major scale?
What should I use for Mishna study?
How to prevent YouTube from showing already watched videos?
A known event to a history junkie
Indicating multiple different modes of speech (fantasy language or telepathy)
Can the electrostatic force be infinite in magnitude?
How can I raise concerns with a new DM about XP splitting?
Perfect riffle shuffles
Did US corporations pay demonstrators in the German demonstrations against article 13?
Can a malicious addon access internet history and such in chrome/firefox?
Is it okay / does it make sense for another player to join a running game of Munchkin?
"lassen" in meaning "sich fassen"
node command while defining a coordinate in TikZ
Can a Bard use an arcane focus?
Positive scalar curvature in dimension 4
Does the curvature determine the metric?why positive scalar curvature manifoldsCorollary to Preissman's theoremWhen can a manifold be curvature free?Positive Ricci curvature vs sectional curvatureTrying to Understand Scalar Curvature – Send Help!Does the proof of Yamabe problem gives a method for finding metric of constant scalar curvature?Does positive Yamabe invariant imply every metric in that conformal class has positive scalar curvature?Positive scalar curvature metric on $S^4$Compact totally geodesic submanifolds in manifold with positive sectional curvature
$begingroup$
Let $M^n$ be a compact simply connected spin manifold.
Gromov, Lawson, and Stolz proved that if $ngeq 5$, then $M$ admits a metric of positive scalar curvature iff $alpha(M)=0$.
Question: What happens in dimension 4?
- Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have a metric of positive scalar curvature and $alpha(M)neq 0$?
- Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have $alpha(M)=0$ but no metric of positive scalar curvature?
- What are necessary and/or sufficient conditions for a compact simply connected spin 4-manifold to have a metric with positive scalar curvature?
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry 4-manifolds
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $M^n$ be a compact simply connected spin manifold.
Gromov, Lawson, and Stolz proved that if $ngeq 5$, then $M$ admits a metric of positive scalar curvature iff $alpha(M)=0$.
Question: What happens in dimension 4?
- Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have a metric of positive scalar curvature and $alpha(M)neq 0$?
- Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have $alpha(M)=0$ but no metric of positive scalar curvature?
- What are necessary and/or sufficient conditions for a compact simply connected spin 4-manifold to have a metric with positive scalar curvature?
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry 4-manifolds
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $M^n$ be a compact simply connected spin manifold.
Gromov, Lawson, and Stolz proved that if $ngeq 5$, then $M$ admits a metric of positive scalar curvature iff $alpha(M)=0$.
Question: What happens in dimension 4?
- Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have a metric of positive scalar curvature and $alpha(M)neq 0$?
- Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have $alpha(M)=0$ but no metric of positive scalar curvature?
- What are necessary and/or sufficient conditions for a compact simply connected spin 4-manifold to have a metric with positive scalar curvature?
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry 4-manifolds
$endgroup$
Let $M^n$ be a compact simply connected spin manifold.
Gromov, Lawson, and Stolz proved that if $ngeq 5$, then $M$ admits a metric of positive scalar curvature iff $alpha(M)=0$.
Question: What happens in dimension 4?
- Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have a metric of positive scalar curvature and $alpha(M)neq 0$?
- Are there compact simply connected spin manifolds of dimension 4 which have $alpha(M)=0$ but no metric of positive scalar curvature?
- What are necessary and/or sufficient conditions for a compact simply connected spin 4-manifold to have a metric with positive scalar curvature?
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry 4-manifolds
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry 4-manifolds
edited Mar 21 '18 at 11:41
Michael Albanese
64.2k1599313
64.2k1599313
asked Mar 21 '18 at 4:05
rpfrpf
1,110513
1,110513
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Lichnerowicz proved that if $M$ is a closed spin manifold which admits a positive scalar curvature metric, then $hatA(M) = 0$. In dimensions $4k$, $alpha(M) = 2hatA(M)$, so it follows that $alpha(M) = 0$. In fact, Hitchin proved that $alpha(M) = 0$, regardless of dimension.
In dimension four, $hatA(M) = -frac124p_1(M) = -frac18tau(M)$, so $alpha(M) = 0$ if and only if $tau(M) = 0$. If $M$ is a simply connected, closed, spin four-manifold with signature zero, then by Freedman's classification, there is an integer $k geq 0$ such that $M$ is homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, the connected sum of $k$ copies of $S^2times S^2$; note, the connected sum of zero copies of $S^2times S^2$ is defined to be $S^4$. If $M$ is diffeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, then $M$ admits positive scalar curvature metrics. Said another way, the topological manifolds $k(S^2times S^2)$ all admit positive scalar curvature for their standard smooth structure.
A closed four-manifold can potentially admit a countably infinite number of smooth structures, and the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric depends on which smooth structure you choose. So it is possible that for some choice of $k$ and some choice of smooth structure on $k(S^2times S^2)$, there does not admit a positive scalar curvature metric. Such examples exist. In Hirzebruch Surfaces: Degenerations,
Related Braid Monodromy, Galois Covers, Teichner constructs examples of simply connected general-type complex surfaces which are spin and have signature zero; see Theorem $5.8$. These are homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$ for some $k$, but general type surfaces do not admit positive scalar curvature metrics.In dimension four, unlike in other dimensions, there are gauge theoretic obstructions to the existence of positive scalar curvature metrics. In particular, on a closed smooth four-manifold with $b^+ geq 2$, the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric implies that all of its Seiberg-Witten invariants vanish. This is a necessary condition, but it is not sufficient. Note that these invariants are usually too complicated to calculate, except in ideal situations such as when the four-manifold in question is the underlying four-manifold of a Kähler surface.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2701251%2fpositive-scalar-curvature-in-dimension-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Lichnerowicz proved that if $M$ is a closed spin manifold which admits a positive scalar curvature metric, then $hatA(M) = 0$. In dimensions $4k$, $alpha(M) = 2hatA(M)$, so it follows that $alpha(M) = 0$. In fact, Hitchin proved that $alpha(M) = 0$, regardless of dimension.
In dimension four, $hatA(M) = -frac124p_1(M) = -frac18tau(M)$, so $alpha(M) = 0$ if and only if $tau(M) = 0$. If $M$ is a simply connected, closed, spin four-manifold with signature zero, then by Freedman's classification, there is an integer $k geq 0$ such that $M$ is homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, the connected sum of $k$ copies of $S^2times S^2$; note, the connected sum of zero copies of $S^2times S^2$ is defined to be $S^4$. If $M$ is diffeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, then $M$ admits positive scalar curvature metrics. Said another way, the topological manifolds $k(S^2times S^2)$ all admit positive scalar curvature for their standard smooth structure.
A closed four-manifold can potentially admit a countably infinite number of smooth structures, and the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric depends on which smooth structure you choose. So it is possible that for some choice of $k$ and some choice of smooth structure on $k(S^2times S^2)$, there does not admit a positive scalar curvature metric. Such examples exist. In Hirzebruch Surfaces: Degenerations,
Related Braid Monodromy, Galois Covers, Teichner constructs examples of simply connected general-type complex surfaces which are spin and have signature zero; see Theorem $5.8$. These are homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$ for some $k$, but general type surfaces do not admit positive scalar curvature metrics.In dimension four, unlike in other dimensions, there are gauge theoretic obstructions to the existence of positive scalar curvature metrics. In particular, on a closed smooth four-manifold with $b^+ geq 2$, the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric implies that all of its Seiberg-Witten invariants vanish. This is a necessary condition, but it is not sufficient. Note that these invariants are usually too complicated to calculate, except in ideal situations such as when the four-manifold in question is the underlying four-manifold of a Kähler surface.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lichnerowicz proved that if $M$ is a closed spin manifold which admits a positive scalar curvature metric, then $hatA(M) = 0$. In dimensions $4k$, $alpha(M) = 2hatA(M)$, so it follows that $alpha(M) = 0$. In fact, Hitchin proved that $alpha(M) = 0$, regardless of dimension.
In dimension four, $hatA(M) = -frac124p_1(M) = -frac18tau(M)$, so $alpha(M) = 0$ if and only if $tau(M) = 0$. If $M$ is a simply connected, closed, spin four-manifold with signature zero, then by Freedman's classification, there is an integer $k geq 0$ such that $M$ is homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, the connected sum of $k$ copies of $S^2times S^2$; note, the connected sum of zero copies of $S^2times S^2$ is defined to be $S^4$. If $M$ is diffeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, then $M$ admits positive scalar curvature metrics. Said another way, the topological manifolds $k(S^2times S^2)$ all admit positive scalar curvature for their standard smooth structure.
A closed four-manifold can potentially admit a countably infinite number of smooth structures, and the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric depends on which smooth structure you choose. So it is possible that for some choice of $k$ and some choice of smooth structure on $k(S^2times S^2)$, there does not admit a positive scalar curvature metric. Such examples exist. In Hirzebruch Surfaces: Degenerations,
Related Braid Monodromy, Galois Covers, Teichner constructs examples of simply connected general-type complex surfaces which are spin and have signature zero; see Theorem $5.8$. These are homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$ for some $k$, but general type surfaces do not admit positive scalar curvature metrics.In dimension four, unlike in other dimensions, there are gauge theoretic obstructions to the existence of positive scalar curvature metrics. In particular, on a closed smooth four-manifold with $b^+ geq 2$, the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric implies that all of its Seiberg-Witten invariants vanish. This is a necessary condition, but it is not sufficient. Note that these invariants are usually too complicated to calculate, except in ideal situations such as when the four-manifold in question is the underlying four-manifold of a Kähler surface.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lichnerowicz proved that if $M$ is a closed spin manifold which admits a positive scalar curvature metric, then $hatA(M) = 0$. In dimensions $4k$, $alpha(M) = 2hatA(M)$, so it follows that $alpha(M) = 0$. In fact, Hitchin proved that $alpha(M) = 0$, regardless of dimension.
In dimension four, $hatA(M) = -frac124p_1(M) = -frac18tau(M)$, so $alpha(M) = 0$ if and only if $tau(M) = 0$. If $M$ is a simply connected, closed, spin four-manifold with signature zero, then by Freedman's classification, there is an integer $k geq 0$ such that $M$ is homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, the connected sum of $k$ copies of $S^2times S^2$; note, the connected sum of zero copies of $S^2times S^2$ is defined to be $S^4$. If $M$ is diffeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, then $M$ admits positive scalar curvature metrics. Said another way, the topological manifolds $k(S^2times S^2)$ all admit positive scalar curvature for their standard smooth structure.
A closed four-manifold can potentially admit a countably infinite number of smooth structures, and the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric depends on which smooth structure you choose. So it is possible that for some choice of $k$ and some choice of smooth structure on $k(S^2times S^2)$, there does not admit a positive scalar curvature metric. Such examples exist. In Hirzebruch Surfaces: Degenerations,
Related Braid Monodromy, Galois Covers, Teichner constructs examples of simply connected general-type complex surfaces which are spin and have signature zero; see Theorem $5.8$. These are homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$ for some $k$, but general type surfaces do not admit positive scalar curvature metrics.In dimension four, unlike in other dimensions, there are gauge theoretic obstructions to the existence of positive scalar curvature metrics. In particular, on a closed smooth four-manifold with $b^+ geq 2$, the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric implies that all of its Seiberg-Witten invariants vanish. This is a necessary condition, but it is not sufficient. Note that these invariants are usually too complicated to calculate, except in ideal situations such as when the four-manifold in question is the underlying four-manifold of a Kähler surface.
$endgroup$
Lichnerowicz proved that if $M$ is a closed spin manifold which admits a positive scalar curvature metric, then $hatA(M) = 0$. In dimensions $4k$, $alpha(M) = 2hatA(M)$, so it follows that $alpha(M) = 0$. In fact, Hitchin proved that $alpha(M) = 0$, regardless of dimension.
In dimension four, $hatA(M) = -frac124p_1(M) = -frac18tau(M)$, so $alpha(M) = 0$ if and only if $tau(M) = 0$. If $M$ is a simply connected, closed, spin four-manifold with signature zero, then by Freedman's classification, there is an integer $k geq 0$ such that $M$ is homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, the connected sum of $k$ copies of $S^2times S^2$; note, the connected sum of zero copies of $S^2times S^2$ is defined to be $S^4$. If $M$ is diffeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$, then $M$ admits positive scalar curvature metrics. Said another way, the topological manifolds $k(S^2times S^2)$ all admit positive scalar curvature for their standard smooth structure.
A closed four-manifold can potentially admit a countably infinite number of smooth structures, and the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric depends on which smooth structure you choose. So it is possible that for some choice of $k$ and some choice of smooth structure on $k(S^2times S^2)$, there does not admit a positive scalar curvature metric. Such examples exist. In Hirzebruch Surfaces: Degenerations,
Related Braid Monodromy, Galois Covers, Teichner constructs examples of simply connected general-type complex surfaces which are spin and have signature zero; see Theorem $5.8$. These are homeomorphic to $k(S^2times S^2)$ for some $k$, but general type surfaces do not admit positive scalar curvature metrics.In dimension four, unlike in other dimensions, there are gauge theoretic obstructions to the existence of positive scalar curvature metrics. In particular, on a closed smooth four-manifold with $b^+ geq 2$, the existence of a positive scalar curvature metric implies that all of its Seiberg-Witten invariants vanish. This is a necessary condition, but it is not sufficient. Note that these invariants are usually too complicated to calculate, except in ideal situations such as when the four-manifold in question is the underlying four-manifold of a Kähler surface.
edited Mar 16 at 21:08
answered Mar 21 '18 at 11:33
Michael AlbaneseMichael Albanese
64.2k1599313
64.2k1599313
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2701251%2fpositive-scalar-curvature-in-dimension-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown