Characterizing triangles with integer-degree angles that are similar to any of their iterated orthic trianglesProof of “triangles are similar iff corresponding angles are equal”Similar Triangles with proportionsSimilar triangles anglesSimilar Triangles Problem (No corresponding sides)Finding the largest equilateral triangle inside a given triangleIs there a relationship for a triangle's side lengths, altitude/height, and acute/obtuse/right?How are these triangles similar?Finding the area of an orthic triangle (DEF) when given vertices of triangle ABC.Mobius transformation producing a curved triangle with 3 intersecting circlesSAT Math Problem - Corresponding Angles in Similar Triangles
Should a narrator ever describe things based on a characters view instead of fact?
Knife as defense against stray dogs
Have any astronauts/cosmonauts died in space?
Someone scrambled my calling sign- who am I?
TDE Master Key Rotation
How can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?
Why doesn't the chatan sign the ketubah?
How to balance a monster modification (zombie)?
Why is this tree refusing to shed its dead leaves?
10 year ban after applying for a UK student visa
Are hand made posters acceptable in Academia?
pipe commands inside find -exec?
How much propellant is used up until liftoff?
Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?
Norwegian Refugee travel document
Don't understand why (5 | -2) > 0 is False where (5 or -2) > 0 is True
Would it be believable to defy demographics in a story?
Is "inadequate referencing" a euphemism for plagiarism?
Hackerrank All Women's Codesprint 2019: Name the Product
Can "few" be used as a subject? If so, what is the rule?
Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?
Is there any common country to visit for uk and schengen visa?
Does convergence of polynomials imply that of its coefficients?
Splitting fasta file into smaller files based on header pattern
Characterizing triangles with integer-degree angles that are similar to any of their iterated orthic triangles
Proof of “triangles are similar iff corresponding angles are equal”Similar Triangles with proportionsSimilar triangles anglesSimilar Triangles Problem (No corresponding sides)Finding the largest equilateral triangle inside a given triangleIs there a relationship for a triangle's side lengths, altitude/height, and acute/obtuse/right?How are these triangles similar?Finding the area of an orthic triangle (DEF) when given vertices of triangle ABC.Mobius transformation producing a curved triangle with 3 intersecting circlesSAT Math Problem - Corresponding Angles in Similar Triangles
$begingroup$
A triangle has integer angles $a,b,c$ (in degrees) and we create the triangle's pedal triangle and call it Pedal-$(1)$. (Here, "pedal triangle" means the specific pedal triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle; in other words, the orthic triangle.)
Pedal-$(n)$'s pedal triangle is Pedal-$(n+1)$.
If the original triangle is similar to any Pedal-$(n)$'s we call it a "x" triangle.
I got if a triangle is a "x" triangle then $a,b,c$ must be divisible by $4$.
But not that if $a,b,c$ are divisible by $4$ then the triangle must be a "x" triangle.
And trying all the trios for $a,b,c$ divisible by $4$ shows that every triangle in this category is indeed a "x" triangle?
Why does this happen?
geometry number-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A triangle has integer angles $a,b,c$ (in degrees) and we create the triangle's pedal triangle and call it Pedal-$(1)$. (Here, "pedal triangle" means the specific pedal triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle; in other words, the orthic triangle.)
Pedal-$(n)$'s pedal triangle is Pedal-$(n+1)$.
If the original triangle is similar to any Pedal-$(n)$'s we call it a "x" triangle.
I got if a triangle is a "x" triangle then $a,b,c$ must be divisible by $4$.
But not that if $a,b,c$ are divisible by $4$ then the triangle must be a "x" triangle.
And trying all the trios for $a,b,c$ divisible by $4$ shows that every triangle in this category is indeed a "x" triangle?
Why does this happen?
geometry number-theory
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Mar 13 at 7:45
1
$begingroup$
Yes i mean the orthic triangle
$endgroup$
– Shauryam Akhoury
Mar 13 at 7:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A triangle has integer angles $a,b,c$ (in degrees) and we create the triangle's pedal triangle and call it Pedal-$(1)$. (Here, "pedal triangle" means the specific pedal triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle; in other words, the orthic triangle.)
Pedal-$(n)$'s pedal triangle is Pedal-$(n+1)$.
If the original triangle is similar to any Pedal-$(n)$'s we call it a "x" triangle.
I got if a triangle is a "x" triangle then $a,b,c$ must be divisible by $4$.
But not that if $a,b,c$ are divisible by $4$ then the triangle must be a "x" triangle.
And trying all the trios for $a,b,c$ divisible by $4$ shows that every triangle in this category is indeed a "x" triangle?
Why does this happen?
geometry number-theory
$endgroup$
A triangle has integer angles $a,b,c$ (in degrees) and we create the triangle's pedal triangle and call it Pedal-$(1)$. (Here, "pedal triangle" means the specific pedal triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle; in other words, the orthic triangle.)
Pedal-$(n)$'s pedal triangle is Pedal-$(n+1)$.
If the original triangle is similar to any Pedal-$(n)$'s we call it a "x" triangle.
I got if a triangle is a "x" triangle then $a,b,c$ must be divisible by $4$.
But not that if $a,b,c$ are divisible by $4$ then the triangle must be a "x" triangle.
And trying all the trios for $a,b,c$ divisible by $4$ shows that every triangle in this category is indeed a "x" triangle?
Why does this happen?
geometry number-theory
geometry number-theory
edited Mar 13 at 8:01
Blue
49.1k870156
49.1k870156
asked Mar 13 at 7:06
Shauryam AkhouryShauryam Akhoury
5216
5216
1
$begingroup$
What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Mar 13 at 7:45
1
$begingroup$
Yes i mean the orthic triangle
$endgroup$
– Shauryam Akhoury
Mar 13 at 7:52
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Mar 13 at 7:45
1
$begingroup$
Yes i mean the orthic triangle
$endgroup$
– Shauryam Akhoury
Mar 13 at 7:52
1
1
$begingroup$
What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Mar 13 at 7:45
$begingroup$
What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Mar 13 at 7:45
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes i mean the orthic triangle
$endgroup$
– Shauryam Akhoury
Mar 13 at 7:52
$begingroup$
Yes i mean the orthic triangle
$endgroup$
– Shauryam Akhoury
Mar 13 at 7:52
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
$$
cases
(180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
(2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\
$$
That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.
On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
$$
cases
a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\
$$
No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.
In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146204%2fcharacterizing-triangles-with-integer-degree-angles-that-are-similar-to-any-of-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
$$
cases
(180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
(2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\
$$
That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.
On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
$$
cases
a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\
$$
No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.
In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
$$
cases
(180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
(2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\
$$
That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.
On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
$$
cases
a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\
$$
No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.
In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
$$
cases
(180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
(2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\
$$
That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.
On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
$$
cases
a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\
$$
No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.
In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.
$endgroup$
If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
$$
cases
(180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
(2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\
$$
That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.
On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
$$
cases
a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\
$$
No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.
In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.
edited Mar 14 at 14:10
answered Mar 14 at 9:51
AretinoAretino
25.3k21445
25.3k21445
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146204%2fcharacterizing-triangles-with-integer-degree-angles-that-are-similar-to-any-of-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Mar 13 at 7:45
1
$begingroup$
Yes i mean the orthic triangle
$endgroup$
– Shauryam Akhoury
Mar 13 at 7:52