Characterizing triangles with integer-degree angles that are similar to any of their iterated orthic trianglesProof of “triangles are similar iff corresponding angles are equal”Similar Triangles with proportionsSimilar triangles anglesSimilar Triangles Problem (No corresponding sides)Finding the largest equilateral triangle inside a given triangleIs there a relationship for a triangle's side lengths, altitude/height, and acute/obtuse/right?How are these triangles similar?Finding the area of an orthic triangle (DEF) when given vertices of triangle ABC.Mobius transformation producing a curved triangle with 3 intersecting circlesSAT Math Problem - Corresponding Angles in Similar Triangles

Should a narrator ever describe things based on a characters view instead of fact?

Knife as defense against stray dogs

Have any astronauts/cosmonauts died in space?

Someone scrambled my calling sign- who am I?

TDE Master Key Rotation

How can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?

Why doesn't the chatan sign the ketubah?

How to balance a monster modification (zombie)?

Why is this tree refusing to shed its dead leaves?

10 year ban after applying for a UK student visa

Are hand made posters acceptable in Academia?

pipe commands inside find -exec?

How much propellant is used up until liftoff?

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Norwegian Refugee travel document

Don't understand why (5 | -2) > 0 is False where (5 or -2) > 0 is True

Would it be believable to defy demographics in a story?

Is "inadequate referencing" a euphemism for plagiarism?

Hackerrank All Women's Codesprint 2019: Name the Product

Can "few" be used as a subject? If so, what is the rule?

Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?

Is there any common country to visit for uk and schengen visa?

Does convergence of polynomials imply that of its coefficients?

Splitting fasta file into smaller files based on header pattern



Characterizing triangles with integer-degree angles that are similar to any of their iterated orthic triangles


Proof of “triangles are similar iff corresponding angles are equal”Similar Triangles with proportionsSimilar triangles anglesSimilar Triangles Problem (No corresponding sides)Finding the largest equilateral triangle inside a given triangleIs there a relationship for a triangle's side lengths, altitude/height, and acute/obtuse/right?How are these triangles similar?Finding the area of an orthic triangle (DEF) when given vertices of triangle ABC.Mobius transformation producing a curved triangle with 3 intersecting circlesSAT Math Problem - Corresponding Angles in Similar Triangles













3












$begingroup$


A triangle has integer angles $a,b,c$ (in degrees) and we create the triangle's pedal triangle and call it Pedal-$(1)$. (Here, "pedal triangle" means the specific pedal triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle; in other words, the orthic triangle.)



Pedal-$(n)$'s pedal triangle is Pedal-$(n+1)$.



If the original triangle is similar to any Pedal-$(n)$'s we call it a "x" triangle.



I got if a triangle is a "x" triangle then $a,b,c$ must be divisible by $4$.
But not that if $a,b,c$ are divisible by $4$ then the triangle must be a "x" triangle.



And trying all the trios for $a,b,c$ divisible by $4$ shows that every triangle in this category is indeed a "x" triangle?



Why does this happen?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 13 at 7:45







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes i mean the orthic triangle
    $endgroup$
    – Shauryam Akhoury
    Mar 13 at 7:52















3












$begingroup$


A triangle has integer angles $a,b,c$ (in degrees) and we create the triangle's pedal triangle and call it Pedal-$(1)$. (Here, "pedal triangle" means the specific pedal triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle; in other words, the orthic triangle.)



Pedal-$(n)$'s pedal triangle is Pedal-$(n+1)$.



If the original triangle is similar to any Pedal-$(n)$'s we call it a "x" triangle.



I got if a triangle is a "x" triangle then $a,b,c$ must be divisible by $4$.
But not that if $a,b,c$ are divisible by $4$ then the triangle must be a "x" triangle.



And trying all the trios for $a,b,c$ divisible by $4$ shows that every triangle in this category is indeed a "x" triangle?



Why does this happen?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 13 at 7:45







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes i mean the orthic triangle
    $endgroup$
    – Shauryam Akhoury
    Mar 13 at 7:52













3












3








3


0



$begingroup$


A triangle has integer angles $a,b,c$ (in degrees) and we create the triangle's pedal triangle and call it Pedal-$(1)$. (Here, "pedal triangle" means the specific pedal triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle; in other words, the orthic triangle.)



Pedal-$(n)$'s pedal triangle is Pedal-$(n+1)$.



If the original triangle is similar to any Pedal-$(n)$'s we call it a "x" triangle.



I got if a triangle is a "x" triangle then $a,b,c$ must be divisible by $4$.
But not that if $a,b,c$ are divisible by $4$ then the triangle must be a "x" triangle.



And trying all the trios for $a,b,c$ divisible by $4$ shows that every triangle in this category is indeed a "x" triangle?



Why does this happen?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




A triangle has integer angles $a,b,c$ (in degrees) and we create the triangle's pedal triangle and call it Pedal-$(1)$. (Here, "pedal triangle" means the specific pedal triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle; in other words, the orthic triangle.)



Pedal-$(n)$'s pedal triangle is Pedal-$(n+1)$.



If the original triangle is similar to any Pedal-$(n)$'s we call it a "x" triangle.



I got if a triangle is a "x" triangle then $a,b,c$ must be divisible by $4$.
But not that if $a,b,c$ are divisible by $4$ then the triangle must be a "x" triangle.



And trying all the trios for $a,b,c$ divisible by $4$ shows that every triangle in this category is indeed a "x" triangle?



Why does this happen?







geometry number-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 13 at 8:01









Blue

49.1k870156




49.1k870156










asked Mar 13 at 7:06









Shauryam AkhouryShauryam Akhoury

5216




5216







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 13 at 7:45







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes i mean the orthic triangle
    $endgroup$
    – Shauryam Akhoury
    Mar 13 at 7:52












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 13 at 7:45







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes i mean the orthic triangle
    $endgroup$
    – Shauryam Akhoury
    Mar 13 at 7:52







1




1




$begingroup$
What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Mar 13 at 7:45





$begingroup$
What's your definition of "pedal triangle"? I'm familiar with the term insofar as it requires an additional point of reference, as in "pedal triangle with respect to $P$". Do you mean "orthic triangle" (a triangle whose vertices are the feet of the altitudes of the original triangle)? The orthic triangle is the pedal triangle with respect to the orthocenter, so it's possible that some authors mix the terms.
$endgroup$
– Blue
Mar 13 at 7:45





1




1




$begingroup$
Yes i mean the orthic triangle
$endgroup$
– Shauryam Akhoury
Mar 13 at 7:52




$begingroup$
Yes i mean the orthic triangle
$endgroup$
– Shauryam Akhoury
Mar 13 at 7:52










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
$$
cases
(180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
(2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\
$$

That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.



On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
$$
cases
a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\

$$

No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.



In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146204%2fcharacterizing-triangles-with-integer-degree-angles-that-are-similar-to-any-of-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
    $$
    cases
    (180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
    (2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\
    $$

    That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.



    On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
    $$
    cases
    a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
    a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\

    $$

    No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.



    In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
      $$
      cases
      (180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
      (2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\
      $$

      That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.



      On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
      $$
      cases
      a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
      a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\

      $$

      No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.



      In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
        $$
        cases
        (180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
        (2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\
        $$

        That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.



        On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
        $$
        cases
        a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
        a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\

        $$

        No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.



        In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        If Pedal$(n)$ has angles $(a,b,c)$, then Pedal$(n+1)$ has angles:
        $$
        cases
        (180°-2a,quad 180°-2b,quad 180°-2c)&if Pedal$(n)$ is an acute triangle,\
        (2a-180°,quad2b,quad2c)&if angle $a$ is obtuse.\
        $$

        That of course explains why all "x" triangle must have $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$.



        On the other hand, a triangle $T$, with angles $a$, $b$, $c$ divisible by $4$, is not an "x" triangle only if there is no other triangle with angles divisible by $4$ which has $T$ as orthic triangle. But that is never the case, for $T$ is the orthic triangle of a triangle having angles $a'$, $b'$, $c'$ (also divisible by $4$) given by:
        $$
        cases
        a'=90°-a/2,quad b'=90°-b/2,quad c'=90°-c/2 & if none of $a$, $b$, $c$ is divisible by $8$,\
        a'=90°+a/2,quad b'=b/2,quadquadquad c'=c/2 & if $b$ and $c$ are divisible by $8$ while $a$ is not.\

        $$

        No other case is possible, because $a+b+c=180°$ is not divisible by $8$.



        In other words: in every chain of nested orthic triangles, if the angles of a triangle are divisible by $4$, then the angles of the triangles preceding and following it in the chain are given uniquely by the relations above. Such a chain cannot then have a first or last triangle, nor branches, and sooner or later a triangle with the same angles as the first one must appear.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Mar 14 at 14:10

























        answered Mar 14 at 9:51









        AretinoAretino

        25.3k21445




        25.3k21445



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146204%2fcharacterizing-triangles-with-integer-degree-angles-that-are-similar-to-any-of-t%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

            Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576

            Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?