Density of a subspaceQuestion about limits of weakly convergent sequence in $H^1_0(Omega)$Solution regularity of the heat equation after $t>varepsilon$How to modify a $H^1$ weak convergence sequence so that I have the $L^2$ equi-integrability of gradient?Alternative characterisation of weak derivativesReal Analysis, Folland problem 5.5.63 Hilbert SpacesDemonstrating that constructed solution to PDE satisfies initial conditionSobolev Imbedding and Gagliardo Nirenberg Sobolev inequalityConstructing the limit of functions in $C[a,b]$ with maximum value normIn compact embedding Theorem, $u_0$ lies in $W^1,p(Omega)$?Prove that the space $C^k(barU)$ is Banach.
When should a starting writer get his own webpage?
What are the rules for concealing thieves' tools (or items in general)?
Why does Surtur say that Thor is Asgard's doom?
Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?
What are the consequences of changing the number of hours in a day?
Does convergence of polynomials imply that of its coefficients?
Why is there so much iron?
Have any astronauts/cosmonauts died in space?
If I cast the Enlarge/Reduce spell on an arrow, what weapon could it count as?
How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?
Animating wave motion in water
Did Nintendo change its mind about 68000 SNES?
What is it called when someone votes for an option that's not their first choice?
pipe commands inside find -exec?
What is the difference between something being completely legal and being completely decriminalized?
What kind of footwear is suitable for walking in micro gravity environment?
Can a university suspend a student even when he has left university?
Print a physical multiplication table
Why is this tree refusing to shed its dead leaves?
Recursively updating the MLE as new observations stream in
Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?
PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?
Single word to change groups
"Marked down as someone wanting to sell shares." What does that mean?
Density of a subspace
Question about limits of weakly convergent sequence in $H^1_0(Omega)$Solution regularity of the heat equation after $t>varepsilon$How to modify a $H^1$ weak convergence sequence so that I have the $L^2$ equi-integrability of gradient?Alternative characterisation of weak derivativesReal Analysis, Folland problem 5.5.63 Hilbert SpacesDemonstrating that constructed solution to PDE satisfies initial conditionSobolev Imbedding and Gagliardo Nirenberg Sobolev inequalityConstructing the limit of functions in $C[a,b]$ with maximum value normIn compact embedding Theorem, $u_0$ lies in $W^1,p(Omega)$?Prove that the space $C^k(barU)$ is Banach.
$begingroup$
Let $OmegasubsetmathbbR^d$ be open, bounded and simply connected with smooth boundary $partialOmega$. Define $mathcalH:=~Delta uin L^2(Omega)$ with norm
$$|u|_mathcalH^2:=|u|_H^1(Omega)^2+|Delta u|_L^2(Omega)^2.$$
I want to show that $H^2(Omega)$ is dense in $mathcalH$ under $|cdot|_mathcalH$.
This means, given $uinmathcalH$ and $varepsilon>0$ I need to find a $u_0in H^2(Omega)$ such that
$$|u-u_0|_H^1(Omega)^2+|Delta u-Delta u_0|_L^2(Omega)^2<varepsilon.$$
Alternatively it means that given a sequence $u_ninH^2(Omega)$ that is Cauchy in $|cdot|_mathcalH$ I need to show that its limit $u$ is in $mathcalH$.
So far I've attempted reasoning as follows:
If $u_n$ is $mathcalH$-Cauchy then also it is $H^1(Omega)$-Cauchy, i.e.,
$$|u_n-u_m|_H^1(Omega)rightarrow0qquad(n,mrightarrowinfty).$$
Hence by completeness there is an $H^1(Omega)$-limit $u$:
$$|u_n-u|_H^1(Omega)rightarrow0qquad(nrightarrowinfty).$$
The issue here is that $Delta u$ is not necessarily defined. One may of course remark that by the same reasoning in the complete space $L^2(Omega)$ the sequence $Delta u_n$ has a limit, say, $y$, in $L^2(Omega)$. But there is no immediate link between $y$ and $u$.
Could one attempt to solve the Dirichlet problem
$$left{beginarrayrclcc
Delta f &=&y&textin&Omega\
f&=&u|_partialOmega&texton&partialOmega
endarrayright.quad?$$
This seems like an incredibly convoluted way to do it, when I feel it should be extremely simple---$H^2(Omega)$ is trivially $H^1$-dense in $H^1(Omega)$.
functional-analysis hilbert-spaces sobolev-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $OmegasubsetmathbbR^d$ be open, bounded and simply connected with smooth boundary $partialOmega$. Define $mathcalH:=~Delta uin L^2(Omega)$ with norm
$$|u|_mathcalH^2:=|u|_H^1(Omega)^2+|Delta u|_L^2(Omega)^2.$$
I want to show that $H^2(Omega)$ is dense in $mathcalH$ under $|cdot|_mathcalH$.
This means, given $uinmathcalH$ and $varepsilon>0$ I need to find a $u_0in H^2(Omega)$ such that
$$|u-u_0|_H^1(Omega)^2+|Delta u-Delta u_0|_L^2(Omega)^2<varepsilon.$$
Alternatively it means that given a sequence $u_ninH^2(Omega)$ that is Cauchy in $|cdot|_mathcalH$ I need to show that its limit $u$ is in $mathcalH$.
So far I've attempted reasoning as follows:
If $u_n$ is $mathcalH$-Cauchy then also it is $H^1(Omega)$-Cauchy, i.e.,
$$|u_n-u_m|_H^1(Omega)rightarrow0qquad(n,mrightarrowinfty).$$
Hence by completeness there is an $H^1(Omega)$-limit $u$:
$$|u_n-u|_H^1(Omega)rightarrow0qquad(nrightarrowinfty).$$
The issue here is that $Delta u$ is not necessarily defined. One may of course remark that by the same reasoning in the complete space $L^2(Omega)$ the sequence $Delta u_n$ has a limit, say, $y$, in $L^2(Omega)$. But there is no immediate link between $y$ and $u$.
Could one attempt to solve the Dirichlet problem
$$left{beginarrayrclcc
Delta f &=&y&textin&Omega\
f&=&u|_partialOmega&texton&partialOmega
endarrayright.quad?$$
This seems like an incredibly convoluted way to do it, when I feel it should be extremely simple---$H^2(Omega)$ is trivially $H^1$-dense in $H^1(Omega)$.
functional-analysis hilbert-spaces sobolev-spaces
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Isn't $C^infty(Omega)$ dense in $mathcal H$? If that is the case then you're done, since $C^inftysubset H^2(Omega)$.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Mar 13 at 10:14
$begingroup$
$C^infty(Omega)$ is dense in $H^1(Omega)$ under the $H^1$-norm. I believe it is dense in $mathcalH$ under the $mathcalH$-norm, but that Laplacian keeps getting in the way of proving it; there's no obvious way to control $|Delta f|_L^2(Omega)$, even if $f$ is smooth.
$endgroup$
– Stromael
Mar 13 at 10:25
$begingroup$
Hum. If $Omega=mathbb R^n$, then $mathcalH$ is exactly equal to $H^2(mathbb R^n)$. The same if we consider functions that vanish on $partial Omega$ with their first derivatives (i.e., $H^2_0(Omega)$). In the general case, there's a boundary term: $$lVert Delta frVert_L^2(Omega)^2=lVert D^2 frVert_L^2(Omega)^2 + sum_ijint_partial Omega(partial_j f partial_i^2 f n_j - partial_j f partial_ipartial_q f n_q), dS.$$You probably know these things already but that's all I can say
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Mar 13 at 10:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $OmegasubsetmathbbR^d$ be open, bounded and simply connected with smooth boundary $partialOmega$. Define $mathcalH:=~Delta uin L^2(Omega)$ with norm
$$|u|_mathcalH^2:=|u|_H^1(Omega)^2+|Delta u|_L^2(Omega)^2.$$
I want to show that $H^2(Omega)$ is dense in $mathcalH$ under $|cdot|_mathcalH$.
This means, given $uinmathcalH$ and $varepsilon>0$ I need to find a $u_0in H^2(Omega)$ such that
$$|u-u_0|_H^1(Omega)^2+|Delta u-Delta u_0|_L^2(Omega)^2<varepsilon.$$
Alternatively it means that given a sequence $u_ninH^2(Omega)$ that is Cauchy in $|cdot|_mathcalH$ I need to show that its limit $u$ is in $mathcalH$.
So far I've attempted reasoning as follows:
If $u_n$ is $mathcalH$-Cauchy then also it is $H^1(Omega)$-Cauchy, i.e.,
$$|u_n-u_m|_H^1(Omega)rightarrow0qquad(n,mrightarrowinfty).$$
Hence by completeness there is an $H^1(Omega)$-limit $u$:
$$|u_n-u|_H^1(Omega)rightarrow0qquad(nrightarrowinfty).$$
The issue here is that $Delta u$ is not necessarily defined. One may of course remark that by the same reasoning in the complete space $L^2(Omega)$ the sequence $Delta u_n$ has a limit, say, $y$, in $L^2(Omega)$. But there is no immediate link between $y$ and $u$.
Could one attempt to solve the Dirichlet problem
$$left{beginarrayrclcc
Delta f &=&y&textin&Omega\
f&=&u|_partialOmega&texton&partialOmega
endarrayright.quad?$$
This seems like an incredibly convoluted way to do it, when I feel it should be extremely simple---$H^2(Omega)$ is trivially $H^1$-dense in $H^1(Omega)$.
functional-analysis hilbert-spaces sobolev-spaces
$endgroup$
Let $OmegasubsetmathbbR^d$ be open, bounded and simply connected with smooth boundary $partialOmega$. Define $mathcalH:=~Delta uin L^2(Omega)$ with norm
$$|u|_mathcalH^2:=|u|_H^1(Omega)^2+|Delta u|_L^2(Omega)^2.$$
I want to show that $H^2(Omega)$ is dense in $mathcalH$ under $|cdot|_mathcalH$.
This means, given $uinmathcalH$ and $varepsilon>0$ I need to find a $u_0in H^2(Omega)$ such that
$$|u-u_0|_H^1(Omega)^2+|Delta u-Delta u_0|_L^2(Omega)^2<varepsilon.$$
Alternatively it means that given a sequence $u_ninH^2(Omega)$ that is Cauchy in $|cdot|_mathcalH$ I need to show that its limit $u$ is in $mathcalH$.
So far I've attempted reasoning as follows:
If $u_n$ is $mathcalH$-Cauchy then also it is $H^1(Omega)$-Cauchy, i.e.,
$$|u_n-u_m|_H^1(Omega)rightarrow0qquad(n,mrightarrowinfty).$$
Hence by completeness there is an $H^1(Omega)$-limit $u$:
$$|u_n-u|_H^1(Omega)rightarrow0qquad(nrightarrowinfty).$$
The issue here is that $Delta u$ is not necessarily defined. One may of course remark that by the same reasoning in the complete space $L^2(Omega)$ the sequence $Delta u_n$ has a limit, say, $y$, in $L^2(Omega)$. But there is no immediate link between $y$ and $u$.
Could one attempt to solve the Dirichlet problem
$$left{beginarrayrclcc
Delta f &=&y&textin&Omega\
f&=&u|_partialOmega&texton&partialOmega
endarrayright.quad?$$
This seems like an incredibly convoluted way to do it, when I feel it should be extremely simple---$H^2(Omega)$ is trivially $H^1$-dense in $H^1(Omega)$.
functional-analysis hilbert-spaces sobolev-spaces
functional-analysis hilbert-spaces sobolev-spaces
asked Mar 13 at 9:53
StromaelStromael
675615
675615
$begingroup$
Isn't $C^infty(Omega)$ dense in $mathcal H$? If that is the case then you're done, since $C^inftysubset H^2(Omega)$.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Mar 13 at 10:14
$begingroup$
$C^infty(Omega)$ is dense in $H^1(Omega)$ under the $H^1$-norm. I believe it is dense in $mathcalH$ under the $mathcalH$-norm, but that Laplacian keeps getting in the way of proving it; there's no obvious way to control $|Delta f|_L^2(Omega)$, even if $f$ is smooth.
$endgroup$
– Stromael
Mar 13 at 10:25
$begingroup$
Hum. If $Omega=mathbb R^n$, then $mathcalH$ is exactly equal to $H^2(mathbb R^n)$. The same if we consider functions that vanish on $partial Omega$ with their first derivatives (i.e., $H^2_0(Omega)$). In the general case, there's a boundary term: $$lVert Delta frVert_L^2(Omega)^2=lVert D^2 frVert_L^2(Omega)^2 + sum_ijint_partial Omega(partial_j f partial_i^2 f n_j - partial_j f partial_ipartial_q f n_q), dS.$$You probably know these things already but that's all I can say
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Mar 13 at 10:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Isn't $C^infty(Omega)$ dense in $mathcal H$? If that is the case then you're done, since $C^inftysubset H^2(Omega)$.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Mar 13 at 10:14
$begingroup$
$C^infty(Omega)$ is dense in $H^1(Omega)$ under the $H^1$-norm. I believe it is dense in $mathcalH$ under the $mathcalH$-norm, but that Laplacian keeps getting in the way of proving it; there's no obvious way to control $|Delta f|_L^2(Omega)$, even if $f$ is smooth.
$endgroup$
– Stromael
Mar 13 at 10:25
$begingroup$
Hum. If $Omega=mathbb R^n$, then $mathcalH$ is exactly equal to $H^2(mathbb R^n)$. The same if we consider functions that vanish on $partial Omega$ with their first derivatives (i.e., $H^2_0(Omega)$). In the general case, there's a boundary term: $$lVert Delta frVert_L^2(Omega)^2=lVert D^2 frVert_L^2(Omega)^2 + sum_ijint_partial Omega(partial_j f partial_i^2 f n_j - partial_j f partial_ipartial_q f n_q), dS.$$You probably know these things already but that's all I can say
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Mar 13 at 10:50
$begingroup$
Isn't $C^infty(Omega)$ dense in $mathcal H$? If that is the case then you're done, since $C^inftysubset H^2(Omega)$.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Mar 13 at 10:14
$begingroup$
Isn't $C^infty(Omega)$ dense in $mathcal H$? If that is the case then you're done, since $C^inftysubset H^2(Omega)$.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Mar 13 at 10:14
$begingroup$
$C^infty(Omega)$ is dense in $H^1(Omega)$ under the $H^1$-norm. I believe it is dense in $mathcalH$ under the $mathcalH$-norm, but that Laplacian keeps getting in the way of proving it; there's no obvious way to control $|Delta f|_L^2(Omega)$, even if $f$ is smooth.
$endgroup$
– Stromael
Mar 13 at 10:25
$begingroup$
$C^infty(Omega)$ is dense in $H^1(Omega)$ under the $H^1$-norm. I believe it is dense in $mathcalH$ under the $mathcalH$-norm, but that Laplacian keeps getting in the way of proving it; there's no obvious way to control $|Delta f|_L^2(Omega)$, even if $f$ is smooth.
$endgroup$
– Stromael
Mar 13 at 10:25
$begingroup$
Hum. If $Omega=mathbb R^n$, then $mathcalH$ is exactly equal to $H^2(mathbb R^n)$. The same if we consider functions that vanish on $partial Omega$ with their first derivatives (i.e., $H^2_0(Omega)$). In the general case, there's a boundary term: $$lVert Delta frVert_L^2(Omega)^2=lVert D^2 frVert_L^2(Omega)^2 + sum_ijint_partial Omega(partial_j f partial_i^2 f n_j - partial_j f partial_ipartial_q f n_q), dS.$$You probably know these things already but that's all I can say
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Mar 13 at 10:50
$begingroup$
Hum. If $Omega=mathbb R^n$, then $mathcalH$ is exactly equal to $H^2(mathbb R^n)$. The same if we consider functions that vanish on $partial Omega$ with their first derivatives (i.e., $H^2_0(Omega)$). In the general case, there's a boundary term: $$lVert Delta frVert_L^2(Omega)^2=lVert D^2 frVert_L^2(Omega)^2 + sum_ijint_partial Omega(partial_j f partial_i^2 f n_j - partial_j f partial_ipartial_q f n_q), dS.$$You probably know these things already but that's all I can say
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Mar 13 at 10:50
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146343%2fdensity-of-a-subspace%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3146343%2fdensity-of-a-subspace%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Isn't $C^infty(Omega)$ dense in $mathcal H$? If that is the case then you're done, since $C^inftysubset H^2(Omega)$.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Mar 13 at 10:14
$begingroup$
$C^infty(Omega)$ is dense in $H^1(Omega)$ under the $H^1$-norm. I believe it is dense in $mathcalH$ under the $mathcalH$-norm, but that Laplacian keeps getting in the way of proving it; there's no obvious way to control $|Delta f|_L^2(Omega)$, even if $f$ is smooth.
$endgroup$
– Stromael
Mar 13 at 10:25
$begingroup$
Hum. If $Omega=mathbb R^n$, then $mathcalH$ is exactly equal to $H^2(mathbb R^n)$. The same if we consider functions that vanish on $partial Omega$ with their first derivatives (i.e., $H^2_0(Omega)$). In the general case, there's a boundary term: $$lVert Delta frVert_L^2(Omega)^2=lVert D^2 frVert_L^2(Omega)^2 + sum_ijint_partial Omega(partial_j f partial_i^2 f n_j - partial_j f partial_ipartial_q f n_q), dS.$$You probably know these things already but that's all I can say
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Mar 13 at 10:50