Using Archimedian property to prove that infimum of set is $0$Proof that the infimum of a given set $E$ is uniqueQuick question about Archimedian propertyFinding the infimum of a set of real numbersInfimum of $S = x, y in mathbbN$ using archimedean propertyRigorously proving infimum of a set.Approximation Property for InfimumIf $A$ is an ordered set has the Least upper bound property iff it has the greatest lower bound property.Proof of least upper bound and greatest lower bound property of an ordered setProving an infimum using the archimedean property of RTo prove that $ cap_n=1^infty (0 , frac1n) = emptyset $

XeLaTeX and pdfLaTeX ignore hyphenation

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Suffixes -unt and -ut-

Is there really no realistic way for a skeleton monster to move around without magic?

Has the BBC provided arguments for saying Brexit being cancelled is unlikely?

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?

Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?

A function which translates a sentence to title-case

Is the month field really deprecated?

"which" command doesn't work / path of Safari?

Representing power series as a function - what to do with the constant after integration?

Underlining section titles

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

How can I hide my bitcoin transactions to protect anonymity from others?

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

How to get the available space of $HOME as a variable in shell scripting?

Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

If Manufacturer spice model and Datasheet give different values which should I use?



Using Archimedian property to prove that infimum of set is $0$


Proof that the infimum of a given set $E$ is uniqueQuick question about Archimedian propertyFinding the infimum of a set of real numbersInfimum of $S = fracx2^y $ using archimedean propertyRigorously proving infimum of a set.Approximation Property for InfimumIf $A$ is an ordered set has the Least upper bound property iff it has the greatest lower bound property.Proof of least upper bound and greatest lower bound property of an ordered setProving an infimum using the archimedean property of RTo prove that $ cap_n=1^infty (0 , frac1n) = emptyset $













1












$begingroup$


Given set A = [ $frac1n | n in mathbbN$]



It seems to me i have to prove two things :



  1. $frac1n geq 0 , forall n in mathbbN$

2, Assuming $b$ be another lower bound , and so $b leq 0$



Work :



1 Now $frac1n geq 0 , forall n in N$



Also $n geq 1$



So $frac1n leq 1$ . But $frac1n in R^+$. So, $0 < frac1n leq
1$



  1. Assume that $b > 0$

so by Archimedian property $exists n in mathbbN$
such that $frac1n < b$ which is contradiction to the fact that b is lower bound for the set



Is this correct ?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    Given set A = [ $frac1n | n in mathbbN$]



    It seems to me i have to prove two things :



    1. $frac1n geq 0 , forall n in mathbbN$

    2, Assuming $b$ be another lower bound , and so $b leq 0$



    Work :



    1 Now $frac1n geq 0 , forall n in N$



    Also $n geq 1$



    So $frac1n leq 1$ . But $frac1n in R^+$. So, $0 < frac1n leq
    1$



    1. Assume that $b > 0$

    so by Archimedian property $exists n in mathbbN$
    such that $frac1n < b$ which is contradiction to the fact that b is lower bound for the set



    Is this correct ?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Given set A = [ $frac1n | n in mathbbN$]



      It seems to me i have to prove two things :



      1. $frac1n geq 0 , forall n in mathbbN$

      2, Assuming $b$ be another lower bound , and so $b leq 0$



      Work :



      1 Now $frac1n geq 0 , forall n in N$



      Also $n geq 1$



      So $frac1n leq 1$ . But $frac1n in R^+$. So, $0 < frac1n leq
      1$



      1. Assume that $b > 0$

      so by Archimedian property $exists n in mathbbN$
      such that $frac1n < b$ which is contradiction to the fact that b is lower bound for the set



      Is this correct ?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Given set A = [ $frac1n | n in mathbbN$]



      It seems to me i have to prove two things :



      1. $frac1n geq 0 , forall n in mathbbN$

      2, Assuming $b$ be another lower bound , and so $b leq 0$



      Work :



      1 Now $frac1n geq 0 , forall n in N$



      Also $n geq 1$



      So $frac1n leq 1$ . But $frac1n in R^+$. So, $0 < frac1n leq
      1$



      1. Assume that $b > 0$

      so by Archimedian property $exists n in mathbbN$
      such that $frac1n < b$ which is contradiction to the fact that b is lower bound for the set



      Is this correct ?







      real-analysis proof-verification self-learning






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 22 at 9:04







      J. Deff

















      asked Mar 22 at 8:04









      J. DeffJ. Deff

      717519




      717519




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          $0$ is a lower bound, $ 1/n >0$, $n in mathbbZ^+$.



          Assume $b >0$, real, is a lower bound.



          Archimedean principle:



          There is a $n_0 in mathbbZ^+$ s.t.



          $n_0 >1/b$, i.e.



          $b > 1/n_0$, a contradiction(Why?).



          Hence $inf (A)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            please check my attempt
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 8:42










          • $begingroup$
            J.Deff.I 1/n >0, 0 is a lower bound.Ok?To show that 0 is the greatest lower bound you assume a lower bound b that is bigger. 0< 1/n, and assuming it is not the greatesower bound you pick b >0 , and contradict.You choose b<0, a smaller lower bound. b <0 <1/n automatically.Let me know.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Szilas
            Mar 22 at 8:50










          • $begingroup$
            Check my proof now please and let me know
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 9:09










          • $begingroup$
            Deff.You got it. I would put in an extra line, Archimedean principle: There is a n >1/b ( real).Then b >1/n, i.e. a little more explicit on the Arch.principle.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Szilas
            Mar 22 at 9:16


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Observe that 0 is a lower bound of $frac1n$
          Archimedian property- if $x > 0 $ then there exists $n epsilon mathbbR $ such that $nx > y; x,y epsilon mathbbR$. Set $x = epsilon$ and $y=1$ $$ epsilon > frac1n forall epsilon > 0$$ . Hence infimum of $frac1n $ is $0$ .






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I dont understand this version of archimedian property.I have following version which is :...Given there is any rela number b then there exists some natural number n such that $n > b$
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 8:31











          • $begingroup$
            Just search archimedian property for real nos. on Google. You'll get this version of archimedian property.
            $endgroup$
            – Prakhar Neema
            Mar 22 at 8:45











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157870%2fusing-archimedian-property-to-prove-that-infimum-of-set-is-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          $0$ is a lower bound, $ 1/n >0$, $n in mathbbZ^+$.



          Assume $b >0$, real, is a lower bound.



          Archimedean principle:



          There is a $n_0 in mathbbZ^+$ s.t.



          $n_0 >1/b$, i.e.



          $b > 1/n_0$, a contradiction(Why?).



          Hence $inf (A)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            please check my attempt
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 8:42










          • $begingroup$
            J.Deff.I 1/n >0, 0 is a lower bound.Ok?To show that 0 is the greatest lower bound you assume a lower bound b that is bigger. 0< 1/n, and assuming it is not the greatesower bound you pick b >0 , and contradict.You choose b<0, a smaller lower bound. b <0 <1/n automatically.Let me know.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Szilas
            Mar 22 at 8:50










          • $begingroup$
            Check my proof now please and let me know
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 9:09










          • $begingroup$
            Deff.You got it. I would put in an extra line, Archimedean principle: There is a n >1/b ( real).Then b >1/n, i.e. a little more explicit on the Arch.principle.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Szilas
            Mar 22 at 9:16















          1












          $begingroup$

          $0$ is a lower bound, $ 1/n >0$, $n in mathbbZ^+$.



          Assume $b >0$, real, is a lower bound.



          Archimedean principle:



          There is a $n_0 in mathbbZ^+$ s.t.



          $n_0 >1/b$, i.e.



          $b > 1/n_0$, a contradiction(Why?).



          Hence $inf (A)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            please check my attempt
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 8:42










          • $begingroup$
            J.Deff.I 1/n >0, 0 is a lower bound.Ok?To show that 0 is the greatest lower bound you assume a lower bound b that is bigger. 0< 1/n, and assuming it is not the greatesower bound you pick b >0 , and contradict.You choose b<0, a smaller lower bound. b <0 <1/n automatically.Let me know.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Szilas
            Mar 22 at 8:50










          • $begingroup$
            Check my proof now please and let me know
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 9:09










          • $begingroup$
            Deff.You got it. I would put in an extra line, Archimedean principle: There is a n >1/b ( real).Then b >1/n, i.e. a little more explicit on the Arch.principle.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Szilas
            Mar 22 at 9:16













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          $0$ is a lower bound, $ 1/n >0$, $n in mathbbZ^+$.



          Assume $b >0$, real, is a lower bound.



          Archimedean principle:



          There is a $n_0 in mathbbZ^+$ s.t.



          $n_0 >1/b$, i.e.



          $b > 1/n_0$, a contradiction(Why?).



          Hence $inf (A)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          $0$ is a lower bound, $ 1/n >0$, $n in mathbbZ^+$.



          Assume $b >0$, real, is a lower bound.



          Archimedean principle:



          There is a $n_0 in mathbbZ^+$ s.t.



          $n_0 >1/b$, i.e.



          $b > 1/n_0$, a contradiction(Why?).



          Hence $inf (A)=0$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 22 at 8:43

























          answered Mar 22 at 8:37









          Peter SzilasPeter Szilas

          11.8k2822




          11.8k2822











          • $begingroup$
            please check my attempt
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 8:42










          • $begingroup$
            J.Deff.I 1/n >0, 0 is a lower bound.Ok?To show that 0 is the greatest lower bound you assume a lower bound b that is bigger. 0< 1/n, and assuming it is not the greatesower bound you pick b >0 , and contradict.You choose b<0, a smaller lower bound. b <0 <1/n automatically.Let me know.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Szilas
            Mar 22 at 8:50










          • $begingroup$
            Check my proof now please and let me know
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 9:09










          • $begingroup$
            Deff.You got it. I would put in an extra line, Archimedean principle: There is a n >1/b ( real).Then b >1/n, i.e. a little more explicit on the Arch.principle.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Szilas
            Mar 22 at 9:16
















          • $begingroup$
            please check my attempt
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 8:42










          • $begingroup$
            J.Deff.I 1/n >0, 0 is a lower bound.Ok?To show that 0 is the greatest lower bound you assume a lower bound b that is bigger. 0< 1/n, and assuming it is not the greatesower bound you pick b >0 , and contradict.You choose b<0, a smaller lower bound. b <0 <1/n automatically.Let me know.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Szilas
            Mar 22 at 8:50










          • $begingroup$
            Check my proof now please and let me know
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 9:09










          • $begingroup$
            Deff.You got it. I would put in an extra line, Archimedean principle: There is a n >1/b ( real).Then b >1/n, i.e. a little more explicit on the Arch.principle.
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Szilas
            Mar 22 at 9:16















          $begingroup$
          please check my attempt
          $endgroup$
          – J. Deff
          Mar 22 at 8:42




          $begingroup$
          please check my attempt
          $endgroup$
          – J. Deff
          Mar 22 at 8:42












          $begingroup$
          J.Deff.I 1/n >0, 0 is a lower bound.Ok?To show that 0 is the greatest lower bound you assume a lower bound b that is bigger. 0< 1/n, and assuming it is not the greatesower bound you pick b >0 , and contradict.You choose b<0, a smaller lower bound. b <0 <1/n automatically.Let me know.
          $endgroup$
          – Peter Szilas
          Mar 22 at 8:50




          $begingroup$
          J.Deff.I 1/n >0, 0 is a lower bound.Ok?To show that 0 is the greatest lower bound you assume a lower bound b that is bigger. 0< 1/n, and assuming it is not the greatesower bound you pick b >0 , and contradict.You choose b<0, a smaller lower bound. b <0 <1/n automatically.Let me know.
          $endgroup$
          – Peter Szilas
          Mar 22 at 8:50












          $begingroup$
          Check my proof now please and let me know
          $endgroup$
          – J. Deff
          Mar 22 at 9:09




          $begingroup$
          Check my proof now please and let me know
          $endgroup$
          – J. Deff
          Mar 22 at 9:09












          $begingroup$
          Deff.You got it. I would put in an extra line, Archimedean principle: There is a n >1/b ( real).Then b >1/n, i.e. a little more explicit on the Arch.principle.
          $endgroup$
          – Peter Szilas
          Mar 22 at 9:16




          $begingroup$
          Deff.You got it. I would put in an extra line, Archimedean principle: There is a n >1/b ( real).Then b >1/n, i.e. a little more explicit on the Arch.principle.
          $endgroup$
          – Peter Szilas
          Mar 22 at 9:16











          1












          $begingroup$

          Observe that 0 is a lower bound of $frac1n$
          Archimedian property- if $x > 0 $ then there exists $n epsilon mathbbR $ such that $nx > y; x,y epsilon mathbbR$. Set $x = epsilon$ and $y=1$ $$ epsilon > frac1n forall epsilon > 0$$ . Hence infimum of $frac1n $ is $0$ .






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I dont understand this version of archimedian property.I have following version which is :...Given there is any rela number b then there exists some natural number n such that $n > b$
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 8:31











          • $begingroup$
            Just search archimedian property for real nos. on Google. You'll get this version of archimedian property.
            $endgroup$
            – Prakhar Neema
            Mar 22 at 8:45















          1












          $begingroup$

          Observe that 0 is a lower bound of $frac1n$
          Archimedian property- if $x > 0 $ then there exists $n epsilon mathbbR $ such that $nx > y; x,y epsilon mathbbR$. Set $x = epsilon$ and $y=1$ $$ epsilon > frac1n forall epsilon > 0$$ . Hence infimum of $frac1n $ is $0$ .






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I dont understand this version of archimedian property.I have following version which is :...Given there is any rela number b then there exists some natural number n such that $n > b$
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 8:31











          • $begingroup$
            Just search archimedian property for real nos. on Google. You'll get this version of archimedian property.
            $endgroup$
            – Prakhar Neema
            Mar 22 at 8:45













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Observe that 0 is a lower bound of $frac1n$
          Archimedian property- if $x > 0 $ then there exists $n epsilon mathbbR $ such that $nx > y; x,y epsilon mathbbR$. Set $x = epsilon$ and $y=1$ $$ epsilon > frac1n forall epsilon > 0$$ . Hence infimum of $frac1n $ is $0$ .






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Observe that 0 is a lower bound of $frac1n$
          Archimedian property- if $x > 0 $ then there exists $n epsilon mathbbR $ such that $nx > y; x,y epsilon mathbbR$. Set $x = epsilon$ and $y=1$ $$ epsilon > frac1n forall epsilon > 0$$ . Hence infimum of $frac1n $ is $0$ .







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 22 at 8:42

























          answered Mar 22 at 8:21









          Prakhar NeemaPrakhar Neema

          1174




          1174











          • $begingroup$
            I dont understand this version of archimedian property.I have following version which is :...Given there is any rela number b then there exists some natural number n such that $n > b$
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 8:31











          • $begingroup$
            Just search archimedian property for real nos. on Google. You'll get this version of archimedian property.
            $endgroup$
            – Prakhar Neema
            Mar 22 at 8:45
















          • $begingroup$
            I dont understand this version of archimedian property.I have following version which is :...Given there is any rela number b then there exists some natural number n such that $n > b$
            $endgroup$
            – J. Deff
            Mar 22 at 8:31











          • $begingroup$
            Just search archimedian property for real nos. on Google. You'll get this version of archimedian property.
            $endgroup$
            – Prakhar Neema
            Mar 22 at 8:45















          $begingroup$
          I dont understand this version of archimedian property.I have following version which is :...Given there is any rela number b then there exists some natural number n such that $n > b$
          $endgroup$
          – J. Deff
          Mar 22 at 8:31





          $begingroup$
          I dont understand this version of archimedian property.I have following version which is :...Given there is any rela number b then there exists some natural number n such that $n > b$
          $endgroup$
          – J. Deff
          Mar 22 at 8:31













          $begingroup$
          Just search archimedian property for real nos. on Google. You'll get this version of archimedian property.
          $endgroup$
          – Prakhar Neema
          Mar 22 at 8:45




          $begingroup$
          Just search archimedian property for real nos. on Google. You'll get this version of archimedian property.
          $endgroup$
          – Prakhar Neema
          Mar 22 at 8:45

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157870%2fusing-archimedian-property-to-prove-that-infimum-of-set-is-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

          Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?

          Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576