Finding the fundamental solution of an ODEGlobal solution for ODEHelp finding the particular solution of a 2nd order ODEODE time of life of a solutionNature of solution of ODE.General solution to ODEGeneral Solution of an ODESolution of first order nonlinear ODEHomogeneous second-order ODE with non-constant coefficientsLinear second order ODE, how model parameters change the solution?

Why CLRS example on residual networks does not follows its formula?

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

What exactly is the parasitic white layer that forms after iron parts are treated with ammonia?

Draw simple lines in Inkscape

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?

Why is this code 6.5x slower with optimizations enabled?

What is the logic behind how bash tests for true/false?

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Why don't electromagnetic waves interact with each other?

Patience, young "Padovan"

How can I hide my bitcoin transactions to protect anonymity from others?

Japan - Plan around max visa duration

What Brexit solution does the DUP want?

How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

Pronouncing Dictionary.com's W.O.D "vade mecum" in English

Motorized valve interfering with button?

Example of a relative pronoun

Copycat chess is back

Compute hash value according to multiplication method

The use of multiple foreign keys on same column in SQL Server

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?



Finding the fundamental solution of an ODE


Global solution for ODEHelp finding the particular solution of a 2nd order ODEODE time of life of a solutionNature of solution of ODE.General solution to ODEGeneral Solution of an ODESolution of first order nonlinear ODEHomogeneous second-order ODE with non-constant coefficientsLinear second order ODE, how model parameters change the solution?













0












$begingroup$


I want to find the fundamental solution of this ODE:
$$- u^primeprime + k^2 u=0, -infty<x<infty, kneq 0$$
I know that it is:
$$Gamma(x,epsilon) = frace^k2k$$, but I don’t know how to obtain it.



We know that for $xneq epsilon$
$$-Gamma^primeprime(x,epsilon) + k^2 Gamma(x,epsilon) =0$$, so we can say that for $xneq epsilon$
We have:
$$ Gamma(x,epsilon) = Ae^k(x-epsilon) + Be^-k(x-epsilon)$$
Can anyone please show me how can I compute A and B?



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    $e^k$ is not a solution. By the way, why did you drop $u$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 22 at 9:03











  • $begingroup$
    $$u(x)=c_1e^kx+c_2e^-kx$$
    $endgroup$
    – JJacquelin
    Mar 22 at 9:09










  • $begingroup$
    Your function is a solution to $-u''+k^2u=delta(x-ϵ)$ with the Dirac-delta distribution, otherwise connected to the concept of a Green's function. If you could provide more context on what you want to use this function for?
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 22 at 11:36










  • $begingroup$
    You get a solution for $x<ϵ$, one for $x>ϵ$, both bounded, and have to connect them so that $u'(x)$ has a jump of height 1 at $x=ϵ$. This gives exactly your function.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 22 at 12:43










  • $begingroup$
    Could you cite your definition of "fundamental solution"? I can guess, but for an answer I'd like to be certain. Note that the fundamental or Wronskian matrix of the associated first order system might also sometimes be called fundamental solution.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 22 at 14:26
















0












$begingroup$


I want to find the fundamental solution of this ODE:
$$- u^primeprime + k^2 u=0, -infty<x<infty, kneq 0$$
I know that it is:
$$Gamma(x,epsilon) = frace^k2k$$, but I don’t know how to obtain it.



We know that for $xneq epsilon$
$$-Gamma^primeprime(x,epsilon) + k^2 Gamma(x,epsilon) =0$$, so we can say that for $xneq epsilon$
We have:
$$ Gamma(x,epsilon) = Ae^k(x-epsilon) + Be^-k(x-epsilon)$$
Can anyone please show me how can I compute A and B?



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    $e^k$ is not a solution. By the way, why did you drop $u$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 22 at 9:03











  • $begingroup$
    $$u(x)=c_1e^kx+c_2e^-kx$$
    $endgroup$
    – JJacquelin
    Mar 22 at 9:09










  • $begingroup$
    Your function is a solution to $-u''+k^2u=delta(x-ϵ)$ with the Dirac-delta distribution, otherwise connected to the concept of a Green's function. If you could provide more context on what you want to use this function for?
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 22 at 11:36










  • $begingroup$
    You get a solution for $x<ϵ$, one for $x>ϵ$, both bounded, and have to connect them so that $u'(x)$ has a jump of height 1 at $x=ϵ$. This gives exactly your function.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 22 at 12:43










  • $begingroup$
    Could you cite your definition of "fundamental solution"? I can guess, but for an answer I'd like to be certain. Note that the fundamental or Wronskian matrix of the associated first order system might also sometimes be called fundamental solution.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 22 at 14:26














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I want to find the fundamental solution of this ODE:
$$- u^primeprime + k^2 u=0, -infty<x<infty, kneq 0$$
I know that it is:
$$Gamma(x,epsilon) = frace^k2k$$, but I don’t know how to obtain it.



We know that for $xneq epsilon$
$$-Gamma^primeprime(x,epsilon) + k^2 Gamma(x,epsilon) =0$$, so we can say that for $xneq epsilon$
We have:
$$ Gamma(x,epsilon) = Ae^k(x-epsilon) + Be^-k(x-epsilon)$$
Can anyone please show me how can I compute A and B?



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I want to find the fundamental solution of this ODE:
$$- u^primeprime + k^2 u=0, -infty<x<infty, kneq 0$$
I know that it is:
$$Gamma(x,epsilon) = frace^k2k$$, but I don’t know how to obtain it.



We know that for $xneq epsilon$
$$-Gamma^primeprime(x,epsilon) + k^2 Gamma(x,epsilon) =0$$, so we can say that for $xneq epsilon$
We have:
$$ Gamma(x,epsilon) = Ae^k(x-epsilon) + Be^-k(x-epsilon)$$
Can anyone please show me how can I compute A and B?



Thanks.







ordinary-differential-equations greens-function






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Mar 22 at 8:56









Math12Math12

629




629











  • $begingroup$
    $e^k$ is not a solution. By the way, why did you drop $u$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 22 at 9:03











  • $begingroup$
    $$u(x)=c_1e^kx+c_2e^-kx$$
    $endgroup$
    – JJacquelin
    Mar 22 at 9:09










  • $begingroup$
    Your function is a solution to $-u''+k^2u=delta(x-ϵ)$ with the Dirac-delta distribution, otherwise connected to the concept of a Green's function. If you could provide more context on what you want to use this function for?
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 22 at 11:36










  • $begingroup$
    You get a solution for $x<ϵ$, one for $x>ϵ$, both bounded, and have to connect them so that $u'(x)$ has a jump of height 1 at $x=ϵ$. This gives exactly your function.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 22 at 12:43










  • $begingroup$
    Could you cite your definition of "fundamental solution"? I can guess, but for an answer I'd like to be certain. Note that the fundamental or Wronskian matrix of the associated first order system might also sometimes be called fundamental solution.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 22 at 14:26

















  • $begingroup$
    $e^k$ is not a solution. By the way, why did you drop $u$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 22 at 9:03











  • $begingroup$
    $$u(x)=c_1e^kx+c_2e^-kx$$
    $endgroup$
    – JJacquelin
    Mar 22 at 9:09










  • $begingroup$
    Your function is a solution to $-u''+k^2u=delta(x-ϵ)$ with the Dirac-delta distribution, otherwise connected to the concept of a Green's function. If you could provide more context on what you want to use this function for?
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 22 at 11:36










  • $begingroup$
    You get a solution for $x<ϵ$, one for $x>ϵ$, both bounded, and have to connect them so that $u'(x)$ has a jump of height 1 at $x=ϵ$. This gives exactly your function.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 22 at 12:43










  • $begingroup$
    Could you cite your definition of "fundamental solution"? I can guess, but for an answer I'd like to be certain. Note that the fundamental or Wronskian matrix of the associated first order system might also sometimes be called fundamental solution.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Mar 22 at 14:26
















$begingroup$
$e^k$ is not a solution. By the way, why did you drop $u$ ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Mar 22 at 9:03





$begingroup$
$e^k$ is not a solution. By the way, why did you drop $u$ ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Mar 22 at 9:03













$begingroup$
$$u(x)=c_1e^kx+c_2e^-kx$$
$endgroup$
– JJacquelin
Mar 22 at 9:09




$begingroup$
$$u(x)=c_1e^kx+c_2e^-kx$$
$endgroup$
– JJacquelin
Mar 22 at 9:09












$begingroup$
Your function is a solution to $-u''+k^2u=delta(x-ϵ)$ with the Dirac-delta distribution, otherwise connected to the concept of a Green's function. If you could provide more context on what you want to use this function for?
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Mar 22 at 11:36




$begingroup$
Your function is a solution to $-u''+k^2u=delta(x-ϵ)$ with the Dirac-delta distribution, otherwise connected to the concept of a Green's function. If you could provide more context on what you want to use this function for?
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Mar 22 at 11:36












$begingroup$
You get a solution for $x<ϵ$, one for $x>ϵ$, both bounded, and have to connect them so that $u'(x)$ has a jump of height 1 at $x=ϵ$. This gives exactly your function.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Mar 22 at 12:43




$begingroup$
You get a solution for $x<ϵ$, one for $x>ϵ$, both bounded, and have to connect them so that $u'(x)$ has a jump of height 1 at $x=ϵ$. This gives exactly your function.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Mar 22 at 12:43












$begingroup$
Could you cite your definition of "fundamental solution"? I can guess, but for an answer I'd like to be certain. Note that the fundamental or Wronskian matrix of the associated first order system might also sometimes be called fundamental solution.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Mar 22 at 14:26





$begingroup$
Could you cite your definition of "fundamental solution"? I can guess, but for an answer I'd like to be certain. Note that the fundamental or Wronskian matrix of the associated first order system might also sometimes be called fundamental solution.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Mar 22 at 14:26











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

This does look like an exercise from an homework... anyway, just some tips: the reasoning you do is correct, $Gamma(x,epsilon)$ indeed is a linear combination of $e^k(x-epsilon)$ and $e^-k(x-epsilon)$ away from $x=epsilon$. However, one must remember that $Gamma$ is not differentiable for $x=epsilon$, so you should expect the general form of $Gamma$ to be
$$
Gamma(x,epsilon)=
begincases
A e^k(x-epsilon)+B e^-k(x-epsilon) & x<epsilon,,
\
C e^k(x-epsilon)+D e^-k(x-epsilon) & x>epsilon,.
endcases
$$

To find the coefficients $A,B,C,DinmathbbR$, you need to use the definition of fundamental solution. Namely, for any test function $varphiinmathcalC_c^infty(mathbbR)$ it must hold
beginequation
varphi(epsilon),=,int_-infty^inftyGamma(x-epsilon)left[-varphi''(x)+k^2varphi(x)right],dx,.
endequation

Split the integral on the right hand side into two parts (from $-infty$ to $epsilon-delta$ and from $epsilon+delta$ to $+infty$, with $delta>0$ small number that you will eventually send to zero) and integrate by parts a couple of time. You will be left with some boundary terms. Impose that these boundary terms equal $varphi(epsilon)$ at the limit $deltato 0$ and you will find some conditions on your coefficients $A,B,C,D$. As LutzL mentioned, at the end you will find that these conditions force $Gamma,'(x-epsilon)$ to have a jump of height $1$ at $x=epsilon$.
Also, the coefficients $A,B,C,D$ will not (and cannot) be completely fixed, but you will have some freedom in their choice, due to the fact that the fundamental solution is not uniquely determined (if $Gamma$ is a fundamental solution, then $Gamma+h$ is also a fundamental solution for any function $h$ such that $-h''+k^2 h=0$).



Good luck!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    Write



    $$u'u''=k^2uu'$$ and integrate to get



    $$u'^2=k^2u^2pm c^2.$$



    This is a separable equation,



    $$fracu'sqrtdfrack^2c^2u^2pm1=c^2$$



    which integrates as



    $$frac cktextarcoshfrackuc=pm cx+c'$$ or



    $$frac cktextarsinhfrackuc=pm cx+c'.$$



    Finally,



    $$u=frac ckcosh(pm kx+c'')$$ or



    $$u=frac cksinh(pm kx+c'').$$



    You can convince yourself that this covers all cases of



    $$ae^kx+be^-kx.$$




    Needless to say, by the theory of linear ODE with constant coefficients, the solution is an arbitrary linear combination of exponentials with parameters equal to the roots of the characteristic equation



    $$lambda^2-k^2=0.$$




    As you are looking for the fundamental solution, $a$ and $b$ remain free parameters.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157913%2ffinding-the-fundamental-solution-of-an-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      This does look like an exercise from an homework... anyway, just some tips: the reasoning you do is correct, $Gamma(x,epsilon)$ indeed is a linear combination of $e^k(x-epsilon)$ and $e^-k(x-epsilon)$ away from $x=epsilon$. However, one must remember that $Gamma$ is not differentiable for $x=epsilon$, so you should expect the general form of $Gamma$ to be
      $$
      Gamma(x,epsilon)=
      begincases
      A e^k(x-epsilon)+B e^-k(x-epsilon) & x<epsilon,,
      \
      C e^k(x-epsilon)+D e^-k(x-epsilon) & x>epsilon,.
      endcases
      $$

      To find the coefficients $A,B,C,DinmathbbR$, you need to use the definition of fundamental solution. Namely, for any test function $varphiinmathcalC_c^infty(mathbbR)$ it must hold
      beginequation
      varphi(epsilon),=,int_-infty^inftyGamma(x-epsilon)left[-varphi''(x)+k^2varphi(x)right],dx,.
      endequation

      Split the integral on the right hand side into two parts (from $-infty$ to $epsilon-delta$ and from $epsilon+delta$ to $+infty$, with $delta>0$ small number that you will eventually send to zero) and integrate by parts a couple of time. You will be left with some boundary terms. Impose that these boundary terms equal $varphi(epsilon)$ at the limit $deltato 0$ and you will find some conditions on your coefficients $A,B,C,D$. As LutzL mentioned, at the end you will find that these conditions force $Gamma,'(x-epsilon)$ to have a jump of height $1$ at $x=epsilon$.
      Also, the coefficients $A,B,C,D$ will not (and cannot) be completely fixed, but you will have some freedom in their choice, due to the fact that the fundamental solution is not uniquely determined (if $Gamma$ is a fundamental solution, then $Gamma+h$ is also a fundamental solution for any function $h$ such that $-h''+k^2 h=0$).



      Good luck!






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        1












        $begingroup$

        This does look like an exercise from an homework... anyway, just some tips: the reasoning you do is correct, $Gamma(x,epsilon)$ indeed is a linear combination of $e^k(x-epsilon)$ and $e^-k(x-epsilon)$ away from $x=epsilon$. However, one must remember that $Gamma$ is not differentiable for $x=epsilon$, so you should expect the general form of $Gamma$ to be
        $$
        Gamma(x,epsilon)=
        begincases
        A e^k(x-epsilon)+B e^-k(x-epsilon) & x<epsilon,,
        \
        C e^k(x-epsilon)+D e^-k(x-epsilon) & x>epsilon,.
        endcases
        $$

        To find the coefficients $A,B,C,DinmathbbR$, you need to use the definition of fundamental solution. Namely, for any test function $varphiinmathcalC_c^infty(mathbbR)$ it must hold
        beginequation
        varphi(epsilon),=,int_-infty^inftyGamma(x-epsilon)left[-varphi''(x)+k^2varphi(x)right],dx,.
        endequation

        Split the integral on the right hand side into two parts (from $-infty$ to $epsilon-delta$ and from $epsilon+delta$ to $+infty$, with $delta>0$ small number that you will eventually send to zero) and integrate by parts a couple of time. You will be left with some boundary terms. Impose that these boundary terms equal $varphi(epsilon)$ at the limit $deltato 0$ and you will find some conditions on your coefficients $A,B,C,D$. As LutzL mentioned, at the end you will find that these conditions force $Gamma,'(x-epsilon)$ to have a jump of height $1$ at $x=epsilon$.
        Also, the coefficients $A,B,C,D$ will not (and cannot) be completely fixed, but you will have some freedom in their choice, due to the fact that the fundamental solution is not uniquely determined (if $Gamma$ is a fundamental solution, then $Gamma+h$ is also a fundamental solution for any function $h$ such that $-h''+k^2 h=0$).



        Good luck!






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          This does look like an exercise from an homework... anyway, just some tips: the reasoning you do is correct, $Gamma(x,epsilon)$ indeed is a linear combination of $e^k(x-epsilon)$ and $e^-k(x-epsilon)$ away from $x=epsilon$. However, one must remember that $Gamma$ is not differentiable for $x=epsilon$, so you should expect the general form of $Gamma$ to be
          $$
          Gamma(x,epsilon)=
          begincases
          A e^k(x-epsilon)+B e^-k(x-epsilon) & x<epsilon,,
          \
          C e^k(x-epsilon)+D e^-k(x-epsilon) & x>epsilon,.
          endcases
          $$

          To find the coefficients $A,B,C,DinmathbbR$, you need to use the definition of fundamental solution. Namely, for any test function $varphiinmathcalC_c^infty(mathbbR)$ it must hold
          beginequation
          varphi(epsilon),=,int_-infty^inftyGamma(x-epsilon)left[-varphi''(x)+k^2varphi(x)right],dx,.
          endequation

          Split the integral on the right hand side into two parts (from $-infty$ to $epsilon-delta$ and from $epsilon+delta$ to $+infty$, with $delta>0$ small number that you will eventually send to zero) and integrate by parts a couple of time. You will be left with some boundary terms. Impose that these boundary terms equal $varphi(epsilon)$ at the limit $deltato 0$ and you will find some conditions on your coefficients $A,B,C,D$. As LutzL mentioned, at the end you will find that these conditions force $Gamma,'(x-epsilon)$ to have a jump of height $1$ at $x=epsilon$.
          Also, the coefficients $A,B,C,D$ will not (and cannot) be completely fixed, but you will have some freedom in their choice, due to the fact that the fundamental solution is not uniquely determined (if $Gamma$ is a fundamental solution, then $Gamma+h$ is also a fundamental solution for any function $h$ such that $-h''+k^2 h=0$).



          Good luck!






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          This does look like an exercise from an homework... anyway, just some tips: the reasoning you do is correct, $Gamma(x,epsilon)$ indeed is a linear combination of $e^k(x-epsilon)$ and $e^-k(x-epsilon)$ away from $x=epsilon$. However, one must remember that $Gamma$ is not differentiable for $x=epsilon$, so you should expect the general form of $Gamma$ to be
          $$
          Gamma(x,epsilon)=
          begincases
          A e^k(x-epsilon)+B e^-k(x-epsilon) & x<epsilon,,
          \
          C e^k(x-epsilon)+D e^-k(x-epsilon) & x>epsilon,.
          endcases
          $$

          To find the coefficients $A,B,C,DinmathbbR$, you need to use the definition of fundamental solution. Namely, for any test function $varphiinmathcalC_c^infty(mathbbR)$ it must hold
          beginequation
          varphi(epsilon),=,int_-infty^inftyGamma(x-epsilon)left[-varphi''(x)+k^2varphi(x)right],dx,.
          endequation

          Split the integral on the right hand side into two parts (from $-infty$ to $epsilon-delta$ and from $epsilon+delta$ to $+infty$, with $delta>0$ small number that you will eventually send to zero) and integrate by parts a couple of time. You will be left with some boundary terms. Impose that these boundary terms equal $varphi(epsilon)$ at the limit $deltato 0$ and you will find some conditions on your coefficients $A,B,C,D$. As LutzL mentioned, at the end you will find that these conditions force $Gamma,'(x-epsilon)$ to have a jump of height $1$ at $x=epsilon$.
          Also, the coefficients $A,B,C,D$ will not (and cannot) be completely fixed, but you will have some freedom in their choice, due to the fact that the fundamental solution is not uniquely determined (if $Gamma$ is a fundamental solution, then $Gamma+h$ is also a fundamental solution for any function $h$ such that $-h''+k^2 h=0$).



          Good luck!







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 25 at 12:46

























          answered Mar 24 at 16:46









          Stefano BorghiniStefano Borghini

          114




          114





















              0












              $begingroup$

              Write



              $$u'u''=k^2uu'$$ and integrate to get



              $$u'^2=k^2u^2pm c^2.$$



              This is a separable equation,



              $$fracu'sqrtdfrack^2c^2u^2pm1=c^2$$



              which integrates as



              $$frac cktextarcoshfrackuc=pm cx+c'$$ or



              $$frac cktextarsinhfrackuc=pm cx+c'.$$



              Finally,



              $$u=frac ckcosh(pm kx+c'')$$ or



              $$u=frac cksinh(pm kx+c'').$$



              You can convince yourself that this covers all cases of



              $$ae^kx+be^-kx.$$




              Needless to say, by the theory of linear ODE with constant coefficients, the solution is an arbitrary linear combination of exponentials with parameters equal to the roots of the characteristic equation



              $$lambda^2-k^2=0.$$




              As you are looking for the fundamental solution, $a$ and $b$ remain free parameters.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                0












                $begingroup$

                Write



                $$u'u''=k^2uu'$$ and integrate to get



                $$u'^2=k^2u^2pm c^2.$$



                This is a separable equation,



                $$fracu'sqrtdfrack^2c^2u^2pm1=c^2$$



                which integrates as



                $$frac cktextarcoshfrackuc=pm cx+c'$$ or



                $$frac cktextarsinhfrackuc=pm cx+c'.$$



                Finally,



                $$u=frac ckcosh(pm kx+c'')$$ or



                $$u=frac cksinh(pm kx+c'').$$



                You can convince yourself that this covers all cases of



                $$ae^kx+be^-kx.$$




                Needless to say, by the theory of linear ODE with constant coefficients, the solution is an arbitrary linear combination of exponentials with parameters equal to the roots of the characteristic equation



                $$lambda^2-k^2=0.$$




                As you are looking for the fundamental solution, $a$ and $b$ remain free parameters.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Write



                  $$u'u''=k^2uu'$$ and integrate to get



                  $$u'^2=k^2u^2pm c^2.$$



                  This is a separable equation,



                  $$fracu'sqrtdfrack^2c^2u^2pm1=c^2$$



                  which integrates as



                  $$frac cktextarcoshfrackuc=pm cx+c'$$ or



                  $$frac cktextarsinhfrackuc=pm cx+c'.$$



                  Finally,



                  $$u=frac ckcosh(pm kx+c'')$$ or



                  $$u=frac cksinh(pm kx+c'').$$



                  You can convince yourself that this covers all cases of



                  $$ae^kx+be^-kx.$$




                  Needless to say, by the theory of linear ODE with constant coefficients, the solution is an arbitrary linear combination of exponentials with parameters equal to the roots of the characteristic equation



                  $$lambda^2-k^2=0.$$




                  As you are looking for the fundamental solution, $a$ and $b$ remain free parameters.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Write



                  $$u'u''=k^2uu'$$ and integrate to get



                  $$u'^2=k^2u^2pm c^2.$$



                  This is a separable equation,



                  $$fracu'sqrtdfrack^2c^2u^2pm1=c^2$$



                  which integrates as



                  $$frac cktextarcoshfrackuc=pm cx+c'$$ or



                  $$frac cktextarsinhfrackuc=pm cx+c'.$$



                  Finally,



                  $$u=frac ckcosh(pm kx+c'')$$ or



                  $$u=frac cksinh(pm kx+c'').$$



                  You can convince yourself that this covers all cases of



                  $$ae^kx+be^-kx.$$




                  Needless to say, by the theory of linear ODE with constant coefficients, the solution is an arbitrary linear combination of exponentials with parameters equal to the roots of the characteristic equation



                  $$lambda^2-k^2=0.$$




                  As you are looking for the fundamental solution, $a$ and $b$ remain free parameters.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 22 at 9:25









                  Yves DaoustYves Daoust

                  132k676230




                  132k676230



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157913%2ffinding-the-fundamental-solution-of-an-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

                      Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

                      Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers