Proving the identity $(tan^2(x)+1)(cos^2(-x)-1)=-tan^2(x)$Trigonometric equality: $frac1 + sin A - cos A1 + sin A + cos A = tan fracA2$Prove $fracsin(A+B)cos(A-B)=fractan A+tan B1+tan Atan B$Prove trigonometry identity for $sin A+cos A$Proving $sin^2x+cos^2x=1$Proving tan((x + y)/2) = (sin x + sin y)/(cos x + cos y) with the angle sum and difference identitiesProve Trig IdentitiesHow to simplify a trigonometric expression with the identitiesDetermine exact values using angle sum and difference identity (trig)Trigonometry Exact Value using Half Angle IdentityDoes the trigonometric identity $cos^2(theta)+sin^2(theta)=1$ apply even when $theta$ is not in radians or degrees but simply a fraction?

Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?

Patience, young "Padovan"

Pronouncing Dictionary.com's W.O.D "vade mecum" in English

How to re-create Edward Weson's Pepper No. 30?

Do any Labour MPs support no-deal?

A Journey Through Space and Time

How to report a triplet of septets in NMR tabulation?

How can I hide my bitcoin transactions to protect anonymity from others?

What would the Romans have called "sorcery"?

Banach space and Hilbert space topology

How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?

How is it possible for user to changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)

Symplectic equivalent of commuting matrices

What exactly is the parasitic white layer that forms after iron parts are treated with ammonia?

How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?

How can I automatically replace [[ and ]] with the [LeftDoubleBracket] and [RightDoubleBracket] operators?

Japan - Plan around max visa duration

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?

Is there really no realistic way for a skeleton monster to move around without magic?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?



Proving the identity $(tan^2(x)+1)(cos^2(-x)-1)=-tan^2(x)$


Trigonometric equality: $frac1 + sin A - cos A1 + sin A + cos A = tan fracA2$Prove $fracsin(A+B)cos(A-B)=fractan A+tan B1+tan Atan B$Prove trigonometry identity for $sin A+cos A$Proving $sin^2x+cos^2x=1$Proving tan((x + y)/2) = (sin x + sin y)/(cos x + cos y) with the angle sum and difference identitiesProve Trig IdentitiesHow to simplify a trigonometric expression with the identitiesDetermine exact values using angle sum and difference identity (trig)Trigonometry Exact Value using Half Angle IdentityDoes the trigonometric identity $cos^2(theta)+sin^2(theta)=1$ apply even when $theta$ is not in radians or degrees but simply a fraction?













1












$begingroup$


Proving the trigonometric identity $(tan^2x+1)(cos^2(-x)-1)=-tan^2x$ has been quite the challenge. I have so far attempted using simply the basic trigonometric identities based on the Pythagorean Theorem. I am unsure if these basic identities are unsuitable for the situation or if I am not looking at the right angle to tackle this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $tan^2(x)+1=sec^2(x)=frac 1 cos^2(x)$ and $1-cos^2(-x)=1-cos^2(x)=sin^2(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Mar 22 at 8:25







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I wonder how you failed to solve this using the Pythagorean theorem, this is straightforward.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 22 at 8:32















1












$begingroup$


Proving the trigonometric identity $(tan^2x+1)(cos^2(-x)-1)=-tan^2x$ has been quite the challenge. I have so far attempted using simply the basic trigonometric identities based on the Pythagorean Theorem. I am unsure if these basic identities are unsuitable for the situation or if I am not looking at the right angle to tackle this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $tan^2(x)+1=sec^2(x)=frac 1 cos^2(x)$ and $1-cos^2(-x)=1-cos^2(x)=sin^2(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Mar 22 at 8:25







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I wonder how you failed to solve this using the Pythagorean theorem, this is straightforward.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 22 at 8:32













1












1








1





$begingroup$


Proving the trigonometric identity $(tan^2x+1)(cos^2(-x)-1)=-tan^2x$ has been quite the challenge. I have so far attempted using simply the basic trigonometric identities based on the Pythagorean Theorem. I am unsure if these basic identities are unsuitable for the situation or if I am not looking at the right angle to tackle this problem.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Proving the trigonometric identity $(tan^2x+1)(cos^2(-x)-1)=-tan^2x$ has been quite the challenge. I have so far attempted using simply the basic trigonometric identities based on the Pythagorean Theorem. I am unsure if these basic identities are unsuitable for the situation or if I am not looking at the right angle to tackle this problem.







trigonometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 22 at 8:31









Eevee Trainer

10.1k31742




10.1k31742










asked Mar 22 at 8:23









JamesJames

425




425







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $tan^2(x)+1=sec^2(x)=frac 1 cos^2(x)$ and $1-cos^2(-x)=1-cos^2(x)=sin^2(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Mar 22 at 8:25







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I wonder how you failed to solve this using the Pythagorean theorem, this is straightforward.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 22 at 8:32












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $tan^2(x)+1=sec^2(x)=frac 1 cos^2(x)$ and $1-cos^2(-x)=1-cos^2(x)=sin^2(x)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Mar 22 at 8:25







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I wonder how you failed to solve this using the Pythagorean theorem, this is straightforward.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 22 at 8:32







2




2




$begingroup$
$tan^2(x)+1=sec^2(x)=frac 1 cos^2(x)$ and $1-cos^2(-x)=1-cos^2(x)=sin^2(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 22 at 8:25





$begingroup$
$tan^2(x)+1=sec^2(x)=frac 1 cos^2(x)$ and $1-cos^2(-x)=1-cos^2(x)=sin^2(x)$.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Mar 22 at 8:25





1




1




$begingroup$
I wonder how you failed to solve this using the Pythagorean theorem, this is straightforward.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Mar 22 at 8:32




$begingroup$
I wonder how you failed to solve this using the Pythagorean theorem, this is straightforward.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
Mar 22 at 8:32










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Hint:



Multiply the two members by $cos^2x$ (certainly nonzero):



$$(sin^2x+cos^2x)(cos^2x-1)=-sin^2x.$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I do not believe your work is correct.
    $endgroup$
    – James
    Mar 22 at 8:41






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @James I strongly believe his work is correct and elegant.
    $endgroup$
    – Le Anh Dung
    Mar 22 at 8:43






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @James: my approach is fully correct. Sorry to say, you don't understand the principle of proving identities. You can rewrite keeping the denominators, but this is unnecessary. By the way, we can multiply by $cos^2x$ as this factor is guaranteed to be nonzero.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 22 at 8:48







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @James: It is perfectly acceptable to prove an identity by transforming it in a reversible way. With this case, in multiplying-through by a non-zero expression ($cos^2x$), Yves reduced the identity to an utter triviality; to recapture the original identity, one could simply reverse the process and divide the triviality by the same non-zero expression ... even so, the essence of the identity is already established in the transformed version. (Note: We may assume $cos^2 x$ is non-zero, since the appearance of $tan x$ restricts the domain of consideration appropriately.)
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Mar 22 at 9:28







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @James: if $cne0$, $a=biff ca=cb$. This is what you are missing. You don't have the correct experience in proving identities (no offense but I urge you to review your understanding of equivalence of identities), and you disregarded my comment that explained how to reshape the proof to your taste.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    Mar 22 at 9:34


















2












$begingroup$

Expanding gives $sin^2x-tan^2x+cos^2x-1$. The undesired terms cancel because $sin^2x+cos^2x=1$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    Recall:



    $$beginalign
    tan^2(x) - sec^2(x) &= -1 \
    sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) &= 1
    endalign$$



    Thus,



    $$beginalign
    tan^2(x) + 1 &= sec^2(x)\
    cos^2(x) - 1 &= -sin^2(x)
    endalign$$



    We also note that $cos(x)$ is an even function, and thus $cos(-x) = cos(x)$. Thus, the formula becomes:



    $$(tan^2(x) + 1)(cos^2(-x) - 1) = -sec^2(x)sin^2(x) = - fracsin^2(x)cos^2(x) = -tan^2(x)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      1












      $begingroup$

      1. $1+tan^2x=sec^2x$

      2. $sin^2x+cos^2x=1$


      3. $cos x=cos(-x)$ i.e. $cos x$ is an even function.

      4. $sec x=1/cos x$

      $$underbraceleft(1+tan^2xright)_=sec^2xunderbraceleft(cos^2(-x)-1right)_cos xtext is even function=-sec^2xcdotsin^2x=-tan^2x $$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        0












        $begingroup$

        We know




        • $(tan x)' = 1 + tan^2 x = frac1cos^2 x$ and

        • $cos (-x) = cos x$

        Now, it follows immediately
        begineqnarray* (tan^2(x)+1)(cos^2(-x)-1)
        & = & (tan x)'left(frac1(tan x)'-1right) \
        & = & 1 - (tan x)' \
        & = & 1 - (1 + tan ^2 x) \
        & = & - tan ^2 x \
        endeqnarray*






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157886%2fproving-the-identity-tan2x1-cos2-x-1-tan2x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          Hint:



          Multiply the two members by $cos^2x$ (certainly nonzero):



          $$(sin^2x+cos^2x)(cos^2x-1)=-sin^2x.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I do not believe your work is correct.
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 22 at 8:41






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @James I strongly believe his work is correct and elegant.
            $endgroup$
            – Le Anh Dung
            Mar 22 at 8:43






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @James: my approach is fully correct. Sorry to say, you don't understand the principle of proving identities. You can rewrite keeping the denominators, but this is unnecessary. By the way, we can multiply by $cos^2x$ as this factor is guaranteed to be nonzero.
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Mar 22 at 8:48







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @James: It is perfectly acceptable to prove an identity by transforming it in a reversible way. With this case, in multiplying-through by a non-zero expression ($cos^2x$), Yves reduced the identity to an utter triviality; to recapture the original identity, one could simply reverse the process and divide the triviality by the same non-zero expression ... even so, the essence of the identity is already established in the transformed version. (Note: We may assume $cos^2 x$ is non-zero, since the appearance of $tan x$ restricts the domain of consideration appropriately.)
            $endgroup$
            – Blue
            Mar 22 at 9:28







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @James: if $cne0$, $a=biff ca=cb$. This is what you are missing. You don't have the correct experience in proving identities (no offense but I urge you to review your understanding of equivalence of identities), and you disregarded my comment that explained how to reshape the proof to your taste.
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Mar 22 at 9:34















          3












          $begingroup$

          Hint:



          Multiply the two members by $cos^2x$ (certainly nonzero):



          $$(sin^2x+cos^2x)(cos^2x-1)=-sin^2x.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I do not believe your work is correct.
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 22 at 8:41






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @James I strongly believe his work is correct and elegant.
            $endgroup$
            – Le Anh Dung
            Mar 22 at 8:43






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @James: my approach is fully correct. Sorry to say, you don't understand the principle of proving identities. You can rewrite keeping the denominators, but this is unnecessary. By the way, we can multiply by $cos^2x$ as this factor is guaranteed to be nonzero.
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Mar 22 at 8:48







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @James: It is perfectly acceptable to prove an identity by transforming it in a reversible way. With this case, in multiplying-through by a non-zero expression ($cos^2x$), Yves reduced the identity to an utter triviality; to recapture the original identity, one could simply reverse the process and divide the triviality by the same non-zero expression ... even so, the essence of the identity is already established in the transformed version. (Note: We may assume $cos^2 x$ is non-zero, since the appearance of $tan x$ restricts the domain of consideration appropriately.)
            $endgroup$
            – Blue
            Mar 22 at 9:28







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @James: if $cne0$, $a=biff ca=cb$. This is what you are missing. You don't have the correct experience in proving identities (no offense but I urge you to review your understanding of equivalence of identities), and you disregarded my comment that explained how to reshape the proof to your taste.
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Mar 22 at 9:34













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Hint:



          Multiply the two members by $cos^2x$ (certainly nonzero):



          $$(sin^2x+cos^2x)(cos^2x-1)=-sin^2x.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Hint:



          Multiply the two members by $cos^2x$ (certainly nonzero):



          $$(sin^2x+cos^2x)(cos^2x-1)=-sin^2x.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Mar 22 at 10:26

























          answered Mar 22 at 8:34









          Yves DaoustYves Daoust

          132k676230




          132k676230











          • $begingroup$
            I do not believe your work is correct.
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 22 at 8:41






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @James I strongly believe his work is correct and elegant.
            $endgroup$
            – Le Anh Dung
            Mar 22 at 8:43






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @James: my approach is fully correct. Sorry to say, you don't understand the principle of proving identities. You can rewrite keeping the denominators, but this is unnecessary. By the way, we can multiply by $cos^2x$ as this factor is guaranteed to be nonzero.
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Mar 22 at 8:48







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @James: It is perfectly acceptable to prove an identity by transforming it in a reversible way. With this case, in multiplying-through by a non-zero expression ($cos^2x$), Yves reduced the identity to an utter triviality; to recapture the original identity, one could simply reverse the process and divide the triviality by the same non-zero expression ... even so, the essence of the identity is already established in the transformed version. (Note: We may assume $cos^2 x$ is non-zero, since the appearance of $tan x$ restricts the domain of consideration appropriately.)
            $endgroup$
            – Blue
            Mar 22 at 9:28







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @James: if $cne0$, $a=biff ca=cb$. This is what you are missing. You don't have the correct experience in proving identities (no offense but I urge you to review your understanding of equivalence of identities), and you disregarded my comment that explained how to reshape the proof to your taste.
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Mar 22 at 9:34
















          • $begingroup$
            I do not believe your work is correct.
            $endgroup$
            – James
            Mar 22 at 8:41






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @James I strongly believe his work is correct and elegant.
            $endgroup$
            – Le Anh Dung
            Mar 22 at 8:43






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @James: my approach is fully correct. Sorry to say, you don't understand the principle of proving identities. You can rewrite keeping the denominators, but this is unnecessary. By the way, we can multiply by $cos^2x$ as this factor is guaranteed to be nonzero.
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Mar 22 at 8:48







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            @James: It is perfectly acceptable to prove an identity by transforming it in a reversible way. With this case, in multiplying-through by a non-zero expression ($cos^2x$), Yves reduced the identity to an utter triviality; to recapture the original identity, one could simply reverse the process and divide the triviality by the same non-zero expression ... even so, the essence of the identity is already established in the transformed version. (Note: We may assume $cos^2 x$ is non-zero, since the appearance of $tan x$ restricts the domain of consideration appropriately.)
            $endgroup$
            – Blue
            Mar 22 at 9:28







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @James: if $cne0$, $a=biff ca=cb$. This is what you are missing. You don't have the correct experience in proving identities (no offense but I urge you to review your understanding of equivalence of identities), and you disregarded my comment that explained how to reshape the proof to your taste.
            $endgroup$
            – Yves Daoust
            Mar 22 at 9:34















          $begingroup$
          I do not believe your work is correct.
          $endgroup$
          – James
          Mar 22 at 8:41




          $begingroup$
          I do not believe your work is correct.
          $endgroup$
          – James
          Mar 22 at 8:41




          3




          3




          $begingroup$
          @James I strongly believe his work is correct and elegant.
          $endgroup$
          – Le Anh Dung
          Mar 22 at 8:43




          $begingroup$
          @James I strongly believe his work is correct and elegant.
          $endgroup$
          – Le Anh Dung
          Mar 22 at 8:43




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @James: my approach is fully correct. Sorry to say, you don't understand the principle of proving identities. You can rewrite keeping the denominators, but this is unnecessary. By the way, we can multiply by $cos^2x$ as this factor is guaranteed to be nonzero.
          $endgroup$
          – Yves Daoust
          Mar 22 at 8:48





          $begingroup$
          @James: my approach is fully correct. Sorry to say, you don't understand the principle of proving identities. You can rewrite keeping the denominators, but this is unnecessary. By the way, we can multiply by $cos^2x$ as this factor is guaranteed to be nonzero.
          $endgroup$
          – Yves Daoust
          Mar 22 at 8:48





          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          @James: It is perfectly acceptable to prove an identity by transforming it in a reversible way. With this case, in multiplying-through by a non-zero expression ($cos^2x$), Yves reduced the identity to an utter triviality; to recapture the original identity, one could simply reverse the process and divide the triviality by the same non-zero expression ... even so, the essence of the identity is already established in the transformed version. (Note: We may assume $cos^2 x$ is non-zero, since the appearance of $tan x$ restricts the domain of consideration appropriately.)
          $endgroup$
          – Blue
          Mar 22 at 9:28





          $begingroup$
          @James: It is perfectly acceptable to prove an identity by transforming it in a reversible way. With this case, in multiplying-through by a non-zero expression ($cos^2x$), Yves reduced the identity to an utter triviality; to recapture the original identity, one could simply reverse the process and divide the triviality by the same non-zero expression ... even so, the essence of the identity is already established in the transformed version. (Note: We may assume $cos^2 x$ is non-zero, since the appearance of $tan x$ restricts the domain of consideration appropriately.)
          $endgroup$
          – Blue
          Mar 22 at 9:28





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @James: if $cne0$, $a=biff ca=cb$. This is what you are missing. You don't have the correct experience in proving identities (no offense but I urge you to review your understanding of equivalence of identities), and you disregarded my comment that explained how to reshape the proof to your taste.
          $endgroup$
          – Yves Daoust
          Mar 22 at 9:34




          $begingroup$
          @James: if $cne0$, $a=biff ca=cb$. This is what you are missing. You don't have the correct experience in proving identities (no offense but I urge you to review your understanding of equivalence of identities), and you disregarded my comment that explained how to reshape the proof to your taste.
          $endgroup$
          – Yves Daoust
          Mar 22 at 9:34











          2












          $begingroup$

          Expanding gives $sin^2x-tan^2x+cos^2x-1$. The undesired terms cancel because $sin^2x+cos^2x=1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$

















            2












            $begingroup$

            Expanding gives $sin^2x-tan^2x+cos^2x-1$. The undesired terms cancel because $sin^2x+cos^2x=1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$















              2












              2








              2





              $begingroup$

              Expanding gives $sin^2x-tan^2x+cos^2x-1$. The undesired terms cancel because $sin^2x+cos^2x=1$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Expanding gives $sin^2x-tan^2x+cos^2x-1$. The undesired terms cancel because $sin^2x+cos^2x=1$.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Mar 22 at 8:29









              J.G.J.G.

              32.9k23250




              32.9k23250





















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  Recall:



                  $$beginalign
                  tan^2(x) - sec^2(x) &= -1 \
                  sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) &= 1
                  endalign$$



                  Thus,



                  $$beginalign
                  tan^2(x) + 1 &= sec^2(x)\
                  cos^2(x) - 1 &= -sin^2(x)
                  endalign$$



                  We also note that $cos(x)$ is an even function, and thus $cos(-x) = cos(x)$. Thus, the formula becomes:



                  $$(tan^2(x) + 1)(cos^2(-x) - 1) = -sec^2(x)sin^2(x) = - fracsin^2(x)cos^2(x) = -tan^2(x)$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$

















                    1












                    $begingroup$

                    Recall:



                    $$beginalign
                    tan^2(x) - sec^2(x) &= -1 \
                    sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) &= 1
                    endalign$$



                    Thus,



                    $$beginalign
                    tan^2(x) + 1 &= sec^2(x)\
                    cos^2(x) - 1 &= -sin^2(x)
                    endalign$$



                    We also note that $cos(x)$ is an even function, and thus $cos(-x) = cos(x)$. Thus, the formula becomes:



                    $$(tan^2(x) + 1)(cos^2(-x) - 1) = -sec^2(x)sin^2(x) = - fracsin^2(x)cos^2(x) = -tan^2(x)$$






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$















                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      Recall:



                      $$beginalign
                      tan^2(x) - sec^2(x) &= -1 \
                      sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) &= 1
                      endalign$$



                      Thus,



                      $$beginalign
                      tan^2(x) + 1 &= sec^2(x)\
                      cos^2(x) - 1 &= -sin^2(x)
                      endalign$$



                      We also note that $cos(x)$ is an even function, and thus $cos(-x) = cos(x)$. Thus, the formula becomes:



                      $$(tan^2(x) + 1)(cos^2(-x) - 1) = -sec^2(x)sin^2(x) = - fracsin^2(x)cos^2(x) = -tan^2(x)$$






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      Recall:



                      $$beginalign
                      tan^2(x) - sec^2(x) &= -1 \
                      sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) &= 1
                      endalign$$



                      Thus,



                      $$beginalign
                      tan^2(x) + 1 &= sec^2(x)\
                      cos^2(x) - 1 &= -sin^2(x)
                      endalign$$



                      We also note that $cos(x)$ is an even function, and thus $cos(-x) = cos(x)$. Thus, the formula becomes:



                      $$(tan^2(x) + 1)(cos^2(-x) - 1) = -sec^2(x)sin^2(x) = - fracsin^2(x)cos^2(x) = -tan^2(x)$$







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Mar 22 at 8:30









                      Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

                      10.1k31742




                      10.1k31742





















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          1. $1+tan^2x=sec^2x$

                          2. $sin^2x+cos^2x=1$


                          3. $cos x=cos(-x)$ i.e. $cos x$ is an even function.

                          4. $sec x=1/cos x$

                          $$underbraceleft(1+tan^2xright)_=sec^2xunderbraceleft(cos^2(-x)-1right)_cos xtext is even function=-sec^2xcdotsin^2x=-tan^2x $$






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$

















                            1












                            $begingroup$

                            1. $1+tan^2x=sec^2x$

                            2. $sin^2x+cos^2x=1$


                            3. $cos x=cos(-x)$ i.e. $cos x$ is an even function.

                            4. $sec x=1/cos x$

                            $$underbraceleft(1+tan^2xright)_=sec^2xunderbraceleft(cos^2(-x)-1right)_cos xtext is even function=-sec^2xcdotsin^2x=-tan^2x $$






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$















                              1












                              1








                              1





                              $begingroup$

                              1. $1+tan^2x=sec^2x$

                              2. $sin^2x+cos^2x=1$


                              3. $cos x=cos(-x)$ i.e. $cos x$ is an even function.

                              4. $sec x=1/cos x$

                              $$underbraceleft(1+tan^2xright)_=sec^2xunderbraceleft(cos^2(-x)-1right)_cos xtext is even function=-sec^2xcdotsin^2x=-tan^2x $$






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              1. $1+tan^2x=sec^2x$

                              2. $sin^2x+cos^2x=1$


                              3. $cos x=cos(-x)$ i.e. $cos x$ is an even function.

                              4. $sec x=1/cos x$

                              $$underbraceleft(1+tan^2xright)_=sec^2xunderbraceleft(cos^2(-x)-1right)_cos xtext is even function=-sec^2xcdotsin^2x=-tan^2x $$







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Mar 22 at 8:31









                              Paras KhoslaParas Khosla

                              2,883523




                              2,883523





















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  We know




                                  • $(tan x)' = 1 + tan^2 x = frac1cos^2 x$ and

                                  • $cos (-x) = cos x$

                                  Now, it follows immediately
                                  begineqnarray* (tan^2(x)+1)(cos^2(-x)-1)
                                  & = & (tan x)'left(frac1(tan x)'-1right) \
                                  & = & 1 - (tan x)' \
                                  & = & 1 - (1 + tan ^2 x) \
                                  & = & - tan ^2 x \
                                  endeqnarray*






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$

















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    We know




                                    • $(tan x)' = 1 + tan^2 x = frac1cos^2 x$ and

                                    • $cos (-x) = cos x$

                                    Now, it follows immediately
                                    begineqnarray* (tan^2(x)+1)(cos^2(-x)-1)
                                    & = & (tan x)'left(frac1(tan x)'-1right) \
                                    & = & 1 - (tan x)' \
                                    & = & 1 - (1 + tan ^2 x) \
                                    & = & - tan ^2 x \
                                    endeqnarray*






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$















                                      0












                                      0








                                      0





                                      $begingroup$

                                      We know




                                      • $(tan x)' = 1 + tan^2 x = frac1cos^2 x$ and

                                      • $cos (-x) = cos x$

                                      Now, it follows immediately
                                      begineqnarray* (tan^2(x)+1)(cos^2(-x)-1)
                                      & = & (tan x)'left(frac1(tan x)'-1right) \
                                      & = & 1 - (tan x)' \
                                      & = & 1 - (1 + tan ^2 x) \
                                      & = & - tan ^2 x \
                                      endeqnarray*






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      We know




                                      • $(tan x)' = 1 + tan^2 x = frac1cos^2 x$ and

                                      • $cos (-x) = cos x$

                                      Now, it follows immediately
                                      begineqnarray* (tan^2(x)+1)(cos^2(-x)-1)
                                      & = & (tan x)'left(frac1(tan x)'-1right) \
                                      & = & 1 - (tan x)' \
                                      & = & 1 - (1 + tan ^2 x) \
                                      & = & - tan ^2 x \
                                      endeqnarray*







                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered Mar 22 at 9:11









                                      trancelocationtrancelocation

                                      13.6k1829




                                      13.6k1829



























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded
















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157886%2fproving-the-identity-tan2x1-cos2-x-1-tan2x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Moe incest case Sentencing See also References Navigation menu"'Australian Josef Fritzl' fathered four children by daughter""Small town recoils in horror at 'Australian Fritzl' incest case""Victorian rape allegations echo Fritzl case - Just In (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)""Incest father jailed for 22 years""'Australian Fritzl' sentenced to 22 years in prison for abusing daughter for three decades""RSJ v The Queen"

                                          Daza language Contents Vocabulary Phonology References External links Navigation menudaza1242Daza"Dazaga"eeee178086576

                                          Who is our nearest planetary neighbor, on average?Santa Claus flies to the South PoleSeven Spheres of Unequal Mass, a weighing problem with a twistDescribe a large integerFast Mental Calculation of $7.5^7$Math in Space (without the help of celebrities)Find the value of $bigstar$: Puzzle 8 - InequalityWho drinks beer while running anyway?A Crucial DeliveryRanking And AverageHow long will my money last at roulette?