Prove that $forall m in mathbbN^*,exists n in mathbbN,forall k geq n, p_k+1^m<prod_i=1^kp_i$Is it true that $sum_k=1^n(p_kprod_i=1^k(1-p_i)) stackrelmbox?= 1 - prod_i=1^n(1-p_i)$Estimate for the product of primes less than nProve or disprove that $forall kinmathbb N$ there exist tree consecutive primes such that $p_i-p_i-1gt k$ and $p_i+1-p_igt k$Inequality with Euler's totient functionProve if $n=p_1p_2cdots p_k +1$, then for every $i$, $i=1,2,cdots k, p_i$ does not divide n.Prove that $prod_i<j (p_i^p_j-p_j^p_i)$ is divisible by $5777$Prove $prod_c < p leq x left(1 - fraccp right) ll log ^-c x .$Prove that $forall xinmathbbN text there always exists a prime pequiv1 pmod 6 text s.t. p|(2x)^2+3;$Interesting missing proof (Prime Number Theorem)Weak k-Tuple conjecture form and what we should proof
Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)
Set-theoretical foundations of Mathematics with only bounded quantifiers
Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?
How can I automatically replace [[ and ]] with the [LeftDoubleBracket] and [RightDoubleBracket] operators?
How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?
"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it
How old can references or sources in a thesis be?
Why has Russell's definition of numbers using equivalence classes been finally abandoned? ( If it has actually been abandoned).
Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?
"which" command doesn't work / path of Safari?
Motorized valve interfering with button?
If Manufacturer spice model and Datasheet give different values which should I use?
Example of a relative pronoun
Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted
Can I make popcorn with any corn?
Draw simple lines in Inkscape
Pronouncing Dictionary.com's W.O.D "vade mecum" in English
Japan - Plan around max visa duration
What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?
Continuity at a point in terms of closure
DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?
Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?
When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?
What would the Romans have called "sorcery"?
Prove that $forall m in mathbbN^*,exists n in mathbbN,forall k geq n, p_k+1^m
Is it true that $sum_k=1^n(p_kprod_i=1^k(1-p_i)) stackrelmbox?= 1 - prod_i=1^n(1-p_i)$Estimate for the product of primes less than nProve or disprove that $forall kinmathbb N$ there exist tree consecutive primes such that $p_i-p_i-1gt k$ and $p_i+1-p_igt k$Inequality with Euler's totient functionProve if $n=p_1p_2cdots p_k +1$, then for every $i$, $i=1,2,cdots k, p_i$ does not divide n.Prove that $prod_i<j (p_i^p_j-p_j^p_i)$ is divisible by $5777$Prove $prod_c < p leq x left(1 - fraccp right) ll log ^-c x .$Prove that $forall xinmathbbN text there always exists a prime pequiv1 pmod 6 text s.t. p|(2x)^2+3;$Interesting missing proof (Prime Number Theorem)Weak k-Tuple conjecture form and what we should proof
$begingroup$
I need to prove :
$$forall m in mathbbN^*,exists n in mathbbN,forall k geq n, p_k+1^m<prod_i=1^kp_i$$
I can prove this assertion using Prime number theorem :
For fixed $m$ we have : $logleft(displaystyle prod_i=1^kp_i right) sim p_k$ and $log(p_k+1) sim log(k+1)$ give the result.
But I need another proof not asymptotic.
number-theory elementary-number-theory prime-numbers arithmetic
$endgroup$
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
I need to prove :
$$forall m in mathbbN^*,exists n in mathbbN,forall k geq n, p_k+1^m<prod_i=1^kp_i$$
I can prove this assertion using Prime number theorem :
For fixed $m$ we have : $logleft(displaystyle prod_i=1^kp_i right) sim p_k$ and $log(p_k+1) sim log(k+1)$ give the result.
But I need another proof not asymptotic.
number-theory elementary-number-theory prime-numbers arithmetic
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Bertrand postulate?
$endgroup$
– Collag3n
Mar 22 at 10:20
$begingroup$
Betrand postulate gives $p_i < p_i+1 < 2p_i$. But the question is about $p_k+1$ and the primorial of $p_k$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 10:28
$begingroup$
Bertrand postulate gives $p_i < 2^i implies p_k+1^m < 2^m(k+1)$ and if we can proove $2^m(k+1) < displaystyle prod_i=1^kp_i$ for some $k geq n$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 11:14
$begingroup$
We have $2^leftlfloor log(p_i)/log(2) rightrfloor leq p_i$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 11:15
1
$begingroup$
Can someone explain why the downvote
$endgroup$
– HAMIDINE SOUMARE
Mar 22 at 14:18
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
I need to prove :
$$forall m in mathbbN^*,exists n in mathbbN,forall k geq n, p_k+1^m<prod_i=1^kp_i$$
I can prove this assertion using Prime number theorem :
For fixed $m$ we have : $logleft(displaystyle prod_i=1^kp_i right) sim p_k$ and $log(p_k+1) sim log(k+1)$ give the result.
But I need another proof not asymptotic.
number-theory elementary-number-theory prime-numbers arithmetic
$endgroup$
I need to prove :
$$forall m in mathbbN^*,exists n in mathbbN,forall k geq n, p_k+1^m<prod_i=1^kp_i$$
I can prove this assertion using Prime number theorem :
For fixed $m$ we have : $logleft(displaystyle prod_i=1^kp_i right) sim p_k$ and $log(p_k+1) sim log(k+1)$ give the result.
But I need another proof not asymptotic.
number-theory elementary-number-theory prime-numbers arithmetic
number-theory elementary-number-theory prime-numbers arithmetic
edited Mar 22 at 18:35
LAGRIDA
asked Mar 22 at 8:23
LAGRIDALAGRIDA
270112
270112
$begingroup$
Bertrand postulate?
$endgroup$
– Collag3n
Mar 22 at 10:20
$begingroup$
Betrand postulate gives $p_i < p_i+1 < 2p_i$. But the question is about $p_k+1$ and the primorial of $p_k$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 10:28
$begingroup$
Bertrand postulate gives $p_i < 2^i implies p_k+1^m < 2^m(k+1)$ and if we can proove $2^m(k+1) < displaystyle prod_i=1^kp_i$ for some $k geq n$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 11:14
$begingroup$
We have $2^leftlfloor log(p_i)/log(2) rightrfloor leq p_i$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 11:15
1
$begingroup$
Can someone explain why the downvote
$endgroup$
– HAMIDINE SOUMARE
Mar 22 at 14:18
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Bertrand postulate?
$endgroup$
– Collag3n
Mar 22 at 10:20
$begingroup$
Betrand postulate gives $p_i < p_i+1 < 2p_i$. But the question is about $p_k+1$ and the primorial of $p_k$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 10:28
$begingroup$
Bertrand postulate gives $p_i < 2^i implies p_k+1^m < 2^m(k+1)$ and if we can proove $2^m(k+1) < displaystyle prod_i=1^kp_i$ for some $k geq n$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 11:14
$begingroup$
We have $2^leftlfloor log(p_i)/log(2) rightrfloor leq p_i$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 11:15
1
$begingroup$
Can someone explain why the downvote
$endgroup$
– HAMIDINE SOUMARE
Mar 22 at 14:18
$begingroup$
Bertrand postulate?
$endgroup$
– Collag3n
Mar 22 at 10:20
$begingroup$
Bertrand postulate?
$endgroup$
– Collag3n
Mar 22 at 10:20
$begingroup$
Betrand postulate gives $p_i < p_i+1 < 2p_i$. But the question is about $p_k+1$ and the primorial of $p_k$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 10:28
$begingroup$
Betrand postulate gives $p_i < p_i+1 < 2p_i$. But the question is about $p_k+1$ and the primorial of $p_k$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 10:28
$begingroup$
Bertrand postulate gives $p_i < 2^i implies p_k+1^m < 2^m(k+1)$ and if we can proove $2^m(k+1) < displaystyle prod_i=1^kp_i$ for some $k geq n$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 11:14
$begingroup$
Bertrand postulate gives $p_i < 2^i implies p_k+1^m < 2^m(k+1)$ and if we can proove $2^m(k+1) < displaystyle prod_i=1^kp_i$ for some $k geq n$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 11:14
$begingroup$
We have $2^leftlfloor log(p_i)/log(2) rightrfloor leq p_i$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 11:15
$begingroup$
We have $2^leftlfloor log(p_i)/log(2) rightrfloor leq p_i$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 11:15
1
1
$begingroup$
Can someone explain why the downvote
$endgroup$
– HAMIDINE SOUMARE
Mar 22 at 14:18
$begingroup$
Can someone explain why the downvote
$endgroup$
– HAMIDINE SOUMARE
Mar 22 at 14:18
|
show 5 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157889%2fprove-that-forall-m-in-mathbbn-exists-n-in-mathbbn-forall-k-geq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3157889%2fprove-that-forall-m-in-mathbbn-exists-n-in-mathbbn-forall-k-geq%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Bertrand postulate?
$endgroup$
– Collag3n
Mar 22 at 10:20
$begingroup$
Betrand postulate gives $p_i < p_i+1 < 2p_i$. But the question is about $p_k+1$ and the primorial of $p_k$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 10:28
$begingroup$
Bertrand postulate gives $p_i < 2^i implies p_k+1^m < 2^m(k+1)$ and if we can proove $2^m(k+1) < displaystyle prod_i=1^kp_i$ for some $k geq n$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 11:14
$begingroup$
We have $2^leftlfloor log(p_i)/log(2) rightrfloor leq p_i$
$endgroup$
– LAGRIDA
Mar 22 at 11:15
1
$begingroup$
Can someone explain why the downvote
$endgroup$
– HAMIDINE SOUMARE
Mar 22 at 14:18