Is “ordinary differential equations in more than two variables” correct? Used in two booksI need an example of a differential equation (nontrivial) that involves more than one unknown functionsEliminate the arbitrary funcion - PDE first orderFinding a general solution of a partial differential equation.Didactic examples in linear ordinary differential equationsUsing the two partial differential equations construct a partial differential equation containing only variable 'G' and solve it.Geometric proof of uniqueness and existence of ordinary differential equationsSolving Differential Equations without separation of variablesWhat is main differences between these Differential Equations books?How to differentiate a given unknown function involving three variables and two arbitrary constants?Use the method of separation of variables to separate the differential equation into 3 ordinary differential equations.
Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?
Is every set a filtered colimit of finite sets?
How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?
How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?
What is the meaning of "of trouble" in the following sentence?
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
Can a planet have a different gravitational pull depending on its location in orbit around its sun?
What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files
Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money
"listening to me about as much as you're listening to this pole here"
Shall I use personal or official e-mail account when registering to external websites for work purpose?
When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?
What does 'script /dev/null' do?
Are objects structures and/or vice versa?
Could Giant Ground Sloths have been a good pack animal for the ancient Mayans?
Why airport relocation isn't done gradually?
Ideas for 3rd eye abilities
How can I add custom success page
Hosting Wordpress in a EC2 Load Balanced Instance
COUNT(*) or MAX(id) - which is faster?
Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco
How to create a consistent feel for character names in a fantasy setting?
Add an angle to a sphere
I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine
Is “ordinary differential equations in more than two variables” correct? Used in two books
I need an example of a differential equation (nontrivial) that involves more than one unknown functionsEliminate the arbitrary funcion - PDE first orderFinding a general solution of a partial differential equation.Didactic examples in linear ordinary differential equationsUsing the two partial differential equations construct a partial differential equation containing only variable 'G' and solve it.Geometric proof of uniqueness and existence of ordinary differential equationsSolving Differential Equations without separation of variablesWhat is main differences between these Differential Equations books?How to differentiate a given unknown function involving three variables and two arbitrary constants?Use the method of separation of variables to separate the differential equation into 3 ordinary differential equations.
$begingroup$
I have seen the formulation "ordinary differential equations in more than two variables" in two books.
Is this terminology really correct?
The books:
The first book is Elements of Partial Differential Equations by Ian N. Sneddon. Chapter 1 is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables
(the chapter at Google Books)
:
In this chapter we shall discuss the propertires of ordinary differential equations in more than two variables.
...
... if in the rectangular Cartesian coordinates $(x,y,z)$ of a point in three-dimensional space are connected by a single relation of the type $$ f(x,y,z)=0 tag1$$
the point lies on a surface.
...
To demonstrate this generally we suppose a point $(x,y,z)$ satisfying equation $(1)$. Then any increments $(delta x, delta y, delta z)$ in $(x,y,z)$ are related by the equation $$fracpartial fpartial xdelta x + fracpartial fpartial ydelta y +fracpartial fpartial zdelta z=0$$
so that two of them can be chose arbitrarily.
The second book is A Treatise on Differential Equations by George Boole and chapter XII is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables (the chapter at Google Books):
The class of equations which we shall first consider in this Chapter, is represented by the typical form,
$$
P, dx + Q, dy + R, dz = 0,
$$
$P$, $Q$ and $R$ being functions of the variables $x$, $y$, $z$; and it is usually termed a total differential equation of the first order with three variables.
I'm confused over the terminology of using "ordinary" and "many variables" in the same sentence. Isn't a ordinary differential equation always one variable and if more than one variable it's instead a partial differential equation?
ordinary-differential-equations pde terminology
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have seen the formulation "ordinary differential equations in more than two variables" in two books.
Is this terminology really correct?
The books:
The first book is Elements of Partial Differential Equations by Ian N. Sneddon. Chapter 1 is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables
(the chapter at Google Books)
:
In this chapter we shall discuss the propertires of ordinary differential equations in more than two variables.
...
... if in the rectangular Cartesian coordinates $(x,y,z)$ of a point in three-dimensional space are connected by a single relation of the type $$ f(x,y,z)=0 tag1$$
the point lies on a surface.
...
To demonstrate this generally we suppose a point $(x,y,z)$ satisfying equation $(1)$. Then any increments $(delta x, delta y, delta z)$ in $(x,y,z)$ are related by the equation $$fracpartial fpartial xdelta x + fracpartial fpartial ydelta y +fracpartial fpartial zdelta z=0$$
so that two of them can be chose arbitrarily.
The second book is A Treatise on Differential Equations by George Boole and chapter XII is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables (the chapter at Google Books):
The class of equations which we shall first consider in this Chapter, is represented by the typical form,
$$
P, dx + Q, dy + R, dz = 0,
$$
$P$, $Q$ and $R$ being functions of the variables $x$, $y$, $z$; and it is usually termed a total differential equation of the first order with three variables.
I'm confused over the terminology of using "ordinary" and "many variables" in the same sentence. Isn't a ordinary differential equation always one variable and if more than one variable it's instead a partial differential equation?
ordinary-differential-equations pde terminology
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
They are Partial Differential Equations (PDE). Don't be confused by the terminology. The important is de definition given specifically in each book even if the symbols and terms are not always standard, especially in old littérature.
$endgroup$
– JJacquelin
Mar 22 at 14:33
$begingroup$
In the case of the book by Boole, I would say that there has been a shift in the meaning of "ordinary" and "partial" differential equations between then and now. But the book by Sneddon is recent, so I cannot explain his use of the terminology. Perhaps by reading the books, the meaning would become clear.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 22 at 23:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have seen the formulation "ordinary differential equations in more than two variables" in two books.
Is this terminology really correct?
The books:
The first book is Elements of Partial Differential Equations by Ian N. Sneddon. Chapter 1 is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables
(the chapter at Google Books)
:
In this chapter we shall discuss the propertires of ordinary differential equations in more than two variables.
...
... if in the rectangular Cartesian coordinates $(x,y,z)$ of a point in three-dimensional space are connected by a single relation of the type $$ f(x,y,z)=0 tag1$$
the point lies on a surface.
...
To demonstrate this generally we suppose a point $(x,y,z)$ satisfying equation $(1)$. Then any increments $(delta x, delta y, delta z)$ in $(x,y,z)$ are related by the equation $$fracpartial fpartial xdelta x + fracpartial fpartial ydelta y +fracpartial fpartial zdelta z=0$$
so that two of them can be chose arbitrarily.
The second book is A Treatise on Differential Equations by George Boole and chapter XII is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables (the chapter at Google Books):
The class of equations which we shall first consider in this Chapter, is represented by the typical form,
$$
P, dx + Q, dy + R, dz = 0,
$$
$P$, $Q$ and $R$ being functions of the variables $x$, $y$, $z$; and it is usually termed a total differential equation of the first order with three variables.
I'm confused over the terminology of using "ordinary" and "many variables" in the same sentence. Isn't a ordinary differential equation always one variable and if more than one variable it's instead a partial differential equation?
ordinary-differential-equations pde terminology
$endgroup$
I have seen the formulation "ordinary differential equations in more than two variables" in two books.
Is this terminology really correct?
The books:
The first book is Elements of Partial Differential Equations by Ian N. Sneddon. Chapter 1 is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables
(the chapter at Google Books)
:
In this chapter we shall discuss the propertires of ordinary differential equations in more than two variables.
...
... if in the rectangular Cartesian coordinates $(x,y,z)$ of a point in three-dimensional space are connected by a single relation of the type $$ f(x,y,z)=0 tag1$$
the point lies on a surface.
...
To demonstrate this generally we suppose a point $(x,y,z)$ satisfying equation $(1)$. Then any increments $(delta x, delta y, delta z)$ in $(x,y,z)$ are related by the equation $$fracpartial fpartial xdelta x + fracpartial fpartial ydelta y +fracpartial fpartial zdelta z=0$$
so that two of them can be chose arbitrarily.
The second book is A Treatise on Differential Equations by George Boole and chapter XII is called Ordinary differential equations in more than two variables (the chapter at Google Books):
The class of equations which we shall first consider in this Chapter, is represented by the typical form,
$$
P, dx + Q, dy + R, dz = 0,
$$
$P$, $Q$ and $R$ being functions of the variables $x$, $y$, $z$; and it is usually termed a total differential equation of the first order with three variables.
I'm confused over the terminology of using "ordinary" and "many variables" in the same sentence. Isn't a ordinary differential equation always one variable and if more than one variable it's instead a partial differential equation?
ordinary-differential-equations pde terminology
ordinary-differential-equations pde terminology
edited Mar 22 at 14:07
JDoeDoe
asked Mar 22 at 13:40
JDoeDoeJDoeDoe
7851615
7851615
$begingroup$
They are Partial Differential Equations (PDE). Don't be confused by the terminology. The important is de definition given specifically in each book even if the symbols and terms are not always standard, especially in old littérature.
$endgroup$
– JJacquelin
Mar 22 at 14:33
$begingroup$
In the case of the book by Boole, I would say that there has been a shift in the meaning of "ordinary" and "partial" differential equations between then and now. But the book by Sneddon is recent, so I cannot explain his use of the terminology. Perhaps by reading the books, the meaning would become clear.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 22 at 23:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They are Partial Differential Equations (PDE). Don't be confused by the terminology. The important is de definition given specifically in each book even if the symbols and terms are not always standard, especially in old littérature.
$endgroup$
– JJacquelin
Mar 22 at 14:33
$begingroup$
In the case of the book by Boole, I would say that there has been a shift in the meaning of "ordinary" and "partial" differential equations between then and now. But the book by Sneddon is recent, so I cannot explain his use of the terminology. Perhaps by reading the books, the meaning would become clear.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 22 at 23:42
$begingroup$
They are Partial Differential Equations (PDE). Don't be confused by the terminology. The important is de definition given specifically in each book even if the symbols and terms are not always standard, especially in old littérature.
$endgroup$
– JJacquelin
Mar 22 at 14:33
$begingroup$
They are Partial Differential Equations (PDE). Don't be confused by the terminology. The important is de definition given specifically in each book even if the symbols and terms are not always standard, especially in old littérature.
$endgroup$
– JJacquelin
Mar 22 at 14:33
$begingroup$
In the case of the book by Boole, I would say that there has been a shift in the meaning of "ordinary" and "partial" differential equations between then and now. But the book by Sneddon is recent, so I cannot explain his use of the terminology. Perhaps by reading the books, the meaning would become clear.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 22 at 23:42
$begingroup$
In the case of the book by Boole, I would say that there has been a shift in the meaning of "ordinary" and "partial" differential equations between then and now. But the book by Sneddon is recent, so I cannot explain his use of the terminology. Perhaps by reading the books, the meaning would become clear.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 22 at 23:42
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158161%2fis-ordinary-differential-equations-in-more-than-two-variables-correct-used-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158161%2fis-ordinary-differential-equations-in-more-than-two-variables-correct-used-in%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
They are Partial Differential Equations (PDE). Don't be confused by the terminology. The important is de definition given specifically in each book even if the symbols and terms are not always standard, especially in old littérature.
$endgroup$
– JJacquelin
Mar 22 at 14:33
$begingroup$
In the case of the book by Boole, I would say that there has been a shift in the meaning of "ordinary" and "partial" differential equations between then and now. But the book by Sneddon is recent, so I cannot explain his use of the terminology. Perhaps by reading the books, the meaning would become clear.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 22 at 23:42