Fdtxjr

Does the average primeness of natural numbers tend to zero?

Manga about a female worker who got dragged into another world together with this high school girl and she was just told she's not needed anymore

Was there ever an axiom rendered a theorem?

How could a lack of term limits lead to a "dictatorship?"

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?

Crop image to path created in TikZ?

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Hosting Wordpress in a EC2 Load Balanced Instance

How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?

Why was the "bread communication" in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?

Is every set a filtered colimit of finite sets?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Information to fellow intern about hiring?

COUNT(*) or MAX(id) - which is faster?

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?

Why is my log file so massive? 22gb. I am running log backups

What causes the sudden spool-up sound from an F-16 when enabling afterburner?

Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

Re-submission of rejected manuscript without informing co-authors

Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?

Is it wise to focus on putting odd beats on left when playing double bass drums?

How to move the player while also allowing forces to affect it

Two equivalent definitions of fibration structure on toric CY $3$-fold

equivalent definitions of orientationEquivalent definitions of Kähler metricAre these two definitions of $EG$ equivalent?Equivalent definitions of “evenly covered”Existence of real structure on CY m-foldModuli Space of elliptic fibrationEquivalence of two definitions of Spin structureEquivalent definitions of “meromorphic section”?Recovering data about the toric fan from minimal informationQuestion about differential forms and delta functions

1

1

$begingroup$

I've been trying to reconcile two seemingly different definitions of what a toric space is, specifically a toric Calabi-Yau 3-fold. The first definition is from the paper Branes and Toric Geometry, by Leung and Vafa (arXiv:hep-th/9711013) who say (on page 12, section 2.1):

We are interested in manifolds admitting a $T^n$ action, with an $n$-dimensional base.

This seems to suggest that a toric Calabi-Yau $3$-fold (generalizing the construction in the paper) is a $T^3$ fibration over a real $3$-dimensional base.

However, in the thesis Crystal Melting and Wall Crossing Phenomena, by Yamazaki (arXiv:1002.1709 [hep-th]), the author explicitly says (on page 16, in section 3.2):

A toric Calabi-Yau threefold $X_Delta$ is a $T^2 times mathbbR$ fibration over $mathbbR^3$, where the fibers are special Lagrangian submanifolds.

Now I understand that the phrase "special Lagrangian submanifold" implies the existence in $X_Delta$ of a special Lagrangian submanifold. But I would like to know the sense in which these two seemingly different definitions are equivalent. Any references to a further discussion about toric spaces would is very welcome! (I am a physicist learning about the underlying mathematical structures. I would not like to shy away from the formal definitions, so math references are particularly welcome.)

algebraic-topology mathematical-physics complex-geometry toric-geometry string-theory

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 22 at 14:31

Andrews

1,2812423

asked Mar 9 at 21:02

leastactionleastaction

283111

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  The answer is in section 4.3 of Vincent Bouchard's lecture notes at arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0702063. I would like to see the Lagrangian submanifold structure more explicitly but I guess I just need to work it out.
  $endgroup$
  – leastaction
  Mar 30 at 15:22
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

1

$begingroup$

I've been trying to reconcile two seemingly different definitions of what a toric space is, specifically a toric Calabi-Yau 3-fold. The first definition is from the paper Branes and Toric Geometry, by Leung and Vafa (arXiv:hep-th/9711013) who say (on page 12, section 2.1):

We are interested in manifolds admitting a $T^n$ action, with an $n$-dimensional base.

This seems to suggest that a toric Calabi-Yau $3$-fold (generalizing the construction in the paper) is a $T^3$ fibration over a real $3$-dimensional base.

However, in the thesis Crystal Melting and Wall Crossing Phenomena, by Yamazaki (arXiv:1002.1709 [hep-th]), the author explicitly says (on page 16, in section 3.2):

A toric Calabi-Yau threefold $X_Delta$ is a $T^2 times mathbbR$ fibration over $mathbbR^3$, where the fibers are special Lagrangian submanifolds.

Now I understand that the phrase "special Lagrangian submanifold" implies the existence in $X_Delta$ of a special Lagrangian submanifold. But I would like to know the sense in which these two seemingly different definitions are equivalent. Any references to a further discussion about toric spaces would is very welcome! (I am a physicist learning about the underlying mathematical structures. I would not like to shy away from the formal definitions, so math references are particularly welcome.)

algebraic-topology mathematical-physics complex-geometry toric-geometry string-theory

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 22 at 14:31

Andrews

1,2812423

asked Mar 9 at 21:02

leastactionleastaction

283111

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  The answer is in section 4.3 of Vincent Bouchard's lecture notes at arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0702063. I would like to see the Lagrangian submanifold structure more explicitly but I guess I just need to work it out.
  $endgroup$
  – leastaction
  Mar 30 at 15:22
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

I've been trying to reconcile two seemingly different definitions of what a toric space is, specifically a toric Calabi-Yau 3-fold. The first definition is from the paper Branes and Toric Geometry, by Leung and Vafa (arXiv:hep-th/9711013) who say (on page 12, section 2.1):

We are interested in manifolds admitting a $T^n$ action, with an $n$-dimensional base.

This seems to suggest that a toric Calabi-Yau $3$-fold (generalizing the construction in the paper) is a $T^3$ fibration over a real $3$-dimensional base.

However, in the thesis Crystal Melting and Wall Crossing Phenomena, by Yamazaki (arXiv:1002.1709 [hep-th]), the author explicitly says (on page 16, in section 3.2):

A toric Calabi-Yau threefold $X_Delta$ is a $T^2 times mathbbR$ fibration over $mathbbR^3$, where the fibers are special Lagrangian submanifolds.

Now I understand that the phrase "special Lagrangian submanifold" implies the existence in $X_Delta$ of a special Lagrangian submanifold. But I would like to know the sense in which these two seemingly different definitions are equivalent. Any references to a further discussion about toric spaces would is very welcome! (I am a physicist learning about the underlying mathematical structures. I would not like to shy away from the formal definitions, so math references are particularly welcome.)

algebraic-topology mathematical-physics complex-geometry toric-geometry string-theory

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 22 at 14:31

Andrews

1,2812423

asked Mar 9 at 21:02

leastactionleastaction

283111

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 22 at 14:31

Andrews

1,2812423

asked Mar 9 at 21:02

leastactionleastaction

283111

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 22 at 14:31

Andrews

1,2812423

asked Mar 9 at 21:02

leastactionleastaction

283111

edited Mar 22 at 14:31

Andrews

1,2812423

edited Mar 22 at 14:31

Andrews

1,2812423

asked Mar 9 at 21:02

leastactionleastaction

283111

asked Mar 9 at 21:02

leastactionleastaction

283111