How to prove that complex numbers (C) are linear space over real numbers (R) field?Can the field of complex numbers be regarded as a vector space?Let $V=C^n$ be the $n$-dimensional space of $n$-vectors over the field $Bbb C$.Find the dimension and a basis for each vector space.Vector space of real vectors over field complex scalars.Real numbers as a $mathbbQ$-linear spaceLinear transformation on the vector space of complex numbers over the reals that isn't a linear transformation on $mathbbC^1$.Vector spaces over a Field in linear algebraHow can $V$ be a vector space over the field of real numbers when it is explicitly defined as being over the field of complex numbers?Normal matrix over real inner product space with real eigenvalues is HermitianLinear transformation over real field vs. complex fieldany field that is a superset of the real numbers is also a vector space over the real numbers?Vector field and real numbersLinear combinations over the complex field, why complex coefficients?
What do you call words made from common English words?
Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?
Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money
When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?
What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?
What causes the sudden spool-up sound from an F-16 when enabling afterburner?
extract characters between two commas?
Can the Produce Flame cantrip be used to grapple, or as an unarmed strike, in the right circumstances?
Manga about a female worker who got dragged into another world together with this high school girl and she was just told she's not needed anymore
Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?
Shall I use personal or official e-mail account when registering to external websites for work purpose?
How to deal with fear of taking dependencies
Hosting Wordpress in a EC2 Load Balanced Instance
Typesetting a double Over Dot on top of a symbol
Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium
How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?
Crop image to path created in TikZ?
Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?
Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"
I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine
Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?
Check if two datetimes are between two others
Does the average primeness of natural numbers tend to zero?
How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?
How to prove that complex numbers (C) are linear space over real numbers (R) field?
Can the field of complex numbers be regarded as a vector space?Let $V=C^n$ be the $n$-dimensional space of $n$-vectors over the field $Bbb C$.Find the dimension and a basis for each vector space.Vector space of real vectors over field complex scalars.Real numbers as a $mathbbQ$-linear spaceLinear transformation on the vector space of complex numbers over the reals that isn't a linear transformation on $mathbbC^1$.Vector spaces over a Field in linear algebraHow can $V$ be a vector space over the field of real numbers when it is explicitly defined as being over the field of complex numbers?Normal matrix over real inner product space with real eigenvalues is HermitianLinear transformation over real field vs. complex fieldany field that is a superset of the real numbers is also a vector space over the real numbers?Vector field and real numbersLinear combinations over the complex field, why complex coefficients?
$begingroup$
how to prove that complex numbers $mathbbC$ are linear space over real numbers field $mathbbR$ ? it's a linear algebra question
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jun 29 '11 at 19:58
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
how to prove that complex numbers $mathbbC$ are linear space over real numbers field $mathbbR$ ? it's a linear algebra question
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jun 29 '11 at 19:58
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
4
$begingroup$
You need math overflow.
$endgroup$
– duffymo
Jun 29 '11 at 19:19
1
$begingroup$
Or even just Math.SE.
$endgroup$
– Dan
Jun 29 '11 at 19:20
$begingroup$
Which axioms are you having trouble verifying?
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jun 29 '11 at 20:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
how to prove that complex numbers $mathbbC$ are linear space over real numbers field $mathbbR$ ? it's a linear algebra question
linear-algebra
$endgroup$
how to prove that complex numbers $mathbbC$ are linear space over real numbers field $mathbbR$ ? it's a linear algebra question
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
edited Jun 29 '11 at 20:10
Arturo Magidin
266k34590921
266k34590921
asked Jun 29 '11 at 19:18
MaysamMaysam
297249
297249
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jun 29 '11 at 19:58
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
migrated from stackoverflow.com Jun 29 '11 at 19:58
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
4
$begingroup$
You need math overflow.
$endgroup$
– duffymo
Jun 29 '11 at 19:19
1
$begingroup$
Or even just Math.SE.
$endgroup$
– Dan
Jun 29 '11 at 19:20
$begingroup$
Which axioms are you having trouble verifying?
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jun 29 '11 at 20:11
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
You need math overflow.
$endgroup$
– duffymo
Jun 29 '11 at 19:19
1
$begingroup$
Or even just Math.SE.
$endgroup$
– Dan
Jun 29 '11 at 19:20
$begingroup$
Which axioms are you having trouble verifying?
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jun 29 '11 at 20:11
4
4
$begingroup$
You need math overflow.
$endgroup$
– duffymo
Jun 29 '11 at 19:19
$begingroup$
You need math overflow.
$endgroup$
– duffymo
Jun 29 '11 at 19:19
1
1
$begingroup$
Or even just Math.SE.
$endgroup$
– Dan
Jun 29 '11 at 19:20
$begingroup$
Or even just Math.SE.
$endgroup$
– Dan
Jun 29 '11 at 19:20
$begingroup$
Which axioms are you having trouble verifying?
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jun 29 '11 at 20:11
$begingroup$
Which axioms are you having trouble verifying?
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jun 29 '11 at 20:11
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The term "linear space" is another word for vector space. There are two aspects to showing that something (call it $V$) is a vector space over a field $K$ (in this case, $K=mathbbR$, the real numbers):
First, you need to specify a vector addition operation "$star$", that takes any two elements of $V$ and produces another one, and a scalar multiplication operation "$circ$", that takes an element of $K$ and an element of $V$ and produces an element of $V$. Second, you need to show that those operations satisfy the axioms for being a vector space.
Here, the set $V$ under consideration is $mathbbC$, the complex numbers. The vector addition is that is implied is just the usual addition of complex numbers; that is, we define
$$astar b:=a+btext for all a,binmathbbC.$$
The scalar multiplication (i.e., multiplying a vector (an element of $V$) by a scalar (an element of $K$)) that is implied is just the multiplication of a complex number by a real number; that is, we define
$$lambdacirc a:=lambda atext for all lambdainmathbbRtext and ainmathbbC.$$
The axioms for being a vector space are here. There is not really anything substantial you need to show. For example, $1circ a=a$ for any $ainmathbbC$ because, by definition,
$$1circ a=1a=a$$
(because $1inmathbbRsubsetmathbbC$ is the multiplicative identity of $mathbbC$'s usual multiplication). Another example:
$$lambdacirc (astar b)=lambda(a+b)=lambda a +lambda b=(lambdacirc a)star(lambdacirc b)$$
because multiplication of complex numbers distributes over addition.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Verify that it satisfies the axioms, of course!
- The sum of two complex numbers is a complex number.
- Multiplying a complex number by a real number yields a complex number.
- Addition of complex numbers is associative.
- Addition of complex numbers is commutative.
- The complex number $0$ is such that $z+0 = z$ for all complex numbers $z$.
- Given a complex number $z$, there is a complex number (namely, $-z$) such that $z+(-z) = 0$.
- Multiplication by reals numbers is associative: $alpha(beta z) = (alphabeta)z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zin mathbbC$.
- Multiplication by reals distributes over the sum of complex numbers: $alpha(z+w) = alpha z + alpha w$ for all $alphainmathbbR$, $z,winmathbbC$.
- Multiplication by a complex number distributes over the sum of real numbers: $(alpha+beta)z = alpha z + beta z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zinmathbbC$.
- Multiplication by the real number $1$ is the identity mapping: $1z = z$ for all $zinmathbbC$.
If all 10 are true, then $mathbbC$ is a vector space/linear space over $mathbbR$.
(More generally, if $mathbfF$ is a field, and $mathbfK$ is a field that contains $mathbfF$, then $mathbfK$ is a vector space over $mathbfF$).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$mathbbC = mathbbR(i) = a+ib:a,b in mathbbR $ ($mathbbR(i)$ is the smallest field which contains $mathbbR$ and $i$). You can see that it is a 2-dimention vector space on $mathbbR$ ( for example, you can verify that $1,i$ is a basis for it).
I hope I've helped you.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$mathbbC=a+bmathrmimid a,bspace mathrmfromspace mathbbR$ and $u, v$ vectors from $mathbbC$. $u=(a_1+b_1mathrmi)$ and $v=(a_2+b_2mathrmi)$.
To show that $mathbbC$ is a linear space over $mathbbR$, we can prove it by this:
$u+v=((a_1+b_1mathrmi)+(a_2+b_2mathrmi))=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1mathrmi+b_2mathrmi)=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1+b_2)i$ so the new vector formed by summary of two other vectors has the form $A+Bmathrmi$.
This means that the new vector is part of $mathbbC$, and by this we prove that $mathbbC$ is a linar space over $mathbbR$ field.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48510%2fhow-to-prove-that-complex-numbers-c-are-linear-space-over-real-numbers-r-fie%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The term "linear space" is another word for vector space. There are two aspects to showing that something (call it $V$) is a vector space over a field $K$ (in this case, $K=mathbbR$, the real numbers):
First, you need to specify a vector addition operation "$star$", that takes any two elements of $V$ and produces another one, and a scalar multiplication operation "$circ$", that takes an element of $K$ and an element of $V$ and produces an element of $V$. Second, you need to show that those operations satisfy the axioms for being a vector space.
Here, the set $V$ under consideration is $mathbbC$, the complex numbers. The vector addition is that is implied is just the usual addition of complex numbers; that is, we define
$$astar b:=a+btext for all a,binmathbbC.$$
The scalar multiplication (i.e., multiplying a vector (an element of $V$) by a scalar (an element of $K$)) that is implied is just the multiplication of a complex number by a real number; that is, we define
$$lambdacirc a:=lambda atext for all lambdainmathbbRtext and ainmathbbC.$$
The axioms for being a vector space are here. There is not really anything substantial you need to show. For example, $1circ a=a$ for any $ainmathbbC$ because, by definition,
$$1circ a=1a=a$$
(because $1inmathbbRsubsetmathbbC$ is the multiplicative identity of $mathbbC$'s usual multiplication). Another example:
$$lambdacirc (astar b)=lambda(a+b)=lambda a +lambda b=(lambdacirc a)star(lambdacirc b)$$
because multiplication of complex numbers distributes over addition.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The term "linear space" is another word for vector space. There are two aspects to showing that something (call it $V$) is a vector space over a field $K$ (in this case, $K=mathbbR$, the real numbers):
First, you need to specify a vector addition operation "$star$", that takes any two elements of $V$ and produces another one, and a scalar multiplication operation "$circ$", that takes an element of $K$ and an element of $V$ and produces an element of $V$. Second, you need to show that those operations satisfy the axioms for being a vector space.
Here, the set $V$ under consideration is $mathbbC$, the complex numbers. The vector addition is that is implied is just the usual addition of complex numbers; that is, we define
$$astar b:=a+btext for all a,binmathbbC.$$
The scalar multiplication (i.e., multiplying a vector (an element of $V$) by a scalar (an element of $K$)) that is implied is just the multiplication of a complex number by a real number; that is, we define
$$lambdacirc a:=lambda atext for all lambdainmathbbRtext and ainmathbbC.$$
The axioms for being a vector space are here. There is not really anything substantial you need to show. For example, $1circ a=a$ for any $ainmathbbC$ because, by definition,
$$1circ a=1a=a$$
(because $1inmathbbRsubsetmathbbC$ is the multiplicative identity of $mathbbC$'s usual multiplication). Another example:
$$lambdacirc (astar b)=lambda(a+b)=lambda a +lambda b=(lambdacirc a)star(lambdacirc b)$$
because multiplication of complex numbers distributes over addition.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The term "linear space" is another word for vector space. There are two aspects to showing that something (call it $V$) is a vector space over a field $K$ (in this case, $K=mathbbR$, the real numbers):
First, you need to specify a vector addition operation "$star$", that takes any two elements of $V$ and produces another one, and a scalar multiplication operation "$circ$", that takes an element of $K$ and an element of $V$ and produces an element of $V$. Second, you need to show that those operations satisfy the axioms for being a vector space.
Here, the set $V$ under consideration is $mathbbC$, the complex numbers. The vector addition is that is implied is just the usual addition of complex numbers; that is, we define
$$astar b:=a+btext for all a,binmathbbC.$$
The scalar multiplication (i.e., multiplying a vector (an element of $V$) by a scalar (an element of $K$)) that is implied is just the multiplication of a complex number by a real number; that is, we define
$$lambdacirc a:=lambda atext for all lambdainmathbbRtext and ainmathbbC.$$
The axioms for being a vector space are here. There is not really anything substantial you need to show. For example, $1circ a=a$ for any $ainmathbbC$ because, by definition,
$$1circ a=1a=a$$
(because $1inmathbbRsubsetmathbbC$ is the multiplicative identity of $mathbbC$'s usual multiplication). Another example:
$$lambdacirc (astar b)=lambda(a+b)=lambda a +lambda b=(lambdacirc a)star(lambdacirc b)$$
because multiplication of complex numbers distributes over addition.
$endgroup$
The term "linear space" is another word for vector space. There are two aspects to showing that something (call it $V$) is a vector space over a field $K$ (in this case, $K=mathbbR$, the real numbers):
First, you need to specify a vector addition operation "$star$", that takes any two elements of $V$ and produces another one, and a scalar multiplication operation "$circ$", that takes an element of $K$ and an element of $V$ and produces an element of $V$. Second, you need to show that those operations satisfy the axioms for being a vector space.
Here, the set $V$ under consideration is $mathbbC$, the complex numbers. The vector addition is that is implied is just the usual addition of complex numbers; that is, we define
$$astar b:=a+btext for all a,binmathbbC.$$
The scalar multiplication (i.e., multiplying a vector (an element of $V$) by a scalar (an element of $K$)) that is implied is just the multiplication of a complex number by a real number; that is, we define
$$lambdacirc a:=lambda atext for all lambdainmathbbRtext and ainmathbbC.$$
The axioms for being a vector space are here. There is not really anything substantial you need to show. For example, $1circ a=a$ for any $ainmathbbC$ because, by definition,
$$1circ a=1a=a$$
(because $1inmathbbRsubsetmathbbC$ is the multiplicative identity of $mathbbC$'s usual multiplication). Another example:
$$lambdacirc (astar b)=lambda(a+b)=lambda a +lambda b=(lambdacirc a)star(lambdacirc b)$$
because multiplication of complex numbers distributes over addition.
edited Jun 29 '11 at 20:24
answered Jun 29 '11 at 20:10
Zev ChonolesZev Chonoles
111k16233430
111k16233430
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Verify that it satisfies the axioms, of course!
- The sum of two complex numbers is a complex number.
- Multiplying a complex number by a real number yields a complex number.
- Addition of complex numbers is associative.
- Addition of complex numbers is commutative.
- The complex number $0$ is such that $z+0 = z$ for all complex numbers $z$.
- Given a complex number $z$, there is a complex number (namely, $-z$) such that $z+(-z) = 0$.
- Multiplication by reals numbers is associative: $alpha(beta z) = (alphabeta)z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zin mathbbC$.
- Multiplication by reals distributes over the sum of complex numbers: $alpha(z+w) = alpha z + alpha w$ for all $alphainmathbbR$, $z,winmathbbC$.
- Multiplication by a complex number distributes over the sum of real numbers: $(alpha+beta)z = alpha z + beta z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zinmathbbC$.
- Multiplication by the real number $1$ is the identity mapping: $1z = z$ for all $zinmathbbC$.
If all 10 are true, then $mathbbC$ is a vector space/linear space over $mathbbR$.
(More generally, if $mathbfF$ is a field, and $mathbfK$ is a field that contains $mathbfF$, then $mathbfK$ is a vector space over $mathbfF$).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Verify that it satisfies the axioms, of course!
- The sum of two complex numbers is a complex number.
- Multiplying a complex number by a real number yields a complex number.
- Addition of complex numbers is associative.
- Addition of complex numbers is commutative.
- The complex number $0$ is such that $z+0 = z$ for all complex numbers $z$.
- Given a complex number $z$, there is a complex number (namely, $-z$) such that $z+(-z) = 0$.
- Multiplication by reals numbers is associative: $alpha(beta z) = (alphabeta)z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zin mathbbC$.
- Multiplication by reals distributes over the sum of complex numbers: $alpha(z+w) = alpha z + alpha w$ for all $alphainmathbbR$, $z,winmathbbC$.
- Multiplication by a complex number distributes over the sum of real numbers: $(alpha+beta)z = alpha z + beta z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zinmathbbC$.
- Multiplication by the real number $1$ is the identity mapping: $1z = z$ for all $zinmathbbC$.
If all 10 are true, then $mathbbC$ is a vector space/linear space over $mathbbR$.
(More generally, if $mathbfF$ is a field, and $mathbfK$ is a field that contains $mathbfF$, then $mathbfK$ is a vector space over $mathbfF$).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Verify that it satisfies the axioms, of course!
- The sum of two complex numbers is a complex number.
- Multiplying a complex number by a real number yields a complex number.
- Addition of complex numbers is associative.
- Addition of complex numbers is commutative.
- The complex number $0$ is such that $z+0 = z$ for all complex numbers $z$.
- Given a complex number $z$, there is a complex number (namely, $-z$) such that $z+(-z) = 0$.
- Multiplication by reals numbers is associative: $alpha(beta z) = (alphabeta)z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zin mathbbC$.
- Multiplication by reals distributes over the sum of complex numbers: $alpha(z+w) = alpha z + alpha w$ for all $alphainmathbbR$, $z,winmathbbC$.
- Multiplication by a complex number distributes over the sum of real numbers: $(alpha+beta)z = alpha z + beta z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zinmathbbC$.
- Multiplication by the real number $1$ is the identity mapping: $1z = z$ for all $zinmathbbC$.
If all 10 are true, then $mathbbC$ is a vector space/linear space over $mathbbR$.
(More generally, if $mathbfF$ is a field, and $mathbfK$ is a field that contains $mathbfF$, then $mathbfK$ is a vector space over $mathbfF$).
$endgroup$
Verify that it satisfies the axioms, of course!
- The sum of two complex numbers is a complex number.
- Multiplying a complex number by a real number yields a complex number.
- Addition of complex numbers is associative.
- Addition of complex numbers is commutative.
- The complex number $0$ is such that $z+0 = z$ for all complex numbers $z$.
- Given a complex number $z$, there is a complex number (namely, $-z$) such that $z+(-z) = 0$.
- Multiplication by reals numbers is associative: $alpha(beta z) = (alphabeta)z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zin mathbbC$.
- Multiplication by reals distributes over the sum of complex numbers: $alpha(z+w) = alpha z + alpha w$ for all $alphainmathbbR$, $z,winmathbbC$.
- Multiplication by a complex number distributes over the sum of real numbers: $(alpha+beta)z = alpha z + beta z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zinmathbbC$.
- Multiplication by the real number $1$ is the identity mapping: $1z = z$ for all $zinmathbbC$.
If all 10 are true, then $mathbbC$ is a vector space/linear space over $mathbbR$.
(More generally, if $mathbfF$ is a field, and $mathbfK$ is a field that contains $mathbfF$, then $mathbfK$ is a vector space over $mathbfF$).
answered Jun 29 '11 at 20:14
Arturo MagidinArturo Magidin
266k34590921
266k34590921
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$mathbbC = mathbbR(i) = a+ib:a,b in mathbbR $ ($mathbbR(i)$ is the smallest field which contains $mathbbR$ and $i$). You can see that it is a 2-dimention vector space on $mathbbR$ ( for example, you can verify that $1,i$ is a basis for it).
I hope I've helped you.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$mathbbC = mathbbR(i) = a+ib:a,b in mathbbR $ ($mathbbR(i)$ is the smallest field which contains $mathbbR$ and $i$). You can see that it is a 2-dimention vector space on $mathbbR$ ( for example, you can verify that $1,i$ is a basis for it).
I hope I've helped you.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$mathbbC = mathbbR(i) = a+ib:a,b in mathbbR $ ($mathbbR(i)$ is the smallest field which contains $mathbbR$ and $i$). You can see that it is a 2-dimention vector space on $mathbbR$ ( for example, you can verify that $1,i$ is a basis for it).
I hope I've helped you.
$endgroup$
$mathbbC = mathbbR(i) = a+ib:a,b in mathbbR $ ($mathbbR(i)$ is the smallest field which contains $mathbbR$ and $i$). You can see that it is a 2-dimention vector space on $mathbbR$ ( for example, you can verify that $1,i$ is a basis for it).
I hope I've helped you.
answered Jun 29 '11 at 20:45
Thomas SantoliThomas Santoli
1764
1764
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$mathbbC=a+bmathrmimid a,bspace mathrmfromspace mathbbR$ and $u, v$ vectors from $mathbbC$. $u=(a_1+b_1mathrmi)$ and $v=(a_2+b_2mathrmi)$.
To show that $mathbbC$ is a linear space over $mathbbR$, we can prove it by this:
$u+v=((a_1+b_1mathrmi)+(a_2+b_2mathrmi))=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1mathrmi+b_2mathrmi)=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1+b_2)i$ so the new vector formed by summary of two other vectors has the form $A+Bmathrmi$.
This means that the new vector is part of $mathbbC$, and by this we prove that $mathbbC$ is a linar space over $mathbbR$ field.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$mathbbC=a+bmathrmimid a,bspace mathrmfromspace mathbbR$ and $u, v$ vectors from $mathbbC$. $u=(a_1+b_1mathrmi)$ and $v=(a_2+b_2mathrmi)$.
To show that $mathbbC$ is a linear space over $mathbbR$, we can prove it by this:
$u+v=((a_1+b_1mathrmi)+(a_2+b_2mathrmi))=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1mathrmi+b_2mathrmi)=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1+b_2)i$ so the new vector formed by summary of two other vectors has the form $A+Bmathrmi$.
This means that the new vector is part of $mathbbC$, and by this we prove that $mathbbC$ is a linar space over $mathbbR$ field.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$mathbbC=a+bmathrmimid a,bspace mathrmfromspace mathbbR$ and $u, v$ vectors from $mathbbC$. $u=(a_1+b_1mathrmi)$ and $v=(a_2+b_2mathrmi)$.
To show that $mathbbC$ is a linear space over $mathbbR$, we can prove it by this:
$u+v=((a_1+b_1mathrmi)+(a_2+b_2mathrmi))=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1mathrmi+b_2mathrmi)=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1+b_2)i$ so the new vector formed by summary of two other vectors has the form $A+Bmathrmi$.
This means that the new vector is part of $mathbbC$, and by this we prove that $mathbbC$ is a linar space over $mathbbR$ field.
$endgroup$
$mathbbC=a+bmathrmimid a,bspace mathrmfromspace mathbbR$ and $u, v$ vectors from $mathbbC$. $u=(a_1+b_1mathrmi)$ and $v=(a_2+b_2mathrmi)$.
To show that $mathbbC$ is a linear space over $mathbbR$, we can prove it by this:
$u+v=((a_1+b_1mathrmi)+(a_2+b_2mathrmi))=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1mathrmi+b_2mathrmi)=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1+b_2)i$ so the new vector formed by summary of two other vectors has the form $A+Bmathrmi$.
This means that the new vector is part of $mathbbC$, and by this we prove that $mathbbC$ is a linar space over $mathbbR$ field.
edited Apr 22 '18 at 11:53
MCCCS
1,3151822
1,3151822
answered Apr 22 '18 at 11:27
IrisIris
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48510%2fhow-to-prove-that-complex-numbers-c-are-linear-space-over-real-numbers-r-fie%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
You need math overflow.
$endgroup$
– duffymo
Jun 29 '11 at 19:19
1
$begingroup$
Or even just Math.SE.
$endgroup$
– Dan
Jun 29 '11 at 19:20
$begingroup$
Which axioms are you having trouble verifying?
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jun 29 '11 at 20:11