How to prove that complex numbers (C) are linear space over real numbers (R) field?Can the field of complex numbers be regarded as a vector space?Let $V=C^n$ be the $n$-dimensional space of $n$-vectors over the field $Bbb C$.Find the dimension and a basis for each vector space.Vector space of real vectors over field complex scalars.Real numbers as a $mathbbQ$-linear spaceLinear transformation on the vector space of complex numbers over the reals that isn't a linear transformation on $mathbbC^1$.Vector spaces over a Field in linear algebraHow can $V$ be a vector space over the field of real numbers when it is explicitly defined as being over the field of complex numbers?Normal matrix over real inner product space with real eigenvalues is HermitianLinear transformation over real field vs. complex fieldany field that is a superset of the real numbers is also a vector space over the real numbers?Vector field and real numbersLinear combinations over the complex field, why complex coefficients?

What do you call words made from common English words?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?

What causes the sudden spool-up sound from an F-16 when enabling afterburner?

extract characters between two commas?

Can the Produce Flame cantrip be used to grapple, or as an unarmed strike, in the right circumstances?

Manga about a female worker who got dragged into another world together with this high school girl and she was just told she's not needed anymore

Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?

Shall I use personal or official e-mail account when registering to external websites for work purpose?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

Hosting Wordpress in a EC2 Load Balanced Instance

Typesetting a double Over Dot on top of a symbol

Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium

How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?

Crop image to path created in TikZ?

Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Check if two datetimes are between two others

Does the average primeness of natural numbers tend to zero?

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?



How to prove that complex numbers (C) are linear space over real numbers (R) field?


Can the field of complex numbers be regarded as a vector space?Let $V=C^n$ be the $n$-dimensional space of $n$-vectors over the field $Bbb C$.Find the dimension and a basis for each vector space.Vector space of real vectors over field complex scalars.Real numbers as a $mathbbQ$-linear spaceLinear transformation on the vector space of complex numbers over the reals that isn't a linear transformation on $mathbbC^1$.Vector spaces over a Field in linear algebraHow can $V$ be a vector space over the field of real numbers when it is explicitly defined as being over the field of complex numbers?Normal matrix over real inner product space with real eigenvalues is HermitianLinear transformation over real field vs. complex fieldany field that is a superset of the real numbers is also a vector space over the real numbers?Vector field and real numbersLinear combinations over the complex field, why complex coefficients?













11












$begingroup$


how to prove that complex numbers $mathbbC$ are linear space over real numbers field $mathbbR$ ? it's a linear algebra question










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



migrated from stackoverflow.com Jun 29 '11 at 19:58


This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.













  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You need math overflow.
    $endgroup$
    – duffymo
    Jun 29 '11 at 19:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Or even just Math.SE.
    $endgroup$
    – Dan
    Jun 29 '11 at 19:20










  • $begingroup$
    Which axioms are you having trouble verifying?
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jun 29 '11 at 20:11















11












$begingroup$


how to prove that complex numbers $mathbbC$ are linear space over real numbers field $mathbbR$ ? it's a linear algebra question










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



migrated from stackoverflow.com Jun 29 '11 at 19:58


This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.













  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You need math overflow.
    $endgroup$
    – duffymo
    Jun 29 '11 at 19:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Or even just Math.SE.
    $endgroup$
    – Dan
    Jun 29 '11 at 19:20










  • $begingroup$
    Which axioms are you having trouble verifying?
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jun 29 '11 at 20:11













11












11








11


5



$begingroup$


how to prove that complex numbers $mathbbC$ are linear space over real numbers field $mathbbR$ ? it's a linear algebra question










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




how to prove that complex numbers $mathbbC$ are linear space over real numbers field $mathbbR$ ? it's a linear algebra question







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jun 29 '11 at 20:10









Arturo Magidin

266k34590921




266k34590921










asked Jun 29 '11 at 19:18









MaysamMaysam

297249




297249




migrated from stackoverflow.com Jun 29 '11 at 19:58


This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.









migrated from stackoverflow.com Jun 29 '11 at 19:58


This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.









  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You need math overflow.
    $endgroup$
    – duffymo
    Jun 29 '11 at 19:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Or even just Math.SE.
    $endgroup$
    – Dan
    Jun 29 '11 at 19:20










  • $begingroup$
    Which axioms are you having trouble verifying?
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jun 29 '11 at 20:11












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You need math overflow.
    $endgroup$
    – duffymo
    Jun 29 '11 at 19:19






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Or even just Math.SE.
    $endgroup$
    – Dan
    Jun 29 '11 at 19:20










  • $begingroup$
    Which axioms are you having trouble verifying?
    $endgroup$
    – Qiaochu Yuan
    Jun 29 '11 at 20:11







4




4




$begingroup$
You need math overflow.
$endgroup$
– duffymo
Jun 29 '11 at 19:19




$begingroup$
You need math overflow.
$endgroup$
– duffymo
Jun 29 '11 at 19:19




1




1




$begingroup$
Or even just Math.SE.
$endgroup$
– Dan
Jun 29 '11 at 19:20




$begingroup$
Or even just Math.SE.
$endgroup$
– Dan
Jun 29 '11 at 19:20












$begingroup$
Which axioms are you having trouble verifying?
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jun 29 '11 at 20:11




$begingroup$
Which axioms are you having trouble verifying?
$endgroup$
– Qiaochu Yuan
Jun 29 '11 at 20:11










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















9












$begingroup$

The term "linear space" is another word for vector space. There are two aspects to showing that something (call it $V$) is a vector space over a field $K$ (in this case, $K=mathbbR$, the real numbers):



First, you need to specify a vector addition operation "$star$", that takes any two elements of $V$ and produces another one, and a scalar multiplication operation "$circ$", that takes an element of $K$ and an element of $V$ and produces an element of $V$. Second, you need to show that those operations satisfy the axioms for being a vector space.



Here, the set $V$ under consideration is $mathbbC$, the complex numbers. The vector addition is that is implied is just the usual addition of complex numbers; that is, we define
$$astar b:=a+btext for all a,binmathbbC.$$
The scalar multiplication (i.e., multiplying a vector (an element of $V$) by a scalar (an element of $K$)) that is implied is just the multiplication of a complex number by a real number; that is, we define
$$lambdacirc a:=lambda atext for all lambdainmathbbRtext and ainmathbbC.$$



The axioms for being a vector space are here. There is not really anything substantial you need to show. For example, $1circ a=a$ for any $ainmathbbC$ because, by definition,
$$1circ a=1a=a$$
(because $1inmathbbRsubsetmathbbC$ is the multiplicative identity of $mathbbC$'s usual multiplication). Another example:
$$lambdacirc (astar b)=lambda(a+b)=lambda a +lambda b=(lambdacirc a)star(lambdacirc b)$$
because multiplication of complex numbers distributes over addition.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    13












    $begingroup$

    Verify that it satisfies the axioms, of course!



    1. The sum of two complex numbers is a complex number.

    2. Multiplying a complex number by a real number yields a complex number.

    3. Addition of complex numbers is associative.

    4. Addition of complex numbers is commutative.

    5. The complex number $0$ is such that $z+0 = z$ for all complex numbers $z$.

    6. Given a complex number $z$, there is a complex number (namely, $-z$) such that $z+(-z) = 0$.

    7. Multiplication by reals numbers is associative: $alpha(beta z) = (alphabeta)z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zin mathbbC$.

    8. Multiplication by reals distributes over the sum of complex numbers: $alpha(z+w) = alpha z + alpha w$ for all $alphainmathbbR$, $z,winmathbbC$.

    9. Multiplication by a complex number distributes over the sum of real numbers: $(alpha+beta)z = alpha z + beta z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zinmathbbC$.

    10. Multiplication by the real number $1$ is the identity mapping: $1z = z$ for all $zinmathbbC$.

    If all 10 are true, then $mathbbC$ is a vector space/linear space over $mathbbR$.



    (More generally, if $mathbfF$ is a field, and $mathbfK$ is a field that contains $mathbfF$, then $mathbfK$ is a vector space over $mathbfF$).






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      6












      $begingroup$

      $mathbbC = mathbbR(i) = a+ib:a,b in mathbbR $ ($mathbbR(i)$ is the smallest field which contains $mathbbR$ and $i$). You can see that it is a 2-dimention vector space on $mathbbR$ ( for example, you can verify that $1,i$ is a basis for it).



      I hope I've helped you.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        -1












        $begingroup$

        $mathbbC=a+bmathrmimid a,bspace mathrmfromspace mathbbR$ and $u, v$ vectors from $mathbbC$. $u=(a_1+b_1mathrmi)$ and $v=(a_2+b_2mathrmi)$.
        To show that $mathbbC$ is a linear space over $mathbbR$, we can prove it by this:
        $u+v=((a_1+b_1mathrmi)+(a_2+b_2mathrmi))=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1mathrmi+b_2mathrmi)=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1+b_2)i$ so the new vector formed by summary of two other vectors has the form $A+Bmathrmi$.
        This means that the new vector is part of $mathbbC$, and by this we prove that $mathbbC$ is a linar space over $mathbbR$ field.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48510%2fhow-to-prove-that-complex-numbers-c-are-linear-space-over-real-numbers-r-fie%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes








          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          9












          $begingroup$

          The term "linear space" is another word for vector space. There are two aspects to showing that something (call it $V$) is a vector space over a field $K$ (in this case, $K=mathbbR$, the real numbers):



          First, you need to specify a vector addition operation "$star$", that takes any two elements of $V$ and produces another one, and a scalar multiplication operation "$circ$", that takes an element of $K$ and an element of $V$ and produces an element of $V$. Second, you need to show that those operations satisfy the axioms for being a vector space.



          Here, the set $V$ under consideration is $mathbbC$, the complex numbers. The vector addition is that is implied is just the usual addition of complex numbers; that is, we define
          $$astar b:=a+btext for all a,binmathbbC.$$
          The scalar multiplication (i.e., multiplying a vector (an element of $V$) by a scalar (an element of $K$)) that is implied is just the multiplication of a complex number by a real number; that is, we define
          $$lambdacirc a:=lambda atext for all lambdainmathbbRtext and ainmathbbC.$$



          The axioms for being a vector space are here. There is not really anything substantial you need to show. For example, $1circ a=a$ for any $ainmathbbC$ because, by definition,
          $$1circ a=1a=a$$
          (because $1inmathbbRsubsetmathbbC$ is the multiplicative identity of $mathbbC$'s usual multiplication). Another example:
          $$lambdacirc (astar b)=lambda(a+b)=lambda a +lambda b=(lambdacirc a)star(lambdacirc b)$$
          because multiplication of complex numbers distributes over addition.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$

















            9












            $begingroup$

            The term "linear space" is another word for vector space. There are two aspects to showing that something (call it $V$) is a vector space over a field $K$ (in this case, $K=mathbbR$, the real numbers):



            First, you need to specify a vector addition operation "$star$", that takes any two elements of $V$ and produces another one, and a scalar multiplication operation "$circ$", that takes an element of $K$ and an element of $V$ and produces an element of $V$. Second, you need to show that those operations satisfy the axioms for being a vector space.



            Here, the set $V$ under consideration is $mathbbC$, the complex numbers. The vector addition is that is implied is just the usual addition of complex numbers; that is, we define
            $$astar b:=a+btext for all a,binmathbbC.$$
            The scalar multiplication (i.e., multiplying a vector (an element of $V$) by a scalar (an element of $K$)) that is implied is just the multiplication of a complex number by a real number; that is, we define
            $$lambdacirc a:=lambda atext for all lambdainmathbbRtext and ainmathbbC.$$



            The axioms for being a vector space are here. There is not really anything substantial you need to show. For example, $1circ a=a$ for any $ainmathbbC$ because, by definition,
            $$1circ a=1a=a$$
            (because $1inmathbbRsubsetmathbbC$ is the multiplicative identity of $mathbbC$'s usual multiplication). Another example:
            $$lambdacirc (astar b)=lambda(a+b)=lambda a +lambda b=(lambdacirc a)star(lambdacirc b)$$
            because multiplication of complex numbers distributes over addition.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$















              9












              9








              9





              $begingroup$

              The term "linear space" is another word for vector space. There are two aspects to showing that something (call it $V$) is a vector space over a field $K$ (in this case, $K=mathbbR$, the real numbers):



              First, you need to specify a vector addition operation "$star$", that takes any two elements of $V$ and produces another one, and a scalar multiplication operation "$circ$", that takes an element of $K$ and an element of $V$ and produces an element of $V$. Second, you need to show that those operations satisfy the axioms for being a vector space.



              Here, the set $V$ under consideration is $mathbbC$, the complex numbers. The vector addition is that is implied is just the usual addition of complex numbers; that is, we define
              $$astar b:=a+btext for all a,binmathbbC.$$
              The scalar multiplication (i.e., multiplying a vector (an element of $V$) by a scalar (an element of $K$)) that is implied is just the multiplication of a complex number by a real number; that is, we define
              $$lambdacirc a:=lambda atext for all lambdainmathbbRtext and ainmathbbC.$$



              The axioms for being a vector space are here. There is not really anything substantial you need to show. For example, $1circ a=a$ for any $ainmathbbC$ because, by definition,
              $$1circ a=1a=a$$
              (because $1inmathbbRsubsetmathbbC$ is the multiplicative identity of $mathbbC$'s usual multiplication). Another example:
              $$lambdacirc (astar b)=lambda(a+b)=lambda a +lambda b=(lambdacirc a)star(lambdacirc b)$$
              because multiplication of complex numbers distributes over addition.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              The term "linear space" is another word for vector space. There are two aspects to showing that something (call it $V$) is a vector space over a field $K$ (in this case, $K=mathbbR$, the real numbers):



              First, you need to specify a vector addition operation "$star$", that takes any two elements of $V$ and produces another one, and a scalar multiplication operation "$circ$", that takes an element of $K$ and an element of $V$ and produces an element of $V$. Second, you need to show that those operations satisfy the axioms for being a vector space.



              Here, the set $V$ under consideration is $mathbbC$, the complex numbers. The vector addition is that is implied is just the usual addition of complex numbers; that is, we define
              $$astar b:=a+btext for all a,binmathbbC.$$
              The scalar multiplication (i.e., multiplying a vector (an element of $V$) by a scalar (an element of $K$)) that is implied is just the multiplication of a complex number by a real number; that is, we define
              $$lambdacirc a:=lambda atext for all lambdainmathbbRtext and ainmathbbC.$$



              The axioms for being a vector space are here. There is not really anything substantial you need to show. For example, $1circ a=a$ for any $ainmathbbC$ because, by definition,
              $$1circ a=1a=a$$
              (because $1inmathbbRsubsetmathbbC$ is the multiplicative identity of $mathbbC$'s usual multiplication). Another example:
              $$lambdacirc (astar b)=lambda(a+b)=lambda a +lambda b=(lambdacirc a)star(lambdacirc b)$$
              because multiplication of complex numbers distributes over addition.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Jun 29 '11 at 20:24

























              answered Jun 29 '11 at 20:10









              Zev ChonolesZev Chonoles

              111k16233430




              111k16233430





















                  13












                  $begingroup$

                  Verify that it satisfies the axioms, of course!



                  1. The sum of two complex numbers is a complex number.

                  2. Multiplying a complex number by a real number yields a complex number.

                  3. Addition of complex numbers is associative.

                  4. Addition of complex numbers is commutative.

                  5. The complex number $0$ is such that $z+0 = z$ for all complex numbers $z$.

                  6. Given a complex number $z$, there is a complex number (namely, $-z$) such that $z+(-z) = 0$.

                  7. Multiplication by reals numbers is associative: $alpha(beta z) = (alphabeta)z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zin mathbbC$.

                  8. Multiplication by reals distributes over the sum of complex numbers: $alpha(z+w) = alpha z + alpha w$ for all $alphainmathbbR$, $z,winmathbbC$.

                  9. Multiplication by a complex number distributes over the sum of real numbers: $(alpha+beta)z = alpha z + beta z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zinmathbbC$.

                  10. Multiplication by the real number $1$ is the identity mapping: $1z = z$ for all $zinmathbbC$.

                  If all 10 are true, then $mathbbC$ is a vector space/linear space over $mathbbR$.



                  (More generally, if $mathbfF$ is a field, and $mathbfK$ is a field that contains $mathbfF$, then $mathbfK$ is a vector space over $mathbfF$).






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$

















                    13












                    $begingroup$

                    Verify that it satisfies the axioms, of course!



                    1. The sum of two complex numbers is a complex number.

                    2. Multiplying a complex number by a real number yields a complex number.

                    3. Addition of complex numbers is associative.

                    4. Addition of complex numbers is commutative.

                    5. The complex number $0$ is such that $z+0 = z$ for all complex numbers $z$.

                    6. Given a complex number $z$, there is a complex number (namely, $-z$) such that $z+(-z) = 0$.

                    7. Multiplication by reals numbers is associative: $alpha(beta z) = (alphabeta)z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zin mathbbC$.

                    8. Multiplication by reals distributes over the sum of complex numbers: $alpha(z+w) = alpha z + alpha w$ for all $alphainmathbbR$, $z,winmathbbC$.

                    9. Multiplication by a complex number distributes over the sum of real numbers: $(alpha+beta)z = alpha z + beta z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zinmathbbC$.

                    10. Multiplication by the real number $1$ is the identity mapping: $1z = z$ for all $zinmathbbC$.

                    If all 10 are true, then $mathbbC$ is a vector space/linear space over $mathbbR$.



                    (More generally, if $mathbfF$ is a field, and $mathbfK$ is a field that contains $mathbfF$, then $mathbfK$ is a vector space over $mathbfF$).






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$















                      13












                      13








                      13





                      $begingroup$

                      Verify that it satisfies the axioms, of course!



                      1. The sum of two complex numbers is a complex number.

                      2. Multiplying a complex number by a real number yields a complex number.

                      3. Addition of complex numbers is associative.

                      4. Addition of complex numbers is commutative.

                      5. The complex number $0$ is such that $z+0 = z$ for all complex numbers $z$.

                      6. Given a complex number $z$, there is a complex number (namely, $-z$) such that $z+(-z) = 0$.

                      7. Multiplication by reals numbers is associative: $alpha(beta z) = (alphabeta)z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zin mathbbC$.

                      8. Multiplication by reals distributes over the sum of complex numbers: $alpha(z+w) = alpha z + alpha w$ for all $alphainmathbbR$, $z,winmathbbC$.

                      9. Multiplication by a complex number distributes over the sum of real numbers: $(alpha+beta)z = alpha z + beta z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zinmathbbC$.

                      10. Multiplication by the real number $1$ is the identity mapping: $1z = z$ for all $zinmathbbC$.

                      If all 10 are true, then $mathbbC$ is a vector space/linear space over $mathbbR$.



                      (More generally, if $mathbfF$ is a field, and $mathbfK$ is a field that contains $mathbfF$, then $mathbfK$ is a vector space over $mathbfF$).






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      Verify that it satisfies the axioms, of course!



                      1. The sum of two complex numbers is a complex number.

                      2. Multiplying a complex number by a real number yields a complex number.

                      3. Addition of complex numbers is associative.

                      4. Addition of complex numbers is commutative.

                      5. The complex number $0$ is such that $z+0 = z$ for all complex numbers $z$.

                      6. Given a complex number $z$, there is a complex number (namely, $-z$) such that $z+(-z) = 0$.

                      7. Multiplication by reals numbers is associative: $alpha(beta z) = (alphabeta)z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zin mathbbC$.

                      8. Multiplication by reals distributes over the sum of complex numbers: $alpha(z+w) = alpha z + alpha w$ for all $alphainmathbbR$, $z,winmathbbC$.

                      9. Multiplication by a complex number distributes over the sum of real numbers: $(alpha+beta)z = alpha z + beta z$ for all $alpha,betainmathbbR$, $zinmathbbC$.

                      10. Multiplication by the real number $1$ is the identity mapping: $1z = z$ for all $zinmathbbC$.

                      If all 10 are true, then $mathbbC$ is a vector space/linear space over $mathbbR$.



                      (More generally, if $mathbfF$ is a field, and $mathbfK$ is a field that contains $mathbfF$, then $mathbfK$ is a vector space over $mathbfF$).







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Jun 29 '11 at 20:14









                      Arturo MagidinArturo Magidin

                      266k34590921




                      266k34590921





















                          6












                          $begingroup$

                          $mathbbC = mathbbR(i) = a+ib:a,b in mathbbR $ ($mathbbR(i)$ is the smallest field which contains $mathbbR$ and $i$). You can see that it is a 2-dimention vector space on $mathbbR$ ( for example, you can verify that $1,i$ is a basis for it).



                          I hope I've helped you.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$

















                            6












                            $begingroup$

                            $mathbbC = mathbbR(i) = a+ib:a,b in mathbbR $ ($mathbbR(i)$ is the smallest field which contains $mathbbR$ and $i$). You can see that it is a 2-dimention vector space on $mathbbR$ ( for example, you can verify that $1,i$ is a basis for it).



                            I hope I've helped you.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$















                              6












                              6








                              6





                              $begingroup$

                              $mathbbC = mathbbR(i) = a+ib:a,b in mathbbR $ ($mathbbR(i)$ is the smallest field which contains $mathbbR$ and $i$). You can see that it is a 2-dimention vector space on $mathbbR$ ( for example, you can verify that $1,i$ is a basis for it).



                              I hope I've helped you.






                              share|cite|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              $mathbbC = mathbbR(i) = a+ib:a,b in mathbbR $ ($mathbbR(i)$ is the smallest field which contains $mathbbR$ and $i$). You can see that it is a 2-dimention vector space on $mathbbR$ ( for example, you can verify that $1,i$ is a basis for it).



                              I hope I've helped you.







                              share|cite|improve this answer












                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer










                              answered Jun 29 '11 at 20:45









                              Thomas SantoliThomas Santoli

                              1764




                              1764





















                                  -1












                                  $begingroup$

                                  $mathbbC=a+bmathrmimid a,bspace mathrmfromspace mathbbR$ and $u, v$ vectors from $mathbbC$. $u=(a_1+b_1mathrmi)$ and $v=(a_2+b_2mathrmi)$.
                                  To show that $mathbbC$ is a linear space over $mathbbR$, we can prove it by this:
                                  $u+v=((a_1+b_1mathrmi)+(a_2+b_2mathrmi))=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1mathrmi+b_2mathrmi)=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1+b_2)i$ so the new vector formed by summary of two other vectors has the form $A+Bmathrmi$.
                                  This means that the new vector is part of $mathbbC$, and by this we prove that $mathbbC$ is a linar space over $mathbbR$ field.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$

















                                    -1












                                    $begingroup$

                                    $mathbbC=a+bmathrmimid a,bspace mathrmfromspace mathbbR$ and $u, v$ vectors from $mathbbC$. $u=(a_1+b_1mathrmi)$ and $v=(a_2+b_2mathrmi)$.
                                    To show that $mathbbC$ is a linear space over $mathbbR$, we can prove it by this:
                                    $u+v=((a_1+b_1mathrmi)+(a_2+b_2mathrmi))=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1mathrmi+b_2mathrmi)=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1+b_2)i$ so the new vector formed by summary of two other vectors has the form $A+Bmathrmi$.
                                    This means that the new vector is part of $mathbbC$, and by this we prove that $mathbbC$ is a linar space over $mathbbR$ field.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$















                                      -1












                                      -1








                                      -1





                                      $begingroup$

                                      $mathbbC=a+bmathrmimid a,bspace mathrmfromspace mathbbR$ and $u, v$ vectors from $mathbbC$. $u=(a_1+b_1mathrmi)$ and $v=(a_2+b_2mathrmi)$.
                                      To show that $mathbbC$ is a linear space over $mathbbR$, we can prove it by this:
                                      $u+v=((a_1+b_1mathrmi)+(a_2+b_2mathrmi))=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1mathrmi+b_2mathrmi)=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1+b_2)i$ so the new vector formed by summary of two other vectors has the form $A+Bmathrmi$.
                                      This means that the new vector is part of $mathbbC$, and by this we prove that $mathbbC$ is a linar space over $mathbbR$ field.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer











                                      $endgroup$



                                      $mathbbC=a+bmathrmimid a,bspace mathrmfromspace mathbbR$ and $u, v$ vectors from $mathbbC$. $u=(a_1+b_1mathrmi)$ and $v=(a_2+b_2mathrmi)$.
                                      To show that $mathbbC$ is a linear space over $mathbbR$, we can prove it by this:
                                      $u+v=((a_1+b_1mathrmi)+(a_2+b_2mathrmi))=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1mathrmi+b_2mathrmi)=(a_1+a_2)+(b_1+b_2)i$ so the new vector formed by summary of two other vectors has the form $A+Bmathrmi$.
                                      This means that the new vector is part of $mathbbC$, and by this we prove that $mathbbC$ is a linar space over $mathbbR$ field.







                                      share|cite|improve this answer














                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer








                                      edited Apr 22 '18 at 11:53









                                      MCCCS

                                      1,3151822




                                      1,3151822










                                      answered Apr 22 '18 at 11:27









                                      IrisIris

                                      11




                                      11



























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded
















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48510%2fhow-to-prove-that-complex-numbers-c-are-linear-space-over-real-numbers-r-fie%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

                                          random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

                                          Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye