Fdtxjr

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?

Why doesn't a const reference extend the life of a temporary object passed via a function?

Does bootstrapped regression allow for inference?

aging parents with no investments

Why was the "bread communication" in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

LWC and complex parameters

Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

What is it called when one voice type sings a 'solo'?

Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet

Can a planet have a different gravitational pull depending on its location in orbit around its sun?

How to move the player while also allowing forces to affect it

What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?

Why do we use polarized capacitors?

What to wear for invited talk in Canada

Copycat chess is back

What is the command to reset a PC without deleting any files

What does 'script /dev/null' do?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Are objects structures and/or vice versa?

If $limsup fraca_n+1a_n

Does $sumfracsin nn$ converge?Suppose $a_n geq 0$, and $sum a_n$ diverges, and $lim a_n = 0$. Show that $sum fraca_n1+a_n$ diverges.Proving $limsupfrac 1 a_n=frac 1 liminf a_n$ and $limsup a_ncdot limsup frac 1 a_n ge 1$Does $sum_1^infty fracnn^2 + 4$ converge or diverge? Is my solution correct?Suppose $suma_n$ converges. How do I prove that $sumfracsqrta_nn$ convergesGiven that $lim _n to infty a_n = 0$, does $displaystyle sum _n=1^infty |na_n|$ converge?prove convergence: $limsup a_n/b_n < ∞$, $sum b_n$ convergent implies $sum a_n$ convergentIf $a_n$ is sequence of positive numbers such that $sum a_n$ converges, then does $sum frac (a_n)^frac 14n^frac 45$ converge?Convergence of $sumlimits_n=1^inftya_n$ implies convergence of $sumlimits_n=1^inftya_n^sigma_n$ where $sigma_n=fracnn+1$?Does $fraca_n+1a_n < (fracnn+1)^2$ imply $sum a_n <infty$ here?

1

$begingroup$

I was wondering why the Ratio test has the $lim$ sign and the root test the $limsup$ sign.

• Quotient test: $lim|fraca_n+1a_n|<1Rightarrow sum a_n$
  converges.


• Ratio test: $limsup sqrt[n]<1Rightarrow sum a_n$
  converges.

If I pick
$$a_n=begincases2^-fracn2 &mboxn even\3^-fracn+12 &mboxn odd endcases,$$
then for $fraca_n+1a_n$ we either have $(3/2)^fracn+12$ or $(2/3)^fracn2cdot 3$. It is not bounded therefore the limit does not exist, and $limsup=infty$ makes no difference.

The textbook says that this example shows that a Quotient test analogously to the Ratio test with $limsup|fraca_n+1a_n|$ instead of $lim|fraca_n+1a_n|$ is not true.

What does this sentence mean why does it justify that if we have $limsup<1$ we do not have necessarily $sum a_n<infty$. Because that is what I am getting out of it.

Edit:

I have understood it now the Ratio test also says if $lim fraca_n+1a_n>1$ the series diverges. If I would change this with $limsup$ then we would get a contradiction with the root test

real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-explanation

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 22 at 16:25

Micah

30.3k1364106

asked Mar 22 at 15:42

New2MathNew2Math

16715

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Yes. Look carefully at the proof of the ratio test and you'll see the limit is not required to exist.
  $endgroup$
  – Umberto P.
  Mar 22 at 15:49
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @new2math Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
  $endgroup$
  – Mark Viola
  Apr 3 at 3:31
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

$begingroup$

I was wondering why the Ratio test has the $lim$ sign and the root test the $limsup$ sign.

• Quotient test: $lim|fraca_n+1a_n|<1Rightarrow sum a_n$
  converges.


• Ratio test: $limsup sqrt[n]<1Rightarrow sum a_n$
  converges.

If I pick
$$a_n=begincases2^-fracn2 &mboxn even\3^-fracn+12 &mboxn odd endcases,$$
then for $fraca_n+1a_n$ we either have $(3/2)^fracn+12$ or $(2/3)^fracn2cdot 3$. It is not bounded therefore the limit does not exist, and $limsup=infty$ makes no difference.

The textbook says that this example shows that a Quotient test analogously to the Ratio test with $limsup|fraca_n+1a_n|$ instead of $lim|fraca_n+1a_n|$ is not true.

What does this sentence mean why does it justify that if we have $limsup<1$ we do not have necessarily $sum a_n<infty$. Because that is what I am getting out of it.

Edit:

I have understood it now the Ratio test also says if $lim fraca_n+1a_n>1$ the series diverges. If I would change this with $limsup$ then we would get a contradiction with the root test

real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-explanation

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 22 at 16:25

Micah

30.3k1364106

asked Mar 22 at 15:42

New2MathNew2Math

16715

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Yes. Look carefully at the proof of the ratio test and you'll see the limit is not required to exist.
  $endgroup$
  – Umberto P.
  Mar 22 at 15:49
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @new2math Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can.
  $endgroup$
  – Mark Viola
  Apr 3 at 3:31
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

I was wondering why the Ratio test has the $lim$ sign and the root test the $limsup$ sign.

• Quotient test: $lim|fraca_n+1a_n|<1Rightarrow sum a_n$
  converges.


• Ratio test: $limsup sqrt[n]<1Rightarrow sum a_n$
  converges.

If I pick
$$a_n=begincases2^-fracn2 &mboxn even\3^-fracn+12 &mboxn odd endcases,$$
then for $fraca_n+1a_n$ we either have $(3/2)^fracn+12$ or $(2/3)^fracn2cdot 3$. It is not bounded therefore the limit does not exist, and $limsup=infty$ makes no difference.

The textbook says that this example shows that a Quotient test analogously to the Ratio test with $limsup|fraca_n+1a_n|$ instead of $lim|fraca_n+1a_n|$ is not true.

What does this sentence mean why does it justify that if we have $limsup<1$ we do not have necessarily $sum a_n<infty$. Because that is what I am getting out of it.

Edit:

I have understood it now the Ratio test also says if $lim fraca_n+1a_n>1$ the series diverges. If I would change this with $limsup$ then we would get a contradiction with the root test

real-analysis sequences-and-series proof-explanation

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 22 at 16:25

Micah

30.3k1364106

asked Mar 22 at 15:42

New2MathNew2Math

16715

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 22 at 16:25

Micah

30.3k1364106

asked Mar 22 at 15:42

New2MathNew2Math

16715

share|cite|improve this question

edited Mar 22 at 16:25

Micah

30.3k1364106

asked Mar 22 at 15:42

New2MathNew2Math

16715

edited Mar 22 at 16:25

Micah

30.3k1364106

edited Mar 22 at 16:25

Micah

30.3k1364106

asked Mar 22 at 15:42

New2MathNew2Math

16715

asked Mar 22 at 15:42

New2MathNew2Math

16715

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

0

$begingroup$

If $limsup_nleftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert<1$, then take some $cinleft(limsup_nleftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert,1right)$. Then $limsup_nleftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert<c$ and so, for some $Ninmathbb N$, if $ngeqslant N$, then $leftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert<c$. But then $lvert a_N+1rvert<clvert a_Nrvert$, $lvert a_N+2rvert<c^2lvert a_Nrvert$ and so on. So, yes, the series $sum_n=0^infty a_n$ converges absolutely. There is no difference between the ratio test and the quotient test as far as this is concerned.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered Mar 22 at 15:49

José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

173k23133241

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

0

$begingroup$

The ratio test can be expressed as follows.

Let $ell=liminf_nto inftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|$ and let $L=limsup_nto inftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|$. Then, the series $$sum_n=1^infty a_nbegincases
textconverges (absolutey)&, L<1\\
textdiverges &, ell>1\\
textdiverges &, left|fraca_n+1a_nright|ge1,textfor,n,textlarge\\
textinconclusive&,textotherwise
endcases$$

---

The root test is stronger than the ratio test since

$$liminf_ntoinftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|le liminf_nto inftysqrt[n]le limsup_ntoinftysqrt[n]le limsup_ntoinftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|$$

In the example in the OP, the ratio test in inconclusive since $L=infty$ and $ell=0$. However, the root test reveals

$$limsup_ntoinftysqrt[n]=2^-1/2<1$$

and the series converges.

share|cite|improve this answer

edited Mar 22 at 16:19

answered Mar 22 at 15:58

Mark ViolaMark Viola

134k1278177

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3158310%2fif-limsup-fraca-n1a-n1-does-sum-a-n-converge-even-if-lim-fraca%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

0

$begingroup$

If $limsup_nleftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert<1$, then take some $cinleft(limsup_nleftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert,1right)$. Then $limsup_nleftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert<c$ and so, for some $Ninmathbb N$, if $ngeqslant N$, then $leftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert<c$. But then $lvert a_N+1rvert<clvert a_Nrvert$, $lvert a_N+2rvert<c^2lvert a_Nrvert$ and so on. So, yes, the series $sum_n=0^infty a_n$ converges absolutely. There is no difference between the ratio test and the quotient test as far as this is concerned.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered Mar 22 at 15:49

José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

173k23133241

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

0

$begingroup$

If $limsup_nleftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert<1$, then take some $cinleft(limsup_nleftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert,1right)$. Then $limsup_nleftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert<c$ and so, for some $Ninmathbb N$, if $ngeqslant N$, then $leftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert<c$. But then $lvert a_N+1rvert<clvert a_Nrvert$, $lvert a_N+2rvert<c^2lvert a_Nrvert$ and so on. So, yes, the series $sum_n=0^infty a_n$ converges absolutely. There is no difference between the ratio test and the quotient test as far as this is concerned.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered Mar 22 at 15:49

José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

173k23133241

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

If $limsup_nleftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert<1$, then take some $cinleft(limsup_nleftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert,1right)$. Then $limsup_nleftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert<c$ and so, for some $Ninmathbb N$, if $ngeqslant N$, then $leftlvertfraca_n+1a_nrightrvert<c$. But then $lvert a_N+1rvert<clvert a_Nrvert$, $lvert a_N+2rvert<c^2lvert a_Nrvert$ and so on. So, yes, the series $sum_n=0^infty a_n$ converges absolutely. There is no difference between the ratio test and the quotient test as far as this is concerned.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered Mar 22 at 15:49

José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

173k23133241

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered Mar 22 at 15:49

José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

173k23133241

answered Mar 22 at 15:49

José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

173k23133241

answered Mar 22 at 15:49

José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

173k23133241

0

$begingroup$

The ratio test can be expressed as follows.

Let $ell=liminf_nto inftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|$ and let $L=limsup_nto inftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|$. Then, the series $$sum_n=1^infty a_nbegincases
textconverges (absolutey)&, L<1\\
textdiverges &, ell>1\\
textdiverges &, left|fraca_n+1a_nright|ge1,textfor,n,textlarge\\
textinconclusive&,textotherwise
endcases$$

---

The root test is stronger than the ratio test since

$$liminf_ntoinftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|le liminf_nto inftysqrt[n]le limsup_ntoinftysqrt[n]le limsup_ntoinftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|$$

In the example in the OP, the ratio test in inconclusive since $L=infty$ and $ell=0$. However, the root test reveals

$$limsup_ntoinftysqrt[n]=2^-1/2<1$$

and the series converges.

share|cite|improve this answer

edited Mar 22 at 16:19

answered Mar 22 at 15:58

Mark ViolaMark Viola

134k1278177

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

0

$begingroup$

The ratio test can be expressed as follows.

Let $ell=liminf_nto inftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|$ and let $L=limsup_nto inftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|$. Then, the series $$sum_n=1^infty a_nbegincases
textconverges (absolutey)&, L<1\\
textdiverges &, ell>1\\
textdiverges &, left|fraca_n+1a_nright|ge1,textfor,n,textlarge\\
textinconclusive&,textotherwise
endcases$$

---

The root test is stronger than the ratio test since

$$liminf_ntoinftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|le liminf_nto inftysqrt[n]le limsup_ntoinftysqrt[n]le limsup_ntoinftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|$$

In the example in the OP, the ratio test in inconclusive since $L=infty$ and $ell=0$. However, the root test reveals

$$limsup_ntoinftysqrt[n]=2^-1/2<1$$

and the series converges.

share|cite|improve this answer

edited Mar 22 at 16:19

answered Mar 22 at 15:58

Mark ViolaMark Viola

134k1278177

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

The ratio test can be expressed as follows.

Let $ell=liminf_nto inftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|$ and let $L=limsup_nto inftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|$. Then, the series $$sum_n=1^infty a_nbegincases
textconverges (absolutey)&, L<1\\
textdiverges &, ell>1\\
textdiverges &, left|fraca_n+1a_nright|ge1,textfor,n,textlarge\\
textinconclusive&,textotherwise
endcases$$

---

The root test is stronger than the ratio test since

$$liminf_ntoinftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|le liminf_nto inftysqrt[n]le limsup_ntoinftysqrt[n]le limsup_ntoinftyleft|fraca_n+1a_nright|$$

In the example in the OP, the ratio test in inconclusive since $L=infty$ and $ell=0$. However, the root test reveals

$$limsup_ntoinftysqrt[n]=2^-1/2<1$$

and the series converges.

share|cite|improve this answer

edited Mar 22 at 16:19

answered Mar 22 at 15:58

Mark ViolaMark Viola

134k1278177

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

edited Mar 22 at 16:19

answered Mar 22 at 15:58

Mark ViolaMark Viola

134k1278177

answered Mar 22 at 15:58

Mark ViolaMark Viola

134k1278177

answered Mar 22 at 15:58

Mark ViolaMark Viola

134k1278177