Calculate the running time of the code snippet below Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Help with find recurrence relation running time.Algorithm Running Timerunning time of an algorithmNeed to understand the end of Karatsuba algorithm running time proofCalculating Running Time of Recurrence RelationsStuck: To show that the divide and conquer relation represent Merge SortUnderstanding the running time of an algorithm that is with respect to input size nDifference between asymptotic bound and running timeWhat can be said about the time complexity of given Code snippet?how to work out a computer program running time

What initially awakened the Balrog?

Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?

QGIS virtual layer functionality does not seem to support memory layers

How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?

Put R under double integral

Should there be a hyphen in the construction "IT affin"?

How to make a Field only accept Numbers in Magento 2

Why do we bend a book to keep it straight?

Is this another way of expressing the side limit?

Do I really need to have a message in a novel to appeal to readers?

Find 108 by using 3,4,6

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours

What does Turing mean by this statement?

Is there any word for a place full of confusion?

Belief In God or Knowledge Of God. Which is better?

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?

Has negative voting ever been officially implemented in elections, or seriously proposed, or even studied?

Why is Nikon 1.4g better when Nikon 1.8g is sharper?

Is there a kind of relay that only consumes power when switching?

How does the math work when buying airline miles?

Would it be possible to dictate a bech32 address as a list of English words?

What do you call the main part of a joke?

Why limits give us the exact value of the slope of the tangent line?



Calculate the running time of the code snippet below



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Help with find recurrence relation running time.Algorithm Running Timerunning time of an algorithmNeed to understand the end of Karatsuba algorithm running time proofCalculating Running Time of Recurrence RelationsStuck: To show that the divide and conquer relation represent Merge SortUnderstanding the running time of an algorithm that is with respect to input size nDifference between asymptotic bound and running timeWhat can be said about the time complexity of given Code snippet?how to work out a computer program running time










0












$begingroup$


for (i=2*n; i>=1; i=i-1)
for (j=1; j<=i; j=j+1)
for (k=1; k<=j; k=k*3)
print(“hello”)


I sopused that its N^5 but Im not sure










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Example:stackoverflow.com/questions/18486543/…
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Mar 27 at 23:12















0












$begingroup$


for (i=2*n; i>=1; i=i-1)
for (j=1; j<=i; j=j+1)
for (k=1; k<=j; k=k*3)
print(“hello”)


I sopused that its N^5 but Im not sure










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Example:stackoverflow.com/questions/18486543/…
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Mar 27 at 23:12













0












0








0





$begingroup$


for (i=2*n; i>=1; i=i-1)
for (j=1; j<=i; j=j+1)
for (k=1; k<=j; k=k*3)
print(“hello”)


I sopused that its N^5 but Im not sure










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




for (i=2*n; i>=1; i=i-1)
for (j=1; j<=i; j=j+1)
for (k=1; k<=j; k=k*3)
print(“hello”)


I sopused that its N^5 but Im not sure







recursive-algorithms






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 28 at 15:25









Julián Aguirre

69.5k24297




69.5k24297










asked Mar 27 at 19:37









Harlinton Palacios MosqueraHarlinton Palacios Mosquera

1




1











  • $begingroup$
    Example:stackoverflow.com/questions/18486543/…
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Mar 27 at 23:12
















  • $begingroup$
    Example:stackoverflow.com/questions/18486543/…
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Mar 27 at 23:12















$begingroup$
Example:stackoverflow.com/questions/18486543/…
$endgroup$
– NoChance
Mar 27 at 23:12




$begingroup$
Example:stackoverflow.com/questions/18486543/…
$endgroup$
– NoChance
Mar 27 at 23:12










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Let's try it. The total number of iterations is given by:



$$I=sum_i=1^2nsum_j=1^isum_k=1^lfloor log_3(j) rfloor 1approxsum_i=1^2nsum_j=1^i log(j) approx
sum_i=1^2nlog(i!)underbraceapprox_textStirling sum_i=1^2nilog(i)underbraceapprox_textSum approx textIntegral n^2log(n) $$



So $O(n^2 log(n))$, but i'm not so keen on this type of exercise :






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'd say more O(n^2 log(n)) because the k=k*3 in the last loop
    $endgroup$
    – Robin Nicole
    Mar 27 at 22:25










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, what a blunder! I thought for strange reason that it took all of the 3 multiples. Thank you :)
    $endgroup$
    – Eureka
    Mar 27 at 22:29











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165017%2fcalculate-the-running-time-of-the-code-snippet-below%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Let's try it. The total number of iterations is given by:



$$I=sum_i=1^2nsum_j=1^isum_k=1^lfloor log_3(j) rfloor 1approxsum_i=1^2nsum_j=1^i log(j) approx
sum_i=1^2nlog(i!)underbraceapprox_textStirling sum_i=1^2nilog(i)underbraceapprox_textSum approx textIntegral n^2log(n) $$



So $O(n^2 log(n))$, but i'm not so keen on this type of exercise :






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'd say more O(n^2 log(n)) because the k=k*3 in the last loop
    $endgroup$
    – Robin Nicole
    Mar 27 at 22:25










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, what a blunder! I thought for strange reason that it took all of the 3 multiples. Thank you :)
    $endgroup$
    – Eureka
    Mar 27 at 22:29















0












$begingroup$

Let's try it. The total number of iterations is given by:



$$I=sum_i=1^2nsum_j=1^isum_k=1^lfloor log_3(j) rfloor 1approxsum_i=1^2nsum_j=1^i log(j) approx
sum_i=1^2nlog(i!)underbraceapprox_textStirling sum_i=1^2nilog(i)underbraceapprox_textSum approx textIntegral n^2log(n) $$



So $O(n^2 log(n))$, but i'm not so keen on this type of exercise :






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I'd say more O(n^2 log(n)) because the k=k*3 in the last loop
    $endgroup$
    – Robin Nicole
    Mar 27 at 22:25










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, what a blunder! I thought for strange reason that it took all of the 3 multiples. Thank you :)
    $endgroup$
    – Eureka
    Mar 27 at 22:29













0












0








0





$begingroup$

Let's try it. The total number of iterations is given by:



$$I=sum_i=1^2nsum_j=1^isum_k=1^lfloor log_3(j) rfloor 1approxsum_i=1^2nsum_j=1^i log(j) approx
sum_i=1^2nlog(i!)underbraceapprox_textStirling sum_i=1^2nilog(i)underbraceapprox_textSum approx textIntegral n^2log(n) $$



So $O(n^2 log(n))$, but i'm not so keen on this type of exercise :






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Let's try it. The total number of iterations is given by:



$$I=sum_i=1^2nsum_j=1^isum_k=1^lfloor log_3(j) rfloor 1approxsum_i=1^2nsum_j=1^i log(j) approx
sum_i=1^2nlog(i!)underbraceapprox_textStirling sum_i=1^2nilog(i)underbraceapprox_textSum approx textIntegral n^2log(n) $$



So $O(n^2 log(n))$, but i'm not so keen on this type of exercise :







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 27 at 22:40

























answered Mar 27 at 21:49









EurekaEureka

907115




907115











  • $begingroup$
    I'd say more O(n^2 log(n)) because the k=k*3 in the last loop
    $endgroup$
    – Robin Nicole
    Mar 27 at 22:25










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, what a blunder! I thought for strange reason that it took all of the 3 multiples. Thank you :)
    $endgroup$
    – Eureka
    Mar 27 at 22:29
















  • $begingroup$
    I'd say more O(n^2 log(n)) because the k=k*3 in the last loop
    $endgroup$
    – Robin Nicole
    Mar 27 at 22:25










  • $begingroup$
    You are right, what a blunder! I thought for strange reason that it took all of the 3 multiples. Thank you :)
    $endgroup$
    – Eureka
    Mar 27 at 22:29















$begingroup$
I'd say more O(n^2 log(n)) because the k=k*3 in the last loop
$endgroup$
– Robin Nicole
Mar 27 at 22:25




$begingroup$
I'd say more O(n^2 log(n)) because the k=k*3 in the last loop
$endgroup$
– Robin Nicole
Mar 27 at 22:25












$begingroup$
You are right, what a blunder! I thought for strange reason that it took all of the 3 multiples. Thank you :)
$endgroup$
– Eureka
Mar 27 at 22:29




$begingroup$
You are right, what a blunder! I thought for strange reason that it took all of the 3 multiples. Thank you :)
$endgroup$
– Eureka
Mar 27 at 22:29

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3165017%2fcalculate-the-running-time-of-the-code-snippet-below%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable