Cardinality of the Set of all finite subset of $mathbbR$ Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Find the cardinality of this set: $x$What is the cardinality of the set of all finite subsets of RWhich of the following sets has the greatest cardinality?(Math subject GRE exam 0568 Q.61 )Is the set of integer coefficient polynomials countable?The cardinality of a countable union of sets with less than continuum cardinalityCardinality of set containing all infinite subsets of $mathbbQ$Cardinality of the set of all two-element subsets of $mathbbN$Find the cardinal of $X=Asubseteq Bbb N : A text is finite $Cardinality of set of functions with coefficients from a set with cardinality omegaPower set of N vs. Union of sets of all cardinalityWhat could be said about the cardinality of $bigcup_iin I A_i$ if $I$ and all the $A_i$ have cardinality $2^aleph_0$How to express the cardinality of $∏_1≤i≤n A_i$ in terms of cardinalities $|A_1|, |A_2|, . . . , |A_n|$Prove that if $A$ is any infinite set, the set of all finite subsets of $A$ has the same cardinality as $A$

Is CEO the "profession" with the most psychopaths?

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

draw dynamic circle around node and edges

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?

What is the meaning of 'breadth' in breadth first search?

What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?

How to make a Field only accept Numbers in Magento 2

How to unroll a parameter pack from right to left

Why does it sometimes sound good to play a grace note as a lead in to a note in a melody?

Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours

What is the difference between globalisation and imperialism?

Belief In God or Knowledge Of God. Which is better?

Why is it faster to reheat something than it is to cook it?

What was the first language to use conditional keywords?

Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?

How could we fake a moon landing now?

Can a new player join a group only when a new campaign starts?

An adverb for when you're not exaggerating

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what does Linux subsystem option mean?

Take 2! Is this homebrew Lady of Pain warlock patron balanced?

AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network

How do I find out the mythology and history of my Fortress?

How many serial ports are on the Pi 3?

Would it be easier to apply for a UK visa if there is a host family to sponsor for you in going there?



Cardinality of the Set of all finite subset of $mathbbR$



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Find the cardinality of this set: $ < aleph_o$What is the cardinality of the set of all finite subsets of RWhich of the following sets has the greatest cardinality?(Math subject GRE exam 0568 Q.61 )Is the set of integer coefficient polynomials countable?The cardinality of a countable union of sets with less than continuum cardinalityCardinality of set containing all infinite subsets of $mathbbQ$Cardinality of the set of all two-element subsets of $mathbbN$Find the cardinal of $X=Asubseteq Bbb N : A text is finite $Cardinality of set of functions with coefficients from a set with cardinality omegaPower set of N vs. Union of sets of all cardinalityWhat could be said about the cardinality of $bigcup_iin I A_i$ if $I$ and all the $A_i$ have cardinality $2^aleph_0$How to express the cardinality of $∏_1≤i≤n A_i$ in terms of cardinalities $|A_1|, |A_2|, . . . , |A_n|$Prove that if $A$ is any infinite set, the set of all finite subsets of $A$ has the same cardinality as $A$










6












$begingroup$


Find the Cardinality of the set of all finite subsets of $mathbbR$.



I have proved that the set of all finite subsets of $mathbbN$ is countable . But I cannot find the cardinality of the set in case of $mathbbR$ .



My Attempt:

First I have considered the set $$A_k= a_i in mathbbR and a_1<...<a_k $$



Then $S=The set of all finite subsets of mathbbR=bigcup_n=1^inftyA_n$

and Now in the case of $mathbbN$ I could show that this $A_k$ is countable and consequently the set of all finite subset of $mathbbN$ is countable.



But in this case I cannot say anything like this...In this case the set will be of the cardinality as that of $mathbbR$ (I think) ..But cannot prove it...



Please Help.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @avs The power set is the set of all subsets, the OP asked for the set of all finite subsets.
    $endgroup$
    – David
    Dec 13 '16 at 23:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you prove that the countable union of sets, each of which has the same cardinality as $Bbb R$, also has the cardinality of $Bbb R$? (This is related to multiplication of cardinals, if you know anything about that at this point.)
    $endgroup$
    – Greg Martin
    Dec 14 '16 at 0:08










  • $begingroup$
    It's easier if you know that $|mathbb R|=|mathcal P(mathbb N)|.$
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Mar 27 at 20:18
















6












$begingroup$


Find the Cardinality of the set of all finite subsets of $mathbbR$.



I have proved that the set of all finite subsets of $mathbbN$ is countable . But I cannot find the cardinality of the set in case of $mathbbR$ .



My Attempt:

First I have considered the set $$A_k= a_i in mathbbR and a_1<...<a_k $$



Then $S=The set of all finite subsets of mathbbR=bigcup_n=1^inftyA_n$

and Now in the case of $mathbbN$ I could show that this $A_k$ is countable and consequently the set of all finite subset of $mathbbN$ is countable.



But in this case I cannot say anything like this...In this case the set will be of the cardinality as that of $mathbbR$ (I think) ..But cannot prove it...



Please Help.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @avs The power set is the set of all subsets, the OP asked for the set of all finite subsets.
    $endgroup$
    – David
    Dec 13 '16 at 23:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you prove that the countable union of sets, each of which has the same cardinality as $Bbb R$, also has the cardinality of $Bbb R$? (This is related to multiplication of cardinals, if you know anything about that at this point.)
    $endgroup$
    – Greg Martin
    Dec 14 '16 at 0:08










  • $begingroup$
    It's easier if you know that $|mathbb R|=|mathcal P(mathbb N)|.$
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Mar 27 at 20:18














6












6








6


2



$begingroup$


Find the Cardinality of the set of all finite subsets of $mathbbR$.



I have proved that the set of all finite subsets of $mathbbN$ is countable . But I cannot find the cardinality of the set in case of $mathbbR$ .



My Attempt:

First I have considered the set $$A_k= a_i in mathbbR and a_1<...<a_k $$



Then $S=The set of all finite subsets of mathbbR=bigcup_n=1^inftyA_n$

and Now in the case of $mathbbN$ I could show that this $A_k$ is countable and consequently the set of all finite subset of $mathbbN$ is countable.



But in this case I cannot say anything like this...In this case the set will be of the cardinality as that of $mathbbR$ (I think) ..But cannot prove it...



Please Help.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Find the Cardinality of the set of all finite subsets of $mathbbR$.



I have proved that the set of all finite subsets of $mathbbN$ is countable . But I cannot find the cardinality of the set in case of $mathbbR$ .



My Attempt:

First I have considered the set $$A_k= a_i in mathbbR and a_1<...<a_k $$



Then $S=The set of all finite subsets of mathbbR=bigcup_n=1^inftyA_n$

and Now in the case of $mathbbN$ I could show that this $A_k$ is countable and consequently the set of all finite subset of $mathbbN$ is countable.



But in this case I cannot say anything like this...In this case the set will be of the cardinality as that of $mathbbR$ (I think) ..But cannot prove it...



Please Help.







cardinals






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 13 '16 at 23:29









Indrajit GhoshIndrajit Ghosh

1,0871718




1,0871718







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @avs The power set is the set of all subsets, the OP asked for the set of all finite subsets.
    $endgroup$
    – David
    Dec 13 '16 at 23:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you prove that the countable union of sets, each of which has the same cardinality as $Bbb R$, also has the cardinality of $Bbb R$? (This is related to multiplication of cardinals, if you know anything about that at this point.)
    $endgroup$
    – Greg Martin
    Dec 14 '16 at 0:08










  • $begingroup$
    It's easier if you know that $|mathbb R|=|mathcal P(mathbb N)|.$
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Mar 27 at 20:18













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @avs The power set is the set of all subsets, the OP asked for the set of all finite subsets.
    $endgroup$
    – David
    Dec 13 '16 at 23:49






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you prove that the countable union of sets, each of which has the same cardinality as $Bbb R$, also has the cardinality of $Bbb R$? (This is related to multiplication of cardinals, if you know anything about that at this point.)
    $endgroup$
    – Greg Martin
    Dec 14 '16 at 0:08










  • $begingroup$
    It's easier if you know that $|mathbb R|=|mathcal P(mathbb N)|.$
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Andrews
    Mar 27 at 20:18








3




3




$begingroup$
@avs The power set is the set of all subsets, the OP asked for the set of all finite subsets.
$endgroup$
– David
Dec 13 '16 at 23:49




$begingroup$
@avs The power set is the set of all subsets, the OP asked for the set of all finite subsets.
$endgroup$
– David
Dec 13 '16 at 23:49




1




1




$begingroup$
Can you prove that the countable union of sets, each of which has the same cardinality as $Bbb R$, also has the cardinality of $Bbb R$? (This is related to multiplication of cardinals, if you know anything about that at this point.)
$endgroup$
– Greg Martin
Dec 14 '16 at 0:08




$begingroup$
Can you prove that the countable union of sets, each of which has the same cardinality as $Bbb R$, also has the cardinality of $Bbb R$? (This is related to multiplication of cardinals, if you know anything about that at this point.)
$endgroup$
– Greg Martin
Dec 14 '16 at 0:08












$begingroup$
It's easier if you know that $|mathbb R|=|mathcal P(mathbb N)|.$
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Mar 27 at 20:18





$begingroup$
It's easier if you know that $|mathbb R|=|mathcal P(mathbb N)|.$
$endgroup$
– Thomas Andrews
Mar 27 at 20:18











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

We can show that $#S ge c$ via the injection $f: mathbbR rightarrow S$, $f(x) = x$.



If you show $#S le c$ then you can conclude $#S = c$ invoking Bernstein's theorem.




Let's prove the following: let $X = X_k, k in mathbbN$ be a family of subsets such that $#X_i le c$, $ forall i in mathbbN$, and let $V = bigcup_kin mathbbNX_k$. Then $#V le c$.



Because $#X_i le c$, we have for each $i$ a surjective $f_i: mathbbR rightarrow X_i$. We define $g: mathbbN times mathbbR rightarrow V$, $g(n,x) = f_n(x)$.



$g$ is an surjective function: let $x in V$, then $x in X_i$ for some $i$, then we have $a in mathbbR$ such that $f_i(a) = x$ because $f_i$ is surjective. Then $g(i,a) = f_i(a) = x$, with $(i,a) in mathbbNtimesmathbbR$.



We conclude that $g$ is surjective.



Thus $#V le #(mathbbNtimesmathbbR)$, this is, $#V le c$.




Your set $S$ satisfies the hypotheses, so we have $#S le c$, and thus $#S = c$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2057826%2fcardinality-of-the-set-of-all-finite-subset-of-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    We can show that $#S ge c$ via the injection $f: mathbbR rightarrow S$, $f(x) = x$.



    If you show $#S le c$ then you can conclude $#S = c$ invoking Bernstein's theorem.




    Let's prove the following: let $X = X_k, k in mathbbN$ be a family of subsets such that $#X_i le c$, $ forall i in mathbbN$, and let $V = bigcup_kin mathbbNX_k$. Then $#V le c$.



    Because $#X_i le c$, we have for each $i$ a surjective $f_i: mathbbR rightarrow X_i$. We define $g: mathbbN times mathbbR rightarrow V$, $g(n,x) = f_n(x)$.



    $g$ is an surjective function: let $x in V$, then $x in X_i$ for some $i$, then we have $a in mathbbR$ such that $f_i(a) = x$ because $f_i$ is surjective. Then $g(i,a) = f_i(a) = x$, with $(i,a) in mathbbNtimesmathbbR$.



    We conclude that $g$ is surjective.



    Thus $#V le #(mathbbNtimesmathbbR)$, this is, $#V le c$.




    Your set $S$ satisfies the hypotheses, so we have $#S le c$, and thus $#S = c$.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      We can show that $#S ge c$ via the injection $f: mathbbR rightarrow S$, $f(x) = x$.



      If you show $#S le c$ then you can conclude $#S = c$ invoking Bernstein's theorem.




      Let's prove the following: let $X = X_k, k in mathbbN$ be a family of subsets such that $#X_i le c$, $ forall i in mathbbN$, and let $V = bigcup_kin mathbbNX_k$. Then $#V le c$.



      Because $#X_i le c$, we have for each $i$ a surjective $f_i: mathbbR rightarrow X_i$. We define $g: mathbbN times mathbbR rightarrow V$, $g(n,x) = f_n(x)$.



      $g$ is an surjective function: let $x in V$, then $x in X_i$ for some $i$, then we have $a in mathbbR$ such that $f_i(a) = x$ because $f_i$ is surjective. Then $g(i,a) = f_i(a) = x$, with $(i,a) in mathbbNtimesmathbbR$.



      We conclude that $g$ is surjective.



      Thus $#V le #(mathbbNtimesmathbbR)$, this is, $#V le c$.




      Your set $S$ satisfies the hypotheses, so we have $#S le c$, and thus $#S = c$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        We can show that $#S ge c$ via the injection $f: mathbbR rightarrow S$, $f(x) = x$.



        If you show $#S le c$ then you can conclude $#S = c$ invoking Bernstein's theorem.




        Let's prove the following: let $X = X_k, k in mathbbN$ be a family of subsets such that $#X_i le c$, $ forall i in mathbbN$, and let $V = bigcup_kin mathbbNX_k$. Then $#V le c$.



        Because $#X_i le c$, we have for each $i$ a surjective $f_i: mathbbR rightarrow X_i$. We define $g: mathbbN times mathbbR rightarrow V$, $g(n,x) = f_n(x)$.



        $g$ is an surjective function: let $x in V$, then $x in X_i$ for some $i$, then we have $a in mathbbR$ such that $f_i(a) = x$ because $f_i$ is surjective. Then $g(i,a) = f_i(a) = x$, with $(i,a) in mathbbNtimesmathbbR$.



        We conclude that $g$ is surjective.



        Thus $#V le #(mathbbNtimesmathbbR)$, this is, $#V le c$.




        Your set $S$ satisfies the hypotheses, so we have $#S le c$, and thus $#S = c$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        We can show that $#S ge c$ via the injection $f: mathbbR rightarrow S$, $f(x) = x$.



        If you show $#S le c$ then you can conclude $#S = c$ invoking Bernstein's theorem.




        Let's prove the following: let $X = X_k, k in mathbbN$ be a family of subsets such that $#X_i le c$, $ forall i in mathbbN$, and let $V = bigcup_kin mathbbNX_k$. Then $#V le c$.



        Because $#X_i le c$, we have for each $i$ a surjective $f_i: mathbbR rightarrow X_i$. We define $g: mathbbN times mathbbR rightarrow V$, $g(n,x) = f_n(x)$.



        $g$ is an surjective function: let $x in V$, then $x in X_i$ for some $i$, then we have $a in mathbbR$ such that $f_i(a) = x$ because $f_i$ is surjective. Then $g(i,a) = f_i(a) = x$, with $(i,a) in mathbbNtimesmathbbR$.



        We conclude that $g$ is surjective.



        Thus $#V le #(mathbbNtimesmathbbR)$, this is, $#V le c$.




        Your set $S$ satisfies the hypotheses, so we have $#S le c$, and thus $#S = c$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 14 '16 at 1:13

























        answered Dec 14 '16 at 0:57









        cheliverychelivery

        1785




        1785



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2057826%2fcardinality-of-the-set-of-all-finite-subset-of-mathbbr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

            How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

            random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable