Geometric interpretation of a linear system Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Geometric Interpretation of Solutions to Linear SystemsSolution to this linear equation systemGeometric description of linear equationUnderstanding geometry of linear systemSystem of linear equations - ResolutionSolving Homogeneous System using Gauss–Jordan eliminationShow that the system of equations $Ax=b$ is not consistent for all $b$ in $mathbbR^3$Solving a simple system.Understanding solution of system of linear equationsProve the geometric interpretation?

What is the appropriate index architecture when forced to implement IsDeleted (soft deletes)?

Crossing US/Canada Border for less than 24 hours

Who can remove European Commissioners?

Aligning an equation at multiple points, with both left and right alignment, as well as equals sign alignment

What do you call the main part of a joke?

How to compare two different files line by line in unix?

How often does castling occur in grandmaster games?

How to dry out epoxy resin faster than usual?

What initially awakened the Balrog?

What to do with repeated rejections for phd position

Interpretation of R output from Cohen's Kappa

Strange behavior of Object.defineProperty() in JavaScript

Most bit efficient text communication method?

Can anything be seen from the center of the Boötes void? How dark would it be?

Why weren't discrete x86 CPUs ever used in game hardware?

How does light 'choose' between wave and particle behaviour?

Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube

An adverb for when you're not exaggerating

Belief In God or Knowledge Of God. Which is better?

Put R under double integral

Quadrilaterals with equal sides

Why is it faster to reheat something than it is to cook it?

How do living politicians protect their readily obtainable signatures from misuse?

Did Mueller's report provide an evidentiary basis for the claim of Russian govt election interference via social media?



Geometric interpretation of a linear system



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Geometric Interpretation of Solutions to Linear SystemsSolution to this linear equation systemGeometric description of linear equationUnderstanding geometry of linear systemSystem of linear equations - ResolutionSolving Homogeneous System using Gauss–Jordan eliminationShow that the system of equations $Ax=b$ is not consistent for all $b$ in $mathbbR^3$Solving a simple system.Understanding solution of system of linear equationsProve the geometric interpretation?










0












$begingroup$


Solve the following system of linear equations in terms of parameter $ainmathbb R$ and explain geometric interpretation of this system:
$ax+y+z=1,2x+2ay+2z=3, x+y+az=1$.



By Cronecker Capelli's theorem, we get:
$$ beginbmatrix
a & 1 & 1 & 1\
2 & 2a & 2 & 3\
1 & 1 & a & 1\
endbmatrix$$



Row echelon form of this matrix is $$beginbmatrix
1 & 1 & a & 1\
0 & 2(a-1) & 2(1-a) & 1\
0 & 0 & (1-a)(a+2) & (3-2a)/2\
endbmatrix$$



System is inconsistent for $a=1 lor a=-2 $. For every other value of $a$, system has unique solution.



For every $a$ instead of $a=1 land a=-2$ there are three planes that intersect at a point.



Question: Is this geometric interpretation correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You should also study what relation exists between the planes when $a=1$ and when $a=-2$. Are they parallel? Are two of them parallel and does one of them intersect with these two?...
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Masse
    Jul 16 '16 at 17:28















0












$begingroup$


Solve the following system of linear equations in terms of parameter $ainmathbb R$ and explain geometric interpretation of this system:
$ax+y+z=1,2x+2ay+2z=3, x+y+az=1$.



By Cronecker Capelli's theorem, we get:
$$ beginbmatrix
a & 1 & 1 & 1\
2 & 2a & 2 & 3\
1 & 1 & a & 1\
endbmatrix$$



Row echelon form of this matrix is $$beginbmatrix
1 & 1 & a & 1\
0 & 2(a-1) & 2(1-a) & 1\
0 & 0 & (1-a)(a+2) & (3-2a)/2\
endbmatrix$$



System is inconsistent for $a=1 lor a=-2 $. For every other value of $a$, system has unique solution.



For every $a$ instead of $a=1 land a=-2$ there are three planes that intersect at a point.



Question: Is this geometric interpretation correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    You should also study what relation exists between the planes when $a=1$ and when $a=-2$. Are they parallel? Are two of them parallel and does one of them intersect with these two?...
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Masse
    Jul 16 '16 at 17:28













0












0








0





$begingroup$


Solve the following system of linear equations in terms of parameter $ainmathbb R$ and explain geometric interpretation of this system:
$ax+y+z=1,2x+2ay+2z=3, x+y+az=1$.



By Cronecker Capelli's theorem, we get:
$$ beginbmatrix
a & 1 & 1 & 1\
2 & 2a & 2 & 3\
1 & 1 & a & 1\
endbmatrix$$



Row echelon form of this matrix is $$beginbmatrix
1 & 1 & a & 1\
0 & 2(a-1) & 2(1-a) & 1\
0 & 0 & (1-a)(a+2) & (3-2a)/2\
endbmatrix$$



System is inconsistent for $a=1 lor a=-2 $. For every other value of $a$, system has unique solution.



For every $a$ instead of $a=1 land a=-2$ there are three planes that intersect at a point.



Question: Is this geometric interpretation correct?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Solve the following system of linear equations in terms of parameter $ainmathbb R$ and explain geometric interpretation of this system:
$ax+y+z=1,2x+2ay+2z=3, x+y+az=1$.



By Cronecker Capelli's theorem, we get:
$$ beginbmatrix
a & 1 & 1 & 1\
2 & 2a & 2 & 3\
1 & 1 & a & 1\
endbmatrix$$



Row echelon form of this matrix is $$beginbmatrix
1 & 1 & a & 1\
0 & 2(a-1) & 2(1-a) & 1\
0 & 0 & (1-a)(a+2) & (3-2a)/2\
endbmatrix$$



System is inconsistent for $a=1 lor a=-2 $. For every other value of $a$, system has unique solution.



For every $a$ instead of $a=1 land a=-2$ there are three planes that intersect at a point.



Question: Is this geometric interpretation correct?







linear-algebra matrices systems-of-equations plane-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jul 16 '16 at 17:20









user300046user300046

386




386











  • $begingroup$
    You should also study what relation exists between the planes when $a=1$ and when $a=-2$. Are they parallel? Are two of them parallel and does one of them intersect with these two?...
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Masse
    Jul 16 '16 at 17:28
















  • $begingroup$
    You should also study what relation exists between the planes when $a=1$ and when $a=-2$. Are they parallel? Are two of them parallel and does one of them intersect with these two?...
    $endgroup$
    – Bernard Masse
    Jul 16 '16 at 17:28















$begingroup$
You should also study what relation exists between the planes when $a=1$ and when $a=-2$. Are they parallel? Are two of them parallel and does one of them intersect with these two?...
$endgroup$
– Bernard Masse
Jul 16 '16 at 17:28




$begingroup$
You should also study what relation exists between the planes when $a=1$ and when $a=-2$. Are they parallel? Are two of them parallel and does one of them intersect with these two?...
$endgroup$
– Bernard Masse
Jul 16 '16 at 17:28










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

When $aneq1$ and $aneq-2$ the solution is $$x=z=frac2a-32(a-1)(a+2),qquad y=frac3a-12(a-1)(a+2)$$



When $a=1$ the first and third equations are the same and inconsistent with the second one, i.e. the plane described by the first and third equations is parallel to the plane defined by the second equation. The augmented matrix has rank 2 while the coefficient matrix has rank 1.



When $a=-2$ the augmented matrix has rank $3$ and the coefficient matrix has rank 2, so again the three equations are inconsistent. You might find this page useful to work out the geometric interpretation: http://www.vitutor.com/geometry/space/three_planes.html






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    To summarize, in case where $aneq 1 land aneq -2$ we have two coincident planes and one that intersects them in a line. In case where $a=1 land a=-2$ we have two coincident planes and the other is parallel to them. Is this correct?
    $endgroup$
    – user300046
    Jul 16 '16 at 18:41










  • $begingroup$
    No, when $aneq 1$ and $aneq 2$, both the augmented matrix and coefficient matrix have rank 3 and so the planes intersect at a point (the one given in my answer). When $a=1$ the two of the planes coincide and are parallel the the third plane. When $a=-2$ each plane cuts the other two in a line. Look at the link in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – smcc
    Jul 16 '16 at 21:23












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1861440%2fgeometric-interpretation-of-a-linear-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

When $aneq1$ and $aneq-2$ the solution is $$x=z=frac2a-32(a-1)(a+2),qquad y=frac3a-12(a-1)(a+2)$$



When $a=1$ the first and third equations are the same and inconsistent with the second one, i.e. the plane described by the first and third equations is parallel to the plane defined by the second equation. The augmented matrix has rank 2 while the coefficient matrix has rank 1.



When $a=-2$ the augmented matrix has rank $3$ and the coefficient matrix has rank 2, so again the three equations are inconsistent. You might find this page useful to work out the geometric interpretation: http://www.vitutor.com/geometry/space/three_planes.html






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    To summarize, in case where $aneq 1 land aneq -2$ we have two coincident planes and one that intersects them in a line. In case where $a=1 land a=-2$ we have two coincident planes and the other is parallel to them. Is this correct?
    $endgroup$
    – user300046
    Jul 16 '16 at 18:41










  • $begingroup$
    No, when $aneq 1$ and $aneq 2$, both the augmented matrix and coefficient matrix have rank 3 and so the planes intersect at a point (the one given in my answer). When $a=1$ the two of the planes coincide and are parallel the the third plane. When $a=-2$ each plane cuts the other two in a line. Look at the link in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – smcc
    Jul 16 '16 at 21:23
















0












$begingroup$

When $aneq1$ and $aneq-2$ the solution is $$x=z=frac2a-32(a-1)(a+2),qquad y=frac3a-12(a-1)(a+2)$$



When $a=1$ the first and third equations are the same and inconsistent with the second one, i.e. the plane described by the first and third equations is parallel to the plane defined by the second equation. The augmented matrix has rank 2 while the coefficient matrix has rank 1.



When $a=-2$ the augmented matrix has rank $3$ and the coefficient matrix has rank 2, so again the three equations are inconsistent. You might find this page useful to work out the geometric interpretation: http://www.vitutor.com/geometry/space/three_planes.html






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    To summarize, in case where $aneq 1 land aneq -2$ we have two coincident planes and one that intersects them in a line. In case where $a=1 land a=-2$ we have two coincident planes and the other is parallel to them. Is this correct?
    $endgroup$
    – user300046
    Jul 16 '16 at 18:41










  • $begingroup$
    No, when $aneq 1$ and $aneq 2$, both the augmented matrix and coefficient matrix have rank 3 and so the planes intersect at a point (the one given in my answer). When $a=1$ the two of the planes coincide and are parallel the the third plane. When $a=-2$ each plane cuts the other two in a line. Look at the link in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – smcc
    Jul 16 '16 at 21:23














0












0








0





$begingroup$

When $aneq1$ and $aneq-2$ the solution is $$x=z=frac2a-32(a-1)(a+2),qquad y=frac3a-12(a-1)(a+2)$$



When $a=1$ the first and third equations are the same and inconsistent with the second one, i.e. the plane described by the first and third equations is parallel to the plane defined by the second equation. The augmented matrix has rank 2 while the coefficient matrix has rank 1.



When $a=-2$ the augmented matrix has rank $3$ and the coefficient matrix has rank 2, so again the three equations are inconsistent. You might find this page useful to work out the geometric interpretation: http://www.vitutor.com/geometry/space/three_planes.html






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



When $aneq1$ and $aneq-2$ the solution is $$x=z=frac2a-32(a-1)(a+2),qquad y=frac3a-12(a-1)(a+2)$$



When $a=1$ the first and third equations are the same and inconsistent with the second one, i.e. the plane described by the first and third equations is parallel to the plane defined by the second equation. The augmented matrix has rank 2 while the coefficient matrix has rank 1.



When $a=-2$ the augmented matrix has rank $3$ and the coefficient matrix has rank 2, so again the three equations are inconsistent. You might find this page useful to work out the geometric interpretation: http://www.vitutor.com/geometry/space/three_planes.html







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jul 16 '16 at 17:44

























answered Jul 16 '16 at 17:28









smccsmcc

4,317517




4,317517











  • $begingroup$
    To summarize, in case where $aneq 1 land aneq -2$ we have two coincident planes and one that intersects them in a line. In case where $a=1 land a=-2$ we have two coincident planes and the other is parallel to them. Is this correct?
    $endgroup$
    – user300046
    Jul 16 '16 at 18:41










  • $begingroup$
    No, when $aneq 1$ and $aneq 2$, both the augmented matrix and coefficient matrix have rank 3 and so the planes intersect at a point (the one given in my answer). When $a=1$ the two of the planes coincide and are parallel the the third plane. When $a=-2$ each plane cuts the other two in a line. Look at the link in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – smcc
    Jul 16 '16 at 21:23

















  • $begingroup$
    To summarize, in case where $aneq 1 land aneq -2$ we have two coincident planes and one that intersects them in a line. In case where $a=1 land a=-2$ we have two coincident planes and the other is parallel to them. Is this correct?
    $endgroup$
    – user300046
    Jul 16 '16 at 18:41










  • $begingroup$
    No, when $aneq 1$ and $aneq 2$, both the augmented matrix and coefficient matrix have rank 3 and so the planes intersect at a point (the one given in my answer). When $a=1$ the two of the planes coincide and are parallel the the third plane. When $a=-2$ each plane cuts the other two in a line. Look at the link in my answer.
    $endgroup$
    – smcc
    Jul 16 '16 at 21:23
















$begingroup$
To summarize, in case where $aneq 1 land aneq -2$ we have two coincident planes and one that intersects them in a line. In case where $a=1 land a=-2$ we have two coincident planes and the other is parallel to them. Is this correct?
$endgroup$
– user300046
Jul 16 '16 at 18:41




$begingroup$
To summarize, in case where $aneq 1 land aneq -2$ we have two coincident planes and one that intersects them in a line. In case where $a=1 land a=-2$ we have two coincident planes and the other is parallel to them. Is this correct?
$endgroup$
– user300046
Jul 16 '16 at 18:41












$begingroup$
No, when $aneq 1$ and $aneq 2$, both the augmented matrix and coefficient matrix have rank 3 and so the planes intersect at a point (the one given in my answer). When $a=1$ the two of the planes coincide and are parallel the the third plane. When $a=-2$ each plane cuts the other two in a line. Look at the link in my answer.
$endgroup$
– smcc
Jul 16 '16 at 21:23





$begingroup$
No, when $aneq 1$ and $aneq 2$, both the augmented matrix and coefficient matrix have rank 3 and so the planes intersect at a point (the one given in my answer). When $a=1$ the two of the planes coincide and are parallel the the third plane. When $a=-2$ each plane cuts the other two in a line. Look at the link in my answer.
$endgroup$
– smcc
Jul 16 '16 at 21:23


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1861440%2fgeometric-interpretation-of-a-linear-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable