Is there anything in the literature about $2k$-nary infix grammars, in particular easy validity and parsing schemes?$L=G_1,2$ are context free grammars, and the size of $L(G_1) cup L(G_2) $is a prime$ in R$?
Different meanings of こわい
Is this draw by repetition?
Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?
Why is the sentence "Das ist eine Nase" correct?
meaning of 腰を落としている
OP Amp not amplifying audio signal
Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?
What is the opposite of "eschatology"?
What do you call someone who asks many questions?
How exploitable/balanced is this homebrew spell: Spell Permanency?
Is there an online compendium of Rav Moshe teshuvos in English that exists?
What is the most common color to indicate the input-field is disabled?
Is there an expression that means doing something right before you will need it rather than doing it in case you might need it?
Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?
Where would I need my direct neural interface to be implanted?
What are the G forces leaving Earth orbit?
ssTTsSTtRrriinInnnnNNNIiinngg
How can a day be of 24 hours?
Could the museum Saturn V's be refitted for one more flight?
Is it "common practice in Fourier transform spectroscopy to multiply the measured interferogram by an apodizing function"? If so, why?
Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?
How to prevent "they're falling in love" trope
What's the meaning of "Sollensaussagen"?
What Exploit Are These User Agents Trying to Use?
Is there anything in the literature about $2k$-nary infix grammars, in particular easy validity and parsing schemes?
$L=langle G_1,G_2 rangle in R$?
$begingroup$
Suppose $k$ is a positive integer: I'm working with the $2k$-nary infix grammar
$$
S to mathrmopd | SSldots S mathrmopr SSldots S,
$$
where there are $k$ $S$s in each side of the $mathrmopr$.
This is a CFG, so the rich theory of CFG's and PDA's applies, and it's also obvious that the grammar is ambiguous as is (without parentheses or precedence rules). But far more simplistically --
I have found a very easy algorithm involving just counting how many $mathrmopd$s are in between pairs of $mathrmopr$s to validate expressions in the language and which provides a parse for valid expressions.
Is this result new and/or interesting?
context-free-grammar
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $k$ is a positive integer: I'm working with the $2k$-nary infix grammar
$$
S to mathrmopd | SSldots S mathrmopr SSldots S,
$$
where there are $k$ $S$s in each side of the $mathrmopr$.
This is a CFG, so the rich theory of CFG's and PDA's applies, and it's also obvious that the grammar is ambiguous as is (without parentheses or precedence rules). But far more simplistically --
I have found a very easy algorithm involving just counting how many $mathrmopd$s are in between pairs of $mathrmopr$s to validate expressions in the language and which provides a parse for valid expressions.
Is this result new and/or interesting?
context-free-grammar
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $k$ is a positive integer: I'm working with the $2k$-nary infix grammar
$$
S to mathrmopd | SSldots S mathrmopr SSldots S,
$$
where there are $k$ $S$s in each side of the $mathrmopr$.
This is a CFG, so the rich theory of CFG's and PDA's applies, and it's also obvious that the grammar is ambiguous as is (without parentheses or precedence rules). But far more simplistically --
I have found a very easy algorithm involving just counting how many $mathrmopd$s are in between pairs of $mathrmopr$s to validate expressions in the language and which provides a parse for valid expressions.
Is this result new and/or interesting?
context-free-grammar
$endgroup$
Suppose $k$ is a positive integer: I'm working with the $2k$-nary infix grammar
$$
S to mathrmopd | SSldots S mathrmopr SSldots S,
$$
where there are $k$ $S$s in each side of the $mathrmopr$.
This is a CFG, so the rich theory of CFG's and PDA's applies, and it's also obvious that the grammar is ambiguous as is (without parentheses or precedence rules). But far more simplistically --
I have found a very easy algorithm involving just counting how many $mathrmopd$s are in between pairs of $mathrmopr$s to validate expressions in the language and which provides a parse for valid expressions.
Is this result new and/or interesting?
context-free-grammar
context-free-grammar
edited Mar 20 at 20:02
Daniele Tampieri
2,65221022
2,65221022
asked Mar 20 at 18:20
Steven MinskerSteven Minsker
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155825%2fis-there-anything-in-the-literature-about-2k-nary-infix-grammars-in-particula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155825%2fis-there-anything-in-the-literature-about-2k-nary-infix-grammars-in-particula%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown