Dimensions of paper needed to roll a cone (Updated with clarifications)Calulating length of cable running along exterior of an axleArea of equilateral triangle around circles placed in equilateral triangleProjecting a surface segment of a cone onto a 2D plane?Roll Weight calculationWas this a correct approach? Is there a simpler one?Dihedral Calculation.What 'uniform' shapes can be used to build an approximated spherical object?Find diameter of partially filled coneHow to label the intersection of edges in arbitrary four-sided shapes?Is the right intersection of an oblique circular cone an ellipse?

How does a refinance allow a mortgage to be repaid?

Fair gambler's ruin problem intuition

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?

Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?

What is required to make GPS signals available indoors?

Why do I get negative height?

Placement of More Information/Help Icon button for Radio Buttons

What is the opposite of "eschatology"?

Why are UK visa biometrics appointments suspended at USCIS Application Support Centers?

Does Dispel Magic work on Tiny Hut?

Are British MPs missing the point, with these 'Indicative Votes'?

Ambiguity in the definition of entropy

Why is the sentence "Das ist eine Nase" correct?

How to install cross-compiler on Ubuntu 18.04?

How to travel to Japan while expressing milk?

How to show a landlord what we have in savings?

Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?

What is the most common color to indicate the input-field is disabled?

How to compactly explain secondary and tertiary characters without resorting to stereotypes?

Can I hook these wires up to find the connection to a dead outlet?

Finding the error in an argument

Finitely generated matrix groups whose eigenvalues are all algebraic

What is a Samsaran Word™?



Dimensions of paper needed to roll a cone (Updated with clarifications)


Calulating length of cable running along exterior of an axleArea of equilateral triangle around circles placed in equilateral triangleProjecting a surface segment of a cone onto a 2D plane?Roll Weight calculationWas this a correct approach? Is there a simpler one?Dihedral Calculation.What 'uniform' shapes can be used to build an approximated spherical object?Find diameter of partially filled coneHow to label the intersection of edges in arbitrary four-sided shapes?Is the right intersection of an oblique circular cone an ellipse?













2












$begingroup$


I'm looking for a way to calculate the dimensions of a piece of paper needed to roll up into a cone shape. Please consider the following diagram I created (nothing is drawn to scale):



enter image description here



In this example, I'm trying to create a cone shape, that is 100 mm tall and has a top diameter of 3 mm, and a bottom diameter of 12 mm (FIG 1). FIG 2 shows a piece of paper that is 0.1 mm thick shaped like what I would expect the final piece to look like. However, sides A and C would be much longer than illustrated.



Essentially, what I need is a way to figure out the lengths of sides A, B, and C in FIG 2, such that when the paper is rolled tightly, I could achieve the cone in FIG 1.



NOTE: I'm not trying to just create a "shell" of the cone as shown in FIG 3. I would like to roll the paper shape tightly into the cone to provide a solid structure (as shown in FIG 4).




EDIT: I'm adding some clarification. I did a "real world" example to try to illustrate what I'm trying to accomplish.



  1. I cut out a shape similar to the one is FIG 2 above.
    image 1


  2. I roll it as shown here.
    image 2


  3. This is what the cone looks like when done rolling.
    image 3


  4. The top of the cone shows a diameter of 2.1 mm
    image 4


  5. And the bottom of the cone shows a diameter of 3.4 mm
    image 5


I hope this makes things more clear.



EDIT 2: Maybe the numbers in the initial example are just not realistic. So how about something like 2 mm for the top diameter and 5 mm for the bottom one.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    In what direction will you be rolling. Also: what have you tried?
    $endgroup$
    – clathratus
    Mar 20 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    There are several problems with your description. First of all, to get a conic surface you must fold a circular sector, and not a trapezoid as in your picture. Moreover, you cannot get a uniformly tight structure: to get 12 mm at the base you should roll 120 layers of paper, but for 3 mm on top you need only 30 layers.
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 20 at 21:26










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the responses. @ Aretino: I added a "real-world" example to show what I'm trying to accomplish.
    $endgroup$
    – Alarik
    Mar 20 at 21:52















2












$begingroup$


I'm looking for a way to calculate the dimensions of a piece of paper needed to roll up into a cone shape. Please consider the following diagram I created (nothing is drawn to scale):



enter image description here



In this example, I'm trying to create a cone shape, that is 100 mm tall and has a top diameter of 3 mm, and a bottom diameter of 12 mm (FIG 1). FIG 2 shows a piece of paper that is 0.1 mm thick shaped like what I would expect the final piece to look like. However, sides A and C would be much longer than illustrated.



Essentially, what I need is a way to figure out the lengths of sides A, B, and C in FIG 2, such that when the paper is rolled tightly, I could achieve the cone in FIG 1.



NOTE: I'm not trying to just create a "shell" of the cone as shown in FIG 3. I would like to roll the paper shape tightly into the cone to provide a solid structure (as shown in FIG 4).




EDIT: I'm adding some clarification. I did a "real world" example to try to illustrate what I'm trying to accomplish.



  1. I cut out a shape similar to the one is FIG 2 above.
    image 1


  2. I roll it as shown here.
    image 2


  3. This is what the cone looks like when done rolling.
    image 3


  4. The top of the cone shows a diameter of 2.1 mm
    image 4


  5. And the bottom of the cone shows a diameter of 3.4 mm
    image 5


I hope this makes things more clear.



EDIT 2: Maybe the numbers in the initial example are just not realistic. So how about something like 2 mm for the top diameter and 5 mm for the bottom one.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    In what direction will you be rolling. Also: what have you tried?
    $endgroup$
    – clathratus
    Mar 20 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    There are several problems with your description. First of all, to get a conic surface you must fold a circular sector, and not a trapezoid as in your picture. Moreover, you cannot get a uniformly tight structure: to get 12 mm at the base you should roll 120 layers of paper, but for 3 mm on top you need only 30 layers.
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 20 at 21:26










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the responses. @ Aretino: I added a "real-world" example to show what I'm trying to accomplish.
    $endgroup$
    – Alarik
    Mar 20 at 21:52













2












2








2


0



$begingroup$


I'm looking for a way to calculate the dimensions of a piece of paper needed to roll up into a cone shape. Please consider the following diagram I created (nothing is drawn to scale):



enter image description here



In this example, I'm trying to create a cone shape, that is 100 mm tall and has a top diameter of 3 mm, and a bottom diameter of 12 mm (FIG 1). FIG 2 shows a piece of paper that is 0.1 mm thick shaped like what I would expect the final piece to look like. However, sides A and C would be much longer than illustrated.



Essentially, what I need is a way to figure out the lengths of sides A, B, and C in FIG 2, such that when the paper is rolled tightly, I could achieve the cone in FIG 1.



NOTE: I'm not trying to just create a "shell" of the cone as shown in FIG 3. I would like to roll the paper shape tightly into the cone to provide a solid structure (as shown in FIG 4).




EDIT: I'm adding some clarification. I did a "real world" example to try to illustrate what I'm trying to accomplish.



  1. I cut out a shape similar to the one is FIG 2 above.
    image 1


  2. I roll it as shown here.
    image 2


  3. This is what the cone looks like when done rolling.
    image 3


  4. The top of the cone shows a diameter of 2.1 mm
    image 4


  5. And the bottom of the cone shows a diameter of 3.4 mm
    image 5


I hope this makes things more clear.



EDIT 2: Maybe the numbers in the initial example are just not realistic. So how about something like 2 mm for the top diameter and 5 mm for the bottom one.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm looking for a way to calculate the dimensions of a piece of paper needed to roll up into a cone shape. Please consider the following diagram I created (nothing is drawn to scale):



enter image description here



In this example, I'm trying to create a cone shape, that is 100 mm tall and has a top diameter of 3 mm, and a bottom diameter of 12 mm (FIG 1). FIG 2 shows a piece of paper that is 0.1 mm thick shaped like what I would expect the final piece to look like. However, sides A and C would be much longer than illustrated.



Essentially, what I need is a way to figure out the lengths of sides A, B, and C in FIG 2, such that when the paper is rolled tightly, I could achieve the cone in FIG 1.



NOTE: I'm not trying to just create a "shell" of the cone as shown in FIG 3. I would like to roll the paper shape tightly into the cone to provide a solid structure (as shown in FIG 4).




EDIT: I'm adding some clarification. I did a "real world" example to try to illustrate what I'm trying to accomplish.



  1. I cut out a shape similar to the one is FIG 2 above.
    image 1


  2. I roll it as shown here.
    image 2


  3. This is what the cone looks like when done rolling.
    image 3


  4. The top of the cone shows a diameter of 2.1 mm
    image 4


  5. And the bottom of the cone shows a diameter of 3.4 mm
    image 5


I hope this makes things more clear.



EDIT 2: Maybe the numbers in the initial example are just not realistic. So how about something like 2 mm for the top diameter and 5 mm for the bottom one.







geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 20 at 22:48







Alarik

















asked Mar 20 at 19:33









AlarikAlarik

133




133











  • $begingroup$
    In what direction will you be rolling. Also: what have you tried?
    $endgroup$
    – clathratus
    Mar 20 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    There are several problems with your description. First of all, to get a conic surface you must fold a circular sector, and not a trapezoid as in your picture. Moreover, you cannot get a uniformly tight structure: to get 12 mm at the base you should roll 120 layers of paper, but for 3 mm on top you need only 30 layers.
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 20 at 21:26










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the responses. @ Aretino: I added a "real-world" example to show what I'm trying to accomplish.
    $endgroup$
    – Alarik
    Mar 20 at 21:52
















  • $begingroup$
    In what direction will you be rolling. Also: what have you tried?
    $endgroup$
    – clathratus
    Mar 20 at 20:04










  • $begingroup$
    There are several problems with your description. First of all, to get a conic surface you must fold a circular sector, and not a trapezoid as in your picture. Moreover, you cannot get a uniformly tight structure: to get 12 mm at the base you should roll 120 layers of paper, but for 3 mm on top you need only 30 layers.
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 20 at 21:26










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the responses. @ Aretino: I added a "real-world" example to show what I'm trying to accomplish.
    $endgroup$
    – Alarik
    Mar 20 at 21:52















$begingroup$
In what direction will you be rolling. Also: what have you tried?
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Mar 20 at 20:04




$begingroup$
In what direction will you be rolling. Also: what have you tried?
$endgroup$
– clathratus
Mar 20 at 20:04












$begingroup$
There are several problems with your description. First of all, to get a conic surface you must fold a circular sector, and not a trapezoid as in your picture. Moreover, you cannot get a uniformly tight structure: to get 12 mm at the base you should roll 120 layers of paper, but for 3 mm on top you need only 30 layers.
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Mar 20 at 21:26




$begingroup$
There are several problems with your description. First of all, to get a conic surface you must fold a circular sector, and not a trapezoid as in your picture. Moreover, you cannot get a uniformly tight structure: to get 12 mm at the base you should roll 120 layers of paper, but for 3 mm on top you need only 30 layers.
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Mar 20 at 21:26












$begingroup$
Thank you for the responses. @ Aretino: I added a "real-world" example to show what I'm trying to accomplish.
$endgroup$
– Alarik
Mar 20 at 21:52




$begingroup$
Thank you for the responses. @ Aretino: I added a "real-world" example to show what I'm trying to accomplish.
$endgroup$
– Alarik
Mar 20 at 21:52










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

If we slightly simplify the situation, we can say that at the top (and at the bottom) the paper is arranged in concentric circles. If $t=0.1$mm is the thickness of the paper, we get a radius $r_n = n cdot t$ for the $n$th circle. The circumference of the $n$th circle is $2 pi r_n$. The total length of the paper (for $N$ circles) is the sum of the circumferences
$$
l = sum_n=1^N 2 pi r_n = 2 pi cdot t cdot sum_n=1^N n = 2 pi cdot t cdot fracN(N+1)2
$$

and the diameter is $d = 2 N t$.



So if you want a diameter $d$, then you need $N=fracd2t$ many layers resulting in a length of
$$l = 2 pi cdot t cdot fracfracd2tleft(fracd2t+1right)2 = pi cdot fracd2 left(fracd2t+1right).$$



According to the pictures in your clarification, $A$ and $C$ are independent of each other, thus the above calculation can be done seperatly for the top and the bottom.



At the top, you want the diameter to be $d=3$mm, resulting in a length of $Acong 65$mm.
At the bottom, you want the diameter to be $d=12$mm, thus $C cong 1100$mm would do the trick.



However, rolling up a meter of paper perfectly tight is probably not physically feasible, thus the calculation might not agree with experimental results.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The sum is $sum_n=1^N n=N(N+1)/2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 21 at 8:16











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155904%2fdimensions-of-paper-needed-to-roll-a-cone-updated-with-clarifications%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

If we slightly simplify the situation, we can say that at the top (and at the bottom) the paper is arranged in concentric circles. If $t=0.1$mm is the thickness of the paper, we get a radius $r_n = n cdot t$ for the $n$th circle. The circumference of the $n$th circle is $2 pi r_n$. The total length of the paper (for $N$ circles) is the sum of the circumferences
$$
l = sum_n=1^N 2 pi r_n = 2 pi cdot t cdot sum_n=1^N n = 2 pi cdot t cdot fracN(N+1)2
$$

and the diameter is $d = 2 N t$.



So if you want a diameter $d$, then you need $N=fracd2t$ many layers resulting in a length of
$$l = 2 pi cdot t cdot fracfracd2tleft(fracd2t+1right)2 = pi cdot fracd2 left(fracd2t+1right).$$



According to the pictures in your clarification, $A$ and $C$ are independent of each other, thus the above calculation can be done seperatly for the top and the bottom.



At the top, you want the diameter to be $d=3$mm, resulting in a length of $Acong 65$mm.
At the bottom, you want the diameter to be $d=12$mm, thus $C cong 1100$mm would do the trick.



However, rolling up a meter of paper perfectly tight is probably not physically feasible, thus the calculation might not agree with experimental results.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The sum is $sum_n=1^N n=N(N+1)/2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 21 at 8:16















1












$begingroup$

If we slightly simplify the situation, we can say that at the top (and at the bottom) the paper is arranged in concentric circles. If $t=0.1$mm is the thickness of the paper, we get a radius $r_n = n cdot t$ for the $n$th circle. The circumference of the $n$th circle is $2 pi r_n$. The total length of the paper (for $N$ circles) is the sum of the circumferences
$$
l = sum_n=1^N 2 pi r_n = 2 pi cdot t cdot sum_n=1^N n = 2 pi cdot t cdot fracN(N+1)2
$$

and the diameter is $d = 2 N t$.



So if you want a diameter $d$, then you need $N=fracd2t$ many layers resulting in a length of
$$l = 2 pi cdot t cdot fracfracd2tleft(fracd2t+1right)2 = pi cdot fracd2 left(fracd2t+1right).$$



According to the pictures in your clarification, $A$ and $C$ are independent of each other, thus the above calculation can be done seperatly for the top and the bottom.



At the top, you want the diameter to be $d=3$mm, resulting in a length of $Acong 65$mm.
At the bottom, you want the diameter to be $d=12$mm, thus $C cong 1100$mm would do the trick.



However, rolling up a meter of paper perfectly tight is probably not physically feasible, thus the calculation might not agree with experimental results.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The sum is $sum_n=1^N n=N(N+1)/2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 21 at 8:16













1












1








1





$begingroup$

If we slightly simplify the situation, we can say that at the top (and at the bottom) the paper is arranged in concentric circles. If $t=0.1$mm is the thickness of the paper, we get a radius $r_n = n cdot t$ for the $n$th circle. The circumference of the $n$th circle is $2 pi r_n$. The total length of the paper (for $N$ circles) is the sum of the circumferences
$$
l = sum_n=1^N 2 pi r_n = 2 pi cdot t cdot sum_n=1^N n = 2 pi cdot t cdot fracN(N+1)2
$$

and the diameter is $d = 2 N t$.



So if you want a diameter $d$, then you need $N=fracd2t$ many layers resulting in a length of
$$l = 2 pi cdot t cdot fracfracd2tleft(fracd2t+1right)2 = pi cdot fracd2 left(fracd2t+1right).$$



According to the pictures in your clarification, $A$ and $C$ are independent of each other, thus the above calculation can be done seperatly for the top and the bottom.



At the top, you want the diameter to be $d=3$mm, resulting in a length of $Acong 65$mm.
At the bottom, you want the diameter to be $d=12$mm, thus $C cong 1100$mm would do the trick.



However, rolling up a meter of paper perfectly tight is probably not physically feasible, thus the calculation might not agree with experimental results.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



If we slightly simplify the situation, we can say that at the top (and at the bottom) the paper is arranged in concentric circles. If $t=0.1$mm is the thickness of the paper, we get a radius $r_n = n cdot t$ for the $n$th circle. The circumference of the $n$th circle is $2 pi r_n$. The total length of the paper (for $N$ circles) is the sum of the circumferences
$$
l = sum_n=1^N 2 pi r_n = 2 pi cdot t cdot sum_n=1^N n = 2 pi cdot t cdot fracN(N+1)2
$$

and the diameter is $d = 2 N t$.



So if you want a diameter $d$, then you need $N=fracd2t$ many layers resulting in a length of
$$l = 2 pi cdot t cdot fracfracd2tleft(fracd2t+1right)2 = pi cdot fracd2 left(fracd2t+1right).$$



According to the pictures in your clarification, $A$ and $C$ are independent of each other, thus the above calculation can be done seperatly for the top and the bottom.



At the top, you want the diameter to be $d=3$mm, resulting in a length of $Acong 65$mm.
At the bottom, you want the diameter to be $d=12$mm, thus $C cong 1100$mm would do the trick.



However, rolling up a meter of paper perfectly tight is probably not physically feasible, thus the calculation might not agree with experimental results.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 21 at 11:54

























answered Mar 21 at 1:03









StrichcoderStrichcoder

1866




1866







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The sum is $sum_n=1^N n=N(N+1)/2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 21 at 8:16












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The sum is $sum_n=1^N n=N(N+1)/2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 21 at 8:16







1




1




$begingroup$
The sum is $sum_n=1^N n=N(N+1)/2$.
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Mar 21 at 8:16




$begingroup$
The sum is $sum_n=1^N n=N(N+1)/2$.
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Mar 21 at 8:16

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155904%2fdimensions-of-paper-needed-to-roll-a-cone-updated-with-clarifications%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer