inequality related to square the sum of any two sides of a triangle with respect to square of other sideFastest way to check whether the triangle inequality is satisfiedThree sides of a $triangle$ are known. If a circle with it's center on base of $triangle$ touches the other two sides , find the radius of circle.Probability distribution of the third side in triangletriangle inequality theoremGeometry: Determining the length of a side of a triangleTriangle: One side, opposite angle and ratio of other sides givenObtuse Triangle geometry.A conjecture related to any triangleA conjecture about the sum of the areas of three triangles built on the sides of any given triangleProof for area of an equilateral triangle with respect to one side?

Is "/bin/[.exe" a legitimate file? [Cygwin, Windows 10]

Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?

Why were 5.25" floppy drives cheaper than 8"?

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

Does int main() need a declaration on C++?

How to show a landlord what we have in savings?

Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions

What would the climate of a planetwide city be like?

Why do I get negative height?

How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?

Convert seconds to minutes

GFCI outlets - can they be repaired? Are they really needed at the end of a circuit?

Do Iron Man suits sport waste management systems?

How does a dynamic QR code work?

What is the fastest integer factorization to break RSA?

Notepad++ delete until colon for every line with replace all

Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?

Are British MPs missing the point, with these 'Indicative Votes'?

Am I breaking OOP practice with this architecture?

OP Amp not amplifying audio signal

What is a Samsaran Word™?

Did 'Cinema Songs' exist during Hiranyakshipu's time?

How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?

how do we prove that a sum of two periods is still a period?



inequality related to square the sum of any two sides of a triangle with respect to square of other side


Fastest way to check whether the triangle inequality is satisfiedThree sides of a $triangle$ are known. If a circle with it's center on base of $triangle$ touches the other two sides , find the radius of circle.Probability distribution of the third side in triangletriangle inequality theoremGeometry: Determining the length of a side of a triangleTriangle: One side, opposite angle and ratio of other sides givenObtuse Triangle geometry.A conjecture related to any triangleA conjecture about the sum of the areas of three triangles built on the sides of any given triangleProof for area of an equilateral triangle with respect to one side?













1












$begingroup$


Consider a,b,c are three side of a triangle. Now we need to find the relation between square the them sum of any two side of triangle with respect to third side.



My approach



As we know that the sum of any two sides of triangle will always be greater then the third side i.e




$(a+b)>c $



$(b+c)>a$



$(a+c)>b$




Take square on both side then




$a^2+b^2+2ab>c^2$



$ c^2+b^2+2bc>a^2$



$a^2+c^2+2ac>b^2$




Add last three equations




$2a^2+2b^2+2c^2-a^2-b^2-c^2>-2(ab+bc+ac)$



$a^2+b^2+c^2>-2(ab+bc+ac)$




Edited :
Corrected equation
But the correct answer is this $a^2 + b^2 + c^2 < 2(ab + bc + ca)$



What am I doing wrong?Please guide.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Why not try your approach with inequalities like $a-c>-b$? This is just another form of your initial inequality.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Mar 20 at 18:06











  • $begingroup$
    But what do you want to prove? That $a^2+b^2+c^2geq2(ab+bc+ac)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 20 at 18:08










  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.Mathva I want to prove this a2+b2+c2>2(ab+bc+ac)
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:09











  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelBurr I will try this approach as well, but what is wrong with my approch?
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:10











  • $begingroup$
    But, @Thinker, the inequality $2(ab+bc+ac)geq a^2+b^2+c^2$ you want to prove is trivial from your last step
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 20 at 18:11
















1












$begingroup$


Consider a,b,c are three side of a triangle. Now we need to find the relation between square the them sum of any two side of triangle with respect to third side.



My approach



As we know that the sum of any two sides of triangle will always be greater then the third side i.e




$(a+b)>c $



$(b+c)>a$



$(a+c)>b$




Take square on both side then




$a^2+b^2+2ab>c^2$



$ c^2+b^2+2bc>a^2$



$a^2+c^2+2ac>b^2$




Add last three equations




$2a^2+2b^2+2c^2-a^2-b^2-c^2>-2(ab+bc+ac)$



$a^2+b^2+c^2>-2(ab+bc+ac)$




Edited :
Corrected equation
But the correct answer is this $a^2 + b^2 + c^2 < 2(ab + bc + ca)$



What am I doing wrong?Please guide.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Why not try your approach with inequalities like $a-c>-b$? This is just another form of your initial inequality.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Mar 20 at 18:06











  • $begingroup$
    But what do you want to prove? That $a^2+b^2+c^2geq2(ab+bc+ac)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 20 at 18:08










  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.Mathva I want to prove this a2+b2+c2>2(ab+bc+ac)
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:09











  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelBurr I will try this approach as well, but what is wrong with my approch?
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:10











  • $begingroup$
    But, @Thinker, the inequality $2(ab+bc+ac)geq a^2+b^2+c^2$ you want to prove is trivial from your last step
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 20 at 18:11














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Consider a,b,c are three side of a triangle. Now we need to find the relation between square the them sum of any two side of triangle with respect to third side.



My approach



As we know that the sum of any two sides of triangle will always be greater then the third side i.e




$(a+b)>c $



$(b+c)>a$



$(a+c)>b$




Take square on both side then




$a^2+b^2+2ab>c^2$



$ c^2+b^2+2bc>a^2$



$a^2+c^2+2ac>b^2$




Add last three equations




$2a^2+2b^2+2c^2-a^2-b^2-c^2>-2(ab+bc+ac)$



$a^2+b^2+c^2>-2(ab+bc+ac)$




Edited :
Corrected equation
But the correct answer is this $a^2 + b^2 + c^2 < 2(ab + bc + ca)$



What am I doing wrong?Please guide.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Consider a,b,c are three side of a triangle. Now we need to find the relation between square the them sum of any two side of triangle with respect to third side.



My approach



As we know that the sum of any two sides of triangle will always be greater then the third side i.e




$(a+b)>c $



$(b+c)>a$



$(a+c)>b$




Take square on both side then




$a^2+b^2+2ab>c^2$



$ c^2+b^2+2bc>a^2$



$a^2+c^2+2ac>b^2$




Add last three equations




$2a^2+2b^2+2c^2-a^2-b^2-c^2>-2(ab+bc+ac)$



$a^2+b^2+c^2>-2(ab+bc+ac)$




Edited :
Corrected equation
But the correct answer is this $a^2 + b^2 + c^2 < 2(ab + bc + ca)$



What am I doing wrong?Please guide.







geometry triangles






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 20 at 18:20









Mostafa Ayaz

18.2k31040




18.2k31040










asked Mar 20 at 18:00









ThinkerThinker

355




355











  • $begingroup$
    Why not try your approach with inequalities like $a-c>-b$? This is just another form of your initial inequality.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Mar 20 at 18:06











  • $begingroup$
    But what do you want to prove? That $a^2+b^2+c^2geq2(ab+bc+ac)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 20 at 18:08










  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.Mathva I want to prove this a2+b2+c2>2(ab+bc+ac)
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:09











  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelBurr I will try this approach as well, but what is wrong with my approch?
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:10











  • $begingroup$
    But, @Thinker, the inequality $2(ab+bc+ac)geq a^2+b^2+c^2$ you want to prove is trivial from your last step
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 20 at 18:11

















  • $begingroup$
    Why not try your approach with inequalities like $a-c>-b$? This is just another form of your initial inequality.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Burr
    Mar 20 at 18:06











  • $begingroup$
    But what do you want to prove? That $a^2+b^2+c^2geq2(ab+bc+ac)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 20 at 18:08










  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.Mathva I want to prove this a2+b2+c2>2(ab+bc+ac)
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:09











  • $begingroup$
    @MichaelBurr I will try this approach as well, but what is wrong with my approch?
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:10











  • $begingroup$
    But, @Thinker, the inequality $2(ab+bc+ac)geq a^2+b^2+c^2$ you want to prove is trivial from your last step
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Mathva
    Mar 20 at 18:11
















$begingroup$
Why not try your approach with inequalities like $a-c>-b$? This is just another form of your initial inequality.
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Mar 20 at 18:06





$begingroup$
Why not try your approach with inequalities like $a-c>-b$? This is just another form of your initial inequality.
$endgroup$
– Michael Burr
Mar 20 at 18:06













$begingroup$
But what do you want to prove? That $a^2+b^2+c^2geq2(ab+bc+ac)$?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
Mar 20 at 18:08




$begingroup$
But what do you want to prove? That $a^2+b^2+c^2geq2(ab+bc+ac)$?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
Mar 20 at 18:08












$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva I want to prove this a2+b2+c2>2(ab+bc+ac)
$endgroup$
– Thinker
Mar 20 at 18:09





$begingroup$
@Dr.Mathva I want to prove this a2+b2+c2>2(ab+bc+ac)
$endgroup$
– Thinker
Mar 20 at 18:09













$begingroup$
@MichaelBurr I will try this approach as well, but what is wrong with my approch?
$endgroup$
– Thinker
Mar 20 at 18:10





$begingroup$
@MichaelBurr I will try this approach as well, but what is wrong with my approch?
$endgroup$
– Thinker
Mar 20 at 18:10













$begingroup$
But, @Thinker, the inequality $2(ab+bc+ac)geq a^2+b^2+c^2$ you want to prove is trivial from your last step
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
Mar 20 at 18:11





$begingroup$
But, @Thinker, the inequality $2(ab+bc+ac)geq a^2+b^2+c^2$ you want to prove is trivial from your last step
$endgroup$
– Dr. Mathva
Mar 20 at 18:11











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Repeat your reasoning starting with this form of triangular inequalities:
$$
|a-b|<c,quad |b-c|<a,quad |c-a|<b,
$$

that is:
$$
(a-b)^2<c^2,quad (b-c)^2<a^2,quad (c-a)^2<b^2.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes this triangular inequalities is providing the correct result. But I still have one doubt left . What is wrong with my approach. triangle holds a property that sum of any two side is always greater then third side. Why reasoning based on this property is giving unexpected result?
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your approach is fine, but leads to a trivial result, as you have on the right hand side a negative quantity and on the left hand side a positive quantity.
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 20 at 18:38


















1












$begingroup$

The inequality you attained is trivial as the lengths of sides of a triangle can't be negative or zero. In fact the correct answer comes from$$(a-b)^2+(a-c)^2+(b-c)^2< c^2+b^2+a^2$$which is a direct outcome of triangle inequality you mentioned above (how?).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    My reasoning was based on the property that "The sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is greater than the length of the third side. Similarly, the difference between the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is less than the length of the third side". But I understand that it is proving something that is not possible in as a,b, all will be greated than zero. But question is why?
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:36











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155792%2finequality-related-to-square-the-sum-of-any-two-sides-of-a-triangle-with-respect%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Repeat your reasoning starting with this form of triangular inequalities:
$$
|a-b|<c,quad |b-c|<a,quad |c-a|<b,
$$

that is:
$$
(a-b)^2<c^2,quad (b-c)^2<a^2,quad (c-a)^2<b^2.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes this triangular inequalities is providing the correct result. But I still have one doubt left . What is wrong with my approach. triangle holds a property that sum of any two side is always greater then third side. Why reasoning based on this property is giving unexpected result?
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your approach is fine, but leads to a trivial result, as you have on the right hand side a negative quantity and on the left hand side a positive quantity.
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 20 at 18:38















2












$begingroup$

Repeat your reasoning starting with this form of triangular inequalities:
$$
|a-b|<c,quad |b-c|<a,quad |c-a|<b,
$$

that is:
$$
(a-b)^2<c^2,quad (b-c)^2<a^2,quad (c-a)^2<b^2.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yes this triangular inequalities is providing the correct result. But I still have one doubt left . What is wrong with my approach. triangle holds a property that sum of any two side is always greater then third side. Why reasoning based on this property is giving unexpected result?
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your approach is fine, but leads to a trivial result, as you have on the right hand side a negative quantity and on the left hand side a positive quantity.
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 20 at 18:38













2












2








2





$begingroup$

Repeat your reasoning starting with this form of triangular inequalities:
$$
|a-b|<c,quad |b-c|<a,quad |c-a|<b,
$$

that is:
$$
(a-b)^2<c^2,quad (b-c)^2<a^2,quad (c-a)^2<b^2.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Repeat your reasoning starting with this form of triangular inequalities:
$$
|a-b|<c,quad |b-c|<a,quad |c-a|<b,
$$

that is:
$$
(a-b)^2<c^2,quad (b-c)^2<a^2,quad (c-a)^2<b^2.
$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 20 at 18:23

























answered Mar 20 at 18:16









AretinoAretino

25.8k31545




25.8k31545











  • $begingroup$
    Yes this triangular inequalities is providing the correct result. But I still have one doubt left . What is wrong with my approach. triangle holds a property that sum of any two side is always greater then third side. Why reasoning based on this property is giving unexpected result?
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your approach is fine, but leads to a trivial result, as you have on the right hand side a negative quantity and on the left hand side a positive quantity.
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 20 at 18:38
















  • $begingroup$
    Yes this triangular inequalities is providing the correct result. But I still have one doubt left . What is wrong with my approach. triangle holds a property that sum of any two side is always greater then third side. Why reasoning based on this property is giving unexpected result?
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your approach is fine, but leads to a trivial result, as you have on the right hand side a negative quantity and on the left hand side a positive quantity.
    $endgroup$
    – Aretino
    Mar 20 at 18:38















$begingroup$
Yes this triangular inequalities is providing the correct result. But I still have one doubt left . What is wrong with my approach. triangle holds a property that sum of any two side is always greater then third side. Why reasoning based on this property is giving unexpected result?
$endgroup$
– Thinker
Mar 20 at 18:28




$begingroup$
Yes this triangular inequalities is providing the correct result. But I still have one doubt left . What is wrong with my approach. triangle holds a property that sum of any two side is always greater then third side. Why reasoning based on this property is giving unexpected result?
$endgroup$
– Thinker
Mar 20 at 18:28




1




1




$begingroup$
Your approach is fine, but leads to a trivial result, as you have on the right hand side a negative quantity and on the left hand side a positive quantity.
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Mar 20 at 18:38




$begingroup$
Your approach is fine, but leads to a trivial result, as you have on the right hand side a negative quantity and on the left hand side a positive quantity.
$endgroup$
– Aretino
Mar 20 at 18:38











1












$begingroup$

The inequality you attained is trivial as the lengths of sides of a triangle can't be negative or zero. In fact the correct answer comes from$$(a-b)^2+(a-c)^2+(b-c)^2< c^2+b^2+a^2$$which is a direct outcome of triangle inequality you mentioned above (how?).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    My reasoning was based on the property that "The sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is greater than the length of the third side. Similarly, the difference between the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is less than the length of the third side". But I understand that it is proving something that is not possible in as a,b, all will be greated than zero. But question is why?
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:36















1












$begingroup$

The inequality you attained is trivial as the lengths of sides of a triangle can't be negative or zero. In fact the correct answer comes from$$(a-b)^2+(a-c)^2+(b-c)^2< c^2+b^2+a^2$$which is a direct outcome of triangle inequality you mentioned above (how?).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    My reasoning was based on the property that "The sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is greater than the length of the third side. Similarly, the difference between the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is less than the length of the third side". But I understand that it is proving something that is not possible in as a,b, all will be greated than zero. But question is why?
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:36













1












1








1





$begingroup$

The inequality you attained is trivial as the lengths of sides of a triangle can't be negative or zero. In fact the correct answer comes from$$(a-b)^2+(a-c)^2+(b-c)^2< c^2+b^2+a^2$$which is a direct outcome of triangle inequality you mentioned above (how?).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The inequality you attained is trivial as the lengths of sides of a triangle can't be negative or zero. In fact the correct answer comes from$$(a-b)^2+(a-c)^2+(b-c)^2< c^2+b^2+a^2$$which is a direct outcome of triangle inequality you mentioned above (how?).







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 20 at 18:38

























answered Mar 20 at 18:24









Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz

18.2k31040




18.2k31040











  • $begingroup$
    My reasoning was based on the property that "The sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is greater than the length of the third side. Similarly, the difference between the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is less than the length of the third side". But I understand that it is proving something that is not possible in as a,b, all will be greated than zero. But question is why?
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:36
















  • $begingroup$
    My reasoning was based on the property that "The sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is greater than the length of the third side. Similarly, the difference between the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is less than the length of the third side". But I understand that it is proving something that is not possible in as a,b, all will be greated than zero. But question is why?
    $endgroup$
    – Thinker
    Mar 20 at 18:36















$begingroup$
My reasoning was based on the property that "The sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is greater than the length of the third side. Similarly, the difference between the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is less than the length of the third side". But I understand that it is proving something that is not possible in as a,b, all will be greated than zero. But question is why?
$endgroup$
– Thinker
Mar 20 at 18:36




$begingroup$
My reasoning was based on the property that "The sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is greater than the length of the third side. Similarly, the difference between the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is less than the length of the third side". But I understand that it is proving something that is not possible in as a,b, all will be greated than zero. But question is why?
$endgroup$
– Thinker
Mar 20 at 18:36

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155792%2finequality-related-to-square-the-sum-of-any-two-sides-of-a-triangle-with-respect%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye