HPO formalism Contents Introduction History Propositions History Projection Operators Temporal Quantum Logic References Navigation menuQuantum Logic and the Histories Approach to Quantum Theory

LogicQuantum measurement


temporalquantum logicChris Ishamquantum mechanicalpropositionsHilbert spaceobservablesHermitian operatorsprojection operatorquantum logiclatticequantum logictensor productlatticeidentity operator




The History Projection Operator (HPO) formalism is an approach to temporal quantum logic developed by Chris Isham. It deals with the logical structure of quantum mechanical propositions asserted at different points in time.




Contents





  • 1 Introduction


  • 2 History Propositions

    • 2.1 Homogeneous Histories


    • 2.2 Inhomogeneous Histories



  • 3 History Projection Operators


  • 4 Temporal Quantum Logic

    • 4.1 Conjunction (AND)


    • 4.2 Disjunction (OR)


    • 4.3 Negation (NOT)


    • 4.4 Example: Two-time history



  • 5 References




Introduction


In standard quantum mechanics a physical system is associated with a Hilbert space Hdisplaystyle mathcal H. States of the system at a fixed time are represented by normalised vectors in the space and physical observables are represented by Hermitian operators on Hdisplaystyle mathcal H.


A physical proposition Pdisplaystyle ,P about the system at a fixed time can be represented by a projection operator P^displaystyle hat P on Hdisplaystyle mathcal H (See quantum logic). This representation links together the lattice operations in the lattice of logical propositions and the lattice of projection operators on a Hilbert space (See quantum logic).


The HPO formalism is a natural extension of these ideas to propositions about the system that are concerned with more than one time.



History Propositions



Homogeneous Histories


A homogeneous history proposition αdisplaystyle ,alpha is a sequence of single-time propositions αtidisplaystyle alpha _t_i specified at different times t1<t2<…<tndisplaystyle t_1<t_2<ldots <t_n. These times are called the temporal support of the history. We shall denote the proposition αdisplaystyle ,alpha as (α1,α2,…,αn)displaystyle (alpha _1,alpha _2,ldots ,alpha _n) and read it as


"αt1displaystyle alpha _t_1 at time t1displaystyle t_1 is true and then αt2displaystyle alpha _t_2 at time t2displaystyle t_2 is true and then …displaystyle ldots and then αtndisplaystyle alpha _t_n at time tndisplaystyle t_n is true"



Inhomogeneous Histories


Not all history propositions can be represented by a sequence of single-time propositions are different times. These are called inhomogeneous history propositions. An example is the proposition αdisplaystyle ,alpha OR βdisplaystyle ,beta for two homogeneous histories α,βdisplaystyle ,alpha ,beta .



History Projection Operators


The key observation of the HPO formalism is to represent history propositions by projection operators on a history Hilbert space. This is where the name "History Projection Operator" (HPO) comes from.


For a homogeneous history α=(α1,α2,…,αn)displaystyle alpha =(alpha _1,alpha _2,ldots ,alpha _n) we can use the tensor product to define a projector


α^:=α^t1⊗α^t2⊗…⊗α^tndisplaystyle hat alpha :=hat alpha _t_1otimes hat alpha _t_2otimes ldots otimes hat alpha _t_n


where α^tidisplaystyle hat alpha _t_i is the projection operator on Hdisplaystyle mathcal H that represents the proposition αtidisplaystyle alpha _t_i at time tidisplaystyle t_i.


This α^displaystyle hat alpha is a projection operator on the tensor product "history Hilbert space" H=H⊗H⊗…⊗Hdisplaystyle H=mathcal Hotimes mathcal Hotimes ldots otimes mathcal H


Not all projection operators on Hdisplaystyle H can be written as the sum of tensor products of the form α^displaystyle hat alpha . These other projection operators are used to represent inhomogeneous histories by applying lattice operations to homogeneous histories.



Temporal Quantum Logic


Representing history propositions by projectors on the history Hilbert space naturally encodes the logical structure of history propositions. The lattice operations on the set of projection operations on the history Hilbert space Hdisplaystyle H can be applied to model the lattice of logical operations on history propositions.


If two homogeneous histories αdisplaystyle ,alpha and βdisplaystyle ,beta don't share the same temporal support they can be modified so that they do. If tidisplaystyle ,t_i is in the temporal support of αdisplaystyle ,alpha but not βdisplaystyle ,beta (for example) then a new homogeneous history proposition which differs from βdisplaystyle ,beta by including the "always true" proposition at each time tidisplaystyle ,t_i can be formed. In this way the temporal supports of α,βdisplaystyle ,alpha ,beta can always be joined together. What shall therefore assume that all homogeneous histories share the same temporal support.


We now present the logical operations for homogeneous history propositions αdisplaystyle ,alpha and βdisplaystyle ,beta such that α^β^=β^α^displaystyle hat alpha hat beta =hat beta hat alpha



Conjunction (AND)


If αdisplaystyle alpha and βdisplaystyle beta are two homogeneous histories then the history proposition "αdisplaystyle ,alpha and βdisplaystyle ,beta " is also a homogeneous history. It is represented by the projection operator


α∧β^:=α^β^displaystyle widehat alpha wedge beta :=hat alpha hat beta (=β^α^)displaystyle (=hat beta hat alpha )



Disjunction (OR)


If αdisplaystyle alpha and βdisplaystyle beta are two homogeneous histories then the history proposition "αdisplaystyle ,alpha or βdisplaystyle ,beta " is in general not a homogeneous history. It is represented by the projection operator


α∨β^:=α^+β^−α^β^displaystyle widehat alpha vee beta :=hat alpha +hat beta -hat alpha hat beta



Negation (NOT)


The negation operation in the lattice of projection operators takes P^displaystyle hat P to


¬P^:=I−P^displaystyle neg hat P:=mathbb I -hat P


where Idisplaystyle mathbb I is the identity operator on the Hilbert space. Thus the projector used to represent the proposition ¬αdisplaystyle neg alpha (i.e. "not αdisplaystyle alpha ") is


¬α^:=I−α^displaystyle widehat neg alpha :=mathbb I -hat alpha


where Idisplaystyle mathbb I is the identity operator on the history Hilbert space.



Example: Two-time history


As an example, consider the negation of the two-time homogeneous history proposition α=(α1,α2)displaystyle ,alpha =(alpha _1,alpha _2). The projector to represent the proposition ¬αdisplaystyle neg alpha is


¬α^=I⊗I−α^1⊗α^2displaystyle widehat neg alpha =mathbb I otimes mathbb I -hat alpha _1otimes hat alpha _2
=(I−α^1)⊗α^2+α^1⊗(I−α^2)+(I−α^1)⊗(I−α^2)displaystyle =(mathbb I -hat alpha _1)otimes hat alpha _2+hat alpha _1otimes (mathbb I -hat alpha _2)+(mathbb I -hat alpha _1)otimes (mathbb I -hat alpha _2)


The terms which appear in this expression:


  • (I−α^1)⊗α^2displaystyle (mathbb I -hat alpha _1)otimes hat alpha _2

  • α^1⊗(I−α^2)displaystyle hat alpha _1otimes (mathbb I -hat alpha _2)


  • (I−α^1)⊗(I−α^2)displaystyle (mathbb I -hat alpha _1)otimes (mathbb I -hat alpha _2).

can each be interpreted as follows:



  • α1displaystyle ,alpha _1 is false and α2displaystyle ,alpha _2 is true


  • α1displaystyle ,alpha _1 is true and α2displaystyle ,alpha _2 is false

  • both α1displaystyle ,alpha _1 is false and α2displaystyle ,alpha _2 is false

These three homogeneous histories, joined together with the OR operation, include all the possibilities for how the proposition "α1displaystyle ,alpha _1 and then α2displaystyle ,alpha _2" can be false. We therefore see that the definition of ¬α^displaystyle widehat neg alpha agrees with what the proposition ¬αdisplaystyle neg alpha should mean.



References


  • C.J. Isham, Quantum Logic and the Histories Approach to Quantum Theory, J.Math.Phys. 35 (1994) 2157-2185, arXiv:gr-qc/9308006v1

Popular posts from this blog

How should I support this large drywall patch? Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How do I cover large gaps in drywall?How do I keep drywall around a patch from crumbling?Can I glue a second layer of drywall?How to patch long strip on drywall?Large drywall patch: how to avoid bulging seams?Drywall Mesh Patch vs. Bulge? To remove or not to remove?How to fix this drywall job?Prep drywall before backsplashWhat's the best way to fix this horrible drywall patch job?Drywall patching using 3M Patch Plus Primer

random experiment with two different functions on unit interval Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Random variable and probability space notionsRandom Walk with EdgesFinding functions where the increase over a random interval is Poisson distributedNumber of days until dayCan an observed event in fact be of zero probability?Unit random processmodels of coins and uniform distributionHow to get the number of successes given $n$ trials , probability $P$ and a random variable $X$Absorbing Markov chain in a computer. Is “almost every” turned into always convergence in computer executions?Stopped random walk is not uniformly integrable

Lowndes Grove History Architecture References Navigation menu32°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661132°48′6″N 79°57′58″W / 32.80167°N 79.96611°W / 32.80167; -79.9661178002500"National Register Information System"Historic houses of South Carolina"Lowndes Grove""+32° 48' 6.00", −79° 57' 58.00""Lowndes Grove, Charleston County (260 St. Margaret St., Charleston)""Lowndes Grove"The Charleston ExpositionIt Happened in South Carolina"Lowndes Grove (House), Saint Margaret Street & Sixth Avenue, Charleston, Charleston County, SC(Photographs)"Plantations of the Carolina Low Countrye