HPO formalism Contents Introduction History Propositions History Projection Operators Temporal Quantum Logic References Navigation menuQuantum Logic and the Histories Approach to Quantum Theory

LogicQuantum measurement


temporalquantum logicChris Ishamquantum mechanicalpropositionsHilbert spaceobservablesHermitian operatorsprojection operatorquantum logiclatticequantum logictensor productlatticeidentity operator




The History Projection Operator (HPO) formalism is an approach to temporal quantum logic developed by Chris Isham. It deals with the logical structure of quantum mechanical propositions asserted at different points in time.




Contents





  • 1 Introduction


  • 2 History Propositions

    • 2.1 Homogeneous Histories


    • 2.2 Inhomogeneous Histories



  • 3 History Projection Operators


  • 4 Temporal Quantum Logic

    • 4.1 Conjunction (AND)


    • 4.2 Disjunction (OR)


    • 4.3 Negation (NOT)


    • 4.4 Example: Two-time history



  • 5 References




Introduction


In standard quantum mechanics a physical system is associated with a Hilbert space Hdisplaystyle mathcal H. States of the system at a fixed time are represented by normalised vectors in the space and physical observables are represented by Hermitian operators on Hdisplaystyle mathcal H.


A physical proposition Pdisplaystyle ,P about the system at a fixed time can be represented by a projection operator P^displaystyle hat P on Hdisplaystyle mathcal H (See quantum logic). This representation links together the lattice operations in the lattice of logical propositions and the lattice of projection operators on a Hilbert space (See quantum logic).


The HPO formalism is a natural extension of these ideas to propositions about the system that are concerned with more than one time.



History Propositions



Homogeneous Histories


A homogeneous history proposition αdisplaystyle ,alpha is a sequence of single-time propositions αtidisplaystyle alpha _t_i specified at different times t1<t2<…<tndisplaystyle t_1<t_2<ldots <t_n. These times are called the temporal support of the history. We shall denote the proposition αdisplaystyle ,alpha as (α1,α2,…,αn)displaystyle (alpha _1,alpha _2,ldots ,alpha _n) and read it as


"αt1displaystyle alpha _t_1 at time t1displaystyle t_1 is true and then αt2displaystyle alpha _t_2 at time t2displaystyle t_2 is true and then …displaystyle ldots and then αtndisplaystyle alpha _t_n at time tndisplaystyle t_n is true"



Inhomogeneous Histories


Not all history propositions can be represented by a sequence of single-time propositions are different times. These are called inhomogeneous history propositions. An example is the proposition αdisplaystyle ,alpha OR βdisplaystyle ,beta for two homogeneous histories α,βdisplaystyle ,alpha ,beta .



History Projection Operators


The key observation of the HPO formalism is to represent history propositions by projection operators on a history Hilbert space. This is where the name "History Projection Operator" (HPO) comes from.


For a homogeneous history α=(α1,α2,…,αn)displaystyle alpha =(alpha _1,alpha _2,ldots ,alpha _n) we can use the tensor product to define a projector


α^:=α^t1⊗α^t2⊗…⊗α^tndisplaystyle hat alpha :=hat alpha _t_1otimes hat alpha _t_2otimes ldots otimes hat alpha _t_n


where α^tidisplaystyle hat alpha _t_i is the projection operator on Hdisplaystyle mathcal H that represents the proposition αtidisplaystyle alpha _t_i at time tidisplaystyle t_i.


This α^displaystyle hat alpha is a projection operator on the tensor product "history Hilbert space" H=H⊗H⊗…⊗Hdisplaystyle H=mathcal Hotimes mathcal Hotimes ldots otimes mathcal H


Not all projection operators on Hdisplaystyle H can be written as the sum of tensor products of the form α^displaystyle hat alpha . These other projection operators are used to represent inhomogeneous histories by applying lattice operations to homogeneous histories.



Temporal Quantum Logic


Representing history propositions by projectors on the history Hilbert space naturally encodes the logical structure of history propositions. The lattice operations on the set of projection operations on the history Hilbert space Hdisplaystyle H can be applied to model the lattice of logical operations on history propositions.


If two homogeneous histories αdisplaystyle ,alpha and βdisplaystyle ,beta don't share the same temporal support they can be modified so that they do. If tidisplaystyle ,t_i is in the temporal support of αdisplaystyle ,alpha but not βdisplaystyle ,beta (for example) then a new homogeneous history proposition which differs from βdisplaystyle ,beta by including the "always true" proposition at each time tidisplaystyle ,t_i can be formed. In this way the temporal supports of α,βdisplaystyle ,alpha ,beta can always be joined together. What shall therefore assume that all homogeneous histories share the same temporal support.


We now present the logical operations for homogeneous history propositions αdisplaystyle ,alpha and βdisplaystyle ,beta such that α^β^=β^α^displaystyle hat alpha hat beta =hat beta hat alpha



Conjunction (AND)


If αdisplaystyle alpha and βdisplaystyle beta are two homogeneous histories then the history proposition "αdisplaystyle ,alpha and βdisplaystyle ,beta " is also a homogeneous history. It is represented by the projection operator


α∧β^:=α^β^displaystyle widehat alpha wedge beta :=hat alpha hat beta (=β^α^)displaystyle (=hat beta hat alpha )



Disjunction (OR)


If αdisplaystyle alpha and βdisplaystyle beta are two homogeneous histories then the history proposition "αdisplaystyle ,alpha or βdisplaystyle ,beta " is in general not a homogeneous history. It is represented by the projection operator


α∨β^:=α^+β^−α^β^displaystyle widehat alpha vee beta :=hat alpha +hat beta -hat alpha hat beta



Negation (NOT)


The negation operation in the lattice of projection operators takes P^displaystyle hat P to


¬P^:=I−P^displaystyle neg hat P:=mathbb I -hat P


where Idisplaystyle mathbb I is the identity operator on the Hilbert space. Thus the projector used to represent the proposition ¬αdisplaystyle neg alpha (i.e. "not αdisplaystyle alpha ") is


¬α^:=I−α^displaystyle widehat neg alpha :=mathbb I -hat alpha


where Idisplaystyle mathbb I is the identity operator on the history Hilbert space.



Example: Two-time history


As an example, consider the negation of the two-time homogeneous history proposition α=(α1,α2)displaystyle ,alpha =(alpha _1,alpha _2). The projector to represent the proposition ¬αdisplaystyle neg alpha is


¬α^=I⊗I−α^1⊗α^2displaystyle widehat neg alpha =mathbb I otimes mathbb I -hat alpha _1otimes hat alpha _2
=(I−α^1)⊗α^2+α^1⊗(I−α^2)+(I−α^1)⊗(I−α^2)displaystyle =(mathbb I -hat alpha _1)otimes hat alpha _2+hat alpha _1otimes (mathbb I -hat alpha _2)+(mathbb I -hat alpha _1)otimes (mathbb I -hat alpha _2)


The terms which appear in this expression:


  • (I−α^1)⊗α^2displaystyle (mathbb I -hat alpha _1)otimes hat alpha _2

  • α^1⊗(I−α^2)displaystyle hat alpha _1otimes (mathbb I -hat alpha _2)


  • (I−α^1)⊗(I−α^2)displaystyle (mathbb I -hat alpha _1)otimes (mathbb I -hat alpha _2).

can each be interpreted as follows:



  • α1displaystyle ,alpha _1 is false and α2displaystyle ,alpha _2 is true


  • α1displaystyle ,alpha _1 is true and α2displaystyle ,alpha _2 is false

  • both α1displaystyle ,alpha _1 is false and α2displaystyle ,alpha _2 is false

These three homogeneous histories, joined together with the OR operation, include all the possibilities for how the proposition "α1displaystyle ,alpha _1 and then α2displaystyle ,alpha _2" can be false. We therefore see that the definition of ¬α^displaystyle widehat neg alpha agrees with what the proposition ¬αdisplaystyle neg alpha should mean.



References


  • C.J. Isham, Quantum Logic and the Histories Approach to Quantum Theory, J.Math.Phys. 35 (1994) 2157-2185, arXiv:gr-qc/9308006v1

Popular posts from this blog

Solar Wings Breeze Design and development Specifications (Breeze) References Navigation menu1368-485X"Hang glider: Breeze (Solar Wings)"e

Kathakali Contents Etymology and nomenclature History Repertoire Songs and musical instruments Traditional plays Styles: Sampradayam Training centers and awards Relationship to other dance forms See also Notes References External links Navigation menueThe Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MSouth Asian Folklore: An EncyclopediaRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlayKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1353/atj.2005.0004The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism: A-MEncyclopedia of HinduismKathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to PlaySonic Liturgy: Ritual and Music in Hindu Tradition"The Mirror of Gesture"Kathakali Dance-drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play"Kathakali"Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceMedieval Indian Literature: An AnthologyThe Oxford Companion to Indian TheatreSouth Asian Folklore: An Encyclopedia : Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri LankaThe Rise of Performance Studies: Rethinking Richard Schechner's Broad SpectrumIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceModern Asian Theatre and Performance 1900-2000Critical Theory and PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyKathakali603847011Indian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceIndian Theatre: Traditions of PerformanceBetween Theater and AnthropologyBetween Theater and AnthropologyNambeesan Smaraka AwardsArchivedThe Cambridge Guide to TheatreRoutledge International Encyclopedia of Women: Global Women's Issues and KnowledgeThe Garland Encyclopedia of World Music: South Asia : the Indian subcontinentThe Ethos of Noh: Actors and Their Art10.2307/1145740By Means of Performance: Intercultural Studies of Theatre and Ritual10.1017/s204912550000100xReconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical ReaderPerformance TheoryListening to Theatre: The Aural Dimension of Beijing Opera10.2307/1146013Kathakali: The Art of the Non-WorldlyOn KathakaliKathakali, the dance theatreThe Kathakali Complex: Performance & StructureKathakali Dance-Drama: Where Gods and Demons Come to Play10.1093/obo/9780195399318-0071Drama and Ritual of Early Hinduism"In the Shadow of Hollywood Orientalism: Authentic East Indian Dancing"10.1080/08949460490274013Sanskrit Play Production in Ancient IndiaIndian Music: History and StructureBharata, the Nāṭyaśāstra233639306Table of Contents2238067286469807Dance In Indian Painting10.2307/32047833204783Kathakali Dance-Theatre: A Visual Narrative of Sacred Indian MimeIndian Classical Dance: The Renaissance and BeyondKathakali: an indigenous art-form of Keralaeee

Method to test if a number is a perfect power? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Detecting perfect squares faster than by extracting square rooteffective way to get the integer sequence A181392 from oeisA rarely mentioned fact about perfect powersHow many numbers such $n$ are there that $n<100,lfloorsqrtn rfloor mid n$Check perfect squareness by modulo division against multiple basesFor what pair of integers $(a,b)$ is $3^a + 7^b$ a perfect square.Do there exist any positive integers $n$ such that $lfloore^nrfloor$ is a perfect power? What is the probability that one exists?finding perfect power factors of an integerProve that the sequence contains a perfect square for any natural number $m $ in the domain of $f$ .Counting Perfect Powers